10.6 Continuing Airworthiness
10.6 Continuing Airworthiness
10.6 Continuing Airworthiness
Licence Category
A, B1, B2 and B3
Aviation Legislation
10.6 Continuing Airworthiness
LEVEL 1
A familiarisation with the principal elements of the subject.
Objectives:
The applicant should be familiar with the basic elements of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a simple description of the whole subject, using common words and
examples.
The applicant should be able to use typical terms.
LEVEL 2
A general knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
An ability to apply that knowledge.
Objectives:
The applicant should be able to understand the theoretical fundamentals of the subject.
The applicant should be able to give a general description of the subject using, as appropriate, typical
examples.
The applicant should be able to use mathematical formulae in conjunction with physical laws describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to read and understand sketches, drawings and schematics describing the
subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using detailed procedures.
LEVEL 3
A detailed knowledge of the theoretical and practical aspects of the subject.
A capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and comprehensive
manner.
Objectives:
The applicant should know the theory of the subject and interrelationships with other subjects.
The applicant should be able to give a detailed description of the subject using theoretical fundamentals
and specific examples.
The applicant should understand and be able to use mathematical formulae related to the subject.
The applicant should be able to read, understand and prepare sketches, simple drawings and schematics
describing the subject.
The applicant should be able to apply his knowledge in a practical manner using manufacturer's
instructions.
The applicant should be able to interpret results from various sources and measurements and apply
corrective action where appropriate.
You are strongly encouraged to study these documents in detail. The following is a summary of
the salient points only. On any Module 10 examination, you are likely to be examined on all
details of the Part-21 and Part-M including its AMC and GM.
If a certified aircraft has outstanding airworthiness directives that have not been complied with,
the aircraft is not considered airworthy. Thus, it is mandatory for an aircraft operator to comply
with an AD.
ADs usually result from service difficulty reporting by operators or from the results of aircraft
accident investigations. They are issued either by the national civil aviation authority of the
country of aircraft manufacture or of aircraft registration. When ADs are issued by the country of
registration they are almost always coordinated with the civil aviation authority of the country of
manufacture to ensure that conflicting ADs are not issued.
Those of an emergency nature requiring immediate compliance prior to further flight, and
Those of a less urgent nature requiring compliance within a specified period of time.
EASA issues an airworthiness directive when an unsafe condition has been determined by
EASA to exist in an aircraft, as a result of a deficiency in the aircraft, or an engine, propeller,
part or appliance installed on this aircraft; and that condition is likely to exist or develop in other
aircraft.
When an airworthiness directive is issued by EASA to correct the unsafe, or to require the
performance of an inspection, the holder of the type-certificate, restricted type-certificate,
supplemental type-certificate, major repair design approval, shall propose the appropriate
corrective action or required inspections, or both, and submit details of these proposals to the
EASA for approval.
Following the approval they will then make available to all known operators or owners of the
product, part or appliance and, on request, to any person required to comply with the
airworthiness directive, appropriate descriptive data and accomplishment instructions.
an identification of the
unsafe condition;
an identification of the
affected aircraft;
the action(s) required;
the compliance time for the
required action(s);
the date of entry into force.
More details relating to the
international recognition of
Airworthiness Directives can be
found in Section 10.7.
The holder of a type-certificate produces, maintains and updates master copies of all manuals
required for the continued airworthiness of the product, and provides copies, on request, to
EASA.
The holder of the type-certificate supplies at least one set of manuals for continued
airworthiness, comprising descriptive data and accomplishment instructions, to each known
owner of one or more aircraft, engine or propeller upon its delivery or upon issue of the first
certificate of airworthiness for the affected aircraft, whichever occurs later and thereafter make
those instructions available on request to any other person required to comply with any of the
terms of those instructions.
The availability of some manual or portion of the instructions for continued airworthiness,
dealing with overhaul or other forms of heavy maintenance, may be delayed until after the
product has entered into service, but is available before any of the products reaches the
relevant age or flight-hours/cycles.
