C180-E059C - Small-Shimadzu Analysis Guide Book
C180-E059C - Small-Shimadzu Analysis Guide Book
C180-E059C - Small-Shimadzu Analysis Guide Book
Cd
Pb 9DULHW\,GHQWLILFDWLRQ*HQHWLF
Ca 5. Inorganic Metals $QDO\VLV,UUDGLDWHG)RRG
5. 1 Measurement of Lead in Sugar (1) - AA .....................................................105
,GHQWLILFDWLRQRI5LFH9DULHWLHVí0&( ...................................................152
Measurement of Lead in Sugar (2) - AA .....................................................106
,GHQWLILFDWLRQRI5LFH9DULHWLHVí0&( ...................................................153
5. 2 Measurement of Minerals in Dietary Supplements (1) - AA........................107
,GHQWLILFDWLRQRI7KXQQXVí0&( ...........................................................154
Measurement of Minerals in Dietary Supplements (2) - AA........................108
,GHQWLILFDWLRQRI7KXQQXVí0&( ...........................................................155
5. 3 Measurement of Cadmium and Lead in Food Additives (1) - AA................109
9. 3 Spectroscopic Measurement and Multivariate Analysis for Classification of
Measurement of Cadmium and Lead in Food Additives (2) - AA................110 %HHU7\SHVí89 ...................................................................................156
5. 4 Measurement of Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb) in Pet Food (1) - AA .................... 111 Spectroscopic Measurement and Multivariate Analysis for Classification of
Measurement of Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb) in Pet Food (2) - AA ....................112 %HHU7\SHVí89 ...................................................................................157
5. 5 Measurement of Cadmium in Brown Rice (1) - AA .....................................113 9. 3 Spectroscopic Measurement and Multivariate Analysis for Classification of
Measurement of Cadmium in Brown Rice (2) - AA .....................................114 %HHU7\SHVí89 ...................................................................................158
'HWHFWLRQRI$OOHUJHQLF6XEVWDQFHVí0&( ..........................................159
'HWHFWLRQRI$OOHUJHQLF6XEVWDQFHVí0&( ..........................................160
'HWHFWLRQRI)RRG3RLVRQLQJ5HODWHG*HQHVí0&(............................161
7R[LQ,QRUJDQLF3RLVRQ 'HWHFWLRQRI)RRG3RLVRQLQJ5HODWHG*HQHVí0&(............................162
4XDOLWDWLYH$QDO\VLVRI*HQHWLFDOO\0RGLILHG&RUQí0&(.....................163
6. 1 Analysis of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poison (DSP) (1) - LC/MS .........................115
4XDOLWDWLYH$QDO\VLVRI*HQHWLFDOO\0RGLILHG&RUQí0&(.....................164
Analysis of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poison (DSP) (2) - LC/MS .........................116
'HWHFWLRQRI0ROGDQG<HDVW*HQHVí0&(..........................................165
6. 2 High Speed Analysis of Aflatoxins in Food (1) - LC ....................................117
'HWHFWLRQRI0ROGDQG<HDVW*HQHVí0&(..........................................166
High Speed Analysis of Aflatoxins in Food (2) - LC ....................................118
'HWHFWLRQRI,UUDGLDWHG)RRGVí*&06 ...............................................167
6. 3 Analysis of Aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 at High Sensitivity (1) - LC .............119
'HWHFWLRQRI,UUDGLDWHG)RRGVí*&06 ...............................................168
Analysis of Aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 at High Sensitivity (2) - LC .............120
Analysis of Aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 at High Sensitivity (3) - LC .............121
6. 4 High Speed Analysis of Nivalenol and Deoxynivalenol (1) - LC .................122
High Speed Analysis of Nivalenol and Deoxynivalenol (2) - LC .................123
6. 5 Analysis of Arsenic in Foods (1) - EDX ......................................................124
10. )RRG&RQWDLQHUV3DFNLQJ0DWHULDOV
Analysis of Arsenic in Foods (2) - EDX ......................................................125 /HDFK7HVWIRU3KHQROLQ5XEEHU1LSSOHVí89.....................................169
/HDFK7HVWIRU3KHQROLQ5XEEHU1LSSOHVí89.....................................170
$QDO\VLVRI(SLFKORURK\GULQ'LVVROYHGIURP0HWDO)RRG&DQVí*&..........171
10.3 $QDO\VLVRI7ULHWK\ODPLQHDQG7ULEXW\ODPLQHLQ3RO\FDUERQDWH3ODVWLFVí*& ...172
7. )RUHLJQ0DWWHUV2IIHQVLYH2GRUV $QDO\VLVRI7ULHWK\ODPLQHDQG7ULEXW\ODPLQHLQ3RO\FDUERQDWH3ODVWLFVí*& ...173
7. 1 High Sensitivity Analysis of 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole in Wine (1) - GC/MS/MS ...126 10.4 $QDO\VLVRI9LQ\OLGHQH&KORULGHLQ3RO\YLQ\OLGHQH&KORULGH3ODVWLFVí*& ...174
High Sensitivity Analysis of 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole in Wine (2) - GC/MS/MS ...127 $QDO\VLVRI9LQ\O&KORULGHLQ3RO\YLQ\O&KORULGH3ODVWLFVí*&...................175
7. 2 Rapid Determination of Melamine in Food (1) - LC ....................................128 10.6 $QDO\VLVRI0HWK\O0HWKDFU\ODWHLQ3RO\PHWK\O0HWKDFU\ODWH3ODVWLFVí*& ...176
Rapid Determination of Melamine in Food (2) - LC ....................................129 $QDO\VLVRI+HDY\(OHPHQWVLQ7DEOHZDUHí,&3$(6 ..........................177
7. 3 Analysis of Contaminant Adhering to Frozen Pizza (1) $QDO\VLVRI+HDY\(OHPHQWVLQ7DEOHZDUHí,&3$(6 ..........................178
- FTIR/EDX/EPMA......................................................................................130 $QDO\VLVRI+HDY\(OHPHQWVLQD&XSí('; .............................................179
Analysis of Contaminant Adhering to Frozen Pizza (2) ;5D\&72EVHUYDWLRQRI6HDOVRI)RRG3URGXFW3DFNDJLQJí1', .....180
- FTIR/EDX/EPMA......................................................................................131 ;5D\&72EVHUYDWLRQRI6HDOVRI)RRG3URGXFW3DFNDJLQJí1', .....181
7. 4 Introduction of a Search System for Contaminants in Tap Water (1) ;5D\&72EVHUYDWLRQRI6HDOVRI)RRG3URGXFW3DFNDJLQJí1', .....182
- FTIR/EDX .................................................................................................132
Introduction of a Search System for Contaminants in Tap Water (2)
- FTIR/EDX .................................................................................................133
7. 5 Identification of Contaminants (Animal Hair) (1) - MCE..............................134
Identification of Contaminants (Animal Hair) (2) - MCE..............................135
7. 6 Analysis of Odor in Frozen Shrimp (1) - GC/MS ........................................136
Analysis of Odor in Frozen Shrimp (2) - GC/MS ........................................137
8. Food Properties
8. 1 Melting of Chocolate - TA ...........................................................................138
8. 2 Gelatinization of Starch - TA .......................................................................139
8. 3 DSC Measurement of Liquor - TA...............................................................140
8. 4 DSC Measurement of Fish Meat - TA.........................................................141
8. 5 Protein Denaturation and Texture Analysis for Chicken (1) - TA.................142
Protein Denaturation and Texture Analysis for Chicken (2) - TM................143
8. 6 Texture Analysis of "Soumen" Japanese Vermicelli (1) - TM ......................144
Texture Analysis of "Soumen" Japanese Vermicelli (2) - TM ......................145
8. 7 Measurement of Texture Characteristics of Rice - TM ...............................146
8. 8 Measurement of Texture of Pork - TM ........................................................147
8. 9 Texture Evaluation of Care Food (1) - TM ..................................................148
Texture Evaluation of Care Food (2) - TM ..................................................149
8.10 Particle Size Distribution Measurement of Chocolate (1) - PT ...................150
Particle Size Distribution Measurement of Chocolate (2) - PT ...................151
C
H O
1. Food Product Components
1.1 Analysis of Fatty Acids in Fish (1) - GC/MS/MS
Q Explanation
While some fatty acids, such as the n-3 fatty acids EPA 200 mg of Pulverized Edible Flesh
and DHA, are beneficial to human health because they
2 mL of extraction liquid added
lower the amount of blood-borne neutral fat, too much
Agitated and then centrifuged
intake of saturated fatty acids raises the risk of some
diseases. For this reason, there is a need for the batch 500 μL of Extracted Liquid
analysis of these fatty acids in the life sciences and food
Dried with nitrogen gas
engineering sectors. Despite requiring methylation, GC-
MS has gained attention because of its suitability for Dried Residue
multicomponent batch analyses. In fatty acid analyses
500 μL each of reagents A and B added
utilizing GC-MS, the EI (electron ionization) method
Left standing 1 hour at 37 $C
is used for ionization. With the EI method, there are
500 μL of reagent C added
many types of fragment ions, making it easy to select
Left standing 20 minutes at 37 $C
an m/z to enable separation by mass from impurities.
2 mL of extraction liquid added
However, because of the large number of fragment ions,
Centrifuged
the sensitivity of the individual ions is reduced, making
it difficult to detect trace quantities of fatty acids. In Organic Phase
contrast, with the PCI (positive chemical ionization)
1 mL deionized water
method, protonated molecular ions can be detected, from
Agitated and then centrifuged
which molecular weight data can be obtained. Since
there is only a small number of fragment ion types, the Organic Phase
sensitivity is increased. This means, however, that the
ion types that can be selected for monitoring are limited
and there may not be any ions that can be separated by GC/MS and GC/MS/MS Measurements
mass from impurities. Here we introduce the results of an
investigation of separation from impurities based on the
EISIM, PCI-SIM, EI-MRM, and PCI-MRM methods. Fig. 1.1.1 Pretreatment of Saury
1
1.1 Analysis of Fatty Acids in Fish (2) - GC/MS/MS
QAnalytical Conditions
Instrument : GCMS-TQ8030
Column : SP-2560
/HQJWKPPP,'GI ƫP [MS]
Glass Insert : 6SOLWOHVVLQVHUWZLWKZRRO31 Interface Temp. : 250 °C
[GC] Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Measurement Mode :
Column Temp. : &PLQ-&PLQ-&PLQ GC/MS : SIM
Injection Mode : Split GC/MS/MS : MRM
Split Ratio : 1:10 Ionization Method : EI and PCI methods
Carrier Gas Control : /LQHDUYHORFLW\FPVHF PCI Reagent Gas : Isobutane
Injection Volume : ƫ/ PCI Reagent Gas Pressure: 70 kPa
Methyl linolenate;(Z)18:3n-3
EI-SIM EI-MRM PCI-SIM PCI-MRM
(×1,000,000) (×10,000) (×1,000,000) (×100,000)
7.0 1.25
2.0 292.20 292.30>135.10 293.20
236.00 293.30>261.30
6.0 236.20>175.10 1.00 293.30>243.20
1.00
1.5 5.0
0.75
4.0 0.75
1.0 3.0 0.50
0.50
2.0
0.5 0.25 0.25
1.0
51.75 52.00 52.25 52.50 51.75 52.00 52.25 52.50 52.75 53.00 53.25 53.50 53.00 53.25 53.50
54.50 54.75 55.00 55.25 54.50 54.75 55.00 55.25 55.75 56.00 56.25 56.50 55.75 56.00 56.25 56.50
Fig. 1.1.2 Mass Chromatograms for Methyl linolenate;(Z)18:3n-3 and Methyl cis-11,14,17-Icosatrienoate;(Z)20:3n-3
Contained in an Extract of Saury Measured in Individual Analysis Modes
We analyzed fatty acids in sh to investigate mass separation from impurities and sensitivity for the EI-SIM, EI-MRM,
PCI-SIM, and PCI-MRM analysis modes. The results revealed that the PCI method is the most sensitive, and for unsaturated
fatty acids in particular, provides more sensitive detection than the EI method. Also, PCI-MRM was found to be the most
ideal for mass separation from impurities, making peak identi cation easy. It is thus evident that the PCI-MRM method is
effective for multicomponent batch analyses of fatty acids.
2
C Food Product Components
H O
Q Explanation
Fig. 1.2.1 shows the results from GC GC-MS analysis of methyl esteri ed lipids extracted from commercial butter
by the Folch method. It con rms the main components, palmitic acid (C16) and oleic acid (C18 1ω6), as big blobs (see
Fig 1.2.1). C18 fatty acids include a variety of components and isomers, but these can be separated into their respective
components for highly accurate qualitative and quantitative results by using a second column with high polarity.
QAnalytical Conditions
GC × GC Modulator : ZX1-GC × GC Modulator
GC-MS : GCMS-QP2010 Ultra
[GC × GC] [MS]
Column : VW'%P/ðPP,'ƫP Interface Temp. : 240 °C
QG5W[:$;P/ðPP,'ƫP Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
Injection Volume : ƫ/ Solvent Elution Time : 15.5 min
Injection Mode : 6SOLWVSOLWUDWLR Data Sampling Time : 16 min to 80 min
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Measurement Mode : Scan
Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ&&min Mass Range : m/z 45-330
&PLQ Event Time : 0.02 sec
Control Mode : &RQVWDQWSUHVVXUHN3D
Modulation Time : 8 sec
Hot Pulse Time : VHF&
Gamma linolenic
acid
Linoleic acid
Elaidic acid
Palmitic acid
Oleic acid
Stearic acid
3
1.3 Quantitative Analysis of Trans Fatty Acid by FTIR (1) - FTIR
Q Explanation
Trans fatty acids are a kind of fat that is found in foods.
Excessive ingestion of this type of fat is associated
with elevated LDL cholesterol (low density lipoprotein
cholesterol) levels, which increases the risk of heart
disease1). In Japan, there is currently, no obligation to
display trans fatty acid content on food labels, nor is
there a specified content limit in Japan. However, food
entrepreneurs have been taking measures for some time
by independently developing low trans fatty acid foods
and selling them on the market. On the other hand, nations
Fig. 1.3.1 PIKE MIRacle A ATR Accessory with Optional
such as the United States and Denmark are obligated to Heated Crystal Plate
display the trans fatty acid content on food labels and to
adhere to content restrictions on trans fatty acids. Here we
introduce a quantitative analysis study we conducted for Cis Unsaturated Fatty Acid Trans Unsaturated Fatty Acid
trans fatty acids by the ATR and transmission methods. H2
H
C
QMeasurement of Trans Fatty Acid by Single C C
H2 H H2
5HÀHFWLRQ$756SHFWURVFRS\ H2
C C C C
C H
According to the AOCS method, analysis of trans C C C
fatty acid content by FTIR is to be conducted by the C
transmission method 2) and the ATR 3) method. Here we H2 C H2 H H2
4
C Food Product Components
H O
Abs Abs
Trielaidin 10.0 % content 2 Trielaidin (non-spiked)
Trielaidin (10.0% spiked)
1.5
0.5
1000 990 980 970 960 950 940 930 1/cm 4000 3000 2000 1500 1000 750 500 1/cm
Fig. 1.3.4 Trans Fatty Acid Peak Region Selected for Calibration Curve Fig. 1.3.6 Infrared Spectra of Unspiked Olive Oil and Olive Oil
Spiked with Trielaidin
Trielaidin (non-spiked)
5
1.4 Analysis of 3-MCPD Fatty Acid Diesters in Palm Oil (1) - LC/MS/MS
O
O
Exact Mass: 586.47 B O
O
O
Exact Mass: 638.50
Mol. Wt.: 587.36 Mol. Wt.: 639.43
Cl Cl
Inten.(×100,000) Inten.(×100,000)
40 V 331 40 V 357
5.0 5.0
57
85 6995
0.0 0.0
100 200 300 400 500 600 m/z 100 200 300 400 500 600 m/z
Fig. 1.4.1 MS/MS Spectra of the Synthetic Samples (A: 3-MCPD-Dipalmitoyl Ester, B: 3-MCPD-Dioleoyl Ester)
604.40>331.10(+) 30 656.50>357.20(+)
40
5.985
6.083
35 A 25 B
30
20
25
15
20
15 10
10
5
5
0 0
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 min 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 min
Fig. 1.4.2 MRM Chromatograms of the Synthetic Samples (1 μg/L, A: 3-MCPD-Dipalmitoyl Ester, B: 3-MCPD-Dioleoyl Ester)
6
C Food Product Components
H O
1.4 Analysis of 3-MCPD Fatty Acid Diesters in Palm Oil (2) - LC/MS/MS
Area Area
125000
175000 A B
150000 100000
125000
75000
100000
75000 50000
50000
25000
25000
R2=0.9992873 R2=0.9998887
0 0
0 250 500 750 0 250 500 750
Concentration Concentration
175
300
150
250
125
200
100
150 75
100 50
50 25
0 0
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 min 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 min
Fig. 1.4.4 MRM Chromatograms of 3-MCPD Fatty Acid Diesters in Palm Oil (A:3-MCPD-Dipalmitoyl Ester, B:3-MCPD-Dioleoyl Ester)
7
1.5 4XDQWLWDWLYH$QDO\VLVRI)DWLQ0LONE\899LV1,55HÀHFWDQFH
Spectroscopy and Multivariate Analysis (1) - UV
Q Explanation Integrating
sphere
Milk is one of the most popular drinks among humans.
In recent years, however, there has been a great increase
in the sales of milk products with adjusted fat content.
Milk fat content is typically measured using the Roese-
Gottlieb or the Gerber method, but measurement by
these methods is ext remely time-consuming. We Securing jig
therefore investigated the use of the spectral re ectance
method as a simpler quantitative method. By applying a
combination of re ectance measurement using a screw-
top glass tube in conjunction with multivariate analysis, Fig. 1.5.1 Sample Set in Integrating Sphere
we found that the fat content could be determined quite
easily. As multivariate analysis methods, the multiple
R%
linear regression method, PLS method, and support 80.0
Q7RWDO/XPLQRXV5HÀHFWDQFH0HDVXUHPHQWRI0LON 0.0
900.0 1500.0 2000.0 2300.0
Nine types of measurement samples with differing nm
levels of fat content (3 types of high-fat milk, 3 types of Fig. 1.5.2 Total Luminous Re ection Spectra of Samples
medium-fat milk, 3 types of low-fat milk) were used. The Red: High-Fat Milk, Black: Medium-Fat Milk, Blue:
fat content values displayed on the various milk cartons Low-Fat Milk
are shown in Table 1.5.1. To ensure that all of the samples
were positioned identically, measurement was conducted Table 1.5.1 Measurements of 9 Types of Milk Samples
with the integrating sphere mounted in a securing jig.
Sample Fat Content as Listed on Milk Carton (g/200 mL)
Each sample was transferred to a screw-top glass tube High-fat 1 9.3
which was then set in the integrating sphere as shown in High-fat 2 9.4
Fig. 1.5.1, and the total light reflectance was measured High-fat 3 9.5
twice for each sample by transferring the same sample to Medium-fat 1 7.6
Medium-fat 2 7.8
a different screw-top glass tube. Thus, a total of 18 data Medium-fat 3 7.6
points were obtained (9 × 2 = 18). The disposable screw- Low-fat 1 0.2
top glass tubes were discarded after each use. In addition, Low-fat 2 1.0
a Spectralon® re ectance standard (U. S. Labsphere, Inc.) Low-fat 3 2.0
was used for the re ectance measurements.
The measurement results are shown in Fig. 1.5.2. In QAnalytical Conditions
Fig. 1.5.2, the redcolored trace lines correspond to high- Instrument : UV-3600 UV-visible-near-infrared
fat milk, the black trace lines to medium-fat milk, and the spectrophotometer
blue trace lines to low-fat milk. The data clearly indicate MPC-3100 Large sample compartment
that the lower the fat content, the lower the reflectance ZLWKEXLOWLQLQWHJUDWLQJVSKHUH
becomes overall. An enlarged view of a portion of Measurement : 900 nm – 2300 nm
Fig. 1.5.2 is shown in Fig. 1.5.3. Looking at the blue-trace Wavelength Range
spectra of the low-fat milk, each of the two respective Scan Speed : Medium
repeat measurement results overlap nearly perfectly, Sampling Pitch : 1.0 nm
suggesting that exchanging the screw-top glass tube has Photometric Value : 5HÁHFWDQFH
little effect. The blue line spectra are clearly divided into Slit Width : QP
3 groups, corresponding to the descending order of fat
content from 2.0, 1.0 and 0.2 (g/200 mL).
8
C Food Product Components
H O
1.5 4XDQWLWDWLYH$QDO\VLVRI)DWLQ0LONE\899LV1,55HÀHFWDQFH
Spectroscopy and Multivariate Analysis (2) - UV
QResults of Quantitative Analysis R%
70.0
The multiple linear regression method of multivariate analysis,
the PLS method, and support vector regression method (SVR) Fat content 2.0 (g/200 mL)
60.0
were applied to the acquired data to quantify the fat content.
The rst and second samples of the high-fat, medium-fat, and Fat content 1.0 (g/200 mL)
Fat Content Listed on Milk Predicted Results by Multiple Predicted Results by PLS Predicted Results by Support
Sample
Carton (g/200 mL) Linear Regression Method Method Vector Regression Method
9
1.6 Analysis of Orotic Acid in Yogurt - LC
15
10
20.0
15
15.0 1
10
10.0
5.0 5
0.0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 min 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 min
Fig. 1.6.2 Chromatogram of Standard Solution of Orotic Acid Fig. 1.6.4 Chromatogram of Yogurt Drink (10 μL injected)
(10 mg/L, 10 μL injected)
10
C Food Product Components
H O
mAU 0.0
1
2 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 min
8
7 4
Fig. 1.7.3 Soft Drink B (20 × dilution, 4 μL injected)
6
*Cautions Regarding This Analysis
5 Sample injection
3 Since a buffered solution is used as the mobile phase, the sample
4
solvent and injection volume may affect the results. For example, if
3 a large volume of an alcoholic drink is injected, peak distortion may
occur.
2
Detection selectivity
1 Since detection is conducted at UV 210 nm, the results are easily
affected by impurities. Analysis may be dif cult if large quantities of
0
impurities are present in the sample.
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 min Column washing
If 100 % buffer solution is used as the mobile phase, elution of the
■ Peaks organic acids may gradually occur earlier. In this situation, conduct
1. Formic acid, 2. Malonic acid
3. Acetic acid, 4. Citric acid
column washing with mobile phase containing some amount of an
organic solvent (example: water/acetonitrile = 1/1). This washing
is also effective for removing hydrophobic constituents from the
Fig. 1.7.1 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of 4 Organic
sample.
Acids (100 mg/L each, 4 μL injected)
11
1.8 Analysis of Amino Acids Contained in Vegetable Juice (1) - GC/MS
Q Explanation
Amino acids contained in vegetable juice were treated with EZ: faast TM (Phenomenex, Inc.), which enables easy
pretreatment, and then analyzed with a GC-MS system. Two kinds of vegetable juice were treated with EZ: faast.
Norvaline was added as an internal standard. A GCMS-QP2010 Ultra (with high-power oven) was used for the
measurements. The analysis conditions were in conformity with the “Amino Acid Analysis Methods” in the “GC/MS
Metabolic Components Database.”
QAnalytical Conditions
Instrument : *&06438OWUDZLWKKLJKSRZHURYHQ
Column : =%$$$OHQJWKPPP,'3KHQRPHQH[,QF
[GC] [MS]
Injection Volume : ƫ/ Interface Temp. : 280 °C
Injection Temp. : 280 °C Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
Column Temp. : &&PLQ& Solvent Elution Time : 0.4 min
Control Mode : &RQVWDQWSUHVVXUHN3D Data Sampling Time : 0.5 min to 7 min
Injection Mode : Split Measurement Mode : Scan
Split Ratio : 1:15 Mass Range : m/z XVHF
Carrier Gas : He Event Time : 0.15 sec
Fig. 1.8.1 Total Ion Current Chromatogram (TIC) for Amino Acid Derivatives in Vegetable Juice A
The numbers for each component follow the serial numbers in the “GC/MS Metabolic Components Database.”
12
C Food Product Components
H O
Fig. 1.8.2 Total Ion Current Chromatogram (TIC) for Amino Acid Derivatives in Vegetable Juice B
The numbers for each component follow the serial numbers in the “GC/MS Metabolic Components Database.”
QSummary
Pretreatment using the EZ: faast kit, following by analysis using the GCMS-QP2010 Ultra, which is equipped with a
high-speed scanning function, enabled rapid analysis of amino acids. With this combination, it took only 15 minutes per
sample from pretreatment to analysis.
13
1.9 High Speed Analysis of Pre-Column Derivatized Amino
Acids by SIL-30AC Auto-sampler (1) - LC
Q Explanation
Amino acid analysis is required in a wide range of Vial
elds, including foods and pharmaceuticals, and various
methods of derivatization have been devised to improve 0HUFDSWR3URSLRQLF$FLGѥ/
sensitivity and selectivity when conducting amino 23$ѥ/
acid analysis by HPLC. Here, using the RF-20Axs
6DPSOHѥ/
uorescence detector and the SIL-30AC autosampler with
its automated pretreatment functions, we introduce the Mix
analysis of amino acids using pre-column derivatization
with OPA and FMOC.
Wait 1.0 min
14
C Food Product Components
H O
mV
22
200
150
100
12 13 15
1 10 11
18 20
4 7 9 17 19
50 3 5
2 8
6 14 16 21
Peaks
1. Aspartic Acid 2. Glutamic Acid 3. Asparagine 4. Serine 5. Glutamine 6. Histidine 7. Glycine 8. Threonine 9. Citruline
10. Arginine 11. Alanine 12. GABA 13. Tyrosine 14. Cys-Cys 15. Valine 16. Methionine 17. Tryptophan 18. Phenylalanine
19. Isoleucine 20. Leucine 21. Lysine 22. Proline
15
1.10 High Speed Analysis of Pre-Column Derivatized Amino
Acids in Alcoholic Beverage (1) - LC
Q Explanation reagents used in this method and the pretreatment
In the previous section we introduced the analysis of program for the SIL-30AC, refer to the previous section.
amino acids that are obtained by hydrolysis primarily Fig. 1.10.1 shows the chromatogram obtained from
of proteins. Amino acids were prepared by automated analysis of a standard mixture of 26 amino acids in
precolumn derivatization using the SIL-30AC. solution.
