Ex. 1.6 Rules of Inference

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

9.

For each of these collections of premises, what relevant conclusion or


conclusions can be drawn? Explain the rules of inference used to obtain each
conclusion from the premises.

a) “If I take the day off, it either rains or snows.” “I took Tuesday off or I took
Thursday off.” “It was sunny on Tuesday.” “It did not snow on Thursday.”

Sol.

i. If I take the day off, it either rains or snows premise

ii. It did not rain or snow on Tuesday it was sunny on Tuesday,

iii. I did not take Tuesday off. modus tollens on the universal
instantiation

iv. I took Tuesday off or I took Thursday off. premise

v. ⇒ I took Thursday off. disjunctive syllogism on (iii & iv)

vi. ⇒ it rained or snowed on Thursday. modus ponens on (i & vi)

vii. It did not snow on Thursday premise

viii. ⇒ it rained on Thursday. disjunctive syllogism on (vi & vii)

b) “If I eat spicy foods, then I have strange dreams.”

“I have strange dreams if there is thunder while I sleep.”

“I did not have strange dreams.”

Sol.

i. “If I eat spicy foods, then I have strange dreams.” premise

ii. “I did not have strange dreams.” premise

iii. I did not eat spicy food. modus tollens on (i & ii)

iv. “I have strange dreams if there is thunder while I sleep.” premise

v. it did not thunder. modus tollens on (ii & iv)


vi. I did not eat spicy food and it did not thunder." conjunction on (iii & v)

c) “I am either clever or lucky.” “I am not lucky.” “If I

am lucky, then I will win the lottery.”

Sol.

i. I am either clever or lucky. premise

ii. I am not lucky. premise

iii. I am clever. disjunctive syllogism on (i & ii)

iv. If I am lucky, then I will win the lottery. premise

v. We cannot draw any result from (ii & iv).

d) “Every computer science major has a personal computer.” “Ralph does not
have a personal computer.”

“Ann has a personal computer.”

Sol.

i. Every computer science major has a personal computer. premise

ii. Ralph does not have a personal computer. premise

iii. Ralph is not a CS major. universal instantiation on (i & ii)

iv. Ann has a personal computer.

v. We cannot draw any result about Ann, from (i & iv).


e) “What is good for corporations is good for the United States.” “What is good
for the United States is good for you.” “What is good for corporations is for you
to buy lots of stuff.”

Sol.

i. If x is good for corporations, x is good for the United States. premise

ii. If x is good for the United States, x is good for you. premise

iii. Take x as" for you to buy lots of stuff". universal instantiation

iv. It is good for corporations if you buy lots of stuff. premise

v. If you buy lots of stuff, is good for the United States. Hypothetical
syllogism on (iv & i)

vi. If you buy lots of stuff, it is good for you. Hypothetical syllogism on (v &
ii)

vii. To buy lots of stuff is good for the you and United States. Conjunction
on (v & vii).

f) “All rodents gnaw their food.” “Mice are rodents.”

“Rabbits do not gnaw their food.” “Bats are not rodents.”

Sol.

i.  x, if x is a rodent, then x gnaws its food. premise

ii. x being a mouse, a rabbit, and a bat. universal instantiation

iii. mice gnaw their food; modus ponens on (i and ii)

iv. Rabbits do not gnaw their food. premise

v. rabbits are not rodents modus tollens on (i and ii

vi. Bats are not rodents. premise

vii. We can conclude nothing about bats from (i & vi).

You might also like