Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Rubrics For Affirmative Team Criteria 4 3 2 1 1. Organization &clarity

    Uploaded by

    Ronalyn Gatela Cajudo
    This document provides rubrics to evaluate the performance of affirmative and negative debate teams. Teams will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in four criteria: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of cross-examination and rebuttal, and presentation style. The highest performing teams will have clear and organized arguments, strong and persuasive reasons to support their position, excellent identification and rebuttal of weaknesses, and convincingly engaging presentation styles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubrics For Affirmative Team Criteria 4 3 2 1 1. Organization &clarity

    Uploaded by

    Ronalyn Gatela Cajudo
    30 views3 pages
    This document provides rubrics to evaluate the performance of affirmative and negative debate teams. Teams will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in four criteria: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of cross-examination and rebuttal, and presentation style. The highest performing teams will have clear and organized arguments, strong and persuasive reasons to support their position, excellent identification and rebuttal of weaknesses, and convincingly engaging presentation styles.

    Original Title

    Rubrics for DEBATE

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides rubrics to evaluate the performance of affirmative and negative debate teams. Teams will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in four criteria: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of cross-examination and rebuttal, and presentation style. The highest performing teams will have clear and organized arguments, strong and persuasive reasons to support their position, excellent identification and rebuttal of weaknesses, and convincingly engaging presentation styles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    30 views3 pages

    Rubrics For Affirmative Team Criteria 4 3 2 1 1. Organization &clarity

    Uploaded by

    Ronalyn Gatela Cajudo
    This document provides rubrics to evaluate the performance of affirmative and negative debate teams. Teams will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4 in four criteria: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of cross-examination and rebuttal, and presentation style. The highest performing teams will have clear and organized arguments, strong and persuasive reasons to support their position, excellent identification and rebuttal of weaknesses, and convincingly engaging presentation styles.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Rubrics for Affirmative Team

    Criteria 4 3 2 1 Grade:
    1. Organization Completely Mostly clear Clear in some Unclear and
    &Clarity: clear and and orderly in parts but not disorganized
    Main arguments and orderly all parts overall throughout
    responses are presentation
    outlined in a clear
    and orderly way.
    2. Use of Very strong Many good Some decent Few or no
    Argument: and arguments arguments, real
    Reasons are given to persuasive given, with but some arguments
    support the arguments only minor significant given, or all
    resolution given problems problems arguments
    throughout given had
    significant
    problems.
    3. Use of cross Excellent Good cross Decent cross Poor cross-
    examination and cross-exam exam and exam and/or exam or
    rebuttal: and defense rebuttals, rebuttals, but rebuttals,
    Identification of against with only with some failure to
    weakness in Negative minor slip- significant point out
    Negative team’s team’s ups problems problems in
    arguments and objections Negative
    ability to defend team’s
    itself against attack. position or
    failure to
    defend itself
    against
    attack.
    4. Presentation All style Most style Few style Very few
    Style: features were features were features were style features
    Tone of voice, used used used were used,
    clarity of expression, convincingly convincingly convincingly none of them
    precision of convincingly
    arguments all
    contribute to
    keeping audience’s
    attention and
    persuading them of
    the team’s case.
    Total score:

    (Divide by 4)
    Average for Affirmative Team: ________
    _____________________________________
    Rubrics for Negative Team

    Criteria 4 3 2 1 Grade:
    1. Organization Completely Mostly clear Clear in some Unclear and
    &Clarity: clear and and orderly in parts but not disorganized
    Main arguments and orderly all parts overall throughout
    responses are presentation
    outlined in a clear
    and orderly way.
    2. Use of Very strong Many good Some decent Few or no real
    Argument: and arguments arguments, arguments
    Reasons are given persuasive given, with but some given, or all
    against the arguments only minor significant arguments
    resolution given problems problems given had
    throughout significant
    problems.
    3. Use of cross Excellent Good cross Decent cross Poor cross-
    examination and cross-exam exam and exam and/or exam or
    rebuttal: and defense rebuttals, rebuttals, but rebuttals,
    Identification of against with only with some failure to point
    weakness in Affirmative minor slip- significant out problems
    Affirmative team’s team’s ups problems in Negative
    arguments and objections team’s position
    ability to defend or failure to
    itself against attack. defend itself
    against attack.
    4. Presentation All style Most style Few style Very few style
    Style: features were features were features were features were
    Tone of voice, used used used used, none of
    clarity of expression, convincingly convincingly convincingly them
    precision of convincingly
    arguments all
    contribute to
    keeping audience’s
    attention and
    persuading them of
    the team’s case.
    Total
    score:

    (Divide by 4)
    Average for Negative Team: ________
    _____________________________________

    You might also like