BS Iso 23865-2021

BS
ISO 23865:2021
BSI Standards Publication
Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing —

General use of full matrix capture/total focusing
technique (FMC/TFM) and related technologies
BS ISO 23865:2021 BRITISH STANDARD
National foreword
This British Standard is the UK implementation of ISO 23865:2021.
The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical
Committee WEE/-/1, Briefing committee for welding.
A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on
request to its committee manager.
This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions
of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application.
© The British Standards Institution 2021
Published by BSI Standards Limited 2021
ISBN 978 0 539 04277 1
ICS 19.100
Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from
legal obligations.
This British Standard was published under the authority of the
Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 January 2021.
Amendments/corrigenda issued since publication

Date Text affected
BS ISO 23865:2021
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 23865
First edition
2021-01
Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic

testing — General use of full matrix
capture/total focusing technique
(FMC/TFM) and related technologies
Essais non destructifs — Contrôle par ultrasons — Utilisation
générale de l’acquisition de la matrice intégrale/technique de
focalisation en tous points (FMC/FTP) et de techniques associées
Reference number
ISO 23865:2021(E)
© ISO 2021
BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT

© ISO 2021
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Contents Page
Foreword......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv
1 Scope.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
4 Principle of the technique........................................................................................................................................................................... 2
4.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
4.2 Comparison between FMC/TFM and PAUT.................................................................................................................... 3
5 Requirements for surface condition and couplant............................................................................................................ 4
6 Information required prior to testing............................................................................................................................................. 5
6.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
6.2 Items to define prior to procedure development....................................................................................................... 5
7 Requirements for test personnel......................................................................................................................................................... 5
8 Requirements for test equipment....................................................................................................................................................... 5
8.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
8.2 Instrument................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
8.3 Probes.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
8.4 Scanning mechanisms....................................................................................................................................................................... 7
8.5 Sampling frequency............................................................................................................................................................................. 7
8.6 Data processing....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
8.7 Evaluation of TFM indications.................................................................................................................................................... 8
9 Benefits of various imaging paths....................................................................................................................................................... 8
10 Preparation for testing.................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
10.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9
10.2 System checking...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
10.3 Sensitivity correction...................................................................................................................................................................... 10
10.4 Sensitivity setting............................................................................................................................................................................... 11
10.5 Grid verification................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
10.6 Preparation of scanning surfaces.......................................................................................................................................... 11
10.7 Couplant...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
11 Test procedure......................................................................................................................................................................................................11
12 Data storage.............................................................................................................................................................................................................12
13 Interpretation and analysis of TFM images............................................................................................................................12
13.1 General......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
13.2 Assessing the quality of TFM images................................................................................................................................. 13
13.3 Identification of relevant TFM indications................................................................................................................... 13
14 Test report................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13
15 Typical influences and compensation mechanisms......................................................................................................14
Annex A (informative) Comparison of FMC/TFM technique with conventional phased array
ultrasonic testing (PAUT)..........................................................................................................................................................................15
Annex B (informative) FMC/TFM and alternative acquisition and imaging techniques..............................18
Annex C (informative) Checking of the FMC/TFM setup, ROI and grid...........................................................................22
Annex D (informative) Recommended settings and examples of FMC/TFM images........................................26
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved iii

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/
iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by the IIW, International Institute of Welding, Commission V, NDT and
Quality Assurance of Welded Products.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
iv © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

BS ISO 23865:2021
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 23865:2021(E)
Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — General

use of full matrix capture/total focusing technique (FMC/
TFM) and related technologies
IMPORTANT — The electronic file of this document contains colours which are considered to be
useful for the correct understanding of the document. Users should therefore consider printing
this document using a colour printer.
1 Scope
This document gives general provisions for applying ultrasonic testing with arrays using FMC/TFM
techniques and related technologies. It is intended to promote the adoption of good practice either at
the manufacturing stage or for in-service testing of existing installations or for repairs.
Some examples of applications considered in this document deal with characterization and sizing in
damage assessment.
Materials considered are low-alloyed carbon steels and common aerospace grade aluminium and
titanium alloys, provided they are homogeneous and isotropic, but some recommendations are given
for other materials (e.g. austenitic ones).
This document does not include acceptance levels for discontinuities.
For the application of FMC/TFM to testing of welds, see ISO 23864.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 5577, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — Vocabulary
ISO 9712, Non-destructive testing — Qualification and certification of NDT personnel
ISO 16810, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — General principles
ISO 18563-1, Non-destructive testing — Characterization and verification of ultrasonic phased array
equipment — Part 1: Instruments
ISO 18563-2, Non-destructive testing — Characterization and verification of ultrasonic phased array
equipment — Part 2: Probes
ISO 23243, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing with arrays - Vocabulary.
3 Terms and definitions

For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 5577, ISO 23243 and the
following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://w ww.iso.org/obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http://w ww.electropedia.org/
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 1

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

3.1
full matrix capture/total focusing technique
FMC/TFM
assembly of a data acquisition scheme and imaging scheme, whereby the acquisition scheme involves
a full matrix capture, and the imaging scheme involves a total focusing technique, and where the data
acquisition and imaging scheme may be performed with several similar technologies.
Note 1 to entry: TFM is often indicated as "total focusing method" but, in this document, the term "method" in
NDT is reserved for applying a physical principle (see ISO 9712).
3.2
FMC/TFM setup
probe arrangement defined by probe characteristics (e.g. frequency, probe element size, wave mode),
probe position, and the number of probes.
Note 1 to entry: Unless stated otherwise, in this document “TFM” and “FMC” refer to the techniques as defined in
ISO 23243, and to all related technologies see for example Annex B and ISO 23243.
4 Principle of the technique
4.1 General
Both FMC/TFM and phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) use an array probe where each element
of the array is independent of the others. Physical characteristics related to the propagation of waves
from the elements of the array govern the capabilities of both techniques in a similar way. In standard
PAUT, as in ISO 13588, the active aperture is used to generate sound beams for testing.
In comparison, the FMC/TFM approach typically uses the entire array in order to achieve the best
possible focused imaging performance because for effective focusing the test volume should be within
the near-field region of the array, which is maximized by using the entire array. In the PAUT technique,
the beams can also be "focused" in a similar way to FMC/TFM by using large apertures or the entire
array to create beams that concentrate the sound pressure to specific points, by ensuring that these
focal points are within the near-field region of the aperture.
Various imaging paths as described in Table 1 may be used.
Table 1 — - Description of the imaging paths

Imaging path Examples Description
T-T transmitter path direct, receiver path
direct
L-L
NOTE 1 All figures are schematic, not to scale. Due to the principle of reciprocity, transmitter and receiver can be swapped,
meaning that the whole path can be followed in the opposite direction. The direction of the arrows for the paths shown in
this table is arbitrary. Drawings are intended to illustrate the assumptions made on the imaging path for calculation of the
image and do not intend to imply beam forming or focusing of ultrasonic waves.
NOTE 2 The use of indirect imaging paths, especially those aiming at producing an image representative of the reflectors
shape, require an accurate assessment of the actual component physical properties, such as ultrasonic wave velocity, wall
thickness or non-flat surfaces. This can be compensated for in post-processing or by using an adaptive imaging algorithm.
NOTE 3 L corresponds to longitudinal wave mode and T to transversal wave mode.
2 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Table 1 (continued)
Imaging path Examples Description
T-TT, TT-T transmitter path direct, receiver path
indirect
LL-L, L-LL
or
LT-T, T-TL
transmitter path indirect, receiver
TT-L, L-TT
path direct
OR
TT-TT transmitter path indirect, receiver
path indirect
LL-LL
TL-LT
L-L transmitter path direct, receiver path

direct
T-T
(using separate arrays with a known
distance)
TT-TT transmitter path indirect, receiver

path indirect
LL-LL
(using separate arrays with a known
TL-LT
distance)
NOTE 1 All figures are schematic, not to scale. Due to the principle of reciprocity, transmitter and receiver can be swapped,
meaning that the whole path can be followed in the opposite direction. The direction of the arrows for the paths shown in
this table is arbitrary. Drawings are intended to illustrate the assumptions made on the imaging path for calculation of the
image and do not intend to imply beam forming or focusing of ultrasonic waves.
NOTE 2 The use of indirect imaging paths, especially those aiming at producing an image representative of the reflectors
shape, require an accurate assessment of the actual component physical properties, such as ultrasonic wave velocity, wall
thickness or non-flat surfaces. This can be compensated for in post-processing or by using an adaptive imaging algorithm.
NOTE 3 L corresponds to longitudinal wave mode and T to transversal wave mode.
4.2 Comparison between FMC/TFM and PAUT

PAUT applies different time delays to the elements of the active aperture in order to control the sound
beam within the test object. This results in a beam as governed by the constructive and destructive
interference of the wavelets from each element of the active aperture. During the reception phase, the
elementary signals are summed to give a single A-scan. In addition to being able to "steer" the beam
through a range of angles, in PAUT each beam can also be controlled to focus the sound pressure within
the near-field region of the active aperture.
In comparison, TFM is a post-processing or imaging technique applied to FMC signals that does not
create beams within the test object during the transmission phase. Instead, the sound field transmitted
into the component emanates from one element of the array and the echoes generated within the
component due to this sound field are then recorded on all elements of the array, as illustrated in
Figure 1. Successive firing of individual elements on the array and recording of resultant echoes on all
elements is termed full matrix capture (FMC).

