Capital Budgeting Answer
Capital Budgeting Answer
Capital Budgeting Answer
CAPITAL BUDGETING
ANSWERS
Question 1
ThusProjectAshouldberejectedandonlytwo-thirdofProjectDbeundertaken.Ifthe
projects are not divisible then other combinations can be examinedas
Although from NPV point of view Project cupcakes appears to be better but from
IRR point of view Project jelly appears to be better. Since, both projects have
unequal lives selection on the basis of these two methods shall not be proper. In
such situation we shall use any of the following method:
i. Replacement Chain (Common Life) Method: Since the life of the Project cupcake
is 6 years and Project jelly is 3 years to equalize lives we can have second
opportunity of investing in project jelly after one time investing. The position of
cash flows in such situation shall be as follows:
NPV of extended life of 6 years of Project jelly shall be ` 8,82,403 and IRR of
25.20%. Accordingly, with extended life NPV of Project jelly it appears to be
more attractive.
ii. Equivalent Annualized Criterion : The method discussed above has one
drawback when we have to compare two projects one has a life of 3 years and
other has 5 years. In such case the above method shall require analysis of a
period of 15 years i.e. common multiple of these two values. The simple solution
to this problem is use of Equivalent Annualised Criterion involving following
steps:
c. Divide NPV computed under step (a) by PVAF as computed under step (b)
and compare the values.
Page2
Accordingly, for proposal under consideration:
Project A Project B
NPV @ 12% ` 6,49,094 `5,15,488
PVAF @12% 4.112 2.402
Equivalent Annualized Criterion `1,57,854 `2,14,608
Thus, Project jelly should be selected.
Page3
Question 3
Statement showing the Evaluation of Two Machines
Machines A B
Purchase cost (`): (i) 1,50,000 1,00,000
Life of machines (years) 3 2
Running cost of machine per year (`): (ii) 40,000 60,000
Cumulative present value factor for 1-3 years @ 10%: (iii) 2.486 -
Cumulative present value factor for 1-2 years @ 10%: (iv) - 1.735
Present value of running cost of machines (`): (v) 99,440 1,04,100
[(ii) × (iii)] [(ii) × (iv)]
Cash outflow of machines (`): (vi)=(i) +(v) 2,49,440 2,04,100
Equivalent present value of annual cash outflow 1,00,338 1,17,637
[(vi)÷(iii)] [(vi) ÷(iv)]
Decision: Company rainbow should buy machine A since its equivalent cash
outflow is less than machine B.
Page4
Question 4
i. Initial CashOutflow:
Amount (`)
Cost of new machine 60,00,000
Less: Sale Price of existing machine 1,50,000
Net of Tax (`2,50,0100 × 0.60) 58,50,000
a. NewMachine
Amount (`)
Salvage value of Machine 2,50,000
Less: Depreciated WDV 2,50,000
{`60,00,000 - (`11,50,000 × 5
years)}
STCG Nil
Tax Nil
Net Salvage Value (cash flows) 2,50,000
b. OldMachine
Cash realised on disposal of existing machine after ` 35,000 Additional cash
flows atterminal year = ` 2,15,000 (2,50,000-35,000)
Page5
6. Less:Depreciation
60 , 00 , 000 2 , 50 , 000 11,50,000
5
7. Earning after
18,90,000
depreciation beforeTax
8. Less: Tax@40% 7,56,000
9. Earning after
11,34,000
depreciation andTax
10 .Add:Depreciation 11,50,000
11. Net Cash inflow 22,84,000
Alternatively
** As mention in the question WDV of Machine is zero for tax purpose hence no
depreciation shall be provided in existing machine.
Page6
ii. Computation of NPV @ 15%
Period Cash flow PVF PV (`)
(`)
Incremental cash flows 1-5 22,84,000 3.352 76,55,968
Add; Terminal yearcash 5 2,15,000 0.4972 1,06,898
77,62,866
Less: Additional cash 0 58,50,000 1
58,50,000
outflow
NPV 19,12,866
Page7
Question 5
`
Cost of new machine 10,00,000
Less: Sale proceeds of existing 2,00,000
machine 8,00,000
Net initial cash outflows
Page8
iv. Calculation of Net PresentValue
`
Present value of annual net cash
Inflows: 1 – 8 years = ` 3,00,000 × 4.968 14,90,400
Add: Present value of salvage value of new machine at
the end of 8th year (` 40,000 × 0.404) 16,160
Total present value 15,06,560
Less: Net Initial Cash Outflows 8,00,000
NPV 7,06,560
Alternative Solution:
Page9
Question 6
Advise: Since the net present value is negative and profitability index is also
less than 1, therefore, the hospital should not purchase the diagnostic machine.
Note: Since the tax rate is not mentioned in the question, therefore, it is
assumed to be 30 percent in the given solution.
Page10
Question 7
i. NPV of theProject
Page11
Question 8
Working Notes:
1. Computation of AnnualDepreciation-
Particulars `
Purchase Price 26,00,000
Add:1. Installation Charges 9,000
2. Fees Paid to Consultant for Advice 6,000
Total Cost of New Machine 26,15,000
Useful Life 8 Years
Annual Depreciation (Total Cost/No. of Years) 3,26,875
2. Computation of Annual Cash Savings-
Particulars `
Annual Earnings 3,15,000
Less-Tax @35% 1,10,250
Earning after Tax 2,04,750
Add-Depreciation on New Machine 3,26,875
Annual Cash Savings 5,31,625
Particulars `
Proceeds of Sale 12,500
Less: Cost of Removal 4,500
Net Proceeds 8,000
Less: WDV 76,000
Net Loss due to Sale 68,000
Tax savings due to Loss on Sale@35% 23,800
Total Cash Inflow due to Sale (` 8,000+` 23,800) 31,800
Page12
4. Computation of Net Present Value
Page13
Question 9
Page14
Since NPV is positive love airs Ltd. should accept the project.
Page15
Question 10
Page16
Question 11
Working Notes:
Page17
Question 12
Since Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) is least in case of system A hence same
should be opted.
Page18