CE World Report 800006 WEST2560

Western Digital
R/N: 800006
Report #: WEST2560
Report Prepared By Northwest EMC Inc.
NORTHWEST EMC – (888) 364-2378 – www.nwemc.com
California – Minnesota – Oregon – New York – Washington

CERTIFICATE OF TEST
WTD 12.5.23
Last Date of Test: June 19, 2014

Western Digital
Model: R/N: 800006
Emissions
Test Description Specification Test Method Pass/Fail
Radiated Emissions AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010 Class B AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010 Pass
CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005 and CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005
Radiated Emissions Pass
A2:2006) Class B and A2:2006)
Radiated Emissions CNS 13438:2006 (Complete) Class B CNS 13438:2006 (Complete) Pass
Radiated Emissions EN 55022: 2010 Class B CISPR 22:2008 Pass
Radiated Emissions FCC 15.109(g):2014 Class B ANSI C63.4:2009 Pass
Radiated Emissions FCC 15.109:2014 Class B ANSI C63.4:2009 Pass
Radiated Emissions ICES-003:2012 Class B ANSI C63.4:2009 Pass
Radiated Emissions VCCI:2013-04 Class B VCCI:2013-04 Pass
Conducted Emissions AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010 Class B AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010 Pass
CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005 and CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005
Conducted Emissions Pass
A2:2006) and A2:2006)
Conducted Emissions CNS 13438:2006 (Complete) Class B CNS 13438:2006 (Complete) Pass
Conducted Emissions EN 55022: 2010 Class B CISPR 22:2008 Pass
Conducted Emissions FCC 15.107:2014 Class B ANSI C63.4:2009 Pass
Conducted Emissions ICES-003:2012 Class B ANSI C63.4:2009 Pass
Conducted Emissions VCCI:2013-04 Class B VCCI:2013-04 Pass
Immunity
Test Description Specification Test Method Performance Criteria
ESD EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-2:2008 1
Radiated Immunity EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-3:2010 1
EFT EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-4:2012 1
Surge EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-5:2005 1
Conducted Immunity EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-6:2013 1
Magnetic Field Immunity EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-8:2009 1
Voltage Interruptions EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004 3
Voltage Dips EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004 1
Deviations From Test Standards

None
Approved By:
Victor Ratinoff, Operations Manager

NVLAP Lab Code: 200676-0
This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal
government of the United States of America.
Product compliance is the responsibility of the client, therefore the tests and equipment modes of operation represented in this report were
agreed upon by the client, prior to testing. This Report may only be duplicated in its entirety. The results of this test pertain only to the
sample(s) tested. The specific description is noted in each of the individual sections of the test report supporting this certificate of test.
Report No. WEST2560 2/140

REVISION HISTORY
REV 2012.08.02
Revision
Description Date Page Number
Number
00 None
Barometric Pressure
The recorded barometric pressure has been normalized to sea level.

ACCREDITATIONS AND
REV 2012.05.24
AUTHORIZATIONS
United States
FCC - Designated by the FCC as a Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). Certification chambers, Open Area Test Sites, and
conducted measurement facilities are listed with the FCC.
A2LA - Accredited by A2LA to ISO / IEC Guide 65 as a product certifier. This allows Northwest EMC to certify transmitters to FCC
and IC specifications.
NVLAP - Each laboratory is accredited by NVLAP to ISO 17025
Canada
IC - Recognized by Industry Canada as a Certification Body (CB). Certification chambers and Open Area Test Sites are filed with IC.
European Union
European Commission – Validated by the European Commission as a Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) under the EMC
directive and as a Notified Body under the R&TTE Directive.
Australia/New Zealand
ACMA - Recognized by ACMA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Korea
KCC / RRA - Recognized by KCC’s RRA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Japan
VCCI - Associate Member of the VCCI. Conducted and radiated measurement facilities are registered.
Taiwan
BSMI – Recognized by BSMI as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
NCC - Recognized by NCC as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Singapore
IDA – Recognized by IDA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Hong Kong
OFTA – Recognized by OFTA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Vietnam
MIC – Recognized by MIC as a CAB for the acceptance of test data.
Russia
GOST – Accredited by Certinform VNIINMASH, CERTINFO, SAMTES, and Federal CHEC to perform EMC and Hygienic testing for
Information Technology products to GOST standards.
SCOPE
For details on the Scopes of our Accreditations, please visit:
http://www.nwemc.com/accreditations/

EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTS
REV 2013.12.13
Measurement Uncertainty
When a measurement is made, the result will be different from the true or theoretically correct value. The
difference is the result of tolerances in the measurement system that cannot be completely eliminated. To the
extent that technology allows us, it has been our aim to minimize this error. Measurement uncertainty is a
statistical expression of measurement error qualified by a probability distribution.
A measurement uncertainty estimation has been performed for each test per our internal quality document WP
342. The estimation is used to compare the measured result with its "true" or theoretically correct value. The
expanded measurement uncertainty (K=2) can be found included as part of the applicable test description page.
Our measurement data meets or exceeds the measurement uncertainty requirements of the applicable
specification; therefore, the test data can be compared directly to the specification limit to determine compliance.
The calculations for estimating measurement uncertainty are based upon ETSI TR 100 028 (or CISPR 16-4-1 as
applicable), and are available upon request.
Measurement Bandwidths
Frequency Range Peak Data Quasi-Peak Data Average Data

(MHz) (kHz) (kHz) (kHz)
0.01 - 0.15 1.0 0.2 0.2
0.15 - 30.0 10.0 9.0 9.0
30.0 - 1000 100.0 120.0 120.0
Above 1000 1000.0 N/A 1000.0
Measurements were made using the bandwidths and detectors specified. No video filter was used.
Sample Calculations
Radiated Emissions:
Distance
Field Measured Antenna Cable Amplifier External
Adjustment
Strength Level Factor Factor Gain Attenuation
Factor
33.5 = 42.6 + 28.6 + 3.1 - 40.8 + 0.0 + 0.0
Conducted Emissions:
Adjusted Measured Transducer Cable External

Level Level Factor Factor Attenuation
47.1 = 26.7 + 0.3 + 0.1 + 20.0

EXPLANATION OF NWEMC
REV 2012.08.13
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
How Important Is It To Understand Performance Criteria?
It is the responsibility of the test laboratory to observe the results of the tests that are performed and to accurately report
those results. The data sheets detail the observable and repeatable performance criterion.
The variety and diversity of the apparatus within the scope of standard make it difficult to define precise criteria for the
evaluation of the immunity test results. The manufacturer has the obligation to express the performance criteria in terms
which relate to the performance of his specific product when used as intended. If the minimum performance level (or the
permissible performance loss) is not specified by the manufacturer, then it may be derived from the product description,
documentation, and/or by what the user may reasonably expect from the EUT if used as intended.
As the responsible party (manufacturer, importer, etc.) it is your responsibility that you are fully aware of the requirements,
how your device performs when tested to those requirements, and what information is being used to declare conformity.
To better assist you in making those conformity decisions, Northwest EMC has adopted a very simple, yet very clear
performance assessment procedure. The following criteria’s are used when performing immunity or susceptibility tests. In
all cases the observed phenomena will be documented in the data sheets.
Performance Criteria 1:
The EUT exhibited no change in performance when operating as specified by the manufacturer.
 In most cases this would be equivalent to Performance Criteria A. When operating the equipment in the modes or
configurations specified by the responsible party, monitoring the parameters specified, no changes were observed, user
intervention was not required, nothing happened.
The EUT exhibited a temporary change in performance when operating as specified by the manufacturer. Operator
Intervention was not required to resume normal operation.
 In most cases this would be equivalent to Performance Criteria B. When operating the equipment in the modes or
configurations specified by the responsible party, monitoring the parameters specified, a Temporary loss of function was
observed. The EUT was able to recover from those changes without any operator intervention, once the test signal was
removed. The apparatus continued to operate as intended after the test. No loss of data was observed.
 Example: During testing, an analogue function value may deviate. After the test, the deviation vanishes.
A temporary loss of function was observed. User intervention is required to restore the operation of device to the mode
specified by the responsible party.
 In most cases this would be equivalent to Performance Criteria C. When operating the equipment in the modes or
configurations specified by the responsible party, monitoring the parameters specified, changes were observed. The
EUT requires some sort of operator intervention to recover. There was no permanent damage and the EUT appeared to
function normally after completion of test.
 Example: The EUT locked up during the immunity test; User intervention is required to restore the device to the
specified mode of operation.
 In this case the equipment was damaged and/or would not recover to the mode specified by the responsible party. The
data sheets will detail the exact phenomena observed.