However, for amino acid analysis applications which
require the search for functional constituents, etc. in QAnalytical Conditions
foods, monitoring of even more types of amino acids is Column : <0&7ULDUW&ƫP
becoming necessary. Here, we introduce an example of the (100 mm /ðPP,'ƫPPDQXIDFWXUHG
determination of 26 amino acids using a different column E\<0&&R/WG
size and different mobile phase conditions than were Mobile Phase : $PPRO/3RWXVVLXP3KRVSKDWH
used in the previous section. The automatic pretreatment %XIIHUS+
feature of the SIL-30AC was utilized for derivatization B : 45/40/15 Acetonitrile/Methanol/Water
of the amino acids during analysis, thereby enabling the Gradient Elution Method
overall analysis time to be substantially shortened. Time Program : %PLQAPLQ
APLQAPLQ
QSimultaneous Determination of 26 Amino Acids APLQAPLQ
The automatic pretreatment features of the Nexera APLQAPLQ
Flowrate : 0.4 mL/min
SI L -30AC autosampler were ut ilized to conduct
Column Temp. : 35 °C
automated derivatization of primary amino acids using Injection Volume: ƫ/
o-phthalaldehyde (hereafter, OPA) and secondary amino Detection : RF-20Axs, Ex. at 350 nm, Em. at 450 nm
acids, such as proline, etc., using 9-f luorenyl methyl A([DWQP(PDWQPPLQ
chloro formate (hereaf ter, FMOC), to produce uorescent Cell Temp. : 25 °C
substances within the autosampler. For the derivatization Flow Cell : Semi-micro cell
mv
13
14
300
15
250
12
11
200 1 9
26
150 16
5
3 10
100 2 18 20
4 19 23
78
21 22
50 6 24 25
17
0
Fig. 1.10.1 Chromatogram of Standard Mixture Solution of 26 Amino Acids (10 μmol/L Each)
16
C Food Product Components
H O
sample is injected into the column, and when the analysis starts, 洗浄 洗浄 洗浄 洗浄
description of the overlapping injection analysis cycle. Derivatization Derivatization Derivatization Derivatization
誘導体化 誘導体化 誘導体化 誘導体化
mV
100 13 23
1
12
14 (A)
15
75
10 11
50 7
2
18 20
25 3 8 16
4 5 6 17 19 22
9
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 min
mV
90
13
23
80 10 (B)
70 12 15
60
2
50 1
11
40
30 3 7
22
20 8 20
4 6 14 16
21
10 5 9 18 19
17
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 min
■ Peaks
1. Aspartic Acid 2. Glutamic Acid 3. Asparagine 4. Serine 5. Glutamine 6. Histidine 7. Glycine 8. Threonine 9. Citlulline 10. Arginine
11. ћ -Alanine 12. Alanine 13. GABA 14. Tyrosine 15. Valine 16. Methionine 17. Tryptophan 18. Phenylalanine 19. Isoleucine
20. Leucine 21. Ornithine 22. Lysine 23. Proline
Fig. 1.10.3 Chromatograms of Alcoholic Beverages: (A) Beer (B) White Wine
17
1.11 Ultra High-Sensitivity Analysis of Water-Soluble Vitamins - LC
mV
275 nm Current model
4500 SPD-M30A (High-sensitivity cell)
4000
S/N 7.0 times greater !
3500
6
3000
2500
4
2000 3
5
1500
1
1000 2
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 min
Peaks: :
1. Niacin
2. Nicotinamide
3. Pyridoxine
4. Riboflavinphosphate
phosphate
5. Thiamine
6. Riboflavin
18
C Food Product Components
H O
H H H H mV
OH Retinol 3.50
■ Peak
H H
1. Retinol palmitate
3.00
H H H H 2.50
O Retinol acetate
2.00
H H O 1
1.50
H H H H
Retinol palmitate
O 1.00
7
H H O
0.50
Fig. 1.12.1 Structures of Retinol, Retinol Acetate and Retinol Palmitate
0.00
mV 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 min
1.40 1 ■ Peaks
1. Retinol acetate (12 pg) Fig. 1.12.3 Chromatogram of Multivitamin Tablets (10 μL injected)
1.20 2. Retinol palmitate (11 pg)
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
2
0.20
0.00
19
1.13 Analysis of Water-Soluble Vitamins with Multi-Mode
ODS Column (1) - LC/MS
Q Explanation
Dietary guidelines and nutritional supplements are a significant Here we present an example of analysis of 8 water-soluble vitamins
concern to health conscious consumers. Upper and lower limits using a cation exchange-anion exchange multi-mode ODS column,
of daily intake of such functional foods have been speci ed for 12 (Scherzo SM-C18, Imtakt Corporation) in conjunction with the
vitamins and 2 minerals. Water-soluble vitamins are one class of LCMS2020 mass spectrometric detector. The gradient consisted
nutrients whose measurement is important to the food and nutritional of formic acid / ammonium formate buffer and acetonitrile mobile
supplement industries. Due to their high polarity, their retention phases, components typical for high sensitivity reverse-phase LC/MS
is extremely weak when using reversed-phase chromatography. analysis. Fig. 1.13.1 shows the chromatograms of the 8 water-soluble
Historic use of ion-pair reagents when conducting LC/MS analysis vitamins, Fig. 1.13.2 shows the mass spectra, and Fig. 1.13.3 shows the
of such weakly retained analytes has resulted in reduced sensitivity. respective calibration curves. The linearity in all cases was excellent,
with coef cient of repeatability values all greater than R 2 = 0.99.
QAnalytical Conditions
Column : Imtakt Scherzo SM-C18
(150 mm /ðPP,'ƫP
Mobile Phase : A: 5 mmol/L Ammonium Formate +
0.1 % Formic Acid-Water
B: Acetonitrile
Gradient Elution Method
Time Program : %PLQAPLQA
PLQ
Flowrate : 0.2 mL/min
Column Temp. : 40 °C
Injection Volume : 2ƫ/
Probe Voltage : N9(6,3RVLWLYH0RGH
N9(6,1HJDWLYH0RGH
Nebulizing Gas Flow: 1.5 L/min
Drying Gas Flow : 10 L/min
DL Temp. : 250 °C
Block Heater Temp. : 450 °C
Fig. 1.13.1 Chromatograms of 8 Water-Soluble Vitamins DL/Q-array Voltage : Using default values
20
C Food Product Components
H O
21
1.14 High Speed Analysis of Nucleobases, Nucleosides,
and Nucleotides (1) - LC
Q Explanation QAnalytical Conditions
Nucleic acids are biological macromolecules consisting of Column : .LQHWH[ƫP&c
linear chains of nucleotides, each of which is made up of PP/ðPP,'ƫP
a base, a sugar, and a phosphate group, and are important Mobile Phase : 200 mmol/L Sodium Perchlorate,
components that bear an organism’s genetic code. In PPRO/6RGLXP3KRVSKDWH%XIIHU
addition, nucleic acid-related compounds, including S+ DT
nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides have a variety Flowrate : 0.7 mL/min
of functions. Here, using the Nexera UHPLC (Ultra Column Temp. : 40 °C
High Performance Liquid Chromatography) System, and Injection Volume : ƫ/
the Shim-pack XR-ODS Ⅲ and Phenomenex Kinetex Detection : SPD-20AV at 260 nm
C18 high-speed, high-resolution columns, we introduce Flow Cell : Semi-micro cell
examples of ultra-high-speed analysis and ultra-high-
resolution analysis of nucleic acid-related compounds.
mAU
QAnalysis of Nucleobases and Nucleosides 40
4
We prepared a sample solution consisting of a standard
35
mixture of 10 nucleic acid-related substances, including 2
5 nucleobases (adenine, guanine, uracil, thymine, 30
cytosine) and 5 nucleosides (adenosine, guanosine, 1
uridine, thymidine, cytidine), each at a concentration of 25 3
10 mg/L, and conducted analysis using the Phenomenex 5
Kinetex C18 column (particle size 1.7 μm, 100 mm L. 20
7
× 2.1 mm I.D.). The Phenomenex Kinetex C18 is a 6
15 8
Core-shell column consisting of a 1.25-μm solid core
coated with a bonded 0.23 μm multilayer of porous lm. 10 9
Fig. 1.14.1 shows the chromatogram obtained using a 1 μL 10
injection of the prepared standard mixture. This analysis, 5
which took 30 minutes to complete using conventional
conditions, took about 1/10 as long (3 minutes) using these 0
■ Peaks
1. Cytosine, 2. Uracil, 3. Guanine, 4. Adenine, 5. Cytidine,
6. Uridine, 7. Thymine, 8. Adenosine, 9. Guanosine, 10. Thymidine
Note:
When using a 100 % aqueous mobile phase or a composition close to that, as indicated in the analytical conditions in this document the retention
times may become smaller by temporarily stopping solvent delivery, and then restarting. To prevent the occurrence of this phenomenon, after
completion of the analysis, it is recommended to replace the mobile phase with one containing an organic solvent (example: water/acetonitrile = 1/1)
before stopping solvent delivery. In addition, if the retention times gradually become faster, perform a rinse using the same mobile phase.
22
C Food Product Components
H O
23
1.15 Analysis of Oligosaccharides in Beer - LC
2500
■ Elution times
1. Glucose
2000
2. Maltose
3. Maltotriose
4. Maltoheptaose
1500
Gradient Elution
1000 1 2 3 4
500
Isocratic Elution
-500
12 3 4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
min
mV mV
1200 1200
1000 1000
800 800
600 600
400 400
200 200
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
min min
24
C Food Product Components
H O
ѥRIU ѥRIU
7.5
1 ■ Peaks ■ Peaks
30 1. Fructose 1. Fructose
2. Glucose 2 2. Glucose
2
25 3 3. Sucrose 3. Sucrose
4. Kestose 5.0 4. Kestose
5. Nystose 5. Nystose
20 6. Fructofuranosylnystose 6. Fructofuranosylnystose
4
4
15 5
5 2.5 3
10
6 1
5 6
0.0
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min
Fig. 1.16.2 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of Fructo- Fig. 1.16.3 Chromatogram of Oligosaccharide Syrup (10 μL injected)
oligosaccharides (5.0 g/L each, 10 μL injected)
25
1.17 Analysis of Saccharides Using Post-Column
Derivatization System (1) - LC
Q Explanation QAnalytical Conditions
The Shimadzu Prominence reducing sugar analysis <Separation>
system is a post-column derivatization system; after Column : Shim-pack ISA-07/S2504
separation of saccharides by the column, an arginine/ PP/ðPP,'
boric acid reagent solution is continuously added to the Guard Column : Shim-pack Guard Column ISA
column eluent to convert the saccharides to fluorescent PP/ðPP,'
derivatives for detection. This system allows detection Mobile Phase : A: 0.1 mol/L Potassium Borate Buffer (pH
of saccharides at high sensitivity and with excellent %PRO/3RWDVVLXP%RUDWH%XIIHUS+
selectivity, furthermore with the new Prominence RF- A ¤ B Linear Gradient Elution
20A XS , even higher sensitivity is achieved. Additionally, Flowrate : 0.6 mL/min
the temperature controlled f lowcell in the RF-20A XS Column Temp. : 65 °C
allows highly reliable analysis that is unaffected by Injection Volume : ƫ/
ambient temperature uctuations. Here we present some <Detection>
examples of analyzing saccharides using the reducing Reaction Reagent : 10 g/L Arginin, 30 g/L Boric Acid
sugar analysis system (anion exchange mode) with the Flowrate : 0.5 mL/min
Prominence RF-20A XS . Reaction Coil : SUS, 10 m L. × 0.8 mm I.D.
Reaction Temp.: Ý&
QAnalysis of Standard Solution Cooling Coil : SUS, 6 m L. × 0.3 mm I.D.
Detection : RF-20AXS Ex. at 320 nm, Em. at 430 nm
Fig. 1.17.1 shows a f low diagram of the Prominence
Cell Temp. : Ý&
reducing sugar analysis system, and Fig. 1.17.2 shows the
chromatogram of a standard solution of 11 saccharides.
mV
6
6
5
1 5 10
2
4
4
3 8
3 9
7
2 11
Fig. 1.17.1 Flow Diagram of the System Fig. 1.17.2 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of 11 Saccharides
(200 μmol/L each, except sucrose at 2 mmol/L, 10 μL injected)
26
C Food Product Components
H O
0.0
mV
Peak Height
Cell Temperature
QPeaks
6 Ý& Ý& Ý&Ý&
6 Same as Fig. 1.17.2 Ý&
Ý& Sucrose 4546 4043 88.9
27
1.18 Analysis of Ethyl Į -D-Glucoside in Japanese Sake - LC
Q Explanation mV
50
Ơ -D-glucoside (Ơ -EG). Ơ -EG is a highly polar compound, 0.0 5.0 10.0 min
OH 50
1
HO OC2H5
25
OH
0
QAnalytical Conditions mV
QPeaks
Column : Asahipak NH2P - 50 4E 1. Ethyl њ -D-Glucoside
2. Glucose
PP/ðPP,' 2
50
Mobile Phase : Water / Acetonitrile = 30/70
Flowrate : 0.8 mL/min
Column Temp. : 30 °C
25
Injection Volume : ƫ/
1
Detection : Refractive Index Detector
0
28
C Food Product Components
H O
Filtration 1
HPLC 10 ѥL Inj.
Q Peak
1. Alliin
0 10 20 30 min
1
Fig. 1.19.4 Analysis of Processed Garlic (tablet)
0 10 20 30 min
29
1.20 High Speed Analysis of Catechins in Green Tea (1) - LC
10. Epigallocatechin 3-(3”-O - 11. Epicatechin Gallate 12. Catechin Gallate (CG)
methyl) gallate (ECG)
(EGCG3”Me) OH
OH
OH
HO O
OH OH
HO O
OH
HO O
OH O
O OH OH
O
OH OH O
OH OH
O
O OH
OMe OH OH
OH OH
O
O
OH OH
OH OMe
O
O
OH OMe
OH OH
30
C Food Product Components
H O
100 4
100
6 6
2
2
(1)
11 11
5 10 14 (1) 10
5 14
0 0
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 min 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 min
Peaks Peaks
(1. GA), 2. GC, 3. EGC, 4. Caffeine, 5. C, 6. EC, 7. EGCG, 8. GCG, (1. GA), 2. GC, 3. EGC, 4. Caffeine, 5. C, 6. EC, 7. EGCG, (8. GCG),
(9. EGCG4”Me), (10. EGCG3”Me), 11. ECG, (12. CG), (13. ECG4”Me), 14. ECG3”Me (9. EGCG4”Me), 10. EGCG3”Me, 11. ECG, (12. CG), (13. ECG4”Me), 14. ECG3”Me
Fig. 1.20.3 Chromatogram of Green Tea A Fig. 1.20.4 Chromatogram of Green Tea B
31
1.21 High Speed Analysis of Resveratrol in Wine - LC
HO
H
Aqueous Organic Phase
trans - Resveratrol (lower)
HO H
OH
(upper)
H Evaporate to dryness
H
50 % Methanol 1 mL
OH cis - Resveratrol
Filtration (0.2 μm)
HO OH
32
C Food Product Components
H O
mAU
Shim-pack VP-ODS (250 mm L. = 4.6 mm I.D., 4.6 ѥm)
200 Injection Volume: 10 ѥL, UV Cell: Conventional cell
100
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 min
mAU
Shim-pack XR-ODSⅡ(100 mm L. × 3.0 mm I.D., 2.2 ѥm)
4
250
1
2
200
6
150 9
3 5
100
7 10
8 11
12
50
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 min
■ Peaks
1. Gallic acid, 2. Protocatechuic acid, 3. Chlorogenic acid, 4. p -Hydroxybenzoic acid, 5. Vanillic acid, 6. Caffeic acid, 7. Syringic acid
8. Salicylic acid, 9. p -Coumaric acid, 10. Ferulic acid, 11. Benzoic acid, 12. Sinapic acid
Fig. 1.22.1 Chromatograms of a Standard Mixture of 11 Phenolic Acids and Benzoic Acid (50 mg/L each)
33
1.22 High Speed Analysis of Phenolic Acids (2) - LC
400
HOOC OH
OH 300
O
Berry Juice
200
HO O OH
100 Filtration (0.2 +m)
OH
0
Fig. 1.22.2 Structure of Chlorogenic Acid 0.0 0.5 1.0 min HPLC
QAnalytical Conditions
mAU
Column : Shim-pack XR-ODS
PP/ðPP,'ƫP 60 1
7.5 Jam 1 g
O
1
O OH 5.0
Homogenization
Methanol 4 mL
HO OH 2.5
Ultrasonic Extraction
(30 min)
0.0
HO O
Filtration (0.2 +m)
O 0.0 0.5 1.0 min
mAU
QAnalytical Conditions 30
Column Temp. : 40 °C 0
34
C Food Product Components
H O
њ -Acids -25
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 min
Humulone R=CH2CH (CH3)2
Cohumulone R=CH (CH3)2
Adhumulone R=CH (CH3)CH2CH3 Fig. 1.23.2 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of Ơ -Acids and ơ -Acid
ћ -Acids
Lupulone R=CH2CH (CH3)2
Colupulone R=CH (CH3)2
35
1.23 High Speed Analysis of Į -Acids and ȕ -Acids in Hops (2) - LC
12.5 1
Evaporate
10.0
7.5
6 Methanol (HPLC grade) 25 mL
3
5.0
Filter
2.5
0.0
-2.5
HPLC 4 μL
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 min
[Reference]
1) Brewery Convention of Japan [Analysis Committee] Edition, Methods of Analysis of BCOJ (Revised edition), Brewing Society of Japan (2004)
36
C Food Product Components
H O
9
1
Q Peaks
O O 8 1. trans-Isocohumulone
trans-Iso-њ -Acids 2. trans-Isohumulone
R 7
H 3. trans-Isoadhumulone
trans-Isohumulone R=CH2CH(CH3)2 4. Cohumulone
HO 6 2
O OH trans-Isocohumulone R=CH(CH3)2 5. Humulone
5 6. Adhumulone
trans-Isoadhumulone R=CH(CH3)CH2CH3
4
3
O O
2 5
cis-Iso-њ -Acids
3 4
R 1
H cis-Isohumulone R=CH2CH(CH3)2
6
HO 0
O OH cis-Isocohumulone R=CH(CH3)2
cis-Isoadhumulone R=CH(CH3)CH2CH3 -1
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 min
HO O Cohumulone R=CH(CH3)2
HO
Adhumulone R=CH(CH3)CH2CH3
37
1.24 High Speed Analysis of Iso-Į-Acids and Į-Acids in Beer (2) - LC
QAnalysis of Beer
Fig. 1.24.3 shows the result of analysis of a commercial
beer. Sample preparation was conducted according to
the procedure1) shown in Fig. 1.24.4. Peaks a, b, and c in
the chromatogram are presumed 2) to be the cis isomers
of isocohumulone, isohumulone, and isoadhumulone,
respectively.
mAU
30.0
Sample 20 mL
Q Peaks
27.5
1. trans-Isocohumulone
a
2. trans-Isohumulone
25.0 Degas
3. trans-Isoadhumulone
22.5 4. Cohumulone
b 5. Humulone 10 mL
20.0 6. Adhumulone
6 mol/L Hydrochloric Acid 0.5 mL
17.5 a. cis-Isocohumulone
15.0 1
( b. cis-Isohumulone
c. cis-Isoadhumulone ) Shake (30 min)
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
(Spectrometry Grade) 20 mL
12.5
c
5.0
Organic Layer Aqueous Layer
3
2.5
4 5 6 12 mL
0.0
-2.5 Evaporate
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 min
Methanol (HPLC Grade) 1 mL
HPLC 4 μL
[References]
1) Brewery Convention of Japan [Analysis Committee] Edition, Revised BCOJ Beer Analysis Method, Brewing Society of Japan (2004)
2) B. Jaskula, K. Goiris1, G. De Rouck, G. Aerts, L. De Cooman : J. Inst. Brew., 113(4), 381-390 (2007)(see pdf)
38
C Food Product Components
H O
CH3
H3C CH3
CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3
Lycopene ћ -Carotene
Tomato 5 g
Chloroform 40 mL
Homogenize, 1 min. Standard
Tomato
Shake, 5 min.
mAU
100
1
mAU
100
75
1: Lycopene 80
2: ћ -Carotene
60
40
50
20
0
200 min
25 300 15
2 400 10
500 5
0 0
600
0 5 10 15 20 nm
min
39
1.26 Determination of Cyanidin-3-Glucoside in Black Soybeans - LC
O
mAU
OH
CH2OH 50
O
OH Standard
40
HO
OH Sample
30
Fig. 1.26.1 Structure of Cyanidin-3-Glucoside
ground powder. Cyanidin-3-Glucoside was extracted using 200 300 400 500 600 nm
ultrasonication, and centrifugation and ltering to the extract
were performed. And then, mobile phase A was added to
Fig. 1.26.3 Spectra of Cyanidin-3-Glucoside in Black SoybeanExtract
make a 10-fold dilution. Fig. 1.26.3 shows the spectra of the and Standard Compound
cyanidin-3-glucoside in the black soybean extract solution
and the standard solution. A 3-D plot is shown in Fig. 1.26.4.
Q Peak
35 1. Cyanidin-3-Glucoside
30
25
20
mAU
15
10
280 nm
5
1
520 nm
0
Fig. 1.26.2 Chromatograms of Black Soybean Extract (10 μL Inj.) Fig. 1.26.4 3-D Plot of Black Soybean Extract
40
C Food Product Components
H O
0.00
O
CH3 0 5 10 15
N min
H CH3 mV
HO
N CH3 0
HO
H 0 5 10 15
min
OCH3 Nordihydrocapsaicin
Fig. 1.27.3 Chromatogram of Red Pepper
Fig. 1.27.1 Structure of Capsaicinoids
mAU
1.00
UV 1 Q Peaks
QAnalysis of Spice 1. Capsaicin
0.75
Fig. 1.27.2 shows the sample preparation steps used on the 2. Dihydrocapsaicin
commercial spices and Figs. 1.27.3, Figs. 1.27.4 show the results 0.50 2
of the analysis. With the actual samples, because impurity
substances are eluted out after the dihydrocapsaicin, in order 0.25
to remove those substances from the column we recommend
cleansing the column by f lowing the mobile phase with 0.00
increased level of acetonitrile before each analysis. 0 5 10 15
* The peak indicated by the arrow in the chromatogram is assumed to min
be nordihydrocapsaicin. mV
Fluorescnce 1 Q Peaks
300 1. Capsaicin
Sample(Fig. 1.27.3: 0.1 g, Fig. 1.27.4: 2.0 g) 2. Dihydrocapsaicin
Ethanol 10 mL 200
2
Filtration
0
0 5 10 15
+3/&ѥL inj. min
41
1.28 High Speed Analysis of Isothiocyanates and Sinigrin - LC
10
0
-10
R-N=C=S
CH2CH=CH2 R: 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 min
CH2OH CH3CH2- Ethyl Isothiocyanate
S C NOSO3K
CH2=CHCH2- Allyl Isothiocyanate
H O mAU
CH3CH2CH2- n-Propyl Isothiocyanate
H 50 2
OH H
CH2CH2 2-Phenylethyl Isothiocyanate 40
HO H 30
H HO Phenyl Isothiocyanate 20 1
10
Sinigrin Isothiocyanates
0
-10
min
Fig. 1.28.1 Structures of Isothiocyanates and Sinigrin 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
Q Peaks
1. Sinigrin
2. Allyl Isothiocyanate
+LJK6SHHG$QDO\VLVRI,VRÀDYRQHVLQ6R\- LC
O O OH O OH O
OH OH OH OH
Daidzin Malonyldaidzin Malonylgenistin Genistein
CH2OH CH2OCOCH2COOH
O O
O O O O HO O
HO HO
OH OH
OH OH
H3CO
OH O O O
OH OH OH
Genistin Malonylglycitin Daidzein
2
Water / Ethanol=3/7(v/v)12.5 mL
7
Stir(30 min)
20
1
Centrifuge(3,000 rpm, 15 min)
5
6
Supernatant 3
(4)
0
Filtration (0.45 ѥm) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 min
Q Peaks
1. Daidzin, 2. Genistin, 3. Malonyldaidzin, (4. Malonylglycitin),
4 ѥL Inject into HPLC
5. Malonylgenistin, 6. Daidzein, 7. Genistein
Fig. 1.29.2 Sample Preparation Fig. 1.29.4 Chromatogram of Miso (Soybean Paste)
mAU mAU
40
200
5
2
100 3
20 5
1 7 2
1 3
4 6
4 (6) (7)
0 0
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 min 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 min
Q Peaks Q Peaks
1. Daidzin, 2. Genistin, 3. Malonyldaidzin, 4. Malonylglycitin, 1. Daidzin, 2. Genistin, 3. Malonyldaidzin, 4. Malonylglycitin,
5. Malonylgenistin, 6. Daidzein, 7. Genistein 5. Malonylgenistin, (6. Daidzein), (7. Genistein)
43
1.30 Analysis of Flavonoids in Ginkgo Biloba Extract (1) - LC
HO
mAU
OR1 175
QPeaks
OH O 1. Quercetin (40 mg/L)
150 2. Kaempferol (40 mg/L)
1 3. Isorhamnetin (10 mg/L)
125
Compound R1 R2
Kaempferol H H 100
2
Quercetin H OH
75
Isorhamnetin H OCH 3
50
25 3
Fig. 1.30.1 Structures of 3 Flavonoids
0
44
C Food Product Components
H O
Fig. 1.30.4 Sample Preparation Fig. 1.30.5 Chromatogram of Ginkgo Biloba Dietary Supplement
0 0 0
200 250 300 350 400 nm 200 250 300 350 400 nm 200 250 300 350 400 nm
Standard, Sample
[Reference]
United States Pharmacopeia (USP32-NF27)
45
1.31 Analysis of Terpenoids in Ginkgo Biloba - LC
Tablet Sample
Milling
Methanol
Sonicate (20 min)
Centrifuge (14000 rpm) 10 min
Compound R1 R2
Ginkgolide A H H
Supernatant
25
10.0
20
15 1
5.0 3
10
2
4
0.0 5
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 min
0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 min
Fig. 1.31.2 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of 4 Terpenoids
in Ginkgo Biloba (200 mg/L each, 10 μL injected) Fig. 1.31.4 Chromatogram of Dietary Ginkgo Biloba Supplement
46
C Food Product Components
H O
47
1.32 Analysis of Ginkgolic Acids in Ginkgo Biloba Extract (2) - LC
mAU
QPeaks
1. GA C13:0 (Spiked at 0.0625 mg/L)
2. GA C15:1 (Spiked at 0.25 mg/L)
3. GA C15:0 (Spiked at 0.0625 mg/L)
4. GA C17:1 (Spiked at 0.375 mg/L)
2 4
1 3
Fig. 1.32.4 Sample Preparation Fig. 1.32.5 Chromatogram of Ginkgo Biloba Extract Supplement
(Upper: Spiked, Lower: Not Spiked)
[Reference]
United States Pharmacopeia (USP32-NF27)
48
C Food Product Components
H O
2 2+ 10
+&2
*LQJHURO
0
+2
49
1.33 High Speed Analysis of Gingerol and Shogaol in Ginger (2) - LC
Ginger 1 g 75
Methanol 3 mL 50
2
Homogenize 25
0
Centrifuge (5000 rpm) 5 min
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 min
Residue
Supernatant Methanol 2 mL
Fig. 1.33.4 Chromatogram of Ginger Extract
Inject into HPLC 2 ѥL
1000
750
Ginger
Extract
500
250
50
C Food Product Components
H O
51
1.34 High Speed Analysis of Flavanones in Citrus Juice (2) - LC
0.6 70
60
60
50
Hesperidin Neohesperidin
50
0.4 3 40
40
30 30
0.2 4 20 20
10 10
0.0 0 0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 min 200.0 225.0 250.0 275.0 300.0 325.0 350.0 375.0 nm 200.0 225.0 250.0 275.0 300.0 325.0 350.0 375.0 nm
Inten. (×1,000,000)
Q Peaks 2 Inten. (×100,000) Inten. (×100,000)
1. Narirutin [M-H]- 579 [M-H]- 579
4.00 2. Naringin 2.0 Narirutin Naringin
3. Hesperidin 5.0
1 3 1.5
4. Neohesperidin
3.50
4 TIC 1.0
2.5
3.00 0.5
2 271 557 557
0.0 0.0
2.50 300 400 500 600 m/z 300 400 500 600 m/z
1
2.00 Inten. (×10,000) Inten. (×10,000)
m/z 579 507 1.0 609
2.0 Hesperidin Neohesperidin [M-H]-
1.50
4
1.5 [M-H]-
0.7
1.00 609 0.5
3 1.0
Fig. 1.34.5 Mass Chromatograms and Mass Spectra of Flavanones in Grapefruit Juice using Scan Mode (2 μL injected)
52
C Food Product Components
H O
0.0
R1
R2
Compound R1 R2 R3
Ginsenoside Rg1 OH O-Glc O-Glc
Ginsenoside Re OH O-Glc(2-1)Rha O-Glc
Ginsenoside Rb1 O-Glc(2-1)Glc H O-Glc(6-1)Glc
Ginsenoside Rc O-Glc(2-1)Glc H O-Glc(6-1)Araf
Ginsenoside Rd O-Glc(2-1)Glc H O-Glc
Glc : ћ -D-glucose
Rha : њ -L-rhamnose
Araf : њ -L-arabinose (furanose)
53
1.35 High Speed Analysis of Ginsenosides in Ginseng (2) - LC
Sample 1.0 g
Supernatant ① Residue ①
Dilute with water to 10 mL Condition with water (2 mL)
60 % methanol (aq.) (15 mL)
Sonicate (15 min)
Load the sample
Centrifuge (3000 rpm, 5 min)
Wash with 10 % methanol (aq.) (2 mL)
Supernatant ② Residue ②
Elute with methanol (2 mL)
Supernatants ① + ②
Inject to HPLC
Adjust to 50 mL using 60 % methanol (aq.)
