A Practical Guide To Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Qualitative Research Psychology
A Practical Guide To Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Qualitative Research Psychology
A Practical Guide To Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Qualitative Research Psychology
net/publication/263767248
CITATIONS READS
992 53,241
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Qualitative analysis of phenomena and symptoms associated with possession View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Igor Pietkiewicz on 22 April 2015.
DOI: 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
Jonathan A. Smith
Birkbeck University of London, Department of Psychological Sciences
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) has become a popular methodological framework in qualitative
psychology. Studies based in IPA focus on examining how individuals make meaning of their life experiences.
A detailed analysis of personal accounts followed by presenting and discussing the generic experiential themes
is typically paired with the researcher’s own interpretation, which is an expression of double hermeneutics in
practice. IPA draws upon phenomenology, hermeneutics, and idiography. This paper presents fundamental
principles behind IPA and offers guidelines for doing a study based on this framework.
Key words: qualitative research methodology, interpretative phenomenological analysis, qualitative psychology
QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGY FRAMEWORKS tive studies are generally more concerned with counting
IN PSYCHOLOGY occurrences, volumes, or the size of associations between
entities (which require the reduction of phenomena to
For many decades, the mainstream experimental psy- numerical values in order to carry out statistical analy-
chology relied on quantitative methodology based on ses), a great deal of qualitative research aims to provide
a model which involved testing theories by deriving rich descriptive accounts of the phenomenon under in-
hypotheses from them, which could then be checked in vestigation. In qualitative research, data is usually col-
practice via an experiment or observation. The research- lected in naturalistic settings (at home, school, hospi-
er looked for disconfirmation (falsification) of theory and, tal). Both participants’ and researchers’ interpretations
by eliminating claims which were not true, he or she was of phenomena is taken into account in the process of
believed to move closer to the truth. In contrast to this analysis. An important part of qualitative methodology
approach, we have observed a growing development of is epistemological reflexivity, which refers to questions
qualitative research methodologies1, based on a different such as: How does the research question define and limit
epistemological view. Qualitative researchers are main- what can be found? How does study design and method
ly concerned with meaning (e.g., how individuals make of analysis affect data and its analysis? If the research
sense of the world, how they experience events, what problem were defined differently, how would this affect
meaning they attribute to phenomena). In other words, the understanding of the phenomenon under investiga-
they are more preoccupied with the quality of experi- tion? (Willig, 2008).
ence, rather than causal relationships. While quantita- Handbooks on qualitative methodology in psychology
usually describe a number of major methodological ap-
1
Silverman (1993, p. 1) explains the difference between proaches, such as the Grounded Theory, Phenomenol-
“methodology” and “method”: whereas the former refers to ogy, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Psychology, Partici-
‘a general approach to studying research topics’, the latter
denotes ‘a specific research technique’ (such as an in-depth
patory Action Research (Smith 2008; Willig 2008; Camic,
interview, focus group, participatory observation). Rhodes & Yardley 2003). Each type constitutes a com-
* Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to This is an English version reprint of the paper: Pietkiewicz, I.
Igor Pietkiewicz, University of Social Sciences & Humanities & Smith, J.A. (2012). Praktyczny przewodnik interpretacyjnej
Faculty of Psychology in Katowice, Techników 9, 40-326 Kato- analizy fenomenologicznej w badaniach jakościowych w psycho-
wice, Poland. [email protected] logii. Czasopismo Psychologiczne 18, 2, 361-369.
prehensive framework which includes the theoretical of their subject (although recognizing this is never com-
underpinnings behind it and guidelines for research de- pletely possible) and, through interpretative activity,
sign (sampling, methods of data collection and analysis). make meaning comprehensible by translating it (just
When producing the final report (or a research paper), like the mythological Hermes translated the gods’ mes-
it is especially convenient to use an established meth- sages to humans). This means that the IPA study is
odological framework. This is valuable, as most journals a dynamic process with the active role of the researcher
impose limitations on paper lengths. The researcher can who influences the extent to which they get access to the
make reference to standardized methods and methodolo- participant’s experience and how, through interpretative
gies, instead of giving detailed descriptions of analytical activity, they make sense of the subject’s personal world.