FACILITIES
REV 2013.06.28
Oregon California New York Minnesota Washington

Labs EV01-12 Labs OC01-13 Labs NY01-04 Labs MN01-08 Labs NC01-05,SU02,SU07
22975 NW Evergreen Pkwy 41 Tesla 4939 Jordan Rd. 9349 W Broadway Ave. 19201 120th Ave. NE
Hillsboro, OR 97124 Irvine, CA 92618 Elbridge, NY 13060 Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 Bothell, WA 98011
(503) 844-4066 (949) 861-8918 (315) 685-0796 (763) 425-2281 (425) 984-6600
VCCI
A-0108 A-0029 A-0109 A-0110
Industry Canada
2834D-1, 2834D-2 2834B-1, 2834B-2, 2834B-3 2834E-1 2834F-1
NVLAP
NVLAP Lab Code: 200630-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200676-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200761-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200881-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200629-0

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
WTD 12.5.23
Client and Equipment Under Test (EUT) Information

Company Name: Western Digital
Address: 3337 Michelson Drive
City, State, Zip: Irvine, CA 92612
Test Requested By: Troy Gomez
Model: R/N: 800006
First Date of Test: June 18, 2014
Last Date of Test: June 19, 2014
Receipt Date of Samples: June 18, 2014
Equipment Design Stage: Production
Equipment Condition: No Damage
Information Provided by the Party Requesting the Test
Functional Description of the EUT (Equipment Under Test):

3.5 inch Hard Drive -The EUT was connected to a SATA-III on-board controller port of the computer system
throughout all tests. The computer system was communicating with the drive at its fastest interface speed while
exercising a Write/ Read program. An EMI scan was performed on multiple drives, drives listed under Additional
Drives Tested, one at a time, to determine the worst-case drive. The worst-case drive has the test results
presented within this report.
Additional Drives Tested:

Drives Serial Number:
1 WCC4JF0RW3P5
2 WCC4J8UV3UFF
3 WCC4J8UV3ERP
4 WCC4J6TPF46Y
5 WCC4J6TPFTLP
6 WCC4J619N3XF
7 WCC4JF0RW11U
8 WCC4J6TPFL22
9 WCC4J8UV3RUJ
10 WCC4J6TPF102
Highest frequency generated or used in the device:

Assume the highest frequency generated or used in the device or on which the device operates or tunes is
>108MHz and <3.6GHz.
Testing Objective:
These tests were selected to satisfy the EMC requirements requested by the client.
EUT Photos:

dscn4104.jpg (3648x2736x24b jpeg)







CONFIGURATIONS
WTD 12.5.23
Configuration WEST2560- 1
Software/Firmware Running during test
Description Version
Win EMI v4.0.7
EUT
Description Manufacturer Model/Part Number Serial Number
3.5 Inch Hard Drive Western Digital R/N: 800006 WCC4J6TPF3LF
Peripherals in test setup boundary

Host Desktop PC Dell Precision T3610 DXF2FZ1
Monitor Hanns G HW173D 820NH3XY04115
Keyboard Dell SK-8215 CN-06W610-71616-49A-1N00
Mouse Microsoft X812824 None
Ethernet Switch Linksys EZXS80W RA34055016954
Digital Camera Kodak DC215 Zoom EKS01711361
Cables
Cable Type Shield Length (m) Ferrite Connection 1 Connection 2
AC Power Cable No 1.5m No AC Mains Host Desktop PC
AC Power Cable No 2m No AC Mains Monitor
Ethernet Cable No 1.8m No Ethernet Switch Host Desktop PC
DVI Cable Yes 2m Yes Monitor Host Desktop PC
USB Cable No 1.9m Yes Keyboard Host Desktop PC
USB Cable No 1.8m Yes Mouse Host Desktop PC
Serial Cable Yes 1.5m Yes Digital Camera Host Desktop PC
PA = Cable is permanently attached to the device. Shielding and/or presence of ferrite may be unknown.

CONFIGURATIONS
WTD 12.5.23
Configuration WEST2560- 2
Software/Firmware Running during test
Description Version
Win EMI v4.0.7
EUT
3.5 Inch Hard Drive Western Digital R/N: 800006 WCC4J6TPF3LF
Peripherals in test setup boundary

Host Desktop PC Dell Precision T3610 DXF2FZ1
Monitor Hanns G HW173D 820NH3XY04115
Keyboard Dell SK-8215 CN-06W610-71616-49A-1N00
Mouse Microsoft X812824 None
Digital Camera Kodak DC215 Zoom EKS01711361
Laptop Lenovo 7510 CB17044382
Cables
Cable Type Shield Length (m) Ferrite Connection 1 Connection 2
AC Power Cable No 1.5m No AC Mains Host Desktop PC
AC Power Cable No 2m No AC Mains Monitor
DVI Cable Yes 2m Yes Monitor Host Desktop PC
USB Cable No 1.9m Yes Keyboard Host Desktop PC
USB Cable No 1.8m Yes Mouse Host Desktop PC
Serial Cable Yes 1.5m Yes Digital Camera Host Desktop PC
Ethernet Cable No 2m No Remote Laptop Host Desktop PC
PA = Cable is permanently attached to the device. Shielding and/or presence of ferrite may be unknown.

MODIFICATIONS
WTD 12.5.23
Equipment Modifications
Item Date Test Modification Note Disposition of EUT

Tested as No EMI suppression EUT remained at
Radiated
1 6/18/2014 delivered to devices were added or Northwest EMC
Emissions
Test Station. modified during this test. following the test.
Conducted Tested as No EMI suppression EUT remained at
2 6/18/2014 Emissions High delivered to devices were added or Northwest EMC
Frequency Test Station. modified during this test. following the test.
Conducted
Emissions
4 6/19/2014 ESD delivered to devices were added or Northwest EMC
Radiated
Immunity
6 6/19/2014 EFT delivered to devices were added or Northwest EMC
7 6/19/2014 Surge delivered to devices were added or Northwest EMC
Conducted
Immunity
Magnetic Field
Immunity
Tested as No EMI suppression
Voltage Dips and Scheduled testing
10 6/19/2014 delivered to devices were added or
Interruptions was completed.
Test Station. modified during this test.

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a final radiated emissions test was performed. The
frequency range investigated (scanned), is also noted in this report. Radiated emissions measurements were made at the
EUT azimuth and antenna height such that the maximum radiated emissions level was detected. This required the use of a
turntable and an antenna positioner. The preferred method of a continuous azimuth search was utilized for frequency scans
of the EUT field strength with both polarities of the measuring antenna. A calibrated, linearly polarized antenna was
positioned at the specified distance from the periphery of the EUT. Tests were made with the antenna positioned in both the
horizontal and vertical planes of polarization. The antenna was varied in height above the conducting ground plane to obtain
the maximum signal strength. Though specified in the report, the measurement distance was 3 meters or 10 meters. At any
measurement distance, the antenna height was varied from 1 meter to 4 meters. These height scans apply for both
horizontal and vertical polarization, except that for vertical polarization the minimum height of the center of the antenna was
increased so that the lowest point of the bottom of the antenna cleared the ground surface by at least 25 cm.
The EUT arrangement is configured as equivalent to that occurring in normal use. Tabletop equipment is placed on a 0.8
meter high non-conductive table & for Floor-standing equipment, it is placed on, but insulated from a ground reference plane
by the use of its own rollers or stand-off supports. If measurements above 1 GHz were required, the test setup was modified
to meet the regulatory requirements for higher frequency measurements. If required, RF absorber was placed on the floor
between the measurement antenna and EUT.
The diameter of the illumination area is the dimension of the line tangent to the EUT formed by 3 dB beamwidth of the
measurement antenna at the measurement distance. At a 3 meter test distance, the diameter of the illumination area was
3.8 meters at 1 GHz and greater than 2.1 meters up to 6 GHz. Above 1 GHz, when required by the measurement standard,
the antenna is pointed for both azimuth and elevation to maintain the receive antenna within the cone of radiation from the
EUT. The specified measurement detectors were used for comparison of the emissions to the peak and average
specification limits.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Description Manufacturer Model ID Last Cal. Interval
Spectrum Analyzer Agilent E4443A AAR 06/03/2014 12 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AM-1551 AOX 03/11/2014 12 mo
OC08 Cables N/A 30MHz-6GHz RE Cables OCB 02/25/2014 12 mo
Antenna, Biconilog EMCO 3142 AXK 05/16/2012 36 mo
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Description
Expanded k=2 3.8 dB -3.8 dB
FREQUENCY RANGE INVESTIGATED

30 MHz to 1000 MHz
POWER INVESTIGATED
100VAC/50Hz
110VAC/60Hz
220VAC/60Hz
230VAC/50Hz
CONFIGURATIONS INVESTIGATED
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EUT: R/N: 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

Serial Number: WCC4J6TPF3LF Date: 06/18/2014
Customer: Western Digital Temperature: 23°C
Attendees: None Relative Humidity: 42%
Customer Project: None Bar. Pressure: 1018 mb
Tested By: Jordi Sandvik Job Site: OC08
Power: 220VAC/60Hz Configuration: WEST2560-1
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
Specification: Equipment Class B Method:
CNS 13438:2006 (Complete) CNS 13438:2006 (Complete)
TEST PARAMETERS
Run #: 2 Test Distance (m): 10 Ant. Height(s) (m): 1-4m
COMMENTS
Using Dell T3610 Desktop PC
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI
DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
MHz
Run #: 2

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #2
Ant. Test Ext. Polar. Dist. Spec.
Freq Amp. Factor Height Azimuth Dist. Atten. Trans. Adjust. Adj. Limit Margin.
(MHz) (dBuV) (dB) (m) (deg.) (m) (dB) Type Detect. (dB) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB)
745.547 39.2 -8.7 1.5 199.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 30.5 37.0 -6.5
30.474 36.6 -18.1 1.0 86.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 18.5 30.0 -11.5
992.579 31.2 -6.0 2.0 13.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 25.2 37.0 -11.8
996.885 31.3 -6.1 2.8 157.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 25.2 37.0 -11.8
902.478 31.6 -6.6 2.8 0.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 25.0 37.0 -12.0
897.937 31.7 -7.0 2.0 301.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 24.7 37.0 -12.3
952.738 31.4 -6.8 2.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 24.6 37.0 -12.4
213.022 40.1 -22.5 3.8 210.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 17.6 30.0 -12.4
142.014 43.9 -26.4 1.0 106.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 17.5 30.0 -12.5
106.509 42.3 -26.1 1.0 140.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 16.2 30.0 -13.8
213.024 37.7 -22.5 1.5 335.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 15.2 30.0 -14.8
31.034 31.7 -18.4 3.8 93.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 13.3 30.0 -16.7
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
VCCI:2012-04 VCCI:2012-04
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
MHz
Run #: 3

