06 - Chapter 3
06 - Chapter 3
06 - Chapter 3
100
, , UNIVERSll
101
S u b s t i t u t e values of S|'j from (3.1.3) into equation
(2.4.15a) a n d get
= (l + 6 r ) u , , . + ( 4 - 1 2 r ) u . j + ( l + 6r)u.,,.
...(3.1.4)
where r = c At/h . This set of s i m u l t a n e o u s e q u a t i o n s c a n
now be solved equation (3.1.4) k n o w n a s cubic spline
Explicit formula to solve equation (3.1.1).
The finite difference replacement of (3.1.1)
corresponding to implicit s c h e m e is
102
= (6/h2)(Ui.i j+i- 2ui j+i+uj+i j+i)
which gives
...(3.1.8)
where r = c^At/h^ , i = l,2,3,....,(n-l). Above equation
(3.1.8) is k n o w n a s cubic spline implicit formula to solve
equation (3.1.1).
Now UQ j+i and u^j+i sire k n o w n d u e to the prescribed
103
h a s advantage that there is no limitation on the value of r
for convergence and stability along with small values are
more accurate. Values much larger than unity are not
desirable. These two methods will be discussed late on by
taking its actual approximation to a problem.
Q e<x+dx)
X+dx GCX) AAA- Kx+dx)
Kx)
source Load
T
V77777777777777777777/, V77777777777777777777Z,
Figure (3.2.1)
Flow of electricity in a cable
104
c o n d u c t a n c e (leak ness) a n d C t h e capacitance per u n i t
length of the cable. Let Ax be the length of t h e element PQ
a n d i + Ai, e + Ae be t h e c u r r e n t a n d the electromotive force,
respectively, at Q. Figure (3.2.1b) gives t h e electrical circuit
for t h e element PQ. Since t h e drop in voltage from P to Q is
d u e to t h e resistance RAx a n d i n d u c t a n c e LAx, we have
-Ae = (RAx)i + (LAx) a / a ...(3.2.1)
Agaiin, since t h e drop in the c u r r e n t -At is d u e to t h e
c o n d u c t a n c e GAx a n d capacitance CAx , we have
-Ai = (GAx)e + ( C A x ) a e / a ...(3.2.2)
Dividing e q u a t i o n s (3.2.1) a n d (3.2.2) by Ax a n d taking the
limit a s Ax -^ 0, we get
ai/ax + L(ai/a)+Ri = o ...(3.2.3)
and
di/dx + C(de/dt) + GQ = 0 ...(3.2.4)
105
E q u a t i o n (3.2.5) a n d (3.2.6) are k n o w n a s t h e telephone
equations.
Two special case of t h e telephone e q u a t i o n s are
a^e/ax^zz Re a e / a ...(3.2.7)
d^i/dx^=Rc a/dt ...(3.2.8)
Equation (3.2.7) and (3.2.8) are obtained from
e q u a t i o n s (3.2.5) a n d (3.2.6) by taking G = L = 0 i.e. leakage
a n d i n d u c t a n c e are negligible, for example, in telegraphic
t r a n s m i s s i o n t h r o u g h s u b m a r i n e cables. These e q u a t i o n s
are k n o w n a s telegraphic e q u a t i o n s . Mathematically t h e s e
e q u a t i o n s are similar to parabolic type linear PDE having
one space variable. E q u a t i o n s (3.2.7) a n d (3.2.8) c a n be
rewrite a s
u, = ( l / R C ) u , ,
where u(x, t) s t a n d s for either i(x, t) or e(x, t).
106
Let length of the cable is subdivided into 20
s u b i n t e r v a l s . We g e t h = Ax = l / 2 0 . Also let At = 1/400 a n d
RC = 1 / 1 0 0 , w e g e t r = 0 . 0 1 w h i c h gives
l + 6 r = 1.06 a n d 4 - 12r = 3 . 8 8
S u b s t i t u t i n g t h e v a l u e s of 1 + 6 r a n d 4 - 12r in
e q u a t i o n (3.1.4) a n d u s i n g initial c o n d i t i o n s , w e get
For j = 0
i = 2, U i i + 4 u 2 , i + U 3 i = ( 1 . 0 6 ) u i o + ( 3 . 8 8 ) u 2 , o + ( l - 0 6 ) u 3 o
= 1.846040
i = 3, U 2 J + 4 U 3 1 + U 4 1 = (1.06)u2,o + (3.88)u3o+(1.06)u4^o
= 2.712093
i = 4, U3 1 + 4 u 4 I+U5 I = 3.511370
i = 5, U4,i+4u5,i+U6,i = 4.224184
i = 6, U5^i+4u6,i+U7i = 4.832986
i = 7, U6,i+4u7^i+U8^i = 5.322783
i = 8, U7 1 + 4 u 8 1+U9 1 = 5.621516
i = 9, U 8 i + 4 u 9 i + U i o , i = 5.900351
i = 10, U 9 I + 4 U I O , , + U H , I = 5.973899
S i n c e U9 j and Uu j a r e s y m m e t r i c , w e g e t
2u9,i+4u2io,i =5.973899
H e r e w e g e t 10 a l g e b r a i c e q u a t i o n s i n 10 u n k n o w n s
with t r i - d i a g o n a l m a t r i x . T h i s s y s t e m of e q u a t i o n s is
solved e a s i l y b y a n y well k n o w n m e t h o d like c r o u t ' s m e t h o d ,
107
similarly for j = 1, we get another 10 algebraic equations.
This can be solved easily by above method. Proceeding in
this way, the results obtained by explicit method are shown
in table (3.3.1) and plotted in figure (3.3.1).
