Week 4
Week 4
Week 4
𝛿𝑄
∆𝑆 = ∫ + 𝑆𝑔𝑒𝑛
𝑇
But from Tds relations (Gibbs equations), the change of entropy can be
determined by a method does not depend on the process path. It depends
on the initial and final states.
𝑑𝑢 𝑃𝑑𝑣
𝑑𝑠 = +
𝑇 𝑇
𝑑ℎ 𝑣𝑑𝑃
𝑑𝑠 = −
𝑇 𝑇
2 2 𝑑𝑢 2 𝑃𝑑𝑣
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ +∫
1 1 𝑇 1 𝑇
2 22
𝑑ℎ 𝑣𝑑𝑃
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ −∫
1 1 𝑇 1 𝑇
To perform the integrations, the relations of (u-T), (h, T) and (P-v-T)
must be known.
The relations of (u-T), (h, T) and (P-v-T) are very complicated. The
above integrations were performed and the results given in tables and
charts.
∆𝑠 = 𝑚(𝑠2 − 𝑠1)
The isentropic process is the int. rev. adiabatic process. It is the ideal
process for many devices that operates adiabatically such as turbine and
nozzle.
𝑠2 = 𝑠1
Case study: Determination of ∆𝑺
Solution
We take the refrigerant in the tank as the system. This is a closed system
since no mass crosses the system boundary during the process.
State 1
P1=140 kPa
T1=20oC
State 2
𝑣2 = 𝑣𝑓 + 𝑥2 (𝑣𝑔 − 𝑣𝑓 )
𝑥2 = 0.859
𝑢2 = 𝑢𝑓 + 𝑥2 (𝑢𝑔 − 𝑢𝑓 ) =
𝑄12 +𝑣𝑒
∆𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟 = =
𝑇𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟 𝑇𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑟
Solution
The inlet state is completely specified since two properties are given. But
only one property (pressure) is given at the final state, and we need one
more property to fix it. The second property comes from the observation
that the process is reversible and adiabatic, and thus isentropic. Therefore,
s2 = s1, and
State 1:
Tsat@P1=
sf@P2= sg@P2=
𝑞12 − 𝑤12 = ℎ2 − ℎ1
Then, the work output of the turbine per unit mass of the steam becomes
2 2 2
𝑑𝑢 𝑃𝑑𝑣
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ +∫
1 1 𝑇 1 𝑇
2 2 2
𝑑ℎ 𝑣𝑑𝑃
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ −∫
1 1 𝑇 1 𝑇
2
2 𝐶 (𝑇 )𝑑𝑇 2 𝑑𝑣 2 𝐶 (𝑇 )𝑑𝑇 𝑣2
𝑣 𝑣
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ +∫ 𝑅 =∫ + 𝑅 𝑙𝑛
1 𝑇 1 𝑣 1 𝑇 𝑣1
1
2
2 𝐶 (𝑇)𝑑𝑇 2 2 𝐶 (𝑇)𝑑𝑇
𝑝 𝑑𝑃 𝑝 𝑃2
∆𝑠 = ∫ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫ −∫ 𝑅 =∫ − 𝑅 𝑙𝑛
1 𝑇 1 𝑃 1 𝑇 𝑃1
1
The specific heats are considered constant and equal their values at the
average temperature Tav between the temperatures T1 and T2 as shown in
the figure.