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #3
532.538 44.2 -12.5 2.8 188.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 31.7 37.0 -5.3
745.548 38.7 -8.7 1.0 188.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 30.0 37.0 -7.0
998.920 32.0 -6.4 3.8 0.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 25.6 37.0 -11.4
944.944 31.7 -6.9 3.8 288.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 24.8 37.0 -12.2
910.520 31.6 -6.8 2.8 309.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 24.8 37.0 -12.2
875.959 31.6 -7.7 2.8 129.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 23.9 37.0 -13.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010 AS/NZS CISPR 22:2009 + A1:2010
CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005 and A2:2006) CISPR 22:2005 (Amended by A1:2005 and A2:2006)
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
MHz
Run #: 4

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #4
639.040 43.1 -11.1 2.0 173.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 32.0 37.0 -5.0
532.539 42.3 -12.5 1.0 29.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 29.8 37.0 -7.2
958.562 36.6 -6.9 1.0 162.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 29.7 37.0 -7.3
997.907 31.7 -6.2 2.0 220.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 25.5 37.0 -11.5
985.775 31.2 -6.3 2.0 225.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 24.9 37.0 -12.1
974.905 31.4 -6.6 1.0 59.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 24.8 37.0 -12.2
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
FCC 15.109(g):2014 ANSI C63.4:2009
ICES-003:2012 ANSI C63.4:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
10 100 1000
MHz
Run #: 5

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #5
639.044 41.3 -11.1 2.6 183.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 30.2 37.0 -6.8
903.986 31.7 -6.4 1.0 231.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 25.3 37.0 -11.7
997.456 31.3 -6.2 3.8 313.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 25.1 37.0 -11.9
980.264 31.6 -6.5 2.0 74.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 25.1 37.0 -11.9
931.151 32.0 -7.2 3.8 79.0 10.0 0.0 Horz QP 0.0 24.8 37.0 -12.2
947.525 31.5 -6.9 1.5 248.0 10.0 0.0 Vert QP 0.0 24.6 37.0 -12.4
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

RADIATED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

RADIATED EMISSIONS HIGH
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
FREQUENCY 1 – 6 GHz
TEST DESCRIPTION
frequency range investigated (scanned), is also noted in this report. Radiated emissions measurements were made at the
EUT azimuth and antenna height such that the maximum radiated emissions level was detected. This required the use of a
turntable and an antenna positioner. The preferred method of a continuous azimuth search was utilized for frequency scans
of the EUT field strength with both polarities of the measuring antenna. A calibrated, linearly polarized antenna was
positioned at the specified distance from the periphery of the EUT. Tests were made with the antenna positioned in both the
horizontal and vertical planes of polarization. The antenna was varied in height above the conducting ground plane to obtain
the maximum signal strength. Though specified in the report, the measurement distance was 3 meters or 10 meters. At any
measurement distance, the antenna height was varied from 1 meter to 4 meters. These height scans apply for both
horizontal and vertical polarization, except that for vertical polarization the minimum height of the center of the antenna was
increased so that the lowest point of the bottom of the antenna cleared the ground surface by at least 25 cm.
The EUT arrangement is configured as equivalent to that occurring in normal use. Tabletop equipment is placed on a 0.8
meter high non-conductive table & for Floor-standing equipment, it is placed on, but insulated from a ground reference plane
by the use of its own rollers or stand-off supports. If measurements above 1 GHz were required, the test setup was modified
to meet the regulatory requirements for higher frequency measurements. If required, RF absorber was placed on the floor
between the measurement antenna and EUT.
measurement antenna at the measurement distance. At a 3 meter test distance, the diameter of the illumination area was
3.8 meters at 1 GHz and greater than 2.1 meters up to 6 GHz. Above 1 GHz, when required by the measurement standard,
the antenna is pointed for both azimuth and elevation to maintain the receive antenna within the cone of radiation from the
EUT. The specified measurement detectors were used for comparison of the emissions to the peak and average
specification limits.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Spectrum Analyzer Agilent N9010A AFJ 07/10/2013 24 mo
Antenna, Horn ETS 3117 AHQ 09/12/2012 36 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AMF-3D-00100800-32-13P AVJ 10/24/2013 12 mo
OC07 Cables ESM Cable Corp. 1-8GHz cables OCX 03/27/2014 12 mo
Description

1 GHz to 6 GHz
POWER INVESTIGATED
100VAC/50Hz
110VAC/60Hz
220VAC/60Hz
230VAC/50Hz
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
Tested By: Luis Flores Job Site: OC07
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
1000 10000
MHz
Run #: 4

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #4
1384.585 50.4 -7.6 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 42.8 50.0 -7.2
1597.605 48.7 -6.7 1.0 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 42.0 50.0 -8.0
2130.130 43.4 -3.8 1.1 150.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 39.6 50.0 -10.4
3195.195 43.7 -1.1 1.2 25.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 42.6 54.0 -11.4
2449.650 40.6 -5.5 1.5 155.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 35.1 50.0 -14.9
1491.100 41.3 -6.9 1.1 171.0 3.0 0.0 Horz AV 0.0 34.4 50.0 -15.6
1597.575 57.9 -6.7 1.0 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 51.2 70.0 -18.8
1384.760 58.4 -7.6 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 50.8 70.0 -19.2
1491.085 52.9 -6.9 1.1 171.0 3.0 0.0 Horz PK 0.0 46.0 70.0 -24.0
2449.370 51.4 -5.5 1.5 155.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 45.9 70.0 -24.1
2130.075 49.7 -3.8 1.1 150.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 45.9 70.0 -24.1
3195.140 50.2 -1.1 1.2 25.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 49.1 74.0 -24.9
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
1000 10000
MHz
Run #: 5

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #5
1384.585 50.6 -7.6 1.1 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 43.0 50.0 -7.0
1597.605 48.6 -6.7 1.0 194.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 41.9 50.0 -8.1
3195.195 45.8 -1.1 1.0 147.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 44.7 54.0 -9.3
2130.130 42.9 -3.8 1.2 152.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 39.1 50.0 -10.9
1597.605 45.7 -6.7 1.5 167.0 3.0 0.0 Horz AV 0.0 39.0 50.0 -11.0
1491.100 44.9 -6.9 1.4 179.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 38.0 50.0 -12.0
1384.455 59.6 -7.6 1.1 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 52.0 70.0 -18.0
1597.515 58.1 -6.7 1.0 194.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 51.4 70.0 -18.6
1597.625 56.6 -6.7 1.5 167.0 3.0 0.0 Horz PK 0.0 49.9 70.0 -20.1
1491.120 55.7 -6.9 1.4 179.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 48.8 70.0 -21.2
3195.245 51.8 -1.1 1.0 147.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 50.7 74.0 -23.3
2129.985 49.0 -3.8 1.2 152.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 45.2 70.0 -24.8
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
VCCI:2012-04 VCCI:2012-04
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
1000 10000
MHz
Run #: 6

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #6
1384.585 50.7 -7.6 1.1 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 43.1 50.0 -6.9
1597.605 47.2 -6.7 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 40.5 50.0 -9.5
3195.195 45.5 -1.1 1.0 8.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 44.4 54.0 -9.6
2130.130 41.8 -3.8 1.2 120.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 38.0 50.0 -12.0
1491.100 43.3 -6.9 1.2 169.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 36.4 50.0 -13.6
1384.515 59.9 -7.6 1.1 192.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 52.3 70.0 -17.7
1597.655 58.4 -6.7 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 51.7 70.0 -18.3
1491.260 55.6 -6.9 1.2 169.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 48.7 70.0 -21.3
3195.005 51.9 -1.1 1.0 8.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 50.8 74.0 -23.2
1526.605 31.9 -6.8 1.2 133.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 25.1 50.0 -24.9
2130.110 48.7 -3.8 1.2 120.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 44.9 70.0 -25.1
1526.535 48.4 -6.8 1.2 133.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 41.6 70.0 -28.4
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST DESCRIPTION
frequency range investigated (scanned), is also noted in this report. Radiated emissions measurements were made at the EUT
azimuth and antenna height such that the maximum radiated emissions level was detected. This required the use of a turntable
and an antenna positioner. The preferred method of a continuous azimuth search was utilized for frequency scans of the EUT
field strength with both polarities of the measuring antenna. A calibrated, linearly polarized antenna was positioned at the
specified distance from the periphery of the EUT. Tests were made with the antenna positioned in both the horizontal and
vertical planes of polarization. The antenna was varied in height above the conducting ground plane to obtain the maximum
signal strength. Though specified in the report, the measurement distance was 3 meters or 10 meters. At any measurement
distance, the antenna height was varied from 1 meter to 4 meters. These height scans apply for both horizontal and vertical
polarization, except that for vertical polarization the minimum height of the center of the antenna was increased so that the
lowest point of the bottom of the antenna cleared the ground surface by at least 25 cm.
The EUT arrangement is configured as equivalent to that occurring in normal use. Tabletop equipment is placed on a 0.8 meter
high non-conductive table & for Floor-standing equipment, it is placed on, but insulated from a ground reference plane by the
use of its own rollers or stand-off supports. If measurements above 1 GHz were required, the test setup was modified to meet
the regulatory requirements for higher frequency measurements. If required, RF absorber was placed on the floor between the
measurement antenna and EUT.
measurement antenna at the measurement distance. At a 3 meter test distance, the diameter of the illumination area was 3.8
meters at 1 GHz and greater than 2.1 meters up to 6 GHz. Above 1 GHz, when required by the measurement standard, the
antenna is pointed for both azimuth and elevation to maintain the receive antenna within the cone of radiation from the EUT. The
specified measurement detectors were used for comparison of the emissions to the peak and average specification limits.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Spectrum Analyzer Agilent N9010A AFJ 07/10/2013 24 mo
Antenna, Horn ETS 3117 AHQ 09/12/2012 36 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AMF-3D-00100800-32-13P AVJ 10/24/2013 12 mo
OC07 Cables ESM Cable Corp. 1-8GHz cables OCX 03/27/2014 12 mo
Antenna, Horn ETS 3160-07 AHX NCR 0 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AMF-6F-08001200-30-10P AVL 10/24/2013 12 mo
Antenna, Horn EMCO 3160-08 AHK NCR 0 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AMF-6F-12001800-30-10P AVP 10/24/2013 12 mo
OC07 Cables ESM Cable Corp. 8-18GHz cables OCY 03/27/2014 12 mo
OC floating Cable N/A 18-26GHz RE Cables OCK 02/06/2014 12 mo
Antenna, Horn EMCO 3160-09 AHN NCR 0 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq AMF-6F-18002650-25-10P AOI 01/10/2014 12 mo
Cable ESM Cable Corp. KMKM-72 OC1 01/09/2014 12 mo
Antenna, Horn ETS 3160-10 AIX NCR 0 mo
Pre-Amplifier Miteq JSW45-26004000-40-5P AVQ 01/10/2014 12 mo
Description

