Child Language Acquisition
Child Language Acquisition
Child Language Acquisition
1. Why does R L Trask say that "the acquisition of language is arguably the most
astonishing and wonderful feat we accomplish in our entire life"?
The acquisition of language is arguably the most astonishing and wonderful
feat we accomplish in our entire life, and we do it at an age when we can hardly do
anything else. Moreover, it is the one thing that children do better than adults: any
physically normal child will learn perfectly the language surrounding it, whereas
hardly any adults can perform the same feat.
4. What is cooing?
Cooing is also known as gurgling or mewing. At around the age of two
months, the infant begins cooing making those familiar but hard-to-describe baby
noises like ‘Coo’, ‘ga-ga’ and ‘goo’. Around six months, cooing gives way to
babbling, a kind of vocal play typically involving strings of syllables. Child
develops increasing control over vocal chords.
5. What is babbling?
Around six months, cooing gives way to babbling, a kind of vocal play
typically involving strings of syllables. Sounds begin to resemble adult sounds
more closely. These sounds have no meaning and baby makes far more noise than
before.
10. What does the results obtained from the 'wug test' indicate?
The Wug Test was an experiment carried out by Jean Berko in 1958 which
aimed to investigate the acquisition of the plural and other inflectional morphemes
in English-speaking children. test showed that children have productive rules: they
don’t learn by hearing every possible form but by applying linguistic rules that
they subconsciously know. Using the wug test a child is shown a cute little figure
and told ‘Here’s a wug.’ A second, similar, figure is introduced, and the
investigator says ‘Look -here’s another wug. Now there are two-’ A child who says
wugs, with the ending correctly pronounced like a z, has learned to make plurals.
Most four-year-olds get this right, and practically everyone gets it right by age six.
Now the child has never heard the made-up word wug before, and therefore can
never have heard the plural wugs. The results proved that the subject did acquire
naturally the studied morphemes and the Wug test shows some aspects of the
interlanguage development related to the acquisition of morphemes done by the
subject of the study.
11. What is significant about the way children learn to make negative statements?
First, they just stick a negative word (usually no) at the front of the sentence:
No I want juice. After a while, that negative word is moved to the front of the verb:
I no want juice. Finally, the rather complicated English negative auxiliaries appear:
I don’t want juice. but she will continue to use her current pattern for making
negatives until she’s ready for the next stage. And negatives are in no way
exceptional. Precisely the same thing happens with every aspect of language
acquisition.
15. What evidence of innateness can be found by observing deaf children and
children born to deaf parents?
Deaf children of deaf parents acquire sign language in the same way that
hearing children of hearing parents acquire a spoken language. Deaf children coo
and babble like other children, but, their babbling soon dries up and they remain
silent. However, if they observe people around them using sign language, they
eagerly begin babbling with their hands. If their parents are deaf and hence fluent
signers, such children go on to learn sign language normally and perfectly, and
they go through all the same stages as speaking children. These children develop
gestures as the first stage of language development.
16. Why does Ray Jackendoff say that children 'look for language'?
The linguist Ray Jackendoff says that children look for language because
they look first for spoken language; failing that, they look for sign language;
failing that, they look for anything in the environment which might resemble
language, and do their best to turn it into a fully developed language.
17. How does the formation of creoles from pidgins support the innateness
hypothesis?
A pidgin is a contact language that developed in a situation where speakers
of different languages need a language to communicate. A pidgin becomes a creole
when it is adopted as the native language of a speech community. A pidgin has no
fixed vocabulary and no fixed grammar at all. The children take the pidgin and turn
it into a real language. They settle on a fixed grammatical system, including, for
example, a fixed word order, which pidgins don’t have. They introduce all sorts of
new grammatical elaborations which are absent from the pidgin: verb tenses,
subordinate clauses, everything you’d expect a language to have. This new
language is called a creole, and the children who create it are the first native
speakers of the creole.
20. What is Williams Syndrome and how does it support the modularity of
language hypothesis?
Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder. It was discovered some years
ago that a particular defect on chromosome number eleven induces a disorder of
calcium metabolism in our bodies, with highly consistent consequences. Williams
children are small and slight, with several abnormalities of the internal organs and
a striking ‘pixie-like’ face. What the Williams syndrome shows is that even fairly
devastating damage to mental and cognitive processes may leave the language
faculty virtually intact. Certain children who otherwise appear to be normal,
healthy and intelligent none the less have great difficulty in learning a first
language. Often they start very late, progress slowly, speak slowly and painfully,
have trouble completing their sentences, and make lots of mistakes. Some of them,
though, speak rapidly and fluently, but with an absolutely horrendous number of
grammatical mistakes. Most affected children eventually acquire a more or less
adequate command of language, but the disability none the less continues
throughout life.