Inject to HPLC
mAU mAU
20.0 20.0
QPeaks QPeaks
1.Ginsenoside Rg1 1.Ginsenoside Rg1
17.5 2.Ginsenoside Re
17.5 2.Ginsenoside Re
3.Ginsenoside Rb1 3.Ginsenoside Rb1
15.0 4.Ginsenoside Rc 15.0 4.Ginsenoside Rc
5.Ginsenoside Rd 1 5.Ginsenoside Rd
12.5 12.5
10.0 10.0 1
3 3
7.5 2 7.5
5.0 4 5.0
4
5 2
5
2.5 2.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 min 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 min
Fig. 1.35.4 Chromatogram of Powdered Ginseng Fig. 1.35.6 Chromatogram of Powdered Ginseng
(Using Sample Preparation 1) (Using Sample Preparation 2)
[Reference]
The 15th Revision of the Japanese Pharmacopeia (Society of Japanese Pharmacopeia)
54
C Food Product Components
H O
CH3
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 min
OH
CH3 CH3 CH3
H 3C
CH3
CH3 CH3 CH3
HO
CH3
Lutein Shim-pack XR-ODS (75 mm L. ×3.0 mm I.D.)
mAU
CH3
OH 22.5
CH3 CH3 CH3 20.0
H 3C 2
17.5
1
CH3 15.0
CH3 CH3 CH3
HO 12.5
CH3
Zeaxanthin 10.0
7.5
5.0
Fig. 1.36.1 Structures of Lutein and Zeaxanthin 2.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 min
QPeaks
1. Zeaxanthin (10 mg/L) 2. Lutein (10 mg/L)
55
1.36 High Speed Analysis of Lutein and Zeaxanthin (2) - LC
0
mAU
150 300 400 500 600
nm
Q Peaks Zeaxanthin
125 1. Zeaxanthin 6
2. Lutein
2
5
100
4
75 3
2
50
1
25
0
1
-25
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Fig. 1.36.5 Spectra of Lutein and Zeaxanthin
min
4 capsules
Tetrahydrofuran 10 mL
Sample solution 1 mL
3 % Pyrogallol-ethanolic solution 10 mL
1 % NaCl 0.5 mL
60 % KOH 1.0 mL
Saponification (30 min, Ý&
Cooling (5 min) 35
30
Ethyl acetate / Hexane (1:9) 15 mL 200 25
1 % NaCl 22.5 mL 250 Lutein 20
Shaking (5 min)
300 15
350 10 Intenisty
Centrifugation (mAU)
400 Zeaxanthin 5
Wavelength 450 0
Aqueous (Lower layer) (nm) 4,000
500
Supernatant (Upper layer) ① Ethyl acetate / Hexane (1:9) 15 mL 3,000
550
Mixing (5 min) ×2 2,000 Time
(min)
1,000
Centrifugation
Supernatant ② Residue
2 μL Injection to HPLC
O
H3CO CH3
H3CO H
O CH3 10
57
2. Food Additives
2.1 Analysis of Food Preservatives (1) - GC/MS
Q Explanation
Food preservatives are used to prevent adverse changes (×10 6)
3.5
and rotting of foods by suppressing the proliferation 3.0
also be used for measurement of many compounds 0.5 50 100 150 200
97
(×105) %
sor bic a cid , met hyl p -hyd rox yb e n z oat e ( PH BA 100
105 Benzoic acid
122 HO O
77
methyl), ethyl p-hyd roxybenzoate (PHBA ethyl), 1.0
50 51
propyl p-hydroxybenzoate (PHBA propyl), and butyl 0.5 0
p-hydroxybenzoate (PHBA butyl), and therefore, gas 50 100 150 200
105
138
0.5
Injection Temp. : &&PLQ&PLQ 0.0
166
-MS- 2.0
50
65 93 OH
I.F. Temp. : 260 °C 0
194
1.0 50 100 150 200
I.S. Temp. : 230 °C 121
138
58
Food Additives
(×10 6)
2.5
5.0
4.0 TIC
3.0 0.0
%
2.0 (×10 5) 100 121 PHBA methyl
1.0 3.0
TIC 50 72 152
93
0.0 2.0
(×10 5) 0
% 50 100 150 200
100 105 1.0 121
3.0 122 Benzoic acid
77 152
50 51
2.0 (×10 5) %
100 121 PHBA ethyl
1.0 0
50 100 150 200
105 3.0 50
122 138
65 93 166
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 2.0
0
50 100 150 200 121
1.0 138
166
180
mAU mAU
55
70 Q Peak Q Peak
1 1. Benzoic Acid 50 1. Sorbic Acid
60 45
40
50 1
35
40 30
25
30 20
15
20
10
10 5
0
0
-5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 min 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 min
Fig. 2.2.1 Chromatogram of a Soft Drink Fig. 2.2.2 Chromatogram of Pickle Juice
60
Food Additives
HOOC H OH H 0.7
O
H
0.6
O
H OH 0.5
H
CH3 O 0.4
H O
H O O 0.3
NH2 HO
1
HO H CH3 0.2
H H
H
0.1
Fig. 2.3.1 Structure of Natamycin 0.0
QAnalysis of Natamycin in Cheese 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 min
Two types of commercial cheese samples were prepared Fig. 2.3.3 Chromatogram of Cheese A (spiked with natamycin)
according to the procedure shown in Fig. 2.3.2, and
analysis was conducted. Each of these samples were mAU
spiked with an appropriate amount of natamycin standard 1.0
0.7
Sample 10 g
0.6
Methanol 50 mL
0.5
Homogenize (5 min)
0.4
Water 50 mL
0.1
Filtration
0.0
Fig. 2.3.2 Sample Preparation Fig. 2.3.4 Chromatogram of Cheese B (spiked with natamycin)
[References]
1) “Ministerial Ordinance Revising Part of the Enforcement Regulations of the Food Sanitation Law, and Partial Revision of Standards for Foods
and Food Additives” (July 28, 2005 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Food Safety Supplement No. 1128002, Japan)
2) “Food Additive Analysis Methods” (July 28, 2005 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Food Safety Supplement No. 1128001, Japan)
61
2.4 Analysis of Food Antioxidants (1) - GC/MS
in Fig. 2.4.1. The TIC chromatogram is shown at the top, and 0.5
the mass spectra of the respective constituent peaks and mass
chromatograms at the characteristic m/z values are shown below. (×105)
Each constituent peak was clearly detected. 3.0
BHT and TBHQ in sample following pretreatment were 0.5 mg/L, 0.25
respectively). The resulting chromatogram is shown in Fig. 2.4.2.
As in Fig. 2.4.1, the TIC chromatogram is shown at the top, and (×105)
the mass spectra of the respective constituent peaks and mass 1.5
chromatograms at the characteristic m/z values are shown
below. In the actual sample as well, peak detection could be 1.0
conducted selectively for the target constituents of the mass
chromatograms at the characteristic m/z values. Mass spectra 0.5
similar to those obtained using the standard solution were also
obtained. The analysis was conducted 3 times to determine 0.0
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
the repeatability of the quantitation values. The repeatability
results and recoveries based on the average quantitation value
with n=3 are shown in Table 2.4.1. Excellent repeatability and Fig. 2.4.1 Chromatograms of BHA, BHT and TBHQ (10 mg/L)
recovery were obtained for the actual sample.
62
Food Additives
Table 2.4.1 Results of Butter Sample Analysis maintenance, since the high-boiling point substances are
Quantitation Values (mg/kg) RSD Average Recovery not introduced into the detector. In addition, high-boiling
1 2 3 Average (%) Rate (%) point substances may not be completely discharged
BHT 6.4 6.2 5.8 6.1 4.7 123 from the column during the analysis. Residual high-
BHA 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 1.3 93 boiling point substances in the column can cause such
TBHQ 5.9 5.9 5.3 5.7 6.4 114 problems as reduced sensitivity and poor repeatability,
so discharging them via the injection port provides an
ef cient means of removing them from the column while
(×105) extending the life of the column. The back ush settings
3.0
were implemented via time program, so that following
2.5
elution of the target components (in this analysis, at 9
2.0
minutes), the split vent pressure was raised from 20 kPa
1.5
to 200 kPa, and at the same time the column pressure was
1.0
reduced to 20 kPa. This program can be set automatically
0.5
using the backflush software utility. Fig. 2.4.3 shows a
(×104)
1.00 comparison of TIC chromatograms of butter analysis
with and without the use of the back ush technique. The
0.75
zoomed chromatograms in Fig. 2.4.3 display only the
0.50 data acquired up to the completion of elution of BHA,
0.25
BHT and TBHQ. Similar chromatograms were obtained
when backf lush was used and when it was not used.
(×104) When backflushing was conducted, however, no peaks
3.0
were detected after the 9 minutes corresponding to the
time setting. Implementing the backf lush prevented
2.0
introduction of the high-boiling point substances into
1.0
the detector, and provided a means of discharging them
ef ciently from the column.
(×103)
4.0
(×106) TIC
3.0 5.0
2.0 4.0
1.0 3.0
&DSLOODU\%DFNÀXVK6\VWHP 5.0
In this investigation, act ual sample analysis was 4.0 Without backflush
63
2.5 High Speed Analysis of Ascorbic Acid and Erythorbic Acid - LC
Q Peak
CH2OH CH2OH 25.0 2. Ascorbic acid
2
HO CH HC OH 20.0
O O
O O
15.0
HO OH HO OH 10.0
mAU
1 Fig. 2.5.3 Chromatogram of Soft Drink A (2 μL injected)
Q Peaks
25.0 1. Erythorbic acid
2
2. Ascorbic acid mAU
30.0
20.0
Q Peak
25.0
15.0 2. Ascorbic acid
20.0
10.0
2
15.0
5.0
10.0
0.0
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 min 5.0
and Erythorbic Acid (20 mg/L each, 2 μL injected) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 min
HO
1 Shim-pack XR-SIL
65
2.7 Simultaneous Determination of Sweeteners in Food (1) - LC
H
Cl OH O
H 5
Cl
O
HO
O O
10
OH
O
HO Cl COOH
H H
1
O
OH
OH
OH
COOH O
O
OH
Sucralose
OH
OH
Glycyrrhizic acid 0
O OCH3 O OCH3
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min
O O
HOOC N HOOC N
H H
H3C NH NH2 Fig. 2.7.2 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of 6 Sweeteners
H 3C
CH3
(100 mg/L each, 10μL injected)
Neotame Aspartame
66
Food Additives
uV uV
Peaks Peaks
10000 1. Acesulfame K 10000 1. Acesulfame K
3. Sucralose 4
4. Aspartame
8000 8000
6000 6000
4000 4000
2000 2000
3
1
1
0 0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min
Fig. 2.7.3 Chromatogram of Coffee Drink (10 μL injected) Fig. 2.7.5 Chromatogram of Carbonated Beverage (10 μL injected)
67
2.8 Analysis of Cyclodextrins in Food (1) - LC
OH
O
OH O O
HO OH O
OH
HO OH
O OH O
HO
OH
O HO O
HO OH
O HO
HO OH
O O OH
O
HO
68
Food Additives
40
Inject to HPLC 10 ѥL
30
20
2) Instant Green Tea 1
10
Sample 0.5 g
Water 20 mL 0
Stir 10 min 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 min
Supernatant 5 mL mV
Acetonitrile 5 mL 20
■ Peak
Filtration (0.45 ѥm) 1.ћ -Cyclodextrin
15
Inject to HPLC 10 ѥL
10
1
75
25
1
69
2.9 Analysis of Sugar Alcohols in Food (1) - LC
HO HO
*Since Palatinol is a mixture of 1-o-Ơ -D-glucopyranosyl-D-
H H glucitol and 1-o-Ơ -D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol, two peaks
OH are eluted.
HO
H OH H OH
Sorbitol
HO H HO H
HO OH
H OH
Xylitol
70
Food Additives
Sample 1 mL 0
Water / Acetonitrile = 5/5 (v/v) 9 mL 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min
Stir
Inject to HPLC 10 ѥL
mV
2) Sugarless Candy 3
800 Peaks
Sample 1.0 g 1. Xylitol
Water 20 mL 700 2. Sorbitol
3. Maltitol
Stir 20 min 600
3) Sugarless Mint Tablet 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min
Sample 0.6 g
Water 20 mL
Fig. 2.9.5 Chromatogram of Sugarless Candy
Stir 20 min
71
2.10+LJK6SHHG$QDO\VLVRI$UWL¿FLDO&RORULQJV - LC
0.0
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 min
nm
300 250
400
500
0.0
700
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 min
■ Peaks
1. Y4 (Tartrazine), 2. R2 (Amaranth), 3. B2 (Indigo Carmine),
4. R102 (New Coccine), 5. Y5 (Sunset Yellow FCF),
6. R40 (Allura Red AC), 7. G3 (Fast Green FCF),
8. B1 (Brilliant Blue FCF), 9. R3 (Erythrosine), 10. R106 (Acid Red),
11. R104 (Phloxine), 12. R105 (Rose Bengale)
72
Food Additives
+LJK6SHHG$QDO\VLVRI$UWL¿FLDO&RORULQJV- LC
Q$QDO\VLVRI$UWL¿FLDO&RORULQJVLQ)RRG
Pickle juice and liquid extract of candy were measured using the analytical conditions shown on the previous page.
The retention times and spectral patterns of the detected peaks matched those of the standard substances.
mAU mAU
40 mAU mAU 40 mAU
30 ■ Peaks 30 ■ Peak
1.0 Peak 4 Peak 10
4. R102
Peak 3
30 30 20 3. B2
20 10. R106
0.5 10 3
10 10
20 0.0 20
0 0
300 500 nm 300 500 nm 300 500 nm
10 10
4
0 0
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 min 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 min
Fig. 2.10.2 Chromatograms and Spectra of Arti cial Colorings in Food (Left: Pickle, Right: Candy)
Q$QDO\VLVRI$UWL¿FLDO&RORULQJV mAU
150
We conducted analysis of 21 artificial substances, 13 16 18 20
+ 10 11
Max.Plot
100 14 15 17 7 8
19 9 21
consisting of those listed on the previous page together 50 1 23 4 5 6 12
Sample 0.5 g
Methanol 5 mL 200
1
Ultrasonic Extraction (30 min)
Supernatant Residue
100
Filtration
Inject to HPLC 50
0 1 2 3 min
74
Food Additives
HO OH
OCH3
H PLQ PLQ
O O
Q3HDNV
(3) %LVGHPHWKR[\FXUFXPLQ'HPHWKR[\FXUFXPLQ&XUFXPLQ
HO OH
OCH3 OCH3 Fig. 2.12.2 PDA Chromatograms, Total Ion Chromatograms
(TIC) of Curcumin Standard Solutions
(a) PDA chromatogram of curcumin (grade A) by HPLC,
Fig. 2.12.1 Structures of Curcuminoids (b) TIC of curcumin (grade A) by HPLC-MS
(1) Bisdemethoxycurcumin (MW 308), (c) PDA chromatogram of curcumin (grade A) by UFLC
(2) Demethoxycurcumin (MW 338), (d) TIC of curcumin (grade A) by UFLC-MS
(3) Curcumin (MW 368) (e) PDA chromatogram of curcumin (grade B) by UFLC
(f) TIC of curcumin (grade B) by UFLC-MS
75
2.12 Analysis of Impurities in Curcumin (2) - LC/MS
Q PDA Data
Fig. 2.12.3 shows the UV spectra of curcuminoids. All of them clearly possess a maximum absorption wavelength near
420 nm. When the peak purity is calculated from the grade A data, an impurity was detected at 5.35 minutes (Fig. 2.12.4 (2)).
mAU mAU mAU
17.5 150 1000
(1) 417 (2) 421 (3) 426
900
15.0 125
800
12.5 700
100
10.0 600
75 500
7.5
400
50
5.0 246 300
240 263
200
2.5 25
100
600
0.0 0 0
200 300 400 500 nm 200 300 400 500 nm 200 300 400 500 nm
Fig. 2.12.3 UV Spectra of Curcuminoids ((1) Bisdemethoxycurcumin, (2) Demethoxycurcumin, (3) Curcumin)
Fig. 2.12.4 Purity Curves of Curcuminoids ((1) Bisdemethoxycurcumin, (2) Demethoxycurcumin, (3) Curcumin)
QAnother Impurity
Focusing on the peak (compound X) at 5.35 minutes in the in the vicinity of 370 nm, and the m/z 369 negative ion was
mass chromatograms of Fig. 2.12.4 (2), the UV spectrum detected. Therefore, the molecular weight of compound X is
and mass spectrum were obtained for this peak, as shown presumed to 370. Thus, by using both PDA and MS in UFLC
in the Fig. 2.12.5. The maximum absorption wavelength is detection, greater ef ciency is believed to be possible.
Inten. (×1,000,000) (×1,000,000)
3.50
3.25 (a) 10.0 (b)
3
3.00 7.5 373
2.75 QPeaks
2.50 1. Bisdemethoxycurcumin,2 5.0
2. Demethoxycurcumin,
2.25 2.5 255 282
3. Curcumin
2.00 X
1 0.0
1.75 TIC
1.50 200 300 400 500 nm
Inten. (×10,000)
1.25 m/z 307 6.0
(c) 369
1.00 5.0
m/z 337
0.75 4.0
0.50 m/z 369 3.0
0.25 2.0
0.00 m/z 367
1.0
169 397
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 min 0.0
200 300 400 m/z
Fig. 2.12.5 Mass chromatograms of curcumin standard solution (grade A, (a)) and UV spectrum (b), mass spectrum (c) of compound X
76
Food Additives
6XSHUQDWDQW 5HVLGXH
ĸ(WKDQROP/
6KDNHPLQ
P$8 Q3HDNV &HQWULIXJHPLQ
6XGDQ2UDQJH*D
6XSHUQDWDQW5HVLGXH
6XGDQ2UDQJH*E
6XGDQ5HG* )LOOXSWRP/ZLWKHWKDQRO
6XGDQⅠ
6XGDQⅡ )LOWHUHG
6XGDQⅢ ,QMHFWWR+3/&
6XGDQ5HG%
6XGDQⅣ
Fig. 2.13.2 Sample Pretreatment
PLQ
77
2.14 Analysis of Sudan Dyes and Para Red - LC/MS
Fig. 2.14.1 Positive ESI Mass Spectra of Sudan Dyes and Para Red
Fig. 2.14.2 SIM Chromatograms of Chili Powder Extract with 5 μg/mL Sudan Dyes and Para Red (Black), Chili Powder Extract (Red),
and Sudan Dyes and Para Red (Blue) at 500 ng/mL each
78
Food Additives
■ Peaks ■ Peaks
1. Limonene 1. Limonene
2. 1,8-Cineole 2. 1,8-Cineole
3. trans-Sabinenehydrate 3. Menthone
4. L-Menthone
5. Menthoturan 4. Terpinene-4-ol
6. D-Isomenthone 5. ћ -Caryophyllene
7. Neo-Menthol 6. Dihydrocarvone
8. Terpinene-4-ol 7. Carvone
9. ћ -Caryophyllene
12 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 10. Menthol 12 3 4 5 6 7
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
0
4
8
0
4
8
Fig. 2.15.1 Analysis of Peppermint Oil Fig. 2.15.2 Analysis of Spearmint Oil
79
2.16 Flavor Analysis by Fast - GC/MS (1) - GC/MS
Q Explanation
Fast-GC/MS is an effective way to improve laboratory acquisition technology. Shimadzu GCMS systems offer
productivit y by shor tening analysis cycle times. the high-performance levels necessary to satisfy these
Fast-GC/MS methods require a system with a high- requirements. Here we show the results from analyzing
performance AFC controller that is compatible with lavender oil using conventional methods and Fast-GC/MS
narrow bore capillary columns and high-speed data methods.
QAnalytical Conditions
Conventional-GC/MS
Instrument : GCMS-QP2010 Ultra
Column : 5W[06P/ðPP,'ƫP
Glass Insert : Split insert with deactivated glass wool
31
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Interface Temp. : 250 °C
Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ& Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
PLQ Measurement Mode : Scan
Injection Mode : Split Mass Range : m/z 40 - 400
Carrier Gas : He Event Time : 0.3 sec
Control Mode : /LQHDUYHORFLW\FPVHF Emission Current : ƫ$
Split Ratio : 1:100 KLJKVHQVLWLYLW\
Injection Volume : ƫ/
Fast-GC/MS
Instrument : GCMS-QP2010 Ultra
Column : 5W[P/ðPP,'ƫP
Glass Insert : Split insert with deactivated glass wool
31
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Interface Temp. : 250 °C
Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ& Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
&PLQ&PLQ Measurement Mode : Scan
Injection Mode : Split Mass Range : m/z 40 - 400
Carrier Gas : He Event Time : 0.05 sec
Control Mode : /LQHDUYHORFLW\FPVHF Emission Current : ƫ$
Split Ratio : 1:1800 KLJKVHQVLWLYLW\
Injection Volume : ƫ/
80
Food Additives
QResults
Fast-GC/MS provided separation patterns similar to results from conventional methods, but analysis times were 1/7 of
conventional analysis times.
(×1,000,000)
7
10
9
TIC
13
1
5.0
3
4.0
3.0
6
12
2
2.0
5
11
15
4
1.0
14
16
8
19
18
17
7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5 35.0 37.5 min
(×1,000,000)
10
9
TIC
7
13
3.0
1
2.5
3
2.0
6
12
1.5
2
1.0
5
11
15
14
4
0.5
16
19
17
18
8
Fig. 2.16.1 Total Ion Current Chromatograms Obtained Using Conventional Method (upper) and Fast-GC/MS Method (lower)
81
2.17 Analysis of Benzoyl Peroxide in Foods - LC
Flour 10 g
5.0 g/L STD 10 ѥL
Add 50 mL Acetonitrile
O O
C O O C Agitation for 15 min by a stirring bar
20 ѥL inj.
mAU
1 Q Peak
1.Benzoyl Peroxide
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
min
Fig. 2.17.3 Chromatogram of Flour sample - Upper: Spiked with 1.0 mg/L Benzoyl Peroxide, Lower: Not spiked (20 μL inj. each)
82
3. Aromas and Odors
3.1 Analysis of Aroma Compounds in Peach Juice (1) - GC/MS
Q Explanation
The OPTIC-4 is a multimode injection system with a variety of adsorbent materials used in the MonoTrap, it
thermal desorption function that enables performing can efficiently concentrate many compounds, including
thermal desor ption by placing an adsorbent in the polar compounds, enabling ultra-high-sensitivity analysis.
injection port liner cup. In combination with the new This was used as a monolithic material sorptive extraction
MonoTrap adsorbent, the system enables analyzing aroma (MMSE) method for GC/MS pretreatment. In this case,
components with high sensitivity. the MonoTrap RGC18TD (for thermal desorption), a
The MonoTrap is a completely new trapping tool with a hybrid graphite carbon and octadecyl group type sorbent,
proprietary monolithic porous high-purity silica structure was used to concentrate aroma components in peach
that concentrates trace components using the adsorptive juice, which were analyzed using a high-polarity capillary
capacity provided by its large surface area. Due to a wide column.
Q Experimental
Collection
30 mL of commercial peach juice and MonoTrap RGC18
TD were placed in a 40 mL vial and stirred for one hour at
room temperature for sampling.
Analysis
0RQR7UDS5*&7' 6SHFLDOL]HG/LQHU
The MonoTrap material was removed from the vial, &DW1R &DW1R
its surface lightly rinsed with water, and placed in a 0DQXIDFWXUHGE\*/6FLHQFHV,QF 0DQXIDFWXUHGE\*/6FLHQFHV,QF
QAnalytical Conditions
Instruments
Injection (TD) : 237,&$7$6*/,QWHUQDWLRQDO%9(LQGKRYHQWKH1HWKHUODQGV
GC-MS : *&06438OWUD6KLPDG]X
Column : InertCap Pure-WAX (0.25 mm × 30 m, df ƫP*/6FLHQFHV-DSDQ
[Injector] [MS]
Thermal Desorption Temp. : & &VHF Interface Temp. : 250 ºC
200 ºC Ion Source Temp. : 200 ºC
Carrier Gas : He Solvent Elution Time : 0.5 min
Column Flowrate : 1.0 mL/min Data Sampling Time : 1.0 - 60 min
Split Flowrate : 5:50 Measurement Mode : TIC
Cryofocus Temp. : Trap -160 ºC Mass Range : m/z 30-600
Introduction 250 ºC Detector Voltage : N9DEVROXWHYDOXH
[GC]
Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ&PLQ
83
3.1 Analysis of Aroma Compounds in Peach Juice (2) - GC/MS
( 10,000,000) ( 10,000,000)
TIC TIC
3.0
30 29
32
3.0
16
29
33
4
2.5
8
2.5
5
6
38
10
8
9
4
1
2
33
38
2.0 2.0
16
10
9
15
28
19
30
1.5 1.5
5
2
18
20
25
24
13
1
1.0 1.0
12
15
37
31
22
27
25
20 19
28
11
37
23 22
35
0.5 0.5
31
34
36
21
24
14
23
36
35
12
26
18
3
17
27
26
13
21
0.0 0.0
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 5.0 10.0 15.020.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
Time (min) Time (min)
MMSE Method SBSE Method (conventional method)
Fig. 3.1.1 Comparison of Chromatograms Obtained Using the MMSE (with MonoTrap) and Conventional (SBSE) Methods
QSummary
The MMSE method using the MonoTrap monolithic which had previously been an issue when analyzing aroma
adsorbent enabled the use of a simple procedure to highly components, was presumably due to the ef cient thermal
concentrate trace aroma components. The high sensitivity desorption provided by the OPTIC-4 multimode inlet.
is not only due to the high concentration levels, but also The combination of concentration by the MMSE method
due to the improved adsorption ef ciency of the graphite and the OPTIC-4 multimode inlet provides an excellent
carbon contained in the MonoTrap’s base silica structure alternative to SBSE and other typical concentrating
and to the use of a high-polarity deactivated column. In methods for detecting or screening low-concentration
addition, the improved sensitivity for polar compounds, compounds in gaseous form.
84
Aromas and Odors
Q Explanation
Volatile compounds, including aroma compounds, carbon (graphite carbon for Mono Trap TD) and the
in Parmesan and Blue cheese were analyzed using octadecyl functional group. GC-MS equipped with the
adsorption and thermal desorption GC/MS (TD-GC/ OPTIC-4 multi-purpose injector was used for thermal
MS). MonoTrap was used as adsorbant. It is a state-of- desorption. The OPTIC-4 allows direct introduction
the-art silica monolithic and hybrid adsorbent having a of desorbed gas into a capillary column without re-
large surface area and properties based on silica, activated adsorption.
