Design and Analysis of Remotely Amphibious Drone
Design and Analysis of Remotely Amphibious Drone
Design and Analysis of Remotely Amphibious Drone
net/publication/339815131
CITATIONS READS
0 1,693
1 author:
Jeyasimman Duraisamy
Periyar Maniammai University
34 PUBLICATIONS 240 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jeyasimman Duraisamy on 10 March 2020.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: E2137039520/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.E2137.039520 & Sciences Publication
284
Design and Analysis of Remotely Amphibious Drone
By changing the motor speed, the drone can perform yaw, 3Ah * 40C = 120 A which is greater than 72 A, hence battery
roll, and pitch operation, the lit and torque produced by this is sufficient.
motor can be adjusted to get a better experience [16].
D. Flight Control Board
Based on literature the design prototype needs to be in
low volume so that transition between medium will be easier, The KK 2.1.5 microcontroller has an incredibly
in order to study the outcome, several simulations will be sensitive MPU 6050 system, making the drone a more stable
carried out for both aerial and aquatic medium the ability to and auto-level function it contains an Atmel Mega 64PA 8 bit
withstand the water pressure is also simulated. To take the AVR RISC-based microcontroller with the memory of 64k
control of motor speed the KK 2.1.5 microcontroller is used [17].
because of wide availability and the coat is quite low, the E. Modeling of Frame and Casing
KK2.1.5 microcontroller can adjust the PID function inside
A computer-based system is used for analyzing
the computer and the PID values depend upon the motor
creating and modifying the drone, the detailed design process
characteristics [17].
was done in Autodesk Fusion 360.
The propeller is a fan that transmits power by
converting rotational motion of the motor into thrust, a
pressure difference is produced between rare and forward
surface of the blade, it is like an airfoil shape that produces
lift.
The communication part is quite challenging and
complicated for comparing freshwater and seawater, for the
freshwater 0.04 s/m is the conductivity and 400 s/m for
seawater, which is 100 times greater than the freshwater, the
signal will be reflected during seawater propagation. Here the
normal quadcopter transmission can also be used for an
amphibious drone for the larger distance an extra floating
body can be used for modulation and demodulation. [6, 18].
During the development of a prototype, software plays
a vital role; design a body frame is easy for a normal drone.
But design a body frame that can easily transition between
both mediums is difficult and challenging, by using Figure 1 Design of the UAV casing
computer-aided drawing software Autodesk fusion 360 and
CATIA. Based on Figure 1 design is done by AutoCAD
This software makes quickly sketched out the ideas for fusion 360 software. The design consists of blended shape in
designers and also provides a detailed drawing. Generally, the forward and backward which makes easier to transition in
Autodesk fusion 360 and CATIA provide an easy operation to both medium and also provides space for electronics
create models and assembly, the drafting of the prototype is components and payload. This casing is only for electronic
done of Autodesk fusion 360 and assembly on CATIA components except for brushless dc motor which is
software. It is a very challenging practice that the prototype waterproof. The design has two parts top and bottom and
needs to satisfy the requirement in both medium [9]. This connected with screws and silicone water sealant.
draft is comprised of many other parts such as base platform,
arms, top cover and propellers every part of the drone is
sketched by part by part, after getting all parts assembly
feature is used to assemble and combine the parts.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: E2137039520/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.E2137.039520 & Sciences Publication
285
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE)
ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-5, March 2020
Thus, it can push air and water when needed and also able to
produce thrust.
From Figures 3 and 4 the stress analysis is simulated by using
CATIA software, in both analyses, the pressure is
withstanding when 500N of force is applied on the frame for
better results. The maximum stress that can withstand is
13.8KPa. From these results, pressure withstands when the
transition between medium occurs.
IV. CONCLUSION
As a conclusion, the high density with low volume body will
help to reduce the time for transition in mediums, the
buoyancy force is low in the low volume high-density body,
and thus the drone model is aimed designed to minimize total
volume, to increase the speed movement of the vehicle in both
Figure 4 Stress analysis in steel alloy medium. The mechanism and drone design are taken into
account. To attain better maneuverability, the drag that is the
From Figures 5 and 6 gives the displacement resistance faced by the drone has to be minimized, large
analysis, during the analysis 500N force is applied. Aluminum surface area leads to more drag that will affect the total speed
shows 18.66mm and steel shows 6.15mm.both values are and consume more power, for that the blended cylindrical
expected and fulfilled the objective for the selection process. body is designed, besides, the quadcopter concept is also
In this analysis, steel provides a better result by giving low implemented, which give low resistance, high-pressure
displacement. While the transition between the medium operation and compact. At this stage design concept and
occurs, the density changes drastically and thereby frame planning of the prototype are done. To testify this some
should not break down. simulation, virtual teat and real-time tests have to be done. By
the help of computer-aided technology, stress test and
deflection of the frame is carried out. The results from that
give a satisfying outcome.
REFERENCES
1. Hong-jian, W., Long, X., Juan, L., & Hui-nan, Z. (2013, June). Design,
construction of a small unmanned underwater vehicle. In 2013
MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
2. Wang, W. H., Chen, X. Q., Marburg, A., Chase, J. G., & Hann, C. E.
(2008, October). A low-cost unmanned underwater vehicle prototype
for shallow water tasks. In 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference
on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (pp.
204-209). IEEE.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: E2137039520/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.E2137.039520 & Sciences Publication
286
Design and Analysis of Remotely Amphibious Drone
AUTHORS PROFILE
Published By:
Retrieval Number: E2137039520/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.E2137.039520 & Sciences Publication
View publication stats
287