Mard
Mard
Mard
First I would like to thank Ato Demeke Desta for providing me with necessary
information and positions, brotherly approach and there in valuable suggestion &
comments during the preparation of the project with an intention to achieve my
work.
Last but not last acknowledgement is also made to the valuable contributions
and,comments by my advisor Ato Kenfi Tsegay.
LIST OF ABBREPATIONS
P M -preventive maintenance
N F-number of failures
N-number of workers
A-availability of machines
U-unavailability of machines
BR-benefit ratio
Even if the company has been applying these maintenance systems, it is not to
say fully-effective. The company has got many problems on maintenance systems, some
of which include
CONTENT PAGE
Acknowledgment……………………………………………………………………1
List of abbreviation…………………………………………………………………2
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….3
Chapter-one
1. Introduction
1.1. Background of the company……………………………………..6
1.2. Background and justification…………………………………….6
1.3. Objective of the study………………………………………………..8
1.3.1. General objective……………………………………………….8
1.3.2. Specific objective……………………………………………….8
1.4. Methodology…………………………………………………………...8
1.5. Scope of the study…………………………………………………….8
Chapter-two
2. Literature review
2.1. Maintenance…………………………………………………………9
2.1.1. The importance of maintenance…………………………….9
2.1.2. Why does maintenance exist?........................................9
2.2. Preventive maintenance …………………………………………10
2.3. Principles of reliability…………………………………………...11
2.3.1. The meaning of reliability……………………………………11
2.3.2. Practical reliability definitions ……………………………..11
2.3.2.1. Non repairable items …………………………………11
2.3.2.2. Repairable items ………………………………………12
2.3.3. The meaning of availability …………………………………14
2.4. Maintenance costing ……………………………………………..15
2.4.1. Maintenance labor cost estimation ……………………….16
2.4.2. Spare part cost estimation ………………………………….16
Chapter-three
Chapter-four
Bibliography …………………………………………………………………………36
List of tables
Pantograph machine……………………………………………………………….17
Pantograph machine………………………………………………………………..18
0xygen plant...………………………………………………………………………..21
0xygen plant………………………………………………………………………….22
CHAPTER-ONE
1. Introduction
1.1. Background of the company
Oxygen plant 29 9 20
Acetylene plant 26 9 18
Pantograph 17 9 8 -ve variance is good
Gasparini shear 10 9 1
Band saw 7 9 -1
Small Rolling 6 9 -3
Notching 6 9 -3
Omag shear 5 9 -4
Milling Machine 4 9 -5
Gasparini Bending 3 9 -6
Machine Down Time
Top 4 unavailable machines
Since most of spare parts were used for corrective maintenance work and MIE’s
production order based, we were unable to plan ahead.
The company has got many problems on maintenance system, some of which
include:-
Introducing the reliability concepts on current system that help to improve and to
increase the profit of the organization by allocating optimum maintenance costs on
pantograph machine and oxygen plant with utilization of maintenance techniques
and costs.
1.4 METHODOLOGIES
Data collection
The data collection process was conducted in the two perspectives of data types,
which include:-primary data
Secondary data
MTBF
MDT/MTTR
Machine availability and unavailability
Figures and tables
The project scope is limited to some selective machines whose function of operation
influence the process of production most. These machines are pantograph (MPs),
oxygen plants and, extend to improve the reliability of Machines through labor cost
and spare cost estimation.
CHAPTER TWO
2. Literature review
2.1. Maintenance
The work must be, as priority one, directed on to avoid failures and by this reduce
the risks for unplanned stops.
Or
The answer to this question is obvious, but not for everybody. Some still believe that
the objective of maintenance is to repair damaged equipment. This approach is very
costly and crates a lot of problems for the maintenance and production department.
Poor maintenance of equipment will result in deterioration and the worn out period will arrive much
earlier than for well maintained equipment.
Preventive maintenance covers all programmed maintenance which is carried out in order to
prevent the occurrence of failures or to detect failures before they develop to a break down or
interruptions in productions.
As could be seen from the definition, the preventive maintenance is divided into two other parts i.e.
Preventive maintenance which done to prevent the occurrence of failure and preventive maintenance
which is done to detect failures before they develop in to a break down or disturbances in the
production
The part were measures are taken to prevent the occurrence of failures is called direct preventive
maintenance. The reason why this preventive maintenance is called direct preventive maintenance is
because the condition of the equipment will improve directly. There is a direct impact of the machine.
