Running Head: Lidl Company Analysis 1
Running Head: Lidl Company Analysis 1
Running Head: Lidl Company Analysis 1
Lidl Company
Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
Date
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 2
Table of Contents
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................3
The rationale for the selection of the chosen market using PESTEL analysis..................................3
The competitive intensity of the industrial environment of Lidl in Norway using five forces model
.........................................................................................................................................................6
The threat of new entrants..........................................................................................................6
Bargaining power of suppliers......................................................................................................7
Bargaining power of buyers.........................................................................................................8
Threats of substitutes...................................................................................................................8
Rivalry existing among competing firms......................................................................................8
The firm’s internal environment using VRIO framework.................................................................9
Valuable:.....................................................................................................................................10
Rare:...........................................................................................................................................11
Costly to imitate:........................................................................................................................11
Organized to capture value:.......................................................................................................12
The modes of entry available to Lidl and recommend the best mode..........................................13
Non-controlling interest.............................................................................................................13
Establishing international stores as a part of the foreign expansion.........................................13
Takeover or merger....................................................................................................................14
Joint venture..............................................................................................................................14
Franchise model.........................................................................................................................15
References.....................................................................................................................................16
Appendix........................................................................................................................................17
Comparative PESTLE analysis of Mexico against Norway..........................................................17
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 3
Introduction
Lidl company is an international discount supermarket based in Germany. The
supermarket operates in more than one thousand stores across the U S and Europe. The company
operates within retailing industry. The firm is a chief competitor in the industry that does not
have very many companies. The company operates internationally and will extend its operations
to Norway and Mexico in the future. Macro-environmental factors in a market are key in
determining the success and growth of a business in a particular country. Also, the internal
business factors come into play in contributing to the success of the particular company. The
report seeks to evaluate both the potential markets and conclude which would be more favorable
business operations. Political stability in the country can only affect Lidl’s operations positively.
Though there are some regulations made on how to conduct businesses, the country is not known
for abuse of power by those in authority. Thus, as long as Lidl observes the regulation in place,
the political forces will not prevent the business operations. Also, due to the country’s political
and economic stability, it has a record of security as it is a monarchy without opposition pressure.
As a result, it is almost impossible for a business operating in the country to have its property
and resources destroyed during episodes of violence. There is political satisfaction among the
citizens of Norway. Due to stability, there are many opportunities for social, financial, and
individual growth in the country. Political stability in the country contributes to the record of low
for Lidl. This is because the purchasing power and buying patterns of individuals are greatly
influenced by the economic stability of a country (Liang, 2012). As the majority of the citizens
have a good income and high living standards, they have fewer problems in acquiring items from
the supermarket. The poverty level in the country is reported to be very low. Also, the
unemployment rate is at 2.4% indicating that most of the citizens have positive purchasing power
and buying patterns. On the other hand, the increase in global consumption of goods and services
Consumers in many parts of the world, Norway included having a rising tendency to
spend more on what they want more than what they need (Liang, 2012). Thus, there are a good
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 5
number of impulse buyers in the nation that in turn favors Lidl expansion to the country. Norway
has a long history of political and economic stability as well as a healthy stock exchange and
fiscal responsibility. As such, many investors would want to invest in the country with such
favorable characteristics. The natural resources including oil and fish stocks play a significant
role in boosting the nation’s economic status. The government also plays a role in enhancing
economic growth by curbing unemployment. Norway is listed among the most competitive
economies in the world. with such favorable economic factors, the country will support Lidl
growth as a business.
This is because the company will be able to use technology in conducting their operations
(Srdjevic, Bajcetic & Srdjevic, 2012). the firm will be able to boost the efficiency and
effectiveness of its operations by employing technology. Also, the cost of business practices will
be low as technology can replace employees’ labor. In addition, activities such as marketing,
distributing, and selling products will be made easier (Hartline, Mirrokni and Sundararajan,
2009). The company can be able to reach customers within a short period of time. On the other
hand, the customers will be able to access information regarding the firm and the products they
offer with ease. Most importantly, the high use of technology is associated with the thriving
business operations.
