The Effectiveness of Leaflets and Posters As A Health Education Method
The Effectiveness of Leaflets and Posters As A Health Education Method
The Effectiveness of Leaflets and Posters As A Health Education Method
DOI: 10.5455/msm.2020.32.135-139
Received: MAR 19 2020; Accepted: MAY 20, 2020
© 2020 Nino Hasanica, Aida Ramic-Catak, Adnan Mujezinovic, Sead Begagic, Kenan Galijasevic, Mirza Oruc
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Number
Change (%) of students and attitudes565
of knowledge 485 1064
Poster 1058 1399 Leaflet Control group
Table 3. Change of knowledge and attitudes of students between surveys at different time points
5. DISCUSSION
The HBSC study in Moldova from 2014 presents the
results of 6642 respondents in age of 11, 13 and 15 (6). In
Figure1.1.Change
Figure Changeofof knowledge
knowledge andand attitudes
attitudes of students
of students betweenbetween
surveys at different time15-year-old
points
surveys at different time points Europe, girls consider themselves overweight
(7, 8). Only 23% of adolescents in Europe carry out mini-
1-2 times a week, and this is claimed by only 3 (5.3%) girls. mum physical activity of 60 minutes per day, and 4.6% do
In total 81 (67.5%) students (more often boys) believe that not have physical activity on a daily basis (7, 9). In Europe,
friends on social networks are their real friends, or they are only 60% of the respondents have breakfast every day, and
undecided on this matter. every tenth jumps out the breakfast. A total of 13.1% of girls
Evaluation of the effectiveness of health education do not take breakfast in working days (8, 10). The frequency
methods of electronic media contacts shows a significant increase of
The total number of valid answers in the group of stu- over 15% between 11 and 15 years of age in Europe (more
dents using posters as a method of health education was often among girls and rich families) (8, 11).
17
1853. The calculated Q value was 8.620513, so the value In other surveys, most respondents answered that they
of p was 0.003324 (p<0.05). The method of distribution receive entertainment information via television (72%),
of health-educational posters shows a somewhat lower followed by counseling (14%), and educational informa-
but still present statistical significance in relation to the tion (14%). A total of 74% of respondents prefer to watch
acquired knowledge and a change in attitudes between educational television series, 26% movies. Television could
the conducted surveys at different time points. In the first be considered to be method by which a wide range of audi-
round of the survey students gave 58.07% of the correct ences can be reached, if health-educational content were
answers to questions from the questionnaire. After the incorporated into other television content (12).
poster distribution was carried out, the percentage of cor- The reason for increasing knowledge and positively
rect answers increased to 62.06%, and a month later to changing attitudes in applying posters in this research can
62.76% (Table 2, Table 3, Graph 1). be the simplicity of providing information on the poster.
The total number of valid responses in the group of stu- The poster stays in the long term in the place where it is
dents using the health-education leaflet was 2442. The cal- set up, which allows for a long-term retention of knowledge
culated Q value was 1, so the p value was 0.317311 (p>0.05). and positive attitudes at approximately the same level as
There is no statistically significant change in the level of after the education. In the UK in 2001, research on health
knowledge and attitudes between conducted surveys at behavior of population was conducted, and it was concluded
three different times. In the first round of the survey stu- that it is closely related to the social environment and the
dents gave 56.34% of the correct answers to the questions community (3).
from the questionnaire. After the distribution of leaflets, The reason for the fact that there is no increase in
the percentage of the correct answers increased negligibly knowledge and a change in the attitude after the distribu-
to 56.39%, and a month later the students answered cor- tion of leaflets in this research can be the overload with
rectly to 55.86% of the questions (Table 2, Table 3, Chart 1). the distribution of leaflets of various kinds, from market-
The total number of valid responses in the control group ing to health education. There is even a decrease in the
knowledge of students after the distribution of leaflets. The of the Institute for Health Protection Zaječar has shown
overloading with this type of printed material could be a that physicians are not the best health educators, for the
demotivating factor for learning. The knowledge and atti- simple reason that they are preoccupied with the phenom-
tudes are changed in an extremely small and insignificant enon of disease (19). In 2000, the research was carried out
number of questions, between the first and second survey, in the state of Illinois, USA. As many as 81% of respondents
and between the second and third survey. In most issues, consider it is necessary to introduce health education into
knowledge remained the same, and there were also a large schools as a separate teaching subject, and 83% think that
number of students who did not have prior knowledge but the school should have a nurse in their team (20).
did not even learn. Health education work does not provide Health education is often an unheard and unjustifiably
significant results regarding the acquired knowledge of stu- neglected health care measure, both by the population and
dents by the method of distribution of health-educational by health professionals of all profiles and levels of educa-
leaflets. According to this study, there is no evidence that tion. Health education has unlimited possibilities and an
the leaflets distribution method should be used when it unmatched number of different methods and a combination
comes to promotion of health and healthy lifestyles among of methods for work (21).
healthy children, which are not even interested in such According to this research, the distribution of health-
knowledge by their nature. However, it can be used in situ- educational posters is recommended in situations where it
ations where it is necessary to reach a wide audience, the is necessary to reach a wide audience for a long period of
information being presented is not particularly important, time, if the site of the poster is protected, although this is
or it is sufficient to be in the form of a notice (as a notice for not a guarantee that the increase in knowledge will be high.
a lecture, a workshop, a brief information about the results The distribution of health-educational leaflets does not
achieved in some work etc.). Different from healthy chil- give significant results regarding the acquired knowledge
dren, the method of distributing health-education leaflets of students. According to this study, there is no evidence
may have potential in work with newly discovered cases of that the leaflet distribution method should be used when
chronic mass non-communicable diseases when individuals it comes to the promotion of health and healthy lifestyles
are most motivated to learn about their illness (13). In the among healthy children, which, by their nature, are not
research of Singh and associates, the distribution of leaflets even motivated for this kind of knowing.
