AGRICULTURAL COOPERATION, FINANCE AND

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

AGICULTURAL CREDIT

P. S. BADAL
Reader, Department of Agricultural Economics
Institute of Agricultural Sciences
Banaras Hindu University
Varanasi – 221 005
CONTENTS

1. Introduction
2. Sources of Agricultural Credit
A. Non-institutional Credit Agencies
B. Institutional Credit Agencies
3. Cooperative Credit System
3.1 Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies (PACS)
3.2 District Central Cooperative Banks (DCCBs)
3.3 State Cooperative Bank (SCB)
3.4 Primary Land Development Banks (PLDBs)
3.5 Central Land Development Bank (CLDBs)
3.6 Large-sized Adivasi Multi-purpose Cooperative Societies (LAMPS)
4. Regional Rural Banks
5. National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD)
6. Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC)
7. Problems in Agricultural Credit System
8. Issues in Rural Credit
Suggested Readings and References

1. Introduction

Capital accumulation plays a pivotal role in almost all the models of growth and development
because it raises the productive capacity of the sector where it takes place. The capital
accumulation depends on the rate of investment, which in turn depends on the rate of savings.
The financial institutions play a dominant role in mobilising savings and then channelising
those savings into productive economic activities. Therefore, role of financial institutions is
crucial in the development of any sector and agriculture is no exception to it. Rather, the
development of agriculture sector is more dependent on banking sector because 80 percent of
farmers are small and marginal, who are unable to save and invest due to their low levels of
income. Further, about 70 percent of the population of India lives in rural areas contributing
about 24.2 per cent to gross domestic product (GDP) and forms the largest consuming market
leading to income and employment generation through multiplier effects. Banking sector
helps in the monetization of the economy. Agriculture is the most crucial sector of the
country because the main policies of output growth, poverty alleviation, social justice and
equity are best served in this sector. Thus there is a need to increase the credit flow to
agriculture, raise productive capacity of land and enhance the potential of water resources as
well as its use efficiency for agricultural production.

When the country faced the problem of food shortages in the early sixties, agricultural public
policy aimed at increasing productivity and production of foodgrains to meet this challenge.
The cultivation of dwarf wheat and rice varieties which were highly responsive to purchased
inputs like fertilisers, agro-chemicals and irrigation required capital at the farm level.
Agricultural credit scenario was largely dominated by private informal sources of credit i.e.
professional money lenders and traders. The participation of commercial banks was
negligible in agricultural loans. Farmers’ level of income was low and they were hesitant to
use modern technology. Therefore, agricultural credit policy aimed at increasing the flow of
institutional credit at reasonable rates of interest to agriculture sector. The cooperative credit
structure was strengthened by reorganising and merging weak societies with strong societies.
The number of village level co-operative societies also increased. Presently, more than
92,000 primary agricultural cooperative credit societies are working in villages. Commercial
banks (CBs) were nationalized in 1969 and mandated to increase their geographical and
functional presence in the rural areas. Consequently, the number of rural branches of CBs
increased from just 1833 in 1969 to 32,121 in 2004. Another credit institution lending
exclusively to the weaker sectors of the rural areas, known as Regional Rural Banks (RRBs),
was set up in 1975. To meet the challenges of institutional credit and refinance needs, an apex
institution called National Bank for Agricultural and rural Development (NABARD) was set
up in 1982. In order to increase the flow of credit new approaches such as Service Area
approach, Micro-finance and Kisan Credit Cards were also initiated. There is now a very
strong network of rural and semi-urban branches catering to requirements of agriculture
sector and rural areas. The growth of agricultural advances has also been significant over the
years. The direct agricultural advances has increased form Rs. 4,361 crores in 1980-81 to Rs.
17,762 crores in 2000-01 at an annual growth rate of 6.6 per cent at 1990-91 prices. If we
compare the growth of agricultural credit in real terms since 1980s, it was noted that growth
was very high in the period of 1980-81 through 1989-90, when Green Revolution technology
was in full bloom. The new technology was widely adopted and capital investments on
developing irrigation structures, farm mechanization and land reclamation were made to
realise the full potential of new high yielding technology. However, during the period of
deceleration in growth of agricultural productivity, the growth of institutional credit also
slowed down significantly from around 10.6 per cent in the earlier period (1980-81 through
1989-90) to 6.8 per cent in the later period (1989-90 through 2000-01). A target of 18 percent
of net bank credit has been set for advancing credit to agriculture by scheduled commercial
banks (SCBs). Despite significant growth in agricultural advances, only 5 SCBs have
achieved this target showing that still greater effort for increasing agricultural credit is
required from SCBs.

2. Sources of Agricultural Credit

The sources of agricultural finance are broadly classified into two categories: (A) Non-
institutional Credit Agencies or informal sources, and (B) Institutional Credit Agencies or
Formal Sources.

1
A. Non-institutional Credit Agencies

i) Traders and Commission Agents: Traders and commission agents advance loans to
agriculturists for productive purposes against their crop without completing legal formalities.
It often becomes obligatory for farmers to buy inputs and sell output through them. They
charge a very heavy rate of interest on the loan and a commission on all the sales and
purchases, making it exploitative in nature. It an important source of finance in case of cash
crops like cotton, tobacco and groundnut.

ii) Landlords: Mostly small farmers and tenants depend on landlords for meeting their
production and day to day financial requirements.

iii) Money lenders: Despite rapid development in rural branches of different institutional
credit agencies, village money lenders still dominate the scene. Money lenders are of two
types- agriculturist money lenders who combine their money lending job with farming and
professional money lenders whose sole job is money lending. A number of reasons have been
attributed for the popularity of moneylenders such as: (a) they meet demand for productive as
well as unproductive requirement; (b) they are easily approachable at odd hours; and (c) they
require very low paper work and advances are given against promissory notes or land. Money
lenders charge a very high rate of interest as they take advantage of the urgency of the
situation. Over the years a need for regulation of money lending has been felt. But lack of
institutional credit access to certain sections and areas had facilitated unhindered operation of
money lending. Cooperative credit and self-help groups can play a major role in control of
money lending.

B. Institutional Credit Agencies

i) Government: These are both short term as well as long-term loans. These loans are
popularly known as “Taccavi loans” which are generally advanced in times of natural
calamities. The rate of interest is low. But it is not a major source of agricultural finance.

ii) Cooperative Credit Societies: The history of cooperative movement in India dates back
to 1904 when first Cooperative Credit Societies Act was passed by the Government. The
scope of the Act was restricted to establishment of primary credit societies and non-credit
societies were left out of its purview. The shortcomings of the Act were rectified through
passing another Act called Cooperative Societies Act 1912. The Act gave provision for
registration of all types of Cooperative Societies. This made the emergence of rural
cooperatives both in the credit and noncredit areas, though with uneven spatial growth. In
subsequent years a number of Committees were appointed and recommendations
implemented to improve the functioning of the cooperatives.

