ANPQP Version 3.

2 Revision

ANPQP Management Team

Nissan Internal
Introduction:

Renault-Nissan Alliance updated this 3.2 ANPQP version on

following perspectives;

 Improvement for more user friendly

 Renault & Nissan Convergence
 Clearer explanation
 Consistency with both company’s operation

Nissan Internal
Agenda

1, Overview of 3.2 Revision Items

2, Revision Contents

3, Time line for version 3.2 launch and Project Application

Nissan Internal
1, Overview of 3.2 Revision Items (1/2)
Revision contents were classified into 3 categories.
Revision Classification
User Friendly
Revision Contents Revision Contents Requirement/ Consistency
/
template with
Clear
revision operation
explanation
Component Supply Chain Added tierN capacity information inside template.
2.1 ✔ ✔
Chart Changed submission level & timing.
Supplier Production
Added FVC/T2000 column / revised formula.
Preparation Monitoring ✔ ✔
Changed submission level & timing.
3.2 Plan/Status Report
Agreed NNA/NE template as alliance template.
Production Capacity Plan ✔ ✔
Changed submission level & timing.
Change List/DRBFM Work
4.2 Column of “Parts” & “Function of the parts“ are re- categorized. ✔
Sheet
4.3 QA table A/B QA table A/B becomes alliance template. ✔(Renault)
Special characteristics Added the link to important A/B/C/OBD. ✔
4.5
COC/COP Changed submission level & timing. ✔
Gauge specification and Split into Gauge specification sheet and Gauge approval sheet.
5.2 ✔
approval Changed submission level.
Sprit into process self audit and capacity self audit.
5.5 Full Volume Confirmation Registered template for process self audit in the matrix. ✔ ✔
Changed submission level. Nissan Internal
1, Overview of 3.2 Revision Items (2/2)
Revision Background
Revision Contents Revision Contents Requirement/t
Consistency
User Friendly /
emplate Clear
with operation
revision explanation

5.6 Ramp up activity plan Integrate Concern and countermeasure report into 8D report. ✔

5.7 Traceability Added Renault/Nissan traceability requirement. ✔

Inspection Report Added special characteristics requirement inside DCI. ✔

6.1
Supplier Test Plan and
Added special characteristics column inside DCI/template. ✔
Report
Revised condition to start mass production.
7.1 Parts Submission Warrant ✔ ✔
Agreed alliance PSW requirement.

8.1 8D Report Added columns / comments to be strengthen. ✔

10.1 Logistics and Packaging Revised submission level. ✔

Submission level Changed submission level definition. ✔

Record retention Converged to Renault’s record retention period. ✔

Parts number detail Added site information column inside template. ✔

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
2.1 Components Supply Chain Chart (1/2)
 Revision Point
1. Submission level changed to (2) in phase2 and added (2) in phase 3.

Ver 3.1
2. Sub-Supplier Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
2.1 Sub-Supplier
CSCC 2 2 2 2 2 2
Management

Ver 3.2

2. Sub-Supplier Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
2.1 Sub-Supplier
CSCC (2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2) 2 2 2
Management
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents

2.1 Components Supply Chain Chart (2/2)

 Revision Point Added to check

1. Added the column to check Tier N capacity risk. Tier N capacity
risk.
Ver. 3.1 Ver. 3.2

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
2.1 Components Supply Chain Chart (2/2)

 Revision Point
2. Added the column to check Tier N capacity risk .

Development
Supplier Feature

Tier N Capacity Confirmed?

Component Annual Volume
experience of the
Tier N supplier
Product Structure Manufacturing Plant (Where the supplier
has development)

Comments
(Tier N)
and Vehicle Model

Y/N
Location

Manufacturer
Development
Supplier

Experience
Name

Vehicle
Quantity of Plant
Component Name
Tier 5…N Country
(per Level 1
Assembly)

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents

3.2 Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan/Status Report (1/2)

 Revision Point
1. Added FVC (T2000) column in project milestone.

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
3.2 Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan/Status Report (2/2)
 Revision Point
2. Changed submission level to (2) in phase 2.

