Prayer Before Study: Philia Sophia Love of Wisdom

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

REVIEWER- INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON

Prayer before Study


Lord, I know you are with me and love me.
Give me peace of mind as I prepare for this time of study.
Help me to focus, keep me from all distractions so that
I will make the best use of this time that is available to me.
Give me insight that I might understand what I am studying,
and help me to remember it when the time comes.
Above all, I thank you for the ability to be able to study
and for the many gifts and talents you have given me.
Help me always to use them in such a way that they honor you
and do justice to myself. Amen

TOPIC 1: NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY


Philosophy comes from the two (2) Greek words:
Philia “to love” Sophia “wisdom”
Philosophy is the “love of wisdom”.
Philosophy is considered as a science because:
 The investigation is systematic
 It follows certain steps or it employs certain procedures
 It is an organized body of knowledge just like any other sciences

TOPIC 2: THE BEGINNINGS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY


Vocabulary:
Triumvirate (in Ancient Rome) a group of three men holding power in particular
Hylozoist the doctrine that all matters has life
Contemplative involving or given to deep reflection or thinking
Milesians
Thales father of Western Philosophy. He assumed that the earth is flat
Anaximander for him, fundamental substance of reality is the infinite or apeiron
Anaximenes for him, the fundamental substance is air.
Pre-Socratic Philosophers
Pythagoras- treated philosophy as a way of life and primary constituent of reality is numbers
Heraclitus- believe that the only permanent in the world is change
Parminedes- contradicts the idea of change and there is no such thing as change and motion
Empedocles- believed to be immortal. Believed that reality is made up of 4 elements (earth, air, water,
fire)
Anaxagoras- acknowledged the idea or nous or mind
Zeno-pronounced that there is no motion

TOPIC 3: APPROACHES IN DOING PHILOSOPHY


Critical or analytic- analyze and define our fundamental concepts and clear the resolute criticism
Speculative-aims to reach some general conclusions as to the nature of the universe
Reductionist-understanding complex ideas by reducing them to their parts or individual constituents
Holistic-works on assumptions that all properties in a system cannot be broken down by its
components
TOPIC 4: METHODS OF PHILOSOPHIZING
Vocabulary
Knowledge- facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education
Wisdom- the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment
Opinion- view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
Illusion- an instance of a wrong or misinterpreted perception of a sensory experience
Imagination- the faculty of forming new ideas, or images or concept of external objects not present
to the senses.

Plato’s Contribution to the Acquisition of Knowledge


Plato was an Athenian philosopher during the Classical period in Ancient Greece. Founder of the
Platonist school of thought, and the Academy, the first institution of higher learning in the Western
world.
Plato said “Virtue is knowledge and knowledge is wisdom”
World of Forms and Ideas- a world in another dimension which contains the perfect knowledge—
unchanging and eternal forms and ideas
Human beings were called dualistic because we possessed the attributes of mind and body
1. Plato’s metaphysical system
2. Allegory of the Cave (Refer to the uploaded videos)
3. Plato’s Divided Line

Socrates
Socrates said “the unexamined life is not worth living”
Socratic-Dialectic Method (refer to the uploaded video)
He was accused of poisoning the mind of the young generation. Thus, punished and sentenced to death
by letting him drink the poisonous extract of the Hemlock plant

Rene Descartes
For him, “doubting is a form of thinking”
Never accept the truth of someone’s statement without any proof or evidence

TOPIC 5: NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE

3 stages of apprehension before knowledge become possible


Perception- recognizing objects
External perception -perceiving object using 5 senses (tangible objects)
Result of this process is called percept
Internal perception -perceiving object using memory or imagination (intangible
objects)
-Result of this process is called image or phantasm
Abstraction- act perceiving the object intellectually, without affirming or denying anything
concerning it.
- The result of this process are concepts -- exist in the mind
- When words express concepts, they are technically called terms
Judgment- It completes the act of mind for knowledge to become possible
The result of this process is called statement or proposition
SENTENCES AND STATEMENTS

Analytic statement- The truth or falsity of the knowledge claim being made could be found within the
statement itself. (more on definition)
Ex. A puppy is a young dog (this statement is true because the puppy was defined as a young dog) –No
further inquiries to be made because the reason was already given in the statement)