Legal factors in the country contain rules and regulations regarding business operations.
the factors are seen to be favorable for businesses as they are generally favorable. The workers in
the legal system are competent and uphold fairness in dealing with people; whether they are
locals or foreigners. Also, the legal system protects people from possible abuse of power. This
implies that no one is treated favorably when it comes to rules and regulations.
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 6
The poverty level is low in Norway whereby it is as that level from high literacy levels,
political and economic stability, and business development. As a result, citizens are likely to
engage in healthy social activities rather than activities such as thefts. As the unemployment rate
is low, most people are able to sustain themselves in a good life where they earn and spend to
improve their livelihood. On the other hand, individuals are likely to influence each other
positively in purchasing patterns and consumer behavior. As Lidl expands its investment in the
country, chances are the company will thrive from the favorable social behavior that is conducive
The market environment in Norway favors the survival of a business. Proper incentives
are in place to support the growth and expansion of a business. The incentives set up by the
What’s more, the country contains natural resources that could be used as raw materials in
processing products. Also, the environment of the country is perfectly maintained whereby it has
not been destroyed through ways such as pollution. With a favorable environment, it is likely that
is because it is difficult to attain the economies of scale in the industry. As a result, it is costly for
new entrants to perform their production processes. Lidl as well as other companies in the
industry sell highly differentiated products rather than employing standardization. As a result, the
customers in the target market would most likely look for differentiated products as they make
purchases. For the reasons, the threat of new entrants is a weaker force (Mathooko & Ogutu,
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 7
2015). As Lidl operates in Norway, it is likely to have few new entrants in the retail industry. On
the other hand, the new entrants would require high capital to invest in the industry. Thus, it is
The aforementioned factors are likely to contribute positively towards the Lidl’s
operations in Norway as it is easy for the company to dominate in the market. the new entrants
can easily access distribution networks thus they can easily set up the distribution channels when
coming to the business. The factor strengthens the threat of new entrants’ force. The retailing
industry has strict policies and regulations in conducting business. this would make it difficult
makes them have little control over prices of goods and services. The factor favors the firm’s
operation in Norway as it will not be easily overcharged by the suppliers for the goods or
services. Also, this implies that their cost of production will be low and the company will be able
to optimize its profits. In addition, the products offered by the suppliers are standardized rather
than differentiated. The bargaining power of suppliers is made weak by the fact that Lidl can
switch between suppliers who meet their requirements. What’s more, there are no substitutes for
products rather than the ones offered by the suppliers in the industry (Mathooko & Ogutu, 2015).
As it operates in Norway, other companies within the industry would take advantage of the weak
bargaining power of suppliers. Also, the competitors can be able to easily offer the products
offered by Lidl as the supplies are easily accessible and highly affordable.
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 8
than the number of firms in the industry. As a result, the companies have much control over the
prices of goods and services as the buyers do not have much of a choice. In Norway, the
company would control its profitability to a big extent whereby it can use innovation to attract
customers as it controls the pricing of its products. Consequently, the bargaining power of the
buyers is a weak force. Also, as product differentiation is high in the industry, it becomes
difficult for buyers to find alternative sellers of a particular product within the industry. The
customers at Norway would be less price sensitive as the economic status of the country is high
and the poverty levels are low. On the other hand, the income level of the majority of
Norwegians is relatively high. As a result, Lidl can control the prices to its favor in the country
Threats of substitutes
The retailing industry which Lidl operates in contain few substitutes for the products
offered. The threat of substitutes is thus a weaker force in the industry. If the company employs
competitive incentives in Norway, it is possible to dominate the market by offering a product that
satisfies its customers. the few substitutes available are very expensive and of high quality. Most
of the buyers would not prefer to pay higher prices for the products that they already pay. As
such, Lidl still remains to be advantageous while operating in Norway. Studies indicate that the
buyers within the industry are less likely to switch between substitutes considering the fact that
is noted that their rivalry is not high considering each of the companies is able to capture its
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 9
customers quite well. Also, as most of the firms are big, they employ incentives to attract
customers each in their own way. What’s more, the high differentiation of products plays a role
in giving each firm uniqueness of some kind such that the customers are less likely to look for
substitutes (Liang, 2012). The firm can thrive well in Norway considering the weak force of
rivalry among the existing firms. Each of the firms operating within the industry in Norway
company to gain a competitive advantage in the market. the framework suggests that a company
should be valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and perfectly non-suitable. Thus, capabilities and
resources are very crucial in a firm so as to attain successful results. They facilitate the
Valuable:
Strategies and resources are essential in helping a firm to conduct its operations. This
includes exploiting the opportunities available. According to the success the company has had, it
is clear that it employs the necessary resources to effectively execute its operations (Castellani,
2012). Also, the firm has a history of seizing the available opportunities for the good of the
business. The resources and the capabilities of the firm also enable it to defend itself from the
threats it faces from time to time. Lidl focuses on having strategic resources that yield benefits to
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 11
it. The resources are majorly the intangible resources that are characterized by inimitability. The
intangible resources include the skills and knowledge of the employees. The expertise of workers
cannot be imitated by other firms. The company invests in improving the quality of its human
resources through training and seminars among others. With high expertise in conducting
business, Lidl is able to attain efficiency in all its operations ranging from production to
marketing practices.