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

a) Firing of first element and wave front travel- d) Wave front just before arrival at the ele-
ling into the test object ments of the array
b) Wave front just before arrival at a discontinui- e) Signals being collected on all the ele-
ty in the test object ments of the array
c) Reflected or diffracted echo(es) from the f) Process continued by firing element 2 and
discontinuity returning back in the direction of repeated until the last element N of the array
the array is fired
Key
1 wave front transmitted by element 1
2 discontinuity
3 wave front reflected or diffracted by the discontinuity
4 receiving elements
5 wave front transmitted by element 2
Figure 1 — Typical example of points in time describing the FMC data collection process
The FMC data can then be processed by algorithms that operate on the data matrix to create images
of the echoes from the component. Total focusing technique (TFM) is a term used to describe one such
algorithm that applies calculated delay laws to the FMC data in order to focus the sound on many points
within a defined region of interest (ROI) (see Annex B for details). This imaging phase (where TFM is
applied on the FMC data) is computationally intensive but modern systems are able to achieve near
real-time imaging performance.
A more detailed comparison is given in Annex A.
5 Requirements for surface condition and couplant

Care shall be taken that the surface condition meets at least the requirements given in ISO 16810. Since,
typically, only individual elements are used as transmitter and any diffracted signal can also be weak,
the degradation of signal quality due to poor surface condition has a severe impact on testing reliability.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Different coupling media can be used but their type shall be compatible with the materials to be
examined. Examples are water (possibly containing an agent, e.g. wetting, anti-freeze, corrosion
inhibitor), contact paste, oil, grease, cellulose paste containing water, etc.
The characteristics of the coupling medium shall remain constant throughout the examination. It shall
be suitable for the temperature range in which it will be used.
6 Information required prior to testing
6.1 General
ISO 18563-3 gives useful information.
6.2 Items to define prior to procedure development

Before any testing can begin, the operator shall have access to all the information as specified below:
a) purpose and extent of testing;
b) reporting criteria;
c) manufacturing or operation stage at which the testing is to be carried out;
d) type(s) of parent material and product form (i.e. cast, forged, rolled);
e) geometrical characteristics (especially when reflection is used);
f) requirements for access and surface conditions and temperature;
g) time of testing relative to any heat treatment (if any);
h) acceptance criteria and sizing methodologies shall be defined by specification and provided before
testing (to be adapted when recommendations for the application cases are written).
In case of any suspicion of anisotropy in the material to be tested, special care shall be taken.
7 Requirements for test personnel

Personnel performing testing in accordance with this document shall be qualified to an appropriate UT
level in accordance with ISO 9712 or equivalent in the relevant product or industrial sector.
In addition to general knowledge of ultrasonic testing, the operators shall be familiar with and have
practical experience in the use of FMC/TFM technique or related technology.
Specific training and examination shall be performed with the finalized ultrasonic testing procedures
and selected ultrasonic testing equipment on representative samples containing natural or artificial
reflectors similar to those expected. These training and examination results shall be documented.
8 Requirements for test equipment
8.1 General
The FMC acquisition process requires a system able to fire the elements one by one and collect the
individual element signals from the array probe. Other processes may be used including adaptive
processes (see Annex B).

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

The TFM process can require a fast processing capability and a large memory capacity to handle the
large amount of data from the FMC acquisition. Alternative processes may be applied using smaller
memory capacity (e.g. based on plane wave imaging, PWI).
8.2 Instrument
FMC/TFM instruments may display images of the same type as conventional PA instruments (B-Scan,
C-Scan, D-Scan) but may also provide other types of images.
The ultrasonic instrument used for the FMC/TFM testing shall be in accordance with the requirements
of ISO 18563-1, if applicable.
The ultrasonic instrument shall be able to acquire a full or partial matrix and either process it by itself or
transmit it to a computer for post-processing. It is recommended that the length of the acquired A-scan
is sufficient, considering the imaging path that will be processed or post-processed. It is recommended
that the bandwidth of the ultrasonic system is sufficient to receive signals of at least two times the
centre frequency of the probe, and that high- and low-pass filters are set to appropriate values, e.g.
high-pass set not higher than half the centre frequency and low-pass set to at least twice the centre
frequency. The specific values selected for these parameters, if applicable, shall be explicitly specified
within the written procedure.
The data visualized after a TFM process is generally a region of interest (ROI) which is a grid where
each grid point represents the computed amplitude (see 4.2 and Annex B). Grids are usually regular,
e.g. rectangular, but can be arbitrary (even 3D). Regular grids are usually preferred (e.g. to allow
optimization in order to enhance the number of images per second).
The grid spacing shall be selected small enough to be able to detect the relevant discontinuities. The
minimum spatial resolution of data points within the image (i.e. grid point spacing) shall be chosen such
that the amplitude of a reference reflector is stable within a specified tolerance on small deviations in
the probe position. Annex C contains guidance on validation of the amplitude stability.
8.3 Probes
Any linear or matrix array probe can be used for FMC acquisition, but this document is limited to the
use of linear phased array probe. Ultrasonic arrays used for the FMC/TFM testing shall be in accordance
with the requirements of ISO 18563-2.
The TFM process requires information on the element positions relative to the test object, including
details of the delay line or wedge, in order to compute the times of flight associated to the imaging
path(s).
Probes in direct contact to the test object can be used but also delay lines, angled wedges or immersion
can be used depending on the application. Required details of the delay line or wedge include the type,
dimensions, angle and sound velocity.
In order to achieve good quality images, the following properties of the array probe should be taken
into consideration:
a) adequately small pitch to avoid spatial aliasing;
b) highly damped elements to decrease the length of the ultrasonic wave train;
c) sufficiently small elements to avoid too much directivity;
d) appropriate aperture and elevation to allow for imaging at a distance away from the probe, as the
TFM algorithm has optimal results in the near-field of the probe;
e) wedge dimension optimized for effectiveness.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Typically, these requirements are fulfilled by a probe with relative bandwidth >60 % and an element
pitch that is smaller than half the wavelength as determined in the wedge (or in the part under testing
when no wedge is used).
The number of dead elements on the active aperture should be less than or equal to 1 out of 16 and any
dead elements are not allowed to be adjacent to each other. If this criterion is not met, the probe may be
used provided appropriate technical justification is given.
8.4 Scanning mechanisms

To achieve consistency of the images (collected data), guiding mechanisms may be used and scan
encoder(s) shall be used.
The scan increment setting in the primary scanning direction is dependent on the thickness to be
examined. Recommended values are given in Table 2.
Other values may be used provided appropriate technical justification is provided.
The scan increment settings perpendicular to the primary scanning direction, when applicable, shall be
chosen in order to ensure the coverage of the test volume.
An additional function of scanning mechanisms is to provide position information in order to enable
the generation of position-related FMC/TFM images.
Table 2 — Scan increment values in the primary scanning direction in accordance with
thickness
Dimensions in millimetres
Thickness
Scan increment
t
t ≤ 6 0,5
6 < t ≤ 10 1
10 < t ≤ 150 2
t > 150 3
Scanning mechanisms in FMC/TFM can either be motorized or manually driven. They shall be guided by
means of a suitable guiding mechanism. The tolerances for the probe position depend on the application
and it shall be given in the written test procedure.
The scanning speed shall be suitable for the equipment used in order to avoid loss of data.
8.5 Sampling frequency

The sampling frequency of the A-scans should be at least five times the nominal centre frequency of the
probe. If interpolation (up-sampling) of the A-scans is used, the hardware sampling frequency may be
as low as three times the upper cut-off frequency (-6 dB) of the probe.
The theoretical limit according to the Nyquist sampling theorem is twice the upper frequency of the
signal, but additional margin should be provided for non-ideal filters before analogue-to-digital
conversion.
8.6 Data processing

The processing of A-scan data based on time of flight (from the transmitter to an image point and back
to the receiver) is generally referred to as imaging. This is the basis of TFM. Optionally, the processing
algorithms can also take into account physical parameters to improve the quality of the resulting image,
like directivity, divergence, attenuation, reflectivity, transmission coefficients and apodization.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

A detailed description of TFM is given in 4.2 and Annex B. Descriptions of related technologies are given
in ISO 23243 and Annex B, such as sampling phased array (SPA), plane wave imaging (PWI) and inverse
wave field extrapolation (IWEX).
Once the data has been processed into an image, additional image processing may be applied afterwards
for further optimization/visualization.
8.7 Evaluation of TFM indications

The recommended sizing methods are:
a) extraction of signals scattered (diffracted) from different points on the discontinuity and deducing
the extent of the discontinuity based on images of the diffracted signals;
b) using amplitude drop with respect to the maximum TFM indication response to establish the
extent of the discontinuity.
In accordance with the application requirements, other sizing methods may be used.
9 Benefits of various imaging paths

By including boundary reflections in the path from transmitter to receiver, discontinuities in the
ROI can be imaged from different directions using both reflection and diffraction signals, which can
improve the performance and reliability of testing.
Volumetric discontinuities resulting in reflection (in many directions) and edges of discontinuities
resulting in diffraction (in many directions) are typically detected with each imaging path that covers
the region of the discontinuity.
In general, discontinuities with an orientation (planar discontinuities) are best detected with imaging
paths (see Table 3) where the incident angle and reflected angle on the discontinuity are:
a) (about) perpendicular to the discontinuity orientation;
b) (about) symmetric to the normal direction of the discontinuity; or
c) according to Snell’s law if mode conversion occurs at the discontinuity.
Table 3 — Advantages of different imaging paths

