Earth Energy Designer: User Manual
Earth Energy Designer: User Manual
Earth Energy Designer: User Manual
The program implementation has partially been funded by the “Wallenberg Foundation Fellowship
Program in Environment and Sustainability” by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
The following persons have been involved in the development of the EED program:
2
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4
1.1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 4
1.2 BACKGROUND OF EED ................................................................................................ 4
1.3 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND INSTALLATION.............................................................. 4
1.4 DESCRIPTION OF FILES ................................................................................................. 5
1.2. IMPORTANT PROGRAM FEATURES.................................................................................... 5
1.5 EED MAIN MENU ......................................................................................................... 6
1.5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 6
1.5.2 The file menu........................................................................................................ 7
1.5.3 Closing the Program............................................................................................ 7
2. DATA INPUT ................................................................................................................... 8
2.1 GROUND PROPERTIES .................................................................................................. 8
2.2 BORE HOLE AND HEAT EXCHANGER ......................................................................... 10
2.3 BORE HOLE THERMAL RESISTANCE ........................................................................... 14
2.4 HEAT CARRIER FLUID ................................................................................................ 14
2.5 INPUT OF BASE LOAD DATA ...................................................................................... 15
2.6 INPUT OF PEAK LOAD DATA ...................................................................................... 17
2.7 SIMULATION PERIOD ................................................................................................. 18
3. CALCULATION OF MEAN TEMPERATURE OF THE HEAT CARRIER FLUID19
4. OUTPUT OF RESULTS................................................................................................ 20
4.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 20
4.2 CHANGING CHART PROPERTIES ................................................................................. 22
4.2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................ 22
4.2.2 Chart and series properties ............................................................................... 23
5. CALCULATION OF REQUIRED BORE HOLE LENGTH FOR GIVEN FLUID
TEMPERATURE CONSTRAINTS..................................................................................... 25
6. LITERATURE................................................................................................................ 28
3
1. Introduction
1.1 Overview
Earth Energy Design (EED) is a PC-program for bore hole heat exchanger design. Its easy of use,
short learning curve, quick calculation times and inherent databases make it a useful tool in
everyday engineering work for design of ground source heat pump system (GSHP) and bore hole
thermal storage. In very large and complex tasks EED allows for retrieving the approximate
required size and layout before initiating more detailed analyses. Even for very small plants EED
values the effort to do a calculation instead of using rules of thumb is worthwhile. In ground source
heat pump system, heat is extracted from the fluid in the ground connection by a geothermal heat
pump and distributed to the building. The fluid is then re-warmed as it flows through the ground. In
cooling mode, the process is reversed. This makes it a renewable, environmentally friendly energy
source.
Calculation of brine temperatures is done for monthly heat/cool loads. Databases provide the key
ground parameters (thermal conductivity and specific heat) as well as properties of pipe materials
and heat carrier fluids. The monthly average heating and cooling loads are the input data. In
addition, an extra pulse for peak heat/cool loads over several hours can be considered at the end of
each month. The user can choose between different methods of establishing a monthly load profile.
A printed output report and output graphical processing are provided. The program has an easy-to-
use interface. The bore hole thermal resistance is calculated in the program, using the bore hole
geometry, grouting material, pipe material and geometry. The bore hole pattern may be chosen at
will from a database of more than 300 basic configurations
4
1.4 Description of files
Project data files have the extension ".dat". Output files have the extension ".out". The standard
project data file "default.dat" is read first with every program start. This file contains default values
and may be changed to a default file for local conditions. Project data files can be saved under the
"File" menu with the „Save“ or „Save as“ command:
Output files are generated by EED with the name of the project data file, adding the extension
„.out“. These files are written in ASCII-code and can be loaded by common text editors (correct
display of columns is only achieved with rigid fonts like Courier, not with proportional fonts). The
monthly temperatures in the output files are listed in columns and can, after preparation with a text
editor, be loaded into graphic software.
The databases are ASCII-text files with the extension ".txt" and can be completed with additional
data the user may have, or changed to meet user requirements (sufficient experience is vital!).
5
Time interval −8.5 ≤ ln( t ') ≤ 3
t H2
t’ = dimensionless time with: t '= and t s =
a = thermal diffusivity (m²/s) ts 9a
Further details concerning the basic mathematical procedures used for the program can be found in
the literature listed at the end of this manual, see Section 6.