In addition, changes to the instructions for continued airworthiness are made available to all
known operators of the product and are made available on request to any person required to
comply with any of those instructions.
A programme showing how changes to the instructions for continued airworthiness are
distributed is submitted to EASA.
For EASA aircraft, the Certificate of Airworthiness is issued in accordance with the requirements
of Part-21 Subpart H.
Further details of the issue of the Certificate of Airworthiness can be found in Section 10.5.
Elimination of damage by replacement of parts or appliances without the necessity for design
activity is considered as a maintenance task and therefore requires no approval under Part 21.
However, repairs that require design input are required to be designed by an approved Design
Organisation (approved in accordance with Part-21 Subpart J).
Classification of Repairs
A repair may be „major‟ or „minor‟. The classification is made in accordance with the criteria of
for a change in the type design.
by EASA; or
by an appropriately approved design organisation under a procedure agreed with EASA.
and that follow design data included in certification specifications issued by EASA, containing
acceptable methods, techniques and practices for carrying out and identifying standard repairs,
including the associated instructions for continuing airworthiness; and that are not in conflict
with TC holder‟s data.
Repair embodiment
The embodiment of a repair is made in accordance with Part-M or Part-145 as appropriate, or
by a production organisation appropriately approved in accordance with Part-21 Subpart G.
The design organisation provides to the organisation performing the repair all the necessary
installation instructions.
General
Part-M concerns the airworthiness management of aircraft registered in an EU member state.
All applicable aircraft have been subject to its provisions since September 28 2008. Prior to this
date JAR-OPS Subpart M contained a lot of this detail. Where Part-M differs is that it now also
contains regulations for independent Continuing Aircraft Management Organisations
(CAMO) and introduces the concept of the non-expiring Certificate of Airworthiness and the
Airworthiness Review Certificate (ARC).
EU-OPS (the replacement for JAR-OPS) now contains a much reduced Subpart M. All previous
contents of EU-OPS Subpart M has been transferred to Part-M.
Pre-Flight Airworthiness
Inspections Directives Defect
Rectification
Technical
Records
MEL / CDL
Maintenance
Programme
Reliability
Monitoring
Maintenance
Check Flights
Modifications
and Repairs
Lifing Parts
Control Technical
Log control
Operator
Contract or Maintenance
CAMO (Part-M Work Order Organisation
Sub Part G)
Applicable
Design and
maintenance
Manufacture
and design data
organisation
From the above it can be seen that the Part-M Subpart G Continuing Airworthiness
Management Organisation (CAMO) is the interface between the owner and any Part-145
organisation that it may contract maintenance to. In the event that the Part-145 organisation is
internal then a service level agreement must be included within the Part-M Exposition. In the
case of one-off tasks (e.g. to recover an aircraft) individual work orders can be used.
Private owners of large aircraft (> 5700Kg MTOW) can contract a CAMO to act on their
behalf. The CAMO will be approved under Part-M Subpart G.
All CAT aircraft, Twin Engine Helicopters and Large Aircraft must be managed by a
CAMO approved in accordance with Part-M Subpart G.
Light Non CAT aircraft must be managed for airworthiness in accordance with Part-M
Subpart C this can be carried out by the Owner, A licensed engineer or a CAMO.
General
The owner/lessee is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft and shall ensure
that no flight takes place unless:
When the aircraft is leased the responsibility of the owner is transferred to the lessee if:
or;
For simplicity in these training notes we shall refer to the operator, who may be the owner or the
lessee, except when extra clarity is required.
Any person or organisation performing maintenance is responsible for the tasks performed.
Pre-flight Servicing
The pilot-in-command or, in the case of commercial air transport, the operator is responsible for
the satisfactory accomplishment of the pre-flight inspection. This inspection must be carried out
by the pilot or another qualified person but need not be carried out by an approved maintenance
organisation or by Part-66 certifying staff.