Soon after the independence, the Government of India following the recommendations of All
India Rural Credit Survey Committee (1951) felt that cooperatives were the only alternative
to promote agricultural credit and development of rural areas. Accordingly, cooperatives
received substantial help in the provision of credit from Reserve Bank of India as a part of
loan policy and large scale assistance from Central and State Governments for their
development and strengthening. Many schemes involving subsidies and concessions for the
weaker sections were routed through cooperatives. As a result cooperative institutions

2
registered a remarkable growth in the post-independence India. A detailed structure of the
cooperative credit system has been discussed in Section 3.

iii) Commercial Banks:

Previously commercial banks (CBs) were confined only to urban areas serving mainly to
trade, commerce and industry. Their role in rural credit was meagre i.e., 0.9 per cent in 1951-
52 and 0.7 per cent in 1961-61. The insignificant participation of CBs in rural lending was
explained by the risky nature of agriculture due to its heavy dependence on monsoon,
unorganized nature and subsistence approach. A major change took place in the form of
nationalisation of CBs in 1969 and CBs were made to play an active role in agricultural
credit. At present, they are the largest source of institutional credit to agriculture.

Box 1: Lead Bank Scheme

The National Credit Council (NCC) had appointed a Study Group in 1969 under the
Chairmanship of Prof. D. R. Gadgil to suggest an appropriate organizational framework for
effective implementation of social objectives. The Study Group recommended an ‘Area
Approach’ for the development of financial structure through intensive efforts. The same
year, RBI appointed Nariman Committee to study this recommendation. The Committee
endorsed the views of the Study Group on ‘Area Approach’ and recommended the
formulation of ‘Lead Bank Scheme’. The RBI accepted the recommendation and ‘Lead Bank
Scheme’ came into force from 1969. As per this scheme a particular district is allotted to a
specific bank which takes a lead role in identifying the potential areas for banking and
banking development and in expanding credit facilities in the district. Functions of Lead
Banks are:

(i) Surveying of potential areas for development of banking in the district

(ii) identifying business establishments which were hitherto dependent on non-

institutional agencies and financing them so as to enable them to raise their resources
and surpluses from the advances made by the bank.;

(iii) examining the marketing facilities available for disposal of agricultural and industrial
commodities and linking credit with marketing;

(iv) assisting other lending agencies;

3
(v) developing contracts and maintaining liaison with Government and other agencies;
and

(vi) preparing district credit plans much ahead of the season with the help of technical
committee.

The lead bank is not a monopolist in banking business in the district but acts as a consortium
leader for coordinating the efforts of all financial institutions operating in the district. By
June 1992, all the districts of the country were covered under this scheme.

iv) Regional Rural Banks (RRBs): RRBs were set up in those regions where availability of
institutional credit was found to be inadequate but potential for agricultural development was
very high. However, the main thrust of the RRBs is to provide loans to small and marginal
farmers, landless labourers and village artisans. These loans are advanced for productive
purposes. At present 196 RRBs are functioning in the country lending around Rs 9,000 crore
to rural people, particularly to weaker sections. Table 1 shows the relative share of different
agencies in institutional credit flow to agriculture:

Table 1: Share of different agencies in flow of institutional credit for agriculture

(Rs crores )
Institutions 1999- 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05*
2000
Cooperative Banks 18,363 20,801 23,604 24,296 26,959 24,471
Share (per cent) 40 39 38 34 31 28
Regional Rural 3,172 4,219 4,854 5,467 7,581 9,176
Banks
Share (per cent) 7 8 8 8 9 11
Commercial Banks 24,733 27,807 33,587 41,047 52,441 52,038
Share (per cent) 53 53 54 58 60 61
Total 46,268 52,827 62,045 70,810 86,981 85,686
Note : * upto Dec 2004
Source : Government of India (2005) Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, , Directorate of
Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture

v) Microfinancing: Microfinancing through Self Help Groups (SHG) has assumed

prominence in recent years. SHG is group of rural poor who volunteer to organise themselves
into a group for eradication of poverty of the members. They agree to save regularly and
convert their savings into a common fund known as the Group corpus. The members of the
group agree to use this common fund and such other funds that they may receive as a group
through a common management.

Generally, a self-help group consists of 10 to 20 persons. However, in difficult areas like

deserts, hills and areas with scattered and sparse population and in case of minor irrigation
and disabled persons, this number may range from 5-20. As soon as the SHG is formed and a

4
couple of group meetings are held, an SHG can open a Savings Bank account with the nearest
Commercial or Regional Rural Bank or a Cooperative Bank. This is essential to keep the
thrift and other earnings of the SHG safely and also to improve the transparency levels of
SHG's transactions. Opening of SB account, in fact, is the beginning of a relationship
between the bank and the SHG. The Reserve Bank of India has issued instructions to all
banks permitting them to open SB accounts in the name of registered or unregistered SHGs.

Box 2: Kisan Credit Card Scheme

In spite of various measures to rejuvenate farm credit, the flow of credit remained
quantitatively and qualitatively poor. The institutional sources of credit meet only 51 per cent
of the credit requirements of farm sector. The non-institutional sources were mainly reached
by farmers due to lack of collaterals, frequent needs, undue delays, complicated procedures
and malpractices adopted by institutional lending agencies. With a view to inquire into the
reasons for the problems of the farm credit and suggest measure for improving the delivering
system, RBI set up a one man Committee of Shri R. V. Gupta to in December 1997. The
Committee submitted its report in April 1998. It was against this background that RBI
directed all Public Sector Banks (PSBs), RRBs and cooperative banks to introduce “Kisan
Credit Card Scheme (KCCS)” on the lines of the model scheme formulated by NABARD and
in due course of time the KCCS was adopted by all the directed agencies.
The KCCS aims at adequate and timely support from banking system to the farmer for crop
production and ancillary activities. The credit limit (loan) is sanctioned in proportion to the
size of the owned land but some flexibility is provided for leased-in land in addition to owned
land. The borrowing limit is fixed on the basis of proposed cropping pattern. Most of the
banks are adhering to Scales of Finance (SOF) decided by the State Level Bankers
Committee (SLBC) but some banks have fixed their own SOF. The nature of credit extended
under KCCS is revolving cash credit i.e., it provides for any number of withdrawals and
repayments within the limit. This feature would provide flexibility and reduce the interest
burden upon KCCS beneficiary. Security and margin norms would be in conformity with the
guidelines issued by RBI and NABARD from time to time. With effect from 2001-2002, it
was made obligatory for the implementing agencies to operate the KCCS with an in-built
component of life-insurance for KCCS beneficiary. The KCCS as envisaged has substituted
all other existing institutional modes of short term credit delivery.

