Edexcel IAL Physics Unit 6 October 2021 Markscheme (MS)
Edexcel IAL Physics Unit 6 October 2021 Markscheme (MS)
Edexcel IAL Physics Unit 6 October 2021 Markscheme (MS)
October 2021
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body.
We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and
specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications
websites at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with
us using the details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone
progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds
of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150
years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international
reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through
innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at:
www.pearson.com/uk
Autumn 2021
Question Paper Log Number: P67150A
Publications Code WPH16_01_2110_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2021
General Marking Guidance
• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the first
candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for what they
have shown they can do rather than penalised for omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to their perception
of where the grade boundaries may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme should be used
appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners should
always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark scheme.
Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the candidate’s response is
not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by which
marks will be awarded and exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a
candidate’s response, the team leader must be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced it with an
alternative response.
Mark scheme notes
Underlying principle
The mark scheme will clearly indicate the concept that is being rewarded, backed up by examples. It is
not a set of model answers.
For example:
(iii) Horizontal force of hinge on table top
66.3 (N) or 66 (N) and correct indication of direction [no ue] (1) 1
[Some examples of direction: acting from right (to left) / to the left / West /
opposite direction to horizontal. May show direction by arrow. Do not accept a
minus sign in front of number as direction.]
This has a clear statement of the principle for awarding the mark, supported by some examples
illustrating acceptable boundaries.
3. Significant figures
3.1 Use of an inappropriate number of significant figures in the theory papers will normally only
be penalised in ‘show that’ questions where use of too few significant figures has resulted in
the candidate not demonstrating the validity of the given answer.
3.2 The use of g = 10 m s−2 or 10 N kg−1 instead of 9.81 m s−2 or 9.81 N kg−1 will be penalised by
one mark (but not more than once per clip). Accept 9.8 m s−2 or 9.8 N kg−1
4. Calculations
4.1 Bald (i.e. no working shown) correct answers score full marks unless in a ‘show that’ question.
4.2 If a ‘show that’ question is worth 2 marks then both marks will be available for a reverse
working; if it is worth 3 marks then only 2 will be available.
4.3 use of the formula means that the candidate demonstrates substitution of physically correct
values, although there may be conversion errors e.g. power of 10 error.
4.4 recall of the correct formula will be awarded when the formula is seen or implied by
substitution.
4.5 The mark scheme will show a correctly worked answer for illustration only.
[If 5040 g rounded to 5000 g or 5 kg, do not give 3rd mark; if conversion to kg is omitted
and then answer fudged, do not give 3rd mark]
[Bald answer scores 0, reverse calculation 2/3]
Example of calculation
80 cm × 50 cm × 1.8 cm = 7200 cm3
7200 cm3 × 0.70 g cm-3 = 5040 g
5040 × 10-3 kg × 9.81 N/kg= 49.4 N
5. Graphs
5.1 A mark given for axes requires both axes to be labelled with quantities and units, and drawn
the correct way round.
5.2 Sometimes a separate mark will be given for units or for each axis if the units are complex.
This will be indicated on the mark scheme.
5.3 A mark given for choosing a scale requires that the chosen scale allows all points to be
plotted, spreads plotted points over more than half of each axis and is not an awkward scale
e.g. multiples of 3, 4, 7 etc.
5.4 Points should be plotted to within 1 mm.
• Check the two points furthest from the best line. If both are OK award the mark.
• If either is 2 mm out do not award mark.
• If both are 1 mm out do not award mark.
• If either is 1 mm out then check another two and award mark if both of these are OK,
otherwise no mark.
5.5 For a line mark there must be a thin continuous line which is the best-fit line for the
candidate’s results.
