MICROSTRIP DIPOLE ANTENNA

FOR WLAN APPLICATION

M.H. Jamaluddin, M.K. A. Rahim M. Z. A. Abd. Aziz, A. Asrokin

Wireless Communication Center (WCC),

Faculty of Electrical Engineering,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
Email: [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract— This paper describes numerical simulation, gap. Microstrip dipole or printed dipole antenna has been
fabrication and experimental measurement of microstrip dipole applied in communication devices such as notebook computer
antenna at 2.4 GHz for WLAN application. In this antenna and access point for WLAN operations [ 8-9].This Type of
design, Agilent’s ADS software using momentum simulation is
employed to analyze the entire structure. The properties of
microstrip dipole antenna usually has a narrow width and in
antenna such as bandwidth, radiation pattern and half power this case it can be integrated at the access point of WLAN
beamwidth have been investigated and compared between application
simulation and measurements. The cross-polar isolation of the
microstrip dipole antenna is in the range of 3 to 17.32 dB. The II.MICROSTRIP DIPOLE ANTENNA DESIGN
typical half power beamwidth (HPBW) of the microstrip dipole is
60º for E plane and 75º for H plane. Performance comparison The approach proposed in this paper is to design microstrip
between dipole and monopole antenna is also made in term of dipole resonance at 2.4 GHz frequency band. Figure 1 shows
bandwidth and Input return loss. the structure of a microstrip dipole of length L, width W and
gap G that were used in simulation. The proposed antenna
Keywords- Microstrip antenna;microstrip dipole; WLAN element is printed on a FR4 substrate with a dielectric constant
of 4.7, a thickness of 1.6 mm and a conductor loss of 0.019.
The two hatched rectangular pieces in Figure 1 are copper on
I.INTRODUCTION the top of the substrate. Each of it is connected with the
Wireless communication has developed widely and rapidly microstrip bend. The gap between the two pieces is G and the
in modern world. Wireless local area networks (WLAN) are microstrip dipole is fed at the middle of the gap. One piece of
emerging technologies that will have dramatically effect in the the hatched is fed with connector and another one is connected
near future. WLAN takes advantage of a license free to the ground.
frequency bands, Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM)
which specify the operating frequencies as 2.4 and 5.2GHz [1-
2].
Microstrip antennas are frequently used in today's wireless
communication systems because of their low profile, light
weight and low production cost which widely have been
researched and developed in the recent twenty years [3-6].
Nevertheless, there are several disadvantages of microstrip
antennas. Narrow operation bandwidth is the main
disadvantage. The bandwidth of the basic patch antenna is
Figure 1: Microstrip Dipole Layout
usually 1 – 3%. The bandwidth of the antenna depends on the
patch shape, dielectric constant, the thickness of the substrate Microstrip dipole of rectangular hatched or rectangular
and the resonant frequency [7]. The design of microstrip geometry as shown in figure 1 can be designed for the lowest
antennas suitable for new WLAN to achieve dual-frequency resonant frequency using transmission line model. The
or multi-band is developed in recent years. formula to calculate the value of λ, L2 and W can be found
Microstrip dipole is a narrow microstrip conductor on the through formulation as follows [10]:
true side of the substrate, which is interrupted by a feeding

30
 The effective dielectric constant (εeff) constant of a • Connect the rectangular hatched with microstrip bend and
microstrip line: chooses the suitable gap G between the two hatched
pieces on the substrate.
• The gap between the two traces is G and the microstrip
dipole is fed at the middle of the gap.
(1)
Where
εr = Dieletric Constant III.RESULT AND DISCUSSION
d = substrate thickness
W= width of microstrip line (Approximation The result of microstrip dipole antenna has been discussed
is made for the simulation) in term of bandwidth response, radiation pattern characteristic
The length (L1 and L2) of microstrip line using formula: and cross polar isolation relative to monopole antenna. Also,
the return loss for both simulation and measurement of
c
λ= (2) microstrip dipole is discussed
f ε eff
A. Input Return Loss
The measurement and simulation result of input return loss
Where λ= wavelength
for the microstrip dipole antenna is shown in figure 3. The
C= velocity of light
bandwidth from the measurement result is 22.99 % and the
f = frequency
bandwidth using simulation result is 19.03%. The
experimental result show the frequency has been shifted up
Thus L1= L2 = λ/4
slightly and the bandwidth is much greater than the simulation
result. The resonance of the antenna can be seen by observing
The length of each hatched rectangular is about quarter-
the dip in the return loss. The simulation results give a good
wavelength. In this case the length of rectangular hatched,
approximation for the measurement even though the
L1=L2= λ/4=17 mm and the gap between the two pieces, G =
bandwidth is much lower than the simulation results.
0.9mm. At the designed frequency, approximation of the
width W is made and it is equal to 2.90 mm. Overall, the Dipole Antenna ( simulation and measurement)

length of the dipole is about, L = 40mm. In addition the Freq (GHz)

microstrip bend is added between the two rectangular hatched 0
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4
which has length and width is equal to 2.9 mm. The
-5
photograph of the fabricated microstrip dipole prototype can
Magnitude(dB)

be shown in figure 2. -10

-15 Measured
Momentum
-20

-25

Figure 3: Input Return Loss for Microstrip Dipole Antenna.