Imaging path Orientation of discontinuities for
reflection
Discontinuities with (near) horizontal
orientation.
Discontinuities with other orientations
depending on incident and reflected
angles.
Discontinuities with (near) vertical

orientation.
Discontinuities with other orientations if
mode conversion occurs in the path.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Table 3 (continued)
Imaging path Orientation of discontinuities for
reflection

orientation.
Discontinuities with other orientations
depending on incident and reflected
angles.

orientation.

orientation.
10 Preparation for testing
10.1 General
The purpose of the testing shall be defined by specification. Based on this, the test volume to be
inspected shall be determined.
The surface temperature of the object under test shall be in the range 0 °C to 50 °C. For temperatures
outside this range, the suitability of the equipment and couplant shall be verified.
Imaging approaches such as TFM require knowledge of a number of parameters related to the
measurement system, array, setup geometry and material properties. This clause provides an overview
of parameters considered relevant for imaging.
10.2 System checking

System check/setup shall take into account the following:
a) element sensitivity, dead elements and amplitude balancing may be applied if required;
b) wedge parameters (velocity, angle, dimensions).
Any corrections due to these items shall be reported as specified in the test procedure.
The minimum items to be checked are listed below:
a) calibration checking;
b) coverage checking;
c) sensitivity checking and settings;
d) settings to be taken into account to achieve an appropriate level of detection;
e) sizing/characterization (surfaces, body) assessment;
f) aspects to be defined in a procedure;

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

g) calibration/reference/qualification blocks;
h) aspects to set in a report.
Additional aspects can need to be addressed depending on application cases.
10.3 Sensitivity correction

For general applications, sensitivity can be corrected using 3 mm diameter SDHs (side drilled holes), for
example in a calibration block (e.g. ISO 19675).
If required for the application, and if the processing does not take all propagation effects into account,
then amplitude correction may be applied. Amplitude calibration for TFM is similar to time corrected
gain (TCG) or angle corrected gain (ACG) in PAUT calibration: the probe is moved over a set of SDHs
located at different depths in a reference block as defined in Table 4.
NOTE Simulated sensitivity corrections are possible.
The amplitude on each SDH is recorded for a horizontal line in the ROI, over its complete width, by
moving the probe over the SDHs as shown in Figure 2. A correction is then established by determining
the gain necessary to adjust the response of each SDH to the desired level, along the horizontal line in
the ROI corresponding to the position of each SDH. Gain levels for the points in the vertical direction
between the horizontal lines corresponding to the SDHs are derived by interpolation.
a) b) c)
Key
1 side drilled holes
2 ROI
3 probe
a Probe movement.
Figure 2 — Illustration of probe movement over SDHs for sensitivity correction
Any reference block with a sufficient number of SDHs divided equally over the height of the ROI in
accordance with Table 4 may be used.
Table 4 — Number of SDH to use in accordance with ROI height

ROI height, h Depth difference between 2 adja-
Minimum number of SDH
mm cent SDH
≤ 10 1 N/A
10 < h ≤ 40 3 N/A
>40 N/A <20 % h

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

10.4 Sensitivity setting

If requested, the test sensitivity shall be set/verified on a reference reflector that is representative of
the discontinuities to be detected.
If multiple imaging paths (TTT, TTL, etc.) are used, then the sensitivity needs to be calibrated
individually. For in-service situations, this can be difficult without a suitable reference piece. Depending
on the application, TFM indications stemming from the geometry or the noise level of the test object can
be used as well.
10.5 Grid verification

Guidance for grid verification is given in Annex C.
10.6 Preparation of scanning surfaces

Scanning surfaces shall be clean in an area wide enough to permit the testing volume to be fully covered.
Scanning surfaces shall be even and free from foreign matter likely to interfere with probe coupling
(e.g. rust, loose scale, weld spatter, notches, grooves). The condition of the test surface shall result in a
gap not exceeding 0,5 mm between the probe and the surface. These requirements shall be ensured by
dressing the scanning surface as necessary.
Scanning surfaces may be assumed to be satisfactory if the surface roughness, Ra, is not greater than
6,3 µm for machined surfaces, or not greater than 12,5 µm for shot-blasted surfaces.
When coating such as paint is present and cannot be removed, reference or test blocks with identical
coating are required. In addition, the required corrective actions shall be determined and applied.
When using an adaptable probe shoe or (local) immersion technique, the surface condition shall be
sufficiently smooth to ensure good imaging results.
10.7 Couplant
In order to generate good images, a couplant shall be used which provides a constant transmission of
ultrasound between the probe(s) and the test object. The couplant used for calibration shall be the same
as that used in subsequent testing.
When using a conformable shoe or (local) immersion technique, requirements on the couplant,
determination of sound velocity including temperature dependency and verification of coupling shall
be clearly documented in the written procedure.
11 Test procedure
For any ultrasonic examination, an examination procedure shall be established. In addition to the
requirements stated in this document, at least the following details shall be included, as applicable:
a) description of the products to be examined;
b) reference documents;
c) qualification and certification of examination personnel;
d) state of examination object;
e) test volume;
f) testing techniques;
g) preparation of scanning surfaces;

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

h) coupling medium;
i) description of examination equipment;
j) environmental conditions;
k) reference and/or calibration blocks, including description of the reflectors;
l) calibration and settings;
m) imaging path(s) to be used;
n) scan plan;
o) description and sequence of examination operations;
p) evaluation and recording levels;
q) characterization of imperfections;
r) acceptance criteria;
s) examination report.
Specific conditions of application and use of the FMC/TFM technique depend on the type of product
examined and any specific requirements shall be described in written examination procedures.
The objective of the testing shall be agreed.
For in-service testing, the effectiveness of the procedure on test blocks having natural discontinuities
should be verified.
Information regarding settings and examples of images for different flaw types are given in Annex D.
For weld testing, ISO 23864 applies.
A satisfactory procedure verification in accordance with the specification required shall take place
before the first inspection. This verification includes:
a) detection of all required reflectors;
b) classification and sizing capability;
c) proof of coverage in depth and width.
12 Data storage
Compared to PAUT, FMC/TFM typically collects a larger volume of A-scan data, corresponding to the
collection of all possible combinations of transmitters and receivers in (an) array probe(s). Images are
computed from the matrix of A-scans either on the acquisition hardware or on a computer connected to
the acquisition hardware. In either case, the amount of A-scan data can be too big to retain.
The constructed images as well as the applied imaging parameters and processing steps shall be stored
on a digital storage medium such as hard disk or IT server and shall be kept for later reference.
13 Interpretation and analysis of TFM images
13.1 General
Interpretation and analysis of TFM images are typically performed as follows:
a) assess the quality of the TFM images;

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

b) identify relevant TFM indications;

c) determine location and size as specified;
d) classify relevant TFM indications as specified;
e) evaluate against acceptance criteria.
13.2 Assessing the quality of TFM images

An FMC/TFM test shall be carried out such that satisfactory images are generated that can be
interpreted with confidence. Satisfactory images are defined by appropriate:
a) coupling;
b) ROI settings;
c) sensitivity settings;
d) signal-to-noise ratio;
e) saturation indicator;
f) data acquisition;
g) tuning of processing parameters.
If the signal to be evaluated is saturated, it shall be rescanned if the amplitude drop measuring method
has been chosen.
Where encoded scanning is performed, a maximum of 5 % of the total number of scan points collected
in one single scan may be missed but no adjacent points shall be missed.
Assessing the quality of FMC/TFM images requires skilled and experienced operators (see Clause 7).
The written test procedure shall give requirements depending on the application whether non-
satisfactory images require new data acquisition (re-scan).
13.3 Identification of relevant TFM indications

The FMC/TFM technique images both discontinuities and geometric features of the test object.
In order to identify TFM indications of geometric features, detailed knowledge of the test object is
necessary.
To decide whether a TFM indication is relevant (caused by a discontinuity), patterns or disturbances
shall be evaluated considering shape and signal amplitude relative to general noise level.
The written test procedure shall give details for the evaluation of TFM indications depending on the
application.
14 Test report
FMC/TFM test reports shall comply with the requirements given in ISO 16810, as applicable.
In addition, FMC/TFM testing reports shall contain the following information:
a) description of the test specimen, any reference and/or test blocks;
b) description of FMC/TFM instrument used, including scanning mechanisms;
c) probe type, frequency, number and size of elements, material and angle(s) of any wedge (or in water
for immersion technique), orientation and position with respect to a reference line;

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

d) plotted images of at least those locations where relevant TFM indications have been detected;
e) results of checking resolution, coverage and grid verification (see Annex C).
Relevant settings of the FMC/TFM technique shall be documented. This should include:
a) sensitivity settings;
b) acquisition process;
c) imaging process;
d) details of the ROI;
e) imaging path(s) used;
f) scan plan;
g) characterization and sizing methodology.
15 Typical influences and compensation mechanisms

