Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 71 views

    Appraisal Form 20-21 Production Final

    Uploaded by

    Omkar
    The document provides an assessment of an employee, Omkar Suresh Dingankar, for the period of 2020-2021. It rates the employee on 14 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest. The employee received ratings ranging from 4 to 5 across all criteria, which included quality, quantity, planning, leadership, dependability, initiative, problem solving, decision making, work relations, adaptability, safety, housekeeping, health, and attendance. The assessment concludes the employee is performing well overall based on the ratings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Appraisal Form 20-21 Production Final

    Uploaded by

    Omkar
    71 views8 pages
    The document provides an assessment of an employee, Omkar Suresh Dingankar, for the period of 2020-2021. It rates the employee on 14 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest. The employee received ratings ranging from 4 to 5 across all criteria, which included quality, quantity, planning, leadership, dependability, initiative, problem solving, decision making, work relations, adaptability, safety, housekeeping, health, and attendance. The assessment concludes the employee is performing well overall based on the ratings.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides an assessment of an employee, Omkar Suresh Dingankar, for the period of 2020-2021. It rates the employee on 14 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest. The employee received ratings ranging from 4 to 5 across all criteria, which included quality, quantity, planning, leadership, dependability, initiative, problem solving, decision making, work relations, adaptability, safety, housekeeping, health, and attendance. The assessment concludes the employee is performing well overall based on the ratings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    71 views8 pages

    Appraisal Form 20-21 Production Final

    Uploaded by

    Omkar
    The document provides an assessment of an employee, Omkar Suresh Dingankar, for the period of 2020-2021. It rates the employee on 14 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest. The employee received ratings ranging from 4 to 5 across all criteria, which included quality, quantity, planning, leadership, dependability, initiative, problem solving, decision making, work relations, adaptability, safety, housekeeping, health, and attendance. The assessment concludes the employee is performing well overall based on the ratings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    CYBERNETIK TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

    ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL / NON TECHNICAL STAFF


    ASSESSMENT PERIOD 2020 - 2021
    TO BE FILLED BY HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
    Name of Employee: Omkar Suresh Dingankar Date Of Joining: 13/07/2020
    Designation: Project Engineer Department: Project

    RATING CRITERIA RATING SCALE

    Respective HOD's will put the 1 to 5 no in respective column while rating the
    criteria. HOD will convey his rating with their subordinates and discuss present 1 - POOR 2 - MARGINAL
    and expected performance.

    1 QUALITY

    1 Ensuring maintenance of quality specification consistently

    2 Restricting scrap and rework within his control

    3 Ensuring care and proper use of tools and equipments

    4 Accuracy and Legibility of required paper work, if any

    OVERALL QUALITY PERFORMANCE RATING 4.25

    2 QUANTITY

    1 Volume of output on standard work (routine)

    2 Volume of output on related/ additional/ non standard work

    OVERALL QUANTITY PERFORMANCE RATING 5

    3 PLANNING / ORGANISING ABILITY

    1 Capacity to plan ahead

    2 Ability to distinguish important / unimportant work and carry out


    plan in logical sequence
    3 Ability to anticipate / prevent / solve problems

    4 Ability to organise to cope up with special situations or load

    OVERALL PLANNING / ORGANISING ABILITY RATING 4.75

    4 LEADERSHIP

    1 Sensitivity / Sociability and concern for others


    2 Recognition of subordinates and harmonising

    3 Training and developing subordinates

    4 Communication skills - Internal & External

    5 Inspiring co-operation, promoting team work

    OVERALL LEADERSHIP RATING 4.80

    5 DEPENDABILITY

    1 Consistency and predictability

    Performance with minimum supervision, promptness and


    2 correctness
    3 Performance on difficult assignments

    4 Willingness to use extra efforts to solve a critical problem.

    OVERALL DEPENDABILITY RATING 4.5

    6 INITIATIVE

    1 Willingness and attempts to be versatile

    2 Efforts on his own to achieve results

    3 Suggestion and development of new and worthwise ideas and


    methods
    4 Passing on job knowledge to inexperienced employees

    5 Reporting problems and potential problems

    OVERALL INITIATIVE RATING 4.8

    7 PROBLEM SOLVING

    1 Ability to analyse the problem

    2 Reporting problems and potential problems

    3 Ability to predict the problem and act accordingly

    4 Ability to resolve the problem in a stipulated time

    OVERALL PROBLEM SOLVING RATING 4.5

    8 DECISION MAKING

    1 Identify critical factors which will affect the outcome of a decision

    2 Evaluate options accurately and establish priorities.


    3 Ability to take decision in difficult situation

    OVERALL DECISION MAKING RATING 4.67

    9 WORK RELATION

    1 Attitude towards fellow employees

    2 Attitude towards management

    3 Attitude towards company policies and procedures

    4 Willingness to accept change

    OVERALL WORK RELATIONS RATING 5

    10 ADAPTABILITY

    1 Ability to perform other work in the department

    2 Application of job knowledge to a new or unfamiliar work

    3 Learning speed

    OVERALL ADAPTABILITY RATING 5.00

    11 SAFETY

    1 Attitude to safe work- practices / procedures

    2 Ensuring subordinates follow safety rules / procedures (using


    machine guards / personal protective equipments etc.)
    3 Taking preventive / corrective steps to remove safety hazards

    4 Ensuring accident free working in his area

    OVERALL SAFETY RATING 5

    12 HOUSEKEEPING

    1 Cleanliness of work area, work station, desk, shop floor

    Cleanliness & maintenance of equipments and tools, material (in-


    2 process components / consumables)

    OVERALL HOUSEKEEPING RATING 4

    13 HEALTH

    1 State of health for performing his job effectively

    OVERALL HEALTH RATING 5

    14 ATTENDANCE
    1 Overall Attendance during the year

    OVERALL ATTENDANCE RATING 4.00

    15 OVERALL ASSESSMENT #REF!


    GENRAL REMARKS : (Highlight strength / defeciencies not covered and any other observation. Also please comment on potential for better perfo
    16 as for growth)

    17 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REGARDS HIS SHORT COMINGS, IF ANY

    18 ALREADY TAKEN: RECOMMENDED TO BE TAK

    19 Based on the above please Identify Training / Developmental needs and specify action plans if any :

    APPRAISEE DEPARTMENT HEAD HR & ADMIN HEAD

    NAME &
    DESIGNATION

    SIGNATURE

    DATE
    TE LIMITED

    CAL STAFF

    NT
    7/2020

    RATING SCALE

    3 - AVERAGE 4 - ABOVE 5 - GOOD


    AVERAGE

    4.25

    4.75

    5
    5

    4.80

    4.5

    4.8

    4.5

    5
    5

    4.67

    5.00

    5
    4

    4.00

    #REF!
    omment on potential for better performance in present position as well

    RECOMMENDED TO BE TAKEN:

    any :

    ADMIN HEAD PLANT HEAD

    You might also like