1 GHz to 40 GHz
POWER INVESTIGATED
110VAC/60Hz
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
FCC 15.109:2014 ANSI C63.4:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
80
70
60
50
dBuV/m
40
30
20
10
0
1000 10000 100000
MHz
Run #: 7

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #7
1384.585 50.9 -7.6 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 43.3 54.0 -10.7
3195.195 43.4 -1.1 1.2 1.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 42.3 54.0 -11.7
8192.565 29.1 9.9 1.2 21.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 39.0 54.0 -15.0
8168.270 29.0 9.9 1.2 33.0 3.0 0.0 Horz AV 0.0 38.9 54.0 -15.1
7384.515 27.7 10.4 1.2 238.0 3.0 0.0 Horz AV 0.0 38.1 54.0 -15.9
7715.500 27.9 10.1 1.2 161.0 3.0 0.0 Vert AV 0.0 38.0 54.0 -16.0
8193.575 42.2 9.9 1.2 21.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 52.1 74.0 -21.9
8165.630 41.5 9.8 1.2 33.0 3.0 0.0 Horz PK 0.0 51.3 74.0 -22.7
7718.400 40.9 10.1 1.2 161.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 51.0 74.0 -23.0
1384.665 58.3 -7.6 1.2 195.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 50.7 74.0 -23.3
7384.855 39.9 10.4 1.2 238.0 3.0 0.0 Horz PK 0.0 50.3 74.0 -23.7
3195.070 50.9 -1.1 1.2 1.0 3.0 0.0 Vert PK 0.0 49.8 74.0 -24.2
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, conducted emissions tests were performed. The
frequency range investigated (scanned), is also noted in this report. Conducted power line measurements are made, unless
otherwise specified, over the frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz to determine the line-to-ground radio-noise voltage
that is conducted from the EUT power-input terminals that are directly (or indirectly via separate transformer or power
supplies) connected to a public power network. Equipment is tested with power cords that are normally used or that have
electrical or shielding characteristics that are the same as those cords normally used. Typically those measurements are
made using a LISN (Line Impedance Stabilization Network), the 50 Ω measuring port is terminated by a 50 Ω EMI meter or a
50 Ω resistive load. All 50 Ω measuring ports of the LISN are terminated by 50Ω.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESCI ARG 05/13/2014 12 mo
OC06 Cables N/A Telecom Cables OCP 10/08/2013 12 mo
HP Filter TTE H97-100K-50-720B HFP 03/01/2012 36 mo
Attenuator Pasternack 6N10W-20 AWC 01/03/2014 12 mo
LISN Solar 9252-50-24-BNC LIA 04/22/2014 12 mo
LISN Solar 9252-50-24-BNC LIB 03/27/2014 12 mo
Description
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
Run #: 3 Line: High Line Ext. Attenuation (dB): 20
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
Quasi Peak Data - vs - Quasi Peak Limit Average Data - vs - Average Limit
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #3
Spec. Spec.
Freq Amp. Factor Adjusted Limit Margin Freq Amp. Factor Adjusted Limit Margin
(MHz) (dBuV) (dB) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (MHz) (dBuV) (dB) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB)
0.644 31.9 20.1 52.0 56.0 -4.0 0.644 15.8 20.1 35.9 46.0 -10.1
0.610 30.9 20.1 51.0 56.0 -5.0 0.556 14.6 20.1 34.7 46.0 -11.3
0.556 30.5 20.1 50.6 56.0 -5.4 0.548 14.3 20.1 34.4 46.0 -11.6
0.548 29.6 20.1 49.7 56.0 -6.3 0.610 13.0 20.1 33.1 46.0 -12.9
0.504 27.9 20.1 48.0 56.0 -8.0 0.504 9.8 20.1 29.9 46.0 -16.1
1.061 23.0 20.1 43.1 56.0 -12.9 1.061 7.5 20.1 27.6 46.0 -18.4
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EUT: R/N 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
Run #: 4 Line: Neutral Ext. Attenuation (dB): 20
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #4
Spec. Spec.
0.627 31.6 20.1 51.7 56.0 -4.3 0.627 16.3 20.1 36.4 46.0 -9.6
0.553 30.3 20.1 50.4 56.0 -5.6 0.650 15.1 20.1 35.2 46.0 -10.8
0.650 29.3 20.1 49.4 56.0 -6.6 0.553 14.6 20.1 34.7 46.0 -11.3
0.521 28.3 20.1 48.4 56.0 -7.6 0.584 12.2 20.1 32.3 46.0 -13.7
0.584 27.5 20.1 47.6 56.0 -8.4 0.821 10.8 20.1 30.9 46.0 -15.1
0.821 25.5 20.1 45.6 56.0 -10.4 0.521 10.5 20.1 30.6 46.0 -15.4
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
FCC 15.107:2014 ANSI C63.4:2009
ICES-003:2012 ANSI C63.4:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #5
Spec. Spec.
1.178 27.7 20.1 47.8 56.0 -8.2 1.178 14.5 20.1 34.6 46.0 -11.4
0.832 23.9 20.1 44.0 56.0 -12.0 0.832 12.1 20.1 32.2 46.0 -13.8
1.771 23.4 20.1 43.5 56.0 -12.5 1.771 11.2 20.1 31.3 46.0 -14.7
0.347 25.6 20.1 45.7 59.0 -13.3 0.513 11.2 20.1 31.3 46.0 -14.7
0.513 22.0 20.1 42.1 56.0 -13.9 0.347 12.5 20.1 32.6 49.0 -16.4
1.287 17.5 20.1 37.6 56.0 -18.4 1.287 6.8 20.1 26.9 46.0 -19.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
FCC 15.107:2014 ANSI C63.4:2009
ICES-003:2012 ANSI C63.4:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #6
Spec. Spec.
1.181 28.4 20.1 48.5 56.0 -7.5 1.181 14.5 20.1 34.6 46.0 -11.4
0.348 27.1 20.1 47.2 59.0 -11.8 0.531 12.0 20.1 32.1 46.0 -13.9
0.531 23.9 20.1 44.0 56.0 -12.0 0.832 11.9 20.1 32.0 46.0 -14.0
0.832 23.5 20.1 43.6 56.0 -12.4 0.348 13.8 20.1 33.9 49.0 -15.1
1.775 22.7 20.1 42.8 56.0 -13.2 1.775 10.3 20.1 30.4 46.0 -15.6
1.304 20.5 20.1 40.6 56.0 -15.4 1.304 6.8 20.1 26.9 46.0 -19.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #7
Spec. Spec.
0.613 31.7 20.1 51.8 56.0 -4.2 0.612 14.5 20.1 34.6 46.0 -11.4
0.569 31.6 20.1 51.7 56.0 -4.3 0.613 12.9 20.1 33.0 46.0 -13.0
0.509 28.2 20.1 48.3 56.0 -7.7 0.847 11.4 20.1 31.5 46.0 -14.5
0.470 27.5 20.1 47.6 56.5 -8.9 0.509 11.2 20.1 31.3 46.0 -14.7
0.483 27.2 20.1 47.3 56.3 -9.0 0.483 9.2 20.1 29.3 46.3 -17.0
0.900 23.8 20.1 43.9 56.0 -12.1 23.914 11.5 21.4 32.9 50.0 -17.1
0.934 23.7 20.1 43.8 56.0 -12.2 0.470 8.8 20.1 28.9 46.5 -17.6
0.730 23.5 20.1 43.6 56.0 -12.4 0.730 8.0 20.1 28.1 46.0 -17.9
0.847 23.3 20.1 43.4 56.0 -12.6 0.900 5.5 20.1 25.6 46.0 -20.4
0.368 22.3 20.1 42.4 58.5 -16.1 0.934 5.1 20.1 25.2 46.0 -20.8
0.257 17.1 20.1 37.2 61.5 -24.3 0.368 2.9 20.1 23.0 48.5 -25.5
0.251 17.1 20.1 37.2 61.7 -24.5 0.257 3.8 20.1 23.9 51.5 -27.6
23.914 13.5 21.4 34.9 60.0 -25.1 0.251 3.4 20.1 23.5 51.7 -28.2
22.429 7.9 21.2 29.1 60.0 -30.9 24.353 -0.6 21.4 20.8 50.0 -29.2
24.353 6.4 21.4 27.8 60.0 -32.2 22.429 -0.6 21.2 20.6 50.0 -29.4
5.929 6.8 20.3 27.1 60.0 -32.9 23.273 -0.8 21.3 20.5 50.0 -29.5
23.273 5.5 21.3 26.8 60.0 -33.2 25.102 -1.2 21.5 20.3 50.0 -29.7
25.102 5.1 21.5 26.6 60.0 -33.4 5.929 -0.9 20.3 19.4 50.0 -30.6
0.155 0.6 20.1 20.7 65.7 -45.0 0.155 -3.0 20.1 17.1 55.7 -38.6
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #9
Spec. Spec.
0.565 30.8 20.1 50.9 56.0 -5.1 0.565 15.7 20.1 35.8 46.0 -10.2
0.577 29.7 20.1 49.8 56.0 -6.2 0.577 14.7 20.1 34.8 46.0 -11.2
0.605 29.3 20.1 49.4 56.0 -6.6 0.540 13.4 20.1 33.5 46.0 -12.5
0.540 29.2 20.1 49.3 56.0 -6.7 0.605 12.9 20.1 33.0 46.0 -13.0
0.502 28.0 20.1 48.1 56.0 -7.9 0.856 11.9 20.1 32.0 46.0 -14.0
0.499 27.8 20.1 47.9 56.0 -8.1 0.502 10.9 20.1 31.0 46.0 -15.0
0.453 27.5 20.1 47.6 56.8 -9.2 0.499 10.0 20.1 30.1 46.0 -15.9
0.856 26.2 20.1 46.3 56.0 -9.7 0.453 8.3 20.1 28.4 46.8 -18.4
0.370 22.9 20.1 43.0 58.5 -15.5 0.918 6.2 20.1 26.3 46.0 -19.7
0.283 18.8 20.1 38.9 60.7 -21.8 0.370 3.7 20.1 23.8 48.5 -24.7
0.237 18.1 20.1 38.2 62.2 -24.0 0.283 5.6 20.1 25.7 50.7 -25.0
23.914 12.5 21.4 33.9 60.0 -26.1 0.237 4.4 20.1 24.5 52.2 -27.7
29.746 7.3 21.9 29.2 60.0 -30.8 29.746 0.2 21.9 22.1 50.0 -27.9
29.993 7.2 21.9 29.1 60.0 -30.9 29.993 0.0 21.9 21.9 50.0 -28.1
28.974 5.9 21.8 27.7 60.0 -32.3 28.974 -1.0 21.8 20.8 50.0 -29.2
28.206 5.4 21.7 27.1 60.0 -32.9 28.206 -1.5 21.7 20.2 50.0 -29.8
21.401 3.1 21.2 24.3 60.0 -35.7 21.401 -2.5 21.2 18.7 50.0 -31.3
0.164 1.9 20.1 22.0 65.2 -43.2 0.164 -2.0 20.1 18.1 55.2 -37.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
VCCI:2012-04 VCCI:2012-04
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #10

