The document discusses guidelines for adjusting versus modifying validated HPLC methods. It provides parameters that can be varied for the mobile phase, column, and system as adjustments without requiring full revalidation. These include pH, buffer concentration, solvent ratio, column length and diameter, particle size, temperature, and flow rate. The document then examines a diphenhydramine HPLC method and proposes adjustments to the mobile phase and column to improve reproducibility and efficiency. Validation requirements are reviewed including robustness testing, which is demonstrated for the adjusted diphenhydramine method.
The document discusses guidelines for adjusting versus modifying validated HPLC methods. It provides parameters that can be varied for the mobile phase, column, and system as adjustments without requiring full revalidation. These include pH, buffer concentration, solvent ratio, column length and diameter, particle size, temperature, and flow rate. The document then examines a diphenhydramine HPLC method and proposes adjustments to the mobile phase and column to improve reproducibility and efficiency. Validation requirements are reviewed including robustness testing, which is demonstrated for the adjusted diphenhydramine method.
The document discusses guidelines for adjusting versus modifying validated HPLC methods. It provides parameters that can be varied for the mobile phase, column, and system as adjustments without requiring full revalidation. These include pH, buffer concentration, solvent ratio, column length and diameter, particle size, temperature, and flow rate. The document then examines a diphenhydramine HPLC method and proposes adjustments to the mobile phase and column to improve reproducibility and efficiency. Validation requirements are reviewed including robustness testing, which is demonstrated for the adjusted diphenhydramine method.
The document discusses guidelines for adjusting versus modifying validated HPLC methods. It provides parameters that can be varied for the mobile phase, column, and system as adjustments without requiring full revalidation. These include pH, buffer concentration, solvent ratio, column length and diameter, particle size, temperature, and flow rate. The document then examines a diphenhydramine HPLC method and proposes adjustments to the mobile phase and column to improve reproducibility and efficiency. Validation requirements are reviewed including robustness testing, which is demonstrated for the adjusted diphenhydramine method.
Validated HPLC Methods To Tweak or Not to Tweak Slide 5 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Adjustments of operating conditions to meet system suitability requirements may be necessary. USP 23 p1776 001816S1.PPT Slide 6 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 What is the line between adjusting conditions and actually modifying an official or regulatory method? This is critical to know because modifying a method requires validation and ruggedness testing. 001817S1.PPT Slide 7 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Lets examine some proposed guidelines for this area. System Suitability Tests in Regulatory Liquid and Gas Chromatographic Methods: Adjustments Versus Modifications William B. Furman, John G. Dorsey, and Lloyd R. Snyder Pharmaceutical Technology, June 1998 p. 58-64 001818S1.PPT Slide 8 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 HPLC Method Parameters That Can Be Varied The pH of the mobile phase: +/- 0.2 pH units Concentration of the buffer salts: +/- 10% (buffer pH must remain same +/- 0.2 pH units) Ratio of the solvents in the mobile phase: +/- 30% relative or +/- 2% absolute, whichever is larger, but no change can exceed 10% (based on mobile phase component of 50% or less) Mobile Phase 001819S1.PPT Slide 9 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 HPLC Method Parameters That Can Be Varied Column Column length: +/- 70% (250 mm columns may be substituted over the range 75 425 mm) Column inner diameter: +/- 25% (if method calls for 3.9 mm id, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.6 mm can be substituted) Particle size: may be reduced up to 50% (3 or 3.5 m particles can be used instead of 5 m) Column temperature: +/- 20C 001820S1.PPT Slide 10 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 HPLC Method Parameters That Can Be Varied System Flow Rate: +/- 50% Injection Volume: - Increase up to 2x maintain peak shape, resolution, retention time, etc. - Decrease as much as will maintain acceptable precision and sensitivity 001821S1.PPT Slide 11 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Lets look at a problem method and determine if it can be adjusted or must be modified. 001822S1.PPT Slide 12 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 USP Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Method Mobile Phase: 50% Acetonitrile: 50% Water: 0.5% Triethylamine Prepare solution and adjust pH to 6.5 with glacial acetic acid Column: 4.6 x 250 mm, L10 (CN) Flow Rate: 1mL/min Detection: UV 254 nm System Suitability: Benzophenone and Diphenhydramine Solution Specifications: Rs > 2.0, Tf < 2.0 for diphenhydramine 001823S1.PPT Slide 13 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Method Problems The pH drifts and retention changes because of unreliable pH adjustment on mobile phase with organic present. The traditional CN column shows more changes than the SB-CN column. October 28 Apparent pH 6.5 Time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 D November 6 Apparent pH 6.2 November 1 Apparent pH 6.2 B D B D B Cyano Cyano Cyano SB-CN SB-CN SB-CN D B D B D B Time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (min) 0 2 4 6 8 10 001824S1.PPT Slide 14 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Method Adjustment Adjust pH on aqueous component alone. This is done by measuring the amount of acid it requires to get to the apparent pH, then adding this amount to the aqueous component (with TEA). This becomes the new pH of the mobile phase. This procedure works best if the mobile phase is actually buffered. 