Status of KCCS in India

By July 2005, implementation of KCCS were taken up by 27 PSBs, 378 Cooperative Banks
and 196 RRBs throughout the country. The cooperative banks account for 65 percent of
KCCs issued and 63 per cent of the amount sanctioned. The Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and
RRBs together accounted for 35 per cent of the KCCs issued and 37 per cent of the loan
sanctioned.

5
By initially managing their own common fund for some time, SHG members not only take
care of the financing needs of each other, but develop their skills of financial management
and intermediation as well. Lending to members also enhances the knowledge of SHG
members in setting the interest rate and periodic loan installments, recovering the loan, etc.

The SHG- bank linkages programme has emerged as the major micro-finance programme in
the country. NABARD has played a major role in development of SHG-Bank linkages with
involvement of Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the process. There are three
models of SHG-bank linkages that have evolved over time:

Model I. SHGs formed and financed by banks: In this model, the bank itself takes up the
work of forming and nurturing the groups, opening their bank accounts and providing them
with bank loans after satisfying itself as to their maturity to absorb credit. In case the bank is
also the programme implementing agency.

Model II. SHGs formed by NGOs and formal organizations but directly financed by the
banks: In this model, groups are formed by NGOs (in most cases) or by government
agencies. The groups are nurtured and trained by the agencies. The bank then provides credit
directly to the SHGs after observing their operations and maturity to absorb credit. While the
bank provides loans to the groups directly, the facilitating agencies continue their interactions
with the SHGs. Most linkage experiences begin with this model, where NGOs play a major
role. The model has also been popular with and more acceptable to banks, since some of the
difficult functions of social dynamics are externalized. Around 75 percent of the total number
of SHGs are financed under this model.

Model III. SHGs financed by banks using NGOs and other agencies as financial
intermediaries: For various reasons, banks in some areas are not in a position even to finance
SHGs promoted and nurtured by other agencies. In such cases, the NGOs act as both
facilitators and microfinance intermediaries. First, they promote the groups, nurture and train
them and then they approach banks for bulk loans for onlending to SHGs.

While 563 districts in all the States/UTs have been covered under this programme, 560 banks
including 48 commercial banks, 196 RRBs and 316 cooperative banks along with 3024
NGOs are now associated with this initiative. The number of SHGs linked to the banks
aggregated 1,276,035 as on December 30, 2004. Cumulative disbursement of bank loan to
these SHGs stood at Rs. 5,038 crore as on the same date.

Box 3: Success Story of Kasturba Fisherwomen's Self Help Group

Bailur, a small village in Bhatkaltaluka, Uttara Kanada district in Karnataka state mainly
depends on rainfed paddy crop and fishing activities. Most fisher families are below the
poverty line.

Microfinance programme helped to alleviate poverty. The initiatives of the Mavalli-

Murdeshwar branch of the Varada Grameena Bank reformed the life style of the Kasturba
fisherwomen's self help group, which was formed in 1999. They started saving by

6
contributing Rs10 per day/per member and initiated internal lending from their savings for
marriage, consumption needs, medical purposes, education, and businesses other than fish
vending. Each member received financial assistance of Rs 25 000 - Rs10 000 in the form of
subsidy under SGSY and Rs15 000 as a loan from the bank. As a group they realized the
economic constraints of fish vending, particularly the lack of transport from harbour to
markets. They bought a minivan, fish crates and boxes. This resulted in an increase in income
and supply of quality fish to consumers.

Kasturba SHG achieved a turnover of Rs 20 Lakhs in 2002. All members attempted to

become literate.

3. Cooperative Credit System

Cooperative Credit Organisation

Short term and Medium term Long term (two- tier system)
loans (three- tier system)

State Co-operative Bank Central Land Development

(SCBs) Banks (at state level)

District Central Co-operative Primary Land Development

Banks (at district level) Bank (at Taluk level)

Primary Agricultural Co-

operative Credit Societies

3.1 Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies (PACS)

Following the ‘Raiffeisen Model’, PACS came to existence after the enactment of
Cooperative Credit Societies Act 1904. PACS functions on the basis of cooperative principles
of voluntary participation, democratic control, limited area of operation and limited liability.
These societies work at the village level and are meant for the farmers regarding provision of
requisite short term and medium term loans. Supply of agricultural inputs and other essential

7
commodities is also taken up by these societies. In addition to these PACS also helps in
formulation and implementation of agricultural development plans for the welfare of its
members. The PACS are associated with following functions:

(i) they borrow adequate and timely funds from DCCBs and help the members in financial
matters; (ii) they attract local savings in the form of share capital and deposits from the
villagers, thereby inculcating the habit of thrift; (iii) they supervise the end use of credit; (iv)
they make available fertilizers and insecticides etc. to the needy farmers; (v) they provide
machinery on hire basis to the farmers; (vi) they associate with the programmes and plans
meant for the socio-economic development of the village; (vii) they are also involved in the
marketing of farm produce on behalf of the farmer-borrowers; (viii) they provide storage
facilities and marketing finance; and (ix) they supply certain consumer goods like rice, wheat,
sugar, kerosene, cloth etc. at fair prices.

3.2 District Central Cooperative Banks (DCCBs)

DCCBs function as a link between the PACS and State Cooperative Banks (SCBs). They are
basically meant for meeting the credit requirement of PACS. They also undertake banking
business such as accepting deposits from public, collecting bills, cheques, drafts etc. and
providing credit to the needy persons. The area of operation varies from taluk to district but
in most of the states their operations are confined to the taluk level. Membership of the
DCCBs is open to individuals and societies working in its area of operation. Marketing
societies, consumer societies, farming societies, urban banks and PACS are usually enrolled
as members of this bank. The specific functions of the bank are:

(i) to supervise and inspect the activities of PACS and help the credit societies run smoothly;

(ii) to maintain close and constant contact and guide the primary societies and provide
leadership to them; (iii) to undertake non-credit activities like supply of seeds, fertilizers
besides sugar, kerosene and other consumer goods; (iv) to provide requisite funds to societies
under their control; and (v) to accept deposits from the member societies as well as from
public.

3.3 State Cooperative Bank (SCB)

SCBs are at the apex of the cooperative credit organization present at the state capitals. They
perform the same functions for the DCCBs as the latter does for the PACS. The membership
comprises of DCCBs and individuals. Being at the apex level, this bank mobilizes and
deploys financial resources among the various sectors. It finances and controls the working of
the DCCBs in the state. It also serves as a link between the RBI and DCCBs. The Specific
functions of SCBs:
(i) SCBs perform as the banker’s bank for the DCCBs;
(ii) SCBs banks facilitate the respective Sate Governments to draw up cooperative and other
development plans as well as their implementation;

8
(iii) they act as a link between the DCCBs and the RBI;

(iv) they supervise, control and guide the activities of DCCBs;

(v) these banks also perform normal banking operations;

(vi) they grant subsidies to DCCBs for development of cooperative activities;

(vii) they formulate and implement uniform credit policies; and

(vii) these banks coordinate their own policies with those of the cooperative movement of the
government.