Wall thickness variations can lead to images that use imaging paths with a reflection at the back wall
to show discontinuities out of focus and/or in the wrong location. This can be compensated for in post-
processing or by using an adaptive imaging algorithm (see B.5).
Anisotropy caused by an elongated grain structure, e.g. resulting from rolling of steel, causes
discontinuities to be displayed out of focus. This may be compensated for by limiting the aperture
to sound path with a low sound angle, by using angle-dependent sound velocities or with adaptive
algorithms.
Irregular geometries resulting from manufacturing and/or welding method, causing the surface to be
non-flat causes discontinuities to be displayed out of focus if the ultrasound is reflected at, or transmitted
through, this surface. This can be compensated for by using an adaptive algorithm (see B.5).
A potential issue with FMC is that, due to only one array element being pulsed at a time, a limited
amount of energy is emitted by the probe. The consequence is that this energy can diffuse into materials
that are attenuative and/or very thick and not penetrate to flaw locations. This may be compensated
for by using probes that are more appropriate or an alternative acquisition scheme that uses more
transmitting elements (see Annex B for possible alternatives).
When the temperature is outside the range specified in 10.1, correct imaging performance shall be
established using a reference block of the same material as the component under test, containing SDH
targets within the required ROI and with the reference block brought to the same temperature as the
component under test.
Other ultrasonic techniques are also impacted by these properties. However, the influence can be less
recognizable, e.g. when only using A-scan display. By appropriately accounting for these influences
FMC/TFM can allow for a high testing quality in situations where this would not be possible with other
ultrasonic techniques.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Annex A
(informative)
Comparison of FMC/TFM technique with conventional phased

array ultrasonic testing (PAUT)
A.1 Advantages and disadvantages

Tables A.1 and A.2 present the advantages and disadvantages of the FMC/TFM technique in comparison
to PAUT, respectively. Table A.1 highlights application cases where FMC/TFM can offer significant
advantages over PAUT.
Table A.1 — Advantages of FMC/TFM over PAUT for ultrasonic testing

Aspect PAUT FMC/TFM Applications for FMC/TFM
Beams can be focused to a All points (defined by
Sizing discontinuities dur-
limited locus, usually a con- a high-resolution grid)
ing testing, in particular
Focusing stant depth, projected plane within the ROI can be fo-
the detection of diffracted
or a constant ultrasonic cused during the imaging
echoes from crack tips.
distance along the beams. process using TFM.
If unfocused beams are used
In a TFM image, optimal
then the spatial resolution
resolution is achieved
of PAUT is poor, with the
Spatial resolution at all points within a
primary aim being detection Sizing discontinuities dur-
well-conditioned ROI.
(ability to resolve of discontinuities rather ing testing, in particular
Point reflectors in the ROI,
two or several closely than sizing. If focusing is the ability to better charac-
when spaced apart larger
spaced reflectors) used, then good spatial terize their nature.
than the grid resolution,
resolution can be achieved
image well (without large
but limited to the locus of
arcs) and can be resolved.
focusing.
As the transmitted beams Improved detection of di-
Since the image is created
have well-defined direc- rectional (for example, pla-
by summing multiple
Relative insensitivity tions, the response from nar crack-like) discontinuity
transmit-receive paths
to incidence angle the discontinuities on in or adjacent to welds.
from the elements of the
onto discontinuities, which they are incident is
array, compared to PAUT Improved detection of
discontinuities or dependent on the angle of
there is less sensitivity pitting corrosion and ac-
geometric features incidence, with maximum
on the orientation of the curate mapping of general
reflected energy being for
discontinuity in the ROI. thickness loss.
specular incidence.
Velocities can be changed Accounting for temper-
The velocity of the wave ature variations in the
during post-processing
mode needs to be accurately component.
after data collection and,
Wave mode velocity input for correct calculation
hence, incorrect assump- Advanced imaging of aus-
of the delay laws for accu-
tions can be rectified with- tenitic materials subject to
rate plotting of echoes.
out re-inspecting on site. anisotropy.
Adapting to scanning
The geometric makeup of Geometric assumptions –
surface variations. This
the testing setup needs to regarding the system (e.g.
variation can be gentle cur-
Component geometry be accurately input to the wedge) and the component
vature or rougher condi-
system for correct calcula- – can be modified, and the
tions but there are physical
tion of the delay laws. same data re-processed.
limitations.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Table A.1 (continued)

Aspect PAUT FMC/TFM Applications for FMC/TFM
Generally, large dead zones Multiple transmit-receive
Dead zone Detection of discontinuities
similar to all pulse - echo paths between elements of
close to the scanning sur-
(region beneath the testing using beams where the aperture spread over
face and improved capabili-
scanning surface/ the receive direction is a much larger area of the
ty to inspect components of
front wall echo) identical to the transmit front wall leads to smaller
smaller thickness.
direction. dead zones in the image.
Table A.2 shows possible disadvantage of FMC/TFM at present. As mentioned in the comments column,
many of these disadvantages may not be an issue in the future as rapid advancements are ongoing.
Table A.2 — Disadvantages of FMC/TFM over PAUT for ultrasonic testing

Aspect PAUT FMC/TFM Comment
Data file sizes are orders The large FMC data file can
Data files sizes are similar
of magnitude larger than be discarded after process-
to automated conventional
PAUT and require increased ing but this negates many of
Data file size UT and can be economically
processing capability and the advantages. Digital tech-
handled and archived using
large capacity storage from nology will likely outpace
modern computing systems.
the computing system. this limitation.
FMC/TFM is considered an
Certified training courses No certified training pres-
emerging area but opera-
are widely available and ently available. Theoretical
tor exposure is increasing,
Operator training, increasing acceptance of aspects of PAUT courses
which will lead to greater
certification and PAUT by industry is leading need modification for FMC/
levels of competency in
competency to personnel with sufficient TFM but practical aspects
specific areas of application
exposure to gain good, wide can utilize similar probes
where FMC/TFM offers
competency. and specimens for training.
improved capability.
Typically, use many inde- Viable, field-deployable
Typically make use of multi-
pendent pulser-receiver equipment are available in
plexers in order to address
units that address array the market and more are
more elements than the
Instrumentation probes with many elements being designed for indus-
available number of inde-
in order to increase near- try to be able to make an
pendent on-board pulser-re-
field regions for effective economic case for choosing
ceiver units.
focusing. FMC-TFM.
Accurate knowledge of Techniques to verify local
When using beams, incor- geometry – in particular geometrical variations
rect knowledge of compo- when using skipping from should be implemented
nent geometry – particular- surfaces such as back when using imaging algo-
ly when the back wall may walls – is critical for the rithms that rely on reflec-
not be parallel to the top imaging algorithms that tion from the geometry. The
Unknown/variable
surface when relying on a implement summing of influence of geometry and
geometry of compo-
skipping technique – can elementary signals based on correctly accounting for
nent being inspected
lead to the echoes from times-of- flight. When there its variation is illustrated
component geometry and/ is discrepancy between well by the improvements
or discontinuities, plotting reality and assumptions achieved when using Adap-
incorrectly and/or with in geometry, there can be tive TFM (ATFM) approach
reduced echo amplitudes. significant degradation in to varying top surface
imaging performance. profiles.
The nature of attenuative
Beams generated using a The sound pressure from
materials and the presence
number of elements in an individual transmitting
of anisotropy or scatter-
Highly attenuative aperture can penetrate elements during the FMC
ing agents (such as coarse
materials longer distances into atten- process can be attenuated
grains) can lead to signif-
uative materials by generat- in such materials, leading to
icant degradation of all
ing high sound pressures. poor imaging performance.
forms of ultrasonic testing.
Figure A.1 illustrates the core operating concepts behind PAUT [Figure A.1 a)] and FMC/TFM
[Figure A.1 b)], highlighting the point at which data from the component is collected. This is the key

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

advantage that FMC based testing has: it allows the technique to be created after the act of data
collection. This offers significant economic advantages to industry, allowing for future reassessments
and monitoring of a holistic record of the component that was inspected.
a) PAUT b) FMC/TFM
Figure A.1 — Illustration of the core operating concepts

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Annex B
(informative)
FMC/TFM and alternative acquisition and imaging techniques
B.1 General
The scope of this document allows for alternatives to both the data collection scheme and the imaging
scheme, together making up the technique. This annex gives a description of the basic FMC/TFM
technique and some alternatives.
Due to historical reasons, the naming of the acquisition schemes and imaging schemes is not always
logical or does not follow the conventions used in NDT, where a method denotes the physical measurement
principle (e.g. ultrasonic testing) and a technique is the implementation of the physical measurement
principle (e.g. pulse–echo technique, immersion technique). An example of such an inconsistency is the
naming of total focussing method, which should have been a technique in accordance with ISO naming
conventions. Another example is plane wave imaging, which is an acquisition scheme in the context of
this document, and not an imaging scheme.
Alternatives to the acquisition scheme treated in this annex include half-matrix capture (HMC), sparse
matrix capture (SMC), plane wave imaging (PWI) and virtual source aperture (VSA). Alternatives to
the imaging scheme include adaptive TFM (ATFM) and TFM over multiple imaging paths. Additionally,
the relationship to techniques that were historically developed independently from TFM, but are very
similar, such as inverse wavefield extrapolation (IWEX) and sampling phased array (SPA), is mentioned.
B.2 FMC/TFM acquisition and imaging process

B.2.1 FMC acquisition process
As explained in 4.2, FMC consists of recording all the signals corresponding to all the possible pairs of
transmitting and receiving elements on the array. To do that, each element is successively fired and at
each step, the signals received on all the active elements are recorded. The outcome of this operation
is the “full matrix” of the N2 signals Si,j(t) where (i,j) denotes the transmitter-receiver pair of elements
and N is the number of elements of the array.
In the case of FMC acquisition, the acquired signals in one probe position are the N × N signals Si,j(t)
corresponding to the N × N pairs (i,j) of transmitter-receiver elements on the array.
B.2.2 TFM imaging process