Some examples of jobs which are direct preventive maintenance are programmed replacement of
parts, overhauls, lubrication, oil change and cleaning.
Direct preventive maintenance is also called fixed time maintenance because it is totally controlled by
time.
The other part of preventive maintenance is called indirect preventive maintenance and is carried out
to find the failures in an early stage of development. The indirect preventive maintenance can be done
the condition of equipment or inspect it to find out the condition level.
Indirect Preventive maintenance is also called condition monitoring .The performance of the indirect
preventive maintenance is also controlled by the time but it is done in order to find out the actual need
of maintenance.
Preventive maintenance
Indirect direct
R(t)+F(t)=1
We can now discuss the relationship between reliability and quality. The
reliability of the product is its ability to retain its quality as time progresses.
Thus a product can only have high quality if it also has high reliability; high
initial quality is of little use if it is soon lost. The opposite is, however, not true;
a product with a high reliability does not necessarily have high quality, but
may be merely retaining low quality over a long period of time.
2.3.2. Practical reliability definitions
R (t) and F (t) are dependent on time; it is useful to have measures of
reliability which are in dependent of time. We will consider two cases:- in the
first the items are non-repairable and in the second the items are repairable.
2.3.2.1. Non-repairable item
Suppose that N individual items of a given non-repairable products are placed
in service and the times at which failures occur are recorded during a test
interval T. We further assume that all the N items fail during T and that the i th
failure occurs at time T i that is, T i is the survival time or up time for the i th
, ,
i=N
failure. The total up time for N failures is therefore ∑ T i and the mean time
,
i=1
i.e 1
i=N
MTTF= ∑ Ti
.
,
N i=1
The mean failure rate λ is correspondingly given by:
Number of failures
Mean failure rate=
Total up time
i=1
There N survivors at time t=0, N-i at time t=T i ,,
decreasing to zero at time t=T; figure 1(a) show how the probability of survival,
(N −i)
i.e., reliability, Ri = decreases from Ri=1 at t=0, to Ri=0 at t=T. The i th
N
1 T
rectangle has height and length T i and area i . Therefore equation 1 we
N N
have:
MTTF=Total area under the graph
In the limit that N ∞, The discrete reliability function Ri becomes the
T
continuous function R (t).the area under R(t) is ∫ R (t) d t so that we have in
0
general;
T
MTTF=∫ R (t) d t
0
The failure pattern for N items of a repairable product observed over at a test
interval T. The down time T DJ associated with the j th failure is the total time that
elapses between the occurrence of the failure and the repaired item being put back
j =N F
into normal operation. The total down time for N F Failure is therefore ∑ T DJ and the
j=1
MDT=
j= N F
1
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
The total up time can be found by subtracting the total down time from N T , i.e
j =N F
total up time= N T - ∑ T DJ
j=1
The mean up time or the mean time between failures (MTBF) is therefore given by:
Total up time
Mean time between failures=
Number of failures
i.e.
MTBF=
N T−¿ NFMDT
¿
NF
i.e.
(N-1)/N
(N-2)/N
R (t)
(N-i)/N
2/N
1/N
0 time, t
(a)
1 up down up down up
2 up down up
3 up down up
4 up down up
5 up down up
6 Test time (T)
(b)
The availability of the product is the fraction of the total test interval that it is
performing within specification, i.e. up; thus we have:
Total up time
Availability=
Test interval
Total up time
=
Total up time+Total down time
NF
= ∗MTBF
N F∗MTBF+ N F∗MDT
i.e.
Giving;
Reasons for maintenance costs, Factors influencing maintenance costs, some of the
reasons for maintenance costing are as follows:
Many factors influence maintenance costs including asset condition (i.e. age, type, and condition),
operator expertise and experience, company policy, type of service, skills of maintenance personnel,
equipment specification and regulatory controls.
Operating budget is concerned with itemizing each category of operating expenses forecasting for
every department in the organization. The purpose of this type of budget is to control normal
operating labor, material and overhead costs forecasted for the coming fiscal year.