Spec. Spec.
0.498 25.2 20.1 45.3 56.0 -10.7 0.498 10.3 20.1 30.4 46.0 -15.6
1.253 22.9 20.1 43.0 56.0 -13.0 1.253 6.4 20.1 26.5 46.0 -19.5
2.541 20.7 20.1 40.8 56.0 -15.2 1.764 5.9 20.1 26.0 46.0 -20.0
1.764 20.4 20.1 40.5 56.0 -15.5 2.541 5.0 20.1 25.1 46.0 -20.9
3.045 20.1 20.2 40.3 56.0 -15.7 3.045 4.6 20.2 24.8 46.0 -21.2
0.984 18.9 20.1 39.0 56.0 -17.0 0.984 4.5 20.1 24.6 46.0 -21.4
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
VCCI:2012-04 VCCI:2012-04
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
RESULTS - Run #11

Spec. Spec.
1.310 26.6 20.1 46.7 56.0 -9.3 1.052 12.5 20.1 32.6 46.0 -13.4
1.052 26.4 20.1 46.5 56.0 -9.5 1.310 12.1 20.1 32.2 46.0 -13.8
0.494 25.0 20.1 45.1 56.1 -11.0 0.494 9.7 20.1 29.8 46.1 -16.3
2.621 24.9 20.1 45.0 56.0 -11.0 2.095 8.9 20.1 29.0 46.0 -17.0
2.080 24.8 20.1 44.9 56.0 -11.1 2.621 8.7 20.1 28.8 46.0 -17.2
2.095 24.7 20.1 44.8 56.0 -11.2 2.080 8.7 20.1 28.8 46.0 -17.2
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
TEST DESCRIPTION
The purpose of these tests is to measure the common mode disturbance emitted at the telecommunication ports of an EUT.
The wanted signal may contribute to those common mode disturbances. Assessment of common mode (asymmetric mode)
current or voltage disturbances at telecommunication ports for attachment of unscreened balanced pairs shall be performed
with the telecommunication port connected by a cable to an ISN; thus the ISN shall define the common mode termination
impedance seen by the telecommunication port during the disturbance measurements. The ISN shall allow normal operation
of the EUT, and to this end shall be interposed in the signal cable between the EUT and any auxiliary/associated equipment
(AE) or load required to exercise the EUT. The properties and characteristics of the ISN are described in EN 55022/CISPR
22. In some cases the use of an ISN may not be applicable, alternative methods described in the standard may also be
employed. The manufacturer has confirmed LAN utilization in excess of 10%, sustained for a minimum of 250 ms.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESCI ARG 05/13/2014 12 mo
OC06 Cables N/A Telecom Cables OCP 10/08/2013 12 mo
HP Filter TTE H97-100K-50-720B HFP 03/01/2012 36 mo
Attenuator Pasternack 6N10W-20 AWC 01/03/2014 12 mo
LISN Solar 9252-50-24-BNC LIA 04/22/2014 12 mo
LISN Solar 9252-50-24-BNC LIB 03/27/2014 12 mo
ISN Teseq T800 NIN 12/06/2012 24 mo
Description
WEST2560-2
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI, 100Mbps Ethernet Speed.
Win EMI, 1Gbps Ethernet Speed.
Win EMI, Idle Ethernet Speed.

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
Configuration: WEST2560-2
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
Run #: 13 Line: Ethernet Ext. Attenuation (dB): 20
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES


None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
RESULTS - Run #13
Spec. Spec.
2.352 20.4 29.5 49.9 74.0 -24.1 0.566 15.3 29.8 45.1 64.0 -18.9
0.808 20.0 29.7 49.7 74.0 -24.3 18.479 13.9 29.9 43.8 64.0 -20.2
1.618 17.6 29.5 47.1 74.0 -26.9 23.915 13.7 30.1 43.8 64.0 -20.2
0.566 15.4 29.8 45.2 74.0 -28.8 0.850 11.7 29.7 41.4 64.0 -22.6
23.915 14.4 30.1 44.5 74.0 -29.5 1.233 10.2 29.6 39.8 64.0 -24.2
18.479 14.3 29.9 44.2 74.0 -29.8 0.808 9.7 29.7 39.4 64.0 -24.6
1.233 13.0 29.6 42.6 74.0 -31.4 1.618 9.3 29.5 38.8 64.0 -25.2
0.850 12.2 29.7 41.9 74.0 -32.1 2.352 8.4 29.5 37.9 64.0 -26.1
0.500 4.9 29.8 34.7 74.0 -39.3 0.500 2.8 29.8 32.6 64.0 -31.4
14.423 4.6 29.8 34.4 74.0 -39.6 9.759 -2.5 29.6 27.1 64.0 -36.9
14.968 4.3 29.8 34.1 74.0 -39.9 14.423 -3.7 29.8 26.1 64.0 -37.9
9.759 2.8 29.6 32.4 74.0 -41.6 14.968 -3.8 29.8 26.0 64.0 -38.0
13.170 1.5 29.8 31.3 74.0 -42.7 13.170 -4.0 29.8 25.8 64.0 -38.2
0.347 1.8 29.8 31.6 77.0 -45.4 0.451 -3.9 29.8 25.9 64.9 -39.0
0.451 -0.8 29.8 29.0 74.9 -45.9 0.347 -1.8 29.8 28.0 67.0 -39.0
0.301 -1.0 29.9 28.9 78.2 -49.4 0.301 -3.9 29.9 26.0 68.2 -42.3
0.242 -0.2 29.9 29.7 80.0 -50.3 0.242 -3.3 29.9 26.6 70.0 -43.4
0.159 -0.1 29.9 29.8 83.5 -53.7 0.159 -3.2 29.9 26.7 73.5 -46.8
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES


None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
RESULTS - Run #14
Spec. Spec.
15.022 24.7 29.8 54.5 74.0 -19.5 0.808 13.6 29.7 43.3 64.0 -20.7
13.006 24.1 29.8 53.9 74.0 -20.1 1.233 10.4 29.6 40.0 64.0 -24.0
15.083 23.3 29.8 53.1 74.0 -20.9 1.233 10.3 29.6 39.9 64.0 -24.1
11.540 21.9 29.7 51.6 74.0 -22.4 1.233 10.2 29.6 39.8 64.0 -24.2
10.991 21.5 29.7 51.2 74.0 -22.8 1.617 9.2 29.5 38.7 64.0 -25.3
18.442 19.9 29.9 49.8 74.0 -24.2 0.410 8.7 29.8 38.5 65.6 -27.1
2.355 18.6 29.5 48.1 74.0 -25.9 15.022 0.7 29.8 30.5 64.0 -33.5
1.617 17.7 29.5 47.2 74.0 -26.8 15.083 0.2 29.8 30.0 64.0 -34.0
4.091 15.8 29.4 45.2 74.0 -28.8 13.006 0.1 29.8 29.9 64.0 -34.1
1.233 13.1 29.6 42.7 74.0 -31.3 11.540 -0.3 29.7 29.4 64.0 -34.6
1.233 13.0 29.6 42.6 74.0 -31.4 18.442 -0.8 29.9 29.1 64.0 -34.9
1.233 13.0 29.6 42.6 74.0 -31.4 10.991 -1.1 29.7 28.6 64.0 -35.4
0.410 11.4 29.8 41.2 75.6 -34.4 18.443 -1.4 29.9 28.5 64.0 -35.5
0.498 4.2 29.8 34.0 74.0 -40.0 4.091 -2.8 29.4 26.6 64.0 -37.4
0.363 0.6 29.8 30.4 76.7 -46.2 0.363 -3.7 29.8 26.1 66.7 -40.5
0.243 0.9 29.9 30.8 80.0 -49.2 0.243 -3.3 29.9 26.6 70.0 -43.4
0.160 -0.1 29.9 29.8 83.5 -53.7 0.160 -3.3 29.9 26.6 73.5 -46.9
0.156 -0.1 29.9 29.8 83.7 -53.9 0.156 -3.2 29.9 26.7 73.7 -47.0
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI, 1Gbps Ethernet Speed.