The background image may be changed by the user. Any Windows bitmap (.bmp) may be
displayed. To do that, simply copy the file containing the bitmap into the directory where „eed.exe“
resides, and rename it into „e1.bmp“. If you like to save the image provided with EED, you should
rename it to any other name before creating a new „e1.bmp“. EED automatically loads the file
„e1.bmp“ as background image when the program is started.
6
1.5.2 The file menu
The file menu is shown in Figure 1.2. An existing project data file may be loaded by clicking on
„File“ and „Open“.
The output files („*.out“) can be further edited. These are ASCII files and may be loaded into
common text editors. The databases („*.txt“) are also ASCII-format and can be changed or further
improved by experienced users.
7
2. Data input
The pull-down menu „Input“, see Figure 2.1, comprises all functions for input or change of the
data required for the calculation.
The following paragraphs show the input option by using a sample project. As example for the
calculation of project „Manual_e“, data from a plant in the German city of Linden are used.
For demonstration, we now start with „Thermal conductivity“. If no measured data from the site
are available (e.g. from a thermal response test), the value has to be assessed from the database
(according to the type of rock or soil). By clicking on the question mark beside the value for thermal
conductivity, the database is opened in a new window, see Figure 2.3.
8
Figure 2.3: Database of thermal conductivities.
The values are sorted alphabetically by the type of rock. Some additional materials like air and
water are also included. For each material, a recommended value is given (to use if no further info
exists), and the minimum and maximum values found in literature or measurements. The value will
be transferred to the data input box when clicked on. Double-clicking will do the same but also
close the database window.
Data for the Linden site are used in our example. The underground consists of tertiary sand, clay,
and in greater depth Paleozoic sediments. A plausible average for this subsoil has to be found.
Moist sand is well representing the major part of the column, and hence "Sand, moist" is selected in
the database. The value can be changed later in the sub-menu, as is done in the example (to 1.5
W/m/K), to represent better the thermal conductivity of the Paleozoic part of the profile.
Specific heat is selected in the same way, and then the annual average temperature at the earth's
surface can be chosen („Ground surface temperature“). The database is opened by clicking on the
question mark, and after selecting one of the countries for which data are available, a list with
names of cities is displayed, see Figure 2.4. The temperatures are a hint for the ground surface
temperature of the region. If necessary, interpolation has to be made, or the value for annual
average air temperature has to be used. For the example of Linden the value of Giessen is selected,
which is in only few kilometers distance. The geothermal heat flux is found in the same way.
9
With ground surface temperature, geothermal heat flux, and thermal conductivity of the ground the
undisturbed ground temperature for half of the bore hole depth is calculated. Intentionally the
geothermal heat flux and not the geothermal gradient is used for calculation to take into account the
impact of thermal conductivity. The data for our example that follows are shown below.
Figure 2.6: Input menu for bore hole and heat exchanger.
When starting with the default data file, the heat exchanger type is set to „Coaxial“. By clicking on
the sign „▼“ right of „Type“, a small pull-down window offers four options as shown in Figure 2.7.
10
Figure 2.7: Options for heat exchanger type.
The most frequent type in mid Europe, also used in the Linden example, is double-U-pipes:
Next, the bore hole geometry („Configuration“) is asked for. This means selection of an adequate
g-function.
The basic forms of bore hole heat exchanger (BHE) geometry available in Version 2.0 are as
follows:
Geometry Name
Single BHE SINGLE
BHE-Layout in a straight line LINE
BHE-Layout in a line in L-shape L-CONFIGURATION
BHE-Layout in two parallel L-shaped lines L2-CONFIGURATION
BHE-Layout in a line in U-shape U-CONFIGURATION
BHE-Layout in a line forming an open rectangle OPEN RECTANGULAR CONFIG.
BHE-Layout in form of a rectangular field RECTANGULAR CONFIGURAT.
Clicking on the question mark to the right of „Config.“ opens a new window with a list of g-
functions to choose from, see Figure 2.8. The number in the first column shows the total number of
bore holes in the configuration, followed by the exact geometry; the number in the last column is
the number of the configuration (1 to 307). A list of possible configurations and explanations of the
geometry is given in the Appendix D of this manual. Only a certain number of g-functions can be
displayed in the window, so it may be necessary to scroll down.