With a historical approach, the budget is based on historical perspective. Professionals involved in the
preparation of this type of budget rely on the experience of earlier years to determine cost estimates
for the coming year. This approach is efficient, rational, and requires a relatively small amount of paper
work. The main drawback is that past errors tend to be perpetuated and ineffective operations are
funded proportionally to effective ones.
The labor cost is an important component of the maintenance cost. Labor costs are made of pay roll
information that is usually obtained from labor distribution reports prepared by the accounting
department. The information is required for four key areas:
BR=benefit ratio
N=Number of employees
The cost of maintenance material is an important component of the total maintenance cost. Well-
planned and efficiently operated stock and storerooms can significantly reduce the cost of materials as
the costs of successive inventory and obsolete materials parts are important factors in most
maintenance storerooms and stockrooms.
CHAPTER THREE
DATA ANALYSIS
The result and discussions are obtained by conducting the following analysis:-
Calculating total down time, MDT, and mean repair rate (µ).
Calculating total up time, MTBF, mean failure rate (λ) ;
With an assumption of:-
The machine operator starts work (operating the machine) sequentially after
the machine has been maintained without idleness.
The Maintenance personal perform their tasks continuously without any
break unless it is lunch time.
A working hour of 1 shift, 8 hour; 1 hour of the total working hours for break
due to lunch, and twice of 30 minutes each working day for tea time.-
For the case of machine break down, if the date/time of job compilation is
not written I assume that the job is received by the customer in the next day,
morning.
3.1. Total down time, MDT, Repair rate (µ).
Number of
Year failures
happened;
2010 15
2009 5
2008 13
2007 11
In 2010
j =N F
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=12:35+1:30+1+0:45+1:40+3:00+8:35+4:00+10:00+0:40+3:00+3:00+3:00+7:39+9:30
=69.9hr
In 2009
j=5
Total down time=∑ T DJ
j=1
=4:45+10:00+5:00+1:40+6:25
=27.8hr
In 2008
j =13
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=7:00+2:30+4:35+7:05+2:20+28:25+12:25+2:30+2:15+1:50+2:05+0:25+0:35
=74:00hr
In 2007
j =14
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=0:15+2:20+1:35+1:40+0:50+3:11+7:05+36:43+1:30+5:20+0:50
=61.25hr
In 2007
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j=11
1 1
= ∑ T DJ = *61.23=5.566hr
11 j=1 11
In 2008
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j =13
1 1
=
13
∑ T DJ = 13 *74=5.6925hr
j=1
In 2009
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j=5
1 1
= ∑ T DJ = *27.833=5.5666hrµ
5 j=1 5
In 2010
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j =15
1 1
=
15
∑ T DJ = 15 *69.9=4.66hr
j=1
In 2011
MDT=?
5.566+5.6923+5.566+ 4.66
MDT 2011 = =5.371
4
1 1
µ2011= = =0.1862per hour.
MDT 5.371
0r,
1 1
µ2007=¿ ¿ = =0.1799 per hour.
MDT 5.566
µ 1
1
2008=¿ ¿= =0.17568 per hour.
MDT 5.6923
µ 1
1
2009=¿ ¿= =0.1799 per hour.
MDT 5.566
µ 1
1
2010=¿ ¿= =0.2146 per hour.
MDT 4.66
0.1799+0.17568+0.1799+0.2146
µ2011= =0.1874 per hour.
