Asian Development Bank
Asian Development Bank
Asian Development Bank
TA 7327
March 2012
This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and
ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical
assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design.
KOLKATA URBAN SECTOR INVESTMENT PLAN
(2012-2022)
VOLUME 1
FINAL REPORT
March 2012
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Table of Contents
1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1
2 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1
3 Scope of the project ..................................................................................................... 1
4 Kolkata Metropolitan Area ............................................................................................ 3
5 Kolkata Municipal Corporation ..................................................................................... 4
5.1 Administrative area ...................................................................................................... 4
5.2 KMC spatial development pattern ................................................................................ 6
6 Population .................................................................................................................... 6
6.1 Current population........................................................................................................ 6
6.2 Population characteristics and trends .......................................................................... 7
6.3 Population projection.................................................................................................. 13
7 KMC Urban service provision benchmarking ............................................................. 17
7.1 KMC 2011 baseline benchmark summary status ...................................................... 17
7.2 Water supply sub-sector benchmark status ............................................................... 20
7.2.1 Water supply main system characteristics ................................................................. 20
7.2.2 Water supply baseline service levels as compared to benchmarks .......................... 21
7.3 Sewerage and drainage sub-sector benchmark status ............................................. 22
7.3.1 Sewerage and drainage main system characteristics ............................................... 22
7.3.2 Sewerage and drainage baseline service levels as compared to benchmarks ......... 26
7.4 Solid Waste Management sub-sector benchmark status .......................................... 27
7.4.1 Solid Waste Management main system characteristics ............................................ 27
7.4.2 Solid Waste Management baseline service levels as compared to benchmarks ...... 28
8. Water supply service plan .......................................................................................... 30
8.1 Water supply baseline 2011....................................................................................... 30
8.2 Water supply service targets and service gaps ......................................................... 32
9. Sewerage and drainage service plan......................................................................... 37
9.1. Sewerage and drainage baseline 2011 ..................................................................... 37
9.2. Sewerage and drainage service targets and service gaps ........................................ 41
10. Solid Waste Management service plan...................................................................... 46
10.1 Solid Waste Management baseline 2011 .................................................................. 46
10.2 Solid Waste Management service targets and service gaps ..................................... 48
i
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
List of Annexes
Annex A. Population by ward (1-141) and borough (I-XV) ............................................................ 54
Annex B. Population densities in people per km2 by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV).............. 58
Annex C. Slum population by ward (1-141) and borough (I-XV) ................................................... 62
Annex D. Households by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV) ........................................................ 66
ii
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
AP Affected Person
BGL Below Ground Level
BM Bench Mark
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
BPL Below Poverty Line
BPR Business Process Engineering
BPS Booster Pumping Stations
BSNL Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
BSR Basic Schedule Rates
BSUP Basic Services for Urban Poor
BUDIP Bihar Urban Development Investment Program
CaCo3 Calcium Carbonate
CAGR Compounded Annual Growth Rate
CAPEX Capital Expenditure
CBP Capacity Building Program
CC Core Calcutta
CDP City Development Plan
CF Clariflocculators
CGWB Central Ground Water Board
CH Chemical House
CI Cast Iron
CMFA Controller of Municipal Finance and Accounts, KMC
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
CPHEEO Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation
cum/hr Cubic Meter Per Hour
cum/m3 Cubic Meter
CWPS Clear Water Pumping Station
CWR Clear Water Reservoir
DA Dearness Allowance
DCRB Death Cum Retirement Benefit
DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
DFID Department for International Development, Government of United Kingdom
DH Diamond Harbour
DI Ductile Iron
dia. Diameter
DO Dissolved Oxygen
DSC Design & Supervision Consultants
DWF Dry Weather Flows
EA Executing Agency
EC Empowered Committee
ECBA Economic and Cost Benefit Analysis
EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return
EKW East Kolkata Wetlands
EPF Employees Provident Fund
ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
ESI Employees State Insurance
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FFA Framework Financing Agreement
a
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
b
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
c
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
d
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Project background
The works under KEIP Phase 1 are in progress and will be completed by 30 June 2012, the
closing date of the ADB KEIP Phase 1 loans (1813-IND and 2293-IND). Both KMC and ADB wish
to continue their combined efforts to improve the urban environment and living conditions in
Kolkata, building on results achieved and experience gained. Therefore, a second phase of the
KEIP project is now proposed, which will be named the Second Kolkata Environmental
Improvement Project (KEIP Phase 2). The ADB has expressed its willingness to support the
KEIP Phase 2 by providing a new project loan in the amount of US$90 million. Continuation of
ADB loan support for the third and fourth phase of the KEIP depends on achievements during
KEIP Phase 2.
For loan processing a number of documents must be prepared at a standard acceptable to the
ADB. In order to meet the ADB requirements the KMC, assisted by its Project Management
Consultants (PMC), has prepared the Kolkata Urban Sector Investment Plan 2012-2022,
consisting of four volumes:
Volume 1: The urban service plan (this report)
Volume 2: The investment plan
Volume 3: Economic and financial aspects
Volume 4: Environmental and social safeguards frameworks
Furthermore the KMC has prepared Sub-project Appraisal Reports (SAR) for KEIP Phase 2 sub-
projects in accordance with ADB requirements for the sub-sectors:
• Water supply
• Sewerage and drainage
2. KEIP Objectives
I
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Total KEIP Phase 2 investment envisaged is US$128.57 million, based on 70% ADB financing
($90 million) and 30% KMC and State Government financing ($38.57 million). The project will
address urban service needs in the water supply sub-sector and the sewerage and drainage sub-
sector.
The maximum project period is 5 years (2012-2017) but considering the urgent need to improve
urban service provision and infrastructure the KMC intends to speed up implementation of the
project to ensure that the people of Kolkata will enjoy the benefits of the project as soon as
possible. Based on experience gained during the ongoing project the KMC is confident that the
entire KEIP Phase 2 can be implemented within a period of 4 years meaning that the Phase 2
project period will be from 2012 to 2016.
4. Population
Kolkata is a sprawling metropolis. The larger Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA) covers an area of
1,851km2 and according to the Census had a total population in year 2001 of 14,720,000 people.
In terms of population the Kolkata Metropolitan Area belongs to the world’s top ten megacities.
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) is the centre of the metropolis and covers a total area
of 187 km2 which is just over 10% of the metropolitan area.
According to the provisional 2011 Census results the KMC population stands at a total of
4,484,484 people down from 4,572,876 in 2001. This means an actual population decrease
compared to 2001 of 88,392 people (-1.93%). The city centre is very densely populated.
Densities between 50,000 and 60,000 people per km2 are quite common in the central wards of
the KMC and in some wards the density is even higher than 100,000 people per km2. This is
extremely high by all standards. Because of these cramped living conditions people have
increasingly settled in the urban fringe areas where population is growing fast. Meanwhile the
central city boroughs of KMC experience population decline. These trends are expected to
continue in the future. For the period 2011- 2022 modest overall population increase is projected
of 1.7% which brings the total KMC population at 4,560,887 people in 2022.
Decreasing population densities, declining household sizes and increasing gender ratios have
consistently been recorded since the 1991 Census, indicating that the living conditions in Kolkata
are steadily improving. Nevertheless, approximately one third of the Kolkata population
(1,485,309 people) lives in slums.
The Hand Book of Service Level Benchmarking of the Ministry of Urban Development,
Government of India, defines national benchmark targets for urban service provision. Overall it
appears that KMC still has a long way to go to arrive at the national service level targets.
However, compared to the national averages (as far as available) KMC compares in general
positive. For some of the benchmarks there is a big difference in service levels within the KMC
area. The water supply service level is distinctly different for the various water supply zones. The
sewerage and drainage service level in the central city area is distinctly different from the service
quality in some of the outer areas where a formal underground sewer system simply does not
exist.
II
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
In the urban service plan the baseline levels of urban service provision in KMC have been
determined and realistic targets for 2017 and 2022 have been set to arrive at improved service
delivery, in line with national benchmark targets. The following tables summarize the plan for
urban service delivery.
Besides service level assessments, the urban service plan also includes an assessment of
current infrastructure and equipment used for service delivery and set targets for 2017 and 2022
for improvements needed in terms of quantity and quality.
III
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
IV
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
1 Background
The original project was for $360 million including $250 million from an Asian Development Bank
(ADB) loan. Financing is from the KMC, the Government of West Bengal (GoWB) and the ADB.
In addition there is grant financing from the UK Department for International Development (DFID)
for the KMC capacity building component of the Project. The Executive Agencies of the Project
are KMC and GoWB Irrigation and Waterways Department (IWD).
The original ADB loan (Loan 1813-IND) of US$250 million was approved on 19 December 2000.
After cancellation of $72.2 million from the original loan, a supplementary loan (Loan 2293-IND)
of $80 million was approved and became effective on 1 June 2007. The closing date of these two
loans with a total amount of $257.8 million has been extended to 30 June 2012.
The works under KEIP Phase 1 are in progress and will be completed by mid 2012. Both KMC
and ADB wish to continue their combined efforts to improve the urban environment and living
conditions in Kolkata, building on results achieved and experience gained. Therefore, a second
phase of KEIP is now proposed, which will be named the Second Kolkata Environmental
Improvement Project (KEIP Phase 2). The ADB has expressed its willingness to support the
KEIP Phase 2 by providing a new project loan in the amount of US$90 million. Successful
implementation of the second phase may result in co-financing of a third and fourth phase of the
KEIP by ADB.
2 Objectives
Total KEIP Phase 2 investment envisaged is US$128.57 million, based on 70% ADB financing
($90 million) and 30% KMC and State Government financing ($38.57 million). The maximum
project period is 5 years but considering the urgent need to improve urban service provision and
infrastructure the KMC intends to speed up implementation of the project to ensure that the
people of Kolkata will enjoy the benefits of the project as soon as possible. Based on experience
gained during the ongoing project the KMC is confident that the entire KEIP Phase 2 can be
1
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
implemented within a period of 4 years meaning that the Phase 2 project period will be from 2012
to 2016. Continuation of ADB loan support for subsequent KEIP Phases 3 and 4 depends on
achievements during the second phase. Assuming successful project implementation in Phase 2,
the third KEIP Phase could be implemented in the period 2015-2019 and Phase 4 in period 2018-
2022, meaning that the various Phases will have some overlap.