11
Figure 2.8: List of bore hole configurations.
The function for Linden is four holes in a line, which has been selected. The bore hole depth and
bore hole spacing can now be typed in (50 m and 4 m, respectively, for Linden). No database
values fit these parameters so it is given directly instead. In the field „Diameter“ the bore hole
diameter is typed. A database, accessible by clicking on the question mark beside the field, suggests
usual drilling diameters, including API-standards, see Figure 2.9. In Linden, a 130-mm-diameter-
hole has been drilled. A check is made, if the diameter is large enough to house the pipes, and sub-
menu cannot be closed if not.
Now the thermal contact resistance between pipe and bore hole fill is asked for („Contact res. outer
pipe/filling“). This value depends on the quality of the grouting operation. When pumping grout
into the hole from bottom to top very diligently, a value of 0.0 m²·K/W is possible, otherwise 0.01
or, with poor fill, 0.02-0.03. In the Linden example, the filling of the bore hole from the top does
not allow good contact, and hence a value of 0.02 m²·K/W is typed in.
Now, the material and dimensions of the pipes are given („Outer diameter“, „Wall thickness“,
„Thermal conductivity“). The values can either be typed into the relevant fields, or the database
for pipe material can be opened (for all three parameters simultaneously) by clicking on the
question mark to the right. In the Linden example a polyethylene pipe DN25 PN10 (German
standard) is used. This and the slightly larger pipe DN32 PN10 are most frequent for bore hole heat
exchangers in mid Europe. The database also contains data for pipes made from polyethylene,
polypropylene, steel, copper and stainless steel. After selection of a pipe, the values (d = diameter, t
12
= wall thickness, l = thermal conductivity) are transferred to the sub-menu by double-clicking on
the pipe designation, or by highlighting the pipe name, see Figure 2.10.
Now the sub-menu is filled out completely and looks as shown in Figure 2.11. It can be closed by
clicking on „Close“, if no more changes are desired. It is recommended to now and then save the
project data file in the „File“-menu.
13
The sub-menu „Bore hole and heat exchanger“ is somewhat different, if coaxial heat exchangers
are selected. A coaxial heat exchanger requires data for outer and inner pipe (typed or picked from
the database). EED checks, if the inner pipe fits comfortably into the outer pipe, and does not allow
closing of the sub-menu if not. The other parameters are identical with those in the U-pipe sub-
menu.
The user also choose whether or not to take account for heat transfer between the individual pipes
with flow up or down ("Account for internal heat transfer"). The effect of natural convection in
groundwater-filled bore holes with U-pipes is not accounted for. For the Linden example, the
window will look as shown above. It can now be closed by either clicking on „Close“ or on the „✕ ✕“
in the upper right corner of the window.
14
Figure 2.13: Input for Heat carrier fluid.
Data for common heat carrier fluids can again be picked from a database, see Figure 2.14, by
clicking on the question mark to the right. The values in the database usually refer to a working
temperature around 0 °C, which is typical for heat pump operation. Only in the case of pure water, a
selection of working temperature levels is given. The database values are transferred simultaneously
to the sub-menu by double-clicking on the required material and concentration, or by highlighting
✕ “ in the upper right corner of the database window.
the line and clicking on the „✕
15
Figure 2.15: Input for base load.
The input field is divided in three columns, „Heat“, „Cool“ and „Ground“. In the first line under
„Heat“ the annual heat load in MWh is typed, for Linden 29.03 MWh (winter 1993/94). Under
„Cool“ the annual cooling load is stated, which was in Linden 1.89 MWh in summer 1994. The next
line accommodates the seasonal performance factor (SPF); an annual average is required. For the
Linden example it was SPF = 2.12 in winter 1993/94. In the cooling mode in Linden no heat pump
is operated; this so-called „direct cooling“ can be simulated with SPF = 10000.
The factors in the following lines give the part of the heating and cooling load in each month, resp.