4
In a table,
year No of failures Total down MDT(hr/month) µ(1/hr)
time(hr/year)
Therefore, we can say that MIE of the maintenance department need to accomplish the break down activities of
pantograph machine with an average time of 5.371 hr
Number of
Year failures
happened;
2010 27
2009 20
2008 10
2007 13
2006 21
In 2010
j =N F
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=2:00+1:30+1:30+6:00+1:30+5:15+4:20+5:00+6:30+22:00+1:00+3:30+2:30+2:00+4:00+6:30+5:50+7:00
+8:20+27:00+12:25+0:30+1:00+6:30+0:45+5:00+12:30
=161.92hr
In 2009
j =20
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=0:30+0:40+10:30+11:20+0:35+1:50+1:50+18:00+1:00+1:00+53:35+23:00+7:00+
2:30+8:10+8:30+1:50+5:44+7:25+2:30
=169.733hr
In 2008
j =10
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=3:00+0:35+1:50+4:30+0:35+2:40+2:30+6:75+15:35+6:30
=44.92hr
In 2007
j =13
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=6:00+2:50+6:40+10:30+7:30+14:00+7:30+1:00+7:00+10:00+13:00+6:00+1:45
=93.75hr
In 2006
j =21
Total down time= ∑ T DJ
j=1
=10:00+13:00+12:00+48:00+3:00+8:40+14:20+1:45+4:40+2:30+4:00+17:40+11:20
+2:30+4:40+26:35+0:50+0:40+1:10+6:00+0:30
=193.833hr
In 2006
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j=21
1 1
= ∑ T DJ = 21 *193.833=9.2301hr/month
21 j=1
In 2007
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j =13
1 1
= ∑ T DJ = 13 *93.75=7.212hr/month
13 j=1
In 2008
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j =10
1 1
= ∑ T DJ = 10 *44.92=4.492hr/month
10 j=1
In 2009
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j =20
1 1
= ∑ T DJ= 20 *169.733=8.487hr/month
20 j=1
In 2010
j= N F
1
MDT=
NF
∑ T DJ
j=1
j=27
1 1
= ∑ T DJ= 27 *161.92=5.99703hr/month
27 j=1
In 2011
MDT=?
In general,
1 1
µ2006=¿ ¿ = =0.10834 per hour.
MDT 9.2301
1 1
µ2007=¿ ¿ = =0.13866per hour.
MDT 7.212
µ 1
1
2008=¿ ¿= =0.22262per hour.
MDT 4.492
µ 1
1
2009=¿ ¿= =0.11783 per hour.
MDT 8.487
µ 1
1
2010=¿ ¿= =0.16675per hour.
MDT 5.99703
µ2011=¿¿?
In a table,
- Pm check list report voucher (MWRV) to get the time taken due to periodic
maintenance.
- Break down report voucher (MORV) to get the time elapsed due to sudden
machine break down.
Up UP UP
Down Down
From this,
-Total availability time per year= {no hours per year} – {(time lost due to public holiday) +
(Sundays, Saturdays (afternoon)) + (annual, sick and mortality)}
= 2920hr- 724hr-200hr
= 1996hr/year
-To calculate total down time due to PM (T Dt ) pm
i=N
T Dt = ∑ T D pm where N =number of data
pm t i
i=1
In 2010
i=N i=9
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =1:20+1:00+1:30+1:00+1:00+1:00+1:30+9:00+1:30=18.8334hr
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
i=N
T D pm 18.833hr
T Dt Permonth= ∑
i=1 = t i
=2.0926
pm
9
N
In 2009
i=N i=6
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =8:20+3:00+4:45+2:00+8:30+11:45=38.333hr
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
i=N
T D pm 38.333 hr
T Dt Per month= ∑
i=1 = t i
= 6.388
pm
6
N
In 2008
i=N i=4
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =8:30+10:30+8:00+12:00=39hr
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
i=N
T D pm 39 hr
T Dt Per month= ∑
i=1 = t i
=9.75
pm
4
N
In 2006
i=N i=8
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =2:55+4:00+5:25+2:50+5:00+3:00+4:00+3:00
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
=34.166hr
i=N
T D pm 34.166 HR
T Dt Per month= ∑
i=1 = t i
=4.271
pm
8
N
In table;
Taking the average; the pantograph machine takes a down time for performing a periodic maintenance
4.271+9.75+6.3889+ 2.0926
T Dt =5.626hr/month
pm
4
Input data:
year No of failure Total down
time(hr/year)
2007 11 61.23
2008 13 74
2009 5 27.833
2010 15 69.9
61.23+74+27.833+69.9
T Dt = =58.24075hr/year
Bm
4
Therefore,
=1870.292hr/year
Table
1 1
λ= = =0.00588failure/hour
MTBF 170.0265hr /failure
In 2010
i=7
T Dt =∑ T D pm =2:00+3:30+2:30+2:30+2:30+3:25+3:20=19.75hr
pm t i
i=1
i=N
T D pm 19.75hr
T Dt Permonth= ∑
i=1 = t i
=2.8214hr/month
pm
7
N
In 2009
i=N i=3
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =2:00+3:35+6:30+=12.0833hr
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
i=N
T D pm 12.083hr
T Dt Per month= ∑
i=1 = t i
= 4.0277hr/month
pm
3
N
In 2007
i=N i=3
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =2:30+3:00+7:30=13hr.