The ongoing KEIP Phase 1 is mainly focused on the sewerage and drainage sub-sector in the
outer areas of the city. KEIP Phase 2 continues improving and extending sewerage and drainage
systems, but will also include a substantial water supply sub-sector component.
The Investment Plan 2012-2022 covering KEIP Phase 2, 3 and 4 (refer to Volume 2 of the
Kolkata Urban Sector Investment Plan), even has a much wider scope and addresses urban
service needs in the Water Supply, the Sewerage & Drainage, and the Solid Waste Management
sub-sectors. The focus is on the 10 year plan period 2012-2022, but investment needs beyond
2022 that have been identified in these sub-sectors are included as well. The investment plan is a
combination of:
• Physical investment, through subprojects falling into the agreed subsectors of urban services
in the investment plan.
• Non-physical investment, such as regulatory and institutional reforms to make best use of the
physical investment, and capacity building to enable the urban service policy makers and
providers to achieve the reforms.
For loan processing a number of documents must be prepared at a standard acceptable to the
ADB. In order to meet the ADB requirements the KMC, assisted by its Project Management
Consultants (PMC), has prepared the Kolkata Urban Sector Investment Plan 2012-2022,
consisting of four volumes:
Volume 1: The urban service plan (this report)
Volume 2: The investment plan
Volume 3: Economic and financial aspects
Volume 4: Environmental and social safeguards frameworks
Furthermore the KMC has prepared Sub-project Appraisal Reports (SAR) for KEIP Phase 2 sub-
projects in accordance with ADB requirements for the sub-sectors:
• Water supply
• Sewerage and drainage
2
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Kolkata is a city with a history dating back to 1686, when the British East India Company set up a
trading settlement on the banks of the Hooghly River. Although Kolkata soon became a thriving
trading place, it remained a relatively small village for a long time. In 1710 the settlement had a
population of approximately 12,000 people. Later in the 18th century the British took control over
large parts of Bengal and Kolkata gained importance as the centre of power in British India. In
1772 Kolkata became the capital of British India.
During the 19th century the position of Kolkata grew steadily more important. Bengali literature
and culture flourished and many buildings constructed during this century reflect the wealth and
importance of the city. The population increased from a mere 45,000 in the year 1757 to 187,000
in the year 1831 and by the turn of the century in 1901 the population had reached a total number
of 848,000.
In 1911 the British decided to relocate the capital from Kolkata to Delhi. This was an economic
drawback for the development of the city and growth levels declined. Nevertheless the population
reached a total of more than one million (1,030,000) in the year 1921 and continued to grow.
Another major event with a high impact on the development of Kolkata was the partition of India
in 1947. The city lost direct access to large parts of its natural hinterland and besides had to cope
with a huge influx of refugees from East Pakistan. The war between India and Pakistan in 1971
caused another wave of refugees arriving in Kolkata. The impact in terms of housing shortages,
overcrowding, poverty and overloaded infrastructure and urban services has been felt for a long
time after.
Nowadays, Kolkata is a sprawling metropolis. The larger Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA) covers
an area of 1,851km2 and according to the Census had a total population in year 2001 of
14,720,000 people, which implies an average density of 7950 persons per sq.km.
In terms of population the Kolkata Metropolitan Area belongs to the world’s top ten megacities.
The 2008 UN-Habitat report ranks the Kolkata Metropolitan Area as the eighth largest megacity in
the world.
3
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The Kolkata Metropolitan Area has mainly developed in a linear North-South pattern along both
banks of Hooghly River. In the early days of Kolkata the Hooghly was the main transport artery
and all activities focused on the river. In subsequent years the construction of two railway lines
and more recently two highways on both river banks all running more or less parallel to the river
have further shaped the urban growth process. The wetlands in the East have restricted the
development potential in Eastern direction. The resulting urbanization pattern is a predominantly
linear form extending along the Hooghly River from KMC to Kalyani on the East Bank and from
Howrah to Tribeni on the West Bank of the river.
The topography of the Kolkata Metropolitan Area is mainly flat and the average elevation is just
5m above sea level. On the West Bank the land slopes towards the Hooghly River. On the East
Bank the land slopes in the reverse direction, away from the river and down to the low laying
marshes and wetlands to the East. The Hooghly is a branch of the mighty Ganges River. From
Kolkata the Hooghly winds its way to the South where it flows in to the Bay of Bengal
approximately 120km from Kolkata. At high tide the flow in the Hooghly River reverses and even
at 120km from the sea the current flowing North in the reverse direction can be very strong. The
tidal fluctuation is approximately 4m in the monsoon season and 2.75m during the dry season.
During the monsoon season, lasting from mid June to early October, the combination of high tide
and high rainfall often results in water logging in large parts of the urban area. Especially the
Howrah Municipal Corporation on the Hooghly West-bank suffers from flooding caused by
backflow. On the East Bank, in the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) area, backflow of river
water only causes problems in some low-laying places near the Hooghly and along some of the
smaller rivers in the city that have an open connection with the Hooghly. In the KMC area most of
the storm water drains to the East through a system of channels that carry the storm water to the
vast protected East Kolkata Wetlands before it finally discharges 36km from the city into the Kulti
River which flows to the Bay of Bengal.
Kolkata is the capital of the State of West Bengal, and is the main port of entry in North Eastern
India. Kolkata is located at 22O30’ North Latitude, 88O30’ East Longitude. Administratively the
urban area of the Kolkata Metropolitan Area is subdivided in 3 Municipal Corporations, 38
Municipalities, and a large number of smaller administrative units called Panchayat Samities.
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) is the centre of the metropolis and covers a total area
of 187 km2 which is just over 10% of the metropolitan area (refer to figure below). The KMC area
has grown over the years by annexation of suburban areas. The 1899 Calcutta Municipal Act
defined the administrative domain of the municipal authority as covering 25 wards and 48.5km2.
Many boundary changes followed, the latest one in January 1984 when boroughs XI, XII, XIII, XIV
and XV were annexed to the KMC. These boroughs are popularly known as the “added areas”.
Since these latest additions, the jurisdiction of KMC now covers 15 boroughs which are
subdivided in 141 wards as shown in the figure below.
4
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
5
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
From the early days the economy of Kolkata has always been based on industry and trade
together with related commercial activities and financial services. In the central business district
most government offices are located, often in heritage buildings dating back to colonial days. The
old part of the city accommodates many commercial activities and services such as shops,
markets, banks, hotels and offices. Important heritage buildings and cultural objects such as the
Victoria Memorial, the Indian Museum, the High Court, Writer’s Building, the Town Hall, St. Paul’s
Cathedral and the Marble Palace are also found in and around the core area.
The construction of the Eastern Bypass Road (1982-1986) opened-up new developable land and
this initiated development in the near vicinity of this major arterial road. Especially high-rise
apartment blocks, shopping malls, hotels, schools and hospitals have been constructed recently
and more development is expected in the near future. The Eastern wards of KMC have the
highest development potential. The Southern wards come second in potential. This is mainly
because of available land and access. The ongoing expansion of the metro rail transit system to
the East and South will further increase the development potential of these areas.
In the more central parts of the KMC vacant land is near to non-existent but redevelopment does
take place and this provides opportunities for urban renewal and further intensification of land use.
Often this means that residential blocks will be converted into commercial land uses, resulting in
an increased focus on commercial activities and services and a shift of population from the
central parts of the city to the urban fringes.
It should be noted that the KMC intends to protect the old colonial core area from redevelopment
that would adversely impact the heritage values. This policy limits the redevelopment potential but
will also mean a tremendous increase of the economic potential of this old town area especially in
terms of recreation and tourism with related activities such as hotels, restaurants, museums,
shops, etc.
6 Population
Detailed population data are available from the Census that is held every ten years. The latest
Census was in 2011 but only some results have so far been published. The following table shows
the provisional 2011 Census data on KMC population by borough subdivided over male, female
and other. The 2011 Census data on slum population, households and household size are not yet
available and therefore the baseline shown in the table is from the 2001 Census. Detailed data
per ward are presented in the annexes to this report.
6
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Households
Household
Population
Population
Population
Population
population
Area km2
Borough
Surface
Density
Density
Female
Other
Slum
Male
size
I 9,57 325649 34027 152520 67147 4,85 306407 159320 147055 32 32016
II 3,27 236767 72390 64448 47314 5,00 202567 107753 94811 3 61934
III 9,42 341876 36293 212262 71090 4,81 365008 189107 175893 8 38748
IV 3,35 278255 82957 78688 50387 5,52 243105 140043 103060 2 72478
V 5,33 262353 49256 54685 45685 5,74 222752 137291 85454 7 41821
VI 5,56 313638 56399 55179 55147 5,69 253285 138206 115070 9 45546
VII 25,89 505358 19516 403433 95389 5,30 534562 282144 252395 23 20644
VIII 9,90 296663 29976 48871 64502 4,60 252457 130982 121473 2 25509
IX 19,42 364354 18759 161696 72441 5,03 341767 183677 158067 23 17596
X 15,71 406935 25900 65833 93653 4,35 389059 194228 194827 4 24763
XI 12,41 201040 16204 0 47395 4,24 235872 118513 117357 2 19012
XII 20,93 222145 10615 2618 53128 4,18 304845 154324 150519 2 14566
XIII 12,12 247093 20379 12480 55150 4,48 244417 123262 121155 0 20159
XIV 19,10 296044 15497 4892 69374 4,27 310508 155779 154728 1 16254
XV 8,96 274.706 30672 167.704 41.784 6,57 277.873 146.753 131.119 1 31026
Total 180,95 4.572.876 25272 1.485.309 929.586 4,92 4.484.484 2.361.382 2.122.983 119 24783
Source: Census 2001 and 2011
Note that the total area of all wards adds up to almost 181 km2. The total surface area of KMC is
187km2. The difference is explained by the surface area of Fort William, the Canals, and the
River Ports.