𝑇2 𝑣2
∆𝑠 = 𝐶𝑣 𝑎𝑣 𝑙𝑛 + 𝑅 𝑙𝑛 (𝑘𝑗/𝑘𝑔.K)
𝑇1 𝑣1
𝑇2 𝑃2
∆𝑠 = 𝐶𝑝 𝑎𝑣 𝑙𝑛 − 𝑅 𝑙𝑛 (𝑘𝑗/𝑘𝑔.K)
𝑇1 𝑃1
Variable Specific Heat method (Exact method)
𝑇 𝐶𝑝 (𝑇)𝑑𝑇
We can deal with the integration ∫𝑇 2 as follow:
1 𝑇
The exact function of 𝐶𝑝 (𝑇) is used and the results are given in the ideal
𝑇 𝐶𝑝 (𝑇)𝑑𝑇
gas table as 𝑠 𝑜 = ∫0 where 𝑠2𝑜 is the value of 𝑠 𝑜 at T2 and 𝑠1𝑜 is the
𝑇
𝑃2
∆𝑠 = (𝑠2𝑜 − 𝑠1𝑜 ) − 𝑅 𝑙𝑛 (𝑘𝑗/𝑘𝑔.K)
𝑃1
Case study
Solution
𝑃2
∆𝑠 = (𝑠2𝑜 − 𝑠1𝑜 ) − 𝑅 𝑙𝑛
𝑃1
From the ideal gas table (TA17), read values of 𝑠2𝑜 at T2=330 K and 𝑠1𝑜 at
T1=290 K and substitute in the equation
600
∆𝑠 = (1.79783 − 1.66802) − 0.287 𝑙𝑛
100
∆𝑠 = − 0.3844 𝑘𝐽/𝑘𝑔 · 𝐾
𝑇2 𝑃2
∆𝑠 = 𝐶𝑝 𝑎𝑣 𝑙𝑛 − 𝑅 𝑙𝑛
𝑇1 𝑃1
330 600
∆𝑠 = 1.006 𝑙𝑛 − 0.287 𝑙𝑛
290 100
∆𝑠 = − 0.3842 𝑘𝐽/𝑘𝑔 · 𝐾
Isentropic process for ideal gases
The isentropic relations for ideal gases are obtained by setting ∆𝑠 (using
variable specific heat) equal to zero.
𝑃 𝑃𝑟2
( 2) = #
𝑃1 𝑠=𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑃𝑟1
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑠𝑜 ⁄𝑅 )
𝑣 𝑣𝑟2
( 2) = #
𝑣1 𝑠=𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑣𝑟1
Summary
𝑃 𝑃𝑟2 𝑣 𝑣𝑟2
Equations of ( 2) = , and ( 2) = are strictly
𝑃1 𝑠=𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑃𝑟1 𝑣1 𝑠=𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑣𝑟1
valid for isentropic processes of ideal gases only. They account for the
variation of specific heats with temperature and therefore give more
𝑘𝑎𝑣 −1
𝑇2 𝑃2 𝑘𝑎𝑣 𝑣 𝑘𝑎𝑣 −1
accurate results than =( ) = ( 1) which are used for
𝑇1 𝑃1 𝑣2
Solution
This process is easily recognized as being isentropic
since it is both reversible and adiabatic. The problem
can be solved by:
𝑉2 𝑣2 1
For closed system = =
𝑉1 𝑣1 8
Power cycles are the cycles of the heat engines, the cycles which heat
engines operate.
Power cycles can also be categorized by another way: closed and open
cycles. In closed cycles, the working fluid is returned to the initial state at
the end of the cycle and is
recirculated (such as the steam-
power plant). In open cycles, the
working fluid is renewed at the end of
each cycle instead of being
recirculated. In automobile engines,
the combustion gases are exhausted
Gas-Power Cycles
Air-standard assumptions
The gas power cycles are open-loop cycles; they
give heat engines that are internal combustion
engines. The actual gas power cycles are rather
complex. To simplify the analysis, we use the
following approximations, commonly known as the
air-standard assumptions:
1- The working fluid is air, which circulates in a
closed loop and always behaves as an ideal gas.
2- All the processes that make up the cycle are
internally reversible.
3- The combustion process is replaced by a heat-addition process from an
external source as shown.
4- The exhaust process is replaced by a heat-rejection process that
restores the working fluid to its initial state.
