Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Journal of Renewable Energy

Volume 2015, Article ID 170896, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/170896

Research Article
Effect of Operating Conditions on Pollutants
Concentration Emitted from a Spark Ignition Engine
Fueled with Gasoline Bioethanol Blends

Haroun A. K. Shahad and Saad K. Wabdan

College of Engineering, University of Babylon, P.O. Box 4, Hilla, Babylon, Iraq

Correspondence should be addressed to Haroun A. K. Shahad; [email protected]

Received 18 September 2014; Revised 5 April 2015; Accepted 13 April 2015

Academic Editor: Onder Ozgener

Copyright © 2015 H. A. K. Shahad and S. K. Wabdan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.

This study is an experimental investigation of the effect of bioethanol gasoline blending on exhaust emissions in terms of carbon
dioxide CO2 , carbon monoxide CO, unburnt hydrocarbons UHC, and nitric oxide NOx of a spark ignition engine. Tests are
conducted at controlled throttle and variable speed condition over the range of 1200 to 2000 rpm with intervals 400 rpm. Different
compression ratios are tested for each speed, namely (7,8,10, and 11). Pure gasoline and bioethanol gasoline blends are used. The
bioethanol used is produced from Iraqi date crop (Zehdi). Blending is done on energy replacement bases. Ethanol energy ratio
(EER) used is 5%, 10%, and 15%. At each of the three designated engine speeds, the torque is set as 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14 N⋅m. It is
found that ethanol blending reduces CO and UHC concentration in the exhaust gases by about 45% and 40.15%, respectively, and
increases NOx and CO2 concentrations in the exhaust gases by about 16.18% and 7.5%, respectively. It is found also that load and
speed increase causes an increase in CO2 and NOx concentrations and reduces CO and UHC concentrations. It is also found that
increasing the compression ratio causes the emissions of CO2 and NOx to decrease and those of CO and UHC to increase.

1. Introduction miscibility of bioethanol with common gasoline, it can be

used as an additive to partially replace the gasoline as an
In recent years, given the dramatically increasing demand of automotive fuel [3]. Such mixtures are normally named after
energy, public concern has steadily increased regarding a pos- the amount or percentage of ethanol contained in the blended
sible shortage of fossil fuel resources, energy safety policies, fuel [3].
and environmental pollution regulations. The degradation of Bioethanol is a renewable, biodegradable, and environ-
the global environment and the foreseeable future depletion mentally friendly alternative fuel, because it can be produced
of worldwide fossil fuel reserves have been the driving force from agricultural products and scrapped resources. The road
to searching for alternative fuels that are sustainable and transport network using conventional fuels accounts for 23%
environmentally friendly. Ethanol fuel is one of the renewable of total greenhouse gas. These emissions can be reduced by
fuels for addressing these issues. The potential of ethanol using bioethanol fuel. Because of these benefits, bioethanol
fuel in improving the performance of internal combustion and ethanol-gasoline blends are widely investigated and used
engines has been recently the focus of many investigations [1, as alternative fuels in automotive vehicle [4–6]. The effects
2]. In 2005, the Australian Government’s Biofuels Taskforce of ethanol addition to gasoline on engine performance and
reported that the environmental and human health impact exhaust emissions were investigated experimentally and the-
of using ethanol as a biofuel was a major issue requiring oretically. It was found that the ethanol addition to gasoline
resolution in order to guide national policy measures aimed at has caused leaner operation and improved the combustion
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Because of the excellent process. The potential of ethanol fuel in reducing the emission
2 Journal of Renewable Energy

