The document identifies and provides examples of three levels of dilemmas:
1. Personal dilemmas involve weighing one's own beliefs and experiences to make the best personal decision. The example given is choosing between getting revenge on a sibling or taking the high road.
2. Organizational dilemmas involve making decisions that minimize harm to an organization by considering all stakeholders. The example is reporting a class bully to improve the learning environment.
3. Structural dilemmas at the highest levels of an organization involve using power and responsibility to create solutions that benefit both the organization and individuals. The example involves addressing harassment by a top performer to protect the company's future.
The document identifies and provides examples of three levels of dilemmas:
1. Personal dilemmas involve weighing one's own beliefs and experiences to make the best personal decision. The example given is choosing between getting revenge on a sibling or taking the high road.
2. Organizational dilemmas involve making decisions that minimize harm to an organization by considering all stakeholders. The example is reporting a class bully to improve the learning environment.
3. Structural dilemmas at the highest levels of an organization involve using power and responsibility to create solutions that benefit both the organization and individuals. The example involves addressing harassment by a top performer to protect the company's future.
The document identifies and provides examples of three levels of dilemmas:
1. Personal dilemmas involve weighing one's own beliefs and experiences to make the best personal decision. The example given is choosing between getting revenge on a sibling or taking the high road.
2. Organizational dilemmas involve making decisions that minimize harm to an organization by considering all stakeholders. The example is reporting a class bully to improve the learning environment.
3. Structural dilemmas at the highest levels of an organization involve using power and responsibility to create solutions that benefit both the organization and individuals. The example involves addressing harassment by a top performer to protect the company's future.
The document identifies and provides examples of three levels of dilemmas:
1. Personal dilemmas involve weighing one's own beliefs and experiences to make the best personal decision. The example given is choosing between getting revenge on a sibling or taking the high road.
2. Organizational dilemmas involve making decisions that minimize harm to an organization by considering all stakeholders. The example is reporting a class bully to improve the learning environment.
3. Structural dilemmas at the highest levels of an organization involve using power and responsibility to create solutions that benefit both the organization and individuals. The example involves addressing harassment by a top performer to protect the company's future.
Identify and explain the three levels of dilemmas and give your own example for each.
Type Definition Own Example
1. Personal Dilemmas It gives importance on the When my sister decided to
belief of what the person steal a “chicken skin” from my has been to and based their plate, I was enraged and driven life experience as an answer by it, I wanted to get even but I to dictate their best move was torn to “being a forgiving as possible. and matured big brother” from “being seen as a petty person that would stoop so low instead of minimizing anymore damage gained” 2. Organizational Dilemmas To be accurate, it speaks of Back in my grade 6 years, I how an organization remembered being bullied by minimize any further our Top class achiever because casualties by avoiding rash I stood out a lot from my decisions that only affect “unnatural look”. The hierarchy personal benefits. They system in schools for students rationalize in everything are “Top” or “Rankings”. and anything to morally conduct a solution that is I was Top 2 by that time , I was favorable among each 1 bar below him and I was also other. afraid of the consequences of ratting out on someone but I still told my advisory teacher on their inappropriate behavior towards me. I reported and they apologized which stopped their tyranny in our classroom which also improved our learning environment, helping us learn much better. 3. Structural Dilemmas “With Great power comes An employee which is on the with Great responsibilities”, Top ranking boards of hoarding in simply words, the one sales and revenues for your who mostly stands on the company is causing trouble by top in organizational units harassing female employees, are considered to take abusing his position he was account on both the equal making everyone amount of gains and loss uncomfortable however no one one must take to create a dares to speak up. Name: Hulyan Miguel C. Roxas Subject: Ethics Date:09/09/21
solution that is satisfactory Even if he is one of the most
to both the organization top performers on the job that and morally, to does not mean he is the only himself/herself as well. one, at this rate, everyone will be considering to transfer out of the company or just quit to find a new calling due to his bad behavior. You use your power to display who is in charge and advised him ceased his inappropriate behavior. You did not defend him, you did not encourage him and you did not helped/turned a blind eye to his actions. Which resulted into having satisfactory results for your employees and your company’s future.