Probability Sampling - According To BJYU's, It Utilizes Some Form of Random Selection. in This
Probability Sampling - According To BJYU's, It Utilizes Some Form of Random Selection. in This
Probability Sampling - According To BJYU's, It Utilizes Some Form of Random Selection. in This
In Statistics, there are different sampling techniques available to get relevant results from
the population. The two different types of sampling methods are:
Probability Sampling
Non-probability Sampling
Probability Sampling – According to BJYU’s, it utilizes some form of random selection. In this
method, all the eligible individuals have a chance of selecting the sample from the whole sample
space. This method is more time consuming and expensive than the non-probability sampling
method. The benefit of using probability sampling is that it guarantees the sample that should be
the representative of the population.
Uses of Probability Sampling:
Reduce Sample Bias: Using the probability sampling method, the bias in the sample
derived from a population is negligible to non-existent. The selection of the sample
mainly depicts the understanding and the inference of the researcher. Probability
sampling leads to higher quality data collection as the sample appropriately represents the
population.
Diverse Population: When the population is vast and diverse, it is essential to have
adequate representation so that the data is not skewed towards one demographic. For
example, if Square would like to understand the people that could make their point-of-
sale devices, a survey conducted from a sample of people across the US from different
industries and socio-economic backgrounds helps.
Create an Accurate Sample: Probability sampling helps the researchers plan and create
an accurate sample. This helps to obtain well-defined data.
There are several types of probability sampling. Below are the explanations of advantage
and dis-advantages of each type.
While simple random sampling creates samples that are highly representative of the
population, it can be time consuming and tedious when creating large samples. In practice,
a random sample is selected unit by unit. Below are the two methods of random selection for
Simple Random Sampling:
Lottery Method - Using the lottery method is one of the oldest ways and is a
mechanical example of random sampling. In this method, the researcher gives
each member of the population a number. Researchers draw numbers from
the box randomly to choose samples.
Selection based on random number tables - The use of random numbers is an
alternative method that also involves numbering the population. The use of a
number table like the one below can help with this sampling technique
1. Make a list of all the employees working in the organization. (as mentioned above
there are 500 employees in the organization, the record must contain 500 names).
2. Assign a sequential number to each employee (1,2,3…n). This is your sampling
frame (the list from which you draw your simple random sample).
3. Figure out what your sample size is going to be. (In this case, the sample size is
100).
4. Use a random number generator to select the sample, using your sampling frame
(population size) from Step 2 and your sample size from Step 3. For example, if your
sample size is 100 and your population is 500, generate 100 random numbers
between 1 and 500.
Systematic Random Sampling – This type of sampling method has a predefined range,
and hence this sampling technique is the least time-consuming. It is often compared to an
arithmetic progression in which the difference between any two consecutive numbers is
of the same value. It employs a simple rule of selecting every kth unit starting with a
number chosen at random from 1 to k as the random start. A common sampling unit in
forest surveys is a narrow strip at right angles to a base line and running completely
across the forest. If the sampling units are strips, then the scheme is known as systematic
sampling by strips. Another possibility is known as systematic line plot sampling where
plots of a fixed size and shape are taken at equal intervals along equally spaced parallel
lines. In the latter case, the sample could as well be systematic in two directions.
What are the steps to form a sample using the systematic sampling technique?
Step one: Develop a defined structural audience to start working on the sampling aspect.
Step two: As a researcher, figure out the ideal size of the sample, i.e., how many people
from the entire population to choose to be a part of the sample.
Step three: Once you decide the sample size, assign a number to every member of the
sample.
Step four: Define the interval of this sample. This will be the standard distance between
the elements.
Step five: Select the members who fit the criteria which in this case will be 1 in 10
individuals.
Step six: Randomly choose the starting member (r) of the sample and add the interval to
the random number to keep adding members in the sample. r, r+i, r+2i, etc. will
be the elements of the sample.
When you are sampling, ensure you represent the population fairly. Systematic
sampling is a symmetrical process where the researcher chooses the samples after a
specifically defined interval. Sampling like this leaves the researcher no room for bias
regarding choosing the sample. To understand how systematic sampling exactly works,
take the example of the gym class where the instructor asks the students to line up and
asks every third person to step out of the line. Here, the instructor has no influence over
choosing the samples and can accurately represent the class.
(a) Calculate sampling interval (k) = N/n. (If N = 11 and n = 2, then k is taken as
5 and not 6)
(b) Start randomly between 1 to N
(c) Create samples by skipping through k units every time until you select
members of the entire population.
(d) In the case of this method, there will be N number of samples, unlike k
samples in the linear systematic sampling method.
It’s extremely simple and convenient for the researchers to create, conduct, analyze
samples.
As there’s no need to number each member of a sample, it is better for representing
a population in a faster and simpler manner.
The samples created are based on precision in member selection and free from
favoritism.
In the other methods of probability sampling methods such as cluster
sampling and stratified sampling or non-probability methods such as convenience
sampling, there are chances of the clusters created to be highly biased which is
avoided in systematic sampling as the members are at a fixed distance from one
another.
The factor of risk involved in this sampling method is extremely minimal.
