04 Handout 1
04 Handout 1
04 Handout 1
Defining Culture
A culturally diverse workforce has long been an important reliance on the tourism and hospitality industry. As
defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, culture pertains to the customary beliefs, social forms, and
material traits of a racial, religious, or social group. It also refers to a set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and
practices that characterizes an institution or organization.
Culture is the social glue that helps hold the organization together by providing standards for what employees
should say and do. It is a sense-making, control mechanism that guides and shapes employees’ attitudes and
behavior.
Culture is constantly created and changed as groups of people socially interact with one another, allowing
cohesion between people from distinct organizations or departments, work as a connection factor. Inter-
organizational relationships, and organizational cultures, rely on trust, commitment, communication, learning,
ways to perceive and cope with reality, and shared meanings and symbols (De Anca & Vasquez, 2007).
Organizational culture represents a perception that the organization’s members hold in common. The
dominant culture expresses the core values (the primary or dominant values accepted throughout the
organization) that gives the organization its distinct personality. For instance, Zappos’ (an online shoe and
clothing retailer based in Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) culture values customer care and dedication over
speed and efficiency, which explains Zappos executives and employees’ behaviors (Robbins & Judge, 2018).
In addition to each organization’s dominant culture, subcultures (mini cultures within an organization,
typically defined by department designations and geographical separation) tend to develop in large
organizations in response to common problems or experiences a group of members faces in the same
department or location. Most large organizations have a dominant culture and numerous subcultures. It is the
shared meaning aspect of culture that makes it a potent device for guiding and shaping organizational
behavior.
Service Culture
It is possible to differentiate between strong and weak cultures. If most employees (responding to surveys, for
instance) have the same opinions about the organization’s mission and values, the culture is strong; if opinions
vary widely, it is weak.
In a strong culture, the organization’s core values are both intensely held and widely shared. The more
members who accept the core values and the greater their commitment, the stronger the culture and the
greater its influence on member behavior. A weak culture exemplifies otherwise. The culture that should be
existing in the tourism and hospitality industry is known as service culture. This culture anticipates guests’
needs and renders services accordingly before they ask for it. Guest satisfaction must be the topmost priority
for any tourism and hospitality professional.
Functions of Culture
Culture defines the rules of the game in an organization.
It has a boundary-defining role: it creates distinctions between organizations.
It conveys a sense of identity for organization members.
It facilitates commitment to something larger than self-interest.
It enhances the stability of the social system.
A strong culture supported by formal rules and regulations ensures employees will act in a relatively uniform
and predictable way. Today’s trend towards dispersed organizations makes culture more important than ever,
and ironically more difficult at the same time. When formal authority and control systems are reduced, the
culture’s shared meaning can point everyone in the same direction.
In virtual organizations (institutions that work remotely), the lack of frequent face-to-face contact makes
establishing a common set of norms very difficult. Strong leadership that fosters a strong culture by frequently
communicating about common goals and priorities is necessary to make organizations more adaptive and
innovative in the tourism and hospitality industry.
Organizational Climate
Organizational climate refers to the shared perceptions that organizational members have about their
organization and work environment. This aspect of culture is like team spirit at the organizational level. When
everyone has the same general feelings about what’s important or how well things are working, the effect of
these attitudes will be more than the sum of the individual parts. A positive organizational climate has been
linked to higher customer satisfaction and organizational financial performance, as well.
Dimensions of organizational climate have been studied, including innovation, creativity, communication,
warmth and support, involvement, safety, justice, diversity, and customer service. There are several findings
managers can use to improve their organizational design and team-building plans (Robbins & Judge, 2018).
For instance, a new airline or hotel employee who comes across a diverse organizational climate will feel more
comfortable collaborating with coworkers regardless of their demographic backgrounds. The organizational
climate also influences the habits people adopt. If there is a safety climate, everyone wears safety gear and
follows safety procedures even if individually, they would not normally think very often about being safe.
Studies have shown that a safety climate decreases the number of documented injuries on the job, like those
in kitchens or aircraft.