0.155 in January means 15.5 % of the heating load occurs in January. For the Linden example, the
heating values are kept unchanged, while for cooling mode values in the months June-August are
given. The last column displays the resulting heat extracted from or rejected to the earth for each
month, as calculated using annual load, SPF, and monthly factors. Negative values mean heat flow
into the earth. This column can not be accessed directly. The Linden example now looks like shown
below:
16
Figure 2.16: Data for our example.
When no more changes are desired, the sub-menu „Base Load“ can be closed by either clicking on
✕ “ in the upper right corner of the window.
„Close“ or on the „✕
The method for monthly heating- and cooling-loads works very much alike, only the line for annual
loads is not accessible and the monthly loads are typed in directly instead of the monthly load
factors.
17
Peak loads are used to estimate the maximum possible temperature variations. The heat extraction
or -rejection according to the peak load is added to the base load at the end of each month, and the
resulting fluid temperatures are calculated. This values are stored separately in the output file and
show the minimum respectively maximum temperatures which can occur.
Peak heat loads are given in kW. The program automatically calculates with the seasonal
performance factor (SPF) given in the base load sub-menu. In cases where peak heat load may
result in the same average heat extraction rate as given in base load, the curves will coincide. For
the calculation it is supposed, that the energy content of the short peak load is negligible (i.e.
included in the base load) and does not influence the long-term behavior.
In the Linden example the heat pump has a maximum heating output of 17 kW. In winter 24 hours
of continuous maximum heating output are possible, the corresponding values are typed in the
fields and are shown in the figure below:
In summer more than 10 hours maximum cooling load are not to be expected (early in the morning
and during night normally no cooling is required). For the Linden example 6 kW maximum cooling
load are given, which are supplied directly from the ground (SPF = 10000 is still valid from the
base load sub-menu). The values are also shown in the figure below.
18
3. Calculation of mean temperature of the heat
carrier fluid
The calculations can be done in the pull-down menu „Solve“, see Figure 3.1. Two alternatives are
offered in the „Solve“ menu:
• the calculation of the mean fluid temperature for a given plant (layout as given in the project
data file),
• the calculation of the required bore hole length to keep the fluid temperature within given limits
for that plant.
In the Linden example, now a warning concerning the Reynold´s number appears, see Figure 3.2.
19
4. Output of results
4.1 Introduction
After completion of the calculation, a window showing the input data and the results is displayed,
see Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1: Input data and calculated results (menu item Output/View design data).
With the „File“ command of the new window, the output file can be printed or saved under another
name. Editing and changing fonts and format is also possible. The output file is an ASCII-file and
thus can be loaded into most text editors to be further edited. The complete file Manual_e.out is
printed in Appendix A.
In the „Output“ menu of EED also graphs of the temperature development can be displayed. The
temperature over the months of the last year of simulation can be seen with „Plot Fluid
Temperatures“ (see Figure 4.2), and the evolution of the highest and lowest temperatures for each
year of the simulation period can be seen with „Plot Min-Max Temperatures“ (see Figure 4.3).
20
Bas e load
15 Peak c ool load
Peak heat load
Fluid temperature [º C]
10
-5
-10
-15
JA N FEB MA R A PR MA Y JUN JUL A UG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Y ear 10
20 Peak min
A nnual min-max f luid temp. [º C]
Peak max
15 Bas e min
Bas e max
10
-5
-10
-15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y ear
Each of the two graphic windows has the pull-down menus „File“ and „Options“. With the „File“
menu for graphs, see Figure 4.4, the following operations can be made:
21
Figure 4.4 The file menu.
With „Copy to clipboard...“, the figure can be transferred to other programs under Windows (e.g.
MS-Word). The command „Save to *.WMF...“ allows to save the graph as a Windows-Metafile,
that can later be imported into other programs. „Print preview...“ allows to check the printer output
of the graph, to change and adjust it, and to send it to a printer; with „Print setup“, the printer can be
selected and configured.
The pull-down menu „Options“, see Figure 4.5, allows to change the style and to edit the graph:
The command „Edit chart“ allows a more sophisticated editing of the figure (changing colors,
adjusting axes and scales, editing the legend, etc.).
22
Figure 1: Chart settings may be changed in menu item Options/Edit chart.