According to provisional 2011 Census results the West Bengal State population has grown by
13.9% in the period 2001-2011 compared to 17.8% in the period 1991-2001, indicating that
overall population growth is slowing down in line with the national trend. This is also the case for
each of the Districts in which the Kolkata Metropolitan Area is located. Nevertheless, in most of
these Districts population continues to grow fast except the KMC as illustrated in the following
table.
7
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
According to the preliminary 2011 Census results the KMC population stands at a total of
4,484,484 people down from 4,572,876 in 2001. This means an actual population decrease
compared to 2001 of 88,392 people (-1.93%) in ten years time. In the previous intra-Census
period (1991-2001) the KMC population was still growing, although at a low decennial rate of
4.28%.
The KMC covers only 10% of the total Kolkata Metropolitan Area, but accommodates 31% of the
Metropolitan population. However, the KMC share of the metropolitan population has consistently
decreased over the past decades as illustrated in the following table.
Table: Percentage distribution of the metropolitan population over the various districts
District % of KMA surface area % of KMA population
1961 1971 1981 1991 2001
KMC 10.7% 46.8% 43.2% 39.3% 34.8% 31.1%
Hooghly 21.5% 10.9% 11.5% 12.1% 12.6% 12.8%
Howrah 14.2% 15.7% 14.0% 14.5% 15.4% 15.3%
Nadia 4.6% 0.6% 0.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.3%
North 24 Parganas 25.4% 19.7% 23.2% 25.5% 27.5% 29.9%
South 24 Parganas 23.6% 6.2% 7.4% 7.6% 8.4% 9.5%
Total KMA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: City Development Plan Kolkata, KMDA, 2007
The outer urban areas of the metropolis grow much faster than the core. The centre of the
metropolis is extremely densely populated and there is very limited vacant, developable land. As
a result, over the years the growing population has increasingly settled in the urban fringe areas.
The table below illustrates that the average population density (population per square km) in KMC
is much higher than in the other parts of the Kolkata Metropolitan Area.
The above table presents average values. A closer analysis of the 141 wards within the KMC
reveals that in some wards the density is even higher than 100,000 people per km2. This is
extremely high by all standards. Densities between 50,000 and 60,000 people per km2 are quite
common in the central wards of the KMC, but also occur in borough XV which is a low income
area near the river port. The ten most densely populated wards, all with population densities
8
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
above 90.000 people per km2 in year 2011, are listed in the table below. Not surprisingly most of
the high density wards are found in the city centre, especially in borough IV.
A shift of population pressure from the centre to the urban fringes can be observed at the
metropolitan level but also at the KMC level. The central city boroughs of KMC experience
population decline and the outer boroughs population increase. This is not a new phenomenon
but the trend of shrinking population in the core city is accelerating over time as can be seen from
the growth rates since 1991 as presented in the following table, map and graph.
9
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
10
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Apparently the population densities in the central city have reached a level of saturation and
people are moving out to settle in the urban fringes. Decreasing household sizes further
contribute to the population decline because the number of people per dwelling unit declines. In
the central wards population densities also decrease because of conversion of residential land in
more commercial land uses. In contrast, most of the outer KMC boroughs still experience high
population growth. This shows that behind the overall trend of stagnation of population growth in
KMC, the detailed picture by ward and borough reveals a much more dynamic growth pattern.
The average household size in KMC decreased from 5.14 in the year 1991 to 4.92 in year 2001 in
line with the national trend for urban areas. The 2011 Census data are not yet available, but it is
likely that the decrease of average household sizes will continue. The largest households are
found in the central parts of the KMC. The Census defines households as a group of people
sharing a living space and having a common cooking place. Large households, especially in the
city centre, often consist of people sharing an apartment but not necessarily forming a family.
Central city boroughs II, IV, V, VI, VII and IX all have above average household sizes, indicating
cramped living conditions in these already congested areas.
The wards on the outskirts of the KMC still experience population growth and increasing densities.
However, with the exception of the slum areas near the River Port in Borough XV most of the
outer wards still have densities much lower than the central city and therefore these outer wards
still have potential to accommodate more people. Typically the outer wards of KMC have average
densities ranging between 15,000 and 30,000 people per km2 as illustrated in the following figure.
11
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The above figure also illustrates the uneven distribution of male and female citizens over the city
area. The 2011 KMC population consists of 52.7% men and 47.3% women. The overall KMC
gender ratio (number of females per 1000 males) is 899 in 2011 up from 829 in 2001. However,
in the centre of town the gender ratio is much lower compared to the outskirts. In the central
areas many single young men, mostly migrant workers, live in shared apartments. The outer
areas are typically inhabited by families with children. As a result the central city boroughs IV and
V house less than 750 women per 1000 men, but most of the outer wards have gender ratios well
above 900. In borough X the number of women even exceeds the number of men.
Decreasing population densities, declining household sizes and increasing gender ratios as
recorded since the 1991 Census, indicate that the living conditions in Kolkata are steadily
improving. Nevertheless, a large number of city dwellers live in slums. A 2009 survey has
identified 5,511 slums in KMC with an average population of approximately 270 people per slum.
This illustrates that in KMC slums are in general not very big but there are very many small slums
scattered over the urban area.
Since the 1991 Census the percentage of KMC population living in slums is more or less constant
at 32% of the entire population. According to the 2001 Census a total number of 1,485,309
people lived in slums, which is 32.5% of the total population. This does not mean that people are
doomed to spend their entire lives in a slum. There is surely a certain degree of social mobility.
Many slum dwellers climb the social ladder and move to formal housing areas, but their place in
the slum is taken by migrants who come from the countryside to try their luck in the big city. The
following tables summarize some of the main population characteristics and trends as described
in this section.
12
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Before the latest annexations in January 1984, KMC consisted of 10 boroughs subdivided in 100
wards. After annexation, the added areas were subdivided in 5 boroughs and 41 wards making
the current total of 15 boroughs and 141 wards. This boundary change makes it difficult to
compare KMC Census data before and after 1984. Therefore, the population projections are
based on analysis of the 1991 and 2001 Census data and provisional 2011 Census results.
The boundaries of the 141 wards have not changed since 1984. However, the boundaries of the
boroughs have been changed quite frequently by shifting wards between boroughs. The latest
changes in borough boundaries were made in August 2010. This makes it also difficult to analyse
population data on the borough level. Therefore the population analysis and projections have
been based on the ward level data and accumulated to the borough level by using the same
borough boundaries throughout the years as is also done by the Census. Note that the actual
current borough boundaries are somewhat different.
Incremental and exponential growth models are mainly used for young and fast growing cities
with almost no constraints for growth which is not applicable for KMC. Arithmetical projection is
mainly used for well-established old cities with limited growth potential and mostly saturated in
population density which is also not true for KMC. Geometrical methods are applicable for cities
with relatively large in-migration as compared to natural growth and high growth potential
combined with limited constraints for development. This method might be used for KMC. However,
the compound growth rate method, applied at the ward level is deemed most appropriate for KMC,
because the growth pattern is very diverse within the city.
Some wards show stabilization or negative growth because of saturation, and other wards still
have a high growth potential with relatively limited constraints. The inter-census population
growth data for 1991-2001 and 2001-2011 respectively show a relatively constant trend on the
ward level. Wards that experience declining growth in the period 1991-2001 mostly continue the
13
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
downward growth trend in the period 2001-2011. For quite a lot of wards this trend results in
negative growth during the last inter-census period. Wards with high growth potential, mostly in
the outer KMC areas, continue to grow throughout the entire period 1991-2011, but growth rates
are in general slowing down over the years because these wards started with very limited
population in 1991 meaning that growth percentages initially were very high but now that these
areas also have a substantial population base, the growth in absolute terms continues at the
same high levels, but the growth percentages decline. In other wards that have grown relatively
fast in the past, growth is slowing down because of physical limitations such as availability of
developable land. Some of the outer wards on the other hand still have a very large growth
potential because constraints that have hampered development until now are expected to be
removed in the future for instance by provision of infrastructure, by draining swampy marsh land,
etc. The compound growth method applied at the ward level captures this large variety in growth
dynamics best.
The compound growth method, applied at the ward level, results in a projected population of
4,560,887 people in KMC in year 2022, meaning a limited growth of 76,400 people (+1.70%%) as
compared to the 2011 population. The projection is summarized in the table below. As might be
expected, the population in the outer boroughs especially boroughs XI and XII would increase
substantially over the next ten years and the population in large parts of the core city area would
decrease.
It should be noted that projections always have a degree of uncertainty. Projections are based on
past trends and past development. However, the future may hold unexpected new economical,
technological or social developments that may change the growth perspective. For the long term
this uncertainty is bigger than for the short term. Aggregate data, such as projections for the
entire KMC area or for the boroughs, will also be more accurate than disaggregated data for
small areas such as wards. Therefore, the projections made for the period until 2022 are to be
14
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
considered as fairly realistic on the KMC level and the borough level. Disaggregate 2022
projections on the ward level will be less accurate. Projections up to year 2042 have a high
degree of uncertainty and should be seen as a long term development scenario that can serve to
test investment proposal. The table below presents the main population projections and
characteristics for year 2017 and 2022 and for base year 2011. The annexes to this report
present detailed projections per ward and for the longer term up to year 2042 in five year intervals.
15
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Households
Households
Households
people/km2
people/km2
people/km2
Household
Household
Household
Population
Population
Population
Slum pop.
Slum pop.
Slum pop.