Energy analysis:
𝑞23 − 𝑤23 = 𝑢3 − 𝑢2
𝑤23 = 0, (𝑣 = 𝑐)
𝑞41 − 𝑤41 = 𝑢1 − 𝑢4
𝑤41 = 0, (𝑣 = 𝑐)
Then the thermal efficiency of the ideal Otto cycle under the cold air
standard-assumptions becomes,
𝑇2 𝑣 𝑘−1
Process 1-2 is isentropic, = ( 1) = (𝑟)𝑘−1 (1)
𝑇1 𝑣2
𝑇3 𝑣 𝑘−1
Process 3-4 is isentropic, = ( 4) = (𝑟)𝑘−1 (2)
𝑇4 𝑣3
𝑇2 𝑇3 𝑇3 𝑇4
From (1), (2) = → =
𝑇1 𝑇4 𝑇2 𝑇1
𝑇 1
th= 1 − 𝑇1 = 1 − (𝑟)𝑘−1
2
1
th, otto= 1 − (𝑟)𝑘−1 #
The equation shows that under the cold-air-standard assumptions, the
thermal efficiency of an ideal Otto cycle depends on the compression
ratio (𝑟) of the engine and the specific
heat ratio (𝑘 ) of the working fluid. The
thermal efficiency of the ideal Otto cycle
increases with both the compression ratio
and the specific heat ratio. This is also
true for actual spark-ignition internal
combustion engines. A plot of thermal
efficiency versus the compression ratio is
shown for k = 1.4, which is the specific
heat ratio value of air at room
temperature.
Also, when high compression ratios are used, the temperature of the air–
fuel mixture rises above the auto-ignition temperature of the fuel (the
temperature at which the fuel ignites without
the help of a spark) during the combustion
process, causing an early and rapid burn of the
fuel at some point or points ahead of the flame
front, followed by almost instantaneous
inflammation of the end gas. This premature
ignition of the fuel, called self-ignition,
produces an audible noise, which is called
engine knock. Auto-ignition in spark-ignition
engines cannot be tolerated because it hurts
performance and can cause engine damage.
Improvement of the thermal efficiency of gasoline engines by utilizing
higher compression ratios (up to about 12) without facing the auto-
ignition problem has been made possible by using gasoline blends that
have good antiknock characteristics, such as gasoline mixed with
tetraethyl lead. It is an inexpensive method of raising the octane rating,
which is a measure of the engine knock resistance of a fuel. Leaded
gasoline, however, has a very undesirable side effect to health and
pollutes the environment. The ready availability of high octane fuels
made it possible to raise the compression ratios again in recent years.
Also, owing to the improvements in other areas (reduction in overall
automobile weight, improved aerodynamic design, etc.), today’s cars
have better fuel economy and consequently get more miles per gallon of
fuel. The second parameter affecting the thermal efficiency of an ideal
Otto cycle is the specific heat ratio k. For a given compression ratio, an
ideal Otto cycle using a monatomic gas (such as argon or helium, k =
1.667) as the working fluid will have the highest thermal efficiency. The
specific heat ratio k, and thus the thermal efficiency of the ideal Otto
cycle, decreases as the molecules of the working fluid get larger. At room
temperature it is 1.4 for air, 1.3 for carbon dioxide, and 1.2 for ethane.
The working fluid in actual engines contains larger molecules such as
carbon dioxide, and the specific heat ratio decreases with temperature,
which is one of the reasons that the actual cycles have lower thermal
efficiencies than the ideal Otto cycle. The thermal efficiencies of actual
spark-ignition engines range from about 25 to 30 percent.