Chart pages
23
Series Pages
The series pages contain parameters dependant on the series type concerned. The most important
options are as follows:
Format Page - Contains Series type specific parameters
Point – Visible points, margins
General Page - Series value format, axis association
Marks Page - Series mark format, text, frame and back color and positioning
24
5. Calculation of required bore hole length for given
fluid temperature constraints
In the chosen example of Linden the plant is undersized, as also was detected in the monitoring
data. Mean base load temperatures below 0 °C over several weeks should be avoided, and
temperatures should preferably not drop below -5 °C in peak heat load conditions. With the second
alternative in menu „Solve“, see Figure 5.1, an easy way to calculate the required bore hole length
to fulfil this conditions is offered:
The calculation, using the bore hole configuration as stated in the sub-menu „Bore hole and Heat
Exchanger“ in the „Input“-Menu, is started by clicking on „Solve required bore hole length“. The
bore hole length is increased, which can be seen in the output window. Also the parameter for bore
hole depth in the sub-menu „Bore hole and Heat Exchanger“ in the „Input“-menu is
automatically set to the new value of 82.87 m for the Linden example. The graphics (see below)
now show a very satisfying temperature development.
NB: When calculating the required bore hole length, the value for bore hole length is changed in the
sub-menu „Bore hole and Heat Exchanger". The program has some routines to avoid paradox
25
operation conditions (e.g. heat extraction with fluid temperatures higher than those of the
surrounding ground), but nevertheless unrealistic bore hole length can be suggested in extreme
cases. Hence it is recommended to check regularly fluid temperatures and bore hole length when
using the option „Solve required bore hole length“.
16
Bas e load
14
Peak c ool load
12 Peak heat load
10
8
6
temperature [º C]
4
2
0
-2
-4
0.018
Peak min
0.016
A nnual min-max f luid temp. [º C]
Peak max
0.014
Bas e min
0.012 Bas e max
0.010
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0.000
-0.002
-0.004
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y ear
In the graph „Minimum and maximum temperatures“ the temperature curves will approach an
almost horizontal line after some years. The time to attain such steady-state thermal conditions in-
creases with the number of bore holes and the bore hole depth. For sites without groundwater flow
the temperature development over simulation period has to be observed thoroughly. A totally hori-
zontal line theoretically will only be found in plants with balanced heating-/cooling load, but an
asymptotic closing in to a not too low temperature level is sufficient (not to high level in case of
cooling).
26
The influence of groundwater flow through the bore hole field is not accounted for in the present
version of EED. The effect of the groundwater flow is to move the thermal disturbance (caused by
the injection or extraction of heat) away from the bore holes. This effect improves the performance
of systems designed for dissipation of heat and cold into the ground. The improvement depends on
the magnitude of the groundwater flow (given in terms of the so-called "Darcy flow") and on how
much of the total bore hole length penetrates layers with groundwater flow. For systems intended
for storage of heat and/or cold, the groundwater flow will increase heat losses and thereby reduce
the efficiency of the store.
27
6. Literature
Claesson, J. & Eskilson, P. (1985): Thermal Analysis of Heat Extraction Bore holes. - Proc.
3rd Int. Conf. Energy Storage ENERSTOCK 85, pp. 222-227, PWC, Ottawa
Claesson, J. & Eskilson, P. (1986): Conductive Heat extraction by a deep bore hole,
analytical studies. - University of Lund, Lund
Claesson, J. (1987): Computer Models for and analysis of thermal processes in the ground. -
Proc. WS on GSHP Albany, Rep. HPC-WR-2, pp. 201-204, Karlsruhe
Claesson, J. & Eskilson, P. (1988): Conductive Heat Extraction to a deep Bore hole,
Thermal Analysis and Dimensioning Rules. - Energy 13/6, pp. 509-527, Oxford
Claesson, J. & Eskilson, P. (1988): PC Design Model for Heat Extraction Bore holes. -
Proc. 4th int. Conf. Energy Storage JIGASTOCK 88, pp. 135-137, Paris.