Density in
Density in
Density in
Boroughs
size
size
size
I 306407 32016 143231 68171 4.49 296552 30987 138504 69417 4.27 289216 30220 135004 70815 4.08
II 202567 61934 55040 44086 4.59 185138 56605 50194 42929 4.31 172143 52632 46557 42374 4,06
III 365008 38748 229259 80014 4.56 380012 40341 240148 86000 4.42 393210 41742 249836 91389 4.30
IV 243105 72478 71166 47109 5.16 225812 67322 67435 45628 4.95 213218 63568 64703 44649 4.78
V 222752 41821 50346 37107 6.00 204883 38466 48433 33210 6.17 192477 36137 47152 30477 6.32
VI 253285 45546 44384 44859 5.65 224827 40429 39340 40132 5.60 204479 36770 35750 36799 5.56
VII 534562 20644 428455 100005 5.35 559101 21592 448073 104544 5.35 584265 22564 468097 109570 5.33
VIII 252457 25509 43206 58049 4.35 231213 23362 40278 55010 4.20 215828 21808 38063 52845 4.08
IX 341767 17596 154716 66965 5.10 330013 16991 151046 64066 5.15 321143 16535 148264 61847 5.19
X 389059 24763 59042 100161 3.88 382038 24316 55591 105726 3.61 378286 24077 53025 111470 3.39
XI 235872 19012 0 62660 3.76 260525 20999 0 74299 3.51 283605 22859 0 85774 3.31
XII 304845 14566 4423 83928 3.63 375367 17936 6059 112785 3.33 450856 21543 7875 145952 3.09
XIII 244417 20159 11397 59376 4.12 244244 20144 10806 62744 3.89 244901 20199 10457 66091 3.71
XIV 310508 16254 4679 79816 3.89 320841 16795 4556 87399 3.67 330473 17300 4458 94617 3.49
XV 277.873 31026 167.805 39.958 6.95 281.971 31.483 168.780 39.725 7.10 286.791 32.022 170.165 39.999 7.17
Total 4,484,484 24783 1,467,149 972,264 4.61 4,502,540 24,883 1,469,243 1,023,612 4.40 4,560,887 25,206 1,479,406 1,084,668 4.20
16
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The Hand Book of Service Level Benchmarking of the Ministry of Urban Development,
Government of India, defines national benchmark targets for urban service provision. The 2011
status of the overall level of KMC service provision in the various sub-sectors as compared to the
major national benchmarks is summarized in the tables overleaf. A detailed description of current
and targeted service levels by subsector is provided in the subsequent chapters 8, 9 and 10.
Overall it appears that KMC still has a long way to go to arrive at the national service level targets.
However, compared to the national averages (as far as available) KMC compares in general
positive. For some of the benchmarks there is a big difference in service levels within the KMC
area. The water supply service level is distinctly different for the various water supply zones,
respectively supplied from Palta, Garden Reach, Jorabagan and Watgaunge Water Treatment
Plants or by ground water supply. The sewerage and drainage service level in the central city
area is distinctly different from the service quality in the outer areas. Therefore the tables overleaf
present a breakdown by service area for each of the major sub-sector service level indicators.
17
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Table: Overall baseline level of urban service provision sub-sector water supply
Indicator Unit National National Palta Garden Ground Jorabagan Watgaunge Other Total
Benchmark1 2
Average Reach water KMC
Population 2011 2,178,788 1,452,102 639,707 103,907 109,980 NA 4,484,484
Surface area km2 62.75 67.20 44.32 1.85 4.84 6.06 187
Water supply coverage % 100% 81% 100% 95% 75% 100% 100% NA 92%
Per capita supply of water lpcd 150 123 144 136 90 140 139 NA 134
Daily supply hours hrs 24 hours 4 hours 11 5 6 7 7 NA 8
Metered connections % 100% 25% 0.10% 0.10% 0% 0.10% 0.10% NA 0,10%
Unaccounted for water (UFW) % 20% 32% 45% 40% 35% 35% 35% NA 40%
Quality of water supplied % 100% NA 100% 100% 70% 100% 100% NA 98%
Complaints handling % 80% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 95%
1. Hand Book of service level benchmarking, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India
2. Other areas are the Army Fort, Canals, the Port for sea going vessels and the Port for inland vessels.
18
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Table: Overall baseline level of urban service provision sub-sectors sewerage, drainage and solid waste
Bench Mark Details Unit National National Core City Area Outer Area Other Outer Total KMC
Benchmark1 Average under KEIP Areas
Phase 1
Population 2011 2,490,245 1,494,240 499,999 4,484,484
Surface area Km2 85 65 37 187
Sewerage sub-sector
Sewerage Coverage % 100% 28% 75% 22% 0% 44%
Population with Toilets % 100% 82% 98% 94% 90% 96%
Sewage collection efficiency % 100% NA 90% 90% 0% 71%
Sewage treatment capacity % 100% NA 100% 100% 0% 88%
Sewage treatment quality % 100% NA 100% 100% NA 100%
Extent of re-use/recycling % 20% NA 100% 95% 0% 93%
Complaints handling % 80% NA NA NA NA 65%
Drainage sub-sector
Drainage coverage % 100% 53% 100% 100% 0% 80%
Water logging/year 0 NA <12 <6 >12 >6
Solid Waste sub-sector
Door-to-door collection % 100% 51% 80% 70% 60% 75%
Collection efficiency % 100% NA 98% 96% 95% 97%
Waste segregation % 100% NA 5% 3% 1% 4%
Waste recovery % 80% NA 22% 20% 15% 20%
Scientific solid waste disposal % 100% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Complaints handling % 80% NA NA NA NA 54%
1. Hand Book of service level benchmarking, Ministry of Urban Development; Government of India
19
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The existing water supply system in Kolkata city is very old. It was commissioned during the British
period and is under operation since 1865. Over the years, the system was extended and augmented
in stages to meet the increasing urbanization and related water demand. The water supply system
consists of 4 water treatment plants using surface water from the Hooghly River as raw water source,
transmission, storage and distribution to different parts of the city. A part of the city is served by
abstraction of ground water by several tube wells. There are 2 major water treatment plants. Palta
Water Treatment Plant serves most the northern and central boroughs and Garden Reach Water
Treatment Plant serves most of the southern boroughs. Two smaller plants Jorabagan and
Watgaunge, both serve a limited number of wards in the western KMC area near the Hooghly River.
About 10% of supply is from ground water. The table below summarizes the main features by supply
zone and the figure shows the location of the various supply zones.
20
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Metered connections
Bulk water is supplied to commercial and institutional units and also to domestic apartment blocks.
Bulk water supply connections are all metered. None of the domestic connections in KMC is currently
metered. This means that the total number of metered connections is less than 1% which is far below
the national average of 20%.
21
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
government standards and the national benchmark. However, at the consumer end loss of quality is
likely because of intrusion of contamination in the system due to limited supply hours and pressure
loss in the system, combined with widespread use of private water storage (rooftop) tanks.
Complaints handling
Efficiency in redressing customer complaints is facilitated by the KMC e-governance initiative which is
operational since 2010. Records and handling times are improving as a result. Currently it is
estimated that 95% of complaints received about the water supply service are satisfactorily redressed
within 24 hours, which is above the national benchmark target of 80%.
An organized underground sewer network was first introduced in Kolkata in 1859 covering the core
city areas located to the north of Dharmatala Street (presently Lenin Sarani) and west of Upper
Circular Road (today’s Acharya Prafulla Chandra Roy Road), south of Circular Canal (Maratha ditch)
and east of Hooghly River. The area coverage of the underground drainage system at that time was
19 sq km. Subsequently, the areas located to the west of Upper Circular Road were also covered with
an underground drainage network. Development of an underground drainage network for southerly
areas was undertaken at the end of 19th century. During the second quarter of the 20th century, the
eastern part of the city, known as Manicktala area was sewered. The sewers constructed then were
mostly egg-shaped and of brick masonry construction. Up to the present day, sewers constructed in
that period are serving as the trunk mains for the city. This underground sewer system nowadays
covers the entire centre of the city (boroughs II-X) with a surface area of 85km2.
With progress of time, area coverage under Kolkata Municipal Corporation has increased. The last
municipal boundary change was in January 1984 when boroughs XI-XV were annexed. These large
annexed areas were until recently in general devoid of an organized underground drainage network.
Wherever underground sewers existed, they were mostly of inadequate carrying capacity. Areas
without underground drainage facilities are normally covered by a septic tank arrangement, with
effluent discharged to surface drains.
The ongoing KEIP Phase 1 project has constructed a combined sewer/drainage network in a large
part (65 km2) of these outer areas (boroughs I and XI-XV). However, 37km2 of the KMC outer areas
has not yet been provided with proper drainage/sewerage. The figure below shows the extent of
coverage of the central city system (white areas) the coverage of KEIP Phase 1 (brown areas) and
the KMC areas which are still devoid of an underground sewer system (green areas).
22
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The entire KMC area may broadly be divided into two river catchments: the Hooghly River system
and the Kulti River system. Although the Hooghly River is flowing along the entire western boundary
of the city, the natural gradient of the city is east meaning that storm runoff from only a small portion
of the city discharges to the River Hooghly. Overall approximately 90% of the KMC area drains to the
East Kolkata Wetlands and the Kulti River system and 10% drains to the Hoogly River.
The KMC can be subdivided into nine major drainage basins viz. Kolkata Basin, Manicktala Basin,
Tolly’s Nullah basin, Topsia - Tangra Basin, Hooghly Basin, Bagjola Basin, Tollygunge -
Panchannagram (TP) Basin, Monikhali Basin and Churial Basin. The major drainage basins are
shown in the figure overleaf.
23
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Kolkata Municipal Corporation has a combined sewerage and drainage system. Both the wastewater
from residential and commercial establishments and rainwater flows into the same network of
underground pipes. During the dry season the sewer network carries wastewater only. The
wastewater flows to sewage pumping stations from where it is pumped to the fringes of the town.
Most of the wastewater that is collected in this way (about 90%) receives no formal treatment and is
pumped into dedicated channels that lead into the East Kolkata Wetlands (EKW). Here the
wastewater is used as feeding material in fish farms that cover an area of approximately 4000
hectares. These fish farms effectively function as waste stabilization ponds. After passing through the
EKW the water flows to outfall channels that end up in the Kulti River.
The remaining 10% of the city’s wastewater is pumped into three sewage treatment plants: Bangur
STP in the north, South-Suburban East STP in the south and Garden Reach STP in the west. Here
the wastewater is treated before it is disposed in large drainage canals and on into the Hoogly River.