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
RESULTS - Run #17
Spec. Spec.
15.020 21.6 29.8 51.4 74.0 -22.6 1.233 9.1 29.6 38.7 64.0 -25.3
17.097 20.6 29.9 50.5 74.0 -23.5 0.808 8.6 29.7 38.3 64.0 -25.7
18.504 20.5 29.9 50.4 74.0 -23.6 0.411 8.4 29.8 38.2 65.6 -27.4
17.220 20.2 29.9 50.1 74.0 -23.9 2.353 7.0 29.5 36.5 64.0 -27.5
16.979 18.7 29.9 48.6 74.0 -25.4 1.616 5.7 29.5 35.2 64.0 -28.8
2.353 18.9 29.5 48.4 74.0 -25.6 0.500 1.8 29.8 31.6 64.0 -32.4
0.808 18.4 29.7 48.1 74.0 -25.9 15.020 -1.0 29.8 28.8 64.0 -35.2
17.896 17.4 29.9 47.3 74.0 -26.7 17.097 -1.4 29.9 28.5 64.0 -35.5
1.616 15.3 29.5 44.8 74.0 -29.2 18.504 -1.6 29.9 28.3 64.0 -35.7
1.233 11.6 29.6 41.2 74.0 -32.8 17.220 -1.9 29.9 28.0 64.0 -36.0
2.811 9.8 29.5 39.3 74.0 -34.7 16.979 -2.4 29.9 27.5 64.0 -36.5
0.411 10.8 29.8 40.6 75.6 -35.0 17.896 -2.5 29.9 27.4 64.0 -36.6
4.640 9.4 29.4 38.8 74.0 -35.2 4.640 -3.1 29.4 26.3 64.0 -37.7
0.500 4.3 29.8 34.1 74.0 -39.9 2.811 -3.3 29.5 26.2 64.0 -37.8
0.347 2.4 29.8 32.2 77.0 -44.8 0.347 -1.1 29.8 28.7 67.0 -38.3
0.446 -0.4 29.8 29.4 74.9 -45.5 0.446 -3.5 29.8 26.3 64.9 -38.6
0.245 1.6 29.9 31.5 79.9 -48.5 0.245 -3.4 29.9 26.5 69.9 -43.5
0.153 -0.1 29.9 29.8 83.8 -54.0 0.153 -3.2 29.9 26.7 73.8 -47.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55022: 2010 CISPR 22:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI, Idle Ethernet Speed.

None
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
dBuV/m
dBuV/m
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 1 10 100 0 1 10 100
MHz MHz

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS
RESULTS - Run #18
Spec. Spec.
16.228 28.4 29.8 58.2 74.0 -15.8 16.228 28.7 29.8 58.5 64.0 -5.5
18.243 28.3 29.9 58.2 74.0 -15.8 18.243 28.6 29.9 58.5 64.0 -5.5
17.694 27.7 29.9 57.6 74.0 -16.4 17.694 28.0 29.9 57.9 64.0 -6.1
16.167 27.0 29.8 56.8 74.0 -17.2 16.167 27.3 29.8 57.1 64.0 -6.9
18.305 26.6 29.9 56.5 74.0 -17.5 18.305 26.9 29.9 56.8 64.0 -7.2
23.128 26.3 30.0 56.3 74.0 -17.7 23.128 26.6 30.0 56.6 64.0 -7.4
0.809 18.7 29.7 48.4 74.0 -25.6 1.267 18.4 29.6 48.0 64.0 -16.0
2.352 18.7 29.5 48.2 74.0 -25.8 1.023 17.8 29.6 47.4 64.0 -16.6
1.267 18.3 29.6 47.9 74.0 -26.1 3.038 15.8 29.5 45.3 64.0 -18.7
1.023 17.7 29.6 47.3 74.0 -26.7 0.809 9.9 29.7 39.6 64.0 -24.4
1.617 16.0 29.5 45.5 74.0 -28.5 0.411 9.8 29.8 39.6 65.6 -26.0
3.038 16.0 29.5 45.5 74.0 -28.5 2.352 6.8 29.5 36.3 64.0 -27.7
0.411 13.6 29.8 43.4 75.6 -32.2 1.617 6.7 29.5 36.2 64.0 -27.8
0.500 6.7 29.8 36.5 74.0 -37.5 0.351 8.2 29.8 38.0 66.9 -28.9
0.351 9.1 29.8 38.9 76.9 -38.0 0.500 4.4 29.8 34.2 64.0 -29.8
0.242 0.1 29.9 30.0 80.0 -50.1 0.242 -3.3 29.9 26.6 70.0 -43.5
0.155 0.0 29.9 29.9 83.7 -53.8 0.155 -3.2 29.9 26.7 73.7 -47.0
0.153 0.0 29.9 29.9 83.8 -53.9 0.153 -3.2 29.9 26.7 73.8 -47.1
CONCLUSION
Pass
Tested By

TELECOM CONDUCTED
WTD.2013.07.23, PSA-ESCI 2014.04.28, EmiR5 2014.03.06
EMISSIONS

ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, the ESD Immunity test was performed according to
the test method and the product related standard(s) listed on the data sheets. If called out, contact discharges were applied
to the conductive accessible surfaces of the EUT and the coupling plane(s). If called out, air discharges were applied to
accessible insulating surfaces and conductive non-accessible portions of accessible parts of the EUT as required by the
product related standard. The number of discharges specified on the data sheets applies to each test voltage, preselected
point, and each polarity (ie 25 at +4 kV and 25 at -4 kV). If the EUT was tested with a vertical coupling plane, testing on all
four sides (front, back, left, right) was performed unless otherwise noted. The pictures depict one of those orientations. If a
response was detected after discharge, the type of response, discharge level, and location were noted.
TEST EQUIPMENT
ESD Gun Teseq NSG 437 IGN 06/02/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23

Power: 220VAC/60Hz
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
Specification: Method:
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-2:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
Energy Storage Capacitor: 150pf Discharge Resistance: 330 ohms
Polarity of Output Voltage: Positive and Negative Time Between Successive Discharges: >= 1 sec
COMMENTS
Using Dell T3610 Desktop PC.
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None
EUT FUNCTIONS MONITORED

Monitored Win EMI software for read/write errors and lockups.
TEST RESULT
See the following data sheets.
CONCLUSION
Meets NWEMC Performance Criteria 1
The EUT exhibited no change in performance when operating as specified by
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23
AIR DISCHARGE – OBSERVATIONS

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15
Number of Discharges 10 10 10 10
1 1 1
1
1
OBSERVATIONS (See Arrows)

Arrow No. Voltage Observation
1 All No Phenomena Observed
Note: The arrow colors have no meaning.

WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15
1
1
1
1


WTD.2013.07.23
CONTACT DISCHARGE – OBSERVATIONS

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8
1
1


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, the ESD Immunity test was performed according to
the test method and the product related standard(s) listed on the data sheets. If called out, contact discharges were applied
to the conductive accessible surfaces of the EUT and the coupling plane(s). If called out, air discharges were applied to
accessible insulating surfaces and conductive non-accessible portions of accessible parts of the EUT as required by the
product related standard. The number of discharges specified on the data sheets applies to each test voltage, preselected
point, and each polarity (ie 25 at +4 kV and 25 at -4 kV). If the EUT was tested with a vertical coupling plane, testing on all
four sides (front, back, left, right) was performed unless otherwise noted. The pictures depict one of those orientations. If a
response was detected after discharge, the type of response, discharge level, and location were noted.
TEST EQUIPMENT
ESD Gun Teseq NSG 437 IGN 06/02/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23

Power: 220VAC/60Hz
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-2:2008
TEST PARAMETERS
Energy Storage Capacitor: 150pf Discharge Resistance: 330 ohms
Polarity of Output Voltage: Positive and Negative Time Between Successive Discharges: >= 1 sec
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

TEST RESULT
See the following data sheets.
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15
1 1 1
1
1


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 8 +/- 15
1
1
1
1


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8
1
1


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


WTD.2013.07.23

ESD Test Level (kV) +/- 2 +/- 4 +/- 6 +/- 8


RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Radiated RF Immunity test was performed
according to IEC 61000-4-3. The field was first established with no EUT present then maintained at the specified level. If an
error is detected, the field strength may have been reduced to a level in which the error disappeared. This would be
determined as the threshold of susceptibility. The test was conducted using horizontal and vertical antenna orientations.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Signal Generator Agilent N5181A TGZ 08/08/2012 36 mo
E-Field Probe Kit Amplifier Research FL7006 IEM 05/06/2014 24 mo
RF Power Meter Amplifier Research PM2002 SPD 03/13/2014 24 mo
Power Head Amplifier Research PH2000 SPN 03/13/2014 24 mo
Power Head Amplifier Research PH2000 SQS 03/13/2014 24 mo
Antenna, Log Periodic EMCO 3144 ALK NCR 0 mo
RF Amplifier Amplifier Research 500W1000A TRQ NCR 0 mo
Dual Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC6180A IRF NCR 0 mo
Antenna, Horn EMCO 3115 AHA 08/24/2011 36 mo
Microwave Amplifier Amplifier Research 50S1G4A TRU NCR 0 mo
Dual Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC7144A IRG NCR 0 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-3:2010
TEST PARAMETERS
Test Level: >= 10V/m Spec. Level: 3 V/m Mod. Type: AM
Start Frequency: 80MHz Stop Frequency: 2000MHz Mod. Frequency: 1kHz
Mod. Depth: 80% Step Size: 1% Dwell Time: 1 Sec.
SIDES TESTED
Front, Back, Left, Right
POLARITIES TESTED
Horizontal, Vertical
TEST DISTANCE
3m for 80 to 1000MHz and 1.25m for 1 to 2 GHz
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