Amongst the different schemes that can be proposed for imaging FMC data, the TFM algorithm is most
widely used. This processing algorithm is based on delay and sum processing. The basic idea is to sum
echoes arising from discontinuities coherently in order to maximize amplitudes where discontinuities
are located. Thus, the signals are synthetically focused on a grid of points constituting the imaged zone.
The output is a map of amplitudes, which are higher if there is correlation between echoes from the
different signals. This approach originates from synthetic aperture radar, and it was initially introduced
for conventional ultrasonic testing by the synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFT).
Different names and acronyms have been used in the literature to designate array imaging based on this
synthetic focusing algorithm, e.g. multi SAFT, IWEX, SPA. The acronym TFM can refer to the processing
algorithm itself independently of the type of acquisition (FMC or others) carried out with the array.
That means that the TFM algorithm can be applied to various acquisitions and not only to FMC.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

The TFM algorithm applied to FMC is carried out in 2 steps.

a) Computation step: the times of flight tij(P) are calculated by considering geometrical acoustic
paths (rays verifying Snell-Descartes laws). tij(P) = TiP + TjP where TiP (respectively, TjP) is the
time corresponding to the ray linking the centre of the element i (respectively, j) to grid point P.
The small size of the elements in practice makes this simple geometrical model good enough for
practical applications.
b) Summation step: the amplitude at points P of the image are calculated by summation of the Si,j (TiP
+ TjP). The image intensity at each grid point is given by Formula (B.1).
N N
I(P)= ∑ ∑ sij (TiP +TjP ). (B.1)
i =1 j=1
Note that beyond the general form of the algorithm, variations can exist that mainly concern:
a) the numerical scheme used to compute the times of flight;
b) the implementation scheduling (different versions and optimizations related to the
implementation in software/firmware of the test equipment);
c) the grid of computation points and the interpolation between these points;
d) the possibility to sum the amplitudes after signal processing;
e) the option to assign different weighting factors to the contributions of A-scans to one image
point (e.g. IWEX).
a) Acquisition b) Processing
Full matrix capture : N × N signals, sij(t) Sum of the amplitudes of the captured signals at
the computed times of flight, tij(P)
Key
1 N elements
2 image grid
Figure B.1 — TFM processing applied to FMC acquisition

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

B.3 Alternative acquisition scheme to FMC

B.3.1 General
Alternative acquisition schemes to FMC may be used. A different (typically smaller) set of signals is
collected and processed in the same way as FMC signals are. The objective is to reduce the processing
time by reducing the number of signals to be processed or to enhance the signal-to-noise-ratio (S/N).
Three main ways can be considered (see B.3.2 to B.3.4).
B.3.2 Acquisition of a subset of the full matrix

A subset of the full matrix of signals may be acquired by selecting fewer transmitter-receiver pairs as
follows:
a) half-matrix capture (HMC): acquisition of only half of the signals by considering the redundancy
of pairs of elements due to transmission-reception reciprocity. This technique leads to N*(N+1)/2
A-scans without (theoretically) loss of acquired information. Note that the S/N of the resulting
image may be lower than for an image obtained from full matrix capture;
b) synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFT) capture: called by analogy with the SAFT technique
this scheme consists in acquiring only the signals Sii of the matrix corresponding to the same
transmitter and receiver. Practically, this technique amounts to electronically scanning the acting
element over the array. This technique leads to N A-scans;
c) sparse matrix capture: this term refers to the possibility to select in a deterministic or random way
a subset of active transmitters and/or receivers giving a subset of the FMC data.
B.3.3 Application of delay laws

Delay laws may be applied in order to form beams during transmission as follows:
a) plane wave imaging (PWI): this technique consists in transmitting plane waves at n different
angles by applying adequate delays to the transmitters on the array. The signals are collected on
the N elements of the array, leading to n * N signals to be processed (typically n < N);
b) virtual sources: this technique aims at creating “virtual sources” in the part transmitting higher
energy than the individual elements of the array. The objective is to enhance S/N in case of noisy
materials. The acquisition consists of dividing the array into active sub-apertures on which delay
laws are applied in order to focus ultrasound at selected points close to the array, which then act as
virtual sources. Every sub-aperture is associated with one virtual source. The set of virtual sources
behaves as a virtual array. The number of signals is n*N, where n is the number of sub-apertures on
the array.
B.3.4 Application of coded excitation to the array

This technique consists in firing successive shots with the whole array but with a selection of active
elements driven by a numerical code. This technique aims at increasing S/N in attenuative materials.
B.4 Reconstruction of multiple imaging paths

Discontinuities can be detected by different mechanisms along different imaging paths (including tip
diffraction, reflection, corner echoes and mode conversion).
The implementation of TFM for multiple imaging paths consist of:
a) selection of several imaging paths;
b) computation of an image for each imaging path, by applying a computation step and a summation
step as described in B.2.2.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

The result of this processing may be displayed as one image incorporating images of several paths or as
separate images corresponding to selected imaging paths.
B.5 Adaptive TFM

In some cases, the times of flight, tij(P), is not known exactly, for example due to the imaging path
containing an interface whose position is not exactly known. A typical example is the shape of a weld
cap, which is irregular. In the adaptive TFM (ATFM) algorithm, in a first step, a measurement is made
of the position of the interface based on the information in the FMC data. The times of flight tij(P) are
subsequently adjusted based on this information, and a TFM image is made based on the adjusted time
of flight.
Similar processes may be repeated in multiple steps, for additional unknown properties in the ROI.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Annex C
(informative)
Checking of the FMC/TFM setup, ROI and grid
C.1 Overview
C.1.1 General
This annex gives guidance on checking the FMC/TFM setup, ROI and grid. Due to FMC/TFM being an
imaging method consisting of a data acquisition and an imaging step, which both involve sampling,
special care needs to be taken for the grid point spacing. Coverage and resolution are implicitly tested
with the procedure described below as well. Sensitivity can also be checked, as the procedure is
performed in the same arrangement as the amplitude correction procedure described in 10.3.
In the practical implementation of the basic TFM algorithm, each point in the image is reconstructed
by shifting A-scans in time base in the full matrix of data and adding the values of the A-scans for the
grid point position. Since the A-scan consists of ultrasonic unrectified and unfiltered signals, received
signals have a cyclic nature with the frequency of the ultrasound. If the grid point density of the image
is insufficient, it is possible that successive A-scans have an opposite phase and cancel each other out.
The amplitude of a small reflector thus increases and decreases on small changes to the probe position
if the grid is chosen too coarse.
C.1.2 Image resolution

In common language, when discussing imaging, resolution can mean two things:
a) the amount or density of grid points in a display or image;
b) the ability to resolve closely spaced objects independently.
In this document, both are discussed. Item a) is addressed by the terms grid count and grid point
spacing, while item b) is addressed by the term resolution.
When an application requires a specified resolving power, the test procedure should indicate the
approach to verify this. The test procedure can for example rely on reference blocks containing a
series of pairs of side drilled holes (SDHs) of different diameters separated by a distance equal to their
diameters.
C.1.3 Resolution and ROI grid spacing

The required grid point spacing is determined by the following factors:
a) resolution required for the testing;
b) overall area to be covered;
c) processing power/required speed;
d) grid point spacing required to obtain an image with a stable amplitude.
Typically, FMC/TFM is used either for the imaging capability or for enhanced sizing capability.
Depending on what is required, the grid may be set up coarser or finer. However, the amplitude stability
has a relationship with the wavelength and in a grid set too coarse small reflectors can be missed or
undersized.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

For basic FMC/TFM, a stable amplitude is achieved when the grid point spacing is smaller than one
fifth of the wavelength (λ/5). Since the amplitude stability is impacted by many factors (e.g. probe
characteristics) and since other implementations exist for which this rule does not hold, a procedure is
described here that allows for checking of amplitude stability over the ROI.
C.2 Amplitude stability verification procedure

C.2.1 Equipment and tools
This procedure is intended for use with FMC/TFM equipment running the same software release that
will be used during the testing.
The procedure should be performed with:
a) probe and wedge of the same manufacturer and model as the one used in the testing;
b) test block or a reference block with a vertical row of SDHs (e.g. ISO 19675);
c) optionally a clamp, e.g. a ratchet bar clamp, to keep the probe in place on the block.
The direction in which the ROI is be moved during this test depends on the setup:
— if the ROI is mainly below the array (top scanning as defined in ISO 23864), then the ROI shall be
moved in vertical direction;
— if the ROI is mainly besides the array (side scanning as defined in ISO 23864), then the ROI shall be
moved in horizontal direction.
Alternatively, for side scanning, a micro adjuster can be used to move the probe on the block instead of
changing the offset of the ROI.
C.2.2 Verification setup

The equipment shall be set up with the ROI settings identical to that used for the intended testing.
During the verification test, only the ROI offset shall be changed.
The equipment shall be set up on the vertical row of SDHs and fixed with the array clamped on three
different positions of the row of SDHs:
a) in the middle of the ROI;
b) approximately 2 mm from the left edge of the ROI;
c) approximately 2 mm from the right edge of the ROI.
The SDH with the highest amplitude shall be set to 80 % screen height.
C.2.3 Verification process

The offset is incremented by a specified amount. The increment amount is calculated using
Formula (C.1):
i = λ /20 (C.1)
where
i is the increment amount;
λ is the wavelength.
Table C.1 provides an example for ferritic carbon steel.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Table C.1 — Example of increment amounts (rounded) for several probe frequencies

Probe frequency λ i
L T L T
MHz mm mm mm mm
1 5,9 3,2 0,30 0,16
2,25 2,6 1,4 0,13 0,07
5 1,2 0,6 0,06 0,03
7,5 0,7 0,4 0,04 0,02
10 0,6 0,3 0,03 0,02
NOTE L means longitudinal waves, T means transverse waves.