Claesson, J. & Hellström, G. (1988): Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Local Heat
Transfer in a Bore hole with Heat Exchanger Pipes. - Proc. 4th int. Conf. Energy
Storage JIGASTOCK 88, pp. 139-143, Paris
Claesson, J., Eskilson, P. & Hellström, G. (1990): PC Design Model for Heat Extraction
Bore holes. - Proc. 3rd WS on SAHPGCS Göteborg, CITη 1990:3, pp. 99-102,
Göteborg
Claesson, J. (1991): PC Design Model for Thermally Interacting Deep Ground Heat
Exchangers. - Proc. WS on GSHP Montreal, HPC-WR-8, pp. 95-104, Sittard
Eskilson, P. (1986a): Superposition Bore hole Model. - University of Lund, Lund
Eskilson, P. (1986b): Temperature Response Function g for 38 Bore hole Configurations. -
University of Lund, Lund
Eskilson, P. (1986c): Numerical analysis of radial and vertical mesh division for a single
heat extraction bore hole. - University of Lund, Lund
Eskilson, P. & Claesson, J. (1988): Simulation Model for thermally interacting heat
extraction bore holes. - Numerical Heat Transfer, 13, pp. 149-165
Hellström, G. (1991): PC-Modelle zur Erdsondenauslegung. - IZW Bericht 3/91, pp. 229-
238, Karlsruhe
Hellström, G. & Sanner, B. (1994): Software for dimensioning of deep bore holes for heat
extraction. - Proc. CALORSTOCK 94, pp. 195-202, Espoo/Helsinki
Hellström, G. & Sanner, B. (1994): PC-Programm zur Auslegung von Erdwärmesonden. -
IZW-Bericht 1/94, pp. 341-350, Karlsruhe
Hellström, G. Sanner, B., Klugescheid, M., Gonka, T. & Mårtensson, S. (1997): Expe-
riences with the bore hole heat exchanger software EED. - Proc. MEGASTOCK
97, pp. 247-252, Sapporo
Sanner B., Klugescheid, M. & Knoblich, K. (1996): Numerical Modelling of Conductive
and Convective Heat Transport in the Ground for UTES, with example. - Proc.
Eurotherm Seminar 49, pp. 137-146, Eindhoven
Sanner, B. & Hellström, G. (1996): "Earth Energy Designer", eine Software zur Berechnung
von Erdwärmesondenanlagen. - Tagungsband 4. Geothermische Fachtagung
Konstanz, pp. 326-333, GtV, Neubrandenburg
28
Appendix A. Output data file „Manual_e.out“
„Manual_e.out“
D E S I G N D A T A
======================
GROUND
Ground thermal conductivity 1.500 W/m,K
Ground heat capacity 1800000 J/m³,K
Ground surface temperature 9.00 °C
Geothermal heat flux 0.0650 W/m²
BORE HOLE
Configuration: 4 : 1 x 4, line
- g-function No. 3
Bore hole depth 50.00 m
Bore hole spacing 4.00 m
Bore hole installation DOUBLE-U
Bore hole diameter 0.130 m
U-pipe diameter 0.025 m
U-pipe thickness 0.0023 m
U-pipe thermal conductivity 0.420 W/m,K
U-pipe shank spacing 0.0700 m
Filling thermal conductivity 0.600 W/m,K
Contact resistance pipe/filling 0.0200 K/(W/m)
THERMAL RESISTANCES
29
BASE LOAD
PEAK LOAD
C A L C U L A T E D V A L U E S
==================================
THERMAL RESISTANCES
30
SPECIFIC HEAT EXTRACTION RATE (W/m)
31
PEAK COOL LOAD: MEAN FLUID TEMPERATURES (at end of month)
32
Appendix B. Output data file „Manual_x.out“
„Manual_x.out“
D E S I G N D A T A
======================
GROUND
Ground thermal conductivity 1.500 W/m,K
Ground heat capacity 1800000 J/m³,K
Ground surface temperature 9.00 °C
Geothermal heat flux 0.0650 W/m²
BORE HOLE
Configuration: 4 : 1 x 4, line
- g-function No. 3
Bore hole depth 82.87 m
Bore hole spacing 4.00 m