Q Experimental
Sample Preparation
MonoTrap RGC18 TD is conditioned and packed into an
ampoule (Fig. 3.2.1) before shipment and therefore showed
an extremely low blank. It was used without conditioning.
Ten grams of each cheese sample were weighed and placed
into a vial (40 mL). MonoTrap was placed over the sample in Fig. 3.2.1 MonoTrap Packed into an Ampoule for TD (left)
MonoTrap RGC18 TD (right)
the vial using the MonoTrap holder. The vials were capped
and agitated for 3 hours at 600 °C.
TD-GC/MS Analysis
MonoTrap RGC18 TD was removed and placed into the
OPTIC-4 liner.
QAnalytical Conditions
Instruments
Injection Unit : OPTIC-4
GC-MS : GCMS-QP2010 Ultra
Auto-Sampler : AOC-5000 Plus LINEX system
Column : InertCap Pure-WAX (60 m × 0.25 mm I.D.,
df ƫP*/6FLHQFHV,QF
Fig. 3.2.2 OPTIC-4 (left) and GCMS-QP2010 Ultra equipped
[OPTIC-4]
with OPTIC-4 and AOC-5000 Plus (right). Liner can
Desorb Temp. : 200 ºC be automatically exchanged using the AOC-5000 Plus.
Desorb Time : 5 min
Carrier Gas : He
Column Flow : 1.0 mL/min
Injection Mode : Splitless
Cryo Trapping : -150 ºC
Injection Temp. : 250 ºC
[MS]
Interface Temp. : 230 ºC
Ion Source Temp. : 200 ºC
Acquisition Mode : Scan
Mass Range : m/z 29-600
[GC]
Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ&
85
3.2 Analysis of Aroma Compounds in Cheese (2) - GC/MS
7,&
PLQ
7,&
PLQ
QSummary
Sulfur compounds in the cheese were easily and simply detected using MonoTrap and TD-GC/MS (OPTIC-4 and GC-MS).
86
Aromas and Odors
Q Experimental
A standard MIBP solution was added to commercially- and then the gaseous phase MIBP was collected using
available sauvignon blanc (produced in Chile in 2012) MonoTrap® RGPS TDNote (GL Sciences, P/N: 1050-
and cabernet sauvignon (produced in Chile in 2012) at 74202). After collection, the MonoTrap® RGPS TD was
different concentrations (0 ng/L, 1 ng/L, 5 ng/L, 10 ng/L, measured using the following analytical conditions.
and 20 ng/L). The samples were heated for 1 hour at 50 °C,
QAnalytical Conditions
Autosampler : AOC-5000 Plus
OPTIC Liner Auto Exchange System : CDC + LINEX
Multipurpose Injection Port : OPTIC-4
GC-MS : GCMS-TQ8030
Column : InertCap 17MS (Length: 30 m, 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 ƫP
*/6FLHQFHV31
[OPTIC-4] [GC]
Initial Temp. : 35 ºC Column Temp. : &PLQ-&PLQ-&PLQ
Ramp Rate : 10 ºC/sec [MS]
Hold Temp. : 250 ºC Ion Source Temp. : 200 ºC
Hold Time : 300 sec Interface Temp. : 250 ºC
Column Flow1 : 5 mL/min Ionization Method : 3RVLWLYHFKHPLFDOLRQL]DWLRQ3&,
Column Flow Time : 320 sec Reagent Gas : ,VREXWDQHN3D
Column Flow2 : 1.5 mL/min Acquisition Mode : MRM
Split Flow1 : 5 mL/min Event Time : 0.3 sec
Split Flow Time : 320 sec Monitor Ion and Collision : m/z!9
Split Flow2 : 50 mL/min Energy (CE) m/z!9
QResults
Fig. 3.3.1 shows the calibrations curves for sauvignon in the wines. Table 3.3.1 shows the results of quantitatively
blanc and cabernet sauvignon via the standard addition analyzing each wine 3 times via the standard
method. Favorable results were obtained for the addition method and the repeatability. The respective
correlation coef cient (R) between area and concentration concentrations of MIBP in the wines were 5.4 ng/L for the
for each MIBP-spiked sample, with 0.9999 for the sauvignon blanc and 12.1 ng/L for the cabernet sauvignon.
sauvignon blanc and 0.9998 for the cabernet sauvignon. In addition, favorable results of 3 % RSD were obtained
Fig. 3.3.2 shows the MRM chromatograms for the MIBP for the repeatability.
87
3.3 Higher Sensitivity Analysis of 2-Methoxy-3-Isobutylpyrazine
(MIBP) in Wine (2) - GC/MS/MS
Area Area
35000
R=0.9999 R=0.9998
10000 30000
25000
7500
20000
5000 15000
10000
2500
5000
0 0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 ⃰ᗘ
Conc. 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 ⃰ᗘ
Conc.
Fig. 3.3.1 Calibration Curves for the Wines via the Standard Addition Method
Left: Sauvignon Blanc (Concentrations of 0 ng/L, 1 ng/L, 5 ng/L, and 10 ng/L)
Right: Cabernet Sauvignon (Concentrations of 0 ng/L, 5 ng/L, 10 ng/L, and 20 ng/L)
(×1,000) (×1,000)
167.10>124.10 167.10>124.10
6.0 167.10>135.10
2.5 167.10>135.10
5.0
2.0
4.0
1.5
3.0
1.0
2.0
0.5 1.0
Fig. 3.3.2 MRM Chromatograms for the MIBP in the Wines (Left: Sauvignon Blanc, Right: Cabernet Sauvignon)
Table 3.3.1 Quantitative Results for the MIBP in the Wines via the Standard Addition Method
(Concentration Units: ng/L), and the Repeatability (n=3)
QConclusion
The trace quantities of MIBP in the wines were collected and concentrated by the MonoTrap® RGPS TD, and then
selectively detected by utilizing the GC-MS/MS in PCI mode with MRM acquisition mode. It was thus possible to detect
MIBP at the ng/L level with high sensitivity.
88
4. Residual Pesticides
4.1 Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Baby
Foods (1) - GC/MS/MS
Q Introduction The selectivity of the MRM mode is illustrated in the
Contamination of food products with pesticides is a chromatograms of three OP pesticides shown in Fig. 4.1.2.
growing global concern, particularly for baby foods. GC/ In Fig. 4.1.2, the top chromatograms are the extracted ion
MS/MS operated in the Multiple Reaction Monitoring chromatograms (mass chromatograms) from the full-scan
(MRM) mode is a technique of choice for analysis of (Q3 scan) data, and the bottom chromatograms are the
trace contaminants in complex matrices because of its corresponding chromatograms from the MRM mode. The
improved sensitivity and selectivity compared to single MRM operation mode allows detection and quantitation
quadrupole GCMS. of trace concentrations of analytes in complex matrices
such as food extracts, virtually eliminating background
interference.
Q Experimental
Samples were prepared using the QuEChERS (Quick Calibration Results and Assessment of Precision
Easy Cheap Ef fect ive Rugged a nd Safe) sa mple Seven calibration standards were prepared in the blended
preparation method1). Analyses were conducted using peas extract over the range of 0.5-200 ng/mL (ppb).
a Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8030 GC/MS/MS operated in Response factors were calculated and relative standard
the MRM mode using conditions detailed Shimadzu deviation (RSD) determined by the GCMSsolution
Application News GCMS-13042). A 7-point calibration software. The precision of the calibration was evaluated
curve was prepared for 24 OP-pesticides using the matrix- using the RSD of the response factors and the correlation
matched internal standard procedure, and a sample of coef cient (r) for each of the analytes. In general, the %
organic blended peas to minimize contribution of analytes RSD was 25 % and correlation coef cient values for the
from the sample matrix. multi-point calibration were > 0.999.
Example calibration curves are shown in Fig. 4.1.3;
chromatograms correspond to the 1 ppb standard.
QResults and Discussion
GCMSMS Operation in the MRM Mode
Operation of the GCMS-TQ8030 in the MRM mode
provides excellent sensitivity and selectivity for analysis
of trace level contaminants in complex matrices.
Relationship between the responses of the pesticides of
interest relative to the matrix background is shown in
Fig. 4.1.1.
Fig. 4.1.1 Total Ion Chromatograms of Blended Peas Extract and Pesticides Standard (100 ppb)
89
4.1 Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Baby
Foods (2) - GC/MS/MS
Fig. 4.1.2 Extracted Ion and MRM Chromatograms for Selected Pesticides
90
Residual Pesticides
91
4.2 Analysis of Pesticides in Baby Foods (2) - GC/MS/MS
Q1: Unit
Mycyclobutanil Cyprodanil
Q3: Unit
Q1: Unit
Q3: Low
Q1: Low
Q3: Low
Fig. 4.2.2 MRM Chromatograms for Trace Pesticides at Three Settings of MS Resolution
[References]
1) AOAC Of cial Method 2007.01, Pesticide Residues in Foods by Acetonitrile Extraction and Partitioning with Magnesium Sulfate (2007)
2) Analysis of Pesticides in Baby Foods Using a GCMS-TQ8030 GC/MS/MS, PartⅡ Shimadzu Application News No. GCMS-1402
(December, 2013)
3) Shimadzu GCMSMS Pesticide Database (October, 2012)
4) Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Baby Foods Using a Triple-Quadrupole
GC/MS/MS System Shimadzu Application News No. GCMS-1304 (February, 2013)
92
Residual Pesticides
Limonene
Fig. 4.3.1B Total Ion Chromatogram of Organic Orange Oil – Q3 Scan Mode
93
4.3 Analysis of Pesticides in Citrus Oil (2) - GC/MS/MS
Fig. 4.3.2A MRM Chromatogram Carbofuran - 50 ppb in Orange Oil Fig. 4.3.2B MRM Chromatogram Metalaxyl - 50 ppb in Orange Oil
[References]
1) Shimadzu Application News No. GCMS-1304 (February, 2013)
2) Shimadzu Application News No. GCMS-1404 (February, 2014)
3) Shimadzu GCMSMS Pesticide Database (October, 2012)
94
Residual Pesticides
QAnalytical Conditions
Instrument : GCMS-TQ8030
Column : Rxi-5Sil MS (30 m length, 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm)
GlassLiner : Sky Liner, Splitless Single Taper Gooseneck w/Wool (Restek Corporation, catalog # 567366)
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C
Interface Temp. : 250 °C
Column Temp. : 70 °C (2 min) - (25 °C/min) - 150 °C - (3 °C/min) - 200 °C -
Ion Source Temp. : 230 °C
(8 °C/min) - 280 °C/min (10 min)
Data Acquisition Mode : MRM (See the below.)
Injection Mode : Splitless
Flow Control Mode : Linear velocity (58.1 cm/sec.)
Injection Volume : 1 μL
MRM Monitoring m/z
Quantitative Transition Qualitative Transition Quantitative Transition Qualitative Transition
Com pound Name Precursor>Product CE (V) Precursor>Product CE (V) Compound Nam e Precursor>Product CE (V) Precursor>Product CE (V)
Diphenylam ine 169.10>77.00 26 169.10>115.10 30 Buprofezin 172.10>57.10 18 105.10>104.10 4
Ethoprophos 200.00>157.90 6 200.00>114.00 14 200.00>97.00 26 Bupirimate 273.10>193.20 8 273.10>108.00 18
Chlorpropham 213.10>171.10 6 213.10>127.10 18 beta-Endosulfan 240.90>205.90 14 238.90>203.90 14
Trifluralin 306.10>264.00 8 264.10>206.10 8 264.10>160.10 18 Oxadixyl 163.10>132.10 10 163.10>117.10 24
Dicloran 206.00>176.00 12 206.00>124.00 26 176.00>148.00 12 Ethion 231.00>174.90 14 231.00>128.90 26
Propyzam ide 172.90>144.90 16 172.90>109.00 26 T riazophos 161.10>134.10 8 161.10>106.10 14
Chlorothalonil 265.90>230.90 14 265.90>167.90 24 263.90>167.90 24 Endosulfan sulfate 386.90>252.90 10 386.90>216.90 26
Diazinon 304.10>179.10 12 179.20>137.20 18 Propiconazole-1 259.10>190.90 8 259.10>172.90 18 259.10>69.10 12
Pyrim ethanil 199.10>184.10 14 199.10>158.10 14 Propiconazole-2 259.10>190.90 8 259.10>172.90 18 259.10>69.10 12
T efluthrin 197.10>141.10 26 177.10>127.10 32 T ebuconazole 252.10>127.00 24 250.10>125.10 24
Pirim icarb 238.20>166.10 10 166.10>96.00 14 Iprodione 314.10>244.90 12 314.10>56.10 24
Chlorpyrifos-m ethyl 285.90>270.90 12 285.90>93.00 22 Brom opropylate 340.90>184.90 18 182.90>154.90 16
Vinclozolin 212.10>172.00 14 212.10>144.90 26 212.10>109.00 30 Bifenthrin 181.10>166.10 16 181.10>165.10 22 181.10>153.10 10
Parathion-m ethyl 263.10>109.00 18 263.10>81.00 26 Fenpropathrin 265.10>210.10 12 181.10>152.10 24 181.10>127.10 26
T olclofos-m ethyl 265.00>249.90 12 265.00>93.00 24 Fenazaquin 160.20>145.10 8 145.20>115.10 24 145.20>91.10 24
Metalaxyl 206.20>162.10 8 206.20>132.10 18 T ebufenpyrad 333.20>276.10 8 333.20>171.00 22
Fenitrothion 277.10>125.00 18 277.10>109.00 18 T etradifon 355.90>158.90 12 353.90>159.00 12 228.90>200.90 14
Pirim iphos-m ethyl 305.10>290.10 12 290.10>125.00 24 Phosalone 182.00>138.00 8 182.00>111.00 18 182.00>102.10 18
Dichlofluanid 332.00>167.10 6 224.00>123.00 12 Pyriproxyfen 136.10>96.00 12 136.10>78.00 24
Malathion 173.10>117.00 12 173.10>99.00 18 Cyhalothrin 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.00 14 163.10>91.00 22
Chlorpyrifos 196.90>168.90 14 196.90>107.00 26 Fenarim ol 251.00>139.00 18 139.10>111.00 16
Fenthion 278.10>125.00 22 278.10>109.00 18 Acrinathrin 289.10>93.10 12 181.10>152.10 24 208.10>181.10 8
Parathion 291.10>109.00 14 291.10>81.00 26 Perm ethrin-1 183.10>168.10 12 183.10>153.10 18 183.10>115.10 24
T etraconazole 336.10>218.00 18 336.10>204.00 26 Pyridaben 147.20>132.10 14 147.20>117.10 22
Pendim ethalin 252.20>162.10 12 252.20>161.10 12 Perm ethrin-2 183.10>168.10 12 183.10>153.10 18 183.10>115.10 24
Cyprodinil 225.20>224.10 6 224.20>208.10 18 Cyfluthrin-1 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
(E)-Chlorfenvinphos 323.10>266.90 14 267.00>159.00 18 Cyfluthrin-2 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
T olylfluanid 137.10>91.00 18 137.10>65.00 26 Cyfluthrin-3 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Fipronil 367.00>227.90 26 367.00>212.90 26 Cyfluthrin-4 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Captan 79.00>77.00 8 79.00>51.00 22 Cyperm ethrin-1 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
(Z)-Chlorfenvinphos 323.10>266.90 14 267.00>159.00 18 Cyperm ethrin-2 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Phenthoate 274.10>125.00 18 274.10>121.10 12 Cyperm ethrin-3 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Fol pet 147.10>103.10 10 147.10>76.00 26 Cyperm ethrin-4 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Procymidone 283.10>96.10 12 283.10>67.10 24 Ethofenprox 163.20>135.00 10 163.20>107.10 18
Methidathion 145.10>85.00 8 145.10>58.00 18 Fenvalerate-1 125.10>99.00 22 125.10>89.00 22
alpha-Endosulfan 240.90>205.90 14 238.90>203.90 16 tau-Fluvarlinate-1 250.10>200.10 16 250.10>55.00 18
Mepanipyrim 222.20>220.10 8 222.20>193.10 26 Fenvalerate-2 125.10>99.00 22 125.10>89.00 22
Profenofos 337.10>266.80 16 207.90>63.00 26 tau-Fluvarlinate-2 250.10>200.10 16 250.10>55.00 18
Myclobutanil 179.10>152.00 8 179.10>125.00 16 Deltam ethrin-1 252.90>93.10 18 181.10>152.10 24
Flusilazole 233.10>165.10 18 233.10>152.10 18 Deltam ethrin-2 252.90>93.10 18 181.10>152.10 24
95
4.4 Simultaneous Analysis of Residual Pesticides in Foods
via the QuEChERS Method (2) - GC/MS/MS
QResults
Calibration curves for each pesticide obtained by analyzing six calibration standards (0.001 mg/L to 0.1 mg/L), the
mass chromatograms for the 0.01 mg/L samples, and the area repeatability (n=6) for each pesticide obtained from the
pesticide-spiked samples (0.01 mg/L) are shown below.
Chlorpyrifos Fenazaquin
Area (×1,000,000) (×10,000) Area (×1,000,000) (×100,000)
196.90>168.90 160.20>145.10
2.5 5.0 1.25
1.00 R = 0.9990831 196.90>107.00 R = 0.9990383 145.20>115.10
145.20>91.10
2.0 4.0 1.00
0.75
1.5 3.0 0.75
0.50
1.0 2.0 0.50
0.25 0.5 1.0 0.25
0.00 0.0
0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 Conc. 16.75 17.00 17.25 17.50 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 Conc. 27.25 27.50 27.75 28.00
alpha-Endosulfan Fenvalerate-1
Area (×100,000) (×10,000) Area (×100,000) (×1,000)
240.90>205.90 2.5 125.10>89.00
R = 0.999708 1.00 238.90>203.90 R = 0.9995097 8.0 125.10>99.00
4.0
2.0
3.0 0.75 6.0
1.5
2.0 0.50 4.0
1.0
0.0 0.0
0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 Conc. 20.25 20.50 20.75 21.00 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 Conc. 32.00 32.25 32.50 32.75
Fig. 4.4.1 Calibration Curves for Each Pesticide and the Mass Chromatograms for the 0.01 mg/L Samples
[Reference]
1) EURL-FV Multiresidue Method using QuEChERS followed by GC-QqQ/MS/MS and LC-QqQ/MS/MS for Fruits and Vegetables
(European Reference Laboratory, 2010-M1)
96
Residual Pesticides
Q Explanation Q Experimental
The GCMS-TQ8030 is a triple quadrupole GC-MS/ For the evaluation, analytical standards (0.001 mg/L
MS system equipped with scan/MRM mode to allow to 0.1 mg/L) were used, as well as samples (0.01 mg/
simultaneous scan and MR M data measurements. L) created by pretreating paprika with the QuEChERS
Here we introduce the results of an investigation method, and then adding pesticides to the obtained
using the scan/MRM mode, where target pesticides solution. The pesticides specified as targets and their
were quantitatively determined using the MRM data, transitions were those recommended in the results of
and concentrations of the untargeted pesticides were the validity evaluations by the European Reference
estimated by applying the scan data to the Compound Laboratory1).
Composer Database Software Ver. 2.
QAnalytical Conditions
Instrument : GCMS-TQ8030
Column : Rxi-5Sil MS (30 m length, 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm)
Glass Liner : Sky Liner, Splitless Single Taper Gooseneck w/Wool (Restek Corporation, catalog # 567366)
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Interface Temp. : 300 °C
Column Temp. : 40 °C (2 min) - (8 °C/min) - 310 °C (5 min) Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
Injection Mode : Splitless Data Acquisition Mode : Scan/MRM
Flow Control Mode : Linear velocity (40.0 cm/sec) Event Time : 0.1 sec (Scan), 0.3 sec (MRM)
Injection Volume : 1 μL Scan Mass Range : m/z 50 – 500
Scan Speed : 5,000 u/sec
MRM Monitoring m/z
Quantitative Transition Qualitative Transition Quantitative Transition Qualitative Transition
Com pound Name Precursor >Product CE (V) Precursor>Product CE (V) Compound Nam e Precursor>Product CE (V) Precursor>Product CE (V)
Diphenylam ine 169.10>77.00 26 169.10>115.10 30 Buprofezin 172.10>57.10 18 105.10>104.10 4
Ethoprophos 200.00>157.90 6 200.00>114.00 14 200.00>97.00 26 Bupirimate 273.10>193.20 8 273.10>108.00 18
Chlorpropham 213.10>171.10 6 213.10>127.10 18 beta-Endosulfan 240.90>205.90 14 238.90>203.90 14
Trifluralin 306.10>264.00 8 264.10>206.10 8 264.10>160.10 18 Oxadixyl 163.10>132.10 10 163.10>117.10 24
Dicloran 206.00>176.00 12 206.00>124.00 26 176.00>148.00 12 Ethion 231.00>174.90 14 231.00>128.90 26
Propyzam ide 172.90>144.90 16 172.90>109.00 26 T riazophos 161.10>134.10 8 161.10>106.10 14
Chlorothalonil 265.90>230.90 14 265.90>167.90 24 263.90>167.90 24 Endosulfan sulfate 386.90>252.90 10 386.90>216.90 26
Diazinon 304.10>179.10 12 179.20>137.20 18 Propiconazole-1 259.10>190.90 8 259.10>172.90 18 259.10>69.10 12
Pyrim ethanil 199.10>184.10 14 199.10>158.10 14 Propiconazole-2 259.10>190.90 8 259.10>172.90 18 259.10>69.10 12
T efluthrin 197.10>141.10 26 177.10>127.10 32 T ebuconazole 252.10>127.00 24 250.10>125.10 24
Pirim icarb 238.20>166.10 10 166.10>96.00 14 Iprodione 314.10>244.90 12 314.10>56.10 24
Chlorpyrifos-m ethyl 285.90>270.90 12 285.90>93.00 22 Brom opropylate 340.90>184.90 18 182.90>154.90 16
Vinclozolin 212.10>172.00 14 212.10>144.90 26 212.10>109.00 30 Bifenthrin 181.10>166.10 16 181.10>165.10 22 181.10>153.10 10
Parathion-m ethyl 263.10>109.00 18 263.10>81.00 26 Fenpropathrin 265.10>210.10 12 181.10>152.10 24 181.10>127.10 26
T olclofos-m ethyl 265.00>249.90 12 265.00>93.00 24 Fenazaquin 160.20>145.10 8 145.20>115.10 24 145.20>91.10 24
Metalaxyl 206.20>162.10 8 206.20>132.10 18 T ebufenpyrad 333.20>276.10 8 333.20>171.00 22
Fenitrothion 277.10>125.00 18 277.10>109.00 18 T etradifon 355.90>158.90 12 353.90>159.00 12 228.90>200.90 14
Pirim iphos-m ethyl 305.10>290.10 12 290.10>125.00 24 Phosalone 182.00>138.00 8 182.00>111.00 18 182.00>102.10 18
Dichlofluanid 332.00>167.10 6 224.00>123.00 12 Pyriproxyfen 136.10>96.00 12 136.10>78.00 24
Malathion 173.10>117.00 12 173.10>99.00 18 Cyhalothrin 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.00 14 163.10>91.00 22
Chlorpyrifos 196.90>168.90 14 196.90>107.00 26 Fenarim ol 251.00>139.00 18 139.10>111.00 16
Fenthion 278.10>125.00 22 278.10>109.00 18 Acrinathrin 289.10>93.10 12 181.10>152.10 24 208.10>181.10 8
Parathion 291.10>109.00 14 291.10>81.00 26 Perm ethrin-1 183.10>168.10 12 183.10>153.10 18 183.10>115.10 24
T etraconazole 336.10>218.00 18 336.10>204.00 26 Pyridaben 147.20>132.10 14 147.20>117.10 22
Pendim ethalin 252.20>162.10 12 252.20>161.10 12 Perm ethrin-2 183.10>168.10 12 183.10>153.10 18 183.10>115.10 24
Cyprodinil 225.20>224.10 6 224.20>208.10 18 Cyfluthrin-1 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
(E)-Chlorfenvinphos 323.10>266.90 14 267.00>159.00 18 Cyfluthrin-2 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
T olylfluanid 137.10>91.00 18 137.10>65.00 26 Cyfluthrin-3 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Fipronil 367.00>227.90 26 367.00>212.90 26 Cyfluthrin-4 206.10>151.20 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Captan 79.00>77.00 8 79.00>51.00 22 Cyperm ethrin-1 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
(Z)-Chlorfenvinphos 323.10>266.90 14 267.00>159.00 18 Cyperm ethrin-2 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Phenthoate 274.10>125.00 18 274.10>121.10 12 Cyperm ethrin-3 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Fol pet 147.10>103.10 10 147.10>76.00 26 Cyperm ethrin-4 181.10>152.10 24 163.10>127.10 6 163.10>91.00 14
Procymidone 283.10>96.10 12 283.10>67.10 24 Ethofenprox 163.20>135.00 10 163.20>107.10 18
Methidathion 145.10>85.00 8 145.10>58.00 18 Fenvalerate-1 125.10>99.00 22 125.10>89.00 22
alpha-Endosulfan 240.90>205.90 14 238.90>203.90 16 tau-Fluvarlinate-1 250.10>200.10 16 250.10>55.00 18
Mepanipyrim 222.20>220.10 8 222.20>193.10 26 Fenvalerate-2 125.10>99.00 22 125.10>89.00 22
Profenofos 337.10>266.80 16 207.90>63.00 26 tau-Fluvarlinate-2 250.10>200.10 16 250.10>55.00 18
Myclobutanil 179.10>152.00 8 179.10>125.00 16 Deltam ethrin-1 252.90>93.10 18 181.10>152.10 24
Flusilazole 233.10>165.10 18 233.10>152.10 18 Deltam ethrin-2 252.90>93.10 18 181.10>152.10 24
97
4.5 Scan/MRM Analysis of Residual Pesticides in Foods (2) - GC/MS/MS
QResults
An example of the results of the analysis of the analytical utilizing the Compound Composer Database Software (P/N: 225-
standards (0.001 mg/L to 0.1 mg/L) and the pesticide-spiked 13106-92). The simultaneous analysis database software contains
samples (0.01 mg/L) in scan/MRM mode are shown in Fig. 4.5.1. information (mass spectra, retention times, and calibration
As with Procymidone, shown in Fig. 4.5.1, strict quanti cation of curves) on more than 450 pesticides. As a result, it is possible to
the targeted pesticides could be performed by creating calibration identify pesticides from their estimated retention times and mass
curves from the MRM data. Furthermore, since the scan data was spectra without using analytical standards, and then calculate
sampled simultaneously, the pesticides could be con rmed from semi-quantitative values from the calibration curves. Also in this
the mass spectrum. investigation, it was possible to con rm the detection and semi-
For the untargeted pesticides, data analysis was performed quanti cation of untargeted pesticides such as Quinoxyfen.