with the simultaneous use of practical demonstrations and Alternative health education methods need to be identi-
audio-visual means in health education have much better fied. Experts in nursing and health sciences in the field of
results than the isolated distribution of printed materials, health education have all the possibilities for professional
leaflets (4). In a study carried out by Gupta and associates realization.
among the student population, it was concluded that stu-
dents consider PowerPoint presentations and audio-visual 6. CONCLUSION
means as incomparably more acceptable methods of acquir- Health education of the population in general, and espe-
ing knowledge, opposed to printed materials, leaflets (5). cially for children, through the activity of specific preven-
The reason for increasing the percentage of accurate tive-promotional health care for young people in schools
responses in the control group may be the fact that stu- and faculties, should be given priority in order to influence
dents were interested in this topic after the first survey, but the more positive and healthy lifestyles of the population,
also that they listened some topics in the field of healthy thereby reducing the negative health outcomes and high
lifestyles in other teaching subjects in schools (e.g. “Physi- costs of health care (19).
cal and health education”, “My environment” and similar
teaching subjects). The essence of health education is in • Authors contribution: Each author were included in all steps of prepara-
long-term knowledge retention and changing attitudes. tion this article. Final proof reading was made by the first author.
People who are not health care workers as the most common • Conflict of interest: None declared.
source of health information suggest conversations with • Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
friends (14). Among health workers, a common source of
information is other health professional, but also the media. REFERENCES
Therefore, health workers are more inclined to use health 1. Mašić I, Toromanović S, Smajkić A. Health education of the
knowledge sources that are based on greater expertise, population. In: Mašić I. (ed.). Social medicine with the basics of
while people who are not health care workers more often use community health care and polyvalent patronage. Sarajevo:
informal sources of information (friends) (14). Comparing Avicena, 2008: 277-92.
with the results of previous researches, the most dominant 2. Ibrahimagić-Šeper L. Promotion of health and disease prevention.
source of health information in the wider public is mass In: Ibrahimagić-Šeper L. et al. Promotion of health and disease
media (television, internet, journals), while health profes- prevention. Zenica: University of Zenica, 2008: 75-120.
sionals, friends and family members are equally important 3. Morrow V. Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s
sources of knowledge (15, 16). Also, the results are similar perspectives on their environments: some ideas for com-
to the results from a survey conducted on the nursing fac- munity health initiatives. Health education reasrch. 2001;
ulty, where the main source of information is the healthcare 16: 255-268.
worker, while the knowledge through the thematic public 4. Singh N, Ramakrishnan TS, Khera A, Singh G. Impact evalu-
tribunes on health is least represented (17, 18). ation of two methods of dental health education among
“De-medicalization” of health education in the activities children of a primary school in rural India. Medical Journal
of Dr. D.Y. Patil University. 2016; 9: 66-71. 12. Vukić T, Youens I. Television program as a teaching tool in
5. Gupta R, Ingle NA, Kaur N, Ingle E, Charania Z. Evaluation acquiring elementary school media competencies. Medij
of the impact of different health education methods in un- istraž. 2015; 21: 79-100.
dergraduate students of dental college, Mathura City. Journal 13. Mahmutović N, Bešlagić Z. Written health-promotional
of advanced oral research. 2016; 7. material in family medicine. Book of Abstracts of the Third
6. Lesco G. Behavioral and social determinants of adolescent Session of Public Health Specialists FB&H. Bihać, 2017.
health: Summary report of the health behaviors in school- 14. Drašković V. Globalization in the media mirror. Media dialogues
aged children study in the Republic of Moldova. Chisinau, 2009; 2: 119-127.
2015. 15. Varoščić M. Sources of knowledge in the acquisition of health
7. World Health Organization. A snapshot of the health of young culture. Rijeka: Publishing Center Rijeka, 1991.
people in Europe: A report prepared for the European Com- 16. Barath A. Culture, education and health. Zagreb: High Medi-
mission conference on youth health. Brussels, Belgium, 2009. cal School, Department of Health Psychology, 1995.
8. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, Looze M, Roberts 17. Maričić-Lučić I, Sindik J. Connection of the acquisition of
C, Samdal O, Smith O, Barnekow V. et al. (eds.). Social de- health information with the demographic characteristics of
terminants of health and well-being among young people. nursing students. Medianali, 2014; 2: 11-15.
Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: In- 18. Pavlović V, Sindik J, Lenz G, Nadilo B, Saulan S, Šljuka M.
ternational report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: Sources of information about health in nursing students in
WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2012. Dubrovnik. Nurses Education Magazine. 2014; 11.
9. Corning AF. et al. Preventing the development of body issues 19. Paunović P. Theater, school of health – actors, teachers of
in adolescent girls through intervention with their mothers. health. Timok Medical Gazette, History of medicine 2015; 40: 1.
Body Image 2010; 7: 289-295. 20. Temple M. Opinions of Illinos Voters About Coordinated
10. David-Ferdon C, Hertz MF. Electronic media, violence, and School Health Programs. Journal of School Health. 2004;
adolescents: an emerging public health problem. Journal of 74: 105-107.
Adolescent Health. 2007; 41: 1-5. 21. Hasanica N. Evaluation of health education methods in the
11. Coulton C, Irwin M. Parental and community level correlates formation of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of school
of participation in out-of-school activities among children children towards health. Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of
living in low income neighborhoods. Children and Youth Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, 2017.
Services Review 2009; 31: 300-308.