pollution of internal combustion engines has been extensively CO emission, but, on average, alcohol gasoline blends exhib-
investigated. Liao et al., 2005, [7] performed an experimental ited decreasing UHC emissions. In the 100 km/hr vehicle
study in a closed combustion chamber to investigate com- speed test, the alcohol gasoline blends provided lower NOx
bustion characteristics and pollutants emission of ethanol- emission values compared to pure gasoline. At all vehicle
gasoline blends at low temperature, which is related to the speeds, minimum CO2 emission was obtained when 5%
cold-start operation of engines fueled with ethanol-gasoline. methanol was added in gasoline. Sales and Sodré, 2012, [12]
The exhaust emissions were purposely measured in terms presented the exhaust emission levels from a flexible fuel
of unburned hydrocarbon UHC, CO, and NOx . It was engine with heated intake air and fuel during cold start
confirmed that the emissions of UHC during rich combustion operation. Electric resistances provided heating of intake air
at relatively low temperature increased with increasing the and fuel. The exhaust emissions from the engine equipped
addition of ethanol. with heated intake air and ethanol injector were compared
with the levels obtained from the conventional cold start
Najafi et al. 2009 [8] analyzed experimentally the pol- system that uses gasoline as auxiliary fuel. The use of heated
lutant emissions of a four-stroke SI engine operated with air and ethanol in substitution to the conventional system,
ethanol-gasoline blends of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% with that introduces gasoline in the intake pipe, to help cold
the aid of artificial neural network (ANN) theoretically. The start of a flexible fuel engine fuelled with hydrous ethanol
concentrations of CO and UHC emissions in the exhaust pipe (ethanol with 6.8% water mass content) produced significant
decreased when ethanol blends were increased. This was due reductions on raw exhaust UHC and CO emissions, especially
to the high oxygen percentage in the ethanol. In contrast, the in the first 150 s. Raw exhaust NOx emissions were slightly
concentrations of CO2 and NOx were found to be increased reduced after 200 s from cold start. Yang et al. 2012 [13]
when ethanol is introduced. Yusaf et al. 2009 [9] evaluated studied the effects of ethanol-blended gasoline on emissions
the use of potato waste bioethanol as an alternative fuel for of regulated air pollutant and carbonyls from motorcycles.
gasoline engines. The pollutant emissions of a four-stroke SI In addition, durability testing was performed on two brand-
engine operating on ethanol-gasoline blends have been inves- new motorcycles of the same model, using E3 in one and E0
tigated experimentally and theoretically. Experiments were in the other, to assess the effects of E3 usage on motorcycle
performed with the blends containing 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% emissions. The results show that average emission factors
by volume of ethanol. Exhaust gas emissions were measured of CO and UHC decreased by 20% and 5.27%, respectively,
and analyzed for UHC, CO2 , CO, O2 , and NOx at engine using E3 fuel. However, NOx and CO2 emissions increased
speed ranging from 1000 to 5000 rpm. The concentrations of by 5.22% and 2.57%, respectively.
CO and UHC emissions in the exhaust pipe were decreased
and the concentrations of CO2 and NOx were increased
when ethanol was introduced. Results obtained from both
2. Experimental Apparatus and Procedure
theoretical and experimental studies were compared. The The aim of work is to study the effect of bioethanol blending
simulation results have been validated against data from on the exhaust gas pollutants concentrations of a spark
experiments and a good agreement was noticed between the ignition engine. The bioethanol blending is done on energy
trends in the predicted and measured results. Seshaiah, 2010, replacement basis. Different blending ratios are to be tested.
[10] performed tests on a variable compression ratio spark No engine modification is made. The test engine, the instru-
ignition designed to run on pure gasoline, LPG (Isobutene), mentations, and the experimental program are described
and gasoline blended with ethanol 10%, 15%, 25%, and briefly in the following sections.
35% by volume. In addition, the gasoline was mixed with
kerosene at 15%, 25%, and 35% by volume without any 2.1. Test Engine and Instrumentation. The experiments are
engine modifications. The CO and CO2 emissions had been performed on a research engine, which is a variable com-
also compared for all tested fuels. It was observed that the pression ratio (varicomp), single cylinder, water cooled, dual
LPG is a promising fuel at all loads, which produced lesser fuel (gasoline/diesel) manufactured by prodit company, see
carbon monoxide emission compared with other fuels tested. Figure 1. The specifications of this engine are shown in
Ethanol was used as a fuel additive to the mineral gasoline; Table 1. The exhaust gases are analyzed using MEG001 gas
(up to 30% by volume) without any engine modification analysis and T156D gas analysis units while temperature
and with no efficiency loss. Ozsezen and Canakci, 2011, [11] measurement is done using thermocouple type K.
studied the exhaust emissions of a vehicle fueled with low
content alcohol (ethanol and methanol) blends and pure 2.2. Test Fuel. The pollutants concentrations of bio-ethanol-
gasoline. The vehicle tests were performed at wide-open blended gasoline (E5, E10, and E15) are to be evaluated and
throttle using an eddy current chassis dynamometer with compared with that of neat gasoline fuel (E0). The purity
vehicle speeds of 40, 60, 80, and 100 km/hr. The test results ratio of bioethanol is 99.9% [14]. The fuel blends are prepared
obtained with the use of alcohol gasoline blends, 5% and 10% just before starting the experiment to provide homogenous
alcohol by volume, were compared with the pure gasoline fuel mixture. The ethanol-supplementation ratio by energy
results. replacement is defined by the following equation:
In general, alcohol gasoline blends provided higher com-
bustion efficiency compared to pure gasoline. In exhaust EE
EER = × 100%, (1)
emission results, a stable trend was not seen, especially for GE + EE
Journal of Renewable Energy 3