Table (3.3.1)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
explicit method
Figure (3.3.1)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
explicit method
108
3 . 3 ( B ) SPLINE SOLUTIONS WITH IMPLICIT METHOD :
I n t h i s s e c t i o n w e d i s c u s s t h e s o l u t i o n of e q u a t i o n
(3.3.1) b y implicit s c h e m e . S u b s t i t u t e t h e v a l u e s of r a n d
u s i n g initial c o n d i t i o n s i n (3.1.8), w e get,
Forj = 0 i.e. at t = 1/400
i = l, (0.97)uo,i+(4.06)uii+(0.97)u2,i = 0.934639
since u^, = 0, w e g e t
= 3, ( 0 . 9 7 ) u 2 , i + ( 4 . 0 6 ) u 3 i + ( 0 . 9 7 ) u 4 i = 2.712429
H e r e w e g e t 10 a l g e b r a i c e q u a t i o n s i n 10 u n k n o w n s
with t r i - d i a g o n a l m a t r i x . T h i s c a n b e solved b y a n y
s t a n d a r d m e t h o d . Similarly, applying above p r o c e s s are, we
get t h e solution at t = 1 / 2 0 0 , 3 / 4 0 0 , 1 / 1 0 0 , 1/80 etc. a n d
t h e y a r e s h o w n i n t a b l e (3.3.2) a n d p l o t t e d i n figure (3.3.2).
109
Table (3.3.2)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
implicit method
1.000000
-•-t = 0 0
t 0.800000 - ^ t = 1/400
_^-"'*^^^
1 t = 1/2D0
3 oeooooo X ^ — 1 = 3^400^
Q400000 y ^ -*-t = 1/100
MT -•-t = 1/80 1
02D0000
nnfYYYYi 1 X
00 0.05 0 1 0 015 O 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 035 0.40 0 4 5 O 5 0
X •
Figure (3.3.2)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic
spline implicit method
no
3.3(C) DISCUSSION OF RESULTS :
Here table (3.3.3) gives the comparison of both the
spline solutions namely explicit and implicit with exact
solutions.
From the table (3.3.3) it is clear that, the spline
solutions are fairly agree with exact solutions up to five
digits of decimal points. Figure (3.3.3(a)) indicates the error
analysis which compares the exact solution with spline
solution obtained by both the methods at t = 1/80. The
figure (3.3.3(b)) gives good agreement of curves presenting
exact and approximate solutions obtained by cubic spline
method.
Table (3.3.3)
Error analysis
Current: in the cable u -> t = 1/80
X USE USI UEXT USE-UEX USI-UEX
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.05 0.156241 0.156241 0.156242 0.000001 0.000001
0.10 0.308635 0.308636 0.308636 0.000001 0.000000
0.15 0.453429 0.453430 0.453431 0.000002 0.000001
0.20 0.587059 0.587060 0.587060 0.000001 0.000000
0.25 0.706233 0.706233 0.706235 0.000002 0.000002
0.30 0.808017 0.808078 0.808019 0.000002 0.000001
0.35 0.889906 0.889906 0.889908 0.000002 0.000002
0.40 0.949882 0.949882 0.949884 0.000002 0.000002
0.45 0.986468 0.986468 0.986471 0.000003 0.000003
0.50 0.998764 0.998764 0.998767 0.000003 0.000003
11
0.000004
0.000003
0.000003
DC 0.000002 -•—USE-UEXT
O
0.000002 •«—USI-UEXT
LU
0.000001
0.000001
0.000000
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Figure (3.3.3(a))
Error analysis (at t = l / 8 0 )
112
1.200000
•^—USE
!
3 -•—USI
UEX
0.000000 A
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
X - "
Figure (3.3.3(b))
113
3.4 THE HEAT CONDUCTION PROBLEM :
Consider a thin long rod surrounded except at
the ends with a material impervious to heat unless all the
points of the rod are at the same temperature, heat will flow
along the rod. If the rod is homogeneous and of the same
cross section throughout, we may schematically regard the
rod as a line, since the temperature of all the points of any
cross section will sensibly the same. When heat is flowing
uniformly, it is experimentally known that the amount of
heat flow across any portion of the rod is proportional to the
difference of temperatures of the end points of the portion,
to the area of cross - section and to the end points of the
flow and inversely proportional to the length of the portion
considered. Taking the limiting case when the length of the
portion considered tends to zero, we obtain the quamtity of
heat Qi that flows across any section of the rod as.
114
Sa
Q2 = -k A per sec ...(3.4.2)
X+SK
Qi - Q2 = k — ...(3.4.3)
X+SK X_
where S = Specific h e a t
and P = Density of the rod
e q u a t i n g the values of Qj - Q2 from (3.4.3) a n d (3.4.4) a n d
dividing by Ss., we have
Sa Sa
Sa Si x+Sx Si
S.P. ,(3.4.5)
St SK
taking t h e limit of this e q u a t i o n a s Ss.-^ 0, we get
S.P. ^ =k^'^
St ^2
Sa k S^u
or
St S.P. &2
writing a = t h e eequat]
q u a t i o n of one dimension h e a t flow is
S.P. ^
Sa S^a
.(3.4.6)
c^t &2
15
t h e cross section at time t. The surface of t h e rod is
i n s u l a t e d a n d therefore there is no h e a t loss t h r o u g h the
b o u n d a r y . The t e m p e r a t u r e distribution of t h e rod is given
by t h e solution of initial b o u n d a r y value problem
Ut = aUxx , 0<x<L t>0
u(0, t) = 0, t >0
,.(3.4.7)
u(L,t) = 0, t<0
u(x,0) = f(x), 0 < x < L
116
U o , i + 4 u i , + U 2 , i = (2.2)uo,o+(l-6)uio+(2.2)u2,o = 0.498
since UQ i = 0
4 u i , i + U 2 , i = 0.498
i = 2,
U i , i + 4 u 2 , i + U 3 i = ( 2 . 2 ) u i o + ( l - 6 ) u 2 , o + ( 2 . 2 ) u 3 o = 0.916
i = 3,
U2,l+4U3,1+U4i = (2.2)U2,o+(l-6)U3o+(2.2)U4o = 1.216
i = 4,
U31+4U41+U51 = ( 2 . 2 ) u 3 o + ( 1 . 6 ) u 4 o + ( 2 . 2 ) u 5 o = 1.396
i = 5,
U4,i+4u5^i+U6^i = (2.2) U4^o+(l-6)115,0+(2.2) ug^o = 1-456
U 5 , i + 4 u 6 i + U 7 i = (2.2)u5o+(1.6)u6,o+(2.2)u7o = 1.396
i = 6,
U5,i+4u6,i+U7i = (2.2)u5o+(1.6)u6,o+(2.2)u7o = 1.396
i = 6,
U5,i+4u6,i+U7i = (2.2)u5o+(1.6)u6,o+(2.2)u7o = 1.396
U 6 , i + 4 u 7 j + U 8 i = (2.2)u6o+(1.6)u7o+(2.2)u8,o = 1-216
i = 8,
U7,i+4u8,i+U9 J = (2.2)u7o+(1.6)u8,o+(2.2)u9o = 0.916
i = 9,
U8,i+4u9i+Uio,i = (2.2)u8o+(1.6)u9o+(2.2)uio,o
U8,i+4u9,i=0.408
s i n c e UJQ 1 = 0
117
Hence we get 9 algebraic equations in 9 unknowns
with tri-diagonal matrix. This system of equation is solved
by any well known method. Similarly, for j = 1, we get
another 9 algebraic equations. This can be solved by above
method. Proceeding in this way, the results obtsdned by
explicit method are shown in table (3.5.1) and plotted in
figure (3.5.1).