3.4 Primary Land Development Banks (PLDBs)

The establishment of the Land Mortgage Bank (LMBs) on cooperative lines dates back to the
year 1920 in Punjab. Later during the period 1920-29, a number of LMBs were established in
the states of Punjab, Madras, Mysore, Assam and Bengal. After that not much growth was
observed in the number of LMBs till 1945. However, during 1945-53 a rapid growth was
observed in the number of these banks. During this period only rich and affluent farmers
derived benefits of these banks and small and marginal farmers remained untouched of the
developments. LMBs got massive support from the RBI, SBI, LIC and Agricultural
Refinance Corporation. As a result LMBs had to reorient its lending policies in favour of
marginal and small farmers. LMBs were renamed as Land Development Banks (LDBs) in
1974. Primary LDBs are generally organized to serve the farmers at Taluk level. Its pecific
functions are:

(i) to provide long term finance to the needy farmers for the development of land, increasing
production and productivity of land;

(ii) to provide long term loan for minor irrigation and for redemption of old debts and
purchase of land;

(iii) to provide long term finance for purchase of tractors, machinery and equipments and
construction of farm structures; and

(iv) to mobilize rural savings.

3.5 Central Land Development Bank (CLDBs)

In many states PLDBs are federated into CLDBs. Branches of CLDBs, PLDBs and individual
entrepreneurs are the members of the CLDB. NABARD and LIC subscribe for its debentures
in large amounts. In fact, NABARD is the refinance agency of CLDBs. It acts as a link
between NABARD and the Government in long-term business transactions. It supervises and
guides the PLDBs. It inculcates the practice of thrift among member banks by mobilizing
savings and stimulating capital formation. The CLDBs provides loans to member banks for

9
the redemption of old debts, improvement, reclamation and development of land, purchase of
agricultural machinery and equipment and development of minor irrigation.

Box 4: Farmers Service Societies (FSS)

Farmers Service societies are registered cooperative bodies, based on the principles of
cooperation and governed by cooperative by-laws. Since the PACS are biased towards
affluent sections of rural areas, a need for a special body to serve weaker sections was felt.
FSS were organized in 1971, on the lines of Cooperative to provide integrated credit services
to the weaker sections of rural areas i.e., small and marginal farmers, rural artisnas and
agricultural laboureres. The specific function of the FSS are:
i) to supply all types of loans to weaker sections viz. crop loans, medium term loans and long
term loans;
ii) to provide adequate supply of requisite inputs and technical guidance for the development
of agriculture on timely and regular basis;
iii) to encourage dairy, fisheries, poultry, farm forestry and other subsidiary occupations in
rural areas;
iv) to make arrangements for bringing about improvements in agricultural markets; and
v) to mobilize deposits and small savings from weaker sections through incentives.
Area of operation: The societies have been launched in selected districts. Each society has a
jurisdiction of a block or a portion thereof. A district union of these societies is there at the
district level to suggest ways and means for improving and organizing these societies for
executing specific activities. The membership of these societies is open to those who are
eligible to get assistance under Small Farmers Development Agency (SFDA) and Marginal
and Small Farmers Development Agency (MFAL) programmes. Others may be associate
members without any voting rights.
Sponsorship: The lead bank of the district generally sponsors the FSS in financial matters.
Capital Structure: The various sources for funds are: share capital, loans, funds contributed
by commercial banks, cooperative societies, subsidies from SFDA and MFAL and
commissions accrued to the society through supply of essential inputs and interest on
advances. Share capital is contributed by its members, lead bank and the State Government.
Management: The number of the members of the Board of Directors varies from 9 to 13
depending upon the size of the society. One full-time managing director is deputed by the
lead bank. Five directors will be elected from the members of the society of which three are
from small and marginal categories and two from other farmers. The remaining directors are
representatives of financial institutions. Block Development Office, Department of
Agriculture and Cooperative societies.

10
3.6 Large-sized Adivasi Multi-purpose Cooperative Societies (LAMPS)

LAMPS were organised for the first time in December 1971 on the lines of FSS on the
recommendation of Bawa team appointed by the Government of India to look into the credit
problems of tribal areas. According to its framed objectives, these societies are expected to
provide all types of credit including consumption credit through a single window.
Intensification and modernisation of agriculture with appropriate technical guidance and
improving the marketing of agricultural and forest products in the tribal areas, are their other
objectives.

Membership and Area of Operation: All tribes can become members of this society on
voluntary basis. It can cover an area of a block to a taluk.

Sources of Capital: Share capital of members and state governments, entrance fee, reserve
fund, deposits collected from members and non-members and loans taken from cooperative
institutions, Government are the various sources of capital.

Management: These are managed by a Board of Directors comprising 11 members. Five

directors come from tribal members, two from non-tribal members, two nominated by the
Registrar of cooperatives and two nominees from the lead bank of the district. One of the
nominees acts as the Managing Director of LAMPS.

4. Regional Rural Banks

The establishment of Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) has been a landmark in the history of
rural banking. Till 1968, the official policy was in favour of developing cooperative credit
system. In 1969, All India Rural Credit Review Committee found that over large parts of the
country small farmers had been lacking access to cooperative credit. Further, the quantum of
credit from the cooperative system was too little to meet the credit requirements of
agriculture. In 1969 a major effort was made to improve rural credit delivery system through
nationalisation of 14 commercial banks which emphasized on opening of rural branches. But
rural branches of commercial banks (CBs) proved to be a source of channelising savings from
rural areas to urban areas. They also lacked trained personnel to handle rural issues and acted
more as a competitor to the cooperative credit system rather than supplementing it. As CBs
worked more for profit earning, they failed to include the disadvantaged sections of the
society in their banking domain.

Thus keeping these shortcomings in view, Banking Commission 1972 recommended that a
chain of rural banks be set up in addition to the regular branches of commercial banks. A
Working Group was set up under the chairmanship of Mr. M. Narasimham to give
suggestions to improve the rural credit delivery system. The Group suggested institution of
Regional Rural Banks as a means to provide low cost credit to rural artisans, landless
labourers and small and marginal farmers. The 20 point programme of the Government also
envisaged making credit available to weaker sections of the society. Thus the Regional Rural
Banks ordinance was promulgated by the president on 26th September, 1975 which came into
force with immediate effect. On October 2, 1975 five RRBs were set up at Moradabad and
Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh, Bhiwani in Haryana, Jaipur in Rajasthan and Malda in West

11
Bengal. These banks were sponsored by the Syndicate Bank, State Bank of India, Punjab
National Bank, United Commercial Bank and United Bank of India. The Ordinace of 1975
was replaced by the Regional Rural bank Act 1976.