Ver 3.1
3. Project Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
3.2 Project Planning and
Production Preparation SPPMP/SR 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2
Monirotring
Ver 3.2

3. Project Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
3.2 Project Planning and
Production Preparation SPPMP/SR (2)(2)(2) 3 2 2 3 2 2
Monitoring
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
3.2 Production Capacity Plan (1/2)
 Revision Point
1. Changed submission level to 1 in phase 2, (1) in phase 3 and 4.

Ver 3.1
3. Project Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
3.2 Project Planning and
Production Preparation Production Capacity Plan 3 2 2 3 2 2
Monirotring
Ver 3.2

3. Project Management Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
3.2 Project Planning and
Production
Production Preparation 1 1 1 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
Capacity Plan
Monitoring
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
3.2 Production Capacity Plan (2/2)
 Revision Point
2. Revised the template to describe the detailed information, which is able to identify
bottleneck process automatically.
3. Added the sheet to study shared capacity.
4. Added the T2000 template which judges OK/NG automatically.
Ver 3.2
Ver 3.1
ANPQP - 生産能力計画書

ルノー/日産　プロジェクト名 　 　Nissan Impt A Impt B Impt C OBD 帳票管理NO. /　改定No.

Safety
帳票改定日
Regulation Renault 1 2
帳票初回発行日
サプライヤ名 サプライヤコード E-mailアドレス
サプライヤ工場 帳票の作成者名 帳票の作成者の電話番号
部品名称 メモ
部品番号、発行レベル

Process specification
設計通知番号/DEVO
ハッチング欄は自動計算で記入されます

工程/作業情報 能力計画
(ANPQP : 生産能力計画書帳票) (ANPQP : 生産能力計画書帳票)
工程番号 次の工程 工程名 機械・設 本工程で生 最終製 本工程で 基準サイク 部品の数 (生産実績をも この工程で このあとの 時間当たり シフト当た 1週間当た 合計週当 機械/機器 最終製品に 最終製品に 現在の週

information ⇒
( 以下参照 備のタイ 産される部 品の部 生産される ルタイム とにした)平均 の廃却率 工程も含め 生産能力 り稼働時 りのシフト たり稼働時 の数 おけるル 占める部品 次生産能
又は、 工程 プ 品の名前 品番号 部品の名 （秒） 稼働率 （％） た廃却率 (自動計算) 間 の数 間 ノー・日産向 の数(当該作 力
フローチャート 前 （廃却を含まな (自動計算) （OEE計算 (自動計算) け生産アロ 業における) (最終製品
番号 ) い） と同じベー ケーション比 相当)
ス) 率(%)

Process specification information 0.00% 0.0

Identify bottleneck Added template for
Added the sheet to
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0

process T2000 mass

0.00% 0.0

(1 line=1 process)
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0

study shared
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0

automatically. production trial.

0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0

capacity with other

0.00% 0.0

適用詳細:
年間生産能力 RFQ 要求ボリューム ギャップ
作業者の数 1日の稼働シフト
廃却率 0.00% 1日の稼働時間 - JPH

OEMs.
Mixの制約 1年の稼働日 - 1年の稼働日 0 RFQ 要求ボリューム (年間)
段取り替え時間 - 1日の稼働シフト 0
段取り替えの頻度 - シフトの稼働時間 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Overaライン全体としてのスペック算出
- OEE予測 (スクラップ率を除く) (%) 0.0%
設備稼働率
- このあとの工程も含めた廃却率
0.00%
生産用 予測される型の耐用寿命 - 生産の中に占める当該製品の占有率 100%
サービス部品用 効率レベル
その他の顧客用

(Weak linkage with above)

Free 年間生産ボリューム #DIV/0!

Completed by: Review Frequency:

Signed: Date: Next Review Date:

Nissan Internal
4.2 Change List/DRBFM Work Sheet (1/2)
 Revision point
In comparison of parts by parts, it is difficult to realize an essential changing point in terms of functional design,
but in comparison the structures by structures that constitute the function, it becomes easier to realize a
changing point affecting a function. “Parts” & “Function of the part” are re categorized as below.