Table (3.5.1)
Temperature in a rod through cubic spline solution by
explicit method
Temperature u(x, t)
118
nTimnn
\J.\XKXkAJ
0.250000
-•-t=Q0 i
1 0200000 -•-t=Q002
t=Q004i
3 0150000
-^^ t=0.006
Q100000 HK-t=o.ooe \
- • - t = Q01|
OQBDOOO
nmnrmi
0.0 01 02 03 0.4 05 06 0.7 08 09 1.0
X •
Figure (3.5.1)
Temperature in t h e rod t h r o u g h cubic s p l i n e explicit
method
119
i =6 (0.4)u51 +(5.2)u6 1 +(0.4)u7 1 = 1.408
i =9 (0.4)u8i+(5.2)u9i+(0.4)uio,i = 0.508
Since Uio,i= 0
Temperature u(Xy t)
X t = 0.0 t= 0.002 t =0.004 t =0.006 t =0.008 t = 0.01
0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.1 0.09000 0.08492 0.08208 0.07914 0.07703 0.07464
0.2 0.16000 0.15628 0.15137 0.14777 0.14357 0.14055
0.3 0.21000 0.20592 0.20233 0.19868 0.19411 0.18939
0.4 0.24000 0.23602 0.23185 0.22802 0.22366 0.22040
0.5 0.25000 0.24598 0.24209 0.23771 0.23440 0.22959
0.6 0.24000 0.23602 0.23185 0.22802 0.22366 0.22040
0.7 0.21000 0.20592 0.20233 0.19868 0.19411 0.18939
0.8 0.16000 0.15628 0.15137 0.14777 0.14357 0.14055
0.9 0.09000 0.08492 0.08208 0.07914 0.07703 0.07464
1.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
120
H-t=Q(]0 ^
-^t=Q(]02j
t=Q004^
HK-t=Q(]06|
-•-t=Q01 :
Figure (3.5.2)
Temperature in rod through cubic spline implicit
method
121
Table (3.5.3)
Error analysis
122
0.000600
0.000500
0.000400
DC
O -•—USE-UEX
0.000300
oc -•—USI-UEX
lU
0.000200
0.000100
0.000000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Figure (3.5.3(a))
Error analysis (at t=0.006)
123
0.050000
0.000000 A
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
124
3 . 6 SPLINE FORMULA TO SOLVE PARABOLIC PARTIAL
DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION WITH TWO SPACE
VARIABLES :
Consider the parabolic differential equation having two
space variables.
Uj = c^ (Uxx + Uyy) ; 0<x<a,0<y<b,t>0 ...(3.6.1)
K k . i - U y , k ) / A t =c2(2S;,k) ...(3.6.2)
level. #
Now with the help of equation (2.4.15a) a n d t h e value
of Sjj k obtained from equation (3.6.2) we get,
125
Ui-lj,k+l " " i - l j , k Uy 1^+1 - Ujj ]^ Uj_^ij k+1 - Uj+ij k
At last we get,
Ui-lj,k+l + 4 U y j^+l + Uj+ij k+l
126
where SjJ j^ and S,j ^+1 d e n o t e s e c o n d d e r i v a t i v e s of S(x) a t
X = Xjj a t t h e t i m e i n t e r v a l k a n d k + 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y .
W e c a n e x p r e s s (3.6.1) i n t e r m s of u a s follows. W e u s e
t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p ( 2 . 4 . 1 5 a ) a n d r e w r i t e it a s
.(3.6.5)
= (6/h') ( u , , j , - 2 u . j , + u . , , . J
t h i s gives
(l-6r)u..,j ,„ + (4 + 12r) u , j , , , + ( l - 6 r ) U i , , ^ , ^
= (l + 6 r ) u , , , , + (4-12r) u , , , + (l + 6r)u.„ .,,)
127
In b o t h the m e t h o d s , once the values of u are k n o w n at
(k + 1)* level, we c a n proceed to c o m p u t e t h e next level (k +
2) by s a m e t e c h n i q u e s a s above. The coefficient matrix of
the combined equation is a s q u a r e matrix, however, t h e
system becomes a tri-diagonal one w h e n s e p a r a t e c a s e s are
h a n d l e d . These two m e t h o d s will be d i s c u s s e d later on by
taking its a c t u a l approximation to a problem.
y^
Figure (3.7.1)
Thin rectangular plate
128
where K is the t h e r m a l s conductional of t h e material a n d
u(x, y, t) is the t e m p e r a t u r e function. The negative signs are
t a k e n b e c a u s e the h e a t flows in the direction of decreasing
t e m p e r a t u r e . Hence t h e quantity of h e a t remaining in the
plate a s a result of entry t h r o u g h t h e side AB a n d exit
t h r o u g h t h e side CD is
K {(du/dx\ , ^, - (au/ax), } AyAt
= K{(6Vax^)Ax}AyAt
u p t o a first approximation.