The verification process can be applied on real-time displayed TFM images or by post-processing stored
FMC data. The following steps should be followed in order.
— Step 1: Record the maximum amplitude of each of the SDHs in the ROI, in percentage of full-screen
height (FSH), in a table.
— Step 2: Increment the offset by the increment amount.
— Step 3: Compute TFM settings for this offset.
— Step 4: Display the TFM image for this offset. Return to Step 1 until 20 increments have been
performed.
This process shall be performed for each of the three probe positions mentioned in C.2.2.
C.2.4 Result calculation

For each SDH for each probe position in the result table the highest (βH) and the lowest value (βL) shall
be determined as a percentage of FSH. The amplitude stability (β) for each SDH, at each probe position
is calculated using Formula (C.2):
βΗ
β =20.log( ) (C.2)
βL
where
β is the amplitude stability in dB;
βH is the highest amplitude value as a percentage of FSH;
βL is the lowest amplitude value as a percentage of FSH.

The verification has been successfully passed if the amplitude stability values for each SDH at each
probe position are:
— maximum 2dB (i.e. ±1 dB) if the absolute value of the signal amplitude is to be used for sizing;
— maximum 4dB (i.e. ±2 dB) if a type of sizing is used that does not rely on the absolute amplitude of
the signal amplitude.
If the amplitude stability is over the specified value above, the grid point spacing shall be decreased.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

C.2.5 Reporting
The report should contain the three tables produced in the verification process, the amplitude stability
value and the following information:
a) ROI parameters (e.g. a screen shot of the TFM settings window);
b) calculation of the increment amount;
c) three tables with SDH amplitudes and amplitude stability values;
d) settings and equipment used in the testing:
— probe(s);
— wedge(s);
— instrument;
— test block(s);
— software release;
— gain (measurement, interpretation);
— gain correction settings if applicable.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Annex D
(informative)
Recommended settings and examples of FMC/TFM images
D.1 Overview
This annex provides information on how FMC/TFM can be used for detection, characterization and
sizing of a number of damage types commonly found in industry. The information in this annex should
aid in development of specific procedures using FMC/TFM and the settings presented in this annex are
indicative only – specific applications require settings to be selected and verified appropriately.
Note also that other ultrasonic techniques (and other testing methods) can also be used to inspect for
these damage types.
D.2 Application on HTHA or similar damages

D.2.1 General – various type of hydrogen damages
D.2.1.1 High-temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA)
HTHA can be defined as a cracking process due to hydrogen permeation through the steel and reaction
with carbides, leading to micro-cracks. Damage propagates from the surface exposed to hydrogen.
Imperfections can be located in the parent metal or in the weld. The main limitation for detection is that
the cracks need to have sufficiently large individual sizes to interact with ultrasonic beams, regardless
of their orientations.
D.2.1.2 Other hydrogen induced damages
Carbon and low alloy steels can be affected by different forms of cracking mechanisms when they are
exposed to acidic aqueous media containing hydrogen sulphide.
In wet H2S environments, an electrochemical reaction can occur on the surface of pressure vessel walls,
leading to the absorption of hydrogen atoms by the steel.
The diffusion of hydrogen atoms through the metal can have several effects:
a) formation of molecular hydrogen H2 in local areas;
b) decrease in the toughness of the metal;
c) weakening of the metallic bonds.
The combination of these effects can result in different types of failure mechanisms[11]:
a) hydrogen induced cracking (HIC). Stepwise cracking (SWC) and blistering are two specific
forms of HIC;
b) sulphide stress cracking (SSC);
c) stress-oriented hydrogen-induced cracking (SOHIC).
The specific settings described in D.1 used for HTHA may also be applied for detection of HIC in
combination with PAUT beam forming focused scans in order to confirm stepwise cracking.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

The specific settings described in D.4 used for stress corrosion cracking (SCC) may also be applied for
detection of SOHIC.
D.2.2 Specific settings

The FMC/TFM technique can be used as a complementary approach to other non-destructive methods
for the detection of HTHA damage. Such other methods and techniques are described in API RP 941,
which include time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD), backscattering and velocity ratio.
Surface roughness should not exceed 6,5 µm and the geometry should present no waviness of the
surface producing a gap larger than 0,5 mm.
As specified in Clause 10, checking, settings and items to take into account are at a minimum those
required for conventional PAUT beam forming testing (see ISO 13588).
With respect to the detection of HTHA damage, the following settings should be applied.
a) For setting the sensitivity, a reference reflector should be used. It can be either the top of a notch
with a width of 0,2 mm or a side drilled hole (SDH) located at a depth corresponding to the
component thickness with a tolerance of ±20 %. A signal-to-noise ratio of at least 12 dB should
be observed. When SDHs are used, the examination sensitivity should be increased to ensure the
detection of diffraction signals;
b) The amplitude of the reference reflector should be set to between 80 % and 100 % of full screen
height (FSH);
c) A sensitivity correction should be carried out on reflectors located at various depths. Figure D.1
shows the results obtained on the 3 SDHs implemented in the ISO 19675 calibration block;
d) The evaluation is based on any TFM indications that exhibit specific patterns and are detected
above the background noise.
Figure D.1 — Sensitivity correction (Frequency 15 MHz – LL imaging path)
D.2.3 Probes
In order to get the best signal-to-noise ratio resulting from interaction between the sound beam and
HTHA damage, the probe frequency should be between 7 MHz and 15 MHz for compression waves or
between 3,5 MHz and 7,5 MHz for shear waves. The array probes can be either linear or matrix.
The active aperture is to be set as large as possible. The main limitation can be the component contact
surface (curvature, clearance). A minimum of 32 active elements is required.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

D.2.4 Recommended imaging paths

The recommended FMC/TFM imaging paths to use are given in Table D.1.
Table D.1 — Recommended imaging paths for HTHA damage

HTHA damage With side scanning With top scanning
Testing of base material Top scanning is preferred.

Direct imaging path recommended (LL).
Direct contact or 0° wedge.
Welds: testing of heat

Side scanning is preferred.
affected zone
LL or TT imaging path recommended.

NOTE The same imaging path and settings can be used in parent metal for HIC/SWC examinations.
D.2.5 Typical images
D.2.5.1 HTHA images
Typical FMC/TFM images obtained on HTHA damages are provided in the following figures:
— Figure D.2 a) shows a single FMC/TFM image on a damaged steel block having a thickness of 60 mm.
The probe frequency is 7,5 MHz. The LL imaging path was used;
— Figure D.2 b) shows a volumetric merged view of multiple images.
Merged views generally allow obtaining better results.
a) Single FMC/TFM image b) Volumetric merged view
Figure D.2 — FMC/TFM images on HTHA damage
Figure D.3 illustrates the benefits of FMC/TFM to improve the capacity of the operator to discriminate
HTHA patterns from other kinds of damage.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

a) By linear PA normal beam b) By FMC/TFM
Figure D.3 — Comparison of PAUT and FMC/TFM on early HTHA damage
Identification of TFM indications may be based on recognition of specific patterns applied to post
processed images, such as cumulative side views, merged views, specific colour palettes or filters.
These specific patterns should have been previously defined on representative qualification blocks with
known HTHA damages. Simulation tools may be used for generating these patterns. Typical patterns
are related and associated to density and spatial distribution of TFM indications, spatial distribution
of TFM indication’s amplitude versus depth, change of structural noise, identification of "pockets",
"clouds", etc. Example of typical patterns and associated micrographs are given in Reference [12].
Figure D.4 shows an example of such identification based on changes of FMC/TFM image pattern or
texture. Operators trained to recognize specific patterns are also able to discriminate between early
and moderate damages on such images.
a) FMC/TFM image – merged view

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

b) Interpretation of the damaged areas related to the FMC/TFM image

Key
1 early damage
2 moderate damage
Figure D.4 — Detection of early and moderate HTHA damage
Detection of HTHA at early stages remains difficult especially on dirty steels having a lot of inclusions
and can require the use of complementary techniques.
Because there are no ultrasonic acceptance levels dedicated for HTHA, metallurgical expertise is
generally required to provide the interpretation of the TFM indications detected by FMC/TFM testing.
D.2.5.2 HIC/step wise cracking images
Figure D.5 a) is obtained with similar settings as those used for HTHA testing. It shows the detection
of HIC and SWC in a carbon steel plate sample (actual thickness is 13 mm) by top scanning with direct
imaging path (LL).
Figure D.5 b) shows the macro-section of the test object at FMC/TFM image location. Horizontal cracks
(HIC) as well as stepwise cracks (SWC) are highlighted.
a) FMC/TFM image

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

b) Macro section corresponding to the FMC/TFM image

Key
1 HIC
2 SWC
Figure D.5 — Detection of HIC/SWC cracking
D.3 Corrosion testing

D.3.1 Various types of corrosion damages
Corrosion refers to the processes of physiochemical interactions occurring between a metal and its
environment leading to a degradation of the function of the metal.
The following types of corrosion in steel vessels and piping components are to be considered, in
accordance with their location and shape, when selecting the imaging paths to be applied:
a) uniform corrosion;
b) pitting;
c) erosion;
d) deposit attack;
e) crevice corrosion;
f) galvanic corrosion;
g) flow induced corrosion;
h) flow accelerated corrosion;
i) weld zone corrosion;
j) combinations of two or more of the above types of corrosion.
Imperfections to detect can be surface breaking or connected to the opposite scanning surface. Internal
corrosion can be located in parent metal or affect the weld root.

