Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 74 views

    Bilingualism: Causes, Advantages, and Disadvantages: January 2020

    Uploaded by

    Zara Nur
    This document summarizes the causes, advantages, and disadvantages of bilingualism. There are four main causes of bilingualism: choice, geography, migration, and religious reasons. Some advantages of bilingualism include improved cognitive skills, delayed cognitive decline, and more job opportunities. However, bilingualism can also lead to disadvantages like difficulty speaking one of the languages fluently, cultural bias, and religious bias. While individual bilingualism tends to have more advantages, the impacts of social bilingualism are more open to discussion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bilingualism: Causes, Advantages, and Disadvantages: January 2020

    Uploaded by

    Zara Nur
    74 views3 pages
    This document summarizes the causes, advantages, and disadvantages of bilingualism. There are four main causes of bilingualism: choice, geography, migration, and religious reasons. Some advantages of bilingualism include improved cognitive skills, delayed cognitive decline, and more job opportunities. However, bilingualism can also lead to disadvantages like difficulty speaking one of the languages fluently, cultural bias, and religious bias. While individual bilingualism tends to have more advantages, the impacts of social bilingualism are more open to discussion.

    Original Title

    Bilingual is m

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the causes, advantages, and disadvantages of bilingualism. There are four main causes of bilingualism: choice, geography, migration, and religious reasons. Some advantages of bilingualism include improved cognitive skills, delayed cognitive decline, and more job opportunities. However, bilingualism can also lead to disadvantages like difficulty speaking one of the languages fluently, cultural bias, and religious bias. While individual bilingualism tends to have more advantages, the impacts of social bilingualism are more open to discussion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    74 views3 pages

    Bilingualism: Causes, Advantages, and Disadvantages: January 2020

    Uploaded by

    Zara Nur
    This document summarizes the causes, advantages, and disadvantages of bilingualism. There are four main causes of bilingualism: choice, geography, migration, and religious reasons. Some advantages of bilingualism include improved cognitive skills, delayed cognitive decline, and more job opportunities. However, bilingualism can also lead to disadvantages like difficulty speaking one of the languages fluently, cultural bias, and religious bias. While individual bilingualism tends to have more advantages, the impacts of social bilingualism are more open to discussion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

    net/publication/338342415

    Bilingualism: Causes, advantages, and disadvantages

    Article · January 2020

    CITATIONS READS

    0 5,432

    1 author:

    Oussama Aba
    Abou Bakr Belkaid University of Tlemcen
    6 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

    SEE PROFILE

    Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

    bilingualism View project

    English for Tourism View project

    All content following this page was uploaded by Oussama Aba on 02 January 2020.

    The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


    Bilingualism: Causes, advantages, and disadvantages.
    Bilingualism is the state of speaking two or more languages by a speaker or a group of
    speakers, it is a sociolinguistic phenomenon that is resulted from social behaviours which
    affected a person’s way of speaking, in the popular view, being bilingual equals being able to
    speak two languages perfectly; this is also the approach of Bloomfield (1935: 56), who
    defines bilingualism as ‘the native-like control of two languages’. Contrary to this definition
    which includes only ‘perfect bilinguals’ McNamara (1967a) proposes that a bilingual is
    anyone who possesses a minimal competence in only one of the four language skills in a
    language other than his mother tongue.
    Between these two extremes we could find a whole array of definitions as, for example, the
    one proposed by Titone (1972), for whom bilingualism is the individual’s capacity to speak a
    second language while following the concepts, and structures of that language rather than
    paraphrasing his or her mother tongue. As the years passed each scholar concerned with this
    discipline had his own view which are all correct to some extent, for the world once had
    Monolingualism as a norm, but things always change.
    The causes of this linguistic behaviour are many, but they can be divided into four major
    parts; first, the choice. Choosing to become bilingual may have personal outcomes like an
    interest in a language. Because all choices are motivated, the advantage of this choice may
    lead to the development of better cognitive skills, studies has shown that children who are
    bilingual are generally better achievers in school than their monolinguals pairs. Being
    bilingual also delays cognitive damage like Alzheimer and Aphasia. The disadvantage of
    bilingualism however is being receptive bilingual, i.e. understanding two languages but being
    able of speak only one. More to this as advantage is getting more chances when looking for a
    job, but many professions are dominated by one language, which creates some kind of bias, as
    a disadvantage.
    Secondly, Geography. Choice is a relatively uncommon reason for becoming bilingual.
    However, Geography plays a bigger role, it may seem as a forced way of being bilingual to
    some extent. In many areas of the world small regions are home to several groups speaking
    different languages, and being able to function in daily life often means having to learn a
    second or third language. The advantage of this is cultural diversity for each language
    contains a culture, but in some regions this diversity is stigmatized, for instance in the Kabyle
    region in Algeria where difference of language is enough for national problems, heated
    debates, and most commonly disagreements.
    Thirdly, Migration. Obviously, when people move to another country, they will have to learn
    to speak the dominant language of that country if they want to be functional in that society.
    Migration accounts for a very large proportion of bilinguals, in fact, though many of them do
    not become fluent so much as simply capable in their adopted language, and still use their
    native language at home, this may cause cultural bias as a disadvantage. Not always learning a
    second language is welcomed, the minority group here which are bilingual in a monolingual
    speech community are often seen as different (sometimes even as a threat), a consequence of
    prejudice. Like the case of Arabs in France who are not always welcomed there and seen in a
    bad way when using their mother tongue which reveals their origins.
    Fourthly, Religious Reasons. Some religions regard their language to be holy “Language of
    God,” and even when they are practiced in new areas or when the original language has fallen
    into disuse, those seeking to pursue religious studies or practice that religion must still learn
    the holy language, this may result in religious bias as a disadvantage, some religions may
    welcome bilingualism for spreading their religion, other religions may not. They would be
    praising their language and ignoring or discriminating others nations’ languages simply for
    being different.
    To conclude, bilingualism is the norm in the present day, and this fact may change someday,
    but researchers in the field of bilingualism must be open and tolerant to the fact that all
    definitions proposed by scholars concerning bilingualism whether being extreme or not are
    considered to be correct, as this linguistic phenomenon is seen from different perspectives. On
    the other hand, as far as advantages and disadvantages are concerned, one may conclude that
    the negative sides of individual bilingualism are barely taken into account when being
    compared with the huge range of positive effects. However, the case may not be the same for
    social bilingualism as this topic is open to discussion.

    Aba Oussama, Master II LS

    View publication stats

    You might also like