Air supply
Table 2: Test fuel properties.
Engine fuel unit
system Computer and
The engine Control interface Properties Gasoline Ethanol
board
Chemical formula C8.23 H15.39 C2 H5 OH
Molecular weight (kg/kmol) 114.15 46.07
Density (kg/m3 at 20∘ C) 732 792
Oxygen (% wt.) 0 35
Octane number (RON) 86–94 105–108
Boiling point (∘ C) 25–230 78.5
Latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg) 289 854
Autoignition temperature (∘ C) 257 423
A/F ratio (by mass) 14.7 9
Engine cooling unit Lower heating value (MJ/kg) 43.8 26.7
Flash point −43 9
Figure 1: Test rig [14].
12

Table 1: Engine specifications. 10

Manufacture Prodites.a.s.
8
Cycle Otto or Diesel four stroke
CO2 (%)

Diameter 90 mm 6

Stroke 85 mm
4
Swept volume 541 mm3 Speed: 1600 rpm
CR: 7
Compression ratio 4–17.5 2

Max. power output 4 kW at 2800 rpm

0
Max. torque 28 N⋅m at 1600 rpm 0 20 40 60 80
Cooling type Water cooled Load (%)

No load speed range 500–3600 rpm 0% EER 10% EER

5% EER 15% EER
Load speed range 1200–3600 rpm
Figure 2: Effect of load on CO2 concentration.

where EER is ethanol energy ratio, EE is ethanol energy

content, and GE is gasoline energy content: 3. Results and Discussion
In this section, the experimental results of the effect of
EE = (mxLCV)eth ,
bioethanol addition to gasoline fuel on the pollutants emis-
(2)
sions of a spark ignition engine have been presented and
GE = (mxLCV)Gas .
discussed. It must be mentioned here that the ethanol
blending is based on energy replacement basis; see (1). The
The properties of the two blended fuels are shown in Table 2. experimental program is limited to a bioethanol blending
ratio ranging from 0% to 15% since at higher ratios the engine
2.3. Experimental Procedures. Tests are carried out at three does not run smoothly.
different engine speeds ranging from 1200 rpm to 2000 rpm,
by 400 rpm increments at various loads starting from no load 3.1. The Effect of Load. Carbon dioxide is product of complete
to 14 N⋅m and at four different compression ratios (7 : 1, 8 : 1, combustion of fuel. Normally, CO2 emission increases with
10 : 1, and 11 : 1). At each of these engine speeds, four different increase in load due to enhancement in combustion process
fuels are used which are neat unleaded gasoline (E0) and as seen from Figure 2. Further, the presence of alcohol
three bio-ethanol-blended gasoline, namely, E5, E10, and E15. provides more oxygen for burning of fuel thus the emission
The letter E refers to bioethanol while the followed number of CO2 increases with increasing the alcohol blending ratio.
refers to the percentage of bioethanol in the blended fuel. The stoichiometric air-fuel ratio of ethanol is about 2/3 that
For each experiment, the engine is allowed to reach a stable of gasoline; hence, the required amount of air for complete
condition and then the measurements are recorded. The full combustion of the blended fuel is reduced and the mixture
experimental program is shown in Table 3. becomes leaner. When the engine condition goes leaner, the
4 Journal of Renewable Energy