Ver 3.1 DRBFM Worksheet

Change List
Parts Function of Base Design Function of
Parts Newness
the parts the parts

Ver 3.2 Change List DRBFM Worksheet

System/Part Function Base Design System/Part

Functional Functional Newness Function
Portion name Portion name

Nissan Internal
4.2 Change List/DRBFM Point of Quick DR
Work Sheet (2/2) For each functional portion, consider an essential change.

O-ring seal structure In comparison of parts by parts, it is difficult to realize an

essential changing point in terms of functional design
O-ring Changes to design
Parts Function Base Design New Design Newness
and their objectives
Cylinder Cylinder Constitute No change；Carry 1
inner wall of over
piston sliding
surface
Fluid
Piston Change the Part processing 2
pressure by method change
Piston reciprocating (conventional
in cylinder method)

O-ring Seal between No change；Carry 1

cylinder and over
piston

Surface pressure In comparison the structures by structures that constitute the function,
design Point of view it becomes easier to realize a changing point affecting a function.
Changes to design
Parts Function Base Design New Design Newness
and their objectives
Seal Prevent Decrease of seal 3
structure fluid Hydraulic pressure -0 Hydraulic pressure -0
interference due to
leakage variations in
processing methods

Reduced surface
Lower limit of Lower limit of pressure ー□□Pa
surface surface
pressure○○Pa pressure△△Pa
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
4.3 QA table A/B
 Revision point
Apply QA table A/B as Alliance template.
Ver 3.1
4. Product Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
4.3 Identification and
QA table A Nissan (2) (2) (2)
Deployment of Special
Characteristics and Key
QA table B Nissan (2) (2) (2)
Features

Ver 3.2
4. Product Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
4.3 Identification and QA table A (2)(2)(2)
Deployment of Special
Characteristics and Key QA table B (2)(2)(2)
Features
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
4.5 Special Characteristic Management (1/2)
 Revision Point
1. Add the linkage to Nissan Important A/B/C/ OBD definition and requirements.
Identification
Title block of the drawing Body of the drawing Significance of the symbols
/ Cover Page / Related documents
Ver3.1
The symbol
Product with “n” safety special characteristics.
appears “n” times
Product with “n” safety special characteristics and “m” regulatory characteristics.
The symbol appears
“n” or “m” times totally Note: In case a safety characteristic is at the same time linked with Regulatory
Characteristics defined by both Renault/Nissan.
Other Special Characteristics
•Refer to Ver. 3.0 for Nissan Imp.A/B/C/OBD or regulatory definition and requirements.

Identification
Title block of the drawing Body of the drawing Significance of the symbols
/ Cover Page / Related documents
Ver3.2 The symbol
Product with “n” safety special characteristics.
appears “n” times
Product with “n” safety special characteristics and “m” regulatory characteristics.
The symbol appears
“n” or “m” times totally Note: In case a safety characteristic is at the same time linked with Regulatory
Characteristics defined by both Renault/Nissan.
Other Special Characteristics
Link to Nissan Imp.A/B/C/OBD or regulatory definition and requirements.
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
4.5 Special Characteristic Management (2/2)

 Revision Point
2. Changed submission level to add (2) in phase 5.
Ver 3.1
4. Product Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Certificate of Certification
4.5 Special Characteristic
Mnagement
(COC)/Conformity of (2) (2) (2)
Product (COP)

Ver 3.2

4. Product Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Certificate of
4.5 Special Characteristic
Certification
Management
(COC)/Conformity of
(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)
Product (COP Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
5.3 Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet

 Revision Point
1. Split into Gauge Specification Sheet and Gauge Approval Sheet.
2. Submission level changed to (2) in Phase2 and (1) in Phase3.