RRBs were expected to play a vital role in mobilizing the savings of the small and marginal
farmers, artisans, agricultural labourers and small entrepreneurs and inculcate banking habit
among the rural people. These institutions were also expected to plug the gap created in
extending the credit to rural areas by largely urban-oriented commercial banks and the rural
cooperatives, which have close contact with rural areas but fall short in terms of funds.

4.1 Objectives
The RRBs have following objectives:
1. to develop rural economy;
2. to provide credit for agriculture and allied activities;
3. to encourage village industries, artisans, carpenters, craftsmen, etc.;
4. to reduce dependence of weaker sections on money-lenders;
5. to identify a specific and functional gap in the present institutional structure;
6. to supplement the other institutional agencies in credit delivery to rural areas, and
7. to make backward and tribal areas economically better by opening new branches.

4.2 Characteristic features of Regional Rural Banks

1. Sponsorship: Every RRBs is sponsored by a commercial bank, usually the lead bank
of the district. In some areas State Cooperative Banks and Private Banks are allowed
to sponsor RRBs.
2. Jurisdiction: The operational area to be covered by each RRB varies from one to two
districts for efficient functioning. The number of branches in the area covered by each
RRB may range from 50 to 60 keeping in view the operational and financial
efficiency. Each branch of a RRB is expected to serve a population of approximately
20,000. However, these are subject to change as per the direction of the Central Bank
of the country.
3. Management: The management of the bank is in the hands of a Board of Directors
numbering eight, headed by a Chairman, who is an Officer of the sponsoring bank. Of
the eight Directors, three are nominees of the sponsoring bank, two from State
Government dealing with district development programmes and three from the
Central Government. The sponsoring bank provides assistance to RRBs for the first
five years in recruitment and operational matters.
4. Share Capital: The authorized share capital of a RRB has been fixed at Rs 1 Crore
and issued capital at Rs 25 lakhs. This is contributed by the Central Government,
State Government and the sponsoring Bank in the ratio of 50, 15 and 35, respectively.
On the recommendation of working group of 1986, the Government has increased the
authorized capital to Rs 5 Crores and issued capital to Rs 1 Crore to improve their
viability.
5. Functions: The main functions of RRBs are to grant loans and advances particularly
to small and marginal farmers, agricultural labourerers, cooperative societies, artisans

12
 and small entrepreneurs within its operational area. They extend other banking
facilities also such as issuing of drafts, collection of cheques etc. They also play a
vital role in the rural developmental programmes of the Government.
6. Rate of Interest: The rate of interest on the loans charged is the same as collected by
PACS. They have been allowed to offer 0.50 per cent higher interest on deposits than
offered by CBs.
i) Special Concessions to RRBs:

a. Statutory Liquidity Ratio(SLR) to be maintained is fixed at 25 per cent as

against 38 per cent by CBs;
b. RRBs are allowed to pay 0.5 per cent higher interest rate to its depositors over
the interest rates paid by CBs;
c. Cash Reserve Requirement (CRR) of 3 per cent to be maintained with RBI as
against 10 per cent by CBs;
d. They are allowed to draw refinance from NABARD to the extent of 50 per
cent or more depending upon the type of advance of the eligible outstanding
loans at a concessional interest rate of 7 per cent per annum; and
e. The RRBs are registered as insured banks with Deposit Insurance and Credit
Guarantee Corporation of India (DICGC). All deposits up to 30,000 in each
bank are accordingly insured with the DICGC thus providing protection to the
depositors.
4.3 Performance of RRBs

The Narasimham Committee (1991) made a number of observations on the functioning of

RRBs. According to him RRBs had low earning capacity. They had not been able to earn
much profit in view of their policy of restricting their operations to target groups. The
recovery position of RRBs was not satisfactory. There were a large number of defaulters.
Their cost of operation was high on account of the increase in the salary scales of the
employees in line with the salary structure of the employees of commercial banks. In most
cases, these banks followed the same methods of operation and procedures as followed by
commercial banks. Therefore, these procedures did not found favour with the rural masses. In
many cases, banks were not located at the right place. For instance, the sponsoring banks
were also running their branches in the same areas where RRBs were operating. The
Committee also made remedial measures for better performance of these banks. The
Committee also suggested ways and means to improve the functioning of RRBs. It included
streamlining if interest rates at par with CBs and alternative to merge with the sponsor banks
in case of non-viable RRBs.

However, in period following this report RRBs made impressive strides on various business
indicators. For instance, deposits of RRBs have grown by 18 times and advances by 13 times
between 1980 and 1990. Between 1990 and 2004, deposits and advances grew by 14 times
and 7 times, respectively (Table 2). Between the year 2000 and 2004, loans disbursed by
RRBs more than doubled reflecting the efforts taken by the banks to improve credit flow to
the rural sector. The average per branch advances also increased from Rs.25 lakh in March
1990 to Rs.154 lakh in March 2003. When one considers the deployment of credit relative to
the mobilisation of resources, the credit-deposit (C-D) ratio of RRBs were more than 100 per
cent during the first decade of their operations up to 1987. Though the C-D ratio subsequently
became lower, of late, it has shown an improvement and went up from around 39 per cent in
March 2000 to 44.5 per cent in March 2004.

13
Table 2: Evolution of RRBs: Select Indicators
(Rs Crore)
Parameter 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2004
No. of RRBs 85 188 196 196 196 196
Capital 21 46 91 166 1,959 2,221
Deposits 222 1,315 4,023 11,141 32,226 56,295
Advances 262 1,405 3,384 5,987 12,427 25,038
Interest Earned NA NA 480 1,158 3,938 5,535
Total Income NA NA 53 1,230 4,145 6,231
Operating Profit NA NA 12 -280 524 1,044
Source: Mishra (2006)
5. National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD)
5.1 Genesis

Prior to independence, long term credit requirement for agriculture were met by money
lenders and to a small extent by state governments. Considering this, All India Rural Credit
Survey Committee (1951) and Committee on Cooperative Credit (1960) emphasized the need
for arrangements for long-term finance for investment in agriculture and suggested the
establishment of an institution at the apex level. The Standing Advisory Committee of RBI
on Agriculture Credit had also supported the recommendations. Consequent to their
recommendations, Parliament through an Act of 1963 provided for the establishment of
Agriculture Refinance Corporation (ARC) form July 1, 1963. It was basically a refinancing
agency, meant for promotion and development of agriculture through long-term financial
assistance. Considering its developmental and promotional role, it was renamed as
Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation( ARDC). Ever since its inception, it
financed term finance which included medium term and long term loans for major
agricultural development projects, which were so far neglected by existing financial
institutions.