Table 3: The experimental program.

CR = 7, 8, 10, 11
1200 rpm 1600 rpm 2000 rpm
Torque (N⋅m) EER EER EER
0% 5% 10% 15% 0% 5% 10% 15% 0% 5% 10% 15%
0
3
7
10
14

12 1000
Speed: 1600 rpm
950
10 CR: 7
900
8
850
CO (%)

6 800
NOx (ppm)
4 750

700
2
650
0 600
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Load (%) 550

0% EER 10% EER 500

5% EER 15% EER 0 20 40 60 80
Load (%)
Figure 3: Effect of load on CO concentration.
0% EER 10% EER
5% EER 15% EER
250
Figure 5: Effect of load on NOx concentration.
200 Speed: 1600 rpm
CR: 7
UHC (ppm)

150
of ethanol makes the mixture leaner, which gives better
combustion and less CO production. The formation of carbon
100 monoxide indicates loss of power because of oxygen defi-
ciency in combustion chamber and hence incomplete com-
50 bustion. The UHC emission decreases with increasing load
and EER as shown in Figure 4, because increasing load results
0 in stable combustion processes and faster flame speed. This
0 20 40 60 80 is further improved by the addition of oxygenated alcohol. It
Load (%) provides more oxygen for the combustion process and leads
0% EER 10% EER
to the so-called “leaning effect.” Its final result is that better
5% EER 15% EER combustion is achieved therefore the concentration of UHC
emission decreases as the ethanol content increases. The NOx
Figure 4: Effect of load on UHC concentration. concentration results are very complicated. It depends on
combustion temperature, availability of oxygen, and time for
combustion process. The NOx increases as the EER increases
combustion process is more complete and the concentration and as the load increases as shown in Figure 5. This is due
of CO2 emission gets higher. to better combustion process, leading to higher combustion
The carbon monoxide concentration shows opposite temperature, which favors NOx formation. As load on engine
behavior as compared with carbon dioxide as shown in was increased, the NOx emissions for all blending ratios are
Figure 3. The carbon monoxide concentration decreases as also increased gradually. This is due to higher combustion
EER increases. This is because of the fact that addition temperature.
Journal of Renewable Energy 5

12 250
Torque 14 (N·m)
CR 8 : 1
10
200
8
CO2 (%)

UHC (ppm)
150
6

4 100
Torque 14 (N·m)
2 CR 8 : 1
50

0
0 5 10 15 20
0
EER (%) 0 5 10 15 20
EER (%)
1200 rpm
1600 rpm 1200 rpm
2000 rpm 1600 rpm
2000 rpm
Figure 6: Effect of speed on CO2 concentration.
Figure 8: Effect of speed on UHC concentration.
8
Torque 14 (N·m)
7 1200
CR 8 : 1
6
1000
5
CO (%)

800
4
NOx (ppm)

3 600
2
400 Torque 14 (N·m)
1 CR 8 : 1
0 200
0 5 10 15 20
EER (%)
0
1200 rpm 0 5 10 15 20
1600 rpm EER (%)
2000 rpm
1200 rpm
Figure 7: Effect of speed on CO concentration. 1600 rpm
2000 rpm

Figure 9: Effect of load on NOx concentration.

