The document discusses the definition of history according to Zeus A. Salazar. History is defined as the account of the past that has meaning, significance, and importance to one's own society and culture. It further implies that history should be reported using the concepts and categories of one's own culture. Writing history from an outsider's perspective could lead to issues as they may not fully understand the culture or have access to local sources, while an insider could provide more accurate and nuanced information but may lack objectivity.
The document discusses the definition of history according to Zeus A. Salazar. History is defined as the account of the past that has meaning, significance, and importance to one's own society and culture. It further implies that history should be reported using the concepts and categories of one's own culture. Writing history from an outsider's perspective could lead to issues as they may not fully understand the culture or have access to local sources, while an insider could provide more accurate and nuanced information but may lack objectivity.
The document discusses the definition of history according to Zeus A. Salazar. History is defined as the account of the past that has meaning, significance, and importance to one's own society and culture. It further implies that history should be reported using the concepts and categories of one's own culture. Writing history from an outsider's perspective could lead to issues as they may not fully understand the culture or have access to local sources, while an insider could provide more accurate and nuanced information but may lack objectivity.
The document discusses the definition of history according to Zeus A. Salazar. History is defined as the account of the past that has meaning, significance, and importance to one's own society and culture. It further implies that history should be reported using the concepts and categories of one's own culture. Writing history from an outsider's perspective could lead to issues as they may not fully understand the culture or have access to local sources, while an insider could provide more accurate and nuanced information but may lack objectivity.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
SELF ASSESSMENT 1
Below is a definition of history by Zeus A. Salazar (1999). Examine it
carefully then answer the questions following the definition.
“Ang KASAYSAYAN ay SALAYSAY hinggil sa nakaraan o
nakalipas na may SAYSAY – kahulugan, katuturan, at kabuluhan – sa SARILING LIPUNAN at KULTURA o kabuuang kinabibilangan. Ito ay iniuulat gamit ang mga konsepto at kategorya ng sariling kultura.”
A. What does the author mean or imply by “Ang kasaysayan ay salaysay…
na may saysay sa sariling lipunan at kultura”? The author wants to indicate that the history is all about past events that have deep meaning and importance to our society. It is important for us to know our history because through the history it can bring us to our past, it always reminds us the past events that has deep impact in our society that help to change the world. The history has special meaning to our lives, it connects us through it. What we have no and what we predict on the future of our society has an involvement to our past.
B. The statement. “Ito (referring to kasaysayan) ay iniuulat gamit ang
mga konsepto at kategorya ng sariling kultura implies who should write a people’s history. What issues would emerge from (1) a history of people written and interpreted by an “outsider” (a foreign Historian); and, (2) a history of people analyzed and presented by an “insider” (a local historian)?
B.1 History written by an outsider
In my point of view, history written by an outsider can be
contradicted by history written by an insider. Not all information are inappropriate because the history wrote by an outsider isn’t permanent so it means that the history written by insider is not that accurate. In conclusion, foreigner or an outsider who write history to a foreign country can receive a negative feedback from the locals. B.2 History written by an insider
The history written by an insider is obviously can give more
appropriate information about history because it is written by an insider, it means the he/she is knowledgeable about their own country and can find more reliable source to write history by his/her own hands and knowledge. But on the other side I can say that history written by an insider have also disadvantages because we can think that he/she can write by his/her own with false claims, and can’t provide evidences