ARDC could not make much headway in the field of direct financing and delivery of rural
credit against the massive credit demand for rural development. Its role to meet the
challenges in integrated rural credit through institution building, training, research, policy
making, planning and providing expertise in the diverse disciplines of finance was inadequate
and insufficient. As a result many committees and commissions viz. Banking Commission
(1972), National Commission on Agriculture (1976) and Committee to Review Arrangements
for Institutional Credit for Agriculture and Rural Development(CRAFICARD) in 1979 under
the chairmanship of B. Shivaraman, former member of planning Commission recommended
the setting up of a National Level Institution called National Bank for Agricultural and Rural
Development (NABARD) for providing all types of production and investment credit for
agriculture and rural development. In pursuance to their recommendations, NABARD came
into existence in July 1982. The erstwhile ARDC, the Agricultural Credit Department (ACD)
and Rural Planning and Credit Cell (RPCC) of RBI were merged with NABARD.

14
5.2 Objectives

As a apex refinancing institution NABARD purveys all types of credit needed for the farm
sector and rural development. It is also vested with the responsibility of promoting and
integrating rural development activities through refinance. The bank is also providing direct
credit to an institution or agency or an individual subject to the approval of the Central
Government. It has close links with RBI for guidance and assistance in financial matters. As
an effective catalytic agent for rural development and in formulation of appropriate rural
development plans and policy, its role is remarkable.

5.3 Functions

i) It helps in planning and operational matters related to credit for agriculture and allied
activities, rural artisans, village industries and other rural development activities;

ii) It extends refinance to commercial banks for term loans in relation to agriculture and
rural development;

iii) It provides short term credit to state cooperative banks, RRBs, and any other financial
institution notified by RBI for a period not exceeding 18 months by way of refinance for
agricultural operations, marketing of crops and marketing and distribution of agricultural
inputs.

iv) It makes direct loan by way of refinance to all eligible institutions for a period not
exceeding 25 years.

v) It provides finance for production and marketing activities of rural artisans, cottage
industries, small-scale industries, handicrafts etc. in the rural areas.

vi) It facilitates all eligible financial institutions for conversion of production loans into term
loans in the times of natural calamities,

vii) It contributes to share capital and securities of eligible institutions and State Governments
concerned with agriculture and rural development. It also helps State Governments to
contribute to the share capital of eligible institutions working for rural development.

viii) It offers advice and guidance to State Governments, co-opertative federations and
National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) and functions in close contact with
Central Government in matters related to agriculture and rural development.

ix) It coordinates and monitors all agricultural and rural lending activities with a view to
tie up with extension and planned development activities in rural areas; and

x) It conducts training, consultancy and research relating to agricultural finance and

agricultural and rural development.

15
5.4 Management

The management of NABARD is vested in the Board of Directors which consists of a

Chairman, two directors from amongst experts in rural economics, three directors out of
whom two be persons with experience in cooperative banking and one with experience in
commercial banking, three directors from among the officials of the State Governments, and
a Managing Director. Directors of the Board of Management are appointed by the Central
Government in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

5.5 Sources of Funds

Authorised share capital of NABARD is Rs 500 crores and issues and paid up capital is Rs
100 crores. NABARD accrues additional funds from borrowings from the Government of
India and any institution approved by the Government of India, issue and sale of bonds i.e.
Rural Infrastructural Development Bond, borrowings from RBI, deposits from State
Governments and local authorities and gifts and grants received.

5.6 Performance of NABARD

In the last two decades of its existence NABARD has taken many initiatives to meet the
credit requirement for the development of agriculture and rural areas. The Government has
established Rural Infrastructural Development Fund within NABARD from April 1995. The
fund will provide loans to State Governments and State Owned Corporations for completing
on-going projects relating to medium and minor irrigation, soil conservation, watershed
management and other forms and rural infrastructure. NABARD has also implemented a
“Partership Model” of linking of self-help groups to CBs along with involvement of a NGO.
The model has been largely successful in delivering financial services to rural poor.
NABARD has also introduced a rehabilitation programme for the weak DCCBs and SCBs.

6. Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC)

Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC) was incorporated on April 10, 1968 by the Indian
Banks’ Association in order to provide advisory services to commercial banks in matters
related to financing agriculture. Basically, AFC is a consortium of commercial banks
established under the Indian Companies Act 1956 to provide consultancy services to member
banks in matters related to projects for agriculture and rural development. Scheduled
commercial banks numbering 37, notified under RBI Act of 1934 had subscribed to the share
capital of the corporation. The authorized share capital of AFC was Rs 100 crore and the
issued share capital was Rs 10 Crore.

The Corporation has two distinct roles: financing the individual

institutions/organizations/individuals involving agricultural development and promoting
commercial bank advances for agricultural development. The financing roles included – (a)
sinking, deepening and energising of irrigation wells; (b)production, distribution and
marketing of agricultural inputs such as seeds, fertilizers, insecticides, machinery and

16
implements; (c) construction of storage structures for foodgrains and fertilisers ; and (d)
establishments of agricultural service units. The promotional role included–
(a)commercialization and industrialization of agriculture (b) formulation of potential
projects to be financed by banks and removal of various handicaps and difficulties
experienced by commercial banks and farmer-borrowers; and (c) development of
cooperation, coordination and consortium arrangement among different lending agencies and
co-opersatives involved in agricultural financing.

In recent years AFC has assumed only consultancy roles extending project consultancy
services to banks, Central/State Governments, NABARD, cooperatives, private sector and
international funding agencies. It also undertakes surveys and research studies including,
socio-economic, market, baseline, concurrent and impact evaluation surveys, credit demand
studies, farm management studies, MIS studies and resource management studies both at
national and international levels

7. Problems in Agricultural Credit System

Agricultural credit system in the country is faced with many problems, which restrict its
outreach to different areas and sections of farming classes as well as hindering its growth and
contribution towards agricultural growth to the optimum level. These problems can be
discussed under following heads:

(i) Transaction Costs of Agricultural Credit

Two issues are involved in agricultural lending in India. The banking sector has to cater a
very large number of small borrowers spread over a very large area. Secondly, size of the
loan is very small. The small and marginal farmers constitute more than 80 per cent of the
farmers and some of the areas are remotely located. Catering to their requirements of farmers
of such areas becomes very difficult and costly. From borrowers’ point of view, access to
intuitional credit especially for small, resource poor and illiterate farmers gets inhibited as the
procedural and documentation requirements are cumbersome, time consuming and increase
the cost of borrowing for the farmers. On the other hand, access to non-institutional credit is
regarded to be very simple where transaction cost is negligible and involve no procedural
complications. Empirical studies show that transaction cost in case of non-institutional loans
was negligible whereas it ranged from 3 to 5 per cent in case of CBs, 1.4 to 3 per cent in case
of cooperatives and more than 8 per cent in case of RRBs.