In the case of large aircraft, in order to satisfy these responsibilities, the owner of an aircraft
shall ensure that the tasks associated with continuing airworthiness are performed by a CAMO.
A written contract is made in accordance with Appendix I to Part-M. In this case, the continuing
airworthiness management organisation assumes responsibility for the proper accomplishment
of these tasks.
The performance of ground de-icing and anti-icing activities does not require a Part-145
approval.
The requirement means that the operator is responsible for determining what maintenance is
required, when it has to be performed and by whom and to what standard, in order to ensure
the continued airworthiness of the aircraft being operated.
An operator should therefore have adequate knowledge of the design status (type specification,
customer options, airworthiness directives (AD), modifications, operational equipment) and
required and performed maintenance. Status of aircraft design and maintenance should be
adequately documented to support the performance of the quality system.
The requirement does not mean that an operator himself performs the maintenance (this is to
be done by a maintenance organisation approved to Part-145) but that the operator carries the
responsibility for the airworthy condition of aircraft it operates and thus should be satisfied
before the intended flight that all required maintenance has been properly carried out.
When an operator is not appropriately approved in accordance with Part-145, the operator
should provide a clear work order to the maintenance contractor. The fact that an operator has
contracted a maintenance organisation approved under Part-145 should not prevent it from
checking at the maintenance facilities on any aspect of the contracted work if he wishes to do
so to satisfy his responsibility for the airworthiness of the aircraft.
An operator only needs to be approved for the management of the continuing airworthiness of
the aircraft listed on its Air Operators Certificate (AOC). The approval to carry out airworthiness
reviews is optional.
This approval does not prevent the operator subcontracting certain continuing airworthiness
management tasks to competent persons or organisations. This activity is considered as an
integral element of the operator‟s Part-M Subpart G approval. The regulatory monitoring is
exercised through the operator‟s Part-M Subpart G. approval. The contracts should be
acceptable to the competent authority.
Part-M does not provide for organisations to be independently approved to perform continuing
airworthiness management tasks on behalf of commercial air transport operators. The approval
of such activity is vested in the operator‟s air operator‟s certificate (AOC). The sub-contracted
organisation is considered to perform the continuing airworthiness management tasks as an
In order to retain ultimate responsibility, the operator should limit sub-contracted tasks to the
activities specified below:
With the exception of engines and auxiliary power units contracts would normally be limited to
one organisation per aircraft type for any combination of the activities. Where arrangements are
made with more than one organisation the operator should demonstrate adequate co-ordination
controls are in place and that the individual responsibilities are clearly defined in related
contracts.
The operator should ensure that any findings arising from the competent authority monitoring of
the sub-contracted continuing airworthiness management tasks will be closed to the satisfaction
of the competent authority. This provision should be included in the contract.
The sub-contracted organisation should agree to notify the respective operators of any changes
affecting the contracts as soon as practical. The operator should then inform its competent
authority. Failure to do so may invalidate the competent authority acceptance of the contract.
Occurrence reporting for Part-M requirements are exactly the same as those for Part-145. They
are repeated below:
Any person or organisation responsible shall report to the State of registry, the
organisation responsible for the type design or supplemental type design and, if
applicable, the Member State of operator, any identified condition of an aircraft or
component that hazards seriously the flight safety.
Reports are made in a manner established by EASA and contain all pertinent information
about the condition known to the person or organisation.
Reports are made as soon as practicable, but in any case within 72-hours of the person
or organisation identifying the condition to which the report relates.
Later in this section you will see how management of airworthiness is achieved in different ways
for large and small organisations, to suit their business. In any case they must always carry out
certain airworthiness tasks. Part-M lists those tasks.
the rectification to an officially recognised standard of any defect and damage affecting
safe operation taking into account, for all large aircraft or aircraft used for commercial air
transport, the Minimum Equipment List (MEL) and Configuration Deviation List (CDL) if
applicable to the aircraft type;
for all large aircraft or aircraft used for commercial air transport the analysis of the
effectiveness of the approved maintenance programme, with regard to spares,
established defects, malfunctions and damage, and to amend the programme as
necessary.