001825S1.PPT Slide 15 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Recommendations Use a proper buffer and make the pH adjustment to the aqueous portion alone, but keep the mobile phase as similar as possible to maintain expected behavior. Select a Rapid Resolution L10 column to minimize analysis time and maintain resolution. Use an SB-CN (L10) to improve reproducibility. 001826S1.PPT Slide 16 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Modified Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Method Parameters Column: 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 mm, StableBond SB-CN (L10) 1 Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM ammonium acetate pH 4.5/ 0.5% TEA: 45% Acetonitrile 2 Flow Rate: 1mL/min Detection: UV 265 nm 2 Temperature: RT System Suitability: Benzophenone and Diphenhydramine Solution Specifications: Rs > 2.0, Tf < 2.5 for diphenhydramine 1 method adjustment 2 method modification 001827S1.PPT Slide 17 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Modified Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Method Example Time (min) 0 5 10 Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Column: StableBond SB-CN Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM CH 3 COONH 4 /0.5% TEA : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 2. Benzophenone Injection Volume: 10 L Detection: UV 265 nm 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 m R s = 7.5 T f = 1.5 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m R s = 5.9 T f = 1.4 1 2 1 2 001828S1.PPT Slide 18 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Break Number 1 For Questions and Answers Press *1 on Your Phone to Ask a Question Slide 19 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Method Validation Requirements Robustness Linearity Accuracy Precision Limit of Detection Limit of Quantitation Specificity/Selectivity Range Ruggedness 001829S1.PPT Slide 20 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 USP Data Requirements for Method Validation Impurities Product Parameter Bulk Drug Degradates Performance Precision Yes Yes Yes Accuracy Yes Yes Maybe Limit of Detection No No Maybe Limit of Quantitation No Yes Maybe Specificity/Selectivity Yes Yes Maybe Range Yes Yes Maybe Linearity Yes Yes Maybe Ruggedness Yes Yes Yes 001830S1.PPT Slide 21 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Robustness Testing 1. pH 2. Temperature 3. % Organic 4. Buffer Concentration 5. Column Lot Vary Key Method Parameters - meet or exceed method adjustment recommendations Use System Suitability Mixture - diphenhydramine/benzophenone and focus on behavior of diphenhydramine 001831S1.PPT Slide 22 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 pH Variation pH Time R s T f A 4.0 1.78 6.2 1.7 B 4.5 1.94 5.5 1.7 C 5.0 2.14 4.0 1.8 Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM CH 3 COONH 4 /0.5% TEA : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/mL 2. Benzophenone .005 mg/mL Injection Volume: 10 mL Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 Tested pH at 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0. Monitor for substantial changes in retention, resolution, and peak shape 1 2 1 2 A B C Time (min) Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 001832S1.PPT Slide 23 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Buffer Concentration Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% CH 3 COONH 4 (pH 4.5)/0.5% TEA : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/mL 2. Benzophenone .005 mg/mL Injection Volume: 10 mL Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 Conc. Time T f A 20 mM 1.98 1.8 B 25 mM 1.96 1.8 C 30 mM 1.99 1.8 Tested two additional buffer strengths, 20 mM and 30 mM Monitor for changes in retention and peak shape C B A 001833S1.PPT Slide 24 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Temperature 1 2 Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% CH 3 COONH 4 (pH 4.5)/0.5% TEA : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: see below Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/mL 2. Benzophenone .005 mg/mL Injection Volume: 10 L C T f A RT 1.6 1.8 B 30 1.6 1.7 C 35 1.6 1.7 Tested 3 temperatures Room Temperature, 30C and 35C Monitor for changes in selectivity () and peak shape of diphenhydramine C B A Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 001834S1.PPT Slide 25 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 % Organic Time (min) 1 2 Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: CH 3 COONH 4 (pH 4.5)/0.5% TEA : ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/mL 2. Benzophenone .005 mg/mL Injection Volume: 10 mL % ACN R t k R s A 40 2.27 2.0 7.5 B 43 2.07 1.8 6.4 C 45 1.96 1.6 5.0 D 50 1.75 1.3 2.8 Expect retention, selectivity and resolution to change with change in organic. Determine which mobile phase meets needs (adequate retention, resolve matrix components) without wasting time. D C B A 0 1 2 3 4 5 001835S1.PPT Slide 26 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Column Lot Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% CH 3 COONH 4 (pH 4.5)/0.5% TEA : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 0.5 mg/mL 2. Benzophenone .005 mg/mL Injection Volume: 10 mL Time (min) 1 2 Compare three current lots of material for consistency of retention (k) and selectivity (). 