(Report) Logonio, Robert

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Republic of the Philippines

EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY


Tacloban City

Graduate School

Student: ROBERT P. LOGRONIO MAEd- A & S


Subject:

Budgeting: Its Implication to Educational Planning

 A school budget can be defined as a document or statement outlining a school’s revenue


(income) projections against expenditure.
 A school budget can also be defined as a financial plan of funds that a school expects to
receive and the expenditure it will take to achieve its educational objectives
 Budgeting facilitates a systematic plan for evaluating the quality and quantity of services
needed in a school.
 A budget ensures the achievement of the school’s objectives- the plans that required the
spending of money is taken care of by the budget.
 The budget compels persons to plan- the principal has to ensure that they plan in order to
spend from the budget.
 A budget provides a framework for responsibility of accounting and to establish a system of
control.
 Individuals such as the principal, the superintendent, and the school board are highly
accountable for proper documentation of expenditure. Persons have to spend according the
revenue available hence their spending is controlled.

While there are several steps to the school budgeting process, they fall broadly into four
stages:

 Review
 Planning
 Forecasting
 Implementation/evaluation.

Every stage feeds into the next. It follows a cyclical process and relies on taking
predetermined actions at specific points of the year. The benefit is a considered, informed and
realistic budget that sets you up for financial success.
School and academies budget planning process

Stage 1: Review
Reviewing past performance against budgets can be revealing. How accurate was the
budget? Where did the underspends and overspends occur? These questions can help
you shape your school budget and increase its accuracy. Look at the cost base too. It can
give you a foundation on which to build your budget and be a prompt to review
expenditure. Benchmarking against similar schools can help you understand how your
spending compares and put it into context. It’s also an opportunity to identify cost savings
or improvements.
Stage 2: Planning
Once you’ve gathered your historical data and carried out the benchmarking, it’s time to
think about your resource, staffing and accommodation needs for the next year. The
planning stage shouldn’t be a one-step process. It’s important to model a range of
income and cost scenarios based on your most important data.
To be as accurate as possible in your planning, consider data such as:

Changes in funding (revenue and capital income)


Number of pupils and their characteristics
Class and group sizes
Staffing profiles and increments
Pay and price increases
Procurement and maintenance
Longer-term development plans in areas such as asset management, premises, staff and
IT/ICT
Local Authority Plans/Central Government Plans
Ofsted reports
Stage 3: Forecasting
Your three to five-year forecast should be more than your ‘best guess’ for it to be useful. Yet it’s
difficult to predict changes in areas such as funding, pupil numbers and the costs of staffing. It
can be beneficial to get involved in the local community to stay abreast of developments which
could impact your school. Being active within the wider education sector can also give you
insight into factors most likely to affect you. You can use this knowledge and your historical
data to model a range of income/cost scenarios to assess the impact of varying factors on the
budget.
Factors to consider include:
Funding over the next three years
Changes in pupils and their characteristics
Curriculum changes
Likely staff profiles
Teaching staff salary rises
Inflation
Aims of the school development plan
Longer-term improvement and development aspirations
Stage 4: Implementation and evaluation
Once the budget gets approval from the governing body the budget is implemented,
and monitoring and evaluation should begin. Monitoring and reviewing your budget monthly
will highlight areas of potential risk early enough to act. It also makes life easier when it comes
to submitting budget monitoring.
Once the budget gets approval from the governing body the budget is implemented,
and monitoring and evaluation should begin. Monitoring and reviewing your budget monthly
will highlight areas of potential risk early enough to act. It also makes life easier when it comes
to submitting budget monitoring.

PLANNING PROGRAMMING BUDGETING SYSTEM (PPBS)


(1960’s) Planning, Programming, Budgeting Systems (PPBS) was considered an
innovation in budgeting. PPBS was first introduced in the Defense Department in the
USA in 1961 by Robert McNamara, and in all departments in 1965 until 1975. Though it
failed to be widely adopted in government, PPBS is effective is less complex
organizations such as NGO’s.
PPBS is an integrated management system that places emphasis on the use of analysis
for program decision making. The purpose of PPBS is to provide management with a
better analytical basis for making program decisions, and for putting such decisions into
operation through an integration of the planning, programming and budget functions.
Program decision making is a fundamental function of management. It involves making
basic choices as to the direction of an organization’s effort and allocating resources
accordingly. This function consists first of defining the objectives of the organization,
then deciding on the measures that will be taken in pursuit of those goals, and finally
putting the selected courses of action into effect.
An organization can be viewed in a simplified way as carrying out its functions through
five basic and sequential phases: (1) planning, (2) programming, (3) budgeting, (4)
operations, and (5) evaluation.
Specification of Objectives – The objectives of the programs are to be specified in
consistence with the long-term goals in quantitative terms as far as possible.
Systemic Analysis – The possible alternative projects to achieve the program objectives
are analyzed in a systematic way with the use of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness
analysis.
An organization can be viewed in a simplified way as carrying out its functions through
five basic and sequential phases: (1) planning, (2) programming, (3) budgeting, (4)
operations, and (5) evaluation.
Specification of Objectives – The objectives of the programs are to be specified in
consistence with the long-term goals in quantitative terms as far as possible.
Systemic Analysis – The possible alternative projects to achieve the program objectives
are analyzed in a systematic way with the use of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness
analysis.

You might also like