procedures. This allows more space to present abundant The analytical process in IPA is often described in terms
qualitative material. In this paper, we describe one such of a double hermeneutic or dual interpretation process
methodological framework which has become increas- because, firstly, the participants make meaning of their
ingly popular in European and American psychology, world and, secondly, the researcher tries to decode that
namely Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). meaning to make sense of the participants’ meaning
After a short outline of its theoretical orientation, we de- making (Smith & Osborn, 2008). In other words, IPA re-
scribe the specifics of research problems suitable for IPA, searchers try to understand what an experience (object
methods of sampling and data collection, and present or event) is like from the participant’s perspective. Yet,
guidelines for analysis using examples, and final com- at the same time, they try to formulate critical questions
ments on how to produce a final paper. For the reader referring to the material, such as: What is the person
who is interested, a much fuller treatment of these is- trying to achieve here? Is anything meaningful being
sues can be found in the book on IPA (Smith, Flowers, said here, which was not intended? Do I have a sense
& Larkin 2009). of something going on here that the person himself or
herself is perhaps less aware of? IPA studies may thus
IPA THEORETICAL ORIENTATION contain elements of both types of interpretation, making
the analysis richer and more comprehensive.
The primary goal of IPA researchers is to investigate To sum up, IPA synthesizes ideas from phenomenol-
how individuals make sense of their experiences. It is ogy and hermeneutics resulting in a method which is de-
assumed that people are ‘self-interpreting beings’ (Tay- scriptive because it is concerned with how things appear
lor, 1985), which means that they are actively engaged and letting things speak for themselves, and interpreta-
in interpreting the events, objects, and people in their tive because it recognizes there is no such thing as an
lives. To examine this process, IPA draws upon the fun- uninterpreted phenomenon.
damental principles of phenomenology, hermeneutics, The third theoretical orientation which IPA relies
and idiography. upon is idiography. This refers to an in-depth analysis
Phenomenology, developed by Edmund Husserl as an of single cases and examining individual perspectives of
eidetic method, is concerned with attending to the way study participants in their unique contexts. The funda-
things appear to individuals in their experience. In other mental principle behind the idiographic approach is to
words, it aims at identifying the essential components explore every single case, before producing any general
of phenomena or experiences which make them unique statements. This contrasts with the nomothetic princi-
or distinguishable from others. By the use of eidetic re- ples which underlie most empirical work in psychology,
duction, phenomenologists try to recognize what essen- in which groups and populations are studied to establish
tial components make a given phenomenon special (or the probability that certain phenomena will occur un-
unique). Phenomenological studies thus focus on how der specific conditions. IPA relies on idiography, mean-
people perceive and talk about objects and events, rather ing that researchers focus on the particular rather the
than describing phenomena according to a predeter- universal (Smith, Harré, & Van Langenhove, 1995). The
mined categorical system, conceptual and scientific cri- researcher can make specific statements about study
teria. This involves ‘bracketing’ one’s preconceptions and participants because the analysis is based upon a de-
allowing phenomena to speak for themselves. tailed case exploration. The IPA researcher thus starts
Husserl’s thought was further developed by his fol- either by examining an individual and producing a case
lower, Martin Heidegger (1962), into existential philoso- study or moves to an equally attentive exploration of the
phy and hermeneutics. Heidegger was concerned with second case, and so on. This idiographic commitment is
the ontological question of existence itself. According to unusual even among qualitative methodologies. If the
hermeneutics (from the Greek word ‘to interpret’ or ‘to researcher wants to study a group of individuals, he or
make clear’) one needs to comprehend the mind-set of she moves between important themes generated in the
a person and their language which mediates one’s ex- analysis and exemplifies them with individual narra-
periences of the world, in order to translate his or her tives (how particular individuals tell their stories), com-
message (Freeman, 2008). Thus, IPA researchers at- paring and contrasting them (i.e., showing similarities
tempt to understand what it is like to stand in the shoes and differences).
Frame 1:
Example interview questions for a study on illness behaviors in an ethnic minority group. The researcher’s goal was to examine how
the indigenous culture and acculturation in northern India affected Tibetan patients’ explanatory models and reactions to becoming ill
1. Can you tell me about your illness experiences when living in exile?
Prompts: What kind of health problems did you have? How did that feel in your body? How did you interpret symptoms? Why do you think
symptoms appeared at that time of your life? What was going on in your mind then? (thoughts/ associations/ fantasies)
2. What did you think could help you feel better at that time?
Prompts: What kind of treatment did you think was most appropriate? Why? What did you think should have been done to help you
overcome your problem(s)? How did you think your condition would change if you had done nothing about it?
