Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 58 views

    DESIGN OF Cross Girder (XG) (ROAD Way Bridges)

    Uploaded by

    Karim Nasser
    The document summarizes the design of a cross girder for a roadway bridge. It outlines the steps to calculate the dead load, live load, and impact effects. The maximum bending moment and shear are calculated. An HEB 1000 section is selected which is checked for compactness, bending capacity, shear capacity, and lateral torsional buckling. The section is found to be adequate based on the design checks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    DESIGN OF Cross Girder (XG) (ROAD Way Bridges)

    Uploaded by

    Karim Nasser
    58 views14 pages
    The document summarizes the design of a cross girder for a roadway bridge. It outlines the steps to calculate the dead load, live load, and impact effects. The maximum bending moment and shear are calculated. An HEB 1000 section is selected which is checked for compactness, bending capacity, shear capacity, and lateral torsional buckling. The section is found to be adequate based on the design checks.

    Original Title

    سكشن ٣ استيل

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the design of a cross girder for a roadway bridge. It outlines the steps to calculate the dead load, live load, and impact effects. The maximum bending moment and shear are calculated. An HEB 1000 section is selected which is checked for compactness, bending capacity, shear capacity, and lateral torsional buckling. The section is found to be adequate based on the design checks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    58 views14 pages

    DESIGN OF Cross Girder (XG) (ROAD Way Bridges)

    Uploaded by

    Karim Nasser
    The document summarizes the design of a cross girder for a roadway bridge. It outlines the steps to calculate the dead load, live load, and impact effects. The maximum bending moment and shear are calculated. An HEB 1000 section is selected which is checked for compactness, bending capacity, shear capacity, and lateral torsional buckling. The section is found to be adequate based on the design checks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 14

    Tanta University Design of Metallic Bridges [b]

    Faculty of Engineering CSE 4238


    Structural Engineering Department Second Semester

    DESIGN OF Cross Girder (XG) [ROAD


    WAY BRIDGES]
    Load transfer

    RC slab

    Stringer

    X.G

    M.G

    Bearings
    Example:
    [1] Dead Load:
    Assume
    ▪ O.W of XG 300 Kg/m’

    ▪ Dead load reaction from stringer 𝐑𝐃

    𝒂
    𝐑 𝐃 = 𝐖𝐃 ∗ ∗ 𝟐 = 𝐖𝐃 ∗ 𝐚
    𝟐
    𝟏𝟎𝟎+𝟕𝟎𝟎 𝑺 𝟏𝟎𝟎+𝟕𝟎𝟎 ∗𝟐.𝟐
    = ∗𝒂= ∗ 𝟓 = 𝟖. 𝟐 𝒕
    𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎
    [1] Dead Load: 𝐑 𝐃 = 𝟖. 𝟐 𝒕

    𝑸𝑫 = 𝟐𝟔. 𝟒𝟓 𝒕

    𝑴𝑫 @ 𝒎𝒊𝒅 𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒏 = 𝟔𝟗. 𝟗𝟖 𝒕. 𝒎


    Strip 2

    Strip 5
    Strip 1

    Strip 4
    Strip 3
    [2] Live Load + Impact:

    𝑳𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝟏 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝟐 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝟑


    X.G
    Direction of Str &MG
    Direction of motion

    X.G

    X.G

    𝑆. 𝑊. 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑅𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑆. 𝑊. 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ


    [2] Live Load + Impact:
    [2] Live Load + Impact:
    [2] Live Load + Impact: (Case of max +ve moment)

    𝑴𝑳+𝑰 @ 𝒎𝒊𝒅 𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒏 = 𝟐𝟕𝟔. 𝟐𝟖 𝒕. 𝒎


    [2] Live Load + Impact: (Case of max Shear)

    𝑸𝑳+𝑰 = 𝟖𝟓. 𝟕𝟗 𝒕
    [3] Final straining actions:

    𝑴𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 = 𝑴𝑫 + 𝑴𝑳+𝑰 = 𝟔𝟗. 𝟗𝟖 + 𝟐𝟕𝟔. 𝟐𝟖 = 𝟑𝟒𝟔. 𝟐𝟔 𝒕. 𝒎

    𝑸𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 = 𝑸𝑫 + 𝑸𝑳+𝑰 = 𝟐𝟔. 𝟒𝟓 + 𝟖𝟓. 𝟕𝟗 = 𝟏𝟏𝟐. 𝟐𝟒 𝒕