Empirical statement- The truth or falsity being claimed rests on its correspondence with facts or with
the current state of affairs being claimed (more of describing the object)
Ex. The cat is on the mat (we cannot say that this statement is true or false because we need to validate
if the cat is really on the mat)

Note: Analytic-analyzes the statement Empirical-requires investigation or validation

TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE
Formal Knowledge- adhere with the well-formed formulas in mathematics, linguistic, and logic.
Characterized by the consistency of the system being used
Empirical Knowledge-depends on the investigation and further studies in hard and soft sciences like
botany, physics, chemistry, anthropology). Use the faculty of experience and sense perception in order
to establish their knowledge claims
THEORIES OF TRUTH
3 theories of truth:
Coherence theory- Deals with the consistency of the truth of statements being claimed within the
system used or employed. (Consistent)
Ex. Blue is a color

Correspondence theory- Has to do with the correspondence of knowledge claims being made with
the state of affairs in the world. (Actual scenario—involves objects as evidence)
Ex. The cat is on the mat (upon checking, the cat is really on that state)

Pragmatic theory- based on the good or practical consequences of an idea. “If I do this, what is it for
me?” (Practicality)
Ex. The concept of santa claus is true because he gave me presents

MORALITY
MORALITY
 Comes from the root word “mores”—are the customs including the customary behavior of a
particular group of people.
 Therefore, mores (Latin) and ethos (Greek), both refers to customary behavior.
Ethics
 Is a branch of philosophy that deals with the systematic questioning and critical examination of
the underlying principles of morality.
 Comes from the root word “ethos” which refers to the character of a culture. It includes the
attitude of approval or disapproval in a particular culture at a given time and place.
2 Approaches in Ethics
Normative ethics destined to give an answer to the question “what is good?”
Ex. Is it okay to cheat during examination?
Meta-ethics tries to go beyond the concepts and parameters set by normative ethics by trying to
question the basis of the assumptions proposed in the framework of norms and standards by normative
ethics
Ex. What makes cheating bad?
FREEDOM
is assumed when one is making his choices and is the agent that is taking full responsibility in
planning his life, and in the process, planning and budgeting his actions for some future outlook or
goals.
Human being is free…but such freedom is not absolute because we need to adhere with the
standard set by our society.
Ex. Human being is free and capable to kill somebody. But killing is punishable by law.
Human beings were subjected to the context of morality because we are capable to deliberate and
reflect using our rational capacity.
2 Choices of Human Beings
Intellectual choice choosing what is the right thing to do
Practical choice choosing what is beneficial and what made you happy
MORAL REASONING is a process of examining moral arguments -- argument is defined as the
search for a statement or a set statements that can be made to yield a conclusion. Also called known as
evaluative reasoning since one is trying to evaluate the soundness of the argument from the moral point
of view.
2 Approaches in Moral Reasoning
Deontological Reasoning- is an ethic based on duty
 Greek word “dein” meaning duty.
 Recognizes that there are moral principles that we follow which we consider as universally
correct and should be applicable to all humanity.
Teleological Ethics- goal or purpose of an action must be based on its consequences
 “telos” meaning end
 “The end justifies the means”
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
is the discipline in philosophy that studies the moral relationship of human beings to, and also
the value and moral status of, the environment and its non-human contents
Eco-feminism- believes that a society characterized by a mentality that tolerates the oppression of
women is directly linked with its tendency to tolerate the abuse of the environment and degradation of
nature
Anthropocentrism- refers to a human-centered, or “anthropocentric,” point of view. In philosophy,
anthropocentrism can refer to the point of view that humans are the only, or primary, holders of moral
standing. Anthropocentric value systems thus see nature in terms of its value to humans
Pathocentrism- based on the assumption that all life is of the same origin and thus related. As a
consequence, all living beings have the capacity to experience pain.
Holism-contrary to individualistic approaches, particularly anthropocentrism.
Biocentrism- can be either individualistic or holistic. Ecosystems and non-living nature are excluded
(water!)
1 Corinthians 4:2
Moreover, it is required of stewards that they be found trustworthy.

You might also like