Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Tutorial 9

    Uploaded by

    Alango Jr Tz
    1. A binary FSK system transmitting at 2.5x106 bits/s in white Gaussian noise with power spectral density of 10-20 W/Hz will have an average probability of symbol error of 0.85x10-3. 2. The transmission bandwidth reduction of 256-QAM compared to 64-QAM is 1/4. 3. A 16-PSK system requires an Eb/No of 17.6 dB for a symbol error probability of 10-3, while a 16-QAM system only needs an Eb/No of 21.5 dB, which is 3.9 dB less than the 16-PSK system.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Tutorial 9

    Uploaded by

    Alango Jr Tz
    30 views4 pages
    1. A binary FSK system transmitting at 2.5x106 bits/s in white Gaussian noise with power spectral density of 10-20 W/Hz will have an average probability of symbol error of 0.85x10-3. 2. The transmission bandwidth reduction of 256-QAM compared to 64-QAM is 1/4. 3. A 16-PSK system requires an Eb/No of 17.6 dB for a symbol error probability of 10-3, while a 16-QAM system only needs an Eb/No of 21.5 dB, which is 3.9 dB less than the 16-PSK system.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. A binary FSK system transmitting at 2.5x106 bits/s in white Gaussian noise with power spectral density of 10-20 W/Hz will have an average probability of symbol error of 0.85x10-3. 2. The transmission bandwidth reduction of 256-QAM compared to 64-QAM is 1/4. 3. A 16-PSK system requires an Eb/No of 17.6 dB for a symbol error probability of 10-3, while a 16-QAM system only needs an Eb/No of 21.5 dB, which is 3.9 dB less than the 16-PSK system.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    30 views4 pages

    Tutorial 9

    Uploaded by

    Alango Jr Tz
    1. A binary FSK system transmitting at 2.5x106 bits/s in white Gaussian noise with power spectral density of 10-20 W/Hz will have an average probability of symbol error of 0.85x10-3. 2. The transmission bandwidth reduction of 256-QAM compared to 64-QAM is 1/4. 3. A 16-PSK system requires an Eb/No of 17.6 dB for a symbol error probability of 10-3, while a 16-QAM system only needs an Eb/No of 21.5 dB, which is 3.9 dB less than the 16-PSK system.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    Passband Data Transmission

    FSK
    1. A coherent binary FSK system transmits binary data at the rate of 2.5x106 bits per
    second. During the course of transmission, white Gaussian noise of zero mean and
    power spectral density 10-20 W/Hz is added to the signal. In the absence of noise, the
    amplitude of the received sinusoidal wave for digit 1 or 0 is 1mV. Determine the
    average probability of symbol error.
    2
    e−x
    Given: erfc( x) ≈ for large x
    πx
    QAM
    2. Determine the transmission bandwidth reduction of 256-QAM, compared to 64-
    QAM. (The transmission bandwidth is defined as the null-to-null bandwidth)
    3. Two passband data transmission systems are to be compared. One system uses 16-
    PSK, and the other uses 16-QAM. Both systems are required to produce an average
    probability of symbol error equal to 10-3. Compare the signal-to-noise ratio
    requirement of these two systems.

    Comparison of Digital Modulation Schemes


    4. Binary data are transmitted over a microwave link at the rate of 106 b/s, and the
    power spectral density of the noise at the receiver input is 10-10 W/Hz. Find the
    average carrier power required to maintain an average probability of error Pe ≤ 10 −4
    for (a) coherent binary PSK and (b) DPSK
    1 − Eb / N o
    Geven: The average BER for DPSK is e
    2

    5. The values of Eb / N o required to realize an average probability of symbol error


    Pe = 10 −4 using coherent binary PSK is 7.2. Using the approximation
    1
    erfc(u ) = exp(−u 2 )
    πu
    determine the separation in the values of Eb / N o for Pe = 10 −4 , using coherent
    binary PSK and DPSK

    1
    10
    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    2
    Solution:

    1. Tb = 1 / 2.5 × 10 6 = 0.4µs

    Eb =
    1 2
    2
    1
    2
    ( 2
    )
    Ac Tb = 10 −3 0.4 × 10 −6 = 2 × 10 −13 J

    Pe =
    1
    2
    ( )1
    ( )
    erfc Eb / 2 N o = erfc 2 × 10 −13 / 2 × 10 − 20 = ... = 0.85 × 10 −3
    2

    2. The transmission bandwidth of M-ary QAM signal is


    2 Rb
    .
    log 2 M
    Thus the bandwidth reduction is
    2 Rb 2 Rb R R R
    B64 − B256 = − = b − b = b
    log 2 64 log 2 256 4 8 8

    3. The probability of symbol error of M-ary QAM is given by

     1   3E av 
    Pe = 21 −  erfc 

     M  2( M − 1) N o 
    E av
    Setting Pe = 10 −3 and M=16, we get = 58 = 17.6dB .
    No

    The probability of symbol error of M-ary PSK is given by


     E 
    Pe = erfc sin(π / M )  .
     No 
    E
    Setting Pe = 10 −3 and M=16, we get = 142 = 21.5dB .
    No
    Hence, on the average, the 16-PSK demands 21.5 -17.6 = 3,9 dB more symbol energy
    than the 16-QAM for Pe = 10 −3 .

    3
    4. For Pe = 10 −4 , the Eb / N o of the binary PSK system is 7.0. Hence E b = 3.5 × 10 −10 . The
    required average carrier power is 0.35 mW.
    For Pe = 10 −4 , the Eb / N o of the DPSK system is 8.5. Hence Eb = 4.3 × 10 −10 . The required
    average carrier power is 0.43 mW.

    5. For a coherent PSK system, the average probability of error is

    Pe =
    1
    2
    erfc[ (E b / N o )1 ]
    For a DPSK system, we have
    1
    Pe = exp[−(Eb / N o )2 ]
    2
    For Pe = 10 −4 , (Eb / N o )1 = 7.2 =8.6 dB and (Eb / N o )2 = 8.5 = 9.3 dB. The separation is 0.7
    dB.

    You might also like