0 1 2 3 Three Lot Summary Mean SD RSD k (D) 1.1 0.01 1.0% k (B) 2.9 0.06 2.1% 2.6 0.05 1.8% Lot B98001 Lot B97110 Lot B97077 001836S1.PPT Slide 27 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Break Number 2 For Questions and Answers Press *1 on Your Phone to Ask a Question Slide 28 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Method Validation Requirements Robustness Linearity Accuracy Precision Limit of Detection Limit of Quantitation Specificity/Selectivity Range Ruggedness 001837S1.PPT Slide 29 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Linearity How? Regression analysis of test results vs analyte concentration. For the bulk substance type of samples we must cover a range of 80 - 120% of the expected concentration. Diphenhydramine Linearity R 2 = 0.9999 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 0 50 100 150 Level (%) A r e a
Area Predicted Area Linear (Area) 001838S1.PPT Slide 30 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Accuracy How? Calculate % recovery of known amounts added to samples above and below expected levels. We tested the ICH* recommended 3 replicates at 3 different levels one above and two below. Results Level Accuracy 125% 99.6 +/- 0.2% 75% 100.3 +/- 0.8% 25% 99.2 +/- 0.7% * ICH - International Conference on Harmonization 001839S1.PPT Slide 31 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Precision/Repeatability How? Calculate (relative) standard deviation of a sufficient number of sample aliquots. This can be from three levels three repetitions or 6 determinations at 100%. Results Level SD RSD 125% 0.16 0.2% 75% 0.76 0.8% 25% 0.67 0.7% 001840S1.PPT Slide 32 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Limit of Detection* Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM CH 3 COONH 4 , pH 4.5 : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine Time (min) How? Signal-to-noise ratio of 2:1 or 3:1 is generally accepted. Compare to blank. We used a S/N of 3:1. Result 0.2 ppm (2 ng on column) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 1 *not required for validation of this method 001841S1.PPT Slide 33 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Limit of Quantitation* Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM CH 3 COONH 4 , pH 4.5 : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine 2. Benzophenone Time (min) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 How? Determine the standard deviation of blank response x10. Verify accuracy and precision with samples close to the calculated limit. Result 1.2 ppm (12 ng on column) with precision = 5.9% 1 2 *not required for validation of this method 001842S1.PPT Slide 34 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Specificity/Selectivity Column: SB-CN, 4.6 x 75 mm, 3.5 m Mobile Phase: 55% 25 mM CH 3 COONH 4 , pH 4.5 : 45% ACN Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Temperature: RT Sample: 1. Diphenhydramine How? Compare test results from samples with impurities, degradation products, excipients etc. with those without. Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 Fresh Tablet Degraded Tablet Time (min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 001843S1.PPT Slide 35 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Range How? Verify acceptable precision, accuracy, and linearity at the ends of the range and within the range. Our tested range went up to the 175% level. Therefore we needed to verify linearity, accuracy, and precision at this level, in addition to those done previously. Diphenhydramine Linearity Extended Range R 2 = 0.9998 0 500000 1000000 1500000 0 100 200 Level (%) A r e a Area Predicted Area Linear (Area) Level Acc. SD RSD 175% 100.6% 0.40 0.4% 001844S1.PPT Slide 36 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Ruggedness/Reproducibility How? Multiple chemists in multiple labs run samples. Results should be reproducible and can be compared to method precision. Result Samples were run in 3 labs by 3 chemists on 3 different instruments. Chemist 1 Chemist 2 Chemist 3 Level Accuracy/RSD Accuracy/RSD Accuracy/RSD 125% 99.6 +/- 0.2% 100.2 +/- 0.8% 99.0 +/- 0.8% 75% 100.3 +/- 0.8% 100.5 +/- 0.0% 100.5 +/- 0.3% 125% 99.2 +/- 0.7% 100.6 +/- 0.0% 101.0 +/- 0.7% Overall 99.7 +/- 0.9% 100.4 +/- 0.4% 100.2 +/- 1.0% Method 100.0 +/- 0.9% 001845S1.PPT Slide 37 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Determining System Suitability Specifications What type of variation do you see normally and how much leeway do you want? What makes accurate chromatographic results possible? Try to account for column degradation and insufficiently tested methods. 001846S1.PPT Slide 38 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 System Suitability Setting System Suitability Specifications: Tailing Factor < 2.5 (allows for higher sample load) Resolution > 2.0 (allows for method variation and column aging) RSD of replicate injections < 2.0% (checks system performance) 001847S1.PPT Slide 39 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Conclusions New suggested guidelines may make it easier to determine what is a method adjustment to meet system suitability requirements. When needed method modifications exceed adjustments then method validation is required. Method validation requires experimentation to verify that a method will meet analytical needs. 001848S1.PPT Slide 40 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Acknowledgments Agilent Technologies LFAD, Newport Site John Henderson Bud Permar 001849S1.PPT Slide 41 Phone Number: 1-816-650-0774 Wrap-up E-Seminar Questions