Case study
Solution
𝑣𝑟2 𝑣2 1 1
= = =
𝑣𝑟1 𝑣1 𝑟 8
606.7
𝑣𝑟2 = = 84.51 → 𝑇2 = 652.4 𝐾, 𝑢2
8
= 475.11 𝑘𝑗/𝑘𝑔
𝑃1 𝑣1 𝑃2𝑣2
𝑅= =
𝑇1 𝑇2
𝑇2 𝑣1 652.4
𝑃2 = 𝑃1 ( ) ( ) = 100 ( ) (8) = 1799.9 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑇1 𝑣2 290
𝑞𝑖𝑛 = 𝑢3 − 𝑢2
800 = 𝑢3 − 475.11
𝑃3𝑣3 𝑃2𝑣2
𝑅= =
𝑇3 𝑇2
𝑇3 𝑣2 1575.1
𝑃3 = 𝑃2 ( ) ( ) = 1799.9 ( ) (1) = 4345 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑇2 𝑣3 652.4
𝑣𝑟4 𝑣4
= =𝑟=8
𝑣𝑟3 𝑣3
𝑞41 = 𝑢1 − 𝑢4
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 418.17
th, otto= 𝑞𝑖𝑛
=
800
= 0.523 = 52.3 %
𝑃1𝑣1 = 𝑅𝑇1
𝑅𝑇1 0.287(290)
𝑣1 = = = 0.8323 𝑚3⁄𝑘𝑔
𝑃1 100
𝑣1 0.8323
𝑣2 = = = 0.104 𝑚3⁄𝑘𝑔
𝑟 8
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 418.17
𝑀𝐸𝑃 = = = 574 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑣1 − 𝑣2 0.8323 − 0.104
𝑉𝑑 0.0016
𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑟 = = = 0.001922 𝑘𝑔
𝑣1 0.8323
2000
𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 = 0.8037 ( ) = 26.8 𝑘𝑗⁄𝑠 = 26.8𝑘𝑊
60
- Using constant specific heat method:
𝑇2 𝑣1 𝑘−1
=( ) = (𝑟)𝑘−1 = (8)1.4−1 = (8)0.4
𝑇1 𝑣2
𝑇2 = 290(8)0.4 = 666.24 𝐾
𝑃1 𝑣1 𝑃2 𝑣2
𝑅= =
𝑇1 𝑇2
𝑇2 𝑣1 666.24
𝑃2 = 𝑃1 ( ) ( ) = 100 ( ) (8)
𝑇1 𝑣2 290
= 1837.9 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑞𝑖𝑛 = 𝑢3 − 𝑢2
𝑇3 = 1780.4 𝐾
𝑃3𝑣3 𝑃2𝑣2
𝑅= =
𝑇3 𝑇2
𝑇3 𝑣2 1780.4
𝑃3 = 𝑃2 ( ) ( ) = 1837.9 ( ) (1) = 4911.4 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑇2 𝑣3 666.24
𝑇3 𝑣4 𝑘−1
=( ) = (𝑟)𝑘−1 = (8)1.4−1 = (8)0.4
𝑇4 𝑣3
𝑇3 1780.4
𝑇4 = = = 774.96 𝐾
(8)0.4 (8)0.4
Prcess 4-1 is (const. vol. heat rejection),
𝑞41 = 𝑢1 − 𝑢4
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 451.8
th, otto= 𝑞𝑛𝑒𝑡
=
800
= 0.5647 = 56.47 %
𝑃1𝑣1 = 𝑅𝑇1
𝑅𝑇1 0.287(290)
𝑣1 = = = 0.8323 𝑚3⁄𝑘𝑔
𝑃1 100
𝑣1 0.8323
𝑣2 = = = 0.104 𝑚3⁄𝑘𝑔
𝑟 8
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 451.8
𝑀𝐸𝑃 = = = 620.6 𝑘𝑃𝑎 #
𝑣1 − 𝑣2 0.8323 − 0.104
𝑉𝑑 0.0016
𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑟 = = = 0.001922 𝑘𝑔
𝑣1 0.8323
Total work net,
2000
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 = 0.86835 ( ) = 28.94 𝑘𝑗⁄𝑠 = 28.94 𝑘𝑊 #
60