    [4] Design of section:
    𝑰 𝑨𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏

    𝑭𝒔𝒓 𝟏. 𝟔𝟖 𝒕 𝟐
    𝑭𝒎𝒂𝒙 = = = 𝟐. 𝟏 ≯ 𝟎. 𝟔𝟒𝑭 𝒚 = 𝟐. 𝟑 𝒕/𝒄𝒎
    𝑴𝑫 𝟔𝟗. 𝟗𝟖 𝒄𝒎 𝟐
    𝟏− 𝟏−
    𝑴𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 𝟑𝟒𝟔. 𝟐𝟔 30cm

    4cm
    𝑴𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 𝟑𝟒𝟔. 𝟐𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎
    𝒁𝒙 = = = 𝟏𝟔𝟒𝟖𝟗 𝒄𝒎𝟑
    𝑭𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝟐. 𝟏

    120 cm
    2 cm
    𝑪𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝑯𝑬𝑩 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒔, 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒘𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒂𝒃𝒖𝒊𝒍𝒕 𝒖𝒑 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏

    𝑯𝑬𝑩 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒁𝒙 = 𝟏𝟐𝟖𝟗𝟎 𝒄𝒎𝟑 𝒖𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒇𝒆

    𝟑𝟎 × 𝟒𝟑 𝟐 𝟐 × 𝟏𝟏𝟐𝟑
    𝟐∗ + 𝟑𝟎 ∗ 𝟒 ∗ 𝟓𝟖 +
    𝑰𝒙 𝟏𝟐 𝟏𝟐
    𝒁𝒙 = = = 𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟔𝟒 𝒄𝒎𝟑
    𝒚 𝟔𝟎
    [4] Design of section:
    30cm
    𝑰𝑰 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 of section

    4cm
    𝑪 𝟏𝟒 𝟏𝟔.𝟗 𝟏𝟔.𝟗
    - Flange = = 𝟑. 𝟓 < = = 𝟖. 𝟗𝟏 The flange is compact
    𝒕𝒇 𝟒 𝒇𝒚 𝟑.𝟔

    120 cm
    𝒉𝒘 𝟏𝟏𝟐 𝟏𝟐𝟕 𝟏𝟐𝟕 2 cm
    - web = = 𝟓𝟔 < = = 𝟔𝟔. 𝟗 The web is compact
    𝒕𝒘 𝟐 𝒇𝒚 𝟑.𝟔

    The section is compact


    𝑰𝑰𝑰 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝒃𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈

    𝑴𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 𝟑𝟒𝟔.𝟐𝟔×𝟏𝟎𝟎
    𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕 = = = 𝟏. 𝟗𝟗 𝒕/ 𝒄𝒎𝟐 < 𝑭𝒎𝒂𝒙 Ok safe
    𝒛𝒙 𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟔𝟒
    [4] Design of section:
    30cm
    𝑰𝑽 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝑺𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓

    4cm
    𝑸𝑫+𝑳+𝑰 𝟏𝟏𝟐. 𝟐𝟒
    𝒒𝒂𝒄𝒕 = = = 𝟎. 𝟓 𝒕/ 𝒄𝒎𝟐
    𝒅𝒘 ∗ 𝒕𝒘 𝟏𝟏𝟐 ∗ 𝟐

    120 cm
    2 cm
    𝒒𝒂𝒍𝒍 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟓 ∗ 𝑭𝒚 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟓 ∗ 𝟑. 𝟔 = 𝟏. 𝟐𝟔 𝒕/ 𝒄𝒎𝟐
    𝒒𝒂𝒄𝒕 < 𝒒𝒂𝒍𝒍 Ok safe
    𝑽 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝑳𝑻𝑩
    𝑳𝒖 = 𝟐𝟐𝟎 𝒄𝒎
    𝟐𝟎𝒃𝒇 𝟐𝟎∗𝟑𝟎
    ❑ = = 316 cm > 𝑳𝒖
    𝒇𝒚 𝟑.𝟔

    𝟏𝟑𝟖𝟎 𝑨𝒇 𝟏𝟑𝟖𝟎∗𝟑𝟎∗𝟒
    ❑ 𝒄𝒃 = *1.13 = 433.17 cm > 𝑳𝒖
    𝒅𝑭𝒚 𝟏𝟐𝟎∗𝟑.𝟔

    𝑵𝒐 𝑳𝑻𝑩 𝑭𝑳𝑻𝑩 = 𝑭𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟒 ∗ 𝒇𝒚

    You might also like