3.0
Scan chromatogram
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
MRM chromatogram
24.0 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5
(×10,000)
237.00 2.0
2.0 %
100 237
1.0
1.5
50
1.0 181 272 0.0
198 307
617588103 243 286 328 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 Conc. ratio
0 %
0.5 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 237
100
98
Residual Pesticides
QAnalytical Conditions
Instruments : GCMS-QP2010 Ultra with Twin Line MS System
Column 1 : Rxi-5Sil MS (30 mL., 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm) (Restek Corporation, P/N: 13623)
Column 2 : Rtx-200MS (30 m L., 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm) (Restek Corporation, P/N: 15623)
Glass Insert : Sky Liner, Splitless Single Taper Gooseneck w/Wool (Restek Corporation, P/N: 567366)
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Interface Temp. : 300 °C
Column Temp. : 60 °C (1 min) - (25 °C/min) - 160 °C - (4 °C/min) Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
- 240 °C - (10 °C/min) - 290 °C (11 min) Solvent Elution Time : 1.5 min
Injection Mode : Splitless Measurement Mode : FAAST (Scan/SIM simultaneous
High-Pressure Injection : 250 kPa (1.5 min) measurement)
Carrier Gas Control : Linear velocity (40.0 cm/sec) Scan Mass Range : m/z 50 to 600
Injection Volume : 2 μL Scan Event Time : 0.15 sec
Scan Speed : 5,000 u/sec
SIM Event Time : 0.3 sec
99
4.6 Screening of Residual Pesticides in Food with Two
Different Columns (2) - GC/MS
QAnalysis Results
The pesticide-spiked samples (10 ng/mL) were analyzed the co-eluting contaminants were chromatographically
using the Twin Line MS and the data were processed separated from Carbaryl and Aldrin peaks (Fig. 4.6.2
utilizing the Quick-DB. Figs. 4.6.2, Figs. 4.6.3, and and Fig. 4.6.3 (right side)), and the semi-quantitative
Figs. 4.6.4 show the obtained mass chromatograms for 3 values were much more closer to 10 ng/ mL spike
selected compounds. The left shows those run on the Rxi- levels. Pyrimethanil were not impacted by co-eluting
5Sil MS and the right shows those on the Rtx-200 MS. contaminants with either of the columns. The results
Carbaryl and Aldrin peaks were impacted by close- or obtained from two different columns enhances the
co-eluting contaminants on the Rxi-5Sil MS (Fig. 4.6.2 reliability of screening results. These results demonstrated
and Fig. 4.6.3 (left side)). For these two compounds, the that the Twin Line MS allows the reliable determination of
calculated semi-quantitative values obtained from the pesticides in complex samples with the potential for matrix
calibration curves stored in the Quick-DB were higher interference, such as processed foods. This works for a
than the spike amount (10.0 ng/ mL) because of the semi-quantitative values using the Quick-DB.
interference. However, on the Rtx-200MS (on the right),
Carbaryl
(×10,000) (×10,000)
144.10 144.10
Quantitative value: Quantitative value:
2.5 115.10 13.8 ng/mL 2.5 115.10 10.6 ng/mL
116.10 116.10
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
Fig. 4.6.2 Mass Chromatogram of Carbaryl (10 ng/mL) Added to Liquid Soya Beans Extract (Left: Rxi-5Sil MS; Right: Rtx-200 MS)
Aldrin
(×1,000) (×1,000)
262.90 262.90
Quantitative value: Quantitative value:
264.90 264.90
17.3 ng/mL 5.0 9.3 ng/mL
7.5 293.00 293.00
4.0
5.0
3.0
2.5 2.0
1.0
15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 16.0 16.1 10.75 11.00 11.25 11.50
Fig. 4.6.3 Mass Chromatogram of Aldrin (10 ng/mL) Added to Liquid Orange Extract (Left: Rxi-5Sil MS; Right: Rtx-200 MS)
Pyrimethanil
(×10,000) (×10,000)
6.0 198.10 198.10
199.10 Quantitative value: Quantitative value:
5.0 200.10 9.5 ng/mL 6.0 199.10 10.2 ng/mL
200.10
5.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0 1.0
Fig. 4.6.4 Mass Chromatogram of Pyrimethanil (10 ng/mL) Added to Liquid Soya Beans Extract (Left: Rxi-5Sil MS; Right: Rtx-200MS)
100
Residual Pesticides
Q Experimental
Using the Restek Q-sep TM , commercially-available retort- analysis under the analysis conditions registered in Quick-
pouch curry was pretreated via the QuEChERS method. DB. The two columns indicated in Analytical Conditions were
The sample solution obtained was spiked with 230 standard installed to a single GC-MS with the Twin Line MS system. The
pesticide samples at a concentration of 10 ng/mL. The retention times for the pesticide components were estimated
pesticide-spiked samples were then subjected to Scan/MRM based on the analysis results for the n-alkane standard sample.
QAnalytical Conditions
Instrument : GCMS-TQ8030 (Twin Line MS System)
Column 1 : Rxi-5Sil MS (30 m L., 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm) (Restek Corporation, P/N: 13623)
Column 2 : Rtx-200MS (30 m L., 0.25 mm I.D., df = 0.25 μm) (Restek Corporation, P/N: 15623)
Glass Insert : Sky Liner, Splitless Single Taper Gooseneck w/Wool (Restek Corporation, P/N: 567366)
[GC] [MS]
Injection Temp. : 250 °C Interface Temp. : 300 °C
Column Temp. : 60 °C (1 min) - (25 °C/min) - 160 °C - (4 °C/min) Ion Source Temp. : 200 °C
- 240 °C - (10 °C/min) - 290 °C (11 min) Solvent Elution Time : 1.5 min
Injection Mode : Splitless Measurement Mode : FAAST
High Pressure Injection : 250 kPa (1.5 min) (Scan/MRM simultaneous
Carrier Gas Control : Linear velocity (40.0 cm/sec) measurement)
Injection Volume : 2 μL Scan Event Time : 0.15 sec
Scan Mass Range : m/z 50 to 330
Scan Speed : 5,000 u/sec
QAnalysis Results
The liquid food extract spiked with pesticides was semi-quantitative values with respect to the additive
analyzed, and data processing was performed with concentration. Then the pesticides were classified into
Quick-DB. The analysis results are shown in Fig. 4.7.1. those with a ratio under 50 %, 50 % to 200 %, and over
When semi-quantitative analysis was performed using 200 %, to nd the distribution. The results are shown in
the calibration curves registered in Quick-DB, favorable Fig. 4.7.2. A signi cant 83 % of components had a semi-
semi-quantitative values were obtained, close to the quantitative value 50 % to 200 % that of the concentration
additive concentration of 10 ng/mL for many of the of the standard pesticide samples added. From this, it is
components. To evaluate the quantitative accuracy for evident that semi-quantitative analysis can be performed
this analysis method, ratios were calculated for the with high accuracy.
101
4.7 Easy Screening for Residual Pesticides in Processed
Foods (2) - GC/MS/MS
6% 11 %
(14 compounds) (24 compounds)
83 %
(192 compounds)
Fig. 4.7.1 Analysis Results for the Pesticide-Spiked Samples Fig. 4.7.2 Percentage Distribution of Semi-Quantitative Values
(10 ng/mL concentration) with Respect to the Additive Concentration
In the analysis of residual pesticides in foods, when dimethoate. With the Rxi-5Sil MS, there was an impact
pesticide peaks are detected, it is necessary to check from contaminants, but with the Rtx-200MS, there was
whether contaminants have been misidentif ied as not. Semi-quantitative value obtained from the calibration
pesticides, and whether contaminant overlap has in ated curves registered in Quick-DB was favorable, 9.6 ng/mL,
the size of the quantitative values. One confirmation for the use of the Rtx-200MS column. In this way, even
method is to analyze the samples with columns with for pesticides of which separation from contaminants
different separation patter ns, and then check that is dif cult, separation is possible if using columns with
essentially the same quantitative values are obtained different separation patterns, enabling highly reliable
for the pesticides detected in the respective columns. semi-quantitative analysis.
As an example, Fig. 4.7.3 shows the analysis results for
(×1,000) (×1,000)
143.00>111.00 1.50 143.00>111.00
1.25 125.00>79.00 125.00>79.00
1.25
1.00
1.00
0.75 0.75 Quantitative Value
9.6 ng/mL
0.50 0.50
0.25 0.25
Fig. 4.7.3 Chromatograms for Liquid Curry Extract, Spiked with Dimethoate (10 ng/mL Concentration)
(Left: Rxi-5Sil MS; Right: Rtx-200MS)
High-accuracy semi-quantitative analysis was achieved quickly and easily, by attaching two columns to the GCMS-
TQ8030 utilizing the Twin Line MS system, and then screening for residual pesticides in processed foods using Quick-DB.
102
Residual Pesticides
cps
×10000 area
×10000 area
Fig. 4.8.1 Chromatogram of Orange Juice Spiked with 1 ppb Carbendazim and Calibration Curve
103
4.8 High Throughput LC-MS/MS Analysis of Carbendazim in
Orange Juice (2) - LC/MS/MS
Table 4.8.1 shows the levels of carbendazim measured in different orange juice brands. Fig. 4.8.2 is the chromatogram of
an orange juice matrix blank injected after 1 ppm standard. Fig. 4.8.3 and Fig. 4.8.4 are representative chromatograms
of two brands of orange juice. The MM brand contained 8.1 ppb carbendazim, while none was detected in the certi ed
organic orange juice.
retention time
cps cps
Fig. 4.8.3 Chromatogram of Brand MM Orange Juice Fig. 4.8.4 Chromatogram of Certi ed Organic Orange Juice
QConclusion
Carbendazim was detected in four commercial brands of orange juice at low ppb levels. Levels found were below
FDA limits for a positive test. The calibration curve was linear up to 500 ppb, and the method was sensitive enough to
detect carbendazim below the most stringent regulatory threshold. No carryover was detected and the method run time
was under one minute, thanks to the extremely high speed autosampler which completed each injection cycle in just 7
seconds. Sample preparation only required dilution and ltration for rapid, ef cient analysis.
104
Cd
Ca
Pb
5. Inorganic Metals
5.1 Measurement of Lead in Sugar (1) - AA
nitric acid to bring the volume to 5 mL. 8 2500 2 STEP REGULAR 1.00
7* Atomization stage
Graphite tube: Pyrolysis tube
105
5.1 Measurement of Lead in Sugar (2) - AA
QResults
The measurement results were under the quantitation
limit. Fig. 5.1.1 shows an overlay of some typical peak
profiles, and Fig. 5.1.2 shows the calibration curve
using the blank solution. The quantitation limit in this
measurement is 0.2 ppb for the concentration in aqueous
solution, which converts to 0.03 ppm in the solid sample.
This easily satis es the criterion value of 0.5 ppm.
Addition
concentration
Blank
Time (sec)
106
Cd
Pb
Inorganic Metals
Ca
107
5.2 Measurement of Minerals in Dietary Supplements (2) - AA
108
Cd
Pb
Inorganic Metals
Ca
109
5.3 Measurement of Cadmium and Lead in Food Additives (2) - AA
Abs
0.18
0.16
0.14
Absorbance
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 5 10 15 20
Nitric Acid Concentration (%) Fig. 5.3.4 Calibration Curve of Cd
110
Cd
Pb
Inorganic Metals
Ca
111
5.4 Measurement of Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb) in Pet Food (2) - AA
Abs Abs
Table 5.4.3 Atomizing Parameters for ETAAS Pb
Cd
Cd Pb
Ashing temperature 600 °C 900 °C
Atomizing temperature 2200 °C 2400 °C
Standard solution
0.5, 1.0, 2.0 5, 10, 20
oncentration (ppb)
Tube type Platform
0DWUL[PRGLÀHU 5 ѥL of 100 ppm palladium nitrate
UnSpiked UnSpiked
QResults and Conclusion
Table 5.4.5 shows the sample measurement results. The
values were converted to indicate the concentrations in
0 3 sec 0 3 sec
the solid sample. Table 5.4.6 shows the lower limits of
quantitation. The calculated concentrations in the solid Fig. 5.4.5 Peak Pro les of Sample and Spiked Sample by ETAAS
sample are based on the absorbance values of 0.01 Abs and
0.004 Abs obtained using the Electrothermal and Flame The measurement results obtained using microwave
methods, respectively. Fig. 5.4.4 and Fig. 5.4.5 show the digestion – electrothermal atomic absorption were in
calibration curves and measurement solution peak pro les good agreement with the measurement results obtained
by the Electrothermal method. by the method prescribed in the Test Method for Pet
Animal Feed, and excellent spike and recovery results
were also obtained. Further, compared to the dry ashing
Table 5.4.5 Measurement Results for Cd and Pb in Dog Food
– solvent extraction pretreatment operations, preparation
Element Cd Pb of the measurement solution by microwave digestion can
Reference value 1 ppm or less 3 ppm or less
be accomplished more quickly, and combined with the
electrothermal absorption method using the AA-7000,
Electrothermal method 0.19 ppm (94 % ) 0.26 ppm (106 % )
heavy metals could be analyzed with high sensitivity. Not
Flame method 0.20 ppm < 0.3 ppm only does the AA-7000 support analysis by the ame and
Values in parentheses indicate spike/recovery rate. electrothermal methods, the lineup includes a model that
permits automated switching between both atomization
methods to accommodate a wide range of requirements.
112
Cd
Pb
Inorganic Metals
Ca
Cool
113
5.5 Measurement of Cadmium in Brown Rice (2) - AA
Q Measurement Results
Abs
Table 5.5.3 shows the sample measurement results. At a
Blank 0.2 ppb 0.4 ppb 0.6 ppb 0.8 ppb
low concentration of 1/10 the standard value, excellent
results were obtained for both concent ration and
repeatability.
Fig. 5.5.2 and Fig. 5.5.3 show the calibration curve
and segments of the standard solution peak profiles,
respectively.
Fig. 5.5.4 shows the peak profiles of the respective
samples.
r=0.9997
Abs=0.1961 × Conc+0.00156 0 2 0 2 0 2 (sec)
0 2 0 2 0 2 (sec)
Fig. 5.5.2 Calibration Curve Fig. 5.5.4 Peak Pro les of Samples
[References]
1) Shimadzu Application News No. A427 “Determination of Cadmium in Brown Rice by Flame Atomic Absorption” (2010)
2) Shimadzu Application News No. J87 “Multi-Element Simultaneous Determination of Nutrients as well as Hazardous Elements in
Brown Rice by ICPE-9000” (2007)
114
6. Toxin Inorganic Poison
$QDO\VLVRI'LDUUKHWLF6KHOO¿VK3RLVRQ'63- LC/MS
Q Explanation
Diarrhetic Shellfish Poison (DSP) is a substance that groups, their analysis is dif cult. In Japan, DSP is of cially
accumulates in the digestive gland of the shellfish when analyzed by a bioassay method called the mouse unit method.
they ingest poisonous planktons such as Dinophysis However, HPLC analysis combined with f luorescence
fortii or Dinophysis acuminata. When humans ingest derivatization is also applicable.
shell sh affected by DSP, they suffer acute gastroenteritis Introduced here is an example of analysis of OA, DTX-1 and
accompanied by such symptoms as vomiting, diarrhea and PTX-6 (Fig. 6.1.1) using LC/MS. The ESI mass spectra of the
stomachache. Although the amount ingested normally does positive and negative ions of OA were shown in Fig. 6.1.2.
not lead to death in humans, it is known that DSP does not In the negative ion ESI method, the deprotonated molecule
decompose at normal household cooking temperatures. (M-H) – is clearly detected. In the positive ion spectrum, the
Typical DSP includes Okadaic acid (OA), Dinophysistoxin molecule with the attached sodium ion (M+Na)+, as well as
(DTX), Pectenotoxin (PTX), and Yessotoxin. Since they fragment ions where 1 - 4 water molecules have detached
have complex structures and no suitable chromophore from the protonated molecule, are detected.
Fig. 6.1.1 Structures of Okadaic Aid (OA), Dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX-1) and Pectenotoxin-6 (PTX-6)
Inten.(×100,000)
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Inten.(×100,000)
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Fig. 6.1.2 Positive and Negative ESI Mass Spectra of Okadaic Aid (OA)
115
$QDO\VLVRI'LDUUKHWLF6KHOO¿VK3RLVRQ'63- LC/MS
The results of selected ion monitoring (SIM) analysis using ion detection). As for PTX-6, the sensitivity decreases to
m/z of the deprotonated molecule (M-H) – in the negative about one-fifth in the negative ion detection compared to
ion detection and m/z of the sodium ion-added molecule the positive ion detection, and PTX has isomers that do not
(M+Na)+ in the positive ion detection yielded good linearity contain carboxylic acid. Although these factors make the
in the concentration range of 13-1625 ng/mL, with a spectrum comparatively complex, positive ion detection is
quantitation limit of 13 ng/mL (excluding PTX-6 in negative more suitable when PTX needs to be analyzed.
(×1,000,000)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0
(×100,000)
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0
Fig. 6.1.3 SIM Chromatograms of DSP using Positive and Negative ESI
QAnalytical Conditions
Column : 6KLPSDFN932'6PP/ðPP,'
Mobile Phase A : 5 mmol/L Ammonium Acetate + 0.1 % Formic Acid-Water
Mobile Phase B : Acetonitrile
Gradient Elution Method
Time Program : %PLQńPLQ
Flowrate : 0.2 mL/min
Column Temp. : 40 °C
Injection Volume : ƫ/
Probe Voltage : N9(6,1HJDWLYH0RGH N9(6,3RVLWLYH0RGH
Nebulizer Gas Flow : 1.5 L/min ł
Drying Gas Pressure : 0.2 MPa ł
CDL Temp. : 200 °C ł
Block Heater Temp. : 200 °C ł
CDL & Q-array Voltage : Using default values ł
SIM : m/z 803.25, 887.15, 817.25 for Negative Mode
m/z 906.25, 911.15, 634.25, 850.30, 827.20, 864.30, 841.20 for Positive Mode
116
Toxin Inorganic Poison
+LJK6SHHG$QDO\VLVRI$ÀDWR[LQVLQ)RRG- LC
0.000
Although an injection volume of 8 μL was used in the 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 min
analysis shown in Fig. 6.2.1, we investigated the peak
shapes and separation performance using larger sample Fig. 6.2.1 Chromatogram of a Standard Mixture of A atoxins
(8 μL injected)
injection volumes for analyses at even lower trace levels.
Fig. 6.2.2 shows the chromatograms of the same standard
mixture of 4 a atoxins used in the analysis of Fig. 6.2.1, mV
1.00
but with injection volumes of 8 μL, 30 μL, and 50 μL, Peaks 8 μL
respectively. Even with a 50 μL injection volume, good Same as Fig. 6.2.1 30 μL
50 μL
separation was obtained without any degradation of peak 0.80
3
shape. The detection limits (with SN ratio = 3.3) using the
50 μL injection were 1 ng/L (1 ppt) for a atoxin B1, and 0.60
2 ng/L (2 ppt) for a atoxin G1. 1
0.40
4
0.20 2
117
+LJK6SHHG$QDO\VLVRI$ÀDWR[LQVLQ)RRG- LC
1.100 Fraction
1.050
Peak Height Ratio
1.000 (1 mL)
0.950
0.900 B1 Evaporation by N2 gas
0.850 B2 0.5 mL Water / Acetonitrile = 9/1(v/v)
0.800
G1
0.750 Sample solution
G2
0.700
20 ˚C 25 ˚C 30 ˚C 35 ˚C 40 ˚C
Cell Temperature (˚C) Fig. 6.2.4 Sample Preparation
Fig. 6.2.3 Relationship between Cell Temperature and Peak Height Ratio
Unspiked
0
118
Toxin Inorganic Poison
Q Explanation Q'HULYDWL]DWLRQRI$ÀDWR[LQVZLWK7ULÀXRURDFHWLF$FLG
A atoxins are toxins produced by the fungus Aspergillus. Typically, af latoxins B1 and G1 are converted to the
In addition to being acutely toxic, they are also known hydroxyl-derivative af latoxins B 2a and G 2a using
to be carcinogenic, so their inspection in foods is tri uoroacetic acid (TFA) to increase their uorescence
necessary1). Up to now, a atoxin B1 is the only a atoxin intensity in HPLC analysis. Fig. 6.3.1 shows the structures
that has been regulated in Japan. However, beginning of the 4 aflatoxins and those of the B2a and G 2a TFA
October 2011, the restriction extends to the total of derivatives.When analyzing af latoxins in food, TFA
a atoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2.2). derivatization is done for both the standard solution and
Here, we introduce two cases of analysis of these 4 the sample solution.
aflatoxins (B1, B2 , G1, G 2), using the Prominence RF-
20A XS high-sensitivity f luorescence detector, first
by f luorescence detection using trif luoroacetic acid
derivatization, and then direct detection without TFA
derivatization.
O O O
O O O
O HO O O
O O O
O TFA O
O O O O
CH3 CH3 CH3
Aflatoxin B1 Aflatoxin B2a Aflatoxin B2
O O O O O O
O O HO O O O O
O O O
TFA O O
O O O O
CH3 CH3 CH3
Aflatoxin G1 Aflatoxin G2a Aflatoxin G2
Fig. 6.3.1 Structures of A atoxins B1, B2, G1, G2, and Tri uoroacetic Acid-Derivatized Forms (B2a, G2a)
119
6.3 $QDO\VLVRI$ÀDWR[LQ%1, B2, G1 and G2 at High Sensitivity (2) - LC
mV µV
30.0 Peaks Peaks
1 400
1. Aflatoxin B2a (B1) : 2.0 µg/L 1. Aflatoxin B2a (B1) : 20 ng/L
2. Aflatoxin B2 : 0.5 µg/L 2. Aflatoxin B2 : 5 ng/L
25.0 1
3. Aflatoxin G2a (G1) : 2.0 µg/L 3. Aflatoxin G2a (G1): 20 ng/L
4. Aflatoxin G2 : 0.5 µg/L 300 4. Aflatoxin G2 : 5 ng/L
20.0
3 3
15.0 200
10.0 2
100 4 2
4
5.00
0
0.00
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 min 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 min
Fig. 6.3.3 Chromatograms of A atoxin Standard Solutions After Derivatization with Tri uoroacetic Acid (20 μL injected)
(Left) B1 and G1: 2.0 μg/L, B2 and G2: 0.5 μg/L, (Right) B1 and G1: 20 ng/L, B2 and G2: 5 ng/L
QAnalysis of Standard Solution by Direct Detection
Fig. 6.3.4 shows chromatograms of standard solutions of the 4 a atoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2) obtained with 20 μL injections,
without TFA derivatization. The analytical conditions were the same as those shown on this page. Regarding the B1 peak
in the chromatogram on the right in Fig. 6.3.4, a peak area repeatability (n=6) of 2.7 %RSD was obtained, and the detection
limit (S/N ratio=3.3, 20 μL injection) was calculated to be 3 ng/L (60 fg). This demonstrated that testing for a atoxin B1
and G1 can be done with suf cient sensitivity using direct detection with the RF-20A XS, without TFA derivatization.
mV μV
8.00 Peaks 2 Peaks 2
1. Aflatoxin B1 : 2.0 μg/L 1. Aflatoxin B1: 20 ng/L
2. Aflatoxin B2 : 0.5 μg/L 2. Aflatoxin B2: 5 ng/L
3. Aflatoxin G1 : 2.0 μg/L 60.0 3. Aflatoxin G1: 20 ng/L
4
6.00 4. Aflatoxin G2 : 0.5 μg/L 4 4. Aflatoxin G2: 5 ng/L
1
1 40.0
4.00
3
3 20.0
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 min
Fig. 6.3.4 Chromatograms of A atoxin Standard Solutions by Direct Detection (20 μL injected)
(Left) B1 and G1: 2.0 μg/L, B2 and G2: 0.5 μg/L, (Right) B1 and G1: 20 ng/L, B2 and G2: 5 ng/L
120
Toxin Inorganic Poison
QAnalysis of Food mV
For a food application example, a atoxin standard solution Peaks
was added to commercially available corn our so that the 1. Aflatoxin B2a (B1)
12.5 2. Aflatoxin B2
respective a atoxin concentrations in the sample became 0.8 3. Aflatoxin G2a (G1)
μg/kg for B1 and G1, and 0.2 μg/kg for B2 and G2. The pseudo 4. Aflatoxin G2
contaminated sample was then analyzed. Fig. 6.3.5 shows 10.0
the sample preparation procedure. The contaminants were
1
removed using a multifunctional column. 7.5
Analysis was conducted using both TFA derivatization and
direct detection without derivatization. Fig. 6.3.6 shows the 3
5.0
chromatograms obtained from analysis of commercially
available corn flour that was spiked and unspiked (blank) 4
2
Sample 50 g
Fig. 6.3.6 Chromatograms of Corn Flour Using Derivatization with
(Aflatoxin Standard Solution) TFA (20 μL injected)
200 mL Water / Acetonitrile = 1/9 (v/v) (Upper) Spiked with A atoxin Standard, (Lower) Unspiked
Placed in dark room and
maintained at ambient temperature for 5 minutes
mV
121
6.4 High Speed Analysis of Nivalenol and Deoxynivalenol (1) - LC
122
Toxin Inorganic Poison
Sample 50 g
[References]
1) “Test Method for Deoxynivalenol” (Food Safety Noti cation No. 071702, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, July 17, 2003, Japan)
2) “Provisional Standard Criteria Value for Deoxynivalenol” (Food Safety Noti cation No. 0521001, Ministry of Health, Labour and
Welfare, May 21, 2002, Japan)
123
6.5 Analysis of Arsenic in Foods (1) - EDX
Analyte Result Std. Dev. Calculation Line Intensity Analyte Result Std. Dev. Calculation Line Intensity
AS 0.390 % 0.002 Quant.-FP AsKa 76.119 AS 0.352 % 0.002 Quant.-FP AsKa 69.052
H2O 99.610 % - Balance - - H2O 99.648 % - Balance - -
Fig. 6.5.1 Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Oolong Tea Fig. 6.5.2 Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Juice
124
Toxin Inorganic Poison
125
7. Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
7.1 High Sensitivity Analysis of 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole in
Wine (1) - GC/MS/MS
Q Introduction
2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) emitted from wine corks samples, or thermal desorption. The HS-20 headspace
can taint wine and cause an objectionable odor. Due sampler includes a trap function that is able to concentrate
to the low threshold value for sensing the odor, highly headspace gases. Here we introduce an example of high-
sensitive measurements are required for monitoring. sensitivity measurement of TCA in wine using an HS-
Conventionally, TCA was measured using methods such trap GC/MS system. The structure of TCA is illustrated in
as purge and trap, which is very effective in concentrating Fig. 7.1.1 and the mass spectrum is shown in Fig. 7.1.2.
%
100
196.9
209.9
50
166.9 198.9
109.0
62.1 73.0 97.0 147.1 160.1 177.0
0
50.0 75.0 100.0 125.0 150.0 175.0 200.0
QAnalytical Conditions
HS-20 GCMS-QP2010 Ultra
Mode : Trap GC Unit
Equilibrating Time : 30 min Column : Rxi-5ms 0.32 mm I.D. × 60 mL., df = 1.0 ѥm
Oven Temp. : 60 °C Column Temp. : 50 °C (1 min) - 10 °C/min - 300 °C (5 min)
Sample Line Temp. : 260 °C Carrier Gas Control : Constant pressure
Transfer Line Temp. : 260 °C Carrier Gas Pressure : 180 kPa
Trap Equilibrating Temp. : 80.0 °C Injection Mode : Splitless
Trap Cooling Temp. : 80.0 °C Sampling Time : 3 min
Trap Desorbing Temp. : 280.0 °C Additional Flow
Vial Pressurizing Time : 2.0 min APC1 : 100 kPa
Pressure Equilibrating Time : 0.1 min APC3 : 50 kPa
Load Time : 0.1 min MS Unit
Load Equilibrating Time : 0.1 min Interface Temp. : 280.0 °C
Dry Purge : 5 min Ion Source Temp. : 230.0 °C
Injection Time : 20 min Solvent Elution Time : 14 min
Needle Flush : 20 min Measurement Start Time : 15 min
Injection Cycle : 3 cycles Measurement End Time : 20 min
Cycle Time : 50 min Measurement Mode : SIM
Sample Loading Volume : 5 mL Selected Ions (m/z) : 211.9, 209.9, 196.9, 194.9
Event Time : 0.2 sec
126
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
1.5
2.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
16.75 17.00 17.25 0 50 Conc.