Similarly corresponding difference in t h e h e a t entering
a n d leaving t h r o u g h t h e r e m a i n i n g pair of opposite side is
K{(aV5x2)Ay}AxAt ...(3.7.2)
Hence the total h e a t retained by t h e plate in time At is
t h e s u m of r e s u l t s (3.7.1) a n d (3.7.2), which is equal to the
h e a t required to raise the t e m p e r a t u r e of the element by Au .
T h u s we have
K{(a^u/ax^) + ( a V V ) } A x A y A t = (pAxAy)SAu ...(3.7.3)
where p is t h e density a n d S be the specific h e a t of the
plate. Dividing the equation (3.7.3) by AxAySp a n d taking
limit At ^^ 0, we get
au/a = c^ (d^u/dx^+d\/dy^)
129
0 1 X
Figure (3.7.2)
Thin square plate
130
4-24r = 3.976
S u b s t i t u t i n g the values of 1 + 12r, 4 - 2 4 r with initial
a n d b o u n d a r y conditions in equation (3.6.3), we get
For k = 0
For j = 1
i = 1 Uo,i,i + 4ui^i,, + U2,i,i = 0.146220
Since UQ i i = 0 we have
4ui,i,i+U2ii = 0.146220
Similarly we get 19 x 19 s i m u l t a n e o u s e q u a t i o n s in 19
X 19 u n k n o w n s , for j = 1, 2, 3 , , 19 where i = 1, 2, 3 ,
, 19. This c a n be solved by any s t a n d a r d m e t h o d . Once
t h e r e s u l t s are obtained, for r e s u l t s for (k + 1)* level, r e s u l t s
131
Table (3.8.1(a))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through explicit method
X
0.0
0.0 0.05
0.000000 0.000000
0.10 0.15
0.000000 0.000000
0.20
0.000000
0.25
0.000000
0.30
0.000000
0.35 0.40
0.000000 0.000000
0.45
0.000000
0.50
0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024470 0.048339 0.071016 0.091945 0.110610 0.126552 0.139377 0.148770 0.154500 0.156427
0.10 0.000000 0.048339 0.095487 0.140284 0.181627 0.218497 0.249988 0.275323 0.293878 0.305197 0.309002
0.15 0.000000 0.071016 0.140284 0.206097 0.266836 0.321004 0.367268 0.404489 0.431749 0.448379 0.453968
0.20 0.000000 0.091945 0.181627 0.266836 0.345474 0.415606 0.475505 0.523695 0.558989 0.580520 0.587756
0.25 0.000000 0.110610 0.218497 0.321004 0.415606 0.499975 0.572033 0.630006 0.672465 0.698367 0.707072
0.30 0.000000 0.126552 0.249988 0.367268 0.475505 0.572033 0.654476 0.720804 0.769383 0.799017 0.808977
0.35 0.000000 0.139377 0.275323 0.404489 0.523695 0.630006 0.720804 0.793853 0.847356 0.879993 0.890962
0.40 0.000000 0.148770 0.293878 0.431749 0.558989 0.672465 0.769383 0.847356 0.904464 0.939301 0.951009
0.45 0.000000 0.154500 0.305197 0.448379 0.580520 0.698367 0.799017 0.879993 0.939301 0.975480 0.987640
0.50 0.000000 0.156427 0.309002 0.453968 0.587756 0.707072 0.808977 0.890962 0.951009 0.987640 0.999951
132
Table (3.8.1(b))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through explicit method
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0,45 0.50
^
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024468 0.048334 0.071009 0.091936 0.110599 0.126539 0.139363 0.148756 0.154486 0.156411
0.10 0.000000 0.048364 0.095477 0.140270 0.181609 0.218476 0.249963 0.275295 0.293849 0.305167 0.308971
0.15 0.000000 0.071009 0.140270 0.206077 0.266809 0.320975 0.367229 0.404052 0.431704 0.448335 0.453923
0.20 0.000000 0.091936 0.181609 0.266809 0.345440 0.415565 0.475458 0.523643 0.558934 0.580463 0.587698
0.25 0.000000 0.110599 0.218476 0.320975 0.415565 0.499926 0.571977 0.629943 0.672399 0.698298 0.707002
0.30 0.000000 0.126539 0.249963 0.367229 0.475458 0.571977 0.654412 0.720733 0,769307 0.798938 0.808897
0.35 0.000000 0.139363 0.275295 0.404452 0.523643 0.629943 0.720733 0.793775 0.847272 0.879906 0.890874
0.40 0.000000 0.148754 0.293849 0.431704 0.558934 0.672399 0.769307 0.847272 0.904374 0.939208 0.950915
0.45 0.000000 0.154486 0.305167 0.448335 0.580463 0.698298 0.798938 0.879906 0.939208 0.975383 0.987542
0.50 0.000000 0.156411 0.308971 0.453923 0.587698 0.707002 0.808897 0.890874 0.950915 0.987542 0.999852
133
Table (3.8.1(c))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through explicit method
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024466 0.048329 0.071002 0.091927 0.110588 0.126527 0.139350 0.148741 0.154470 0.156395
0.10 0.000000 0.048329 0.095468 0.140256 0.181591 0.218454 0.249938 0.275268 0.293820 0.305137 0.308940
0.15 0.000000 0.071002 0.140256 0.206057 0.266783 0.320942 0.367189 0.404019 0.431657 0.448292 0.453877
0.20 0.000000 0.091927 0.181591 0.266729 0.345406 0.415524 0.475411 0.523591 0.558879 0.580405 0.587640
0.25 0.000000 0.110588 0.218454 0.320942 0.415524 0.499876 0.571920 0.629881 0.672332 0.698229 0.706932
0.30 0.000000 0.126527 0.249938 0.367189 0.475411 0.571920 0.654347 0.720662 0.769231 0.798860 0.808816
0.35 0.000000 0.139350 0.275268 0.404409 0.523591 0.629881 0.720662 0.793697 0.847188 0.879820 0.890786
0.40 0.000000 0.148751 0.293820 0.431657 0.558879 0.672332 0.769231 0.847188 0.904285 0.939116 0.950821
0.45 0.000000 0.154470 0.305137 0.448292 0.580405 0.698229 0.798860 0.879820 0.939116 0.975287 0.987444