In case there are diverse members of a population, this sampling technique can be
beneficial because of the even distribution of members to form a sample.
In stratified random sampling, the subjects are initially grouped into different
classifications such as gender, level of education, or socioeconomic status. It’s important
to note that these classifications should not have any overlapping subjects. From here,
researchers randomly select the final list of subjects from the different defined categories
to ensure a well-rounded sample. This method of probability sampling is best used when
the goal of the research is to study a particular subgroup within a greater population. It
also results in more precise statistical outcomes than simple random sampling.
Stratified random sampling creates layers within a sample that are extremely
accurate when it comes to representing the layers with the population, but it too can be
time consuming and tedious while creating larger samples.
Cluster (Area) Random Sampling – it is conducted when the size of a population is too
large to perform simple random sampling. Cluster sampling is a probability sampling
technique where researchers divide the population into multiple groups (clusters) for
research. Researchers then select random groups with a simple random or systematic
random sampling technique for data collection and data analysis. In this sampling
technique, researchers analyze a sample that consists of multiple sample parameters such
as demographics, habits, background – or any other population attribute, which may be
the focus of conducted research. This method is usually conducted when groups that are
similar yet internally diverse form a statistical population. Instead of selecting the entire
population, cluster sampling allows the researchers to collect data by bifurcating the data
into small, more productive groups. One of the primary applications of cluster sampling
is called area sampling, where the clusters are counties, townships, city blocks, or other
well-defined geographic sections of the population. Below are the several types of
Cluster Sampling:
Single-Stage Cluster Sampling – It is when the sampling is done just
once. In single-stage cluster sampling, a simple random sample of clusters is
selected, and data are collected from every unit in the sampled clusters.
Two-Stage Cluster Sampling – instead of selecting all the elements of a
cluster, only a handful of members are chosen from each group by implementing
systematic or simple random sampling. In two-stage cluster sampling, a simple
random sample of clusters is selected and then a simple random sample is
selected from the units in each sampled cluster.
Multiple-Stage Cluster Sampling – Multiple-stage cluster sampling
takes a step or a few steps further than two-stage sampling. In multistage
cluster sampling, rather than collect data from every single unit in the selected
clusters, you randomly select individual units from within the cluster to use as
your sample. You can then collect data from each of these individual units – this
is known as double-stage sampling. You can also continue this procedure,
taking progressively smaller and smaller random samples, which is usually
called multistage sampling. You should use this method when it is infeasible or
too expensive to test the entire cluster.
The technique is widely used in statistics where the researcher can’t collect data
from the entire population. It is the most economical and practical solution for
statisticians doing research. Take the example of a researcher who is looking to
understand the smartphone usage in Germany. In this case, the cities of Germany will
form clusters. This sampling method is also used in situations like wars and natural
calamities to draw inferences of a population, where collecting data from every individual
residing in the population is impossible.
There are multiple advantages to using cluster sampling. Here they are:
- At the first stage, you divide up the population into clusters and select some of them:
these are your primary sampling units (PSUs).
- At the second stage, you divide up your PSUs into further clusters, and select some
of them as your secondary sampling units (SSUs).
You can end at the second stage or continue this process with as many stages as you need.
In the last stage, you’ll get to your final sample of ultimate sampling units (USUs).
o You don’t need to start with a sampling frame of your target population.
o Compared to a simple random sample, it’s relatively inexpensive and effective when
you have a large or geographically dispersed population.
o It’s flexible—you can vary sampling methods between stages based on what’s
appropriate or feasible.
o Compared to simple random samples, you’ll need a larger sample size for a
multistage sample to achieve the same statistical inference properties.
o The best choice of sampling method at each stage is very subjective, so you’ll need
clear reasoning for your decision.
o It can lead to unrepresentative samples because large sections of populations may not
be selected for sampling.
The usual pattern for multi-phase sample surveys is to survey in the first phase:
In the second phase, a sub-sample of the first phase sample is usually surveyed for a
study of:
This type of sample is easier and cheaper to access, but it has a higher risk of sampling
bias. That means the inferences you can make about the population are weaker than with
probability samples, and your conclusions may be more limited. If you use a non-probability
sample, you should still aim to make it as representative of the population as possible. Non-
probability sampling techniques are often used in exploratory and qualitative research. In these
types of research, the aim is not to test a hypothesis about a broad population, but to develop an
initial understanding of a small or under-researched population.
Four types of non-probability sampling explain the purpose of this sampling method in a better
manner:
Convenience Sampling - simply includes the individuals who happen to be most accessible
to the researcher. Convenience sampling is defined as a method adopted by researchers
where they collect market research data from a conveniently available pool of respondents.
It is the most used sampling technique as it’s incredibly prompt, uncomplicated, and
economical. In many cases, members are readily approachable to be a part of the sample.
This is an easy and inexpensive way to gather initial data, but there is no way to tell if the
sample is representative of the population, so it can’t produce generalizable results.
Applications of Convenience Sampling:
1. Collect data quickly: In situations where time is a constraint, many researchers choose
this method for quick data collection. The rules to gather elements for the sample are
least complicated in comparison to techniques such as simple random sampling, stratified
sampling, and systematic sampling. Due to this simplicity, data collection takes minimal
time.