5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

V 3.1
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
5.3 Tooling, Gauge
Gauge Specification
and Facility 3 2 2 3 1 1
and Approval Sheet
Management

V 3.2

5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
5.3 Tooling, Gauge Gauge Specification (2) (2) (2)
and Facility Sheet
Management Gauge Approval Sheet (1) (1) (1)
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
5.5 Confirmation of Full Volume Conditions
 Revision Point
1. Split into ASPQSR and Capacity Self Audit.
2. Include ASPQSR inside Matrix and changed submission level to (2) in for MH parts.
3. T2000 Self Capacity Audit Sheet will be provided from regional SCM/SRMT, and changed
submission level to (2) for all parts.
5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Ver. 3.1
5.5 Confirmation of Full Volume Full Volume Confirmation
3 2 2
Conditions Audit Results

Ver. 3.2

5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H

5.5 Confirmation ASPQSR（Supplier Self check ） 3 (2) (2)

of Full Volume
Conditions T2000 Self Capacity Audit Sheet (2) (2) (2)
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
5.6 Ramp up Activity Plan
 Revision Point
1. Agreed Allianace template for Ramp up Activity Plan.
2. Integrate Concern and countermeasure report during Ramp-Up into 8D report.

Ver. 3.1
5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Ram-Up Activity Plan (RUAP) 3 2 2
5.6 Activities
during Ramp-Up Ramp-Up Activity Concern and
(2) (2) (2)
Countermeasure Report (RUACCR)

Ver. 3.2

5. Manufacturing Process Development Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H

5.6 Activities Ram-Up Activity Plan

3 2 2
during Ramp-Up (RUAP)
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
5.7 Identification and Traceability
 Revision Point
1. Added red sentence to Notes.
2. Added traceability parts scope and control method inside supplier portal (Japan).
Ver 3.2
Note(s)： Supplier Portal

For Renault; Supplier is required to apply the standard 01 33 300. Unit 注記

＊代表部番(上5
桁）
項目 注記
＊代表部番(上5
桁）
項目

For Nissan; For specific parts, supplier is

Engine / Rear axle /
*1 10001/10100 *2 43100
エンジン リアアクスル
Electric motor (motor) *Alternative to engine / ECM (Engine Control Module) /
*1 290J0 *3 23710
駆動用モーター エンジンコントロールユニット
Power train

required to apply the standard provided by

Transmission / Transmission ECU (Transmission control unit) /
/ *1 31020 *3 31036
トランスミッション トランスミッション コントロールユニット
Suspension
Transfer / DIFF LOCK control unit /
*1 33100 *3 28496
トランスファー デフロックコントロールユニット
Front axle / Transfer control unit /
*2 40100 *3 33084

Nissan separately.
フロントアクスル トランスファーコントロールユニット
Cylinder block / Camshaft /
*3 11000 *3 13020
シリンダーブロック カムシャフト
Cylinder head / Fuel pump /
*3 11041 *3 17040
シリンダーヘッド 燃料ポンプ
Engine
/
Fuel Fuel tank /
*3 12201 *3 17201/17202
燃料タンク

Parts Scope
Connecting rod / Fuel pump control unit /
*3 12100 *3 17001
コンロッド 燃料ポンプコントロールユニット
Steering gear(GEAR & LNKG) / Steering Wheel Angle Sensor /
*2 48001/49001 *3 47945
ステアリングギア ステアリングアングルセンサ
Steering column / EPS(Electronic Power Steering) unit /
Steering *3 46080/48822 *3 28500
ステアリングコラム 電制パワステユニット
SBW(Steering By Wire) control unit /
*3 28505/285H0
ステアリングバイワイヤコントロールユニット
Airbag module(Dr, Assist, Side, Curtain..) / Airbag Control Unit /
*2 98510/98515/.. *2 28556/98820
エアバッグモジュール(インフレーター) エアバッグコントロールユニット
Airbag
Popup engine hood actuator / 98581/98830 Sensor(crash zone sensor, OCS, etc...) /
*2 25344 *2
ポップアップエンジンフードアクチュエーター 98850/etc.… 各種エアバッグセンサー
LBC (High-voltage battery pack) / LBC (High-voltage battery pack) ECU /
*2 295B0 *2 295B0
リチウムイオンバッテリーパック リチウムイオンバッテリーパックコントローラー
部品ラベルの場合 ECUへの書き込みの場合
Onboard charger / DC/DC converter /
*2 296B1 *2 292A0
車載充電器 DC/DC コンバーター
Decelerator / Inverter /
*2 32010 *2 291A0下記表示とする。ただし、従来一品管理部品として適用され、既に
減速機 インバーター
旧表示で運用されている部品で新たに手配または変更手配される
EV/HEV *2 36010/36035 PBW (park-by-wire) ACTR *2 36032ものについては、日産の関係部署と調整の上、表示方法を決定す
PBW (park-by-wire) ECU 新規部品に関しては下記表示とする。ただし、従来一品管理部品として適用され、既
ること。 に旧表示で運用されている部品で新たに手配または変更手配されるものについては、
*2 36010/36035 e-PKB (Parking brake) ACTR *2 36032 e-PKB (Parking brake) ECU 日産の関係部署と調整の上、表示方法を決定すること。
尚、部品ラベルの仕様(QR Code、バーコード、サイズ)は日産の
関係部署に確認すること。
*2 46007 e-ACT (electric booster) ACTR *2 46007 e-ACT (electric booster) ECU