3. What was your first / subsequent reaction(s)?
Prompts: How did you decide to go about your health problems? Where did you seek help? What stopped you from seeking help? If sought
medical / non-medical treatment: What did you think about recommendations you received? What was similar or different in what you
thought about your problem and how the person you referred to assessed it?
with the theoretical underpinnings of IPA, participants It is crucial that researchers have developed their in-
are selected purposely. This allows one to find a defined terviewing skills. Apart from mastering active listening2
group for whom the research problem has relevance and and the ability to ask open-ended questions free from
personal significance. How homogeneous the group is de- hidden presumptions, the interviewer should know to
pends on two factors: 1. interpretative concerns (degree build rapport and gain trust of the participant. A kind
of similarity or variation that can be contained in the of warm-up discussion may be necessary to reduce the
analysis of the phenomenon), and 2. pragmatic consider- interviewee’s tension and get him or her ready to discuss
ations (ease or difficulty of contacting potential partici- more sensitive or personal issues. With semi-structured
pants, relative rarity of the phenomenon). The subject interviews, it is helpful to prepare an interview plan
matter can itself define the boundaries of the relevant in advance. This plan is a guide to facilitate a natural
sample (e.g., if the topic is rare and few representatives flow of conversation, and can include key questions or
are available, such as the Juvenile Huntington’s Disease areas the researcher wants to discuss (see example in
mentioned earlier). In other cases, when the topic is more Frame 1). Formulating specific questions (e.g., relating
commonplace, the sample may include individuals with to sensitive issues) may be helpful for less experienced
similar demographic or socio-economic status profiles interviewers. Apart from open and expansive questions
(e.g., elderly, female members of a specific religious com- which encourage participants to talk at length, it may be
munity or young, male patients diagnosed with a par- also be convenient to think about prompts. These may be
ticular illness, etc.). In this respect, IPA can be compared helpful if participants find some questions too general or
to ethnographic studies in which small communities are abstract. Questions suitable for an IPA study may con-
closely investigated to produce detailed descriptions and centrate on exploring sensory perceptions, mental phe-
commentaries about their culture, where claims are nomena (thoughts, memories, associations, fantasies)
bound to that culture or only cautiously suggested at and, in particular, individual interpretations. During an
a broader level. Nevertheless, through a steady accumu- interview, the researcher should also feel comfortable
lation of similar studies on other groups, generalizations with moments of silence, to allow both his or herself and
may become possible over time (Smith, Harré, & Van the participant to reflect upon issues being discussed.
Langenhove, 1995). Furthermore, an experienced interviewer is also sensi-
tive to and tries to be aware of all verbal, non-verbal, and
COLLECTING DATA non-behavioral communication. (Frame 1)
For ethical reasons, and because IPA studies are fre-
The primary concern of IPA researchers is to elicit rich, quently concerned with significant existential issues, it
detailed, and first-person accounts of experiences and is crucial that the interviewer monitors how the inter-
phenomena under investigation. Semi-structured, in- view is affecting the participant. Experienced interview-
depth, one-on-one interviews are the most popular meth- ers can easily determine when the participants avoid
od to achieve that, although other alternatives of data talking about certain issues, start feeling awkward,
collection can also be used (e.g., diaries, focus groups, let- ashamed or become very emotional. Using counseling
ters or chat dialogues). Semi-structured interviews allow skills may then be useful and, if the interviewer has not
the researcher and the participant to engage in a dia- developed such competence, he or she should follow spe-
logue in real time. They also give enough space and flex-
ibility for original and unexpected issues to arise, which 2
This involves listening attentively, trying to understand
the researcher may investigate in more detail with fur- what is being said, negotiating meaning when things seem
ther questions. unclear, ambiguous or abstract, and constructing appropri-
ate questions which help explore what is being said.
cific ethical procedures (e.g., stop the interview and refer data through a psychological lens, interpreting it with
the person to a professional in mental care). Even though the application of psychological concepts and theories
such situations are rare, researchers should consider all which the researcher finds helpful to illuminate the un-
possible risks. derstanding of research problems. Showing the emic per-
The duration of most IPA interviews is one hour or spective protects researchers from psychological or psy-
longer. The semi-structured form of interviews allows chiatric reductionism. On the other hand, by looking at
the interviewer to ask questions in a convenient order, data from the outsider’s perspective, we have a chance to
which may differ from one interview to another. Novel develop higher level theories and insights (which the re-
perspectives or topics, which have not been anticipat- spondent himself or herself may not have access to). The
ed, may also arise and the researcher is free to develop researcher should be careful, however, when applying
them. In IPA it is necessary to audio record the interview theories developed in one setting (e.g., western culture)
and produce a verbatim transcription of it. to explain phenomena from a different one. Indigenous
psychologists stipulate that such theories might be ir-
ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITATIVE MATERIAL relevant.