3. for non-mandatory modifications and/or inspections, for all large aircraft or aircraft used
for commercial air transport the establishment of an embodiment policy;
Pre-flight is a Part-M function. It may be carried out by the flight crew or persons nominated by
the CAMO. Training procedures for performing pre-flight inspection should be described in the
operators Continuing Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME).
The maintenance programme and any subsequent amendments are approved by the
competent authority.
Notwithstanding this previous sentence, when the aircraft continuing airworthiness is managed
by a CAMO approved under Part-M Subpart G the maintenance programme and its
amendments may be approved through a maintenance programme procedure established by
such organisation (hereinafter called indirect approval).
instructions issued by the competent authority, if they differ from paragraph 1 or in the
absence of specific recommendations, or
instructions defined by the owner or the operator and approved by the competent
authority if they differ from paragraphs 1 and 2.
The maintenance programme shall contain details, including frequency, of all maintenance to be
carried out, including any specific tasks linked to specific operations. The programme must
include a reliability programme when the maintenance programme is based on Maintenance
Steering Group logic, or on Condition Monitoring.
The term “maintenance programme” is intended to include scheduled maintenance tasks the
associated procedures and standard maintenance practises. The term “maintenance schedule”
is intended to embrace the scheduled maintenance tasks alone.
The aircraft should only be maintained to one approved maintenance programme at a given
point in time. Where an owner or operator wishes to change from one approved programme to
other, a transfer check or inspection may need to be performed in order to implement the
change.
The approved aircraft maintenance programme should reflect applicable mandatory regulatory
requirements addressed in documents issued by the TC holder to comply with Part-21.A.61.
Repetitive maintenance tasks derived from modifications and repairs should be incorporated
into the approved maintenance programme.
Damage is assessed and modifications and repairs carried out using data approved by EASA or
by an approved Part-21 design organisation, as appropriate.
At the completion of any maintenance, the associated certificate of release to service is entered
in the aircraft continuing airworthiness records. Each entry is made as soon as practicable but in
no event more than 30 days after the day of maintenance action.
The aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall consist of, as appropriate, an aircraft
logbook, engine logbook(s) or engine module log cards, propeller logbook(s) and log cards, for
any service life limited component and the operator's technical log.
The aircraft type and registration mark, the date, together with total flight time and/or flight
cycles and/or landings, as appropriate, is entered in the aircraft logbooks.
An owner or operator shall ensure that a system has been established to keep the following
records for the periods specified:
All detailed maintenance records in respect of the aircraft and any life-limited
component fitted thereto, at least 24-months after the aircraft or component was
permanently withdrawn from service.
The total time and flight cycles as appropriate, of the aircraft and all life-limited
components, at least 12-months after the aircraft or component has been permanently
withdrawn from service, and;
The time and flight cycles as appropriate, since last scheduled maintenance of the
component subjected to a service life limit, at least until the component scheduled
maintenance has been superseded by another scheduled maintenance of equivalent
work scope and detail.
The current status of compliance with maintenance programme such that compliance
with the approved aircraft maintenance programme can be established, at least until
the aircraft or component scheduled maintenance has been superseded by other
scheduled maintenance of equivalent work scope and detail
The current status of airworthiness directives applicable to the aircraft and
components, at least 12-months after the aircraft or component has been permanently
withdrawn from service, and; Details of current modifications and repairs to the aircraft,
engine(s), propeller(s) and any other component vital to flight safety, at least
12-months after they have been permanently withdrawn from service.
In the case of commercial air transport, an operator shall use an aircraft technical log system
containing the following information for each aircraft:
information about each flight, necessary to ensure continued flight safety, and;
the current aircraft certificate of release to service, and;
the current maintenance statement giving the aircraft maintenance status of what
scheduled and out of phase maintenance is next due except that the competent
authority may agree to the maintenance statement being kept elsewhere, and;
all outstanding deferred defects rectifications that affect the operation of the aircraft,
and;
any necessary guidance instructions on maintenance support arrangements.