The value of the firm’s resources enables it to satisfy its customers as well as increasing
their value. To attain this, the operations conducted are customer-centered as well as the firm’s
decisions. They are all aimed towards satisfying the consumers. Differentiation of the products
enables the company to create the value of its resources. Also, the decrease in products’ prices
increases the value. The firm is known for selling its products at low prices as well as using
discount sales. Consequently, the firm is able to acquire a competitive advantage without much
straining.
Rare:
Rare resources are those that are not common among the other firms. The resources give
a company uniqueness in its operations such that it cannot be imitated by the competitors. Rare
resources give Lidl a competitive advantage over rival companies. The firm is able to use the
resources to produce unique products that are highly differentiated (Castellani, 2012). The
competing firms find it difficult to produce the exact same products as they do not have access to
Costly to imitate:
The aspect means that the resources and capabilities used by a company are costly to be
imitated by other firms in the industry. As a result, other companies do not imitate the resources.
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 12
Imitation can be done through duplication or substitution. As Lidl has got valuable and rare
resources, they are hard to imitate as it will be costly. Also, having resources that are difficult to
imitate implies that the company has attained a great competitive advantage over the rival
companies. The firm’s resources are costly to imitate as they contain three major characteristics;
company. As such, Lidl uses effective strategies to utilize the available resources in its business
operations. This way, they are able to attain a competitive advantage in the market. the company
employs its resources by considering the external environment. Market research is done
extensively to gather information regarding the situation in the market; the product’s demand and
the new products available. Thus, the management systems of Lidl are organized as well as
policies, processes, and strategies in order to optimize the use of the resources available.
Lidl has focused on its resources and capabilities because they are the major contributors
to the success of the company (Castellani, 2012). The firm continually improves its resources so
that they can yield the best results upon implementation. Consequently, the management team
ensures that only strategic resources are acquired. Strategic resources are beneficial to a company
as they contain favorable characteristics including value, rare to find, and inimitability. Through
the use of strategic resources, the competitors are not able to outperform the company. The use of
the resources is also done in a strategic and organized manner so that they can be effective.
What’s more, the external factors are considered when utilizing resources in the company.
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 13
include non-controlling interest, setting international stores, merger strategy, franchise model,
Non-controlling interest
The mode of entry is majorly employed by companies at their initial expansion stages.
Most of these companies lack sufficient intelligence from foreign markets. Also, they lack
expertise in establishing international operations. thus, a particular firm might make a choice to
invest in already-existing companies in a foreign country. In the case, the firm acquires the
minority stake in the business whereby it lacks control over the operations and management of
the business. The mode of entry might be expensive in the long last considering that the firm will
acquire a minority stake and fail to control the operations. In other words, it will have no control
establishing stores in the foreign market. the establishment is done according to the attractiveness
of the expanding market (Allen & Carlson, 2018). the approach is majorly used by the fashion
companies and designer brands. After the establishment, the stores are operated in a foreign
country by the mother company in the home country. By opening a showroom, a particular firm
is able to promote its brand in a foreign country whereby the customers are able to view the
variety of products offered. Such a firm use foreign stores as an expansion of their company in a
foreign country. Employees are trained and resources employed to properly manage international
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 14
operations. Good returns are acquired from the kind of operations upon proper management.