2. Inexpensive to create samples: The money and time invested in other probability
sampling methods are quite large compared to convenience sampling. It allows
researchers to generate more samples with less or no investment and in a brief period.
3. Easy to do research: The name of this surveying technique clarifies how samples are
formed. Elements are easily accessible by the researchers and so, collecting members for
the sample becomes easy.
4. Low cost: Low cost is one of the main reasons why researchers adopt this technique.
When on a small budget, researchers – especially students, can use the budget in other
areas of the project.
5. Readily available sample: Data collection is easy and accessible. Most convenience
sampling considers the population at hand. Samples are readily available to the
researcher. They do not have to move around too much for data collection. Quotas are
met quickly, and the data collection can commence even within a few hours.
6. Fewer rules to follow: It doesn’t require going through a checklist to filter members of
an audience. Here, gathering critical information and data becomes uncomplicated. For
instance, if an NGO wants to survey women’s empowerment, they can go to schools,
colleges, offices, etc. in their proximity and gather quick responses.
The best way of reducing bias in convenience sampling is to use it along with probability
sampling. Since it is usually biased, probability sampling gets the measurement parameter with it
to keep this bias under check.
After receiving a fair idea about this bias using probability sampling, the researcher can
use both convenience sampling and probability sampling techniques to draw a more accurate
estimation. The probability aspect used, along with convenience sampling, will have to be
powerful enough to overcome it. Bias can make the entire sample futile, and that’s the last thing
that a researcher needs. This bias can be reduced or eliminated by including probability
sampling.
1. No official list of names of the members: This sampling technique can be used for a
population, where there is no easily available data like their demographic information.
For example, homeless or list of members of an elite club, whose personal details cannot
be obtained easily.
2. Difficulty to locate people: People with rare diseases are quite difficult to locate.
However, if a researcher is carrying out a research study similar in nature, finding the
primary data source can be a challenge. Once he/she is identified, they usually have
information about more such similar individuals.
3. People who are not willing to be identified: If a researcher is carrying out a study
which involves collecting information/data from sex workers or victims of sexual assault
or individuals who don’t want to disclose their sexual orientations, these individuals will
fall under this category.
4. Secretiveness about their identity: People who belong to a cult or are religious
extremists or hackers usually fall under this category. A researcher will have to use
snowball sampling to identify these individuals and extract information from them.
1. It’s quicker to find samples: Referrals make it easy and quick to find subjects as they
come from reliable sources. An additional task is saved for a researcher, this time can be
used in conducting the study.
2. Cost effective: This method is cost effective as the referrals are obtained from a primary
data source. It’s convenient and not so expensive as compared to other methods.
3. Sample hesitant subjects: Some people do not want to come forward and participate in
research studies, because they don’t want their identity to be exposed. Snowball sampling
helps for this situation as they ask for a reference from people known to each other. There
are some sections of the target population which are hard to contact. For example, if a
researcher intends to understand the difficulties faced by HIV patients, other sampling
methods will not be able to provide these sensitive samples. In snowball sampling,
researchers can closely examine and filter members of a population infected by HIV and
conduct a research by talking to them, making them understand the objective
of research and eventually, analyzing the received feedback.
1. Sampling bias and margin of error: Since people refer those whom they know and
have similar traits this sampling method can have a potential sampling bias and margin of
error. This means a researcher might only be able to reach out to a small group of people
and may not be able to complete the study with conclusive results.
2. Lack of cooperation: There are fair chances even after referrals, people might not be
cooperative and refuse to participate in the research studies.
1. Saves time: Because of the involvement of a quota for sample creation, this sampling
process is quick and straightforward.
2. Research convenience: By using quota sampling and appropriate research questions,
interpreting information and responses to the survey is a much convenient process for a
researcher.
3. Accurate representation of the population of interest: Researchers effectively
represent a population using this sampling technique. There is no room for over-
representation as this sampling technique helps researchers to study the population using
specific quotas.
4. Saves money: The budget required for executing this sampling method is minimalistic.
In situations where researchers have specific criteria for conducting research, it allows
the selection of subgroups, due to which it becomes extremely convenient for researchers
to obtain desired results. A trait or characteristic can be the filter for subgroup formation.
The researcher uses this method when he/she has time constraints. Applying quotas gives
the researcher an idea of the whole population of interest in very little time.
Quotas are applied when the researcher is on a tight budget. Instead of researching a large
population, the researcher saves money by using a few quotas to get the whole picture of
the population.
Some research studies do not require pinpoint accuracy due to the nature of the research
project. It is ideal for applying to quota sampling for these studies.
Quota Sampling Process:
Step 1: Firstly, the population should be divided into mutually exclusive subgroups
Step 2: Next is to determine the proportions of the subgroups made in the previous step, since
the same proportion would be used during the sampling process
Step 3: Now, the researcher must choose individual observations or items from the subgroups.
Also, the proportions found previously are to be taken into consideration
Step 4: The last and final step is to ensure that the obtained sample should be a representative of
the whole population and allows the researcher to study characteristics and traits
References