02a Crim02 Wk8 Lesson Proper

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

02A-CRIM02-WK8-LESSON PROPER

SUB-CULTURAL THEORY

The theory is linked to anomie and strain, exemplifying concepts of status frustration and differential
opportunity, which North American subcultural theorists used to explain as delinquent activities of
disadvantaged groups in the 1950s and 60s.

RICHARD CLOWARD and LLOYD OHLIN (1960) built on these ideas, pointing to the differential opportunity
structures available to lower - class young people in different neighborhoods: criminal (making a living from
crime), conflict (territorial violence and gang fighting) and retreatist (drugs and alcohol

SOCIAL CONTROL THEORY


This does not address the causes of crime, but rather focuses on why people obey the law. In other
words, it explains conformity rather than deviance. This theory is associated with the work of Travis Hirschi
(1969) on social norms due to strong social bonds. Conversely, they engage in delinquent acts when these
bonds are broken or become weak. It is non- traditional criminological perspectives because they seek to
explain why individuals conform to societal norms, and not why they commit crime.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fandragogytheory.com%2F2017%2F01%2F24%

Key components of social bonds are:


a. Attachment
How strong or weak is an individual’s relationship with others?
Do these others expect certain kinds of behavior (such as obeying the
law) from this individual? The stronger the attachment, the more the
individual will conform.
b. Commitment
The more an individual commits his/herself to a particular lifestyle
(for example, being married being a parent, having a job) the
more he/she has to lose if he/she becomes involved in crime
(and so deviate from the lifestyle).
c. Involvement
This component comes down to time. The more time the individual spends engaging in law
abiding behavior, the less time he/she has to engage in law breaking behavior.
d. Belief
This relates to upbringing. If an individual has been brought up to be las abiding, they are less
likely to become involved in crime.

5. Different association Theory


Proponent: Edwin E. Sutherland
This theory emphasized that crime is a result of social learning engaging in deviant behavior by
02A-CRIM02-WK8-LESSON PROPER

those with whom we socially interact. It is a learning theory that concentrates on one’s
associates and the normative definitions one learns from them.
Sutherland’s propositions for differential association theory are as follow:
1. Criminal behavior is learned.
2. Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication.
3. The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups.
4. When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes (a) techniques of committing the crime
which are sometimes very complicated, sometimes very simple, and (b) the specific direction of
motives drives, rationalizations, and attitudes.
5. The specific direction of motives and drives is learned from definitions of the legal codes
favorable or unfavorable.
6. A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law
over definitions unfavorable to violation of the law.
7. The process of learning criminal behavior by association with criminal and anti-criminal patterns
involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning.
8. Although criminal behavior is an expression of general need s and values, it is not explained by
those general needs and values, because noncriminal behavior is an expression of the same
needs and values.
9. Differential association varies in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity the most frequent
longest running, earliest and closest influences will be most efficacious or determinant of
learned behavior.

Visit the link below for more information about Social Control Theory
LINK: https://youtu.be/oEMWE9rJK3E

You might also like