0.50 0.000000 0.156395 0.308940 0.453877 0.587640 0.706932 0.808816 0.890786 0.950821 0.987444 0.999753
134
0.800000
0.700000
0.600000
0.500000 ••-t=1/400
t 0.400000 -»-t=3/400
0.300000 t=1/80
0.200000
0.100000
0.000000 rV
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Figure (3.8.1)
Temperature distribution in tliin rectangular plate through cubic spline explicit method
(at y=0.25)
135
3.8(B) SPLINE SOLUTIONS WITH IMPLICIT METHOD :
136
Table (3.8.2(a))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through implicit method
0.0 o.os 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024470 0.048339 0.071016 0.091945 0.110610 0.126551 0.139377 0.148771 0.154501 0.156427
0.10 0.000000 0.048339 0.095487 0.140284 0.181627 0.218497 0.249988 0.275323 0.293878 0.305197 0.309002
0.15 0.000000 0.071016 0.140284 0.206097 0.266836 0.321004 0.367268 0.404489 0.431749 0.448379 0.453968
0.20 0.000000 0.091945 0.181627 0.266836 0.345474 0.415606 0.475505 0.523695 0.558989 0.580520 0.587756
0.25 0.000000 0.110610 0.218497 0.321004 0.415606 0.499975 0.572033 0.630006 0.672465 0.698367 0.707072
0.30 0.000000 0.126552 0.249988 0.367268 0.475505 0.572033 0.654476 0.720804 0.769383 0.799017 0.808977
0.35 0.000000 0.139377 0.275323 0.404489 0.523695 0.630006 0.720804 0.793853 0.847356 0.879993 0.890962
0.40 0.000000 0.148771 0.293878 0.431749 0.558989 0.672465 0.769383 0.847356 0.904464 0.939301 0.951009
0.45 0.000000 0.154500 0.305197 0.448379 0.580520 0.698367 0.799117 0.879993 0.939301 0.975480 0.987640
0.50 0.000000 0.156427 0.309002 0.453968 0.587756 0.707072 0.808977 0.890962 0.951009 0.987640 0.999951
137
Table (3.8.2(b))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through implicit method
X
0.0
0.0
0.000000
0.05 0.10
0.000000 0.000000
0.15
0.000000
0.20 0.25
0.000000 0.000000
0.30
0.000000
0.35
0.000000
0.40
0.000000
0.45
0.000000
0.50
0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024468 0.048334 0.071009 0.091936 0.110599 0.126539 0.139363 0.148756 0.154486 0.156411
0.10 0.000000 0.048364 0.095477 0.140270 0.181600 0.218476 0.249963 0.275295 0.293849 0.305167 0.308971
0.15 0.000000 0.071009 0.140270 0.206077 0.266809 0.320972 0.367231 0.404449 0.431707 0.448335 0.453923
0.20 0.000000 0.091936 0.181600 0.266809 0.345440 0.415565 0.475458 0.523643 0.558934 0.580463 0.587698
0.25 0.000000 0.110599 0.218476 0.320972 0.415565 0.499926 0,571977 0.629943 0.672399 0.698298 0.707002
0.30 0.000000 0.126539 0.249963 0.367231 0.475458 0.571977 0.654411 0.720733 0.769307 0.798938 0.808897
0.35 0.000000 0.139363 0.275295 0.404449 0.523643 0.629943 0.720733 0.793775 0.847272 0.879906 0.890874
0.40 0.000000 0.148754 0.293849 0.431707 0.558934 0.672399 0.769307 0.847272 0.904374 0.939208 0.950915
0.45 0.000000 0.154486 0.305167 0.448335 0.580463 0.698298 0.798938 0.879906 0.939208 0.975383 0.987542
0.50 0.000000 0.156411 0.308971 0.453923 0.587698 0.707002 0.808897 0.890874 0.950915 0.987542 0.999852
138
Table (3.8.2(c))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through implicit method
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.05 0.000000 0.024465 0.048329 0.071002 0.091927 0.110588 0.126527 0.139350 0.148741 0.154470 0.156395
0.10 0.000000 0.048329 0.095468 0.140256 0.181591 0.218454 0.249938 0.275268 0.293820 0.305137 0.308940
0.15 0.000000 0.071002 0.140256 0.206057 0.266783 0.320941 0.367195 0.404409 0.431664 0.448290 0.453878
0.20 0.000000 0.091927 0.181591 0.266729 0.345406 0.415524 0.475410 0.523591 0.558879 0.580405 0.587640
0.25 0.000000 0.110588 0.218454 0.320941 0.415524 0.499877 0.571920 0.629881 0.672332 0.698229 0.706932
0.30 0.000000 0.126527 0.249938 0.367195 0.475410 0.571920 0.654347 0.720661 0.769231 0.798859 0.808817
0.35 0.000000 0.139350 0.275268 0.404409 0.523591 0.629881 0.720661 0.793699 0.847188 0.879820 0.890786
0.40 0.000000 0.148751 0.293820 0.431664 0.558879 0.672332 0.769231 0.847188 0.904285 0.939116 0.950821
0.45 0.000000 0.154470 0.305137 0.448290 0.580405 0.698229 0.798859 0.879820 0.939116 0.975287 0.987444
0.50 0.000000 0.156395 0.308940 0.453878 0.587640 0.706932 0.808817 0.890786 0.950821 0.987444 0.999753
139
0.800000
0.700000
0.600000
0.500000
0.400000
0.300000
0.200000
0.100000
0.000000 ^
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Figure (3.8.2)
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through cubic spline implicit method
(at y=0.25)
140
3.8 (C) DISCUSSION OF RESULTS :
The solutions of equation (3.7.3) obtained by implicit
as well as explicit solutions are comparing with exact
solutions as follows in table (3.8.3). Clearly the results are
accurate upto five digits of decimal places. Figure (3.8.3(a))
indicates the error analysis which compares the solutions
with spline solutions and figure (3.8.3(b)) gives the single
curve which shows that spline solutions are quite accurate
and reliable.