However, the firm will not have entered in the market fully.
Takeover or merger
In this mode of entry, a company buys a local firm in a foreign market and operates it
under its management (Pan & David, 2012). Through merger or takeover, a firm is able to gain
instant access to the sales network and markets. Also, it is able to take over the market shares of
the firm upon proper management. The business transfers all the processes including the
management and all the involved operational processes over a short period of time. Adoption of
the model of market entry requires a firm to have all the knowledge regarding the market of
interest so that it can effectively operate to satisfy its customers and outperform the existing
competitors. On the other hand, it is necessary that a particular firm has adequate knowledge of
the strategic options of the kind of business. some companies opt to buy out the existing network,
infrastructure, and the established resources and convert the existing brand and thus they are able
Joint venture
A joint venture entails a trade agreement made between the international firm and
suitable business partners in a foreign country. A joint venture works in favor of both parties.
through a joint venture, the foreign company gains access to the market share of the local
company as well as its reputation. On the other hand, the domestic firm has the ability to expand
the product portfolio through its involvement with the foreign company. The reputable the brand
name of the international firm the better for the local firm as the business will have a large
market share. The nature of different joint ventures differs from one agreement to the other. The
success of the business operations will depend on the effectiveness of the relationship between
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 15
the two companies. Both the firms should work towards common objectives for the success of
Franchise model
The mode of entry, the international company engages a domestic business in a foreign
country based on the franchise agreement (Pan & David, 2012). The operations of such a
business are conducted as per the mother company. Also, the brand, products’ ideas, marketing
formats, sales, and brand promotion are conducted according to the parent firm. engagement of
the right partner in a franchise yields great success for the business. Such a partner is one with a
great reputation and a large market share. Also, the partner should share the same objectives and
visions as the parent company. What’s more, they should be willing to invest in the business so
Franchise model would work best as a mode of entry for Lidl. This is because unlike the
other modes of entry, the company will have control over the operations of the business.
According to the model, all the practices, and management processes are conducted as per the
parent company. As such, Lidl will have the majority influence over the business. Likewise, the
firm will gain more profits according to their bigger stake in the business. The business will even
succeed more if Lidl partners with a reputable firm in Norway as it will already be having a large
market share.
LIDL COMPANY ANALYSIS 16
References
Allen, N., & Carlson, M. J. (2018). Focus: Why McDonald’s Tax practices matter to the global
Castellani, P. (2012). Corporate University and company’s competitiveness: the case of Lidl
Hartline, J., Mirrokni, V. and Sundararajan, M., (2009). Optimal marketing strategies over social
networks. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp.
189-198). ACM.
Liang, Y. P. (2012). The relationship between consumer product involvement, product knowledge
and impulsive buying behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 325-330.
Mathooko, F. M., & Ogutu, M. (2015). Porter’s five competitive forces framework and other
factors that influence the choice of response strategies adopted by public universities in
Pan, Y., & David, K. T. (2012). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of
Srdjevic, Z., Bajcetic, R., & Srdjevic, B. (2012). Identifying the criteria set for multicriteria
Appendix
Comparative PESTLE analysis of Mexico against Norway
Mexico Norway
Political factors: Political factors:
-Local governments affect businesses by -The country has political stability whereby
businesses. -However, the trading business for the growth of the nation.
-44% of Mexicans are poor thus there is a -Norway has a stable economy that affects the
-The percentage rate of economic growth -The unemployment rate in the country is
makes the Mexican government 2.4% which is among the lowest in the
Americas.
Social factors: Social factors:
-The country has favorable sociocultural -The social factors in Norway are favorable
factors for a business including a rise for the growth of a business as the
However, as the poverty level is high, purchases. This is because the number
marketing processes.
Legal factors: Legal factors:
-Mexican Laws determine how and if an -The legal system of Norway contains
operations.
Environmental factors: Environmental factors:
-Mexico has got environmental problems due -Norway contains many natural resources
growth. Most natural resources have -Some of the natural resources are ready to be
communication systems.