An operator shall ensure that the aircraft technical log is retained for 36 months after the date of
the last entry.
For commercial air transport the operator‟s aircraft technical log is a system for recording
defects and malfunctions during the aircraft operation and for recording details of all
maintenance carried out on an aircraft between scheduled base maintenance visits. In addition,
it is used for recording flight safety and maintenance information the operating crew need to
know.
Cabin or galley defects and malfunctions that affect the safe operation of the aircraft or the
safety of its occupants are regarded as forming part of the aircraft log book where recorded by
another means.
The operator‟s aircraft technical log system may range from a simple single section document to
a complex system containing many sections but in all cases it should include the information
specified in Part-M.
An example page from an aircraft Technical Log Sector Record Page. For each sector
flown, it records details of the flight, including uplifts (fuel etc.), any ground de/anti-icing
carried out, and details of any defects and their subsequent rectification r deferral of
rectification in accordance with the MEL.
For those studying Part-145, you will notice that there is some duplication, but that is inevitable
as to comply with Subpart D those same standards must be incorporated within any Part-145
organisation also.
Maintenance Data
M.A.401
The person or organisation maintaining an aircraft shall have access to and use only applicable
current maintenance data in the performance of maintenance including modifications and
repairs.
Applicable maintenance data must be current and readily available for use, before maintaining
an aircraft or component. A worksheet or work-card system required. The data must be either
accurately transcribed onto the worksheets or they should make precise reference to the tasks
in the maintenance data.
Performance of Maintenance
M.A.402
All maintenance is performed using the tools, equipment and material specified in Part-M unless
otherwise specified by Part-145. Where necessary, tools and equipment are controlled and
calibrated to an officially recognised standard.
The area in which maintenance is carried out is well organised and clean in respect of dirt and
contamination.
Independent Inspections
An independent inspection is an inspection first made by an authorised person signing the
maintenance release who assumes full responsibility for the satisfactory completion of the work,
before being subsequently inspected by a second independent competent person who attests to
the satisfactory completion of the work recorded and that no deficiencies have been found.
The manufactures instructions for continued airworthiness should be followed when determining
the need for an independent inspection.
A control system is an aircraft system by which the flight path, attitude, or propulsive force of the
aircraft is changed, including the flight, engine and propeller controls, the related system
controls and the associated operating mechanisms.
Independent inspections should be carried out by at least two persons, to ensure correct
assembly, locking and sense of operation. A technical record of the inspections should contain
the signatures of both persons before the relevant CRS is issued.
The second independent competent person is not issuing a maintenance release therefore is
not required to hold certification privileges. However they should be suitably qualified to carry
out the inspection.
When work is being done under the control of an approved maintenance organisation the
organisation should have procedures to demonstrate that the signatories have been trained and
have gained experience on the specific control systems being inspected.
When work is being undertaken by certifying staff who are independent of the Part-M
organisation, the qualifications and experience of the second independent competent person
should be directly assessed by the person certifying for the maintenance, taking into account
the individual‟s training and experience. It should not be acceptable for the certifying staff
signing the release to show the person performing the independent inspection how to perform
the inspection at the time the work is completed.
When checking control systems that have undergone maintenance the person signing the
maintenance release and the person performing the independent check should consider the
following points independently:
all those parts of the system that have actually been disconnected or disturbed should be
inspected for correct assembly and locking.
the system as a whole should be inspected for full and free movement over the complete
range.
cables should be tensioned correctly with adequate clearance at secondary stops.
the operation of the control system as a whole should be observed to ensure that the
controls are operating in the correct sense.
if the control system is duplicated to provide redundancy, each system should be
checked separately.
If different control systems are interconnected so that they affect each other, all the
interactions should be checked through the full range of the applicable controls.
Aircraft Defects
M.A.403
Any aircraft defect that hazards seriously the flight safety is rectified before further flight.