(ii)Loan Overdues

Recovery of loans is an important aspect in the economic viability of rural financial

institutions as the range of services provided by them is limited and focused on advancing of
loans only. Some empirical studies have suggested poor recovery performance of agricultural
loans. Major reasons for high level of loan default are - low level of income generation,
particularly on small farms, diversion of loans for unproductive purposes, inadequacy of
loans leading to their diversion and willful default under the hope that they will be waived in
future. Though the average rate of loan default in agriculture is 37 per cent, the recovery
performance varies greatly across states/regions and financial institutions. The recovery

17
performance has been more than 80 per cent in relatively developed states like Punjab,
Kerela, Haryana and Tamil Nadu, It has been 60-80 per cent in case of Andhra Pradesh,
Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. The
recovery performance is poor in eastern and north-eastern states except West Bangal. There is
one good feature that where the use of institutional credit was higher, the recovery
performance was also better.

(iii) Economic Viability of rural Credit Institutions

Agricultural loans were considered to be unviable by rural financial institutions due to low
rates of interest and high risk and transaction cost in the pre-reform period. The interest rate
structure started undergoing changes after the financial sector reforms of 1991 in order to
improve the economic viability of rural credit and provide more flexibility to banking
institutions to decide the interest rate structure for agriculture and other sectors. The interest
rates were further rationalised after the exchange rate mechanism was made more flexible
and foreign capital was allowed in the Indian economy. Recently, agricultural loans up to Rs.
50,000 has been made available at a rate of 9 per cent. However, sharp rise in interest rates
for different sectors of economy has put a pressure for upward revision in the interest rates of
agricultural loans as well. Still the economic viability of rural financial institutions is not
good due to high transaction and risk cost. It was noted that the net margins (as per cent of
working capital) in the case of DCCBs was negative at All-India level while the economic
position of RRBs has improved. The cooperative loans have become more costly due to some
margins getting added at every level of its three-tier structure.

(iv) Access to Institutional Credit of Small Farmers

The small and marginal farmers constitute 80 per cent of operational holdings and cultivate
around 36 per cent of area in India. Their number is expected to grow in future due to sub-
division of holdings and lack of employment opportunities in the non-farm sector. Due to
their small holding they are disadvantageously placed with respect to access to technology,
credit and other institutional supports. The information on distribution of institutional
agricultural credit shows that their access to credit to meet their short term and long term
capital requirements has not improved over the years.

There are some disquieting features of lending to small borrowers. The number of ‘small-
borrower accounts’ in case of commercial banks has come down over time indicating shifting
of their focus to large borrowers. The rate of growth in agricultural advances to small and
marginal farmers (less than 2 ha) by scheduled commercial banks in the 1990s has come
down as compared to other farm size categories due to which their share declined from 54 per
cent in TE 1993 to 51 per cent in total agricultural credit in TE 2002. The All India Debt and
Investment Survey (AIDIS) showed that rural households with assets less than Rs 20,000 had
access to institutional loans for their credit needs only up to 35 to 37 per cent while the share
of non-institutional agencies in the outstanding debt was as high as 52 to 62 per cent. In case
of higher asset households, 70 per cent of the outstanding debt came from institutional
sources. Therefore, in spite of strong network of rural branches and strong emphasis on target
lending under poverty alleviation programmes, creating self-employment opportunities, etc, a
large number of rural poor remain outside the fold of formal banking system for their credit

18
needs. The important factors impeding the access of disadvantaged sections to institutional
credit are higher transaction costs due to large numbers and small borrowings, higher risk
cost, complicated procedures and large documentation required, inability of small borrowers
to provide tangible collaterals, non-availability of tenancy agreements, loan waivers affecting
recovery performance, poor risk mitigation mechanism for farmers in the wake of natural
calamities and crop failure and mind set of bankers against small loans viewing them as
unprofitable.
(v) Indebtedness among the Farmers
Indebtedness of Indian farmers has a long history. The Deccan Riots Commission of 1875
reported that one third of the occupants of government land were under debt. The Famine
Commission of 1880 reported that one third of the land holders of the country were under
deep debt and another one third were also under debt but in position to redeem it. The
Famine Commission of 1901 estimated that more than 80 per cent of farmers were under
debt. The Great Depression of 1929-30 also worsened the debt situation. The problem of
indebtedness of Indian farmers in the post-independent India continues ( Table 3) with
varying degrees. After 1981, indebtedness has shown an increasing trend over the years with
57.2 per cent of cultivators indebted in 2003. According to the 50th round of the National
Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) in 2005, if farmers engaged in allied agricultural
activities (going by principal source of income) are added to the cultivators then the
proportion of indebted farmers at all India level is 48.6 per cent. Deceleration in agricultural
growth in the 1990s is regarded as one of the most important factors responsible for
increasing indebtedness.

There is a wide variation in the number and proportion of indebted farmers across the states
and union territories (UTs) of India. At all India-level 48.6 per cent of the total farmers are
reported to be indebted. The incidence of indebtedness is the highest in Andhra Pradesh
(82.0) peer cent followed by Tamil Nadu (74.5 per cent). Punjab (65.4 per cent), Karnataka
(61.6 per cent) and Maharashtra (54.8 per cent). The states of Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat,
Madhya Pradesh and west Bengal and group of UTs have reported indebtedness among the
farmers to the extent of 50-53 per cent. The states of Meghalaya (4.1 per cent), Arunachal
Pradesh (5.9 per cent) and Uttaranchal (7.2 per cent) have reported very low incidence of
indebtedness among farmers The rest of the states have reported indebtedness in the range of
18.1 per cent in Assam to 49.2 per cent in Tripura. The states with high level of agricultural
development are reported to be home of a higher proportion of indebted farmers. The
outstanding debt also varies considerably according to the amount across states and farm
sizes.
Table 3: Indebtedness among Cultivators in India
Year Percentage indebted Cultivators

1971 46.1

1981 22.3

1991 25.9

2003 57.2

Source: NSSO (2005)

19
The states with high level of agricultural development and with commercial farming report
high level of per farmer debt. Crop failure due to droughts/floods, pest attacks and use of
spurious insecticides and productive loans also add to high incidence of indebtedness.

The prevalence of informal loans generates interlinked transactions in the market. The
farmers borrowing from informal sources generally use their crop as a collateral and commit
to sell the output to the lender. The loans are also used to acquire modern inputs like
herbicides, insecticides, seeds, fertilizers and also consumer goods from the lenders. In some
of the cases farmers buy inputs as well as sell output via lenders. The interlinked transactions
take place because lenders are engaged in marketing of agricultural inputs, consumer goods
and agricultural output along with money lending. The professional money
lenders/commission agents charge high interest rates generally between 18-36 per cent per
annum and also exploit the farmers in supply of inputs and marketing od agricultural output.
This has negative implications for agricultural development and cripples the farmers’
capacity to return loans and come out of debt trap.