Corrosion mechanisms produce different shapes, location and type of reflecting surfaces. Specific
recommendation regarding the settings to be applied for each case cannot be given, as it would depend
on the access conditions, material thicknesses and other parameters.
The FMC/TFM technique can be used as an alternative or a complementary approach to other non-
destructive techniques for the detection and assessment of corrosion damage. Such other techniques

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

are described in ISO 16809 and EN 17290. PAUT is also increasingly being used to perform corrosion
mapping where the E-scan is used. The probe is mechanically moved perpendicularly to the electronic
scanning direction and a C-scan is produced allowing a high testing rate.
Before applying FMC/TFM for corrosion assessment, it is essential to have knowledge of the type(s)
of material loss to be expected, and to design a test procedure adapted to the specific type of wear,
corrosion or erosion likely to occur, taking into account the location of the corrosion and it shape.
It is recommended to verify the test procedure on test blocks having representative reflectors (location,
shape, size, etc.) of the damage likely to occur and a thickness range covering the expected range of the
test object. Material and temperature should be equivalent to the test object.
D.3.3 Probes
Probe selection depends on the test object geometry, material thickness, surface condition and coating
condition.
When the test object is curved, consideration should be given to the selection of probe size.
Frequency and aperture should be selected in accordance with the test object geometry, thickness and
type of corrosion to detect.

The recommended FMC/TFM imaging paths to use in accordance with the corrosion location are given
in Table D.2.
Table D.2 — Imaging paths for detection of corrosion

With side scanning With top scanning
Corrosion
internal surface imperfection internal surface imperfection surface breaking imperfection
Testing of Direct imaging path recom- Direct imaging path recom-
base mate- LL or TT mended (LL). mended (LL).
rial Direct contact or 0° wedge. Direct contact or 0° wedge.
LL or TT imaging path recom-
Corrosion mended. Direct imaging path recom- LL-LL or TT-TT imaging path
in weld Wedge angle should not ex- mendeda recommendeda
ceed 30°.
a The use of this imaging path is limited to very specific cases when good surface conditions are met, allowing use of the
ATFM technique.

Figure D.6 shows an FMC/TFM image obtained on a shallow wide corrosion. The main advantage to
apply FMC/TFM technique in that situation is in determining the corrosion profile in its whole extent.
The connected angle values with the back wall of the test object can be determined accurately.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Figure D.6 — FMC/TFM image on a shallow wide internal corrosion
D.4 SCC testing

D.4.1 General
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is by nature an in-service degradation mechanism that takes place over
time and in specific service conditions (materials, fluid content, temperature, loads). However, once
initiated, it can rapidly lead to catastrophic failure, as evidenced throughout industry in many common
engineering materials, including carbon steel, stainless steels and duplex steels. Hence, the ability to
detect the multifaceted profile of SCC damage, possibly as small as 1 mm in through-wall height, to
be able to characterize its morphology and to accurately size the through-wall extent is critical for
analysing the threat to integrity of the component while in service.
Examples of different size cracking in stainless steel cladding are given below.
a) SCC in cladding applied metallurgically is shown in Figure D.7. Measured through-wall sizes are as
follows: 0,12 mm (left), 0,45 mm (middle) and 3,13 mm (right);
b) SCC in cladding applied by weld overlay to carbon steel pipe work to protect it from corrosion is
shown in Figure D.8. Measured through-wall size is approximately 1 mm. The microstructure has
been etched to reveal the austenitic structure.
Figure D.7 — SCC damage in metallurgically applied austenitic cladding

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Figure D.8 — Micrographs of a SCC in stainless steel weld overlay cladding
D.4.2.1 Scanning surfaces and geometry
The scanning surface roughness should not exceed 6,5 µm.
D.4.2.2 Calibration
The ROI should be set over the part of the component where SCC is likely to occur. Nominally, this is a
surface exposed to corrosive fluids and the cracking that develops is open to the surface.
D.4.2.3 Reference levels
Ideally, exemplar damage in a representative component should be used as a reference. This leads
to the best possible outcomes during testing. The use of reference specimens with either artificial
targets (such as EDM notches) or actual damage is particularly mandated when SCC takes place in an
anisotropic, heterogeneous material, such as weld overlay cladding.
D.4.2.4 Sensitivity
The detection of SCC is nominally through the corner-trap effect, which is represented by the LL-L or
TT-T imaging paths presented in Table D.3. For the purposes of detection in isotropic or homogeneous
materials, sensitivity can be set to 6 dB greater than the corner from a reference notch or crack.
Acceptance levels need to be determined by project criteria. If sizing by detection of diffracted signals
from the cracks is sought, then sensitivity should be set to at least 14 dB greater than the corner from
a reference notch or crack. Optimization of the sensitivity level for diffraction-based sizing is likely
required using reference specimens or using limited destructive validation during the testing campaign.
D.4.3 Probes
SCC can be small and can need to be detected while it is less than 1 mm in through-wall size, depending
on a structural integrity analysis. Arrays with a frequency of 10 MHz with a minimum of 32 elements
are recommended. In general, the frequency shall be increased as far as possible but this depends

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

on many factors, such as the thickness of the component, attenuation of different regions within the
component (e.g. cladding and austenitic welding) and capabilities of the ultrasonic instrumentation.

The recommended FMC/TFM imaging paths to use are given in Table D.3.
Table D.3 — Imaging paths for detection of SCC

Recommended imaging path with Recommended imaging path with top
SCC damage
side scanning scanning
Testing of base metal or

welds can be done in both
top and side scanning con-
figuration
LL-L or TT-T imaging path recommended. Direct imaging path recommended (LL).
Direct contact or 0° wedge.
NOTE Side scanning is typically used for detection by corner-trap effect; both side scanning and top scanning is used for
sizing SCC by diffraction signals.
D.4.5 Example images

Figure D.9 and Figure D.10 show the detection of SCC in weld overlay cladding in stainless steel, by the
side scanning and top scanning configurations, respectively.
The partially deposited shape of the cladding surface geometry can clearly be seen (the geometry of
the cladding surface is shown at the top relative to the position of the probe and at the bottom with the
imaged data).

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Key
1 array
2 wedge
3 cladding surface
4 test surface
5 disbonding
6 SCC indication in the TFM image
Figure D.9 — Detection of disbond and SCC in a plate
a) Single tip b) Two branches
Figure D.10 — Detection of SCC cracks using the FMC/TFM technique (top scanning)
Figure D.11 shows metallographic cross-sections of the cracks as found in the plates on which the data
of Figure D.10 was collected.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

a) Single-branch SCC crack b) Double branched SCC crack
Figure D.11 — Example of SCC cracks
Figure D.12 shows a dye penetrant image where small SCC (<0.2 mm through-wall size) were found in a
stainless-steel parent plate (plate thickness was 13 mm).
Figure D12 — Dye penetrant testing showing a field of very small SCC
Figure D.13 shows FMC/TFM images of this cracking using the TT-T as applied in accordance with
Table D.3:
a) shows the data from the cracks where it is not possible to measure any through-wall dimensions
confidently;
b) shows the setup of the probe, wedge, component and the region of interest corresponding to a).

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

a) Through wall dimension not measurable b) Probe setup, wedge, component and ROI
Figure D13 — FMC/TFM image of the crack field using the TT-T imaging path
D.5 Testing of casting and forging

D.5.1 General
This clause illustrates the application of FMC/TFM for inspection of castings and forgings, and the
imaging of point, complex-shaped, planar and volumetric discontinuities within the component.
This clause assumes that the components have received a grain-refining heat treatment.
The position of the discontinuities in forged and casting parts is often in the far field of the probe. The
focusing technique can be used to improve the resolution but the focus distance is limited to within the
near-field length for PAUT and for FMC/TFM. However, FMC/TFM can be used with the region of interest
(ROI) placed over the entire area of interest. Figure D.14 shows that the FMC/TFM image is able to
resolve discontinuities close to and far from the probe, whereas the PAUT sector scan performs poorly.
Here, the sector scan image is from a 2 MHz, 16 elements, 24 mm diameter phased array probe, and the
probe is fixed at the centre of the block. The height, h, of the block is 345 mm and its width, w, is 170 mm.
The TFM image is from a 5 MHz, 64 elements, 2 mm pitch, 16 mm elevation phased array probe, and the
probe is fixed at the centre of the block. Compared with the sector scan image, the TFM technique can
get high resolution at all the area of ROI.
In casting parts application, the through-wall thickness and the dimensions of the discontinuities are
important for accurate assessment. The discontinuities can be displayed in the FMC/TFM images with
good resolution, which improves the characterization and sizing of discontinuities.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Key
h height
w width
Figure D.14 — Resolution comparison of FMC/TFM and PAUT sector scan

Casting and forged parts inspection is governed by ISO 4992-1, ISO 4992-2 and EN 10228-3,
respectively. Surface roughness for ultrasonic inspection should meet the requirement as stipulated
in these standards. If the performance of the FMC/TFM method can be shown to meet the related code
requirements, it can be used as a complementary approach for casting and forged parts inspection.
The FMC/TFM ROI is limited by the total grid points that can be used by the instrument. This limits the
depth of the casting/forging that can be inspected with good image resolution, which can therefore be
variable depending on the instrument used. Typically, the ROI can be 50 mm in width and 400 mm in
depth, with sampling rate set to 50 MHz and PRF to 2 kHz.
As the sound attenuation in castings can be high, the sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio are limited by
thickness. The maximum thickness for which TCG can be used to compensate successfully is typically
about 260 mm with a 64-elements probe at a frequency of 1 MHz, 2 mm pitch and 16 mm elevation.
Figure D.15 is the FMC/TFM image for an 85 mm thick casting, showing several back-wall reflections.
TCG can be used to set amplitudes of three back walls only. It is possible for the fourth back wall not to
be included due to a lack of gain available in the instrument. In casting parts, the sensitivity often needs
to be set by allowing the noise to rise to an acceptable level.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Figure D.15 — Multiple back-wall reflections showing TCG compensation
D.5.3 Probes
For casting parts application, the recommended frequency of the probes is from 1 MHz to 5 MHz. For
thicknesses less than 50 mm, the probe frequency can be up to 5 MHz and for parts of thickness more
than 50 mm, the probe frequency can need to be less than 3 MHz. The number of elements in the probes
should be 32 or 64. Probes with more elements give better resolution. For forged parts application, the
recommended frequency of the probes is from 2 MHz to 5 MHz, and the elements in the probe should be
32 or more.