PTC heater /
*2 27143
PTCヒーター

表示は英数字を含み最大20桁とする。
ABS(Anti-lock Braking System) unit/

Control
*3
Brake booster Assy /
*3
(Ⅰ) 部品番号
VDC(Vehicle
(10桁) Dynamics Controller) unit/
Brake 47210
ブレーキブースター Assy
47660
ESC(Electronic Stability Control) control unit / 表示は最大20桁とする。(NDS#:25953NDS28)
(Ⅱ) 区切り記号‘T’ (1桁)
ABS/VDC/ESC/コントロールユニット
表示方法 (Ⅲ) 一連番号 (4桁～9桁) ……… 　特定可能な一連番号となっ
(Ⅰ) ECU一連番号 (20桁)……(ECU Serial Number)
IDM control unit / ていること (ADAS用)CAMERA Control UNIT /
*3 476A0 *3 284G3
IDMコントロールユニット (尚、年、月周期で、順序番号がデフォルトに
(ADAS用)カメラコントロールユニット 戻る等、特定が困難
になる可能性が有る場合は製造年、製造月の情報を含める)

Method
ADAS(Advanced Driver Assist System) ECU / ICC SENSOR UNIT /
*3 284E7 *3 28438
ADASコントロールユニット ICC センサーユニット

Rader sensor unit / SONAR Control Unit /

*3 284K0/284K1 *3 28532
レーダーセンサユニット ソナーコントロールユニット
Driving Support
TPMS(Tires Pressure Monitoring System) unit / Yaw Rate Sensor / Gravity Sensor /
*3 40720 *3 47930 表示は最大16桁とする。(NDS#:25953NDS07)
TPMSユニット ヨーレートセンサー、グラビティセンサー
(Ⅰ) 部品品種コード (1～3桁目)………… (日産の生産技術部に
Camera Control Unit (AVM) /
*3 284A1
カメラコントロールユニット(AVM)
確認すること) (Ⅰ) 部品品種コード (3～5桁目) ……（日産の生産技術部に確認すること)
(Ⅱ) ライン番号
IPDM /
(4桁目) 　　 ………… サプライヤ製造ラインを英 (Ⅱ) 工場コード (6桁目)　　 …… 任意で設定可能
BCM(Body Control Module) [with I-KEY] / 数字で対応させる。 (Ⅲ) ライン番号 (7桁目) 　　 ……　任意で設定可能。
Body *3 284B1 *3 284B7/284B6 イ ン テ リ ジ ェ ン ト パ ワ ー デ ィ ス トリ ブー ショ ンモ
ボディコントロールモジュール 旧表示方法
(Ⅲ) 製造月ジュール (5桁目) 　　　　 ………… 1～12月を1～9、X、Y、Zで (Ⅳ) 製造年 (8～9桁目)　　　　 …… 西暦の下2桁を対応させる
28185対応させる。
HVAC control unit / Car radio / (Ⅴ) 製造月 (10桁目)） 　　　……　1～12月を1～9、X、Y、Zに対応させる。
*3 27760 *3
HVACコントロールユニット ラジオ
(Ⅳ) 生産順序番号 (6～10桁目) ………… 数字5桁連番。月毎に (Ⅵ) シリアル番号 (11～16桁目) ……　任意で設定可能。6 桁連番または日付2桁
Meter(Dashboard Instrument Panel) / ‘00001’に戻る。
TCU(Telematics control unit) / ＋シリアル４桁も可能。
Electronic *3 24810 *3 28275/283B0
メーター テレマティックコントロールユニット (Ⅶ) フリー (17～18桁目)　　 ……　任意で設定可能。
Navigation control unit / e-call control unit(only Russia) /
*3 25915 *3 28275
ナビゲーションコントロールユニット e-call コントロールユニット