Table (3.8.3)
Error analysis
141
0.000001
0.000001
t 0.000001
O H#—USE-UEXT
0.000001
-^-USI-UEXT
UJ
0.000000
0.000000
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
X —
Figure (3.8.3(a))
Error Analysis (at y = 0.25 & t = 1/80)
142
0 800000
0.700000 „ ^ 1
0.600000
n
0.500000 n —•—USE
t 0.400000 n -•—USI
3
UEXT
0.300000
0.200000
0.100000
V
0 000000 F 1 : 1 i 1 1 1 1 r ""
0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
X —•
Figure (3.8.3(b))
Temperature distribution in thin rectangular plate through cubic spline implicit method
(att=l/80&y=0.25)
143
3.9 SPLINE FORMULA TO SOLVE HYPERBOLIC
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION WITH ONE
SPACE VARIABLES :
The general form of hyperbolic PDE with one space
variable x a n d time variable t is given by
144
at time jAt s u b s t i t u t i n g t h e values of S" j from equation
...(3.9.6)
where i = 1(1) n - 1
it involves the term Uj+j .j , Uj .^ a n d Uj.j .j which are
i = 1(1) n - 1 ...(3.9.7)
145
The values of Uj .j ; i = 0(l)n a n d u s i n g initial and
146
= (3r2 -1) Ui,,^ j - (6r2 + 4) u,^.^ + (Sr^ -1) u^.,, j.^
+ 2(Ui^i j + 4ui^j + Ui.ij)
...(3.9.9)
where r = cAt/h ; i = l(l)n-l
The above equation (3.9.9) is k n o w n a s cubic spline
implicit formula to solve hyperbolic PDE of t h e form (3.9.1).
Like explicit s c h e m e , described a s above, the equation
(3.9.9) gives (n - 1) s i m u l t a n e o u s linear e q u a t i o n s in (n - 1)
u n k n o w n s with the coefficient matrix of tri-diagonal form.
For j = 0, here we c a n also u s e the initial condition in
similar m a n n e r described a s above.
a^e/ax^ = (LQa^e/at^
147
Let 1 = length of the t r a n s m i s s i o n line = 1 a n d u s i n g
following initial a n d b o u n d a r y conditions, t h e solution of
above equation (3.10.1) i.e. t h e c u r r e n t distribution is
obtained a s follows.
Dirichilet b o u n d a r y conditions :
u(0, t) = 0
u(l, t) = 0 ...(3.10.2)
Initial conditions (cauchy conditions at t = 0)
u(x, 0) = sin ;r X ; 0<x<1
U(x, 0) = 0 ...(3.10.3)
For j = 0
i= 1
148
Uo,, + 4Uj J + U2,i
results
2U41+ 4u5i = 5.902084
149
Table (3.11.1)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
explicit method
1.200000
1.000000
-^\ = 0.0
0.800000 - • - t = 0.01
t t = 0.02
0.600000
~4f-t = 0.03
0.400000 - * - t = 0.04
- • ~ t = 0.05
0.200000
0.000000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Figure (3.11.1)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
explicit method
150
3 . 1 1 (B) SPLINE SOLUTIONS WITH IMPLICIT METHOD:
Using the s a m e initial a n d b o u n d a r y conditions a n d
t h e values of other p a r a m e t e r s d i s c u s s e d in section 3.11(A),
t h e solution of equation (3.11.1) is obtained by implicit
formula t h a t is given by the equation (3.9.9), derived a s
follows.
For j = 0,
i = 1 (0.9997)uo,i + (4.0006)ui 1 + (0.9997)u2,i = 1.823853
S i n c e UQ i = 0
51
Table (3.11.2)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
implicit method
• ^ t = 0.0
•«-t = 0.01
t t = 0.02
•4f-1 = 0.03
• ^ t = 0.04
• ^ t = 0.05
0.000000
0.0 0.1
Figure (3.11.2)
Current distribution in the cable through cubic spline
implicit method
152
3.11 (C) DISCUSSION OF RESULTS :
The current distributions obtained by the solution of
equation (3.10.1) by explicit as well as implicit methods are
compared with the exact solutions at t = 0.04 in the table
(3.11.3). Figure (3.11.3) indicates the error analysis, which
compares the exact solutions with spline solutions, obtained
by both the methods, Explicit as well as Implicit, at t =
0.04. From the table (3.11.3) and figure (3.11.3), it is clear
that solutions obtained by both the methods are fairly good
and correct u p to five decimal places. Also implicit scheme
gives better results than the explicit one.
Table (3.11.3)
Error analysis
Current distribution u ->
X USE USl UEXT USE-UEXT USI-UEXT
:53
0.0000012
0.0000010
1 0.0000008
-•—USE-UEXT
2 0.0000006
-m— USI-UEXT
HI
0.0000004
0.0000002
Figure (3.11.3(a))
Error analysis (at t = 0.04)
154
1.200000
-•—USE
t •«—USI
UEXT
0.000000 A
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Figure (3.11.2(b)
155
3 . 1 2 VIBRATING STRING PROBLEM :
Many problems in m a t h e m a t i c a l physics r e d u c e to t h e
solving of partial differential equations. The partial
differential e q u a t i o n s play a n i m p o r t a n t role in the theory of
elasticity, hydraulics and other some branches of
engineering. One of t h e most important problems in
m a t h e m a t i c a l physics is the vibration of a stretched string.
Simplicity a n d frequent occurrence in m a n y b r a n c h e s of
m a t h e m a t i c a l physics m a k e it classical example in t h e
theory of partial differential e q u a t i o n s .
Let u s consider a stretched string of length L fixed at
t h e end points. The problem here is to determine the
equation of motion which characterizes the position u(x, t)
of the string at time t after a n initial d i s t u r b a n c e is given.
In order to obtain a simple equation we m a k e the
following a s s u m p t i o n s .
(1) The string is flexible a n d elastic t h a t is t h e string
c a n n o t resist bending m o m e n t s a n d t h u s the tension
in t h e string is always in t h e direction of t h e t a n g e n t to
t h e existing profile of t h e string.