The recommended FMC/TFM imaging path to be used for casting and forged parts application is shown
in Table D.4.
Table D.4 — imaging path for casting and forged parts.

Castings and forged parts With top scanning
Inspection of castings and forged parts can Direct imaging path recommended (LL).
be done by top scanning configuration. Direct contact or 0° wedge.

The gas porosity in the casting part shown in Figure D.16 was tested with FMC/TFM using different
probes to compare the image resolution of the defect. The results show that Figure D.16 c) gives the
best measurement resolution. Figure D.16 d) has poor signal-to-noise ratio and low sensitivity for the
gas porosity. Figure D.16 e) shows good sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio but has poor resolution
for measurement. Figure D.16 b) shows good signal-to-noise ratio and measurement resolution but has
lower sensitivity. Figure D.17 shows the gas porosity with PAUT sector scan using a 16-element probe
with a frequency of 2 MHz. The measurement resolution of the PAUT images is not as good as the image
shown in Figure D.16 c) for FMC/TFM.

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

b) 64-element c) 64-element d) 64-element e) 16-element

probe, 1 MHz, probe, 2,5 MHz, probe, 5 MHz, probe, 2,5 MHz,
a)
2 mm pitch and 1,5 mm pitch and 1,5 mm pitch and 1,5 mm pitch and
16 mm elevation 10 mm elevation 10 mm elevation 13 mm elevation
Figure D.16 — Gas porosities FMC/TFM images.
Figure D.17 — PAUT sector scan image of the gas porosities in Figure D.16

BS ISO 23865:2021
ISO 23865:2021(E)

Bibliography
[1] ISO 4992-1, Steel castings — Ultrasonic testing — Part 1: Steel castings for general purposes
[2] ISO 4992-2, Steel castings — Ultrasonic testing — Part 2: Steel castings for highly stressed
components
[3] ISO 13588, Non-destructive testing of welds — Ultrasonic testing — Use of automated phased array
technology
[4] ISO 16809, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic thickness measurement
[5] ISO 18563-3, Non-destructive testing — Characterization and verification of ultrasonic phased
array equipment — Part 3: Combined systems
[6] ISO 19675, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — Specification for a calibration block for
phased array testing (PAUT)
[7] ISO 23864, Non-destructive testing of welds — Ultrasonic testing — Use of automated total focusing
technique (TFM) and related technologies
[8] EN 10228-3, Non-destructive testing of steel forgings —Part 3: Ultrasonic testing of ferritic or
martensitic steel forging
[9] EN 17290, Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — Examination for loss of thickness due to
erosion and/or corrosion using the TOFD technique
[10] API RP 941, Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures
[11] https://www. nace.org/resources/general-resources/corrosion-basics
[12] High Temperature Hydrogen Attack – New NDE advanced capabilities – Development and
feedback – Charles Le Nevé et al. - Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference - July 14-19, 2019,
San Antonio, TX, USA

This page deliberately left blank
NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW
British Standards Institution (BSI)

BSI is the national body responsible for preparing British Standards and other
standards-related publications, information and services.
BSI is incorporated by Royal Charter. British Standards and other standardization
products are published by BSI Standards Limited.
About us Reproducing extracts

We bring together business, industry, government, consumers, innovators For permission to reproduce content from BSI publications contact the BSI
and others to shape their combined experience and expertise into standards Copyright and Licensing team.
-based solutions.
The knowledge embodied in our standards has been carefully assembled in Subscriptions
a dependable format and refined through our open consultation process. Our range of subscription services are designed to make using standards
Organizations of all sizes and across all sectors choose standards to help easier for you. For further information on our subscription products go to bsigroup.
them achieve their goals. com/subscriptions.
With British Standards Online (BSOL) you’ll have instant access to over 55,000
Information on standards British and adopted European and international standards from your desktop.
We can provide you with the knowledge that your organization needs It’s available 24/7 and is refreshed daily so you’ll always be up to date.
to succeed. Find out more about British Standards by visiting our website at You can keep in touch with standards developments and receive substantial
bsigroup.com/standards or contacting our Customer Services team or discounts on the purchase price of standards, both in single copy and subscription
Knowledge Centre. format, by becoming a BSI Subscribing Member.
Buying standards PLUS is an updating service exclusive to BSI Subscribing Members. You will
automatically receive the latest hard copy of your standards when they’re
You can buy and download PDF versions of BSI publications, including British and revised or replaced.
adopted European and international standards, through our website at bsigroup.
com/shop, where hard copies can also be purchased. To find out more about becoming a BSI Subscribing Member and the benefits
of membership, please visit bsigroup.com/shop.
If you need international and foreign standards from other Standards Development
Organizations, hard copies can be ordered from our Customer Services team. With a Multi-User Network Licence (MUNL) you are able to host standards
publications on your intranet. Licences can cover as few or as many users as you
Copyright in BSI publications wish. With updates supplied as soon as they’re available, you can be sure your
documentation is current. For further information, email [email protected].
All the content in BSI publications, including British Standards, is the property
of and copyrighted by BSI or some person or entity that owns copyright in the Revisions
information used (such as the international standardization bodies) and has
formally licensed such information to BSI for commercial publication and use. Our British Standards and other publications are updated by amendment or revision.
Save for the provisions below, you may not transfer, share or disseminate any We continually improve the quality of our products and services to benefit your
portion of the standard to any other person. You may not adapt, distribute, business. If you find an inaccuracy or ambiguity within a British Standard or other
commercially exploit or publicly display the standard or any portion thereof in any BSI publication please inform the Knowledge Centre.
manner whatsoever without BSI’s prior written consent.
Useful Contacts
Storing and using standards Customer Services
Standards purchased in soft copy format: Tel: +44 345 086 9001
• A British Standard purchased in soft copy format is licensed to a sole named Email: [email protected]
user for personal or internal company use only.
Subscriptions
• The standard may be stored on more than one device provided that it is Tel: +44 345 086 9001
accessible by the sole named user only and that only one copy is accessed at Email: [email protected]
any one time.
• A single paper copy may be printed for personal or internal company use only. Knowledge Centre
Tel: +44 20 8996 7004
Standards purchased in hard copy format: Email: [email protected]
• A British Standard purchased in hard copy format is for personal or internal
company use only. Copyright & Licensing
Tel: +44 20 8996 7070
• It may not be further reproduced – in any format – to create an additional copy.
This includes scanning of the document. Email: [email protected]
If you need more than one copy of the document, or if you wish to share the BSI Group Headquarters
document on an internal network, you can save money by choosing a subscription
product (see ‘Subscriptions’). 389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL UK
This page deliberately left blank

BS Iso 23865-2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BS Iso 23865-2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BS Iso 23865-2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose and scope of the British Standard?

What is the purpose and scope of the British Standard?

What are the main principles of the ultrasonic testing technique described in the standard?

What are the main principles of the ultrasonic testing technique described in the standard?

BS

BSI Standards Publication

Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing —

Amendments/corrigenda issued since publication

Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT

ii ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ iii

iv ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — General

3 Terms and definitions

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 1

4 Principle of the technique

Table 1 — - Description of the imaging paths

2 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

L-L transmitter path direct, receiver path

TT-TT transmitter path indirect, receiver

4.2 Comparison between FMC/TFM and PAUT

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 3

5 Requirements for surface condition and couplant

4 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

6 Information required prior to testing

6.2 Items to define prior to procedure development

7 Requirements for test personnel

8 Requirements for test equipment

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 5

6 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

8.4 Scanning mechanisms

8.5 Sampling frequency

8.6 Data processing

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 7

8.7 Evaluation of TFM indications

9 Benefits of various imaging paths

Table 3 — Advantages of different imaging paths

Discontinuities with (near) vertical

8 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

Discontinuities with (near) horizontal

Discontinuities with (near) horizontal

Discontinuities with (near) horizontal

10 Preparation for testing

10.2 System checking

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 9

10.3 Sensitivity correction

Figure 2 — Illustration of probe movement over SDHs for sensitivity correction

Table 4 — Number of SDH to use in accordance with ROI height

10 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

10.4 Sensitivity setting

10.5 Grid verification

10.6 Preparation of scanning surfaces

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved ﻿ 11

13 Interpretation and analysis of TFM images

12 ﻿ © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

b) identify relevant TFM indications;

13.2 Assessing the quality of TFM images

13.3 Identification of relevant TFM indications

ii © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved iii

iv © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 1

2 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 3

4 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 5

6 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 7

8 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 9

10 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 11

12 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 13

14 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 15

16 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 17

18 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 19

20 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 21

22 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 23

24 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 25

26 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 27

28 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 29

30 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved