BCF 405 Financial Reporting - Module 2 PDF
BCF 405 Financial Reporting - Module 2 PDF
BCF 405 Financial Reporting - Module 2 PDF
Structure
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Need for Regulatory Framework
2.3 Overview of International Accounting Standards (IAS)
2.4 Development and Interpretation of International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS)
2.5 Legal Requirements of not for Profit
2.6 Public Sector and Single Entity
2.7 Summary
2.8 Check Your Progress
2.9 Questions and Exercises
2.10 Key Terms
2.11 Further Readings
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
Understand the Concept of Need for regulatory framework
Discuss the International Accounting Standards (IAS).
Explain the Legal requirements of not for profit.
2.1 Introduction
A regulatory framework for the preparation of financial statements is necessary for a
number of reasons:
To ensure that the needs of the users of financial statements are met with at least a
basic minimum of information.
To ensure that all the information provided in the relevant economic arena is both
comparable and consistent. Given the growth in multinational companies and global
investment this arena is an increasing international one.
To increase users' confidence in the financial reporting process.
To regulate the behaviour of companies and directors towards their investors.
Financial reporting standards on their own would not be sufficient to achieve these
aims. In addition there must be some legal and market-based regulation.
National regulatory frameworks for financial reporting.
There are many elements to the regulatory environment of accounting. A typical
regulatory structure includes:
National financial reporting standards
National law
Market regulations
Security exchange rules.
Notes
Contd…
Notes
Note: Wockhardt IP AG, Wockhardt Switzerland Holdings AG and Wockhardt USA Holdings
(Swiss) AG had been merged with Wockhardt EU Operations (Swiss) AG vide agreement dated
June 11, 2007 with effect from January 1, 2007. The said merger had been registered with
commercial Registry of Switzerland on June 18, 2007.
(c) Additional Clause 50: A new clause has been added as clause 50 which
requires companies to comply with accounting standards issued by the ICAI
from time to time.
(d) Amendment to Clause 41 of the Listing Agreement: This Amendment to
clause 41 is related with Quarterly unaudited financial results.
(i) Companies shall be required to furnish segments wise results with effect
from the quarters ending on or after September 30, 2001.
(ii) Companies shall be required to comply with the AS on Accounting for taxes
on Income” in respect of un-audited quarterly financial result with effect
from the quarters ending on or after 30th Sep. 2001.
(iii) Companies shall be required to have an option to publish consolidated
quarterly financial results.
Date Development
15 February 2007 Exposure Draft Proposed IFRS for Small and Medium-
sized Entities published
(Various translations were also subsequently
published)
Section
Preface
1. Small and Medium-sized Entities
2. Concepts and Pervasive Principles
3. Financial Statement Presentation
4. Statement of Financial Position
5. Statement of Comprehensive Income and Income Statement
Glossary
Derivation Table
Separate booklets
Basis for Conclusions
Illustrative Financial Statements and Presentation and Disclosure Checklist
Preface
The IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities is organised by topic, with each topic
presented in a separate section. All of the paragraphs in the standard have equal
authority.
The standard is appropriate for general purpose financial statements and other
financial reporting of all profit-oriented entities. General purpose financial
Agriculture: Notes
If the fair value of a class of biological asset is readily determinable without undue
cost or effort, use the fair value through profit or loss model.
If the fair value is not readily determinable, or is determinable only with undue cost
or effort, measure the biological assets at cost less and accumulated depreciation
and impairment.
At harvest, agricultural produce is being measured at fair value less estimated costs
to sell. Thereafter it is accounted for an inventory.
Notes The point of IFRS is to maintain stability and transparency throughout the financial
world. This allows businesses and individual investors to make educated financial
decisions, as they are able to see exactly what has been happening with a company in
which they wish to invest.
IFRS are standards in many parts of the world, including the European Union and
many countries in Asia and South America, but not in the United States. The Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in the process of deciding whether or not to adopt
the standards in America. Countries that benefit the most from the standards are those
that do a lot of international business and investing. Advocates suggest that a global
adoption of IFRS would save money on alternative comparison costs and individual
investigations, while also allowing information to flow more freely.
In the countries that have adopted IFRS, both companies and investors benefit from
using the system, since investors are more likely to put money into a company if the
company's business practices are transparent. Also, the cost of investments is usually
lower. Companies that do a lot of international business benefit the most from IFRS.
IFRS are sometimes confused with International Accounting Standards (IAS), which
are the older standards that IFRS replaced. IAS was issued from 1973 to 2000.
Likewise, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) replaced the
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) in 2001.
Notes Many non-profit groups want to be considered non-profits because it will help them
avoid federal or state taxes. Non-profits often receive tax exemptions from Section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which is why nonprofits are sometimes referred
to “501(c)(3)s.” State laws are typically stricter than federal laws when it concerns
non-profits, and each state has its own set of rules and regulations, though many states
do overlap.
State Laws
State laws have big consequences for any non-profits that don’t strictly follow the rules.
There are many lawyers who specifically work with non-profits, as the nomenclature can
be quite confusing and dense, especially for people who have never taken law classes.
A non-profit that operates in more than one state will need to pay attention to the laws
that affect its work in each jurisdiction.
Twenty-six states require that non-profits complete an audit so that they are able to
participate in fund-raising activities from year to year. According to the National Council
of Non-Profits, “thirty-nine states (including the District of Columbia) require charitable
non-profits to register with the state in order to fundraise in that state.” Over half of the
states require some form of audit every year, whether the group actively fundraises or
not. For example, Maine is particularly strict with licensing and requires renewals each
year.
Many of the audits that take place within a state for the government must be done
by an independent auditor, or someone who does not have stake in either the company
or the government.
To see more about your specific state, visit the National Council of Non-Profits
interactive page.
Political Non-Profits
Political non-profits have become some of the largest contributors to elections in the last
few decades. Some of these organizations include the often talked-about Super PACs,
which pool campaign contributions from members and donate them to campaigns for or
against particular candidates. These organizations, predominantly 501(c)(4)s and
501(c)(6)s, “do not have to disclose the sources of their funding–though a minority do
disclose some or all of their donors, by choice or in response to specific circumstances.”
The anonymity and large scale of these Super PACs have ruffled many feathers,
especially within smaller parties.
That may be why the IRS is considering a rule “to police political nonprofits to
include political parties and political action committees.” These groups are commonly
called “social welfare” groups and operate under those guises, but play by a completely
different set of rules.
“If it’s going to be a fair system, it needs to apply across the board,” IRS
Commissioner John Koskinen said when asked by POLITICO about the new rule. He
continued, if we have a set of definitions for 501(c)(4)s, what about everybody else?
Can they do more or less [political activity]? And for us as [an] administration, for ease
of administration, it makes sense to have this common definition.”
Non-Profit Spending
How much of what you give a foundation or non-profit actually goes to the cause
depends greatly on the specific organization. For most of these organizations, a good
chunk goes toward overhead costs like fundraising, employee salaries, and
management costs.
For instance, according to The Street, the Walker Cancer Institute “spent 96.4% of
its total funds on overhead in 2012. The nonprofit spent 91.1% of its money to raise
Non-Profit Controversies
These groups and organizations are not without controversy and problematic behavior.
Some of these controversies arose out of tax issues, while others came from the
actions of the group specifically.
In addition, the group has come under fire for allegedly aligning itself with the Judge
Rotenberg Center, which uses electric shock therapy.
2.7 Summary
In a broad sense a conceptual framework can be seen as an attempt to define the
nature and purpose of accounting. A conceptual framework must consider the
theoretical and conceptual issues surrounding financial reporting and form a coherent
and consistent foundation that will underpin the development of accounting standards. It
is not surprising that early writings on this subject were mainly from academics.
Conceptual frameworks can apply to many disciplines, but when specific ally related to
financial reporting, a conceptual framework can be seen as a statement of generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that form a frame of reference for the evaluation
of existing practices and the development of new ones. As the purpose of financial
reporting is to provide useful information as a basis for economic decision making, a
conceptual framework will form a theoretical basis for determining how transactions
should be measured (historical value or current value) and reported – i.e. how they are
presented or communicated to users.
Some accountants have questioned whether a conceptual framework is necessary
in order to produce reliable financial statements. Past history of standard setting bodies
throughout the world tells us it is. In the absence of a conceptual framework, accounting
standards were often produced that had serious defects – that is:
they were not consistent with each other particularly in the role of prudence versus
accruals/matching
they were also internally inconsistent and often the effect of the transaction on the
statement of financial position was considered more important than its effect on
income the statement standards were produced on a ‘fire fighting’ approach, often
reacting to a corporate scandal or failure, rather than being proactive in determining
best policy.
Some standard setting bodies were biased in their composition (i.e. not fairly
representative of all user groups) and this influenced the quality and direction of
standards
the same theoretical issues were revisited many times in successive standards – for
example, does a transaction give rise to an asset (research and development
expenditure) or liability (environmental provisions)?
It could be argued that the lack of a conceptual framework led to a proliferation of
‘rules-based’ accounting systems whose main objective is that the treatment of all
accounting transactions should be dealt with by detailed specific rules or
requirements. Such a system is very prescriptive and inflexible, but has the
attraction of financial statements being more comparable and consistent.