(2) There is n o elongation of a single segment of t h e string
a n d h e n c e by Hook's law t h e tension is c o n s t a n t .
(3) The weight of the string is small compared with t h e
tension in the string.
(4) The deflection is small c o m p a r e d with t h e length of t h e
string.
(5) The slope of the displaced string at amy point is small
c o m p a r e d with unity.
156
(6) There is only pure transverse vibration.
Figure (3.12.1)
String position and tension
157
each point acts), with the x-axis then the vertical component
of the force to which this element is subjected is
T sm((f> + S<^) - Tsin^
and as ^ is smiall, we can write
tan ^ = sin ^, so these becomes
T tan{(/> + S(p) - Ttan^
Sa
T<^
x+Sx.
or
da
- X+&
& (3.12.1)
c5x
158
This is the PDE having the vibrations of the string a n d
is called t h e WAVE e q u a t i o n s , which is of HYPERBOLIC
TYPE.
S u p p o s e t h e string of length 2 meter fixed at its b o t h
e n d s , t h e initial velocity g(x) is to be t a k e n 0 a n d from t h e
b a s e d on m a t h e m a t i c a l physics it c a n be k n o w n t h a t t h e
initial displacement f(x) is sin(;zx/L). We also a s s u m e t h a t
c o n s t a n t C t a k e s value 1, t h e n t h e s e problem becomes a
initial b o u n d a r y value problem defined a s
Utt ^ "xx ; 0 < x < 2 ; t>0 ...(3.12.3)
59
Having calculated the values of Uj .j ; i = l(l)n from
For j = 0 a n d i = 1
4uii+U2j = 1.818177
i =2 uj 1+ 4u2,i+ U31 = 3.458383
i =4 U31+4U41+U51 = 5.595787
160
Table (3.13.1)
Displacement of vibrating string through cubic spline
explicit method
Displacement u(x, t)
X t=0.0 t= 0.05 t=0.1 t= 0.15 t= 0.20 t= 0.25
0.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.2 0.309075 0.308058 0.305190 0.300430 0.2938 0.285341
0.4 0.587786 0.585962 0.580507 0.571453 0.558897 0.542938
0.6 0.809016 0.806508 0.799000 0.786838 0.769760 0.747802
0.8 0.951056 0.948108 0.939282 0.924632 0.904292 0.878408
1.0 1.000000 0.996899 0.987618 0.972214 0.950766 0.923410
1.2 0.951056 0.948108 0.939282 0.924632 0.904292 0.878408
1.4 0.809016 0.806508 0.799000 0.786838 0.769760 0.747802
1.6 0.587786 0.585962 0.580507 0.571453 0.558897 0.542938
1.8 0.309075 0.308058 0.305190 0.300430 0.2938 0.285341
2.0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
1.20OOOO
-^t=QO I
•<-t=Q05
t=0.1 j
-^t=Q15|
^K-t=Q20l
•*-t=Q25i
0.000000
GO 02 0.4 0.6 08 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
X—•
Figure (3.13.1)
Displacement of vibrating string through cubic spline
explicit method
161
3 . 1 3 (B) SPLINE SOLUTIONS WITH IMPLICIT METHOD :
Using t h e s a m e initial a n d b o u n d a r y conditions a n d
t h e v a l u e s of o t h e r p a r a m e t e r s d i s c u s s e d in section (3.13A)
t h e solution of e q u a t i o n (3.12.3) is o b t a i n e d by implicit
formula t h a t is given by t h e e q u a t i o n (3.9.9), derived a s
follows.
For j = 0
i= 1
(0.8125)uo,i+(4.375)ui,i+(0.8125)u2,i
= - { ^ ( " 2 , 0 + 4 u i 0 + Uo,o)}
= 1.823849
S i n c e UQ i = 0
i =2 (0.8125)uii+(4.375)u2,i+(0.8125)u3i= 3.469172
i =4 (0.8125)u3i+(4.375)u4i+(0.8125)u5i= 5.613242
i =5 (0.8125)u4i+(4.375)u5i+(0.8125)u6,i- 5.902113
i =6 (0.8125)u5,+(4.375)u6i+(0.8125)u7i= 5.613242
i =7 (0.8125)u6^i+(4.375)u7i+(0.8125)u8i= 4.774909
i =8 (0.8125)u7i+(4.375)u8i+(0.8125)u9i= 3.469172
i =9 (0.8125)u8i+(4.375)u9i+(0.8125)uio,i= 1.823849
S i n c e Ujo^i = 0
(0.8125)u8i+(4.375)u9i = 1.823849
T h e a b o v e s y s t e m of n i n e e q u a t i o n s i n n i n e u n k n o w n s
with co-efficient m a t r i x t r i - d i a g o n a l o n e , is solved b y
'62
any well known method. Like explicit scheme, once the
value of u are known at first level of time, the process can
be repeated for second time level and so on. The results
obtained by implicit method are given in the table (3.13.2)
and are plotted in figures (3.13.2). Due to the symmetry of
the process results are given for 0 < x < 1 only.
Table (3.13.2)
Displacement of vibrating string through cubic spline
implicit method
Displacement u(x, t)
163
1.20000O
0000000
QO Q2 0.4 Q6 08 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
X •
Figure (3.13.2)
Displacement of vibrating string through cubic spline
implicit method
164
Table 3.13.3
Error analysis
165
0.025000
0.020000
1 0.015000
o ••-UEX-USE
•m— UEX-USI
UJ 0.010000
0.005000
0.000000 i
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Figure (3.13.3(a))
Error Analysis (at t = 0.15)
166
1.200000
1.000000
I 0.800000
••-USE
S 0.600000 n n
-»—UEXT
UJ USI
0.400000
n n
0.200000
0.000000 A -fx
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Figure (3.13.3(b))
Displacement of vibrating string through cubic spline method
(at t = 0.15)
167
3 . 1 4 SPLINE FORMULA TO SOLVE HYPERBOLIC
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION WITH TWO
SPACE VARIABLES :
In e q u a t i o n (3.14.1), c is a c o n s t a n t term, it d e p e n d s
u p o n some physical quantities in case of different types of
problems.
