Larana Inc.: Educational Consultancy Services

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Larana Inc.

Educational Consultancy Services


Open fracture

Also called a compound fracture usually caused


by high energy trauma where the bone is
exposed to the external environment

Tibial fractures are the most common in long


bone in the body. An insufficient blood flow
especially in the middle one third of its lenght
and lack of soft tissues in antero - medial aspect
are a predisposed factor for infection and non -
union after open fracture.
what is ilizarov
An Ilizarov apparatus is an orthopedic
device used to stimulate bone growth
and is generally used to treat complex
and/or open bone fractures and in cases
of infected non-union of bones that are
not responsive to other techniques. The
apparatus was named after its inventor, a
Siberian orthopedic surgeon named
‘Gavriil Abramovich Ilizarov’. The Ilizarov
fixator uses the principle of distraction
osteogenesis which refers to the pulling
apart of bone to stimulate new bone
growth through neovascularization.
ao external fixator
and intramedullary
AO external fixator: AO meaning Arbeitsgemeinschaft für
Osteosynthesefragen that roughly translates to working device for
osteosynthesis fragments

Intramedullary nailing is an internal fixation technique mainly used


for the surgical management of long bone diaphyseal fractures and
since more recently, also in metaphyseal and periarticular fractures.
Complications
Statistical analysis of AO 40%

external fixator
30%

20%

In a study made out of 42


patients, which the mean age
10%

was 32 +/- 15 years, 39 patients 0%


Wound infection Pin-tract infection Non union

achieved healing and 3 were not Efficacy Non union


healed by the end of the study 7%

(non union)
Along the study, 13 patients had
pin-tract infection and 6
patients had wound infection

Healed
93%
8%
Complications

Statistical analysis of 6%

intramedullary nailing 4%

2%

In a study made out of 112


patients, which the mean age 0%
Infection Non union

was 36 (range of 16-88 years),


Non union
8%
Efficacy
103 achieved healing and 9 had

non union
6 patients had infection

Healed
92%
20%
Complications

Statistical analysis of 15%

Ilizarov apparatus 10%

In a study made out of 42


5%

patients, 41 achieved healing 0%


Deep infection Non union Superficial infection Chronic osteomyelitis

and 1 had non union Non union


2%
Efficacy
8 patients had deep infection, 2

had superficial infection and 3


had chronic osteomyelitis

Healed
98%
Comparison of results
50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
Ilizarov AO external fixator Intramedullary nailing
CONCLUSION

Among the analyzed techniques, the Ilizarov apparatus proved to be the one with higher
efficacy. Although the Ilizarov apparatus has higher incidence of infectious complications
when compared with the intramedullary nailing, it can be managed by wound debridement
and/or antibiotics

You might also like