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
6.1 Supplier Test Plan and Report、Inspection Report
 Revision Point
1. Added column for special characteristics on Supplier Test Plan and Report.
2. Added red sentence on Supplier Test Plan and Report and Inspection Report .
Supplier Test Plan and Report Supplier Test Plan and Report
Inspection Report

Minimum Content Requirement(s)：

 Identification of Special Characteristics.

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
7.1 Production Part Approval (1/2)
 Revision Point;
1. Changed the wording to avoid misunderstanding that “Part Approval” could be interpreted
as a full PSW is mandatory for mass production and shipping.
Ver 3.1
Note:
• Mass production starting in supplier is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is provided.
• Shipment to Renault/Nissan of product is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is
provided

Ver 3.2
Note:
• Mass production start and shipping of its parts to Renault/Nissan is not acceptable
until interim or full Production Part Approval is provided.
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
7.1 Part Submission Warrant
 Revision Point
2. Communized PSW requirements with Renault, added “Ramp up activity plan”, “Certificate of
homologation” and “ASPQR result and Action result” and deleted “LPDS”.

Ver 3.2

Items attached to Submission Warrant

□ Control Plan □ Drawing □ Certificate of homologation

□ Process Flow Chart □ Component Supply Chain Chart □ Design/Process/Facility site Change Request

Inspection Report (including IMDS

□ □ Gauge Specification/Approval Sheet □ Full Volume Confirmation Audit Result(self)
ID)
Sub-components Part Submission
□ Supplier Test Plan & Report □
Warrant
□ ASPQR result and Action result
□ Process Capability Study Result □ Parts □ Process FMEA

Appearance Approval Report/Styling

□ □ Design Note □ Others
Approval

□ Part Number Details □ Ramp up activity plan

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
8.1 8D Report
 Revision Point
Added the red columns / comments to be strengthen.
.
4. Temporary Countermeasures - Immediate Action
Temporary Countermeasure Details: Delivery Date for 1st OK parts after temporary countermeasure
Delivery Reference for 1st OK parts after temporary
countermeasure
How are OK parts identified?
Sorting activity lessons:
Comments on NOK Parts production (In which shift, on which equipment, by which worker, which day)
5. Final Analysis
Turn on/Turn off to the Root Cause confirmation / Reproduce the defect (actions done to reproduce the defect, does the root cause is really verified, …)

5 WHY Analysis to identify root cause *Consider: Man, Material, Machine, Method, Who, Where When Why, How, Process settings, Rework, Maintenance etc. Attach extra detail sheets where necessary
Why was the non conformity not
1 Why was the non conformity made? 2
detected?
hy hy hy

hy hy hy

hy hy hy

hy hy hy

hy hy hy
W W W

W W W

W W W

W W W

W W W
? ? ?

? ? ?

? ? ?

? ? ?