Divide t h e region 0 < x < a into say n s u b - intervals
e a c h of width Ax s u c h t h a t nAx = a , 0 < y < b into m s u b -
intervals e a c h of width Ay s u c h t h a t nAx = b .
The s u b s c r i p t k d e n o t e s t h e time a n d (i, j) denote t h e
position. For simplicity consider s q u a r e region i.e. a = b = L
t h e length of the region, m = n a n d Ax = Ay = h (say). The
p o i n t s of subdivisions are(xj,yj), i, j = 0(l)n.
168
(Uwj,k+i+4u,j,k.i+Ui.,,j,k+,)
...(3.14.4)
where r = cAt/h i, j = 1(1) n - 1
The values of u^j .j's i j = l ( l ) n - l are obtaiined from
following relation
U i . , = u . j , - 2g(x.,yj)At ...(3.14.5)
169
,2^„ , /^ , io,„2>
+ 2[Ui^,j, + 4Uij,+Uj.,j.J
...(3.14.6)
where r = cAt/h ; i,j = l ( l ) n - l
170
sides of t h e portion m a y be t a k e n approximately equal to
Ax and Ay.
TAX
0
x +Ax
Figure (3.15.1)
Vibrating m e m b r a n e
The tension T is the force per u n i t length. Forces
acting on the edges are TAx a n d TAy which could be t a k e n
t a n g e n t to the m e m b r a n e since the m e m b r a n e is perfectly
elastic. Let the force TAy m a k e angles aand^ with t h e
horizontal on t h e opposite edges of the m e m b r a n e since the
m e m b r a n e is perfectly elastic.
The r e s u l t a n t verticad c o m p o n e n t of force d u e to TAy is
therefore,
" (TAy) sin/? - (TAy) sin a
(TAy) tan y^ - (TAy) tan a
= TAy {(du/dx)^,,^ -(du/dx\}
= TAy ( a u ' / a x ' ) A x
u p to a first order approximation. Note t h a t sine have
replaced by t a n g e n t b e c a u s e t h e angles a and /9 are small.
171
Similarly, t h e forces TAx acting on t h e edges of length
Ax c a n be s h o w n to have the vertical component.
TAx {^\l^y^)^y
If m be t h e m a s s per u n i t a r e a of the m e m b r a n e , by
Newton's second law of motion
(mAxAy) d\ I di^ = 1 (a^u / 5x^ + d'^xx I ay^)AxAy
=> a ^ u / a ^ = c^(a^u/ax^ + a^u/ay^) where c^= T / m
...(3.15.1)
The above equation (3.15.1) is hyperbolic PDE in two
space variables x a n d y, a n d time variable t. The solution fro
t h e case of a r e c t a n g u l a r m e m b r a n e is given below by cubic
spline explicit a s well a s implicit m e t h o d u s i n g following
initial a n d b o u n d a r y conditions.
Dirichilet b o u n d a r y conditions :
172
of Uj j.j, i, j = l(l)n form equation (3.14.5), u s i n g initial
Since Uo,i,i = 0
4uu,i+U2,i,i =0.563599
i =2 Ui,i,i+4u2,i,i+U3,i^i =1.072029
i =3 U2,i,i+4u3ii+U4ii = 1.475521
i =5 U4,i^i+4u5ii+U6ii =1.873844
173
Table (3.16.1(a))
Table (3.16.1(b))
174
Figure (3.16.1)
V e l o c i t y distribution in rectangular m e m b r a n e through
cubic spline explicit m e t h o d (at y = 0.1)
175
i = 2 {0.9994)ui 1 i+(4.0012)u2,i,i+(0.9994)u3, 1 =1.072034
Table (3.16.2(a))
176
Table (3.16.2(b))
Figure (3.16.2)
Velocity distribution in rectangular membrane through
cubic spline implicit method (at y = 0.1)
177
3.16 (C) DISCUSSIONS OF RESULTS :
The velocity distribution obtained by the solution of
equation (3.14.1) by cubic spline explicit as well as implicit
methods are compared with exact solutions at y = 0.1 for
t = 0.03 in the table (3.16.3). From the table it is clear that
the solutions obtained by both these methods are accurate
u p to five digits of decimal places. Figure (3.16.3(a))
indicates the error analysis which compares the exact
solutions with spline solutions obtained by both the
methods explicit as well as implicit at t = 0.03 clearly from
the figure (3.16.3(b)), the spline solutions are quite accurate
and reliable.
Table (3.16.3)
Error Analysis
Velocity distribution u -> y = 0.1 & t = 0.03
178
0.0000012
0.0000010
0.0000008
O -•— USE-UEXT
0.0000006
•m— USI-UEXT
m
0.0000004
0.0000002
0.0000000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Figure (3.16.3(a))
Error Analysis (at t = 0.03, y = 0.1)
179
0.000000 ri
QO 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 05
X—•
Figure (3.16.3(b))
Velocity distribution in rectangular membrane through cubic spline implicit method
(aty = 0.1, t = 0.03)
180
3.17 CONCLUSION:
In this chapter the method of spline collocation is
applied to linear PDE of parabolic and hyperbolic type with
one and two space variable. The problem describing flow of
electricity in a cable of transmission line, heat conduction
in a rod ,heat flow in thin rectangular plate, vibrating string,
vibrating membrane are discussed briefly. The governing
equations are parabolic PDE in one and two space variables
as well as hyperbolic PDE in one and two space variables.
All the equations are solved by spline explicit and spline
im^plicit scheme. The results are given in tabular form.
Comparison of the results shows that spline solutions are
quite reliable. The figure provides a pictorial evidence of a
good agreement of the curves presenting actual as well as
approximate solutions. Results are accurate u p to five digits
of decimal place in most of the case.
In all problems, reducing the length of sub-interval
gives more closed results. An ultimate conclusion is drawn
from this work is that, both the method of spline collocation
gives accurate results with compact computations. From the
compairison of results and figure it is conclude that, imiplicit
scheme provide better convergence than explicit scheme.
181