3.2. The Effect of Engine Speed. The carbon dioxide concen-
trations increase with increasing engine speed and EER while
the CO decreases. This is due to larger oxidation rate of fuel
carbon to CO2 which is caused by presence of extra oxygen higher temperature caused by better combustion process. The
when using ethanol blending. The increase in engine speed maximum level of NOx emission is obtained at maximum
improves engine volumetric efficiency and mixing process, speed and maximum EER which is about 1010 ppm.
leading to better combustion process. This leads to increasing
CO2 emissions and reducing CO emissions as shown in 3.3. Effect of Engine Compression Ratio. The results show
Figures 6 and 7. However, very high engine speed reduces that the concentration of CO2 decreases, Figure 10, while
volumetric efficiency which deteriorates combustion process. the concentrations of CO and UHC increase, Figures 11
The unburnt hydrocarbon emission shows the same trend as and 12, respectively, with increasing compression ratio for
CO since both are products of incomplete combustion of fuel; all EER values. The decreasing in CO2 concentration and
see Figure 8. the increasing in CO concentration may be due to the
Figure 9 shows that the concentration of NOx increases dissociation of CO2 at high combustion temperature caused
with increasing engine speed and EER at constant load due by increasing compression ratio and the presence of ethanol.
to the increase in the cylinder temperature. This is due to The increasing in UHC concentration may be caused by
6 Journal of Renewable Energy

10 450

400
8 350

300

UHC (ppm)
6
CO2 (%)

250

200
4
150

2 100

50
0 0
7 8 10 11 7 8 10 11
Compression ratio Compression ratio
0% EER 10% EER 0% EER 10% EER
5% EER 15% EER 5% EER 15% EER

Figure 10: Effect of compression ratio on CO2 concentration for Figure 12: Effect of compression ratio on UHC concentration for
different EER at 1200 rpm and load 14 N⋅m. different EER at 1200 rpm and load 14 N⋅m.

880
9 860
8 840
820
7
800
NOx (ppm)

6
780
CO (%)

5 760
4 740
3 720
700
2
680
1
660
0 7 8 10 11
7 8 10 11 Compression ratio
Compression ratio
0% EER 10% EER
0% EER 10% EER 5% EER 15% EER
5% EER 15% EER
Figure 13: Effect of compression ratio on NOx concentration for
Figure 11: Effect of compression ratio on CO concentration for different EER at 1200 rpm and load 14 N⋅m.
different EER at 1200 rpm and load 14 N⋅m.

4. Conclusions
the increasing of crevice volume ratio caused by increasing The main conclusions that can be drawn from the results and
compression ratio. discussions in the previous section are as follows.
The variation of NOx concentration is shown in Figure 13. (1) The concentrations of CO2 and NOx increase while
The figure shows that NOx concentration decreases slightly the concentrations of CO and UHC decrease as EER
at low compression ratios (7 and 8) for all values of EER increases.
while the decrease is more noticeable at higher compression
ratios as shown in Figure 13. This may be due to longer (2) Increasing engine load causes an increase in the CO2
expansion stroke which gives lower temperature at later and NOx emissions and a decrease in CO and UHC
stages of expansion stroke. emissions.
Figures 14 and 15 show a comparison of results of (3) It was observed that the emission values of CO2 and
present work with results of [15] for CO2 and CO emissions. NOx increase while those of CO and UHC decrease
Comparison shows acceptable agreement in trends. with increased speed of engine.
Journal of Renewable Energy 7

13 References
12
[1] S. H. Yoon and C. S. Lee, “Lean combustion and emission
11
characteristics of bioethanol and its blends in a spark ignition
10 (SI) engine,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3484–3492, 2011.
9 [2] Y. Zhuang and G. Hong, “Primary investigation to leveraging
8 effect of using ethanol fuel on reducing gasoline fuel consump-
CO2 (%)

7 tion,” Fuel, vol. 105, pp. 425–431, 2013.