During periods of rains the sewer network also carries storm water. Normally this mix of wastewater
and rain water is pumped to the same fish ponds and the three treatment plants. However, at times of
heavy rainfall the sewage pumping stations are too small to handle the large flows. Because, at such
instances, the wastewater is very much diluted (about 90% to 95% of the mix is rainwater) it is
allowed to flow into storm water canals without treatment. There are two types of provisions. Firstly,
there are large storm water pumping stations at a few strategic locations, such as at Ballygunge,
Palmar Bazar and Dhapa Lock. Secondly, at many locations along the banks of the drainage canals,
there are gravity outfalls. During periods of heavy and prolonged rain the sewer networks fill up with
water. The gravity outfalls are designed in such a manner that the water can overflow from the sewer
network into the canals before the water can spill into the streets. The figure overleaf shows the main
features of the Kolkata sewerage and drainage system.
24
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
25
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Sewerage coverage
The Hand Book of service level benchmarking of the Ministry of Urban Development defines
sewerage coverage as the total number of properties with direct connection to an underground sewer
network as compared to the total number of properties. This definition excludes all people that use a
communal toilet facility such as in slum areas. It also excludes all properties where sewage is
discharged into surface drains that are connected to a collector sewer and a sewage treatment facility.
The latter two categories are substantial in KMC. In the core city area all properties, except the slums,
are directly connected to the underground sewer network, meaning a total number of 358,750
households directly connected which is equivalent to 75% of all households in the core city area. The
slum areas are in general served by communal toilets connected to septic tanks. In the outer areas
served by KEIP Phase 1 a total number of 70,000 house connections would be constructed once the
project is finalized in June 2012. This means a coverage of 22% of the total population in the KEIP
Phase 1 areas. In the outer areas not yet served house connections to underground sewers don’t
exist by lack of any underground sewer system, meaning 0% coverage. This brings the average total
for the entire KMC area at 44% as compared to the national target level of 100% but nevertheless it is
way above the national average of 28%.
Extent of re-use/recycling
The extent of re-use is very high because 90% of all sewage from KMC ends up in the fisheries of the
EKW where it serves as quality food for the fisheries. Effluent from other treatment facilities is partially
26
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
re-used for agricultural purposes before it finally discharges into the Hooghly River. On average 93%
of waste water generated in KMC is re-used, comparing very favourable to the national target of 20%.
Complaints handling
KMC daily receives around 7-10 complaints concerning the sewer system and approximately 65% is
redressed within 24 hours. Since 2010 KMC uses an e-complaint handling system as part of the e-
governance drive facilitating proper recording and handling of complaints.
Drainage coverage
The storm water drainage network in KMC covers 100% of the central city area of 85km2 and 100%
of the added areas is covered by KEIP Phase 1 (65km2). The total KMC surface area is 187km2,
meaning that overall coverage of the drainage network now extends to 80% of the KMC (150km2 out
of 187km2). This compares favourably to the national average coverage of 53% but is still 20% short
of the national target of 100% storm water drainage coverage.
27
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Collection system
The majority (90%) of collection is done by KMC and 10% is contracted out to private contractors.
House-to-house (doorstep) collection has been introduced in 75% of the KMC area. Other areas are
served by street sweepers who operate manually. Many roads are too narrow to allow access for
motorized collection vehicles. Primary collection is mostly by open hand carts and delivery at
secondary collection sites (vats). There are 694 such collection points – 392 open vats and 302 bulk
containers or direct loading. Open vats are generally poorly managed with spillage of disposed waste
from the bulk containers or from open vat boundaries creating in most cases an unhygienic
environment. In 2011 source segregation has been introduced as a pilot project in 7 wards.
Transportation system
From secondary collection sites the waste is transported in trucks to the final disposal site. KMC
transports 30% of waste, while 70% of solid waste transportation is contracted out to the private
sector. Private contractors mostly use open trucks with a tarpaulin covering the waste. They make
about 600 trips per day carrying an average of about 5.5 MT per trip. The remaining 30% of the total
collected waste is transported by municipal vehicles making about 315 daily trips carrying on average
about 3.5-4.9 MT per trip. KMC has 125 tipper trucks and 137 dumper placers, 15 tractor trailers, 17
wheel loaders and 12 mechanical sweepers, 32 street sweeping/washing vehicles and 8 wrecker
vans daily in operation. KMC has eight garages where transportation vehicles are stationed. Major vat
points that accommodate garbage more than 30 MT are serviced from Dhapa garage with Pay
loaders and 11 m3 capacity Tipper Trucks. Other vats are serviced by manual loading vehicles and
Dumper placers. The street washing vehicles clean major thoroughfares every day. Three of the
refuse collector vehicles are engaged for cleaning wastes from 300 trash bins along sixteen major
roads.
Disposal
KMC has two waste disposal sites. The Garden Reach dumping ground is a small facility with little
remaining capacity. It receives currently about 10 MT/day of waste mainly from borough XV nearby.
The main dumping ground is at Dhapa in the east of KMC at approximately 8 km from the city centre.
This dump site is nearing its maximum capacity and has been authorized by West Bengal Pollution
Control Board to operate for one more year only. It received an average of 4286 MT/day solid waste
in 2011 out of which 300 MT/day was diverted to the privately operated Dhapa composting plant.
Door-to-door collection
In 2011 75% of the KMC area is served by a door-to-door collection system and 25% by street
sweeping. This compares favorably to the national average of 51% but is still far below the 100%
benchmark target. In the core city area 80% of the population is served by door-to-door collection. In
the outer areas this is less (60% - 70%). Collection frequency also differs. The central city and most
of the surrounding outer areas are served daily, but some of the lower density fringe areas are only
served once or twice per week.
Collection efficiency
KMC estimates that only 3% of waste generated is not collected but (illegally) disposed in channels,
vacant land and used for infill, meaning that collection efficiency is close to the national benchmark
target of 100%.
28
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Waste segregation
In 2011 source segregation has been introduced as a pilot project in 7 wards (33, 47, 64, 103, 110,
115 and 130) covering only 4.4 % of the KMC population.
Waste recovery
Informal segregation takes place at all stages of waste processing. Status baseline 2011 is 13%
recycling and 7% composting making a total of 20%. Compared to the national target benchmark of
80% KMC still has a long way to go. In the central city area the level of waste recovery is higher (22%)
than in the outer urban areas (15%). Recycling is mainly practiced informally by rag pickers. The
privately operated composting plant at Dhapa processes 300 tonnes of biodegradable waste per day,
mainly collected from markets.
Complaints handling
Total number of complaints redressed within 24 hours as percentage of total complaints received
currently is 54% as per information received from KMC. This is short of the 80% national benchmark
target.
29
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Per capita water 134 lpcd Total water supplied at the consumer end in KMC is 599MLD. Total
supply population is 4,484,484. Per capita supply of water is 599,000,000 /
4,484,484 = 134 lpcd.
Extent of Non- 40% The extent of non-revenue water is assumed to be around 40% in
revenue water 2011, but is difficult to estimate because of overall lack of monitoring
data. The various supply zones have different levels of technical
losses. According to KMC officials main losses are in the distribution
system at the yard/house connection level and the public stand
posts. Technical loss (or real loss) is estimated at 30% consisting of
12% loss at the connection, 10% loss at public stand posts, 7% loss
in distribution mains and 1% loss in transmission mains. The
administrative loss (or apparent loss) caused by unauthorized
connections, water theft, etc is assumed at 10%.
Continuity of 8 hrs The average daily water supply period in KMC is 8 hours and is
water supplied intermittent, typically 4 hours in the morning and 4 hours in the late
afternoon. Supply hours are different for the various supply zones,
ranging from an average of 5 hours per day in the Garden Reach
supply zone to an average of 11 hours daily supply in the Palta
service area. Supply hours within each of the supply zones show
huge variations. Generally, the areas near the treatment plants and
main distribution reservoirs receive more hours of supply, even up to
20 hours a day, and the far end may receive only 4 hours supply per
day.
Residual 2.5m Currently the residual pressure varies widely. The average terminal
pressure pressure at the consumer end is around 2.5m of water head. In some
areas it ranges around 0.5m-1.0m of water head.
Complaint 95% KMC records 95% of complaints redressed within 24 hrs and 91%
handling even resolved within 3 hrs
Quality of water 98% The quality of treated surface water supplied fully complies (100%)
supplied with government standards. In some areas of KMC the groundwater
30
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Water 1900MLD Palta 1182 MLD installed capacity and 759 operational capacity;
production installed and Garden Reach 545 resp. 442 MLD; Jorabagan 36 resp. 36;
capacity 1374MLD Watgaunge 23 resp. 23; groundwater 114 resp.114 MLD. Total
operational installed capacity is 1182+545+36+23+114=1900 MLD and
capacity operational capacity is 759+442+36+23+114=1374 MLD
The power driven tube wells usually abstract water from the
aquifer 400-425 feet below ground level.
31
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
supply.
Reservoir 256ML Presently the reservoir capacity of KMC is 255.6 ML (150.6 ML for
capacity the Palta system+ 105 ML for Garden Reach).
Water supply 5840km Total length of the water pipe network is 5840km, consisting of
distribution 153km transmission pressure mains to reservoirs and pumping
pipes stations and 5687km distribution pipes under pressurized flow.
Many of the pipes in the central city distribution system are more
than 100 years old. Primary grids were laid as early as in the year
1860. The sizes of the mains in the secondary grid vary from
100mm to 200mm in diameter.
Water tanker 24 KMC operates 24 water tanker trucks with an average carrying
trucks capacity of 3600 liter. On an average these tankers make about
225 trips a day and supply about 8.1 mld of water per day to
various consumers. In addition tanker truck water supply is also
available for meeting bulk water requirements on special
occasions.
Extent of 0.1% Bulk water supply to commercial, institutional units and also to
metering domestic apartments is all metered. The current number of bulk
water connections is 245. None of the 246,332 domestic
connections in KMC is metered. This means that the total number
of metered connections is far less than 1% of connections.