Fig. 7.1.3 SIM Chromatogram of TCA in Wine Measured Using HS-Trap
(Wine spiked with 1 ng/L TCA) Fig. 7.1.6 Linearity of TCA (Wine spiked with 1-100 ng/L TCA)
(×1,000)
211.90 Table 7.1.1 Area Repeatability of TCA ( n=5, wine spiked with 3 ng/L TCA)
209.90
2.0 AREA 1 2 3 4 5 Average %RSD
TCA
3,103 3,051 2,925 3,020 2,742 2,968 4.79 %
1.5 m/z 211.9
1.0
QConclusion
0.5 We presented here an example of high-sensitivity
16.75 17.00 17.25
measurement of trichloroanisole in wine using an HS-
trap GC/MS system. The results showed that the system
Fig. 7.1.4 SIM Chromatogram of TCA in Wine Measured Using
was easily able to measure even a few nanograms per
Conventional Headspace GC/MS
(Wine spiked with 100 ng/L TCA) liter. This also confirmed that an HS-trap-GC/MS
system using the HS-20 headspace sampler is effective in
(×10,000) monitoring trichloroanisole in wine.
3.0 211.90
209.90
2.0
1.0
127
7.2 Rapid Determination of Melamine in Food (1) - LC
mAU
N N
5 Peak
1. Melamine 1
NH2
0 2 4 6 min
128
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
2500
mAU
Peak Area
2000 Q Peak
1. Melamine (Spiked)
1500
1000
0.2 1
500
Milk
0 Spiked at 2 mg/kg
0 25 50 75 100
Concentration (ѥg/L) Milk Blank
0
QPeak
0.6 1. Melamine (Spiked)
Milk 0.5 g Wheat Flour 0.5 g
Add 2 mL Water
Fill up to 10 mL with Methanol
0.4
Shake Wheat Flour
1 Spiked at 2 mg/kg
&HQWULIXJHDWUSPIRUPLQDWÝ&
0.2
Supernatant Residue
Wheat Flour Blank
Dilute Five Times with Water
0
Filtrate with 0.2 ѥm Filter
0 2 4 6 min
HPLC
129
7.3 Analysis of Contaminant Adhering to Frozen Pizza (1)
- FTIR/EDX/EPMA
Q Explanation Table 7.3.1 Instruments and Analytical Conditions
The steady stream of consumer complaints related to Instruments : IRPrestige-21, AIM-8800
foods re ects continuing high concern for food safety. To Resolution : 4 cm-1
address these concerns and speci c contamination-related Accumulation : 45
complaints, it is important to quickly and accurately Apodization : Happ-Genzel
report the analysis results and clearly elucidate the Detector : MCT
contamination pathway. Here, using a Fourier transform
infrared spectrometer (FTIR) and an energy dispersive (2)
X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (EDX), in addition to (5)
an electron probe micro analyzer (EPMA), we present
(1)
the results of analysis of a contaminant adhering to the
surface of frozen pizza.
(3) (4)
QAnalysis by FTIR 1
Some of the foreign substance was scraped off the frozen
pizza, and after rolling it onto the diamond cell, the
infrared spectrum was measured by transmission infrared
microscopy. Measurements were conducted at multiple 0.5 Contaminant 1
sites on the contaminant. Fig. 7.3.2 shows a photograph
indicating the measurement locations, and Fig. 7.3.3
shows the overlaid infrared spectra that were obtained at
Fluorine compound
the respective sites. Measurements were conducted using 0
4000 3000 2000 1500 1000
30 × 30 μm focal regions. The analytical conditions used 1/cm
are shown in Table 7.3.1.
Fig. 7.3.4 Search Result 1
130
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
0.5
QAnalysis by EPMA
Contaminant 5
After scraping off a portion of the contaminant and coating its
0.25 surface with gold, we conducted mapping of each element within
a micro-region measuring 400 × 400 μm. Fig. 7.3.8 shows the
Linseed oil
0 mapping results for the principal elements that were detected.
4000 3000 2000 1500 1000 1/cm The SS constituents Fe and Cr that were detected by EDX were
detected over a wide range. In addition, the F that was detected by
Fig. 7.3.6 Search Result 3 FTIR was detected in a localized perimeter. Thus, the results are
As can be seen from the respective search results, there were consistent with the obtained FTIR and EDX results.
search hits on a uorine compound, starch, and linseed oil. Of
these, the starch and linseed oil are expected components of the
pizza dough. The uorine compound is an industrial product,
and since it is also used in cooking utensils, it is apparently a
contaminant derived from an external source.
QAnalysis by EDX
Analysis of the intact contaminant adhering to the frozen pizza
was conducted using a 3 mm analysis diameter. Fig. 7.3.7 shows
the qualitative results comparing the normal and contaminated
parts of the frozen pizza. In addition, a comparative pro le of the
normal and contaminated sites of Fig. 7.3.7 was calculated, and Fig. 7.3.8 Results of Elements Mapping for Contaminant Part
quantitative analysis of the detected elements was conducted by
the FP method. The obtained results are shown in Table 7.3.2. QConclusion
Complex qualitative analysis using FTIR, EDX and EPMA
was conducted to identify a contaminant adhering to the
surface of frozen pizza, and the results indicated detection of
SS constituents and a uorine compound. EPMA mapping
results indicated that the SS constituents (Fe, Cr) were
scattered over a region of approximately 10 μm. On-site
- Normal Site
veri cation in the actual manufacturing process is essential
- Contaminated Site to identify the source of contamination, but from the
photograph of Fig. 7.3.1, the contaminant appears to be some
type of burnt substance. The above analysis suggested that
the contaminant consists of burnt cooking oil mixed with
a uorine compound originating from a cooking utensil or
Fig. 7.3.7 6C-92U Qualitative Results for Contaminated and Normal Sites manufacturing machine, in addition to SS powder.
131
7.4 Introduction of a Search System for Contaminants in
Tap Water (1) - FTIR/EDX
Q Explanation or absence of metallic luster, and measurement technique
Various contaminants, both organic and inorganic, can be present in pertaining to the contaminant materials are also recorded in
tap water. It is therefore necessary to identify not only contaminants the database. Furthermore, the elemental information obtained
that are organic, but also those that are inorganic in nature. Without from EDX analysis results is also stored in this database, thereby
information on both of these types of contaminants, adequate permitting details to be viewed using the EDX pro le database.
determination is not possible. Here, we present the determination of In addition to the qualitative and quantitative information, the
organic and inorganic contaminants in tap water using both infrared EDX pro le database also includes photographs of the samples.
spectroscopy (FTIR) for analysis of organic substances, and X-ray The procedure for identifying contaminants using the tap water
uorescence analysis (EDX) for inorganic elements. contaminant search system is shown in Fig. 7.4.1. This sequence
we present the analysis of these two types of contaminants in tap is used for analysis regardless of the category of the system
water and introduces how a tap water contaminant search system where the contaminant was discovered. Here, we used the ow
can be utilized for identi cation of the substances. chart scheme to analyze contaminants in tap water.
132
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
Fig. 7.4.4 Qualitative and Quantitative Results for "Drain Fitting Seal" by EDX Search Result
QAnalysis of Inorganic Materials
Next, observation of contaminant B in tap water revealed a powder sample Contaminant B
with metallic luster, suggesting that contaminant B was an inorganic material.
Inorganic contaminants are rst analyzed by EDX, as indicted in the procedure
of Fig. 7.4.1 for Inorganic Samples. The analytical conditions are shown in 4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 1/cm
Table 7.4.2, and a photograph of the instrument used is shown in Fig. 7.4.5. The
EDX analysis results are shown in Fig. 7.4.6. The principal component of this Details of infrared spectrum database search result: "Iron rust_3"
contaminant was detected as Fe, and is assumed to consist of iron rust based on Materials: Iron (Ⅲ) oxide hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) Major elements: Fe, S, Si, P
the quantitative results. In addition, contaminant B was measured by the FTIR Color: Yellow Shape: Sand-shaped Hardness: Soft Metallic luster: No
single re ection ATR method, and the infrared spectrum database was used to Technique: ATR (Ge)
conduct a search, as outlined in procedure (3) of Fig. 7.4.1. The infrared spectrum Fig. 7.4.7 Infrared Spectra and Search Results for Contaminant B
search results are shown in Fig. 7.4.7. These results indicated a similarity of the
contaminant to iron rust. Also, this similarity is supported by the "Iron Rust_3" QConclusion
hit in the FTIR search result using the EDX pro le database. This analysis shows Here, we introduced a tap water contaminant search system using
that tap water contaminants can be identi ed more accurately using the EDX FTIR analysis and EDX analysis. Even when a commercially available
pro le database together with the infrared spectrum database. product is provided with information about materials that are included,
Table 7.4.2 Instrument and Analytical Conditions information related to additives is often not known, making it dif cult
Instrument : EDX-800HS to identify such materials as rubber and plastics. However, the infrared
X-Ray Tube : Rh target spectrum database prepared here includes qualitative information
: IRU&O related not only to principal components but also to additives, in addition
Filter
to elemental information detected by EDX. Also included is a sample
Tube Voltage : >N9@&6F>N9@7L8 database containing information collected from actual contaminants,
Tube Current : Auto as well as cross-section and surface measurements of seals, which
Atmosphere : Vacuum have a relatively high detection rate in tap water. Thus, this system
Measurement Diameter : 1 [mmφ] can be utilized as a contaminant analysis tool not only for tap water-
Measurement Time : >VHF@7L8>VHF@&6F>VHF@&O related utilities, but across a wide range of elds, such as environmental
Dead Time : Max 25 [%] (including contract analysis), petrochemical, and food elds.
133
,GHQWL¿FDWLRQRI&RQWDPLQDQWV$QLPDO+DLU- MCE
Q Explanation
If a contaminant is discovered during the process of
manufacturing foods, medicines, and cosmetics, etc., Specimen (animal hair, etc.)
it is essential to identify the contaminant not only to
clarify the cause or source of the contamination but for DNA extraction
establishing a standard operating procedure to prevent
the recurrence of such contamination as required in
hygiene control. Presumptive inspection of contaminants Purified DNA
is typically conducted by microscopic observation, but
since this requires specialized knowledge and experience, PCR
it is dif cult for inexperienced individuals to make a clear
assessment and to determine the source of contamination,
human or animal. Especially, with respect to animal hair, PCR product
a very common contaminant, it is extremely dif cult to
determine the type of contamination by visual inspection. Electrophoresis
Reliable methodology is therefore required to solve this MultiNA
problem. The Aichi Industrial Technology Institute Food
Research Center has developed a DNA testing method for Identification of animal type
identifying the type of animal associated with specific
hair contaminants(*). The animal species that can now
be detected reliably with this method include 6 types of Fig. 7.5.1 Experimental Procedure for Identi cation of Contaminants
farm animals (cow, pig, chicken, horse, sheep, and goat), 3 (Animal Hair) Using DNA Testing
types of pets (dog, cat, and rabbit), and 3 types of rodents
(sewer rat, black rat, and house mouse), for a total of 12
animal types. Here we introduce examples of analysis of QReagents/Kits
animal types by DNA testing using a combination of the * QIAGEN Fast Cycling PCR Kit
abovementioned method together with Shimadzu’s MCE- (Qiagen) 203743
202 MultiNA microchip electrophoresis system. * Primer Sets for identi cation of animals
(each 12 types) (Bex)
Q Experimental Procedure
* QIAamp DNA Micro Kit
The DNA extraction method and PCR conditions used
(Qiagen) 56304
were in accordance with the “Animal Hair DNA Testing
Protocol”(*) developed by the Aichi Industrial Technology * DNA-500 kit
Institute Food Research Center. The samples used for (Shimadzu Corp.) P/N: 292-27910-91
PCR consisted of DNA samples of cow, pig, chicken, * GelStar® Nucleic Acid Stain
horse, sheep, goat, dog, cat, rabbit, sewer rat, black rat, (Takara Bio) F0535
and house mouse that were kindly provided by the Aichi
* 25 bp DNA Ladder
Industrial Technology Institute Food Research Center.
(Invitrogen) 10597-011
In addition to these, DNA was also extracted from the
hair of 4 breeds of dog (Shiba, chihuahua, corgi, and
Afghan hound), a cat (Norwegian forest cat), and a rabbit
(Lionhead rabbit). Following PCR, the amplified DNA
was subjected to size analysis using the MultiNA. The
animal types were identi ed from the analysis results (See
procedure owchart, Fig. 7.5.1).
134
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
QResults
Fig. 7.5.2 shows the analysis results for the PCR products results of 1 to 12 (Fig. 7.5.2). In addition, with the
of the 12 animal types (cow, pig, chicken, horse, sheep, goat, electrophoresis results of a to f (Fig. 7.5.2), DNAs of lengths
dog, cat, rabbit, sewer rat, black rat, and house mouse) and which can be used to identify the animal types were also
dog breeds (Shiba, chihuahua, corgi, and Afghan hound), detected from the respective hair of dog (Shiba, chihuahua,
cat (Norwegian forest cat), and rabbit (Lionhead rabbit). corgi, and Afghan hound), rabbit (Lionhead rabbit), and cat
Characteristic lengths of PCR products (cow (137 bp), pig (Norwegian forest cat). By combining the use of the Primer
(230 bp), chicken (159 bp), horse (183 bp), sheep (224 bp), goat Sets and the MultiNA microchip electrophoresis system as
(160 bp), rabbit (167 bp), dog (122 bp), cat (220 bp), sewer rat described in this analysis example, contaminants can be
(237 bp), black rat (102 bp), and house mouse (116 bp)) were identified from minute quantities of biological substances
ampli ed for the 12 animal types, respectively. The DNA of such as hair, etc., often discovered in manufacturing
the 12 types of animals was detected from the electrophoresis processes and products.
L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 L a b c d e f
135
7.6 Analysis of Odor in Frozen Shrimp (1) - GC/MS
Q Explanation
The smell of food is an important characteristic related to Packing material
its taste, aroma, and freshness. The headspace technique,
in which the gas released during heating of the sample is
analyzed, has typically been used in the aroma analysis Collection tube
CarbotrapB+Carboxen1000
of foods. The headspace technique usually relies on
heating of the sample to transfer the target substances
to the vapor phase. However, in the case of perishable Nitrogen gas
N2 100mL/min
foods, there is always a danger that heating will cause
Collection time: 5min
sample degeneration. Although the headspace technique
Collection volume: 500mL
can be conducted using a lower heating temperature, this
approach would normally result in reduced sensitivity. An
alternate approach when analyzing samples which could Fig. 7.6.1 Schematic Diagram of Sampling Method
be affected by thermal degradation involves concentrating
the volatilized gas at or near room temperature using
the thermal desorption technique. Here we introduce
an example of analysis of trace quantities of substances Q2. Sample Introduction
volatilized from frozen shrimp at room temperature. Analysis of the volatile odor substances of frozen shrimp
was conducted using the thermal desorption technique.
QAnalysis Outline The thermal desorption technique uses a collection tube
1. Sampling which is connected to the instrument; the collection
Volatile substances were collected. tube, containing volatile substances collected from the
2. Sample introduction sample, is thermally desorbed and introduced into the
Volatile substances were introduced into GC/MS. GC/MS. Since the sample width (bandwidth) of the
3. Data analysis volatile substances widens at the time of desorption from
3.1 Qualitative analysis the collection tube, typically, a secondary trap tube is
Volatile substances were identi ed from their mass installed and the volatile substances are cooled and re-
spectra.
concentrated to narrow the bandwidth, thus achieving
3.2 Quantitative analysis of the generated gas
For each substance identified, a calibration curve higher chromatographic resolution. The analytical
was generated using standard samples of known conditions are shown on next page. Sample introduction
concentration. The volatilized compounds in when using thermal desorption is as illustrated in the
the shrimp samples were calculated using the schematic diagram of Fig. 7.6.2.
calibration curves.
136
Foreign Matters Offensive Odors
Trimethylamine
TIC
750000
11
4
500000
1
250000
10
2
9
876
3
12
13
0
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
137
8. Food Properties
8.1 Melting of Chocolate - TA
'6&
mW
3.39 Ý&
13.99 Ý&
– 2.00
– 4.00
30.44 Ý&
– 6.00
0.00 50.00
7HPS>Ý&@
'6&
mW
2.00
–23.45 J/g
0.00
–11.71 Ý&
7.92 Ý&
– 2.00
16.30 Ý&
19.60 Ý&
– 4.00
– 6.00
0.00 50.00
7HPS>Ý&@
138
Food Properties
DSC
mW
1.00
0.00
Ý&
–1.00
DSC
mW
1.00
0.00
68.90 ÝC
–1.00
40.00 60.00 80.00
7HPS>Ý&@
139
8.3 DSC Measurement of Liquor - TA
'6&
mW
2.00
²Ý&
0.00
– 2.00
²Ý&
– 4.00
²Ý&
²Ý&
– 6.00
–100.00 – 50.00 0.00
7HPS>Ý&@
'6&
mW
0.00 ²Ý&
–88.44 Ý&
²Ý&
–5.00
–10.00
²Ý&
–100.00 0.00
7HPS>Ý&@
'6& '6&
mW mW
1.00 1.00
Ý&
0.00 0.00
42.28 Ý&
Ý& Ý& Ý& Ý&
–1.00 –1.00
Fig. 8.4.1 DSC curve for Fresh Fish Meat Fig. 8.4.3 DSC Curve for Fish Meat after 24 Hours
'6&
mW
1.00
36.97 Ý&
0.00
Ý& Ý&
–1.00
50.00 100.00
7HPS>Ý&@
141
8.5 Protein Denaturation and Texture Analysis for Chicken (1) - TA
'6& DSC
mW mW
1.00
No heat retention
2.00 Ý&
Unheated Heat retained 1 hour Ý&
0.50
Ý& Ý& Ý& Heat retained 2 hours
1.00
Heat retained 4 hours
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
7HPS>Ý&@ 7HPS>Ý&@
Fig. 8.5.1 DSC Curve of Chicken Fig. 8.5.2 DSC Curves of Fried Chicken Subjected to Different
Heat Retention Times
142
Food Properties
Force (N)
25
2 hours
force and time graph. Fig. 8.5.6 shows the definition of 20
parameters used to indicate texture. Hardness is indicated 15
1 hour
by the maximum force first applied, and elasticity is 10
0 min
indicated as a ratio of the recovery times after applying 5
the load twice. Table 8.5.2 shows the hardness and 0
elasticity calculated based on these test results. It is -5
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.5
clear that while the hard-ness rose marginally up to a Time (sec)
heat retention time of 1 hour, the specimen suddenly
becomes harder after heat retention exceeds 2 hours. This Fig. 8.5.4 Relation between Force and Time
also correlates to the DSC measurement result in which
protein denaturation is seen within one hour.
H : Hardness A2
A1
: Cohesiveness
B : Brittleness T2
: Elasticity
T1
C : Adhesive force T2
H × T1 : Gumminess
A3 : Adherence
A2 T2
Force T1 : Dent H × A1 × T1 : Chewiness
Fig. 8.5.3 Photograph of AGS-X System
143
8.6 Texture Analysis of "Soumen" Japanese Vermicelli (1) - TM
Upper grip
Specimen
Lower grip
Fig. 8.6.1 EZ Test Tabletop Tester Fig. 8.6.3 Overview of Tensile Test
144
Food Properties
Fig. 8.6.4 shows the tensile test results as force-displacement (extension) curves. (Curves are superimposed for all ten
specimens.) The results indicate a maximum force of 164 mN and break displacement of 56 mm for Sample A and
120 mN maximum test force and break displacement of 37.8 mm for Sample B. Sample A exhibits greater extension and
strength than Sample B. (All values are averages of ten samples.)
Sample A Sample B
Force (mN)
Force (mN)
QCutting Test
Cutting test can be performed as an evaluation method
that approximates biting through foods. For cutting test,
the specimen is placed on the compression plate and the
cutting test jig (tooth-shape press: R 0.2 mm knife-edge
Cutting test jig
tip) is pressed down on the sample from above. The test (tooth-shape press)
conditions are as follows:
1) Force measurement Load cell (1 N) Specimen
2) Indentation measurement Internal extensomete in tester
3) Test speed 5 mm/min
Compression plate
Fig. 8.6.5 shows a specimen mounted in the tester. Fig. 8.6.5 Overview of Cutting Test
Sample A Sample B
Force (mN)
Force (mN)
145
8.7 Measurement of Texture Characteristics of Rice - TM
20
15
Fig. 8.7.1 Appearance of Texture Analyzer 10
Blended Rice
N Koshihikari
Rice with Barley
Table 8.7.1 Test Piece Making Process 5
146
Food Properties
Q Explanation 1.2
Nowadays people like tender meat more than chewy meat. 1.05
Therefore, various measures are taken to make pork tender, for
0.9
example by soaking it in water or in protein degrading enzyme
solution to quickly achieve an adequate level of tenderness.
3 0.9
2.5 0.75
Test force (N)
2 0.6
1.5 0.45
1
0.3
0.5
0.15
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0
Stroke (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Stroke (mm)
Fig. 8.8.1 Penetrating Test Force-Penetrating Depth Curve on
Store-Bought Boston Pork Butt Fig. 8.8.4 Curve of Pork Soaked in Enzyme Solution for 20 Hours
In these tests, the strength was measured at the point where a
5 mm diameter penetration elasticity jig penetrated a 20 mm
thick cut of Boston Pork Butt to a depth of 10 mm at a speed of
100 mm/min. When the results shown in Fig. 8.8.3 and Fig. 8.8.4
are compared, the jig went deeper into the pork soaked in
enzyme solution for 20 hours as compared to the pork soaked in
water for 20 hours when the same test force was used, indicating
the former is more tender. When Fig. 8.8.1 and Fig. 8.8.3 are
compared, approximately four times the strength is necessary to
penetrate store-bought pork to the same depth as pork soaked in
water for 20 hours, clearly indicating the difference in hardness.
As shown in these gures, the texture of pork was converted
into numerical values from the pork penetrating test strength-
penetrating depth curve. Table 8.8.1 below shows the maximum
penetrating test strength of these three tests.
Table 8.8.1
Fig. 8.8.2 Penetrating Strength Test Being Performed on Pork Average Value of
Sample
Maximum Test Force N
The EZ Test Shimadzu Table-Top Universal Tester was Store-Bought Boston Pork Butt 3.90
used in the test. Fig. 8.8.3 is the penetrating test force- Boston Pork Butt Soaked in Water
0.98
penetrating depth curve of pork soaked in water for 20 for 20 hours
hours. Fig. 8.8.4 shows the results of soaking meat in a Boston Pork Butt Soaked in Enzyme
0.49
protein degrading enzyme solution for 20 hours. Solution for 20 hours
147
8.9 Texture Evaluation of Care Food (1) - TM
Force (N)
0.4
enjoy the pleasures of tasting and eating. Meanwhile,
according to the Health Promotion Law in Japan, 0.2
the Japan Consumer Affairs Agency is authorized to 0.0
conduct reviews of the suitability of "foods for people
with dysphagia" as regulated special purpose foods, and -0.2
based on these reviews, permit the display of such foods. -0.4
Here, we conducted measurements of commercially 0 1 2 3 4 5
available care food based on the test methods specified Time (sec)
for reviewing the suitability of foods for people with
dysphagia. We then classified the food according to Fig. 8.9.2 Food A (vegetable soup)
the specific standard based on the obtained hardness,
adhesiveness, and cohesiveness data.
1.0
QTesting Equipment and Specimens 0.8
The inst r ument used for this evaluation was the
Shimadzu EZ Test Texture Analyzer, with a 5 N test 0.6
force measurement load cell. The samples used consisted
Force (N)
0.4
of 3 commercially available care food products (sample
names: A - C). 0.2
0.0
QTest Conditions
An overview of the measurement setup is shown in -0.2
Fig. 8.9.1. The sample diameter was 40 mm, and the -0.4
sample was loaded to a height of 15 mm in the 20 mm 0 1 2 3 4 5
high sample container. Using a plastic plunger 20 mm Time (sec)
in diameter and 8 mm in height, compression testing
was conducted twice at a speed of 10 mm/sec with a Fig. 8.9.3 Food B (rice gruel)
clearance of 5 mm. The test was conducted using a sample
temperature of 20 °C. 1.0
0.8
0.6
Force (N)
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time (sec)
148
Food Properties
The results obtained from the series of measurements are shown in Table 8.9.1.
Table 8.9.1
Hardness Adhesiveness Cohesiveness
Permissible Standard
Sample Measured Value Measured Value
Judgment Judgment Measured Value Judgment (Overall Judgment)
(N/m2) (J/m3)
Food A 0.84 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.19 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.82 Ⅰ, Ⅱ Ⅲ
Food B 1.97 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.41 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.76 Ⅰ, Ⅱ Ⅲ
Food C 1.88 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.08 × 103 Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ 0.52 Ⅰ, Ⅱ Ⅲ
The measured values for hardness, adhesiveness and would be presumed to be Ⅱ. However, the permissible
cohesiveness that are within the range of the permissible standard becomesⅢ in the nal evaluation, because food
standard are indicated with a □ that surrounds the B and food C contain non-homogeneous ingredients.
standards in the judgment eld. Food A does not satisfy Thus, by de ning the numerical value and comparing it
the hardness standards Ⅰ and Ⅱ, so the permissible with the judgment standards, the judgment can be made as
standard was designated as Ⅲ. In the case of foods B and to which permissible standard it corresponds.
C, item Ⅰ is not satisfied, so the permissible standard
[Reference]
(Permissible Standards of Foods for People with Dysphagia Note 1))
Note 1) Regarding permission to display special usage foods (Excerpted from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Food Safety Noti cation No. 0212001)
*1 Within the permissible range of the standard under conditions of either of ambient temperature or the normal temperature at which eating
takes place.
*2 Homogeneous items (for example, jellied foods)
*3 Homogeneous items (for example, jellied or smooth foods). However, this excludes foods that satisfy permissible standardⅠ.
*4 Includes non-homogeneous foods (for example, rice gruel which is easily clumped or collected, soft paste-like or jellied foods).
However, this excludes foods that satisfy permissible standardⅠor permissible standardⅡ.
