Module 1: Sources and Criticism in History
Module 1: Sources and Criticism in History
Module 1: Sources and Criticism in History
CRITICISM IN HISTORY
Introduction
1|Page
HISTORY: ITS MEANING, RELEVANCE AND
SOURCES
B. Objective
• Identify credible and authentic primary sources and know how to evaluate their
provenance.
C. Pre-Test
True or False: Write true if the statement is factual and false if it is otherwise on the space
provided for.
2|Page
D. Key Concept
HISTORY
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
SOURCES OF HISTORY
Colonial records such as government reports and legal documents form a significant
part of our collection of documents here and abroad, particularly in Spain and the United States. In
the 20th century and up to now, memoirs of personal accounts written by important historical
personages constitute another type of documents. Philippine presidents such as Emilio Aguinaldo,
Manuel Quezon, and Diosdado Macapagal wrote their memoirs to highlight their roles as nation-
builders.
b. archaeological records – preserved remains of human beings, their activities and their
environment
c. oral and video accounts – audio-visual documentation of people, events and places
These are usually recorded in video and audio cassettes, and compact discs. Aside from
scholars, media people also use oral and video accounts as part of their news and public affairs
work.
b. Secondary - materials made by people long after the events being described had
taken place
- The testimony of anyone who is not an eyewitness – that is, of one who was not present at the
events of which he tells
A primary source must thus have been produced by a contemporary of the events it narrates. It
does not, however, need to be original in the legal sense of the word original – that is, the very
document (usually the first written draft) whose contents are the subject of discussion – for quite
often a later copy or a printed edition will do just as well; and in the case of the Greek and Roman
classics seldom are any but later copies available. Primary sources need not be original in either of
these two ways. They need to be “original” only in the sense of underived or first-hand as to their
testimony. This point ought to be emphasized in order to avoid confusion between original sources
and primary sources. The confusion arises from a particularly careless use of the word original. It
is often used by historians as a synonym for manuscript or archival. If the key function of primary
source documents is to give facts, secondary source documents, on the other hand, provide valuable
interpretations of historical events.
5|Page
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
External Criticism
– answers concern and questions
pertinent to the authenticity of a historical
source by identifying who composed the
historical material, locating when and where
the historical material was produced, and
establishing the material’s evidential value.
https://sirdezmodules.blogspot.com
Internal Criticism
- deals with the credibility and
reliability of the content of a given
historical source. It focuses on
understanding the substances and
message that the historical material
wants to convey by examining how
the author framed the intent and
meaning of a composed material.
https://sirdezmodules.blogspot.com
Sources:
Modified CHED Second Generation GE Faculty Training Materials
www.google.com
https://sirdezmodules.blogspot.com
stock.adobe.com
www.flaticon.com
www.bing.com
6|Page
E. Activities and Assessment
F. Reflection
7|Page
G. Post - Test
True or False: Write true if the statement is factual and false if it is otherwise on the
space provided for.
1. History deals with the past.
2. A relic is an example of a primary historical source.
3. Oral account is considered a reliable source of historical data.
4. History has two major sources primary and secondary.
5. Only primary sources maybe used in writing history.
6. Secondary sources could be derived from primary sources.
7. Validating the authenticity of historical sources is known as external criticism.
8. Historiography is the study of history.
9. A historical fact need not to be proven.
10.Secondary sources provide interpretations of historical events.
8|Page