Public stand 16,000 There are approx. 16,000 public stand posts mainly serving the
posts urban poor in the slums who cannot afford a connection. One
stand post would normally serve a cluster of around 20
households and on top of that stand post are often used by
hawkers, taxi drivers and other people who make a living on the
road. A considerable portion of the stand post supply is wasted
thus contributing to unaccounted for water. Pressure is also very
low at the stand posts, ranging from 1.0m to 2.5m.
32
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Remarks
1 Population in service area
Based on projected population growth KMC 2011-2022 (refer to previous chapters on population)
2 In year 2022 the entire KMC population should be served with piped water supply as compared to
92% in 2011.
3 Per capita water supply is currently 134 lpcd. The ambitious target for year 2022 set by KMC at
150 lpcd as for large metropolitan areas is feasible and realistic.
4 Reduction of unaccounted for water is essential for system sustainability. An overall reduction of
1% per year is a realistic target for KMC. This will bring the level of UFW down from currently 40%
to the national target of 20% by the year 2030. Reduction will mainly be achieved by an integrated
UFW reduction program targeting all causes of water losses with sub-targets as follows:
6 Residual pressure
33
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The residual pressure at consumer end is currently about 2.5m water head due to the fact that the
distribution pipes are old and incurs higher unit head loss. In order to increase the residual
pressure to 10m water head in 2022, old pipes (with lower C value) are to be replaced. KMC is
already on the job of identification and replacing of old pipes. In the last 5 years KMC has already
replaced about 350 km of distribution pipes.
Remarks
1 Number of water treatment plants
A new 136 MLD capacity water treatment plant is currently under construction in Dhapa (east
KMC) with support from JNNURM bringing the total to 5 water treatment plants before year
2017.
2 Installed water production capacity
Planned new capacity is 385MLD bringing the total installed production capacity at 2286MLD.
Addition of the new Dhapa plant will incresase the total installed by 136MLD. The ongoing
project for augmentation of the Garden Reach WTP will add 68MLD and the planned first
module of a new Garden Reach WTP will add another 181MLD.
However, the current groundwater supply with a capacity of 114MLD is included in this total and
it is assumed that groundwater usage will be phased out in the future because of groundwater
quality concerns. This brings the total installed capacity in year 2022 at 2172 MLD.
34
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
4 Tube wells
The power driven tube wells usually abstract water from the aquifer 400-425 feet below ground
level. All these power driven tube wells will be discarded in year 2022. First of all this is done
because of public health concerns related to arsenic contamination. A second and not less
important reason to abolish all groundwater abstraction is to prevent lowering or even depletion
of the aquifer and thereby reduce the level of ground subsidence. The latter is regarded as an
important measure to reduce the risks associated with climate change. Kolkata is located in the
Ganges River delta at an average elevation of only 5m above sea level. In some locations the
elevation is even lower. Ground subsidence caused by groundwater abstraction would increase
flooding risks of the city because of sea level rise.
As per CGWB Booklet, projected allocation for domestic and industrial uses under KMC area is
320.43 mld. In pre-monsoon and post monsoon, depth to ground water level in confined aquifer
in use varies from 12.09 to 19.59m below ground level (blg) and 10.72 to 15.42m bgl
respectively.
There is a declining trend of ground water level to the tune of 0.33m/yr at the core of the trough
and 0.11 m/yr at the periphery. The long term trend of ground water level indicates a falling trend
in both pre and post monsoon period. There is fall of 7 to 11m in ground water level in the last 45
years from 1958 to 2003. Since 2005 KMC gradually started replacing the ground water supply
by surface water supply. As a result there is a reduction in the quantum of ground water
withdrawal by KMC tube wells since 2005. Some positive impact on the ground water levels is
already found. In 2006 ground water withdrawal by Kolkata Municipal Corporation owned tube
wells came down to 144.30 mld. Presently in 2011, as per KMC officials, ground water
withdrawal has been reduced to 114 mld.
5 Reservoir capacity
Presently the zonal reservoir capacity of KMC is 255.6 ML (150.6 ML for Palta + 105 ML for
Garden Reach). Required zonal reservoir volume for future demand is 300 ML. Additional zonal
reservoir capacity of 45 ML is needed. Number, sizes and locations of new reservoirs will be
decided after analysis and rezoning of the distribution and secondary transmission system.
Sub-zonal reservoirs (overhead tanks or OHT) are proposed for balancing incoming water from
zonal reservoir and distribution requirement. Pumping from zonal reservoirs to sub-zonal
reservoir would be for 18 hours a day. One OHT per ward is proposed with an average capacity
of 1.2 ML each making a total of 170 ML for 141 wards. Average diameter would be 21m and
staging height 24 m. The shape may be circular or rectangular or other regular shape depending
of land availability. Sites have yet to be identified in detailed study for rezoning of the distribution
system. Approximate area requirement is 35mx35m for each OHT.
35
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
pressure mains to reservoirs and pumping stations and 5687km distribution pipes under
pressurized supply. The system covers 92% of KMC. For 100% coverage roughly 6000km of
distribution pipes would be needed in total in year 2022.
9 Extent of metering
Bulk water is supplied to commercial and institutional units and also to domestic apartments.
Connections provided for the purpose is termed as ‘Bulk water connection’. The current number
of metered bulk water connections is 245. Apart from these, there are 8,865 unmetered
commercial ferrule connections. It is assumed that by 2022 the number of bulk connections with
32mm connection size will be 2450 and the number of commercial connection with 25mm
connection size will be 10,600. All bulk and commercial connection are proposed to be metered.
Individual house connections are to be metered after 2022.
36
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Treatment capacity 88% Total waste water generation in year 2011 is 90% of water
available as percentage of supplied to KMC area, which is 90%x1186=1067MLD.
normative waste water Total treatment capacity available is 1120MLD: 154 MLD
generation if/when there is in the three STPs and 966 MLD is collected and treated by
sewerage system natural treatment in the East Kolkata Wetlands. Total
treatment capacity as percentage of waste water
generated is thus more than 100%. However, the
treatment capacity is unevenly distributed over the KMC
area. Treatment capacity is not available to outer areas
not yet served by a formal sewer system, especially those
areas where natural flow of discharge is not to the EKW
but to Hooghly River. These un-served outer areas
generate approximately 12% of waste water, meaning that
in reality treatment capacity is available for 88% of waste
water generation.
37
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Percentage of samples that 100% Based on available EKW Water Analysis and STP effluent
pass the specified analysis reports.
secondary treatment
standards if/when there is
sewerage system
Percentage of waste water 93% The EKW sewerage discharge (966MLD) is completely
received at treatment plant reused in the fisheries. Effluent from the other 3 STPs
that that is recycled or (154MLD) is partly (appr. 50% = 77MLD) reused for
reused if/when there is agricultural purposes during the dry season. Total
sewerage system percentage reused is 93% =(966 + 77) / (966+154).
Total number of complaints 65% As per KMC information daily 7-10 complaints are
redressed within 24 hours received and about 5-6 complaints will be redressed
of receipt of complaint as a (approximately 65%). Since 2010 KMC has an e-complaint
percentage of total number handling system as part of the e-governance drive.
of complaints if/when Records and handling times are already improving as a
redressal system is result.
already instituted
Underground sewer 1778 km According to the S&D Master Plan (2007) the total
network (km) underground sewer length is 1,400 km. The KEIP Phase 1
has constructed 378 km new underground sewers. The total
length of the underground sewer network in 2011 stands at
1,778km (=1,400 + 378).
No. of house holds 452,764 hh Total number of households connected to septic tanks is
connected to septic (47%) 452,764 of which final discharge is to surface drain =190,506
tank hh; final discharge to sewer = 262,258 hh.
No. of house holds 691,020 hh Total number of households in KMC in year 2011 is 972,264.
connected to ( 71%) The number of households with direct connection to the
underground underground sewerage network is 428,762 (44%). The
sewers number of households with in-direct connection to the
underground sewerage network via interceptor sewers
262,258 (27%). Total number of households connected to
the sewer system is 691,020 (71%)
.
38
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Population covered 3,984,485 Population covered under drainage includes all population in the
under drainage (= 89%) core city area (=2,490,245 people) and in the KEIP Phase 1
areas (=1,494,240). Total population covered under drainage is
3,984,485 (=2,490,245+1,494,240) which is 89% of the total 2011
KMC population. Total 2011 KMC population is 4,484,484.
Population not yet covered in KMC is 500,000 people
(=4,484,484-3,984,485).
Areas covered 80% Total KMC area is 187km2. Area covered under drainage before
under drainage KEIP Phase 1 was 85km2. KEIP Phase 1 covers 65km2
previously unsewered outer areas. Total area covered in 2011 is
thus 85+65=150km2, which is 80% (=150/187) of the total KMC
surface area. Remaining unsewered outer areas not yet covered
is 37 km2 in total.
Number of times > 6 times Master Plan design rainfall intensity is taken at two months storm
water logging is per year. frequency rainfall. Actual capacity is only 50% in the central city
reported in year at area due to siltation and limited pumping capacity. Hence the
flood prone points actual number of water logging incidents is more than the design
within city. capacity of 6 times per year in flood prone locations.
39
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Drainage 3,006km According to the S&D Master Plan (2007) the total underground
Networks (km) sewer length is 1,400 km. The KEIP Phase 1 has constructed 378
km new underground sewers. The total length of the underground
sewer network in 2011 stands at 1,778km (=1,400 + 378).
In addition existing surface drains in KMC have a total length is 950
Km. The KEIP Phase 1 Slum Improvement Program includes
construction of 28 km surface drains of which 20 is widening and 8
km is new drains. This brings the total length of the surface drainage
network after completion of KEIP Phase 1 at 958km.
The 2011 combined length of the underground and surface drainage
network thus stands at 2,736km (=1,778+958).
In addition the total length of open drainage channels serving the
KMC area is 270km meaning that the drainage network has a total
length of 2,736+270= 3,006km.