149
8.10 Particle Size Distribution Measurement of Chocolate (1) - PT
Q Explanation
There are several possible parameters for expressing particle size analyzer to measure the size distribution of
the taste of a piece of chocolate. For example, it can particles in chocolate. Chocolate is a mixture of cocoa
be described in terms of taste characteristics such mass, which consists of ground cocoa beans mixed with
as sweetness or bitterness, but it is also possible to milk, sugar, cocoa butter, and other ingredients. This can
characterize chocolate in terms of its texture in the be considered as a mixture of various particles in fat.
mouth, for instance, how readily it melts in the mouth. Consequently, the particle size distribution presumably
Included in such parameters is "tongue texture," for varies depending on the dispersion conditions. In this
which particle size distribution provides a potential index example, isopropanol at about 45 °C was used as the
for expressing this parameter in numeric terms. Here dispersant.
we introduce the use of a SALD-2300 laser diffraction
QAnalytical Conditions
Funnel Dispersant : ,VRSURSDQRO&
Dispersing Agent : None
Dispersing Method : Stirred using a magnetic stirrer
Refractive Index : 1.70 - 0.05i
Stroke of
Vertical Motion
Stirring Plate
150
Food Properties
q3 (%)
10 10
9 9
Chocolate B Chocolate C
Normalized Particle Amount (Diff)
8 8
7 7
6 Chocolate A 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0.01 0.06 0.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000 5000
Particle Diameter (μm)
Refractive
File Name Sample ID Sample # Absorbance
Index
1 A A bc ipa st2m 0.10 1.60-0.02i
2 B B bc ipa st2m 0.08 1.60-0.02i
3 C C bc ipa st2m 0.12 1.60-0.02i
151
9. 9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic
Analysis Irradiated Food
,GHQWL¿FDWLRQRI5LFH9DULHWLHVí0&(
152
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
,GHQWL¿FDWLRQRI5LFH9DULHWLHVí0&(
QResults
After conducting 4 sets (sets A, B, C, and D) of multiplex products were determined from electrophoresis analysis
PCR using the rice variety identification kit (Kokken) results of the multiplex PCR of the 4 sets, and the different
with the templates of DNA extracted from the 5 varieties rice varieties were identi ed by comparing the obtained
of rice, the obtained PCR products were analyzed with patterns with the expected pattern of each variety of
the MultiNA. The results are shown in Fig. 9.1.2. Five rice. The tool that automates the pattern comparing is
pairs of primers from set A, 4 pairs from set B, 5 pairs provided by the kit manufacturer. The all patterns of the
from set C, and 5 pairs from set D were used to conduct PCR products obtained from the analysis results using
multiplex PCR. The PCR products obtained with the the MultiNA correspond are consistent with the expected
primer pairs from each set are shown in the respective pattern of each variety. MultiNA is the powerful tool for
control lanes. The appearance patterns for 19 PCR electrophoretic analysis of multiplexed PCR products.
Akitakomachi
Akitakomachi
Hitomebore
Hitomebore
Koshihikari
Koshihikari
Kirara 397
Kirara 397
Kinuhikari
Kinuhikari
Control
Control
Ladder
Ladder
Set A Set B
Akitakomachi
Akitakomachi
Hitomebore
Hitomebore
Koshihikari
Koshihikari
Kirara 397
Kirara 397
Kinuhikari
Kinuhikari
Control
Control
Ladder
Ladder
Set C Set D
Fig. 9.1.2 Analytical Results of Multiplex PCR of Extracted DNA from Rice Using MultiNA
153
9.2 ,GHQWL¿FDWLRQRI7KXQQXVí0&(
PCR products
PCR-RFLP products
MultiNA electrophoresis
154
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
QReagents/Kits QResults
· DNA-500 Kit (Shimadzu) Fig. 9.2.2 shows the results of analysis of the PCR-RFLP
· SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel stain (Invitrogen) products from Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus),
· 25 bp DNA Ladder (Invitrogen) southern blue n tuna (T. maccoyii), Ơ and ơ bigeye tuna (T.
· DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) obesus), yellow n tuna (T. albacares), and albacore tuna (T.
· Alu I (New England Biolabs Japan) R0137S alalunga) by MultiNA. The Atlantic blue n tuna, ơ bigeye
· Mse I (New England Biolabs Japan) R0525S tuna, and albacore tuna show distinctive fragment patterns
· Tsp 509 I (New England Biolabs Japan) R0576S as a result of Alu I restriction enzyme processing, allowing
them to be distinguished (Alu I processing marked with+
in Fig. 9.2.2). However, the southern blue n tuna, Ơ bigeye
tuna, and yellowfin tuna show the same fragmentation
QAnalytical Conditions for PCR-RFLP Products pattern. Therefore, we next performed restriction enzyme
Instrument : MCE-202 "MultiNA" processing using Mse I. The southern blue n tuna showed
Analysis Mode : DNA-500 on-chip mode a distinct fragmentation pattern as a result of restriction
enzyme processing using Mse I, allowing its identi cation
(Mse I processing marked with+ in Fig. 9.2.2). As for the
remaining Ơ bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna, 2 types of
distinct fragmentation patterns were observed as a result of
Tsp 509 I restriction enzyme processing, allowing these to
be easily distinguished (Tsp 509 I processing marked with+
in Fig. 9.2.2). The excellent sensitivity, separation and
repeatability of the analysis data obtained with the MultiNA
demonstrate that it is a powerful and fully automated tool
for determining intra-species genetic variation.
Southern bluefin tuna
α Bigeye tuna
α Bigeye tuna
★α Bigeye tuna
★Albacore tuna
Yellowfin tuna
Yellowfin tuna
★Yellowfin tuna
★β Bigeye tuna
Ladder
Ladder
Ladder
156
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
Fig. 9.3.6 Absorption Spectra of Samples Diluted 1:5 (Thick Line: Beers;
Thin Line: Low-Malt Beers; Dotted Line: Non-Alcoholic Beers)
157
9.3 Spectroscopic Measurement and Multivariate Analysis
IRU&ODVVL¿FDWLRQRI%HHU7\SHVí89
Score
QSummary
1.2
C3 We were able to con f i r m t he possibilit y i n t h is
1
Non-alcoholic
investigation of determining the differences in alcohol
0.8
beer and protein content in beers by examining their
0.6
C1 C4 absorption spectra. Further, by applying multivariate
C2
0.4 Beer A2
analysis to the acquired measurement data, we were able
PC-2 (5 %)
0.2 B4
A1
to classify the groups according to the type of beer, and
0
B5
A3 thereby gain an understanding of their characteristics.
-0.2 B3 A4 Comparative investigation of many products is required
-0.4 in the research and development of food products, but an
Low-malt beer
-0.6
B6 understanding of the degree of similarity among samples
B1
-0.8 B2 is possible using principal component analysis (PCA). The
-1
results obtained in this study suggest that a combination
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 of spectral analysis and multivariate analysis can be
PC-1 (94 %) effective in the development of food products, including
beer.
Fig. 9.3.7 Score Plot
1) The Unscrambler®, a multivariate analysis software application,
Abs. was used for conducting analysis. The Unscrambler is a trademark
1.5 or registered trademark of CAMO.
Regarding the present analysis, principal component analysis
was conducted using mean centering of the acquired data.
2) A score plot involves the projection of each sample point expressed
1.0
in multidimensional space on two loading vectors, expressed as a
two-dimensional graph.
For a description of "loading vector," refer to the following Note 3.
0.5 3) A loading plot refers to the plotting via two-dimensional
coordinates of substances corresponding to the loading
vectors of the rst principal component and second principal
component (or another combination of principal components).
0.0 Here, the loading vector refers to the vector obtained by
230.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0
nm performing eigenvalue calculation for data matrix.
Loading
1400 – 1480 nm
230 – 300 nm
0.1
PC-2 (5 %)
- 0.1
- 0.1 0 0.1
PC-1 (94 %)
158
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
QReagents/Kits
· DNA-500 Kit
(Shimadzu) P/N: 292-27910-91
· SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel stain
(Invitrogen) S-11494
· 25 bp DNA Ladder
(Invitrogen) 10597-011
· QIAGEN Genomic-tip 20/G
(QIAGEN) 10223
159
9.4 Detection of Allergenic Substances (2) í0&(
QResults
The results of analysis of the PCR amplification products same samples as those analyzed with the MultiNA are
of DNA derived from wheat, buckwheat, peanuts, prawn shown in [Reference]. The sizes of the PCR amplification
and crab, respectively, using the MultiNA are shown products are imprecise due to lack of objectivity in
in Fig. 9.4.2. The PCR amplification products derived interpreting the gel electrophoresis results. However,
from the wheat, buckwheat, peanuts, prawn and crab the results obtained using the MultiNA consist of an
substances were all clearly detected using the MultiNA. electropherogram in addition to a gel image, ensuring a
(The estimated sizes shown in the figure were obtained high level of accuracy. Particularly noteworthy is that the
in this experiment. The sizes of PCR-amplified DNA amplification products of wheat and buckwheat are very
indicated in The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare near each other. Compared to agarose gel electrophoresis,
Notification are wheat: 141 bp, buckwheat: 127 bp, the MultiNA’s excellent resolution and sensitivity allow
SHDQXWV ES SUDZQ ES DQG FUDE ES7KH these to be clearly detected.
results of analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis of the
Buckwheat
Buckwheat
Peanuts
Peanuts
Ladder
Wheat
Prawn
Wheat
Prawn
Crab
Crab
Fig. 9.4.2 Analytical Results for PCR Products from Allergenic Substances
Buckwheat
Peanuts
Marker
Marker
Wheat
Prawn
Crab
[Reference]
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of PCR Products from Allergenic Substances
160
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
161
9.5 Detection of Food Poisoning-Related Genes (2) í0&(
Gel Images
L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Lane : Ladder
Lane 1 : Vibrio parahaemolyticus (250 bp)
Lane 2 : Staphylococcus aureus EA (423 bp)
Lane 3 : Staphylococcus aureus TSST-1 (228 bp)
Lane 4 : Salmonella (378 bp)
Lane 5 : E. coli LT (263 bp)
Lane 6 : E. coli STh (131 bp)
Lane 7 : E. coli STp (123 bp)
Lane 8 : E. coli VT1 (349 bp)
Lane 9 : E. coli VT2 (404 bp)
Lane 10 : E. coli VT1&2 (171 bp)
Electropherograms
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
L
162
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
163
9.6 4XDOLWDWLYH$QDO\VLVRI*HQHWLFDOO\0RGL¿HG&RUQí0&(
QReagents/Kits QResults
· DNA-500 Kit From Fig. 9.6.2, it is clear that the endogenous corn gene
(Shimadzu) 66,,EESZDVGHWHFWHGLQDOORIWKHVDPSOHV7KLV
· SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel stain confirms that the DNA extraction and PCR were achieved
(Invitrogen) without problem. On the other hand, only in the samples
· 25 bp DNA Ladder containing the MON 810 maize line could the band (M
ES EH LGHQWLILHG ,Q DGGLWLRQ WKH SUHVHQFH
(Invitrogen)
absence of assumed DNA amplification products was
· DNeasy Plant Maxi Kit confirmed in the positive and negative controls, indicating
(Qiagen) that the results were accurate. Both an electropherogram
and a gel image were obtained in the analysis results
using the MultiNA. Therefore, the amplification products
QAnalytical Conditions for PCR Products of interest were reliably and easily identified by the
Instrument : MCE-202 "MultiNA" presence/absence of peaks and their sizes verified two-
Analysis Mode : DNA-500 on-chip mode dimensionally.
Gel Image
Electropherogram
LM UM
SSIIb Primer
M810 Primer
Fig. 9.6.2 Analytical Results for PCR Products from Genetically Modi ed Corn
164
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
Q Experimental Procedure
Samples consisted of two types of mold and one type
of yeast, as shown in Table 9.7.1. The genus Eurotium
is a type of mold which grows in dried foods, such as Bacterial Culture PCR Reagent PCR
dried goods, bread, filled buns, and jam, etc. The genus
PenicilliumDOVRUHIHUUHGWRDV´EOXHPROGµLVDJHQXV Fig. 9.7.1 Method of Direct PCR
of mold that occurs in many types of food, such as citrus
fruits, grains, and dairy products. There are various types
of Penicillium, ranging from beneficial varieties that
are used in foods such as in the production of cheese,
to harmful types such as toxic mold. Saccharomyces Culture Specimen
cerevisiae is budding yeast, and includes such varieties
as baker’s, wine, and sake yeast. For the PCR reaction
reagent, we used Shimadzu’s “Ampdirect® Plus Enzyme Pretreatment, PCR
6HWµ IRU JHQH DPSOLILFDWLRQ DQG WKH 3&5 UHDFWLRQ Ampdirect ® Plus
conditions used are listed in the included instruction
manual. The mold and yeast that had been cultured in
agar medium were attached to a micropipette tip, then
suspended in the PCR reagent solution, and PCR was PCR Products
conducted (Fig. 3ULPHUV,76SULPHUVIRUIXQJL
GHVLJQHG IRU TXLFN LGHQWLILFDWLRQ RI PLFURRUJDQLVPV
Analysis of PCR Products
E\ JHQHWLF DQDO\VLV DV GHVFULEHG LQ WKH -DSDQHVH
Pharmacopoeia ZHUH XVHG IRU GHWHFWLRQ RI ,76
MultiNA
regions when performing PCR. The PCR products were
DQDO\]HGXVLQJWKH0XOWL1$)LJ
Detection
165
9.7 Detection of Mold and Yeast Genes (2) í0&(
L 1 2 3
3
(x-axis of electropherogram) Migration Time Index (%)
166
9DULHW\,GHQWLÀFDWLRQ Genetic Analysis Irradiated Food
Using commercially-available ground pork as samples, Fig. 9.8.1 Structures of 2-DCB and 2-TCB
one sample was irradiated with 1 kGy of cobalt-60 as
Mix 3 g of sample and 6 g of anhydrous
the Ƣ-ray source under room temperature, and the other Sample sodium sulfate.
was not irradiated. The sample preparation procedure Let stand approximately 30 minutes.
Soxhlet Extraction
is shown in Fig. 9.8.2. SIM measurement is required
Add approximately 120 mL of hexane,
for quantitation in this GC/MS test method, and SCAN reflux and extract for 6 hours.
Add anhydrous sodium sulfate to the lipid
measurement is required for qualitative identification. extract, and let stand overnight.
Here, the measurement was conducted in a single analysis Evaporation
Re-Suspension 200 μL of IS
(0.5 μg/mL 2-cyclohexylcyclohexanone)
GC/MS 1 μL Injection
167
9.8 Detection of Irradiated Foods (2) í*&06
QSample Analysis
The SIM chromatograms of the irradiated and non-irradiated 2) The relative ion intensity ratio of m/z 112 with respect to m/z
samples are shown in Fig. 9.8.3 and Fig. 9.8.4, respectively, 98 is within ± 20 % of the relative intensity ratio of a standard
and the mass spectra of the target analytes in the irradiated solution with a concentration level near that concentration.
samples are shown in Fig. 9.8.5. In the irradiated samples, 3) When SCAN measurement is conducted in the vicinity of the
both 2-DCB and 2-TCB peaks were detected, and their retention time within the range of m/z 95 to m/z 115, m/z 98
concentrations in fat were 0.077 μg/g and 0.151 μg/g, and m/z 112 are the main ions (total intensity of the 2 ions is
respectively. The peaks were not detected in the non-irradiated at least 50 %).
samples. According to the Alkylcyclobutanone Method, 4) Even if the above items are satis ed, the quantitative values
if the following 4 conditions are satisfied, the test result is must be greater than the concentration calculated using S/N
considered to be positive for irradiation of food products. ratio = 3 of the standard solution.
1) Peaks with S/N ratio greater than 3 are recognized at The irradiated food measurement results obtained here
m/z 98 and m/z 112 at the same retention times as in the satisfy all of the above criteria, and therefore the results were
standard solution. “positive” for irradiation.
(× 100,000) (× 100,000)
6.0 98.00 4.0 98.00
112.00 112.00
3.5
5.0
3.0
4.0
2.5
3.0 2.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
(× 1,000,000) (× 100,000)
98.00 8.0 98.00
112.00 112.00
1.00 7.0
6.0
0.75
5.0 2-TCB
4.0
0.50
3.0
2-DCB
2.0
0.25
1.0
% %
100 98 2-DCB 100 98 2-TCB
75 75
50 50
112
25 112 25
99 99
0 0
95.0 97.5 100.0 102.5 105.0 107.5 110.0 112.5 97.5 100.0 102.5 105.0 107.5 110.0 112.5 115.0
A B
168
10. Food Containers Packing
Materials
10.1 Leach Test for Phenol in Rubber Nipples (1)í89
169
10.1 Leach Test for Phenol in Rubber Nipples (2)í89
[Reference]
Author: Yoko Kawamura, "Standards and Criteria for Apparatuses, Containers and Packaging, March 2006 Revision"
Chuohoki Publishing
170
Food Containers Packing Materials
QAnalytical Method
Sa mple pre pa r at ion wa s conduct e d a ccord i ng t o
that specified in the "Food Sanitation Act-Section 3:
Implements, Containers, and Packaging in the Standards
and Criteria for Food and Food Additives, etc." Using Standard solution
a commercially-available food can as the sample, the
Epichlorohydrin
n-pentane dissolved solution was heated in the can at 25 °C
for 1 hour to allow dissolving, and the obtained dissolved
Test solution
solution was used as the test solution. Since epichlorohydrin
and n-pentane evaporate easily, the can was covered with
aluminum foil and polyvinyl chloride wrapping lm, and
the lm was xed in place with a rubber band to seal in the
solution. A RESTEK Rtx-WAX (30 mL, 0.53 mm ID, 1 μm 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 min
lm thickness) was used. The carrier gas owrate was set
so that epichlorohydrin would elute in about 7 minutes. The Fig. 10.2.2 Chromatograms of Epichlorohydrin Standard
sample preparation ow chart is shown in Fig. 10.2.1. Solution and Test Solution
[Reference]
March 31, 2006 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Noti cation No. 201
Food Sanitation Act - Section 3: Implements, Containers, and Packaging in the Standards and Criteria for Food and Food Additives, etc.
171
10.3 Analysis of Triethylamine and Tributylamine in Polycarbonate
Plastics (1) í*&
Q Explanation QAnalytical Conditions
Speci c standards and criteria as well as testing methods Instrument : GC-2010 Plus AF+FTD-2010 Plus
were established for each type of material used in food Column : Rtx-1PðPP,'GI ƫP
packaging materials in the Japan's "Food Sanitation Act Column Temp. : 150 °C (5 min) - 20 °C/min - 250 °C (5 min)
- Section 3: Implements and Container and Packaging Carrier Gas : He 32.5 cm/sec
in the Standards and Criteria for Food and Food &RQVWDQW/LQHDU9HORFLW\0RGH
Additives, etc." Polycarbonate is a transparent plastic Injection Temp. : 200 °C
material which possesses excellent mechanical strength, Injection Method : Split Injection
especially impact resistance and heat resistance. It is Split Ratio : 1:15
Injection Volume : ƫ/
used in a wide variety of utensils in the food industry:
Detector : FTD
nursing bottles, tableware, chopsticks, mugs, and drip
Detector Temp. : 250 °C
coffee makers, to name a few. Individual standards have
been established for testing of specific polycarbonate
constituents, including bisphenol A, diphenyl carbonate,
amines (triethylamine and tributylamine). In addition,
testing procedures have been speci ed for leach testing Sample 1 g
for bisphenol A and residues after evaporation. Here we
introduce an example of analysis of amines (triethylamine Dichloromethane 20 mL
and tributylamine), two of the principle ingredients in
polycarbonate plastic. Dissolve
Acetone 100 mL
QOverview of Triethylamine and Tributylamine
Analysis in Polycarbonate Plastics Centrifugation 3000 rpm for 10 min
This test method consists of dissolving the polycarbonate
a nd ext ra ct i ng a ny exist i ng t r iet hyla m i ne a nd
tributylamine. Measurement of these constituents is then
conducted by Gas Chromatography with a nitrogen-speci c Vacuum concentration Concentrate to about 1 mL
Flame Thermionic Detector (GC-FTD). The test method
consists of verifying that the total content of triethylamine
Add dichloromethane
and tributylamine in the sample does not exceed 1 μg/g.
Test solution 2 mL
QSample Preparation
Sample pretreatment was conducted according to
that specified in the "Food Sanitation Act - Section Fig. 10.3.1 Preparation of Polycarbonate Plastic Sample
3: Implements and Container and Packaging in the (Analysis of Amines)
Standards and Criteria for Food and Food Additives,
etc." A commercially available garlic press made of
polycarbonate was used for the sample. About 1 g of
sample was accurately weighed and transferred to a
200 mL conical ask, and 20 mL of dichloromethane was
then added to the ask. After sample dissolution, 100 mL
acetone was added while mixing well, and centrifugation
at 3000 rpm was conducted for 10 minutes to separate the
phases. After concentrating the supernatant to 1 mL using
a vacuum concentrator, dichloromethane was added to
bring the total volume to 2 mL. This was used as the test
solution. The sample preparation procedure is shown in
the ow chart of Fig. 10.3.1.
172
Food Containers Packing Materials
■ Peaks
1. Triethylamine
2. Tributylamine
2 Standard solution
1
Test solution
Fig. 10.3.3 Chromatograms of Standard Solution (Triethylamine, Tributylamine 0.2 μg/mL each) and Test Solution
Note:
Consumption of the alkali source of the FTD when using dichloromethane as the sample solvent is slightly faster compared to that
when other (hydrocarbon) solvents are used. Details are described in the FTD instruction manual.
[Reference]
March 31, 2006 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Noti cation No. 201
Food Sanitation Act - Section 3: Implements and Container and Packaging in the Standards and Criteria for Food and
Food Additives, etc.
173
10.4 Analysis of Vinylidene Chloride in Polyvinylidene
Chloride Plastics í*&
Q Explanation QAnalysis of Standard Solution and Sample
Specific standards and specifications as well as testing Solution
methods are established for each type of material used in T he ch rom at og r a m s of t he v i nyl ide ne ch lor ide
food packaging materials in Japan's "Food Sanitation Act- standard solution and the test solution prepared from
Section 3: Implements, Containers, and Packaging in the commercially-available household wrapping film, of
Standards and Criteria for Food and Food Additives, etc." which the principle ingredient is polyvinylidene chloride,
Polyvinylidene chloride is a polymer that is transparent, are shown in Fig. 10.4.1. The vinylidene chloride peak in
displays excellent water resistance, chemical resistance, the test solution chromatogram has a smaller peak area
and gas-barrier properties, and is resistant to temperatures than that of the standard solution, confirming that it is
in the range of 140 to 170 °C. In addition to household smaller than the reference value.
wrapping film, it is used as a film for wrapping foods
that have been heated to high temperatures. Vinylidene
chloride is the monomer of polyvinylidene chloride, and QAnalytical Conditions
long-term oral exposure is said to adversely affect the Instruments : TurboMatrix HS-40 + GC-2010PlusAF
liver and kidney. Due to the possibility that vinylidene Column : CP-PoraBOND Q FUSED SILICA
chloride may persist in products, polyvinylidene chloride
PðPP,'GI ƫP
material testing has been established as a separate
standard in the Food Sanitation Act. Here we introduce an Column Temp. : Ý&PLQÝ&PLQÝ&PLQ
example of analysis of vinylidene chloride in plastic Injection Temp. : Ý&
Carrier Gas : He 30 cm/sec
Detector : FID
QAnalytical Method Detector Temp. : Ý&
The vinylidene chloride test method is for measuring Injection Volume : 0.5 mL
vinylidene chloride monomer present in polyvinylidene Sample : Ý&PLQ
chloride by GC/FID using the headspace method. Sample Thermostatting
pretreatment is conducted according to that specified
in the "Food Sanitation Act-Section 3: Implements,
Containers, and Packaging in the Standards and Criteria
for Food and Food Additives, etc." Commercially-
available polyvinylidene chloride household wrapping
lm was used as the sample, and the vinylidene chloride
in the sample was analyzed. A porous polymer PLOT
(porous layer open tubular) CP-PoraBOND Q column
was used. The carrier gas flowrate was set so that the Standard solution
Vinylidene chloride
vinylidene chloride would elute at about 9 minutes.
Following is an overview of the analytical procedure.
(1) Test Solution Preparation
Test solution
Cut and weigh out a 0.5 g fragment of sample, and transfer it
to a headspace vial. Next, add 2.5 mL N,N-dimethylacetamide,
seal the vial, and use this as the test solution.
(2) Standard Solution Preparation
Transfer 50 μL vinylidene chloride standard solution (60 μg/mL) 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 min
to a vial containing 2.5 mL N,N-dimethylacetamide, and seal the
vial. Use this as the standard solution.
(3) Measurement Fig. 10.4.1 Chromatograms of Vinylidene Chloride Standard
Heat the sealed vials of test solution and standard solution for Solution and Test Solution
1 hour at 90 °C, and introduce 0.5 mL of the respective gas
phases into the gas chromatograph. For the gas chromatograph
column, use a 3 μm styrene-divinylbenzene porous polymer-
coated column, and conduct analysis by GC/FID.
(4) Determination [Reference]
Compare the detection times of test solution peak and the
March 31, 2006 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
vinylidene chloride standard solution peak. If the retention
times correspond, compare their respective peak areas. Noti cation No. 201
Verify that the test solution vinylidene chloride peak area Food Sanitation Act - Section 3: Implements, Containers,
is not greater than that of the vinylidene chloride standard and Packaging in the Standards and Criteria for Food and
solution peak area (6 μg/g or less in the material). Food Additives, etc.
174
Food Containers Packing Materials
175
10.6 Analysis of Methyl Methacrylate in Polymethyl Methacrylate
Plastics í*&
Q Explanation QAnalytical Conditions
Due to the high level of concern for food safety, attention is Instrument : GC-2010 Plus AF
being focused on residual organic solvents in food packaging. Column : 5W[PðPP,'GI ƫP
Utensils and food packaging materials are subject to standards Column Temp. : &PLQ&PLQ&
controlled through material testing as specified in Japan's Carrier Gas : He 29.5 cm/sec
Food Sanitation Act-Section 3: Implements, Containers, and &RQVWDQW/LQHDU9HORFLW\0RGH
Packaging in the Standards and Criteria for Food and Food
Injection Temp. : 200 °C
Additives, etc. Polymethyl methacrylate is primarily used in
table articles such as chopsticks, cups, soy sauce dispensers, Injection Method : Split Injection
etc. A separate food packaging standard is provided for the Split Ratio : 1:10
monomer methyl methacrylate. Here we introduce an example Injection Volume : ƫ/
of analysis of methyl methacrylate in plastics in which Detector : FID
polymethyl methacrylate is the main ingredient. Detector Temp. : 200 °C
QOverview of Methyl Methacrylate Analysis QAnalysis of Standard Solution and Test Solution
in Polymethyl Methacrylate Plastics Fig. 10.6.2 shows the chromatograms obtained from
This standard covers mainly polymethyl methacrylate synthetic analysis of a methyl methacrylate standard solution
resins, in which the base polymer consists of at least 50 % (15 μg/mL) and the test solution prepared using a
methyl methacrylate. Polymethyl methacrylate is primarily commercially available chopstick made of polymethyl
used in table articles due to its high transparency, good weather
methacrylate synthetic resin. The peak area value of
resistance and excellent machinability. A separate leachate
testing standard is provided for methyl methacrylate, the methyl methacrylate in the chromatogram test solution is
monomer of polymethyl methacrylate. The methyl methacrylate clearly smaller than that in the standard solution, which
test method speci es the use of GC/FID to measure the amount con rms that the test value satis es the standard criterion.
of methyl methacrylate that leaches from the sample immersed
in a 20 % aqueous ethanol solution. In the leaching test, the
peak area value of methyl methacrylate in the test solution is
not to exceed the peak area value obtained from analysis of a
15 μg/mL methyl methacrylate standard solution.
Sample collection
20% aqueous ethanol solution
(2mL per 1cm2 surface area)
Leaching 60°C, let stand for 30min
GC/FID
Q Explanation
Kitchen utensils and containers regularly come in direct and lead in accordance with ISO. Table 10.7.1 shows the
contact with food articles, and therefore can contaminate revised speci cation standards according to material. The
food with toxic heavy metals, etc. through migration, thus inspection method is a migration test, in which the heavy
posing a health hazard. In particular, ceramic and glass metal is placed in contact with 4 % acetic acid, assuming
tableware may be decorated and coated with pigments and vinegar as the easiest dissolution food substance, for 24
glaze which contain toxic lead and cadmium, and physical hours at ambient temperature to allow migration into
injury due to migration of these toxic elements becomes the acid solution. Quantitative analysis of the solution
a problem. Based on this, the Ministry of Heath, Labour is conducted by atomic absorption spectrophotometry
and Welfare of Japan revised the Food Sanitation Act or ICP emission spectrometry. ICP-AES (ICP emission
"Standards for Foods and Additives" on July 31, 2008 with spectrometry) is a high-sensitivity technique that allows
respect to Noti cation No. 370 of the Ministry of Health, simultaneous analysis of multiple elements. Here we
Labour and Welfare (1959). The main points of revision introduce the analysis of commercial tableware using the
concerning tableware are (1) standardization according Shimadzu ICPE-9000 multi-type emission spectrometer.
to the material, capacity, and shape of containers, and (2)
strengthening of the standard for migration of cadmium
177
10.7 Analysis of Heavy Elements in Tableware (2) í,&3$(6
QResults
Fig. 10.7.1 shows the ICPE-9000 spectral profiles,
and Table 10.7.2 shows the quantitation results and
detection limit of this analysis. The detection limit in
this analysis is less than 1/100 of the standard value,
demonstrating high sensitivity.
