ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN

HBEM4203
MANAGEMENT OF ACADEMIC AND CO CURRICULAR EXCELLENCE /
PENGURUSAN KECEMERLANGAN AKADEMIK DAN KO-KURIKULUM
JANUARY 2020 SEMESTER / SEMESTER JANUARI 2020

INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENT / ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR

1. Answer in Malay or English.

Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris.

2. Number of words : 2,500 – 3,000 words excluding references.

Jumlah patah perkataan : 2,500 – 3,000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan.

3. Submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file.

Hantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail.

4. Submit your assignment ONLINE.

Tugasan ini perlu dihantar secara ONLINE.

5. Submission due date : 15 March 2020.

Tarikh akhir penghantaran : 15 Mac 2020.

6. This assignment accounts for 50% of the total marks for the course.
Tugasan ini menyumbang sebanyak 50% dari jumlah markah kursus.
 ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

This assignment is focussed on the management of a programme for co-curricular

excellence at a school of your choice. Those programme is implemented to ensure the
effectiveness and efficiency of co-curricular activities at the school. Study how such a
programme is implemented from the Planning-Organising-Directing-Control (PODC)
Model perspective. The programme also needs to be evaluated for its effectiveness.

Based on the perspective of the PODC Model, students should gather information from
relevant documents, records or internet sources related to the school's co-curriculum
matters.

PART 1
You are required to provide a report containing the following:
(1) Introduction;
(2) Description on a selected programme;
(3) Reviewing the Planning-Organising activities;
(4) Reviewing the Directing-Controlling activities;
(5) Conclusion;
(6) References (with APA format); and
(7) Academic writing organisation.

PART 2
Based on the report in Part A above, evaluate the programme effectiveness. Then, suggest
actions that can be taken to help schools to improve the effectiveness of the programme.

[Total: 50 Marks]

2|5
 SOALAN TUGASAN

Tugasan ini menfokuskan kepada pengurusan suatu program kecemerlangan kokurikulum di

sekolah pilihan anda. Program tersebut dilaksanakan bertujuan untuk memastikan
keberkesanan dan kecekapan aktiviti kokurikulum di sekolah. Kaji bagaimana program
sedemikian dilaksanakan dengan berdasarkan kepada perspektif Model Perancangan-
Penyusunan-Pengarahan-Pengawalan (Planning-Organising-Directing-Controling, PODC).
Program tersebut juga perlu dinilai keberkesanannya.

Dengan berasaskan perspektif Model PODC, pelajar perlu mengumpulkan maklumat

daripada dokumen-dokumen, rekod-rekod atau sumber-sumber internet yang relevan
dengan hal ehwal ko-kurikulum sekolah tersebut.

BAHAGIAN 1
Anda dikehendaki menyediakan laporan yang terdiri daripada perkara-perkara berikut:
(1) Pengenalan;
(2) Huraian tentang program yang dipilih;
(3) Kajian semula aktiviti Perancangan-Penyusunan;
(4) Kajian semula aktiviti Pengarahan-Pengawalan;
(5) Kesimpulan;
(6) Rujukan (dalam format APA); dan
(7) Organisasi penulisan akademik.

BAHAGIAN 2
Berdasarkan laporan di Bahagian A di atas, nilaikan keberkesanan program tersebut.
Kemudian, cadangkan tindakan-tindakan yang boleh diambil untuk membantu sekolah
meningkatkan lagi keberkesanan program tersebut.

[Jumlah : 50 Markah]

3|5
 ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

HBEM4203 MANAGEMENT OF ACADEMIC AND CO CURRICULAR EXCELLENCE / JANUARY 2020 SEMESTER

N CLO Criteria Weight Excellent Good Fair Low Unsatisfactory Max

Marks
4 3 2 1 0

PART 1
1 1 Introduction on the (i) co- 1.0 Introduction is very good Introduction is good and Introduction is Introduction is poorly No introduction 4
curriculum in schools, and (ii) and interesting to read with interesting to read. satisfactory. written. given.
summary of these assignment. an ability to motivate the
reader further.
1 1 Description on a selected 1.5 A detailed description is Detailed description is Detailed description is Description is provided in No description 6
programme. provided in terms of its provided in terms of its provided in terms of its terms of its objectives, given.
objectives, rationales and objectives, rationales and at objectives, rationales and rationales and at least
at least FOUR main least THREE main features/ at least TWO main ONE main feature/
features/ characteristics. characteristics. features/ characteristics. characteristic.
1 2 Discussion on the reviewing 2.0 Main features of Planning Main features of the Some features of the Some features the No description 8
Planning and Organising activities. and Organising activities Planning and Organising Planning and Organising Planning and Organising given.
are described in detail and activities are described in activities are described in activities are described in
reviewed. Student’s own detail and reviewed. detail. general terms.
impressions are included.
1 2 Discussion on the reviewing 2.0 Important actions of Important actions of Important actions of Important actions of No description 8
Directing and Controlling management in Directing management in Directing management in Directing management in Directing given.
activities. and Controlling the and Controlling the and Controlling the and Controlling the
programme are described programme are described in programme are described programme are
in detail and reviewed; with detail and reviewed. in detail. described in general
student’s own impressions terms.
are included.
1 2 Conclusion. 1.0 Very clear and coherent Clear conclusion written. Weak conclusion, and No clear conclusion No conclusion 4
conclusion written. poor wrapping-up. written. given.
1 1 References (in APA format). 0.5 SIX relevant references is FIVE relevant references is FOUR relevant references THREE relevant No reference given. 2
provided using APA provided using APA is provided using APA references is provided
Formatting Style. Formatting Style. Formatting Style. using APA Formatting
Style.

4|5
 1 1 Academic writing format – 0.5 Demonstrates an excellent Demonstrates a good Demonstrates a Demonstrates a poorly No quality given. 2
including the Cover Page, Table of quality of academic writing quality of academic writing satisfactory quality of quality of academic
Contents, Page Number, and format – included with format – included with academic writing format writing format – included
Citations. Cover Page, Table of Cover Page, Table of – included with some of some of Cover Page,
Contents, Page Number Contents, Page Number and Cover Page, Table of Table of Contents, Page
and Citations. Citations. Contents, Page Number Number and Citations.
and Citations.
TOTAL (PART 1) 8.5 34
PART 2
2 2 Evaluation of programme 2.0 Evaluates in terms of Evaluates in terms of Only evaluates in terms Evaluation is made but No evaluation 8
effectiveness. programme objectives and programme objectives and of EITHER programme based on criteria which given.
the general impressions of the general impressions of objectives OR the general are unclear.
the sources. Student’s own the sources. impressions of the
impressions are included. sources.
2 2 Explaination on the suggestions 2.0 The explaination of any The explaination of any The explaination of any The explaination of any No suggestion 8
for the improvement of the FOUR/more suggestions for THREE suggestions for TWO suggestions for suggestions for given.
selected programme. improvements of your improvements of your improvements of your improvements of your
selected programme is well selected programme is well selected programme is selected programme is
presented and is deemed to presented. fairly well presented. presented with lacks
be above expectation. coherence.
TOTAL (PART 2) 4.0 16
TOTAL (1 & 2) 12.5 50

*QN = Question Number

5|5