Area of 80% Total KMC area is 187km2. Area covered under drainage before
coverage KEIP Phase 1 was 85km2. KEIP Phase 1 covers 65km2 previously
unsewered outer areas. Total area covered in 2011 is thus
85+65=150km2, which is 80% (=150/187) of the total KMC surface
area. Remaining unsewered outer areas not yet covered is 37 km2
in total.
Population in 3,984,485 Population covered under drainage includes all population in the
the area of (= 89%) core city area (=2,490,245 people) and in the KEIP Phase 1 areas
coverage (=1,494,240). Total population covered under drainage is 3,984,485
(=2,490,245+1,494,240) which is 89% of the total 2011 KMC
population. Total 2011 KMC population is 4,484,484. Population not
yet covered in KMC is 500,000 people (=4,484,484-3,984,485).
Commercial N.A. Commercial losses through energy audit discussed with KMC, SO
losses (Drainage). Not Applicable
40
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Remarks
1 Population with direct sewer connection
In base year 2011 a total number of 428,762 households have a direct connection to the sewer
network. The average household size in 2011 is 4.61, meaning that the total population with direct
connection to the underground sewer network in KMC in 2011 is 1,976,593 people
(=428,762x4.61).
The KEIP Phase 1 has created 70,000 new sewer house connections in the outer areas. For the
period up to 2022 it is assumed that connecting a similar number of houses to the sewer network
is a realistic assumption. Therefore the 2022 target is to have 500,000 households directly
connected to the sewer network, meaning a total of 71,238 new sewer connections. Household
size is expected to decrease from 4.61 in 2011 to 4.20 in 2022. As a result the number of people
directly connected to the sewer network in year 2022 is 4,20 x 500,000 = 2,100,000
41
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Remarks
1 Volume sewerage treatment plants
An additional capacity of 131.5 MLD is required to treat sewage from currently un-served areas.
This is to be achieved by construction of 4 additional sewerage treatment plants at 92 MLD
capacity (resp. 22MLD+40MLD+10MLD+20MLD) plus augmentation of the existing SSE plant
from currently 45 MLD to 72 MLD (additional 32 MLD) plus rehabilitation of an existing dis-
functional STP at 7.5MLD. Total additional capacity is 92+32+7.5=131.5MLD.
42
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
For the currently unsewered KMC area of 37km2 construction of a total network is required of
650km sewers, consisting of 168 km trunk (600mm and above) and 482km secondary sewers
(below 600mm).
Remarks
1 Road length covered by drainage
In 2011 the total length of the underground and surface drainage network is 2,736km.
For the currently unsewered KMC area of 37km2 construction of a total network is required of
650km sewers, consisting of 168 km trunk (600mm and above) and 482km secondary sewers
(below 600mm).
Hence, in 2022 the total length of sewers and surface drains will become 2736 + 650 = 3386km.
43
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
The total road length in 2011 is 4200km. It is assumed that because of ongoing land
development, especially in the outer wards, and increasing motorized traffic volumes the total
road length will be extended over the years and will increase by approximately 10% in ten years
time to a total length of 4620km in year 2022.
Remarks
1 Capacity of drainage
In 2022 the target is to serve the entire KMC area with a formal drainage system designed and
maintained for a 2 months rainstorm frequency. Most important interventions to achieve the
targeted service level is the extension of the drainage network to un-served outer wards (37km2),
the desiltation and rehabilitation of the core city drainage network, refurbishment of core city
pumping stations and most of all proper and adequate routine maintenance.
Rehabilitation of the core city network to its design capacity would add 50% (+436m3/s) to the
current operational capacity. For the un-served outer wards (37km2) additional drainage capacity
of 379m3/s is required. Total additional capacity in 2022 as compared to the baseline situation in
44
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
3 Area of coverage
Additional coverage of currently unsewered areas is 37km2
5 No of pumping stations
To achieve the target service levels pumping capacity should be increased. This would be done
by augmentation of 13 existing pumping stations, construction of 13 new main pumping stations
and construction of 4 small pumping stations.
45
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Total waste collected vs. total 97% KMC estimates that of total waste generated (4430
waste generated tons/day) only approximately 3% (130 tons / day) is not
collected but (illegally) disposed in channels, vacant land
and used for infill.
Percent of households and 4% In 2011 source segregation has been introduced as a pilot
establishments that segregate project in 7 wards (33, 47, 64, 103, 110, 115 and 130)
their waste covering only 4.4% of the KMC population.
Extent of recovery (waste 20% Informal segregation takes place at all stages of waste
processing & recycling processing. Newspapers, paper board, packaging boxes,
facilities) of waste collected glass bottles and plastic bottles and containers are
traditionally kept separately in households/business and
commercials establishments and are sold periodically to
vendors for such recyclable material. There is no estimate
about the quantity of such recycled material. Doorstep
collectors of household waste and street sweepers
routinely segregate recyclable material especially plastic,
paper and boards etc and remove them before they are
disposed in secondary collection points (vats) in the city.
Large vats are regularly rummaged by rag pickers to
segregate recyclable waste. Upon arrival at the Dhapa
dumping ground about 4% of waste, representing the
remaining recyclable fraction is recovered by rag pickers.
As a result it is estimated that 13% of waste is removed
before it is finally disposed. Biodegradable waste from
major markets at a total of 300 tons per day representing
7% of total waste is collected separately and transported
to Dhapa compost plant. This means that currently 20% of
total waste collected is recovered (13% recycling and 7%
composting).
Amount of waste that is 0% Baseline 2011 is that the existing dumping sites are not
disposed in landfills that have operated as sanitary landfills in accordance with national
been designed, built, standards.
operated as per standards Dhapa dumping ground has been authorized by WBPCB
46
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
47
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Composting Plant 500 The composting plant at the Dhapa dump site is operated
T/Day capacity by a private company. Current production is only
300T/day below the operational capacity of 500T/day.
Lack of supply of biodegradable wastes of sufficient
quality currently reduces the operational capacity.
Garden Reach dump site. The Garden Reach landfill is a small site with very limited
Current average disposal is capacity and is nearing its limit as well. Operation at
10 T/day. Garden Reach is not in accordance with national
standards for sanitary landfill.
Remarks
1 Population covered by daily doorstep collection
Total population in 2011 is 4,484,484 of which 75% is covered by the doorstep collection system
(3,363,400 people). Coverage is projected to grow to a total of 100%, meaning 4,560,887 people
in year 2022.
48
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
49
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
50
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Remarks
Intermediate targets for year 2017
In general KMC intends to replace collection equipment as and when required based on
availability of funds, depreciation of existing equipment and possible opportunities for
contracting out of part of the collection and transportation operations. Apart from depreciation
this depends on actual operation and maintenance costs of depreciated equipment and
availability of spare parts. As an overall target for year 2017 it is assumed that 50% of the
existing (2011) collection equipment will be scrapped by 2017 and 50% of the 2022 target
equipment will be procured and operational in year 2017.
For the disposal sites the 2017 target is to have the new 17.7ha Dhapa site fully operational as a
sanitary landfill and to have the existing Dhapa site as well as the existing Garden Reach dump
site properly closed. The privately operated composting plant should operate at its design
capacity of 500 tonnes per day in year 2017.
1 Collection equipment
Presently mixed waste (bio-degradable, part recyclable and inert) is collected by open handcart
from residential, institutional/commercial and market area and brought to secondary collection
points. KMC envisages procurement and deployment of modernized collection equipment
mainly replacing open collection carts and tricycles by containerized closed vehicles. Besides,
KMC intends to gradually extend the use of private contractors for waste collection.
2 Transportation equipment/vehicles
KMC envisages procurement and deployment of modernized equipment and various types of
compactors at secondary collection points to reduce the volume of collected waste, reduce
space requirement for vat and consequently to reduce the number of trips by transportation
vehicles.
Currently 70% of solid waste transportation from secondary collection sites to the final disposal
site is contracted out to private contractors. KMC transports the remaining 30% of waste to the
final disposal site. In the planning period up to 2022 KMC intends to gradually increase the
share of the private sector in the transportation of waste and thus minimizing the need to
procure new transportation vehicles for replacement of the current vehicle fleet.
4 Disposal sites
4A Dhapa
Dhapa landfill is a very large site but it is nearing its capacity and development of a new site is
urgently required. Total remaining capacity is approximately just enough for one more year at an
average disposal of 4286 ton per day in 2011. KMC intends to close both the previous and the
existing site. For closure of the previous Dhapa site the IBRD has committed financial
assistance. Closure of the existing landfill and development of a new sanitary landfill, including
procurement of equipment, at Dhapa would provide sufficient capacity for approximately ten
years. It would cover an area of 17.75 ha as approved by WBPCB and EKWMA, with an
average height of 15 m (Ref: KMC Document titled DPR on Integrated Waste Management
Facilities at Dhapa for Kolkata City). For the long term KMC wants to develop a 210ha plot of
land at Beonta Mouza that would provide sufficient dumping capacity for a period of 30 years.
51
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
4B Composting plant
The existing privately operated composting pant at Dhapa handles 300 tonnes per day but has a
capacity of 500 tonnes per day. Constraint is currently the lack of good quality biodegradable
material supply. As more segregation at the source will take place, the quantity of segregated
biodegradable waste delivered at the composting site in Dhapa will increase.
Enhancement of present capacity of the existing compost plant to 1000 TPD within the present
factory premises is feasible and has been envisaged by the private operator.