Question Answer Mark
Number
1 (a)(i) Mass
Or volume (of water) (1)
Time
Or distance between resistor and thermometer (1) 2
Ignore room temperature, temperature of the surroundings, size of the beaker
or insulation, potential difference
Example of calculation
Long pendulum Tl = 2π√(1.00 m/ 9.81 m s−2) = 2.01 s
Short pendulum Ts = 2π√((1.00 m − 0.25 m)/ 9.81 m s−2) = 1.74 s
T = 0.5(Tl + Ts) = 0.5(2.01 + 1.74 s) = 1.88 s = 1.9 s
Either
Light gates remove parallax error (1)
As the light gate is in fixed position (1)
Or
There would be uncertainty in the time period from the light gate (1)
As the light gate would time from edge of the bob rather than centre of mass (1) 3
Valid conclusion including comparison of calculated gradient with the stated (1) 5
expected gradient of −½
Example of calculation
gradient = (2.69 − 2.4)/(2.1 − 2.65) = − 0.29/0.55 = −0.53
4 (a)(ii) The uncertainty of a single reading is half the resolution of the metre rule,
(which is 0.5 mm) (1)
As the two readings are subtracted, the uncertainties are added (1) 2
Example of calculation
Mean d = (2.35 + 2.37 + 2.34 + 2.34 + 2.33) mm / 5 = 11.74 mm / 5
= 2.348 mm = 2.35 mm
Uncertainty = (2.37 − 2.33) mm /2 = 0.04 mm/2 = 0.02 mm
Example of calculation
G = 32 × 0.1kg × 9.81 N kg−1 × 0.589 m × (0.103 m)2
3.14159 × 0.026 m × (2.35 × 10−3 m)4
= 0.196 N m3 / 2.49 × 10−12 m5
= 7.87 × 1010 (N m−2)
= 7.9 × 1010 (N m−2)
4 (d) Use of 2× %U in x Or 4× %U in d shown (1)
Calculation of correct value of %U in G e.c.f. (b)(iii) (1)
Correct value of relevant limits from %U e.c.f. (c) (1)
Valid conclusion based on comparison of relevant limits with data (1)
Example of calculation
%U = (0.1 / 58.9) × 100 + 2 × (0.1 / 10.3) × 100 + (1 / 26) × 100
+ 4 × (0.02 / 2.35) × 100
= 0.17% + 2 × 0.97% + 3.85% + 4 × 0.85%
= 0.17% + 1.94% + 3.85% + 3.40%
= 9.36% = 9.4%
Upper limit = 78.7 × 109 N m2 × (1+0.094) = 86.1 × 109 N m2
Lower limit = 78.7 × 109 N m2 × (1 − 0.094) = 71.3 × 109 N m2
As both values fall within this range, the student cannot determine which type of
steel the rod is made from.
Or
(1)
Use of uncertainties to calculate maximum or minimum shown
(1)
Calculation of correct value of upper limit
(1)
Calculation of correct value of lower limit
(1)
Valid conclusion based on comparison of relevant limit with data
Example of calculation
Upper limit G = 32 × 0.1kg × 9.81Nkg−1 × (0.589+0.001)m × ((0.103+0.001)m)2
3.14159 × (0.026−0.01) m × ((2.35−0.02) × 10−3 m)4
= 0.200 N m3 / 2.31 × 10−12 m5
= 8.68 × 1010 (N m−2)
Lower limit G = 32 × 0.1kg × 9.81Nkg−1 × (0.589−0.001)m × ((0.103−0.001)m)2
3.14159 × (0.026+0.01) m × ((2.35+0.02) × 10−3 m)4
= 0.192 N m3 / 2.68 × 10−12 m5
= 7.16 × 1010 (N m−2)
As both values fall within this range, the student cannot determine which type of
steel the rod is made from.
Or (1)
Use of 2× %U in x Or 4× %U in d shown (1)
Calculation of correct value of %U in G e.c.f. (b)(iii) (1)
Correct calculation of relevant %D shown e.c.f. (c) (1) 4
Valid conclusion based on comparison of relevant %D with %U
Example of calculation
%U = (0.1 / 58.9) × 100 + 2 × (0.1 / 10.3) × 100 + (1 / 26) × 100
+ 4 × (0.02 / 2.35) × 100
= 0.17% + 2 × 0.97% + 3.85% + 4 × 0.85%
= 0.17% + 1.94% + 3.85% + 3.40%
= 9.36% = 9.4%
%D for structural steel = (78.7 − 79.3)/79.3 × 100 = 0.76 %
%D for carbon steel = (78.7 − 77)/77 × 100 = 2.3%
As % D for both structural and carbon steel are less than the %U, the student
cannot determine which type of steel the rod is made from.