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
i=N
T Dt Per month= ∑ T D pm 13
i=1 = =4.333hr/montht i
pm
3
N
In 2oo6
i=N i=8
T Dt = ∑ T D pm = ∑ T D pm =7:00+7:00+7:00+5:50+6:00+4:30+5:00+5:00
pm t i t i
i=1 i=1
= 47.333hr
i=N
T D pm 47.333
T Dt Per month= ∑
i=1 = t i
=5.9166hr/month
pm
8
N
In table;
Taking the average; the pantograph machine takes a down time for performing a periodic maintenance
70.9992+51.9996+48.333204 +33.8568
T Dt = =51.297hr/year
pm
4
5.9166+4.333+ 4.027767+2.8214
T Dt =4.2hr/month
pm
4
Input data:
193.833+ 93.75+44.92+169.733+161.92
T Dt = =132.8312hr/year
Bdm
5
Therefore,
=1811.8718hr/year
Table
Year No of failures 21+ 13+10+20+27
The average no of failures per year= =18.2failures
2006 21 5
2007 13
2008 10 MTBF= = =100.6596hr/failure
2009 20 Total up time 1811.8718
2010 27 Number of failures 18
1 1
λ= = =0.0099344failure/hour
MTBF 100.659hr /failure
MTBF 170.02654
Availability, A= = =0.9694=96.94%
MTBF+ MDT 170.02654+5.371
MDT 5.371
Unavailability, U= = =0.031=3.1%
MDT + MTBF 5.371+170.02654
MTBF 100.6596
Availability, A= = =0.9342=93.42%
MTBF+ MDT 100.6596+7.08363
MDT 7.08363
Unavailability, U= = =0.0657=6.57%
MDT + MTBF 7.08363+ 100.6596
2.4. Accidental budget analysis
BR=benefit ratio
8320
LR1= =40
208
2919
LR2= =14.034
208
8320
LR3= =5.654
208
792
LR28= =3.808
208
C em1=40(1+0.875)2496=187,200birr/year
C em2=14.034(1+0.875)2496=65679.12birr/year
C em3=5.654(1+0.875)2496=26460.72birr/year
. .
. .
C em28=3.808(1+0.875)2496=17820birr/year
28
= ∑ C em ∗N i = (187200*1) + (65679.12*1) + (26460.72*1) + ………+ (17820*1)
i
i=1
=2,182,253.58birr/year
Therefore, at the very beginning, the organization must allocate 2,182,253.58 birr of accidental budget
per year in order to avoid financial problems pertaining to maintenance department employee salary
at the end or at the third quarter of the year.
S. Machine name Initial machine Book value Year of spare Costs for spare
N cost(birr) purchased parts(in birr)
2008 69,005.54
2007 147,544.35
2006 200,492.00
1 pantograph 1,003,805.92 126,308.01 2005 79,834.18
2004 308,565.19
2003 88,653.52
2000 197,601.51
2010 183,508.03
2009 196,157.49
2 Oxygen plant 1,086,377.93 239,192.25 2007 303,453.05
2004 31,019.43
2001 470,110.08
Therefore, at the very beginning, the organization must allocate 155,956.612 Birr& 236,849.616 Birr of
accidental budget for pantograph machine and oxygen plant respectively in order to avoid financial problems
pertaining to spare part purchase at the end or at the third quarter of the year.
CHAPTER FOUR
Even if, the organization has been applying preventive and breakdown maintenance, it is not to say fully
effective. As a result, continues machine failure happened; Coincidence of machine breakdown with periodic
maintenance time plan and, lack of some reliability analysis of machines. Therefore, as part of the general
outcomes of the project is designed through:-
Reliability analysis of machines by using MTBF, MDT, failure rate (λ), and repair rate (µ)
were conducted.
Probability of machine availability (A) and unavailability (U). And,
Accidental budget plan analysis for labor cost & spare cost estimation was prepared.
4.2. Recommendation
1. John P .Bentley, Introduction to reliability and quality engineering; 2nd edition, Addison Wesley long
man limited. England, 1999.
2. B.S Dhillon, Engineering maintainability; eastern economy edition, New Delhi, Prentile - hall of India plc ,
2004.
3. Maintenance engineering and management handout.
4. Mesfin industrial engineering plc , maintenance manual and document.