Dutilleux Conversation
Dutilleux Conversation
Dutilleux Conversation
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Musical Times
PROGRESSIVE GROTH
PROGRESSIVE GROWTH
PRoger Nichols talks to Henri Dutilleux about his life and music
different ifin
RN: Do you consider there to be a nationalistic element thisyour
school and its music hadn't left its mark on me.
music? You can find traces of the technique in my music, but of course I've
used it in a quite different way, not at all rigorously. It's not that I
HD: I think it's important that an art, whether it's music or litera- totally reject its principles: what I reject is the dogma and the
ture, should keep its fundamentally national properties, whatever authoritarianism which manifested themselves at that period.
that nationality may be. It's good that artists of a particular country
should also steep themselves in foreign characteristics - Gide spoke You have spoken of the advantages of studying harmony and coun-
of 'fermentation' (he even used the word 'yeast'), the tiny grains of terpoint simultaneously...
foreign leavening which keep a national art alive. On the other
hand, at certain moments in history it's necessary to concentrate on ...yes, because before coming to the Paris Conservatoire I was
purely national qualities. Debussy, for example, went to an taught by an excellent musician, and he liked students to work at
extreme of nationalism during the First World War, at the end ofthese two disciplines almost simultaneously, not absolutely. He
his life. Even in peace time he held an analogous position, but on said that I very soon developed enough of a harmonic sense to be
the strictly aesthetic front - it was a kind of detachment from the able to go on to counterpoint. He taught counterpoint in a very rig-
music of Wagner, which was perfectly understandable because it orous manner (which is how it must be taught, or not at all), so that
was necessary at that particular moment. Wagner's music was when I arrived in Paris I was already well enough prepared to be
invading the music of France, especially through French intermedi- able to join both the harmony class and the fugue class. That
aries who were too much under his influence, particularly in the wasn't what normally happened in French teaching at that time; you
field of opera. But the language had a sort of emphasis which generally did perhaps three years' harmony, then counterpoint on
didn't match the French spirit at all, and I think Debussy was right its own, then fugue on its own. It's all quite different nowadays
to make his stand. and people understand how necessary it is to bring the two tech-
It's also a question of historical context. We might mention the niques together as quickly as possible. I think it's necessary
1950s and 60s and beyond when we were invaded by music that because it's to some extent a reflection on musical history, isn't it?
depended, to a really exaggerated extent, on the serial system. I Traditionally, French composers are more harmonically than con-
think that was dangerous too - people have used the word 'terror- trapuntally orientated: they have a taste for the beautiful chord, and
ism'. What could one do? Only defend oneself, not by words or for many Frenchmen this harmonic richness and refinement have
manifestos, but by writing music. been the primary aim - and I may say I too have followed this path
to a small extent all through my composing life. But I also needed
How did you learn about serial music? to develop my contrapuntal technique as an antidote to it. In fact,
when I was young I was very fond of fugue, which was perhaps
At the time I was completing my studies at the Paris Conservatoire another legacy from my Flanders ancestors.
in 1938, our professors never mentioned it to us. We knew the
name Schoenberg, but not his works. It was only after the war that There was no analysis class at the Conservatoire. Was that a seri-
we got to know his music and that of his pupils. It's strange that ous lack for a composer?
there should have been this eclipse, this lack of interest that went on
for years, from 1925 to 1950. There have always been important Very serious, I feel, because after that you had to discover every-
periods of development in music, and serialism was just such a thing for yourself. I finished my formal studies in 1938 and then,
period. I may say that, even though I'm a very long way from the during the Occupation, I was demobilised and returned to Paris. I
Second Viennese School, I've gained something from serialism all was determined on reading scores I didn't know and even composi-
the same. It's a question I've given a lot of thought to, and I've tion treatises, like d'Indy's. I immersed myself in scores out of a
studied a lot of works written using this technique, and as a result desire to analyse them. At the Conservatoire we had passed abrupt-
I've had to consider my position - perhaps I would have been rather ly from an excellent grounding in harmony, fugue and counterpoint