Roman Art PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 33

Roman Art

ROMAN SCULPTURE

Dispute over the authenticity of Roman style

Adaptations of Greek models at every stage

What was the natural trend of Roman Sculptures?


Nature and Trends -

A tremendous demand for sculptures caused


a fair amount of production.

A good deal of it was the study of antiques.

Attributed to antiquarianism or copy of the


sculptures of the past

Meet with the taste of interior decoration.

A consistent trend, of portraiture and


narrative relief sculpture, deeply rooted to
the Roman society.

Both these art trends had an important


Queen Matidia
function in the Roman society.
Unfortunately the first four hundred years of this Roman tradition is a closed
book as not a single roman portrait has been found yet that can be dated
before the first century BC.
Tradition derived from the Greek custom of placing votive statues of athletic
victors and other important individuals in the sanctuaries of Delphi and
Olympia.

Like the Hellenistic heads, Roman portraits deal with the Psychological aspects
and display certain characteristic feature that unable us to read the mind or
thought of the character portrayed
Use of Allegories and symbols Augustus

Statues of meritorious political and military leaders put on public display.


There was a Roman custom of considerable
antiquity; At the death of the head of the
family, a waxen image was made of his face,
which was then preserved in a special shrine or
family alter. At funerals these ancestral images
were carried in the procession. We can see the
roots of this kind of ancestor worship in
primitive societies.
Emphasis on intrinsic detail.

May strike at first glance as detailed


record of facial topography

The wrinkles true to life

Displays Roman personality – stern,


rugged, iron-willed in their devotion
to duty

Impressive head, a copy of the lost


original made of wax

Desired to duplicate wax models in


marble considering the longevity of
the medium

Portrait of a Roman, 80BC


IMPERIAL PROCESSION, 13c.BC, 63 in.
Propagandistic tendency in art

Objective showing the permanence of peace and order under the new dynasty

A great concern with spatial depth.

Softening of the relief background with partly immersed images in the stone

Use of concrete details with each and every character identifiable as portraits
ROMAN RELIEF SCULPTURES

Existing practice of depicting war


scenes and important events.

Such artifacts are narrative in


nature that could be in the form of
narrative relief-sculptures, murals,
paintings, scrolls etc that tells a
story in a visual language.

Possible reasons:
•Heroic deeds to be documented
•Public display for glorification
•Greater awareness
•Narration of incident
•Instigate faith and fear
•Inspire successive generations
THE COLUMN OF TRAJAN 106-113A.D
Erected to celebrate the Emperors victorious campaign against the Dacians (the
ancient inhabitants of Romania).

Single, freestanding columns used as commemorative monuments from the


Hellenistic times on and their source may have been the obelisks of Egypt

The column is considered as the most ambitious composition attempted up to that


time in the ancient world.

Theme: Recounting history of the Dacian war.

The column is distinguished by:

Its height (125 feet including the base)

Continuous spiral band of relief each of 50 inches

Relief band if un-winded is 656feet long

Base serves as burial chamber of Emperor’s ashes


THE COLUMN OF TRAJAN 106-113A.D

Detail
Geographic settings, the logistics of war and the political aspects receive detailed
attention.
Framework for this historic narrative imposed a number of difficult conditions for
the sculptors: since there could be no clarifying inscriptions, the pictorial account
had to be as explicit, detailed, and self sufficient as possible.
Spatial setting of each episode worked out with great care and planning.
Visual continuity preserved connecting the individual scenes
Landscapes and settings look like stage sets.
Ground on which the figures stand is tilted upwards.
Shallow depth of carving to prevent the shadows cast by the projecting parts
Problem of clarity and visibility from a distance resolved by removing the use of
illusionist spatial depth
Roman sculptors assert themselves once more, against the achievements and
tradition of foreshortening and use of perspective space, and which was to
become a dominant trend again in the coming centuries.

BASE OF THE COLUMN


Portrait of Trajan, top right and left
A sketch of Trajan’s market in Rome, bottom left
Emperor Philip of Arab Emperor Octavian Augustus
Aulus Metellus
(The Orator)

Statue of Hercules
Center

Statue of Marcellus
right
Gordian III
238- 244 AD
Marble
H 77 cm
Hadrian
117-138 AD
Bronze
H 48 cm
Emperor Leon
457-474 AD
Alabaster
H head 25 cm
Caesar

Fighter
Apollo Bacchus
2nd century AD 2nd century AD
Gilt bronze Marble
H 190 cm H 180 cm
Brutus
Chariot driver Caesar

You might also like