This document discusses deductive validity and inductive strength in arguments. It defines a deductively valid argument as one where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises if they are true. A sound deductive argument is both valid and has true premises. An inductively strong argument is one where the conclusion is probable if the premises are true, but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. A cogent inductive argument is both strong and has true premises. The document provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments to determine their validity, soundness, strength or cogency.
This document discusses deductive validity and inductive strength in arguments. It defines a deductively valid argument as one where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises if they are true. A sound deductive argument is both valid and has true premises. An inductively strong argument is one where the conclusion is probable if the premises are true, but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. A cogent inductive argument is both strong and has true premises. The document provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments to determine their validity, soundness, strength or cogency.
This document discusses deductive validity and inductive strength in arguments. It defines a deductively valid argument as one where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises if they are true. A sound deductive argument is both valid and has true premises. An inductively strong argument is one where the conclusion is probable if the premises are true, but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. A cogent inductive argument is both strong and has true premises. The document provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments to determine their validity, soundness, strength or cogency.
This document discusses deductive validity and inductive strength in arguments. It defines a deductively valid argument as one where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises if they are true. A sound deductive argument is both valid and has true premises. An inductively strong argument is one where the conclusion is probable if the premises are true, but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. A cogent inductive argument is both strong and has true premises. The document provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments to determine their validity, soundness, strength or cogency.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
At a glance
Powered by AI
The passage discusses the differences between deductive and inductive arguments and provides criteria for evaluating the validity of deductive arguments and the strength of inductive arguments.
A deductive argument aims to provide logically conclusive grounds for the truth of the conclusion, while an inductive argument aims to provide probable but not logically conclusive grounds. A valid deductive argument must have a true conclusion if the premises are true, while a strong inductive argument makes the conclusion likely if the premises are true.
To determine if a deductive argument is valid, one must ask if the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. If yes, the argument is valid. If no, the argument is invalid.
WEEK 4
DEDUCTIVE VALIDITY – INDUCTIVE STRENGTH
I. DEDUCTIVE VALIDITY A logically reliable deductive argument is one in which the conclusion really does follow necessarily from the premises. In logic, a logically reliable deductive argument is called a valid deductive argument. A valid argument is an argument in which these conditions apply: i. If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. ii. The conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. iii. The premises provide logically conclusive grounds for the truth of the conclusion. iv. It is logically inconsistent to assert all the premises as true and deny the conclusion. It is not necessary to know whether an argument’s premises or conclusion are true to know whether the argument is valid. Key question: If the argument’s premises were true, would the conclusion also have to be true? o If the answer is yes, the argument is valid. o If the answer is no, the argument is invalid. Deductive arguments that are both valid and have all true premises are called sound deductive arguments. Deductive arguments that either are invalid or have at least one false premise, or both, are called unsound deductive arguments.
II. INDUCTIVE STRENGTH Inductive arguments can be well reasoned or poorly reasoned. A well-reasoned inductive argument is called a strong inductive argument. A strong inductive argument is an argument in which the following conditions apply: i. If the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true. ii. The premises provide probable, but not logically conclusive grounds for the truth of the conclusion. iii. The premises, if true, make the conclusion likely. Like deductively valid arguments, inductively strong arguments can have various combinations of truth or falsity in the premises and conclusion. Whether an inductive argument is strong or weak generally does not depend on the actual truth or falsity of the premises and the conclusion. Rather, it depends on whether the conclusion would probably true if the premises were true. If an argument both is inductively strong and has all true premises, it is said to be a cogent argument. If an inductive argument either is weak or has at least one false premise, it is an uncogent argument.
Exercise 1: The following arguments are deductive. Determine whether the arguments are valid or invalid. Explain your answer in each case. 1. If Flipper is a dolphin, then Flipper is a mammal. Flipper is a dolphin. So, Flipper is a mammal. 2. If anything is a trout, then it’s a fish. A dolphin is not a fish. Therefore, a dolphin is not a trout. 3. If we’re at the North Pole, then we’re on Earth. We are on Earth. Therefore, we’re at the North Pole. 4. If Bigfoot is human, then Bigfoot has a heart. Bigfoot is not human. So, Bigfoot doesn’t have a heart. 5. Some people like ice cream. Some people like cake. So, some people who like ice cream must also like cake. 6. Simba is a lion. Necessarily, therefore, Simba must have four legs. 7. Your mother can’t be a professional race car driver. Only men are professional race car drivers, and your mother, obviously, is not a man. 8. Science student: Science is often defined as the organized arrangement of known facts. But that cannot be the correct definition because a phone book is an organized arrangement of facts, and a phone book is not science. 9. Bill: I guess some of the seniors were late to practice this morning. Diane: How do you know? Bill: Because the coach said that anyone late to practice this morning would have to do wind sprints, and I just saw some of the seniors doing wind sprints. That’ll teach them. 10. Frank: I’m going to bring my cell phone with me when I take the logic test tomorrow. Whenever I don’t know the answer, I’ll just call my roommate, Ted. He aced Logic last semester. Maria: Are you crazy? Professor Hardy will never allow you to cheat like that! Frank: Sure he will. I distinctly heard him say, “No notes or books are allowed during the test,” and phone calls, my friend, qualify as neither. It’s simple logic: No notes or books may be used during the test; phone calls aren’t notes or books; so, they are allowed. Maria: Clearly, you’re going to need all the help you can get. Exercise 2: The following arguments are deductive. Determine whether the arguments are sound or unsound. Explain your answer in each case. 1. All mosquitoes are insects. All insects are animals. So, all mosquitoes are animals. 2. Either dogs are cats, or dogs are fish. Dogs are not fish. So, dogs are cats. 3. If Rome is in Italy, then Rome is in Europe. Rome is in Italy. So, Rome is in Europe. 4. If Bill Gates is a billionaire, then he’s rich. Bill Gates is rich. So, he’s a billionaire. 5. No cars a trucks. A Mazda Miata is a car. So, a Mazda Miata is not a truck. 6. China has a larger population than Germany. Germany has a larger population than Canada. So, China has a larger population than Canada. 7. If Barack Obama plays for the New York Yankees, then he is a professional baseball player. Barack Obama does not play for the New York Yankees. So, Barak Obama is not a professional baseball player. 8. Some apples are red. Some apples are delicious. So some apples are red and delicious. 9. Los Angeles is west of Chicago. Hence, New York City is east of Chicago because New York City is east of Los Angeles. 10. Halloween (Oct.31) is always on a Friday. Therefore, the day after Halloween is always a Saturday. Exercise 3: The following arguments are inductive. Determine whether the arguments are cogent or uncogent: 1. It tends to be cold in Alaska in January. So, probably it will be cold in Alaska next January. 2. Cigarette smoking causes lung cancer. Therefore, if you have been a heavy cigarette smoker for many years, you will probably die of lung cancer. 3. The vast majority of American presidents have been tweeters. Therefore, the next U.S. president will probably be a tweeter. 4. In poker it’s OK to lie and deceive. Business is like poker. Therefore, in business it’s OK to lie and deceive. 5. Billions of men around the world shave daily. Therefore, somewhere in the world, someone must be shaving right now. 6. Shakespeare was English, and he was a great poet. Milton was English, and he was a great poet. Wordsworth was English, and he was a great poet. I guess most great poets were English. 7. Harvard University has been a leading American university for many years. Therefore, probably Harvard University will be a leading American university ten years from now. 8. Ninety percent of Americans jog daily. Tom Cruise is an American. So, Tom Cruise probably jogs daily. 9. Very few people in this country are named Obadiah. Therefore, the next person I meet is unlikely to be named Obadiah. 10. Spinach is a green plant, and it is edible. Broccoli is a green plant, and it is edible. I suppose all green plants are edible. Exercise 4 Determine whether the following arguments are deductive or inductive. If the argument is deductive, determine whether it is valid or invalid. If the argument is inductive, determine whether it is strong or weak. Explain your answer in each case. 1. If Boston loses, Cleveland will make the playoffs. If Cleveland makes the playoffs, the first playoff game will be played in Seattle. Therefore, it Boston loses, the first playoff game will be played in Seattle. 2. All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. So, penguins can fly. 3. Most college students sleep late on Sunday mornings. Wes is a college student. So, Wes probably sleeps late on Sunday mornings. 4. Exercise is good for the vast majority of people. Therefore, it would be good for my ninety-five-year-old grandfather to run in next year’s Boston Marathon. 5. John’s home address is 47 Riverside Drive. It follows that he must live near a river. 6. It is totally dark in here, but I know that the only things in the drawer are socks, ten black, ten white. I had better take out eleven socks to be sure I get a matched pair. 7. According to the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, philosopher William James was born in New York City in 1842. So, William James was born in New York City in 1842. 8. If it rained, then the streets are wet. The streets are wet. So, it rained. 9. This bathwater is tepid. It follows that it is neither extremely hot nor extremely cold. 10. States were justified in suing tobacco companies to recover the health-care costs associated with smoking. Similarly, states would be justified in suing McDonald’s and Burger King to recover the health-care costs associated with eating fatty foods. 11. There are more than fifty students in this class. It must be the case, therefore, that at least one of them is a Capricorn. 12. In a recent Gallup poll, 72 percent of Americans said they favoured the death penalty. Therefore, approximately 72 percent of Americans do favor the death penalty. 13. On Monday I drank ten rum-and-Cokes, and the next morning I woke up with a headache. On Wednesday I drank eight gin-and-Cokes, and the next morning I woke up with a headache. On Friday I drank nine bourbon-and-Cokes, and the next morning I woke up with a headache. Obviously, to prevent further headaches, I must give up Coke. 14. Smedley ran 5 miles in 38 minutes. It follows that he must have run at least 1 mile in less than 8 minutes. 15. Some politicians are Democrats. Some Democrats are carpenters. So, some carpenters must be politicians. 16. Nearly all U.S. presidents were born before 1925. It stands to reason, therefore, that the next U.S. president will have been born before 1925. 17. The Empire State Building is taller than the Sears Tower. Therefore, because the Eiffel Tower is shorter than the Empire State Building, it follows that the Sears Tower is taller than the Eiffel Tower. 18. Do most Americans like rap music? Apparently not. In a random survey of then thousand nursing home patients around the country, fewer than 5 percent said they enjoyed listening to rap. 19. Richard Dawkins, the famous scientist, has said that the heavy elements like iron and zinc that compose human bodies were created billions of years ago in the interiors of long-extinct stars. Moreover, virtually all scientists agree with Dawkins on this point. Therefore, it is probably true that the heavy elements like iron and zinc that compose human bodies were created billions of years ago in the interiors of long-extinct stars. 20. Jerry was born on Easter Sunday. It necessarily follows, therefore, that his birthday always falls on a Sunday.
Arnold Hauser, Jonathan Harris-Social History of Art, Boxed Set - The Social History of Art - Rococo, Classicism and Romanticism. Vol. 3-Routledge (1999)