? ? ?
Root Cause:
Responsibility Responsibility Responsibility Responsibility Responsibility

1 Department Department Department 2 Department

Department
5M identified 5M identified 5M identified 5M identified 5M identified
6. Permanent Countermeasures
What actions have been taken to prevent the manufacture of reject parts in the future? *Consider: Error proofing, Testing, Process Control etc.
Root cause / Actions Responsibility Department Timing

7. Countermeasure Confirmation
Confirmation that firewall can be removed (provide results : charts, qty of defects …), as results are satisfactory
Have the countermeasures implemented been confirmed as effective?
Countermeasure Action Confirmation method

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
10.1 Logistics and Packing
 Revision Point
1. Submission level changed to (2) in phase 2 and (1) in phase 3.
Ver 3.1

10. Logistics and Packing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
10.1 Logistics and Logistics and Packing
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Packing Data Sheet

Ver 3.2

10. Logistics and Packing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
10.1 Logistics and Logistics and Packing
2 2 2 (2) (2) (2) (1) (1) (1) 1 1 1
Packing Data Sheet
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Submission Level Definition change
 Revision Point
1. Simplify the table to show as below.
2. Added red sentence to () definition
Ver 3.1 Complete document Submit document Obtain approval

1 Must Must Must

(1) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests

2 Must Must N/A

(2) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests N/A

3 Must If Renault/Nissan requests N/A

Ver 3.2

Complete document Submit document Obtain approval

1 Must Must Must

2 Must Must N/A

3 Must If Renault/Nissan requests N/A

() if Renault or Nissan request or in case of any change according to "9. Change Management"
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Retention Period
 Revision Point
Communize with Renault record retention period.

Ver 3.1
Renault records Nissan records Period

Important A/B or OBD records 10 years

Japan and
Refer to the Renault standard Americas
Other records 3 years
00 10 415

Europe All records 12 years

Ver 3.2

records Period

Special Characteristics records 15 years after EOP

Other records 3 years after EOP

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Parts Number Detail
 Revision Point
Added the columns to provide site information such as Manufacturing address etc.

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Other minor revisions (1/3)
 Revision Content;
1. Update from ISO/TS to IATF.
Alliance Policy
Suppliers are required to comply with all ISO/TS 16949 requirements.

Suppliers are required to comply with all IATF 16949 requirements.

 Revision Contents;
2. Changed the name of output document.

4.2 Design Potential FMEA  Design FMEA

5.1 Process Potential FMEA  Process FMEA

Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Other minor revisions (2/3)
 Revision Content;
3. Updated red sentences to fit into actual operations.

Introduction
 Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP) is the alliance procedure that has been developed to define the
Renault-Nissan requirements for suppliers from the initial project planning phase, through the Start of Product (SOP),
to the End of Product (EOP) life.
 ANPQP is published in three languages; English, French and Japanese. The English version is the master and should be
referred to when clarification of any requirements is necessary.
 Senior Management commitment to support fully the achievement of all project goal and target…

 Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP) has been developed to define the Renault-Nissan
requirements for suppliers from the initial project planning phase, through the Start of Product
(SOP), to the End of Product (EOP) life.

 ANPQP is agreed in English. The English version is the master and should be referred to when
clarification of any requirements is necessary.

 Top Management commitment to support fully the achievement of all project goal and target…
Nissan Internal
2, Revision Contents
Other minor revisions (3/3)
 Revision Content;
4. Updated examples according to change of the templates.

5. Updated Logo

6. Rewording phase key events by view point of parts development.

Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 1 Phase 1
Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements
Review and Review and Review and Review and
Planning
Phase 2 Ver 3.1 Planning Planning
Phase 2 Ver 3.2
Planning

Request For Design Part Request For Design

Quotation Completion Submission Quotation Completion
(RFQ) Warrant Feedbac (RFQ) Feedbac
Phase 3 (PSW) k Phase 3 k
Sourcing Off Tool Result Supplier Off Tool Result
Confirmation Nomination
Phase 4 Design Phase 4
Tooling Off Process release Off Process
Release / Tooling go
Phase 5 Phase 5
Ramp-Up & ahead Ramp-Up &
Off Tool Mass Production Off Tool Mass Production
Confirmation Confirmation
Part
Start Of Submission
Production Warrant
(SOP) (PSW)
Nissan Internal
3, Version 3.2 Deployment and Application Schedule
FY 2019 FY 2020

Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr.

Web Portal Web site launch

Training

JPN plants

Oversea regions

Project application

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

Supplier PSW
RFQ
nomination Design release
New project
(before sourcing)

On going project

ANPQP 3.2 application Nissan Internal