Farmers’ suicide in India has been reported regularly for period of a decade and half. The
states of Andhra Pradesh , Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala and Punjab are the major states
where such incidents have been experienced. The emergence of this phenomenon has also
become a subject of debate among the scholars, social organizations and policy makers.
Studies have shown that mainly economic and in scattered cases non-economic factors have
been responsible for farmers’ suicide. Among economic factors, the failure of crop (mainly
cotton) and failure of investment in bore wells are responsible for involvement of farmers in
debt trap. Stagnant agricultural yields among Punjab farmers has been found to a cause of
their stress. In the wake of limited access to institutional credit, the small farmers are forced
to borrow from non-institutional sources. At times they rotate credit from non-institutional to
institutional sources and vice versa leading to their exploitation by multiple agencies. There
are a large number of factors which operate simultaneously and cause unbearable distress to
the farmer. The resource poor farmers in all the major states reporting suicides constitute the
largest proportion of suicide victims. Thus it can be concluded that farmers suicides are more
common in states which are forerunner of commercial agriculture. They are Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, Kerala , Maharashtra and Punjab. These are the states which show high proportion
of the farmers under outstanding debt. With the exception of Kerala and Maharashtra, these
are the states where farmers dependence on informal sources of credit is very high. In
majority of the cases, the suicide victim farmers have used loans for investment in agriculture
and they belong to the category of small and marginal farmers. The resource poor farmers’
suicides indicate that there is breakdown of the community sense and social support
mechanism in areas of highly commercialised and competitive agriculture.

8.. Issues in Rural Credit

Broadly speaking, there are three major issues before the rural financial institutions which
need attention for making the agriculture sector make a significant contribution to the
economic growth of the country – (1) The quantum of flow of institutional credit to
agriculture has to be increased; (2) The access to formal credit for the rural poor and
disadvantaged and agriculturally less developed regions has to be improved; and (3) the
economic viability of rural banking system has to be ensured over time.

20
First, the flow of credit to agriculture sector has to be increased. Productive agriculture
requires investment in complementary assets like irrigation, farm machinery, and livestock.
However, irrigation development is pivot to all aspects of agricultural development. Sixty per
cent of the net area sown in the country is rainfed and unirrigated. Further, exploitation of
irrigation potential through investments in watershed development, developing minor
irrigation sources like tanks and wells and development and promotion of technology for
efficient water management should receive priority in formal lending.

The credit delivery system has been found wanting with respect to meeting adequately credit
requirements of high-tech and high-value agriculture, value addition, processing and
marketing activities of the farmers. Apart from crop sub-sector, the financing of activities like
animal husbandry, fisheries, agricultural services will require vast credit support. New loan
products such as pledge financing, marketing credit, loan against warehouse receipts, export
credit and venture capital for agricultural entrepreneurship shall have to be promoted to meet
the challenges posed by globalization. The present credit delivery system only emphasizes
production credit. Thus the imbalance between production and post-production credit needs
to be rectified.

Secondly, the outreach of formal agricultural credit is not adequate to rural poor, small and
marginal farmers and agriculturally less developed areas. Linking of self-help groups (SHGs)
with financial institutions with the help of non-governmental orgainsation (NGOs) has
yielded positive results in the form of asset creation, increased income and greater
employment for these disadvantaged sections of the society. Such successful examples of
forming SHGs encouraging them to save and provide micro-finance have to be replicated.
The consumption requirements of the poor need to be integrated with production
requirements. Crop insurance programmes need to be more effective for taking care of risks
arising out of crop failure. Tenants lack access to credit because tenancy agreement is not in
written form. If the land-lease market is made free, it would help such farmers in procuring
formal credit.

Finally, The cost of borrowings to the farmers is also an important issue affecting the flow of
credit to agriculture sector. The rate of interest to agriculture has been recently brought down
to 9 per cent for loans less than Rs 50,000 and 10.5-12.5 per cent on loans above Rs 50,000.
The cost of credit from cooperative institutions is still high because at every tier of the three
tier structure some costs and margins are added and secondly, cooperatives offer higher
interests on deposits. The NABARD has amended its 1981 act to provide refinance directly to
DCCBs. Yet the transaction cost is high, which need to be reduced by introducing new
products like group lending, strengthening of SHGs-Bank linkages and improving efficiency
of the staff through information technology (IT) tools and increasing the volume of business
and providing multi-purpose credit facility. Kisan Credit Card scheme has helped reducing
transaction costs by providing access to all types of short term credits. Some procedural
modifications are also required to reduce the cost of transaction cost, such as simplification of
forms, delegation of more powers to branch managers, introduction of composite cash credit
limit, cash disbursements of loans without tying it with kind components, dispensation of ‘No
Due Certificate’, lending through non-bank financial companies etc. Flexibility in the loans
with regard to use and repayment can also increase the flow of agricultural credit and reduce
transaction costs.

The globalization of agriculture is underway with a number of changes such as changes in

livelihood pattern, pattern of holdings, high-value agriculture, agribusiness development and

21
food retailing. The rural credit institutions must shed their inhibitions to support the process
of agricultural diversification and commercialization. A progressive integration of financial
markets with emphasis on self regulation, accountability and autonomy of the institutions
with social responsibility will be required.

Suggested Readings and References

1 Government of India (2005) Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, Directorate of Economics and

Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India. New Delhi.
2 Lekhi, R. K. and Joginder Singh (2002), Agricultural Economics, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
3 NSSO (2005), Indebtedness of Farmer Households, 59th Round, Publication No. 498, Government of
India, New Delhi
4 Sidhu R. S. and S.S. Gill (2006), “Agricultural Credit and Indebtedness in India: Some Issues”, Indian
Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 61, No. 1, Jan-March, 2006, pp. 11-35.
5 Singh, Harpreet and M. K. Sekhon (2005), “Cash-in Benefits of the Kisan Credit Card Scheme: Onus is
upon the Farmer”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 60, No. 3, July-Sept, 2005, pp. 319-
334.
6 Subba Reddy, S. and P. Raghu Ram (2005), Agricultural Finance and Management, Oxford IBP
publishing Company, New Delhi.
7 Thorat, Y. S. P. (2006),“ Rural Credit in India: Issues and Concerns”, Indian Journal of Agricultural
Economics, Vol. 61, No. 1, Jan-March, 2006, pp. 1-10.
8 www.afcindia.com
9 www.nabard.org
10 Misra, B. S.(2006), The Performance of Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) in India: Has Past Anything to
Suggest for Future? Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Vol. 27, No. 1 and 2, Summer and
Monsoon 2006 pp. 89-118.
11 Villareal, L.V. and Upare, M.A.(2003), Report of the National Workshop on Best Practices in
Microfinance Programmes for Women in Coastal Fishing Communities in India. Panaji, Goa, India, 1-
4 July 2003. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 724. Rome, FAO. 50p.

22