522 Danthanh Asm1 Gbd18485
522 Danthanh Asm1 Gbd18485
522 Danthanh Asm1 Gbd18485
Qualificatio
BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business
n
Unit number
Unit 11: Research Project
and title
Student declaration
I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I
Student’s
signature
Grading grid
P P M
1 2 1
RESEARCH PROJECT
IMPACT OF FACTORS ON EMPLOYEES’
PERFORMANCE IN FPT
I.
II. Introduction
Founded on September 13, 1988, FPT operates in three core business areas, including
Technology, Telecommunications, and Education. During the operation, FPT always
strives with the highest goal of bringing customer satisfaction through the best
technology services, products, and solutions. At the same time, FPT constantly
researches and pioneers in new technology trends, contributing to affirming
Vietnam's position in the 4th industrial revolution - the Digital Revolution. FPT will
pioneer to provide comprehensive digital transformation services to organizations
and businesses on a global scale.
However, the issue of improving employee performance at FPT has not been
discussed much and has not gone into the analysis of core information. Therefore, this
paper will study and analyze more clearly about values, data, and especially
suggestions to increase employee productivity.
The main objective of this paper is to describe a realistic picture of the effectiveness of
the work environment on employee performance. The second goal is to find the
connection between management and employee performance. The ultimate goal of
this paper is to provide recommendations for the superior to apply and improve to
maximize employee performance.
The scope of the topic revolves around the impact of the environment on employee
performance at FPT. The paper is studied for about 10 days - a reasonable time for
further analysis into issues. And the research is limited to the survey subjects, mainly
aimed at employees working at FPT.
This paper uses descriptive statistical methods, factor analysis, and regression to
analyze and assess more clearly the impact that the working environment has on
employees' performance.
III. Literature review
The generally held belief is that better work conditions yield better outcomes. Mostly, the
workplace is built with due attention to the essence of the job and to the people who are
going to a job in that office. At the corporate level, several variables have an effect on
profitability, such as staff, infrastructure, and organizational goals. This also depends on the
nature of the workplace and its effect on the safety and welfare of employees.
According to Borman, & Motowidlo (1993); Campbell et al. (1993); Roe (1999),
performance is a multi-component term and, at the fundamental level, the process
dimension of success, i.e. behavioral commitments, can be differentiated from the intended
result. Employee performance relates to how workers behave in the workplace and how
well they accomplish the tasks that you put on them. The behavior here denotes the conduct
that people show in order to perform a task, while the outcome element denotes the effects
of an individual's job actions (Campbell, 1990). Borman and Motowidlo (1997) described
job performance in the sense of task performance as the "effectiveness with which the
occupants of work perform their assigned tasks, which realizes the fulfillment of the vision
of the organization while rewarding the organization and the employee in a proportionate
manner." In the sense of sound work performance, Griffin, Neal, and Parker (2007) argued
that work competence may contribute to job performance, but that adaptability and
proactiveness to one's job position are essential in addressing uncertain business
environments.
The performance of the employee is known to be what the employee does and does
not do. Employee efficiency includes the quality and quantity of production, the
appearance at work, the pleasant and supportive disposition, and timeliness of
production. Based on the findings of the Yang (2008) individual performance analysis,
it has been shown that the success of individuals can not be confirmed. Likewise, it
argues that companies should use direct incentives and promotions on the basis of
individual results if the performance of workers is measurable (Yang, 2008).
In line with Yang (2008), Bishop (1987) investigated the performance of employees
and reported that praise and acknowledgment and reward for the performance of
employees discriminated against the productivity of employees. To attract clients,
companies make a lot of effort but do not pay attention to pleasing workers. The truth
is, though, that consumers will not be pleased until and until workers are satisfied.
Because, if workers are satisfied, further research will be undertaken so that
eventually consumers will be satisfied (Ahmad, 2012). Employee performance is
primarily influenced by motivation because if workers are motivated, they can work
with more commitment and eventually increase efficiency (Azar and Shafighi, 2013).
Work Enviroment
WORK ENVIROMENT
EMPLOYEES’
PERFORMANNCE
EMPLOYEE PERCEIVED TRAINING
EFFECTIVENESS
JOB SATISFIFACTION
IV. Research model and Research Hypothesis
- Research Model
- Research Hypothesis