Cultural Categories and Dimensions
In a study by Fons Trompenaars (a Dutch organizational theorist, management consultant, and author in the
field of cross-cultural communication), he conceived culture as to how organizations resolved a range of
universal problems that could be divided into three (3) categories: a) those that arise from relationships with
other people, b) those that arise from the passing of time, and c) those related to the environment.
Problems Arising from Relationships with Other People
• The concept of self: individualism versus collectivism
One of the basic cultural differences in society is the extent of individualism compared to collectivism.
o In an individualistic culture, the individual puts their needs before those of the group. For an
individualistic person, the best form of guaranteeing the group’s welfare is to make its members
self-sufficient. The general values appreciated by the group are those related to self-sufficiency
and self-confidence. In general, the individuals tend to have a distant behavior at the emotional
and psychological level.
o In a collectivist culture, a person’s identity depends on the individual’s role in the group, whether
the group is represented by the family, the team, work, and the like. The success and survival of
the group guarantee the welfare of its members. The individual normally puts the group’s needs
and feelings before their own, believing this to be the best way to ensure their survival.
Interdependence and harmony among members of the group are the most appreciated values.
The group members are psychologically and emotionally close, but distant to those who do not
belong.
• The concept of obligations: universalism versus particularism
When obligations to family and friends interfere with social obligations, individuals belonging to different
cultures normally position themselves at one or the other end of the spectrum ranging from particularism
to universalism.
According to this dimension, the values associated with a long-term orientation are saving and
perseverance. In contrast, the values associated with short-term orientation are respect for tradition,
meeting social obligations, and the protection of personal “image.”
The power distance and aversion to uncertainty dimensions are undoubtedly the two (2) that have the most
influence over organizations’ management styles. Both help to answer two (2) fundamental questions:
Who should have the power to decide?
What rules and procedures should be followed to reach the desired outcome?
The cultural dimensions identified by Hofstede served as a foundation for the development of numerous
studies in different areas of management (motivation, leadership, relationships between superiors and
subordinates, the sources of an existing power in an organization), and the structure and the culture of the
organization.
The categories and dimensions discussed are not rigid and change according to the circumstances and internal
and external pressures. As a result, in the same country or even in the same organization, different
characteristics may be present simultaneously due to the diversity of elements that coexist in our companies
today.
The perspective of cultural complexity suggests organizations’ culture is more complex, diverse, and
intrinsically contradictory. It is now highly unusual for all the members of an organization to belong to the
same culture, or subculture, as a person can identify themselves by gender, ethnic origin, their role as a parent
or spouse, their sports club, their profession, department or division, their trade union, their geographic
region, their industrial sector, and their country or region. All these possible cultural identities can
simultaneously influence the cultural context of an organization.
Diversity is the vehicle through which nature adapts, competes, and evolves. The existence of diverse elements
in a group, particularly in the tourism and hospitality industry, can be its salvation when environmental
conditions change. Traditional ways of seeing things no longer guarantee survival.
Being a woman does not automatically mean that someone is sensitive, in the same way that being Italian
does not necessarily mean that someone is polychronic. However, the characteristics of sensitivity and being
polychronic are real, and tourism and hospitality managers must know the advantages and disadvantages of
an employee who is sensitive or polychronic, and knows how to utilize them to the benefit of the organization,
independently of the label we put on these feminine or cultural traits.
In a labor market context, differences in gender, culture, and personality are even more marked. In a changing
economic environment, it is not easy to decide which style of behavior is the most appropriate for the
company: a multifaceted person capable of generating work rapidly in many directions, or a monochronic
planner focused on details and capable of producing rigorous work.
Ideally, each person should be capable of both approaches, and training helps each acquire the other’s skills.
Nevertheless, while people are being trained to be more complete beings, they must learn to respect and
complement differences.
References:
Braedel-Kühner, C. & Müller, A.P. (2016). Re-thinking diversity: Multiple approaches in theory, media, communities, and managerial
practice. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
De Anca, C. & Vasquez, A. (2007). Managing diversity in the global organization: Creating new business values. Palgrave Macmillan.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2020). Culture. Retrieved 05 May 2020, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture.
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.