Only the authorised certifying staff, according to Part-M or Part-145 can decide whether an
aircraft defect hazards seriously the flight safety and therefore decide when and which
rectification action is taken before further flight and which defect rectification can be deferred.
However, this does not apply when:
The approved minimum equipment list as mandated by the competent authority is used
by the pilot; or,
Aircraft defects are defined as being acceptable by the competent authority.
Any aircraft defect that would not hazard seriously the flight safety is rectified as soon as
practicable, after the date the aircraft defect was first identified and within any limits specified in
the maintenance data. Any defect not rectified before flight is recorded in the aircraft
maintenance record system or operator's technical log system as applicable.
Module 10.6 Continuing Airworthiness 6-33
ST Aerospace Ltd For Training Purposes Only
© Copyright 2014
Control cable adjustment
M.A.501 – Installation
M.A.502 – Component maintenance
M.A.503 – Service life limited components
M.A.504 – Control of unserviceable
components
This Subpart identifies the requirements to be met by an organisation to qualify for the approval
to certify the maintenance of small aircraft not used for commercial air transport.
The requirements mirror those contained in Part-145, however they have been adjusted to
reflect the complexity of the equipment and scale of the operations supported.
See “Section 10.3 – Approved Maintenance Organisations”, for further details of the
requirements for organisations approved in accordance with Part-M Subpart F.
An operator must have an AOC. To obtain an AOC the operator‟s application must contain:
The CAME referred to above has the same contents as the CAME content shown below for an
independent CAMO.
Independent CAMO
The application is made on EASA form 2 and shall consist of an Exposition (CAME) containing
the following:
a statement signed by the accountable manager to confirm that the organisation will work
in accordance with Part-M and the exposition at all times, and;
the organisation's scope of work, and;
the title(s) and name(s) of person(s) referred to in Part-M, and;
an organisation chart showing associated chains of responsibility between the person(s)
referred to in Part-M, and;
a list of airworthiness review staff, and;
a general description and location of the facilities, and;
procedures specifying how the continuing airworthiness management organisation
ensures compliance with Part-M, and;
The continuing airworthiness management exposition amendment procedures.
The continuing
airworthiness management
exposition and its
amendments are approved
by the competent authority.
Minor amendments to the
exposition may be
approved through an
exposition procedure
(hereinafter called indirect
approval).
A CAMO may:
In order to retain ultimate responsibility the operator should limit sub-contracted tasks to the
activities specified below:
CAMO Facilities
M.A.705
Suitable office accommodation at appropriate locations must be provided for the CAMO staff.
For CAT, the Accountable Manager shall designate a nominated post holder responsible for the
management and supervision of continuing airworthiness activities.
CAMO Duties
M.A.708
The organisation shall for each aircraft managed: need to apply Sub-part D maintenance
standards and ensure the following Subpart C tasks are carried out:
Develop and control an approved maintenance programme and gain approval from the
competent authority
Manage approval of modifications and repairs
Ensure all maintenance is carried our per the approved maintenance programme and a
CRS is issued for all work carried out
Ensure all ADs are complied with
Ensure all defects are rectified
Ensure aircraft is taken to a Part-145 organisation whenever necessary
Co-ordinate all scheduled maintenance and ADs to ensure the work is carried out
properly (standards monitoring)
Manage and archive records
Ensure accuracy of the mass and balance statement
Where an Operator is not appropriately approved to Part-45, the Operator shall have a written
maintenance contract with the Part-145 organisation(s).
All contracts are specified in the CAME and thus approved by the Competent Authority
Unscheduled line maintenance and component maintenance may be controlled by individual
work orders.
Except for aircraft released to service by a Part-145 organisation, the certificate of release to
service is issued according to this Subpart.
A certificate of release to service is issued before flight at the completion of any maintenance.
When satisfied that all maintenance required has been properly carried out, a certificate of
release to service is issued:
Except for complex maintenance tasks listed in Appendix VII, by certifying staff in
compliance with the requirements of Part-66; or
By the pilot-owner.