Cd 214.438 nm Pb 220.353 nm
1000
700
Standard sample 0.01 ppm
Standard sample 0.25 ppm
600
750 Sample 5
Intensity
Intensity
Sample 5 500
Sample 4 Sample 6
500 Sample 4
400
Sample 2
300
250
200
178
Food Containers Packing Materials
QAnalysis of Cup
The photographs of the cup (Fig. 10.8.1) indicate the
locations where measurement was conducted on the
yellow coating site. The qualitative results of Fig. 10.8.2 (1) (2)
indicate the presence of Pb in the yellow portion of the
cup. In addition, the quantitative analysis results for
the (1) yellow, (2) red, (3) green, and (4) white portions
of coating are shown in Table 10.8.1. The quantitative (3) (4)
analysis results indicate that aside from Pb, the elements
Cr and Cd are also present. Fig. 10.8.1 Photographs of the cup
179
10.9 X-Ray CT Observation of Seals of Food Product Packaging (1)
í1',
Q Explanation
The various types of commercial food product packaging
are designed for ease of use and superior aesthetic design,
while at the same time trying to reduce environmental
impact and ensure or improve safety. Given these design
constraints, the seal portion of packaging is one of the
most technically important areas, where ensuring a
reliable tight seal is extremely important in terms of
safety and quality assurance. Since X-ray CT systems are
able to nondestructively observe the internal structure of
packaging, it is a popular method of observing the seal
status. Therefore, this issue describes several examples
of observing the seal area. In this case, an SMX-100CT-
SV3 Shimadzu Microfocus X-Ray CT System, which is
suitable for objects with relatively low density, was used Fig. 10.9.1 SMX-100CT Shimadzu Microfocus X-Ray CT system
for observations (see Fig. 10.9.1).
After Opening
After Opening
Cap
Seal
Bottle
180
Food Containers Packing Materials
Enlargement of
Adhesion Layer
CT Image 3D Image
Aluminum
Lid
Paper Container
181
10.9 X-Ray CT Observation of Seals of Food Product Packaging (3)
í1',
QObservation of Food Packaging (2)
In addition, the joint area was observed on two types
of containers (cylindrical) similar to the one above (see
diagram in Fig. 10.9.7). Image Location
The observation example in Fig. 10.9.8 shows how the
container is joined by gluing 3 or 4 layers of paper together. Fig. 10.9.7 Image Location
CT Image 3D Image
Adhesive
The example in Fig. 10.9.9 is packaging for food products how there is aluminum foil between layers of paper and
with a high moisture content. The images show in detail how the container surface is coated with polymer.
CT Image 3D Image
Polymer
Aluminum Foil
Paper
Adhesive
182
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
1-Butanol 137 trans-Sabinenehydrate 79
1-Pentanol 86 (Z)-beta-Farnesene 81
1-Propanol 86 (Z)-Chlorfenvinphos 95, 96, 97
1,8-Cineole 79 њ-Acids 35, 37, 38
2-Butanone 86 њ-Cyclodextrin 68, 109, 110
2-Decanone 86 њ-EG 28
2-Dodecylcyclobutanone (2-DCB) 167, 168 ћ-Acids 35, 37
2-Furanmethanol 86 ћ-Alanine 16, 17
2-Heptanol 86 ћ-Carotene 39
2-Heptanone 86 ћ-Caryophyllene 79
2-Hexenal 84 ћ-Cyclodextrin 68, 69
2-Hexenyl Acetate 84 ќ-Caprolactone 86
2-Isopropyl-4-methylthiazole 84 ќ-Cyclodextrin 68, 69
2-Methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine (MIBP) 87, 88 ѝ-Decalactone 86
2-Methylbutanal 86 ѝ-Octalactone 86
2-Methylbutanoic acid 84
2-Methyl-4-propyl-1,3-oxathiane 84 A
2-Nonanol 86 Acesulfame K 66, 67
2-Nonanone 86 Acetaldehyde 86
2-Pentadecanone 86 Acetamide 86
2-Pentenal 86 Acetic acid 11
2-Phenylethyl Isothiocyanate 42 Acetoin 86
2-Tetradecanol 86 Acetol 86
2-Tetradecylcyclobutanone (2-TCB) 167, 168 Acetone 137
2-Tridecanone 86 Acetonitrile 137
2-Undecanol 86 Acid Red 72, 73
2-Undecanone 86 Acrinathrin 95, 96, 97
2,4,6-Trichloroanisole 126, 127 Adenine 22
2,5-Dimethyl-3-ethylpyrazine 86 Adenosine 22
3-Hexenyl Acetate 84 Adhumulone 35, 36, 37, 38
3-MCPD 6, 7 Adlupulone 35, 36, 37
3-MCPD-Dioleoyl Ester 6, 7 ADP 23
3-MCPD-Dipalmitoyl Ester 6, 7 Aflatoxins 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
3-Methylbutanal 86 Aflatoxin B1 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
3-Methylbutanote 86 Aflatoxin B2 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol 6, 7 Aflatoxin B2a 119, 120, 121
3-Penten-2-one 86 Aflatoxin G1 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
5-Methyl-2- (1-methyl-1-sulfanylethyl) cyclohexanone 84 Aflatoxin G2 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
cis-Geraniol 84 Aflatoxin G2a 119, 120, 121
cis-Isoadhumulone 37, 38 Al 131, 133
cis-Isocohumulone 37, 38 Alanine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
cis-Isohumulone 37, 38 Alcoholic Beverage 16, 17, 28
cis-Resveratrol 32 Aldrin 100
D-Isomenthone 79 Alkylcyclobutanone Method 167, 168
D-Limonene 84, 86 Allergenic Substance 159, 160
(E)-Chlorfenvinphos 95, 96, 97 Alliin 29
Iso-њ-Acids 35, 37, 38 Allura Red AC 72, 73
L-Menthone 79 Allyl Isothiocyanate 42
n-Decanoic acid 84 Alpha-aminobutyric acid 12, 13
Neo-Menthol 79 Alpha-Endosulfan 95, 96, 97
n-Propyl Isothiocyanate 42 Alpha-Pinene 81
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid 33 Alpha-Terpineol 81
p-Menthan-2-one 84 Amaranth 72, 73
trans-Geraniol 84 Amino Acids 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
trans-Isoadhumulone 37, 38 AMP 23
trans-Isocohumulone 37, 38 Animal Hair 134, 135
trans-Isohumulone 37, 38 Antioxidants 62, 63, 64, 65
trans-Resveratrol 32 AOAC 90, 92 183
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
AOCS 4, 5 Camphene 81
Arabinose 26, 27 Camphor 81
Arginine 15, 16, 17 Capsaicin 41
Arsenic 111, 124, 125 Capsaicinoids 41
Artificial Colorings 72, 73 Captan 95, 96, 97
As 111, 124, 125, 179 Carbaryl 100
Asahipak NH2P-50 4D 25 Carbendazim 103, 104
Asahipak NH2P-50 4E 24, 28, 68, 69 Carbofuran 94
Ascorbic acid 64 Carbon disulfide 137
Asparagine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Care Food 148, 149
Aspartame 66, 67 Carvone 79
Aspartic acid (ASP) 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Caryophyllene oxide 81
ATP 23, 141 Cat 134, 135
Azo Rubine 73 Catechin (C) 30, 31
Catechin Gallate (CG) 30
B Cd
B1(Brilliant Blue FCF) 72, 73 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 124, 169, 177, 178, 179
B2 (Indigo Carmine) 72, 73 CDP 23
Ba 131, 169, 179 Cellobiose 26, 27
Baby Foods 89, 90, 91, 92 Cereal 21, 103, 122
Beer 17, 24, 35, 37, 38, 156, 157, 158 Cheese 61, 65, 86
Benzaldehyde 84, 86 Chicken 134, 135, 142, 143
Benzoic acid 33, 58, 59, 60 Chloroform 137
Benzoyl Peroxide 82 Chlorogenic Acid 33, 34
Benzyl acetate 84 Chloromethoxymethane 137
Beta-Bisabolene 81 Chlorothalonil 95, 96, 97
Beta-Damascenone 84 Chlorpropham 95, 96, 97
Beta-Endosulfan 95, 96, 97 Chlorpyrifos 95, 96, 97
Beta-Ionone 84 Chlorpyrifos-methyl 95, 96, 97
Beta-Linalool 84 Chocolate 138, 150, 151
Beta-Pinene 81 Cineole 79
BHA 62, 63 Citric acid 11
BHT 62, 63 Citruline 15, 16, 17
Bifenthrin 95, 96, 97 Citrus Juice 51, 52
Bilobalide 46 Citrus Oil 93, 94
Bisdemethoxycurcumin 75, 76 Cl 132, 133
Black PN 73 CMP 23
Black Soybeans 40 Coenzyme Q10 57
Bornyl acetate 81 Cohumulone 35, 36, 37, 38
Brandy 140 Colupulone 35, 36, 37
Brilliant Blue FCF 72, 73 Contaminants 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135
Bromopropylate 95, 96, 97 Corn 129, 139, 163, 164
Brown Rice 113, 114 Cow 134, 135
Buckwheat 159, 160 CP-PoraBOND Q FUSED SILICA 174, 175
Bupirimate 95, 96, 97 Cr 107, 108, 131, 179
Buprofezin 95, 96, 97 Crab 160
Butanal 86 CTP 23
Butanoic acid 86 Cu 107, 108
Butter 3, 62, 63 Curcumin 74, 75, 76
Butyl acetate 84 Curry 77, 101, 102, 124, 125
Cyanidin-3-Glucoside 40
C Cyanocobalamin 20, 21
C
6 131 Cyclodextrin 68, 69, 109, 110
Ca 107, 108, 109, 131, 132, 133 Cyfluthrin 95, 96, 97
Cadmium 109, 110, 111, 113, 114, 124, 177, 178 Cyhalothrin 95, 96, 97
Caffeic Acid 33 Cymene 81
Caffeine 30, 31 Cypermethrin 95, 96, 97
184 Calcium carbonate 132, 133 Cyprodanil 92
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
Cyprodinil 95, 96, 97 Epigallocatechin (EGC) 30
Cys-Cys 15 Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) 30
Cystine 16 Epigallocatechin 3-(3-”O -methyl) gallate (EGCG3M” e) 30
Cytidine 22 Epigallocatechin 3-(4-”O -methyl) gallate (EGCG4M” e) 30
Cytosine 22 Erythorbic acid 64
Erythritol 70, 71
D Erythrosine 72, 73
Daidzein 43 Essential Oil 79
Daidzin 43 ETAAS 109, 111, 112
DB-1 3 Ethanol 137, 157
Decanoic acid 84, 86 Ethion 95, 96, 97
Dehydroacetic Acid 60 Ethofenprox 95, 96, 97
Delta-Decalactone 84 Ethoprophos 95, 96, 97
Delta-Dodecalactone 84 Ethyl acetate 84, 86
Delta-Hexylvalerolactone 84 Ethyl butanoate 84
Deltamethrin 95, 96, 97 Ethyl butyrate 86
Delta-Undecalactone 84 Ethyl caproate 84
Demethoxycurcumin 75, 76 Ethyldecanoate 86
Deoxynivalenol 122, 123 Ethyl њ-D-Glucoside 28
Diarrhetic Shellfish Poison (DSP) 115, 116 Ethylhexanoate 86
Diazinon 90, 95, 96, 97 Ethyl Isothiocyanate 42
Dichlofluanid 95, 96, 97 Ethyloctanoate 86
Dicloran 95, 96, 97 Ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate 58
Dietary Supplement 45, 46, 47, 56, 107, 108 Eucalyptol 81
Dihydrocapsaicin 41 Eudesm-7 (11) -en-4-ol 84
Dihydrocarvone 79 Eurotium chevalieri 165, 166
Dimethoate 102
Dimethyl disulfide 86 F
Dimethylpyrazine 86 F 131
Dimethyl sulfide 137 Fast Green FCF(G3) 72, 73
Dimethyl sulfone 86 Fast Red E 73
Dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX-1) 115 Fat 8, 9
Diphenylamine 95, 96, 97 Fatty acid 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 167
Discharge pipe packing 132, 133 Fe 107, 108, 131, 133
DNA 134, 135, 152, 153, 154, 155, 159, 160, 161 Fenarimol 95, 96, 97
163, 164, 165, 166 Fenazaquin 95, 96, 97
Dodecanoic acid 86 Fenitrothion 95, 96, 97
Dog 134, 135 Fenpropathrin 95, 96, 97
Dog Food 112 Fenthion 95, 96, 97
DSP 115, 116 Fenvalerate 95, 96, 97
Ferulic acid 33
E Fipronil 95, 96, 97
E. coli LT 162 Fish 1, 2, 141, 154
E. coli STh 162 Flavanones 51, 52
E. coli STp 162 Flavonoids 44, 45, 46
E. coli VT1 162 Flour 43, 82, 118, 121, 122, 123, 129, 139
E. coli VT2 162 Flusilazole 95, 96, 97
E. coli VT1&2 162 Folic acid 20, 21
EI-MRM 1, 2 Folpet 95, 96, 97
EI-SIM 1, 2 Food Product Packaging 180, 181, 182
Elaidic acid 3 Formic acid 11
Ellagic acid 34 Fructofuranosylnystose 25
Endosulfan sulfate 95, 96, 97 Fructo-oligosaccharide 25
Epicatechin (EC) 30 Fructose 25, 28
Epicatechin Gallate (ECG) 30 Fruit crops 103
Epicatechin 3-(3-”O -methyl) gallate (ECG3M” e) 30 Functional Beverage 71
Epicatechin 3-(4-”O -methyl) gallate (ECG4M” e) 30 Functional Drink 69
Epichlorohydrin 169, 171 Fungicide 103 185
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
G I
G3 (Fast Green FCF) 72, 73 IDP 23
GABA (ќ-Aminobutyric Acid) 15, 16, 17 IMP 23
Galactose 26, 27 Imtakt Scherzo SM-C18 20
Gallic Acid (GA) 30, 33 Indigo Carmine 72, 73
Gallocatechin (GC) 30 InertCap 17MS 87
Gallocatechin Gallate(GCG) 30 InertCap Pure-WAX 83, 85
Gamma-Butylbutyrolactone 84 Inosine 23
Gamma-Caprolactone 84 Inositol 70
Gamma-Dodecalactone 84 Iprodione 95, 96, 97
Gamma linolenic acid 3 Irradiated Food 167, 168
Gamma-n-Amylbutyrolactone 84 Isoamyl acetate 84
Gamma-Terpinene 81 Isoborneol 81
Garlic 29 Isobutyl alcohol 86
GDP 23 Isobutyl isovalerate 84
Genistein 43 Isobutyric acid 86
Genistin 43 Isoflavones 43
Geraniol 84 Isoleucine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Germacrene D 81 Isopropyl alcohol 137
Ginger 49, 50 Isorhamnetin 44, 45
Gingerol 49, 50 Isothiocyanates 42
Ginkgo Biloba 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 Isovaleraldehyde 86
Ginkgolic Acid 47, 48 ITP 23
Ginkgolide 46
Ginseng 53, 54 K
Ginsenoside 53, 54 K 107, 108, 124, 131,133
Glucose 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 71 Kaempferol 44, 45
Glutamic Acid 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Kestose 25
Glutamine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 .LQHWH[ѥP&c 22
Glyceryl trioleate 4 .LQHWH[ѥP&c 18, 72
Glycine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Glycyrrhizic acid 66 L
GMP 23 Lactitol 70
Goat 134, 135 Lactose 26, 27
Green S 73 Leach Test 169, 170
Green Tea 30, 31, 64, 69 Lead 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 115, 177, 178, 179
GTP 23 Leucine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Guanine 22 Limonene 79, 81, 93
Guanosine 22 Linalool 81, 84
Linalyl acetate 81
H Linoleic acid 3
HALO®C18 30, 31, 35, 37 Lupulone 35, 36, 37
Happ-Genzel 130, 132 Lutein 55, 56
Heptaose 24 Lycopene 39
Hesperetin 51 Lysine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Hesperidin 51, 52
Hexanal 86 M
Hexanoic acid 86 Magnesium 132, 133
Hexyl acetate 84 Magnesium silicate 132, 133
Hg 179 Malathion 90, 95, 96, 97
HILIC 28, 64, 68, 70 Malonic acid 11
Histidine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Malonyldaidzin 43
Hop 35, 36 Malonylgenistin 43
Horse 134, 135 Malonylglycitin 43
Horseradish 42, 69 Maltitol 70, 71
Humulone 35, 36, 37, 38 Maltoheptaose 24
Hydrosphere C18 10 Maltose 24, 26, 27, 28
186 Hypoxanthine 23 Maltotriose 24
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
Mannitol 70 Okadaic Aid (OA) 115, 116
Mannose 26, 27 Oleic acid 3
Melamine 111, 128, 129, 169 Oligosaccharide 24, 25, 68, 109
Menthol 79 OPA 14, 16, 29
Menthone 79 OPTIC-4 83, 84, 85, 86, 87
Menthoturan 79 Orange Ⅱ 73
Mepanipyrim 95, 96, 97 Orange G 73, 77
Metalaxyl 94, 95, 96, 97 Orange Juice 103, 104
Methanethiol 86 Orange Oil 93, 94
Methidathion 95, 96, 97 Organic Acid 11
Methionine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Organic Orange Oil 93, 94
Methyl cis-11,14,17-Icosatrienoate 1, 2 Organophosphorus Pesticides 89, 90
Methyldecanoate 86 Ornithine 16, 17
Methylhexanoate 86 Orotic acid 10
Methyl linolenate 1, 2 Oxadixyl 95, 96, 97
Methyl Methacrylate 169, 176
Methyl p-hydroxybenzoate 58 P
Mg 107, 108, 132, 133 P 131, 133
Milk 8, 9, 129 Palatinol 70
Minerals 107, 108, 132 Palmitic acid 3, 167
Mn 107, 108, 131 Palm Oil 6, 7
Mo 107, 108 Pantothenic acid 20, 21
Mold 61, 165, 166 Para Red 78
MonoTrap 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 Parathion 90, 95, 96, 97
Mouse 134, 135 Parathion-methyl 95, 96, 97
Multivariate analysis 8, 9, 156, 157, 158 Patent Blue V 73
Mycyclobutanil 92, 95 Pb 105, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111
Myrcene 81 112, 113, 169,177, 178, 179
PCI-MRM 1, 2
N PCI-SIM 1, 2
Na 131, 133 PCR 134, 135, 152, 153, 154, 155, 159
NaAsO2 124 160, 161, 163, 164, 165,166
Natamycin 61 Peach Juice 34, 83, 84
Naringenin 51 Peanuts 159, 160
Naringin 51, 52 Pectenotoxin (PTX) 115, 116
Narirutin 51, 52 Pendimethalin 95, 96, 97
Nb 133 Penicillium digitatum 165, 166
Neohesperidin 51, 52 Pepper Sauce 41
Neotame 66 Permethrin 95, 96, 97
Neryl acetate 81 Pesticide 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96
New Coccine 72, 73 97, 98, 99, 100,101, 102, 103
Ni 131 Pet Food 111, 112
Niacin 18 PHBA butyl 58, 59
Nicotinamide 18, 20, 21 PHBA ethyl 58, 59
Nicotinic acid 20, 21 PHBA methyl 58, 59
NIES No.10 113, 114 PHBA propyl 58, 59
Nivalenol 122, 123 Phenol 169, 170
Nootkatone 84 Phenolic Acids 33, 34
Nordihydrocapsaicin 41 3KHQRPHQH[.LQHWH[ѥP&c 72
Norvaline 12, 13 Phenomenex LUNA NH2 64
Nucleobase 22, 23 Phenomenex Luna PFP (2) 66
Nucleoside 22, 23 Phenomenex Synergi Hydro-RP 11, 122
Nucleotide 22, 23 3KHQRPHQH[6\QHUJLѥP3RODU53 53
Nystose 25 Phenthoate 95, 96, 97
Phenylalanine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
O Phenyl Isothiocyanate 42
Octanoic acid 86 Phloxine 72, 73
Octyl acetate 84 Phosalone 95, 96, 97 187
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
Phytoalexin 32 Ronnel 90
Pig 134, 135 Rose Bengale 72, 73
Pirimicarb 95 Rtx-5MS 58, 62, 80
Pirimiphos-methyl 95, 96, 97 Rtx-200MS 99, 100, 101, 102
Pizza 130, 131 Rtx-WAX 3, 171
PLS 8, 9 Rubber Nipple 169, 170
Polycarbonate 169, 172, 173 Rxi-5MS 126, 167
Polymethyl Methacrylate 176 Rxi-5Sil MS 95, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102
Polyvinyl Chloride 169, 171, 175
Polyvinylidene Chloride 169, 174 S
Pork 147, 167 S 131, 132, 133
Prawn 159, 160 Saccharin 66
Preservatives 58, 59, 60, 109 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 165, 166
Processed Foods 29, 33, 100, 101, 102 Salicylic acid 33
Procymidone 95, 96, 97, 98 Salmonella 161, 162
Profenofos 95, 96, 97 Saury 1, 2
Proline 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 Sb 169, 179
Propiconazole 95, 96, 97 SBS 132, 133
Propyl p-hydroxybenzoate 58 Se 107, 108, 179
Propyzamide 95, 96, 97 Serine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Protocatechuic acid 33 Sheep 134, 135
Pyridaben 95, 96, 97 Shim-pack Amino-Na 29
Pyridine 137 Shim-pack CLC-C8 47
Pyridoxine 18, 20, 21 Shim-pack CLC-SIL (M) 65
Pyrimethanil 95, 96, 97, 100 Shim-pack FC-ODS 19, 46, 57, 78, 120
Pyriproxyfen 95, 96, 97 Shim-pack GVP-ODS 40
Shim-pack ISA-07/S2504 26
Q Shim-pack VP-ODS
QuEChERS 89, 90, 91, 92, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 101 33, 39, 40, 41, 44, 55, 61, 75, 77, 82, 116
Quercetin 44, 45 Shim-pack XR-ODS
Quick-DB 99, 100, 101, 102 34, 42, 43, 49, 51, 55, 60, 74, 75, 128
QuinolineYellow S 73 Shim-pack XR-ODS Ⅱ 33, 117
Quinoxyfen 98 Shim-pack XR-ODS Ⅲ 22, 23, 32
Shim-pack XR-Phenyl 34
R Shim-pack XR-SIL 65
R2 (Amaranth) 72, 73 Shogaol 49, 50
R3 (Erythrosine) 72, 73 Shrimp 136, 137
R40 (Allura Red AC) 72, 73 Si 131, 132, 133
R102 (New Coccine) 72, 73 Sinapic acid 33
R104 (Phloxine) 72, 73 Sinigrin 42
R105 (Rose Bengal) 72, 73 Soft Drink 11, 15, 59, 60, 64, 67
R106 (Acid Red) 72, 73 Sorbic Acid 58, 59, 60
Rabbit 134, 135 Sorbitol 70, 71
Rat 134, 135 Soy 43
Red 2G 73 Soybean Flour 43
Red Pepper 41 Soybean Paste 43, 165
RESTEK Stabilwax 137 Soymilk 43
Resveratrol 32 Soy sauce 6, 59, 176
Retinol 19 SP-2560 2
Retinol acetate 19 Spice 41, 49
Retinol palmitate 19 Sr 133
Rhamnose 26, 27 Staphylococcus aureus EA 162
Riboflavin 18, 20, 21 Staphylococcus aureus TSST-1 162
Riboflavin phosphate 18 Starch 131, 139, 144
Ribose 26, 27 Stearic acid 3, 167
Rice 28, 113, 114, 146, 148, 152, 153 Stirophos 90
Rice gruel 148 Styrene butadiene styrene 132
188 Rice Variety 152, 153 Sucralose 66, 67
INDEX
Item Page Item Page
Sucrose 25, 26, 27, 28, 66, 139 Tryptophan 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
SudanⅠ 77, 78 TTP 23
Sudan Ⅱ 77, 78 Tuna 154, 155
Sudan Ⅲ 77, 78 Turmeric 74, 75
Sudan Ⅳ 77, 78 Tyrosine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Sudan Dyes 77, 78
Sudan Orange G-a 77 U
Sudan Orange G-b 77 92U 131
Sudan Red 7B 77 UDP 23
Sudan Red G 77 ULBON HR-20M 79
Sugar Alcohols 70, 71 UMP 23
Sugarless Candy 71 Unison UK-Amino 70
Sugarless Mint Tablet 71 Uracil 22
Sukiyaki 148 Uridine 22
Sunset Yellow FCF 72, 73 USP32 45, 48
SVR 8, 9 UTP 23
Sweeteners 66, 67, 70, 109
6\QHUJLѥP3RODU53c 53 V
Syringic acid 33 Valine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Syrup 25 Vanillic acid 33
Vegetable juice 12, 13
T Vegetable soup 148
Tap Water 132, 133 Vermicelli 144, 145
Tartrazine 72, 73 Vibrio parahaemolyticus 162
Tau-Fluvarlinate 95, 96, 97 Vinclozolin 95, 96, 97
Taurine 16 Vinyl Chloride 169, 171,175
TBHQ 62, 63 Vinylidene Chloride 169, 174
TCA 126, 127 Vitamin B12 21
TDP 23 Vitamin C 62
Tebuconazole 95, 96, 97
Tebufenpyrad 95, 96, 97 W
Tefluthrin 95, 96, 97 Water-Soluble Vitamins 18, 20, 21, 107
Terpenoids 46 Wheat 118, 129, 144, 159, 160
Terpinene-4-ol 79 Whey 10
Terpineol 84 Whiskey 140
Tetraconazole 95, 96, 97 Wine 17, 32, 34, 87, 88, 126, 127, 165
Tetradifon 95, 96, 97
Tetrahydrofuran 137 X
Theanine 16 Xylose 26, 27
Thiamine 18, 20, 21 Xylitol 70, 71
Threonine 12, 13, 15, 16, 17
Thymidine 22 Y
Thymine 22 Y4 (Tartrazine) 72, 73
Ti 132, 133 Y5 (Sunset Yellow FCF) 72, 73
TMP 23 Yeast 61, 165, 166
Tocopherols 65 Yessotoxin 115
Tomato 39 YMC-Triart C18 14, 16
Tolclofos-methyl 95, 96, 97 Yogurt 10
Toluene 86, 137
Tolylfluanid 95, 96, 97 Z
Trans Fatty Acid 4, 5 ZB-AAA 12
Triacetin 84 Zeaxanthin 55, 56
Triazophos 95, 96, 97 Zn 107, 108, 132, 133, 169
Tributylamine 172, 173 Zr 133
Trielaidin 4, 5
Triethylamine 172, 173
Trifluralin 95, 96, 97
Trimethylamine 136, 137 189
Company names, product/service names and logos used in this publication are trademarks and trade names of Shimadzu Corporation or its
affiliates, whether or not they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “®”.
Third-party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services. Shimadzu
disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own.