CLOCKS AND OSCILLATORS

No Clock or Oscillator frequencies are within the test frequencies.
OBSERVATIONS
There were no observations reported.
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Radiated RF Immunity test was performed
according to IEC 61000-4-3. The field was first established with no EUT present then maintained at the specified level. If an
error is detected, the field strength may have been reduced to a level in which the error disappeared. This would be
determined as the threshold of susceptibility. The test was conducted using horizontal and vertical antenna orientations.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Signal Generator Agilent N5181A TGZ 08/08/2012 36 mo
E-Field Probe Kit Amplifier Research FL7006 IEM 05/06/2014 24 mo
RF Power Meter Amplifier Research PM2002 SPD 03/13/2014 24 mo
Power Head Amplifier Research PH2000 SQS 03/13/2014 24 mo
Antenna, Log Periodic EMCO 3144 ALK NCR 0 mo
RF Amplifier Amplifier Research 500W1000A TRQ NCR 0 mo
Dual Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC6180A IRF NCR 0 mo
Antenna, Horn EMCO 3115 AHA 08/24/2011 36 mo
Microwave Amplifier Amplifier Research 50S1G4A TRU NCR 0 mo
Dual Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC7144A IRG NCR 0 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-3:2010
TEST PARAMETERS
Test Level: >= 10V/m Spec. Level: 3 V/m Mod. Type: AM
Start Frequency: 80MHz Stop Frequency: 2000MHz Mod. Frequency: 1kHz
Mod. Depth: 80% Step Size: 1% Dwell Time: 1 Sec.
SIDES TESTED
Front, Back, Left, Right
POLARITIES TESTED
Horizontal, Vertical
TEST DISTANCE
3m for 80 to 1000MHz and 1.25m for 1 to 2 GHz
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None


OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

RADIATED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT
WTD.2013.07.23
BURST
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, an EFT/Burst Immunity test was performed. The test
is intended to demonstrate the immunity of electrical and electronic equipment when subjected to types of transient
disturbances such as those originating from switching transients (interruption of inductive loads, relay contact bounce, etc.).
The repetitive fast transient test is a test with bursts consisting of a number of fast transients, coupled into power supply,
control and signal ports of electrical and electronic equipment. Significant for the test is short rise time, the repetition rate
and the low energy of the transients. Unless noted, AC Terminals are tested using common mode coupling (simultaneous
coupling to all lines versus the ground reference plane). The cable between the EUT and the coupling device, if detachable,
shall be as short as possible to comply with the requirements. If the manufacturer provides a cable exceeding the distance
between the coupling device end the point of entry of the EUT, the excess length of this cable shall be bundled and situated
at a distance of 0.1m above the ground plane.
TEST EQUIPMENT
EFT/SRGE/VDI Test System Haefely Ecompact 4 IBT 06/08/2014 12 mo
EFT Clamp Amplifier Research N/A ICL 04/14/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23
BURST
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-4:2012
TEST PARAMETERS
Period Time: 300mS ± 20% Duration of Burst: 15mS ±20%,
Relation of Power Supply: Asynchronous Risetime of One Pulse: 5nS ± 30%
Frequency of Burst: 5kHz Impulse Duration: 50nS ± 30%
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Line Voltage Observation
All Lines +1kV No Phenomena Observed
All Lines -1kV No Phenomena Observed
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23
BURST

WTD.2013.07.23
BURST
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, an EFT/Burst Immunity test was performed. The test
is intended to demonstrate the immunity of electrical and electronic equipment when subjected to types of transient
disturbances such as those originating from switching transients (interruption of inductive loads, relay contact bounce, etc.).
The repetitive fast transient test is a test with bursts consisting of a number of fast transients, coupled into power supply,
control and signal ports of electrical and electronic equipment. Significant for the test is short rise time, the repetition rate
and the low energy of the transients. Unless noted, AC Terminals are tested using common mode coupling (simultaneous
coupling to all lines versus the ground reference plane). The cable between the EUT and the coupling device, if detachable,
shall be as short as possible to comply with the requirements. If the manufacturer provides a cable exceeding the distance
between the coupling device end the point of entry of the EUT, the excess length of this cable shall be bundled and situated
at a distance of 0.1m above the ground plane.
TEST EQUIPMENT
EFT Clamp Amplifier Research N/A ICL 04/14/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23
BURST
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-4:2012
TEST PARAMETERS
Period Time: 300mS ± 20% Duration of Burst: 15mS ±20%,
Relation of Power Supply: Asynchronous Risetime of One Pulse: 5nS ± 30%
Frequency of Burst: 5kHz Impulse Duration: 50nS ± 30%
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Line Voltage Observation
All Lines +1kV No Phenomena Observed
All Lines -1kV No Phenomena Observed
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23
BURST

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Surge Immunity test was performed. The task of
the defined laboratory test is to find the reaction of the EUT under specified operational conditions caused by surge voltages
from switching and lightning effects at certain threat levels.
The major mechanisms by which lightning produces surge voltages are the following:
a) A direct lightning strike to an external circuit (outdoor) injecting high currents
producing voltages by either flowing through earth resistance or flowing through the impedance of the external circuit;
b) An indirect lightning strike (i.e. a strike between or within clouds or to nearby objects which produces electromagnetic
fields) that induces voltages/currents on the conductors outside and/or inside a building;
c) Lightning earth current flow resulting from nearby direct-to-earth discharges coupling into the common earth paths of the
earthing system of the installation.
If not otherwise specified the power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling network shall not exceed 2 m in
length.
TEST EQUIPMENT
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-5:2005
TEST PARAMETERS
Open Circuit Voltage, Risetime: 1.2 us ± 30% Short Circuit Current, Risetime: 8 us ± 20%
Open Circuit Voltage, Time to ½ Value: 50 us ± 20% Short Circuit Current, Time to ½ Value: 20 us ± 20%
Time Between Successive Pulses: <= 1/minute
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

RESULTS
8x20 uS Surges, 5 Surges Each Setting
COMMON MODE COMMON MODE DIFFERENTIAL MODE
LOW LINE TO GROUND HIGH LINE TO GROUND HIGH LINE TO LOW LINE
(12Ω IMPEDANCE) (12Ω IMPEDANCE) (2Ω IMPEDANCE)
kV 0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 90° 180° 270°
0.5 A A A A A A A A A A A A
-0.5 A A A A A A A A A A A A
2.0 A A A A A A A A B B B B
-2.0 A A A A A A A A B B B B
OBSERVATIONS
Item Observation
A No Phenomena Observed
B Not tested
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Surge Immunity test was performed. The task of
the defined laboratory test is to find the reaction of the EUT under specified operational conditions caused by surge voltages
from switching and lightning effects at certain threat levels.
The major mechanisms by which lightning produces surge voltages are the following:
a) A direct lightning strike to an external circuit (outdoor) injecting high currents
producing voltages by either flowing through earth resistance or flowing through the impedance of the external circuit;
b) An indirect lightning strike (i.e. a strike between or within clouds or to nearby objects which produces electromagnetic
fields) that induces voltages/currents on the conductors outside and/or inside a building;
c) Lightning earth current flow resulting from nearby direct-to-earth discharges coupling into the common earth paths of the
earthing system of the installation.
If not otherwise specified the power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling network shall not exceed 2 m in
length.
TEST EQUIPMENT
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-5:2005
TEST PARAMETERS
Open Circuit Voltage, Risetime: 1.2 us ± 30% Short Circuit Current, Risetime: 8 us ± 20%
Open Circuit Voltage, Time to ½ Value: 50 us ± 20% Short Circuit Current, Time to ½ Value: 20 us ± 20%
Time Between Successive Pulses: <= 1/minute
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

RESULTS
8x20 uS Surges, 5 Surges Each Setting
COMMON MODE COMMON MODE DIFFERENTIAL MODE
LOW LINE TO GROUND HIGH LINE TO GROUND HIGH LINE TO LOW LINE
(12Ω IMPEDANCE) (12Ω IMPEDANCE) (2Ω IMPEDANCE)
kV 0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 90° 180° 270°
2.0 A A A A A A A A B B B B
-2.0 A A A A A A A A B B B B
OBSERVATIONS
Item Observation
A No Phenomena Observed
B Not tested
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

SURGE IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Conducted RF Immunity test was performed. The
source of disturbance covered by the standard is basically an electromagnetic field, coming from intended RF transmitters,
that may act on the whole length of cables connected to an installed equipment. The dimensions of the disturbed
equipment, mostly a sub-part of a larger system, are assumed to be small compared with the wavelengths involved. The
ingoing and outgoing leads: e.g. mains, communication lines, and interface cables, behave as passive receiving antenna
networks because they can be several wavelengths long. The use of coupling and decoupling devices to apply the
disturbing signal to one cable at a time, while keeping all other cables non-excited, can only approximate the real situation
where disturbing sources act on all cables simultaneously, with a range of different amplitudes and phases. Coupling and
decoupling devices are defined by their characteristics. Any coupling and decoupling device fulfilling these characteristics
can be used. Unless permanently attached, the power cable between the coupling and decoupling devices and the EUT
shall be as short as possible and shall not be bundled or wrapped. Their height above the ground reference plane shall be
between 30 mm and 50 mm.
Anytime there are issues when an injection probe is used with Conducted RF Immunity, an over current check is run on the
affected cable(s) The test is only rerun if an over current situation is found. This will be noted in the data sheet.
TEST EQUIPMENT
RF Amplifier Amplifier Research 150A 100B TRI NCR 0 mo
Attenuator, 6 dB, 'N' Fairview Microwave SA8N150-06 TLI NCR 0 mo
Signal Generator Rohde & Schwarz SML01 TGT 02/10/2014 36 mo
Power Meter Amplifier Research PM2002 SQA 03/14/2014 12 mo
Power Head Amplifier Research PH2000 SPP 03/04/2014 12 mo
Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC2600A IRS 03/04/2014 24 mo
CDN EMCO CDN-M3 INX 02/18/2013 24 mo
CDN ETS CDN-M3 INZ 04/23/2014 12 mo
50 Ohm terminator, 'BNC' Coaxicom 2910M-15-9 TMR 03/18/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-6:2013
TEST PARAMETERS
Test Level: >= 3 VRMS Spec. Level: 3 VRMS Mod. Type: AM
Start Frequency: 150kHz Stop Frequency: 80MHz Mod. Frequency: 1kHz
Mod. Depth: 80% Step Size: 1% Dwell Time: 1sec.
CABLES TESTED
AC Power Cable
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None


OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Conducted RF Immunity test was performed. The
source of disturbance covered by the standard is basically an electromagnetic field, coming from intended RF transmitters,
that may act on the whole length of cables connected to an installed equipment. The dimensions of the disturbed
equipment, mostly a sub-part of a larger system, are assumed to be small compared with the wavelengths involved. The
ingoing and outgoing leads: e.g. mains, communication lines, and interface cables, behave as passive receiving antenna
networks because they can be several wavelengths long. The use of coupling and decoupling devices to apply the
disturbing signal to one cable at a time, while keeping all other cables non-excited, can only approximate the real situation
where disturbing sources act on all cables simultaneously, with a range of different amplitudes and phases. Coupling and
decoupling devices are defined by their characteristics. Any coupling and decoupling device fulfilling these characteristics
can be used. Unless permanently attached, the power cable between the coupling and decoupling devices and the EUT
shall be as short as possible and shall not be bundled or wrapped. Their height above the ground reference plane shall be
between 30 mm and 50 mm.
Anytime there are issues when an injection probe is used with Conducted RF Immunity, an over current check is run on the
affected cable(s) The test is only rerun if an over current situation is found. This will be noted in the data sheet.
TEST EQUIPMENT
RF Amplifier Amplifier Research 150A 100B TRI NCR 0 mo
Attenuator, 6 dB, 'N' Fairview Microwave SA8N150-06 TLI NCR 0 mo
Signal Generator Rohde & Schwarz SML01 TGT 02/10/2014 36 mo
Power Meter Amplifier Research PM2002 SQA 03/14/2014 12 mo
Power Head Amplifier Research PH2000 SPP 03/04/2014 12 mo
Directional Coupler Amplifier Research DC2600A IRS 03/04/2014 24 mo
CDN EMCO CDN-M3 INX 02/18/2013 24 mo
CDN ETS CDN-M3 INZ 04/23/2014 12 mo
50 Ohm terminator, 'BNC' Coaxicom 2910M-15-9 TMR 03/18/2014 12 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-6:2013
TEST PARAMETERS
Test Level: >= 3 VRMS Spec. Level: 3 VRMS Mod. Type: AM
Start Frequency: 150kHz Stop Frequency: 80MHz Mod. Frequency: 1kHz
Mod. Depth: 80% Step Size: 1% Dwell Time: 1sec.
CABLES TESTED
AC Power Cable
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None


OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

CONDUCTED IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23

MAGNETIC FIELD IMMUNITY
WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity test was
performed. The tests are intended to demonstrate the immunity of equipment when subjected to power frequency magnetic
fields related to the specific location and installation condition of the equipment (e.g. proximity of equipment to the
disturbance source). The power frequency magnetic field is generated by power frequency current in conductors or, rarely,
from other devices (e.g. leakage or transformers) in the proximity of equipment.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Programmable Power Supply Hewlett-Packard 6843A THB 02/08/2013 36 mo
Loop, Mag Field Northwest EMC 2.6 Meter AZE 10/08/2012 36 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-8:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
Test Level: 3 A/m Test Frequency: 50Hz
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
X No Phenomena Observed
Y No Phenomena Observed
Z No Phenomena Observed
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-8:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23

WTD.2013.07.23

WTD.2013.07.23
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity test was
performed. The tests are intended to demonstrate the immunity of equipment when subjected to power frequency magnetic
fields related to the specific location and installation condition of the equipment (e.g. proximity of equipment to the
disturbance source). The power frequency magnetic field is generated by power frequency current in conductors or, rarely,
from other devices (e.g. leakage or transformers) in the proximity of equipment.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Programmable Power Supply Hewlett-Packard 6843A THB 02/08/2013 36 mo
Loop, Mag Field Northwest EMC 2.6 Meter AZE 10/08/2012 36 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-8:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23

TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-8:2009
TEST PARAMETERS
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
CONCLUSION
the manufacturer.
Tested By

WTD.2013.07.23

WTD.2013.07.23

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Voltage interruption and dip Immunity test was
performed. The standard applies to electrical and electronic equipment having a rated input current not exceeding 16 A per
phase. It does not apply to electrical and electronic equipment for connection to D.C. networks or 400 Hz A.C. networks.
Electrical and electronic equipment may be affected by voltage dips, short interruptions or voltage variations of power supply.
Voltage dips and short interruptions are caused by faults in the network, in installations or by a sudden large change of load.
In certain cases, two or more consecutive dips or interruptions may occur. The continuously varying loads connected to the
network cause voltage variations. The test shall be performed with the EUT connected to the test generator with the shortest
power supply cable as specified by the EUT manufacturer.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Storage Capacitor NWEMC 30uF CPF NCR 0 mo
Variable Transformer General Electric N/A XFT NCR 0 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
of Duration Phase Angle Performance Observation
Reduction
Events Criteria
3 100% 0.5 Cycles (50Hz) 0° 1 No Phenomena Observed
3 30% 25 Cycles (50Hz) 0° 1 No Phenomena Observed
1 100% 250 Cycles (50Hz) 0° 3 PC shut down and restarted but required user
intervention to return to Win EMI
CONCLUSION
The EUT exhibited a change in performance when operating as specified by the
manufacturer; intervention was required to recover.
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
Reduction
Events Criteria
CONCLUSION
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
Reduction
Events Criteria
CONCLUSION
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST DESCRIPTION
Using the mode of operation and configuration noted within this report, a Voltage interruption and dip Immunity test was
performed. The standard applies to electrical and electronic equipment having a rated input current not exceeding 16 A per
phase. It does not apply to electrical and electronic equipment for connection to D.C. networks or 400 Hz A.C. networks.
Electrical and electronic equipment may be affected by voltage dips, short interruptions or voltage variations of power supply.
Voltage dips and short interruptions are caused by faults in the network, in installations or by a sudden large change of load.
In certain cases, two or more consecutive dips or interruptions may occur. The continuously varying loads connected to the
network cause voltage variations. The test shall be performed with the EUT connected to the test generator with the shortest
power supply cable as specified by the EUT manufacturer.
TEST EQUIPMENT
Storage Capacitor NWEMC 30uF CPF NCR 0 mo
Variable Transformer General Electric N/A XFT NCR 0 mo
WEST2560-1
MODES INVESTIGATED
Win EMI

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
Reduction
Events Criteria
CONCLUSION
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
Reduction
Events Criteria
CONCLUSION
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS
TEST SPECIFICATIONS
EN 55024:2010 IEC 61000-4-11:2004
COMMENTS
EUT OPERATING MODES

Win EMI

None

OBSERVATIONS
Number NWEMC
Percentage
Reduction
Events Criteria
CONCLUSION
Tested By

VOLTAGE DIPS &
WTD.2013.07.23
INTERRUPTIONS

CE World Report 800006 WEST2560

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CE World Report 800006 WEST2560

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CE World Report 800006 WEST2560

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Western Digital

Report Prepared By Northwest EMC Inc.

NORTHWEST EMC – (888) 364-2378 – www.nwemc.com

California – Minnesota – Oregon – New York – Washington

Last Date of Test: June 19, 2014

Deviations From Test Standards

Victor Ratinoff, Operations Manager

Report No. WEST2560 2/140

Report No. WEST2560 3/140

Report No. WEST2560 4/140

Frequency Range Peak Data Quasi-Peak Data Average Data

Adjusted Measured Transducer Cable External

Report No. WEST2560 5/140

Report No. WEST2560 6/140

Oregon California New York Minnesota Washington

Report No. WEST2560 7/140

Client and Equipment Under Test (EUT) Information

Information Provided by the Party Requesting the Test

Functional Description of the EUT (Equipment Under Test):

Additional Drives Tested:

Highest frequency generated or used in the device:

Report No. WEST2560 8/140

Report No. WEST2560 9/140

Report No. WEST2560 10/140

Report No. WEST2560 11/140

Report No. WEST2560 12/140

Report No. WEST2560 13/140

Report No. WEST2560 14/140

Report No. WEST2560 15/140

Peripherals in test setup boundary

Report No. WEST2560 16/140

Peripherals in test setup boundary

Report No. WEST2560 17/140

Item Date Test Modification Note Disposition of EUT

Report No. WEST2560 18/140

FREQUENCY RANGE INVESTIGATED

Report No. WEST2560 19/140

EUT: R/N: 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

EUT OPERATING MODES

DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD

Report No. WEST2560 20/140

Report No. WEST2560 21/140

EUT: R/N: 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

EUT OPERATING MODES

DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD

Report No. WEST2560 22/140

Report No. WEST2560 23/140

EUT: R/N: 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

EUT OPERATING MODES

DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD

Report No. WEST2560 24/140

Report No. WEST2560 25/140

EUT: R/N: 800006 Work Order: WEST2560

EUT OPERATING MODES

DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD

Report No. WEST2560 26/140

Report No. WEST2560 27/140

Report No. WEST2560 28/140

Report No. WEST2560 29/140

FREQUENCY RANGE INVESTIGATED