52
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
53
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
54
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
55
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
56
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
57
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Annex B. Population densities in people per km2 by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV)
W/B 2001 2011 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042
1 35689 38300 39957 41393 42880 44421 46018 47671
2 27490 27717 27854 27969 28085 28201 28317 28434
3 39569 39151 38902 38697 38492 38288 38085 37883
4 42271 35604 32120 29478 27054 24829 22787 20913
5 19242 16976 15747 14791 13893 13049 12257 11513
6 27591 23926 21964 20453 19046 17736 16515 15380
7 48019 45089 43418 42072 40769 39506 38283 37096
8 58410 53772 51169 49096 47105 45198 43366 41608
9 68664 55332 48608 43637 39172 35165 31565 28337
I 34027 32016 30987 30220 29530 28913 28363 27876
10 77099 63292 56225 50943 46156 41821 37891 34331
11 80238 67959 61513 56611 52098 47947 44126 40609
12 54977 40951 34319 29618 25562 22061 19042 16433
15 50161 45244 42528 40391 38359 36432 34599 32860
16 86316 70037 61782 55651 50132 45157 40677 36640
17 66187 55150 49431 45121 41188 37597 34320 31327
18 107549 95499 88926 83799 78963 74409 70117 66069
19 100751 87165 79909 74328 69134 64302 59811 55634
20 69299 72849 75065 76963 78909 80905 82952 85050
II 72390 61934 56605 52632 49038 45789 42851 40192
13 39602 42010 43524 44828 46170 47554 48978 50445
14 49472 53129 55452 57465 59552 61713 63953 66276
29 83216 95091 103016 110120 117716 125834 134515 143792
30 49567 52213 53868 55288 56744 58241 59775 61351
31 26329 28239 29451 30501 31588 32714 33879 35087
32 27684 27002 26600 26271 25946 25624 25306 24993
33 24207 25160 25750 26252 26764 27286 27818 28361
34 35268 37998 39737 41246 42814 44440 46129 47881
35 37696 42463 45606 48405 51373 54525 57869 61418
III 36293 38748 40341 41742 43214 44760 46384 48092
21 72264 69756 68291 67097 65921 64768 63632 62520
22 59546 48267 42553 38312 34493 31054 27959 25174
23 132476 110495 99100 90504 82655 75489 68942 62962
24 96940 98405 99294 100044 100794 101554 102319 103089
25 96311 70138 57986 49484 42229 36036 30753 26242
26 89058 73785 65909 59992 54606 49702 45241 41179
27 54360 45251 40535 36985 33743 30786 28090 25627
28 98241 94761 92731 91073 89446 87847 86278 84736
38 57121 59680 61271 62627 64015 65432 66883 68363
39 140272 105704 89202 77431 67219 58353 50653 43970
IV 82957 72478 67322 63568 60243 57298 54689 52377
36 24564 26508 27747 28823 29942 31104 32312 33565
37 76494 76471 76459 76446 76436 76424 76414 76401
58
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Annex B. Population densities in people per km2 by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV)
W/B 2001 2011 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042
40 66309 55867 50409 46270 42471 38982 35782 32845
41 121493 94159 80806 71138 62625 55131 48538 42727
42 81094 67620 60635 55367 50559 46168 42160 38496
43 125438 74669 54699 42200 32562 25120 19382 14952
44 64471 55537 50782 47133 43745 40602 37684 34977
45 9973 5467 3811 2822 2089 1547 1145 848
48 89972 83921 80488 77734 75074 72505 70023 67627
49 80043 74165 70846 68198 65646 63187 60825 58548
50 47894 45534 44176 43072 41998 40950 39927 38931
V 49256 41821 38466 36137 34150 32445 30974 29700
46 17558 9325 6379 4649 3389 2469 1799 1312
47 52612 36232 28967 24037 19948 16554 13737 11401
51 54467 45372 40663 37111 33871 30916 28218 25754
52 103370 72902 59122 49649 41697 35014 29408 24695
53 83855 73300 67615 63217 59104 55258 51665 48303
54 106986 96192 90245 85572 81139 76936 72954 69174
55 36735 33591 31836 30443 29111 27838 26620 25455
60 73175 61607 55564 50983 46780 42924 39386 36138
61 53109 47996 45167 42938 40819 38803 36888 35067
62 120226 88795 74033 63624 54679 46992 40385 34707
VI 56399 45546 40429 36770 33563 30735 28229 25994
56 63892 64596 65023 65380 65738 66100 66463 66827
57 16523 18173 19241 20179 21162 22194 23276 24410
58 8001 8189 8304 8401 8500 8599 8700 8802
59 34317 36039 37113 38033 38976 39942 40933 41947
63 8455 6469 5509 4819 4215 3687 3225 2821
64 31582 36532 39867 42877 46116 49598 53344 57373
65 60114 54313 51105 48576 46172 43888 41716 39652
66 36776 51454 62940 74447 88059 104159 123202 145728
67 29629 30654 31286 31824 32370 32925 33490 34064
VII 19516 20644 21592 22564 23725 25103 26730 28646
68 26053 22366 20409 18910 17521 16234 15042 13936
69 21497 20820 20425 20100 19782 19468 19159 18855
70 38170 22333 16191 12385 9473 7246 5543 4241
71 31934 28151 26101 24506 23009 21604 20284 19045
72 42400 33254 28743 25455 22543 19964 17680 15658
73 45055 43245 42193 41337 40499 39676 38871 38082
84 50326 41407 36832 33411 30305 27490 24935 22619
85 43720 41332 39961 38855 37779 36733 35715 34726
86 28322 21437 18139 15780 13730 11945 10392 9041
87 17829 16888 16347 15910 15486 15071 14668 14276
90 19330 16386 14841 13664 12581 11583 10665 9820
VIII 29976 25509 23362 21808 20430 19200 18096 17101
74 11088 11487 11733 11942 12155 12371 12591 12816
75 43331 39764 37766 36179 34657 33200 31804 30468
59
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Annex B. Population densities in people per km2 by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV)
W/B 2001 2011 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042
76 55700 50906 48229 46107 44079 42140 40284 38513
77 89052 92780 95091 97062 99072 101125 103220 105358
78 86408 79061 74955 71699 68581 65602 62750 60023
79 14408 14883 15176 15424 15676 15933 16193 16458
80 4253 3378 2942 2622 2337 2083 1856 1654
82 46807 42037 39412 37350 35396 33544 31789 30126
83 50679 46019 43431 41385 39438 37579 35811 34125
88 55279 48219 44424 41489 38749 36190 33799 31567
IX 18759 17596 16991 16535 16118 15738 15393 15081
81 37107 32414 29888 27935 26108 24401 22806 21315
89 38337 31841 28484 25959 23657 21560 19649 17907
91 33779 35581 36708 37676 38667 39685 40731 41803
92 22805 23154 23365 23544 23723 23903 24086 24269
93 29995 23547 20365 18043 15987 14165 12551 11120
94 17693 16468 15774 15219 14682 14165 13666 13184
95 28268 26491 25480 24666 23879 23116 22378 21663
96 25727 27627 28834 29880 30963 32087 33250 34456
97 19341 19252 19199 19154 19110 19065 19021 18977
98 26276 27321 27968 28519 29082 29654 30238 30834
99 21812 29461 35283 41005 47656 55383 64365 74803
100 21103 18175 16616 15420 14310 13280 12324 11437
X 25900 24763 24316 24077 23960 23969 24109 24386
101 22450 23938 24877 25689 26526 27391 28284 29206
102 20953 22082 22788 23393 24015 24653 25309 25981
110 13002 15506 17235 18822 20555 22447 24514 26771
111 13253 15936 17800 19519 21404 23471 25738 28223
112 15848 20171 23312 26300 29671 33473 37764 42605
113 18727 20440 21541 22505 23511 24563 25662 26810
114 13613 18184 21633 25003 28897 33398 38599 44611
XI 16204 19012 20999 22859 24930 27239 29817 32698
103 26750 26459 26286 26143 25999 25857 25716 25576
104 24784 27766 29724 31462 33300 35247 37306 39487
105 31434 33442 34708 35798 36924 38085 39282 40518
106 15958 21234 25202 29071 33534 38681 44618 51467
107 14715 20124 24282 28397 33209 38836 45416 53112
108 5979 10102 13838 17987 23380 30390 39501 51344
109 5301 9102 12590 16498 21620 28330 37124 48647
XII 10615 14566 17936 21543 26093 31853 39165 48475
115 20788 21503 21944 22318 22699 23086 23479 23880
116 23301 23177 23104 23042 22981 22920 22859 22798
117 34553 30245 27923 26125 24442 22867 21395 20017
118 30565 25625 23053 21108 19326 17695 16202 14836
119 30875 26170 23698 21818 20087 18493 17025 15674
120 31519 28527 26871 25562 24319 23136 22010 20939
121 20305 20273 20254 20238 20222 20206 20190 20174
60
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
Annex B. Population densities in people per km2 by Ward (1-141) and Borough (I-XV)
W/B 2001 2011 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042
122 11076 12386 13245 14006 14811 15662 16562 17514
123 16133 18621 20295 21803 23424 25166 27036 29046
XIII 20379 20159 20144 20199 20312 20486 20718 21010
124 13468 15262 16451 17513 18643 19846 21127 22490
125 14661 15711 16377 16954 17550 18168 18807 19469
126 9203 10659 11640 12527 13482 14509 15614 16804
127 10760 12855 14304 15635 17090 18681 20419 22320
128 17342 16838 16542 16300 16062 15827 15595 15367
129 18448 18774 18972 19139 19307 19477 19648 19821
130 25669 22282 20468 19070 17767 16553 15423 14369
131 21344 21845 22152 22411 22673 22937 23205 23476
132 30641 28982 28030 27260 26512 25785 25077 24388
XIV 15497 16254 16795 17300 17855 18466 19135 19866
133 46978 50336 52464 54307 56215 58188 60232 62349
134 96040 93299 91692 90375 89077 87797 86535 85289
135 95168 99803 102693 105163 107694 110284 112937 115656
136 41189 40512 40112 39782 39453 39128 38805 38486
137 32068 31002 30379 29870 29369 28878 28393 27917
138 42972 35698 31938 29111 26533 24183 22041 20089
139 27869 26005 24947 24098 23278 22486 21722 20983
140 19159 19731 20082 20379 20681 20987 21298 21613
141 11956 15786 18650 21430 24625 28295 32513 37359
XV 30672 31026 31483 32022 32716 33584 34642 35915
Total 25272 24783 24883 25206 25767 26598 27740 29251
61
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
62
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
63
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
64
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
65
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
66
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
67
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
68
Volume 1 The Urban Service Plan
69