The certifying staff may be assisted in the execution of the maintenance tasks by one or more
persons under his direct and continuous control.
A certificate of release to service shall contain basic details of the maintenance carried out, the
date such maintenance was completed and:
the identity and if applicable licence number of the certifying staff must be annotated
on the CRS.
In the case of incomplete maintenance, such fact is entered in the aircraft certificate of release
to service before the issue of such certificate.
A certificate of release to service shall not be issued in the case of any known non-compliance
which hazards seriously the flight safety.
The authorised release certificate identified as EASA Form-1 for the Member States constitutes
the aircraft component certificate of release to service.
The pilot-owner is the person who owns or jointly owns the aircraft being maintained and holds
a valid pilot licence with the appropriate type or class rating.
For any privately operated aircraft of simple design with a maximum take-off mass (MTOM) of
less than 2730 kg, glider and balloon, the pilot-owner may issue the certificate of release to
service after limited pilot owner maintenance listed in Appendix VIII to Part-M.
The certificate of release to service must be entered in the logbooks and contain basic details of
the maintenance carried out, the date such maintenance was completed and the identity and
pilot licence number of the pilot-owner issuing such a certificate.
General
For an aircraft‟s Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A) to be valid a current Airworthiness Review
Certificate (ARC) must be attached.
The airworthiness review can be anticipated by a maximum period of 90 days without loss of
continuity of the airworthiness review pattern, to allow the physical review to take place during
maintenance.
If aircraft maintained in
a controlled
environment, the
CAMO issues an ARC
(on Form 15b)
2010 2011 and may extend the
2009 2012 validity twice (for ARCs
it originally issued)
If aircraft NOT
maintained in a
controlled environment,
the CAMO issues a
recommendation to the
Competent Authority
for issue of the ARC
2009 2010 2011 2012 (on Form 15a)
annually.
The organisation shall have appropriate airworthiness review staff to issue airworthiness review
certificates (ARC) or recommendations. They will be qualified as follows:
formally accepted by the competent authority prior to authorisation issue. (on EASA
Form-4).
5-years continuing airworthiness experience.
appropriate Part-66 license or aeronautical degree or equivalent in addition to formal
aeronautical engineering training.
a position within the approved organisation with appropriate responsibilities.
named in the CAME.
The airworthiness review staff must be independent from the airworthiness management
process.
This includes maintenance carried out by the pilot-owner and release to service by the pilot-
owner or independent licensed engineer where permitted by Part-M.
Where the controlled environment cannot be maintained or if the CAMO does not hold the
privilege to issue an ARC, another CAMO which holds the privilege needs to be contracted.
The ARC would then be issued by the authority following a satisfactory assessment
based on a recommendation from this contracted CAMO.
ARC Validity
The ARC is invalidated when:
it is suspended or revoked
the Certificate of Airworthiness is suspended or revoked
the aircraft is not on the register of an EASA member state or
the Type Certificate (TC) is suspended or revoked
Note that the Certificate of Airworthiness is valid indefinitely providing a valid ARC is attached to
it.
Module 10.6 Continuing Airworthiness 6-45
ST Aerospace Ltd For Training Purposes Only
© Copyright 2014
Module 10.6 Continuing Airworthiness 6-46
ST Aerospace Ltd For Training Purposes Only
© Copyright 2014
Worksheet 10.6
Use the following worksheet to revise your knowledge. Use the original documents of Part-21
and Part-M.
2. List the three types of Certificates for which Regulation 748/2012 provides the common
technical requirements (according to the Scope and definitions).
3. What are Article 8 and Article 9 of Regulation 748/2012 concerned with, respectively?
Article 8 –
Article 9 –
6. Who is the competent authority for an organisation having their principle place of
business in a non-member state of EASA?
21.A.3B
8. Which two organisations can issue an Airworthiness Directive?
21.A.57
10. Who is responsible for producing and maintaining manuals required for the continuing
airworthiness of aircraft and products?