Bore hole installation DOUBLE-U
Bore hole diameter 0.130 m
U-pipe diameter 0.025 m
U-pipe thickness 0.0023 m
U-pipe thermal conductivity 0.420 W/m,K
U-pipe shank spacing 0.0700 m
Filling thermal conductivity 0.600 W/m,K
Contact resistance pipe/filling 0.0200 K/(W/m)
THERMAL RESISTANCES
33
BASE LOAD
PEAK LOAD
C A L C U L A T E D V A L U E S
==================================
THERMAL RESISTANCES
34
SPECIFIC HEAT EXTRACTION RATE (W/m)
35
PEAK COOL LOAD: MEAN FLUID TEMPERATURES (at end of month)
36
Appendix C. Data output files
Data output files (for the first calculation in this manual)
tfluid.out: tfmin.out:
1 -1.46234 1 -12.40746
2 -11.02517 2 -13.37749
3 -10.13564 3 -14.06345
4 -8.67796 4 -14.45229
5 4.64913 5 -14.72426
6 10.56472 6 -14.93406
7 12.90986 7 -15.10565
8 11.43624 8 -15.24364
9 5.87745 9 -15.35278
10 -7.85507 10 -15.44329
11 -10.23752
12 -12.40746
13 -13.08964
14 -13.37749
15 -12.05968
16 -10.32547
17 3.21812
18 9.27690
19 11.74905
20 10.36980
21 4.90152
22 -8.75336
23 -11.06998
24 -13.18043
25 -13.81475
26 -14.06345
27 -12.71131
28 -10.94229
29 2.63568
30 8.72666
31 11.22922
32 9.87844
33 4.43223
34 -9.20394
35 -11.50331
36 -13.59781
37 -14.21734
38 -14.45229
39 -13.08732
40 -11.30579
37
Appendix D. List of possible bore hole
configurations
38
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
3 2 x 2, L-config 21
4 2 x 3, L-config 22
: : :
11 2 x 10, L-config 29
5 3 x 3, L-config 30
6 3 x 4, L-config 31
: : :
12 3 x 10, L-config37
7 4 x 4, L-config 38
8 4 x 5, L-config 39
: : :
13 4 x 10, L-config 44
9 5 x 5, L-config 45
10 5 x 6, L-config 46
: : :
14 5 x 10, L-config 50
11 6 x 6, L-config 51
12 6 x 7, L-config 52
: : :
15 6 x 10, L-config 55
13 7 x 7, L-config 56
14 7 x 8, L-config 57
: : :
16 7 x 10, L-config 59
15 8 x 8, L-config 60
16 8 x 9, L-config 61
17 8 x 10, L-config 62
17 9 x 9, L-config 63
18 9 x 10, L-config64
19 10 x 10, L-config 65
39
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
8 3 x 3, L2-config 66
10 3 x 4, L2-config67
: : :
22 3 x 10, L2-config 73
12 4 x 4, L2-config74
14 4 x 5, L2-config75
: : :
24 4 x 10, L2-config 80
40
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
5 3 x 2, U-config 102
7 3 x 3, U-config 103
: : :
21 3 x 10, U-config 110
6 4 x 2, U-config 111
8 4 x 3, U-config 112
: : :
22 4 x 10, U-config 119
41
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
8 3 x 3, open rect.174
10 3 x 4, open rect. 175
: : :
52 3 x 25, open rect. 187
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
12 4 x 4, open rect. 188
14 4 x 5, open rect.189
42
No. BHE Name No. of configuration
4 2 x 2, rectangle 233
6 2 x 3, rectangle 234
: : :
50 2 x 25, rectangle 247
9 3 x 3, rectangle 248
12 3 x 4, rectangle 249
: : :
75 3 x 25, rectangle 261
16 4 x 4, rectangle 262
20 4 x 5, rectangle 263
: : :
100 4 x 25, rectangle 274
25 5 x 5, rectangle 275
30 5 x 6, rectangle 276
: : :
100 5 x 20, rectangle 285
36 6 x 6, rectangle 286
42 6 x 7, rectangle 287
: : :
96 6 x 16, rectangle 293
49 7 x 7, rectangle 294
56 7 x 8, rectangle 295
: : :
98 7 x 14, rectangle 299
64 8 x 8, rectangle 300
72 8 x 9, rectangle 301
: : :
96 8 x 12, rectangle 303
81 9 x 9, rectangle 304
90 9 x 10, rectangle 305
100 10 x 10, rectangle 306
120 10 x 12, rectangle 307
43