In general, IPA provides a set of flexible guidelines
Analysing qualitative material using the IPA framework which can be adapted by individual researchers accord-
can be an inspiring activity, although complex and time- ing to their research objectives. However, these guide-
consuming. It is recommended that researchers totally lines are merely an illustration of one possible way of
immerse themselves in the data or, in other words, try analysing the qualitative material. They should not be
to step into the participants’ shoes as far as possible. treated as a recipe and the researcher is advised to be
IPA aims at giving evidence of the participants’ mak- flexible and creative in his or her thinking. To demon-
ing sense of phenomena under investigation and, at the strate how the analysis unfolds, we describe the analytic
same time, document the researcher’s sense making. stages of an example study on how Tibetans accultur-
The researcher thus moves between the emic and etic ating in northern India make meaning of their medical
perspectives. The latter is achieved by looking at the conditions.
Frame 2:
An extract from an interview with Lobsang (a Tibetan from Dharamsala) about making meaning of his symptoms, with researcher’s
notes
Multiple reading and making notes tailed and comprehensive notes have been produced at
an earlier stage, they should reflect the source material.
The initial stage involves close reading of the transcript The aim is to transform notes into emerging themes.
a number of times. If an audio recording is available, it is The researcher aims to formulate a concise phrase at
also recommended to listen to it a few times. This helps a slightly higher level of abstraction which may refer to
researchers immerse themselves in the data, recall the a more psychological conceptualization. Nevertheless,
atmosphere of the interview, and the setting in which this is still grounded in the particular detail of the par-
it was conducted. Each reading and listening to the re- ticipant’s account. At this stage, we are inevitably in-
cording may provide some new insights. At this stage, fluenced by having already annotated the transcript as
the researcher can make notes about his or her observa- a whole, which is a good example of the hermeneutic
tions and reflections about the interview experience or circle discussed earlier (the part is interpreted in rela-
any other thoughts and comments of potential signifi- tion to the whole, and the whole is interpreted in relation
cance. They may focus on content (what is actually being to the part). Frame 3 shows examples of the emergent
discussed), language use (features such as metaphors, themes for the same interview extract with Lobsang.
symbols, repetitions, pauses), context, and initial inter-
pretative comments. Some comments associated with Seeking relationships and clustering themes
personal reflexivity may also be generated (e.g., how
might personal characteristics of the interviewer, such The next stage involves looking for connections between
as gender, age, social status, affect the rapport with the emerging themes, grouping them together according to
participant). It is useful to highlight distinctive phrases conceptual similarities, and providing each cluster with
and emotional responses. An example of relevant notes a descriptive label. In practice, it means compiling themes
is shown in Frame 2. for the whole transcript before looking for connections
and clusters. Some of the themes may be dropped at this
Transforming notes into Emergent Themes stage if they do not fit well with the emerging structure
or because they have a weak evidential base. A final list
At this stage, the researcher should work more with his may comprise of numerous superordinate themes and
or her notes, rather than with the transcript. When de- subthemes (see: Frame 4). Researchers who use the tra-
Frame 3:
Examples of developing emergent themes
Frame 5:
A brief ilustration of writing up an IPA study
Trying to rationalize the onset of his illness, Lobsang initially referred to the traditional indigenous beliefs of the culture he represented:
I thought that it was the curse of nagas. These serpent deities are very powerful beings, you know, so you have to… you know, be careful
not to offend them. Sometimes, they… you can see them in the form of a frog or snake. They live in forests, in streams or in a tree. So, you
know… when you pee into the stream or on that tree… or cut this tree, you can make them angry and they curse you.
Stories about serpent deities have been part of everyday life and social discourse in the Tibetan diaspora. They were embedded in their
cosmological system and reflected the belief in the invisible sphere of existence, inhabited by gods, demi-gods, spirits or hungry ghosts. This
defined Lobsang’s spirituality and his sense of identity. This also represents shared values Lobsang identified with, such as respect towards
nature and all living creation. Yet, in another part of his discourse, Lobsang refers to fundamental principles of tantric Buddhism according to
which all phenomena are perceived as “mere reflections of the mind”. As such, serpent deities, powerful, dangerous, and potentially oppressive
for those who cross the taboo, can represent inner objects which are projected and used to control the behavior of body, speech, and mind.
Peeing into the stream or cutting a tree which belongs to the nagas carries significant symbolic force…