6 [3] T. Beer and J. Carras, “The health impacts of ethanol blend
5 petrol,” Energies, no. 4, pp. 352–367, 2011.
4 [4] A. M. Francisco and R. G. Ahmad, “Performance and exhaust
3 emissions of a single cylinder utility engine using ethanol fuel,”
SAE Technical Paper 2006-32-0078, 2006.
2
[5] C. D. Marriott, M. A. Wiles, J. M. Gwidt, and S. E. Parrish,
1
“Development of a naturally aspirated spark ignition direct-
0 injection flex-fuel engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0319,
0 5 10 15 20
EER (%)
2008.
[6] S. H. Yoon, S. H. Park, and C. S. Lee, “Experimental investiga-
2000 rpm, 73.2% load, CR 10, tion on the fuel properties of biodiesel and its blends at various
energy replacement, present work temperatures,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 652–656, 2008.
2000 rpm, 75% load, CR 9, [7] S. Y. Liao, D. M. Jiang, Q. Cheng, Z. H. Huang, and Q. Wei,
volume replacement [15]
“Investigation of the cold-start combustion characteristics of
Figure 14: Comparison of present results with results of [15]. ethanol-gasoline blends in a constant-volume chamber,” Energy
and Fuels, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 813–819, 2005.
[8] G. Najafi, B. Ghobadian, T. Tavakoli, D. R. Buttsworth, T.
4
F. Yusaf, and M. Faizollahnejad, “Performance and exhaust
emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline
3.5
fuels using artificial neural network,” Applied Energy, vol. 86,
no. 5, pp. 630–639, 2009.
3 [9] T. Yusaf, D. Buttsworth, and G. Najafi, “Theoretical and exper-
imental investigation of SI engine performance and exhaust
2.5 emissions using ethanol-gasoline blended fuels,” in Proceedings
of ICEE 3rd International Conference on Energy and Environ-
CO (%)

2 ment, pp. 195–201, Malacca, Malaysia, December 2009.

[10] N. Seshaiah, “Efficiency and exhaust gas analysis of variable
1.5 compression ratio spark ignition engine fuelled with alternative
fuels,” International Journal of Energy and Environment, vol. 1,
1 no. 5, pp. 861–870, 2010.
[11] A. N. Ozsezen and M. Canakci, “Performance and combustion
0.5 characteristics of alcohol-gasoline blends at wide-open throt-
tle,” Energy, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 2747–2752, 2011.
0 [12] L. C. M. Sales and J. R. Sodré, “Cold start emissions of an
0 10 20
ethanol-fuelled engine with heated intake air and fuel,” Fuel, vol.
EER (%) 95, pp. 122–125, 2012.
2000 rpm, 73.2% load, CR 10, [13] H.-H. Yang, T.-C. Liu, C.-F. Chang, and E. Lee, “Effects of
energy replacement, present work ethanol-blended gasoline on emissions of regulated air pollu-
2000 rpm, 75% load, CR 9, tants and carbonyls from motorcycles,” Applied Energy, vol. 89,
volume replacement [15] no. 1, pp. 281–286, 2012.
[14] A. K. Ebraheem and A. K. S. Haroun, Production and analysis
Figure 15: Comparison of present results with results of [15].
of bio-ethanol from dates syrup [M.Sc. thesis], University of
Babylon, Hillah, Iraq, 2013.
[15] Y. Çaya, A. Çiçekb, F. Karac, and S. Sağiroğlua, “Prediction
of engine performance for an alternative fuel using artificial
(4) With increasing the compression ratio the concentra-
neural network,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 217–
tion values of the CO2 and NOx decrease while the
225, 2012.
concentration values of the CO and UHC increase.

Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Journal of Journal of International Journal of

Rotating
Energy Wind Energy Machinery

The Scientific Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation

World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Structures
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of Journal of
Industrial Engineering Petroleum Engineering

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of
Solar Energy
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com

Journal of

Fuels
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Engineering Photoenergy
Journal of  International Journal of
Advances in Advances in Journal of
Power Electronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
High Energy Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Combustion
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of Journal of

Nuclear Energy Renewable Energy

International Journal of

Aerospace
Advances in
Tribology
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Science and Technology of
Nuclear Installations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014