Figure 4 shows the measurement result of input return loss

for monopole and dipole antenna. The bandwidth of
monopole antenna from measurement result is 8.31%. It
shows that the microstrip dipole offer higher bandwidth
compare to the monopole antenna.

Figure 2: Fabricated Microstrip Dipole.

The design procedure of microstrip dipole antenna design

can be carried out in a few steps as follows;
• The resonance frequency is chosen and for this case
resonance frequency at 2.4GHz is chosen.
• Calculate the correct dipole dimension (L1, L2 and W) by
using microstrip transmission line formula.

31
 Return Loss

0
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4
-5
Magnitude (dB)

-10

-15

-20
monopole
-25 microstrip dipole

-30
freq (GHz)

Figure 4: Input Return Loss for dipole and monopole antenna. (c) H Plane monopole antenna

B Radiation Pattern
Figure 5(a) and 5b) shows the radiation pattern of the
microstrip dipole antenna for H Plane and E Plane at 2.4 GHz.
The radiation pattern is in the broadside direction. The cross
polar isolation for E Plane is 17.32 dB and for H Plane is
15.62 dB. The HPBW for E Plane is 60° and H Plane is 75°.
Figure 5(c) and 5(d) show the radiation pattern of the
monopole antenna for H Plane and E Plane. The cross polar
isolation for monopole antenna in E Plane is 6.13 dB and for
H Plane is 13.21 dB. The HPBW of the monopole antenna for
E Plane is 15° and H Plane is 21°.
(d) E Plane monopole antenna
Figure 5: Radiation Pattern for microstrip dipole and monopole antenna.
R adiatio n pattern fo r H -plane

0 co-polar
CONCLUSIONS
Magnitude (dB)

cross-polar
-20
A low cost microstrip dipole antenna for WLAN operations
-40 in the 2.4GHz band has been proposed. The proposed antenna
-60 has a narrow width, and is easy to implement. By having its
-80 dipole near one half wavelengths, the antenna radiates
-20 -15 -10 -50 0 50 100 150 200 bidirectional in the E-plane. The dipole was prototyped and
0 0 0 tested. Measurement and simulation result was compared. The
bandwidth for microstrip dipole is 14.68% greater than
Angle s (De gre e )
monopole antenna. The cross-polar isolation of the microstrip
(a) E Plane microstrip dipole antenna dipole antenna is in the range of 3 to 17.32 dB. The maximum
cross-polar isolation can be seen at H Plane. The HPBW for
Radiation pattern for E-plane microstrip dipole is 60º for E plane and 75º for H plane
Co-polar
0
Magnitude (dB)

Cross-polar
-20
-40
-60
-80
-20 -15 -10 -50 0 50 100 150 200
0 0 0

Angles (Degree)

(b) H Plane microstrip dipole antenna

REFERENCES

32
[1] Zhijun Zhang, M.F. Iskander, J.C. Langer, J. Mathews, “Wideband [6] K. B. Heish and M. H. Chen, “Single feed dual band circularly
dipole antenna for WLAN” , IEEE Antennas and Propagation polarized microstrip antenna” ,Electronic Letters 34, 1998, page:
Society Symposium 2004, Volume 2, 20-25 June 2004, 1170 – 1171.
page(s):1963 – 1966. [7] Garg, R., P. Bhartia, I. Bahl and A. Itlipiboon. 2001. Microstrip
[2] Y. H. Suh and K. Chang, “Low cost microstrip-fed dual frequency Antenna Design Handbook. Artech House Inc., Norwood, USA.
printed dipole antenna for wireless communications,” Electron. [8] Chih-Ming Su, Hong-Twu Chen and Kin-Lu Wong, “Printed dual-
Lett., vol. 36, pp, 1177-1 179, July 6,2000. band dipole antenna with U-slotted arms for 2.4/5.2 GHz WLAN
[3] Qihong Zhong, Yuanxin Li, Hongyan Jiang, Yunliang Long, operation” Electron. Lett., vol. 38, pp, 1308-1309, May 31,2002
“Design of a novel dual-frequency microstrip patch antenna for [9] Huey-Ru Chuang,Liang Chen Kuo,Chi-Chang Lin and Wen-Tzu
WLAN applications” , IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Chen, “A 2.4 GHz Polarization-Diversity Planar Printed Dipole-
Symposium 2004, Volume 1, 20-25 June 2004, page(s):277 – 280. Antenna for WLAN and Wireless Communication
[4] S. Maci and G. Biffi Gentili, “Dual frequency patch antenna” , Applications,”Microwave Journal,vol.45,no.6,pp.50-62,June 2002
IEEE Antenna and Propagation Magazine, 1997, Vol. 39, No. 6, (SCI,EI)
page: 13 – 19. [10] David M.Pozar, “Microwave Engineering”,John Wiley & Sons,
[5] J. Y. Jan and K. L. Wong, “Single feed dual frequency circular Inc,1998
microstrip antenna with an open ring slot” , Microwave Optic
Technology Letter, 1999, 22, page: 157 – 160.

33