Subpart H
21.A.173
11. List the two Classifications of Airworthiness Certificates:
21.A.179
12. When an aircraft is transferred and re-registered in another EASA member state, what
happens to the Airworthiness Certificate?
Subpart M
21.A.431
14. What is the definition of a „Repair‟?
21.A.432B
15. How does an applicant for a major repair design approval demonstrate its capability?
21.A.435
16. What are the two classifications of „Repair‟?
19. In what Journal is the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042-2003 published in?
20. According to Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042-2003, the Rules do not
apply to aircraft which are listed where?
21. For the purposes of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042-2003, what is the definition of
a “large aircraft”?
Subpart B
M.A.201
24. Who is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft?
25. Who is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft if the owner leases it to
a different operator?
28. Maintenance of large aircraft, aircraft used for commercial air transport and components
thereof are carried out by what approved organisation type?
29. An operator of commercial air transport aircraft, must have what Subpart M approval as a
part of their Air Operator Certificate (AOC)?
30. If an operator of commercial air transport aircraft is not itself Part-145 approved, how can
they get their aircraft maintained?
31. When an operator who uses an aircraft other than for commercial air transport, they have
a choice of 2 organisations where they can get their aircraft maintained. What are they?
M.A.202
32. To which persons/organisation must any person or organisation approved under Part-M,
make an occurrence report when they find any identified condition of an aircraft or
component that hazards seriously the flight safety.
33. How soon should any person or organisation approved under Part-M, make an
occurrence report when they find any identified condition of an aircraft or component that
hazards seriously the flight safety.
M.A.302
34. Who approves a maintenance programme?
36. What approved organisation can approve their own amendments to the maintenance
programme?
M.A.304
37. What approved organisation (other than EASA) can provide data for modifications and
repairs?
M.A.305
38. What 3 Log Books must be kept in the aircraft‟s continuing airworthiness record?
39. The aircraft continuing airworthiness records shall contain what six (6) items of
information?
M.A.306
41. Which aircraft require a Technical Log?
42. List the 5 items of information contained within the Technical Log for each aircraft
M.A.402
45. After what kind of maintenance task must an Independent Inspection be carried out?
M.A.403
46. Any aircraft defect that hazards seriously the flight safety must be rectified by when?
Subpart E
M.A.502
48. The maintenance of components is performed only by what appropriately approved
maintenance organisations?
Subpart F
M.A.601
49. To what aircraft is Subpart F of Part-M applicable?
M.A.606
50. Who has corporate authority for ensuring that all maintenance required by the customer
can be financed and carried out to the standard required by Part-M?
51. What is the restriction placed on contracted staff working in a Part-M Subpart F
organisation?
53. In the unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other than the main
base where no appropriate certifying staff is available, the maintenance organisation
contracted to provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification authorisation
to any person with not less than how many years maintenance experience and holding a
valid ICAO aircraft maintenance licence rated for the aircraft type requiring certification?
Subpart G
M.A.701
56. Subpart G of Part-M is the requirements for issue of what approval?
M.A.706
58. Who is at the head of a CAMO?
59. The accountable manager of a CAMO for commercial air transport is to be the same
accountable manager for the approved organisation holding what certificate?
M.A.708
62. Who develops and controls a maintenance programme?
M.A.701
63. What are the two main functions required in order to complete an Airworthiness Review?
M.A.803
66. Under what weight category may the Pilot-Owner of an aircraft issue a certificate of
release to service?
Subpart I
M.A.901
68. For how long is an Airworthiness Review Certificate valid?
72. List the 4 reasons that an ARC may be invalidated before it expires:
Appendix IV
74. Name the following Part-M Subpart F rating classes:
- A2
- A3
- B1
- B2
- C14
- C15
Appendix V
76. What is the purpose of the Approval Schedule, and where will you find it?
Appendix VIII
77. Which of the following maintenance tasks can a Pilot-Owner carryout him/herself (tick)?