Econ Final Reviewer
Econ Final Reviewer
Econ Final Reviewer
GROUP 1- Trade Policy Debate: Export Promotion, Import Substitution, And, Economic Integration
INTRODUCTION
grow faster
innovate
improve productivity
open
rule-based
predictable multilateral trading system
Inward-looking development
Economic self reliance
Domestic development of technology
“Learn by doing”
Develop technologies with the country’s capabilities
Debate in the 1950s between the free traders and the protectionists.
The inward-looking approach predominated into the 1970s.
The outward-looking approach became prominent in the 1980s and early 1980s.
Import Substitutions
substitute first the imported basic goods then the more sophisticated ones.
protection of high tariffs and quotas on these imports.
balanced growth
Domestic prices will be competitive with world prices.
Export Promotions
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Outward-looking development policies
Inward-looking development policies
Import substitution
Export promotion
International commodity agreement
Multifiber Arrangement (MFA)
Trade deficit
Infant industry
Official exchange rate
Free-market exchange rate
Overvalued exchange rate
Nontariff trade barrier
Nominal rate of protection
Effective rate of protection
Value added
Exchange control
Dual exchange rate (parallel exchange rate)
Devaluation
Depreciation (of currency)
Appreciation
Flexible exchange rate
Economic union
Regional trading bloc
Customs union
Free-trade area
Common market
Autarky
Trade creation
Trade diversion
Manage floats
Wage-price spiral
Undervalued exchange rate
Trade optimists
Trade pessimists
New protectionism
Trade liberalization
Industrialization
strategy approach
Economic integration
CONCLUSION
GROUP 2 - Foreign Finance, Investment, Aid, and Conflict: Controversies and Opportunities
- With the number of migrants worldwide now reaching almost 200 million . . ., remittances are
an important way out of extreme poverty for a large number of people. - François Bourguignon,
former chief economist, World Bank, 2008
The international flow of financial resources
Private foreign direct and portfolio investment
foreign “direct” investment
foreign portfolio investment
Remittances of earnings by international migrants
Public and private development assistance (foreign aid)
individual national governments and multinational donor agencies
private nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
Although MNCs provide capital, they may lower domestic savings and investment rates.
Although the initial impact of MNC investment is to improve the foreign exchange position of
the recipient nation, its long-run impact may be to reduce foreign-exchange earnings.
Transfer pricing
The management, entrepreneurial skills, ideas, technology, and overseas contacts provided by
MNCs.
Portfolio investment - consists of foreign purchases of Bond, Shares, Certificates, and commercial
papers.
REMITTANCES - A remittance refers to money that is sent or transferred to another party. The term is
derived from the word remit, which means to send back. Remittances can be sent via a wire transfer,
electronic payment system, mail, draft, or check.
Remittances can be used for any type of payment including invoices or other obligations. But the term is
typically used to refer to money sent to family members back in a person's home country.
Each year, billions of dollars are sent by migrant workers to their home countries. Like us in the
Philippines. According to the World Bank, in 2019 the total value of remittances reached a record $554
billion. Remittances are funds transferred from migrants to their home country. They are the private
savings of workers and families that are spent in the home country for food, clothing and other
expenditures, and which drive the home economy. For many developing nations, remittances from
citizens working abroad provide an import source of much-needed funds.
Developing countries received two other major sources of foreign exchange: public(official) and
private (unofficial) assistance.
Both are forms of foreign aid but public aid is usually measured in official statistics.
In general, all governmental resource transfers from one country to another should be included
in the term foreign aid, yet, it increases a number of problems.
There is consequently a net gain for developing countries and a net loss for developed countries
that amounts to a real resource transfer to the developing world.
We should not include all transfers of capital to developing countries, particularly the capital
flows of private foreign investors.
Private flows amount to normal commercial transactions and therefore not part of foreign aid.
Foreign aid as defined by Economists, are any flow of capital to a developing country that meets
two criteria: (1) objective should be non-commercial from the point of view of the donor, and
(2) it should be characterized by concessional terms.
Military aid is excluded from international economic measurements of foreign aid flows.
The concept of foreign aid now widely used is one that encompasses all official grants and
concessional loans, in currency or in kind, that are openly aimed at transferring resources from
developed to less developed nations on development, poverty, or income distribution grounds.
There are measurement and conceptual problems in the calculation of actual development
assistant flows.
3 Major Problems in Measuring Aid: (1) cannot simply add up the dollar volumes of grants and
loans, (2) aid can be tied either by source or by funds and (3) we always need to distinguish
between the nominal and real value of foreign assistance.
Aid flows are usually calculated at nominal levels and have a tendency to show a stable rise over
time.
Amounts and allocation: public aid
The money volume of official development assistance (ODA), which includes bilateral grants,
concessional loans, and technical assistance, as well as multilateral flows, grew from an annual
rate of under $5 billion in 1960 to $50 billion in 2000 and to over $128 billion in 2008.
It remains to be seen how the long recession and fiscal crises in many high-income countries will
affect these ratios in the coming years.
Although the United States remains the largest donor in absolute terms, it provides the lowest
percentage of GNI-0.18% in 2008.
Only five countries are currently providing ODA in excess of the Un target of 0.70%: Sweden,
Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg.
In 2012 however, the developed countries spent about $120 billion on aid, they also spent triple
this amount, some $360 billion on agricultural subsidies that often harmed developing-country
exports.
In 2008, by far the largest recipient was Iraq, with $9.9 in aid, or approximately $321 billion per
Capita.
Some 20 countries received at least $1 billion in aid. But India, with by far the largest number of
extremely poor people in the world, received just $2 per person in aid.
Niger, considered the poorest country in the world, received just $41 per person.
It is clear that the allocation of foreign aid is only partly determined by the relative needs of
developing countries. Much bilateral aid seems to be based largely on political and military
considerations.
Multilateral aid is somewhat more economically rational, although here, too, the rich often
seem to attract more resources per capita than the poor.
Political Motivations - have been by far the more important for aid-granting nations, especially
for the largest donor country, the United States.
Economic Motivations - Within the broad context of political and strategic priorities, foreign-aid
programs of the developed nations have had a strong economic rationale.
Two gap model - A model of foreign aid comparing savings and foreign-exchange gaps to determine
which is the binding constraint on economic growth.
Foreign-exchange gap - are unequal in magnitude and that they are essentially independent.
Fiscal gap - deficiencies of government investments including infrastructure and human capital
that are complementary to raise the rate of return from private investment.
It is estimated that NGOs in developing countries are affecting the lives of some 250 million
people
Voluntary failure- rejects the view that this sector is merely a residual response to failures of
government and the market
Aid has indeed promoted growth and structural transformation in many developing countries
Critics who argue that Aid does not promote faster growth
Official Aid is further criticized for focusing on, and stimulating the growth of, the modern
sector, thereby increasing the gap in living standards between the rich and the poor in
developing countries
Foreign Aid has been a force for antidevelopment in the sense that it both retards growth
through reduced savings and worsens income inequalities.
Critics on the right charge that foreign aid has been a failure because it has been largely
appropriated by corrupt bureaucrats
External Validity Problem- refers to how well the outcome of a study can be expected to apply
to other settings
Aid weariness, polls have shown that the public is increasingly willing to support increases in
government aid budgets and to donate development assistance via NGOs
The improvements in accountability and evaluation of aid that have taken more shape since the
Paris Declaration, and some enhancement of resources are hopeful signs that aid will become
more effective and more targeted toward people living in poverty.
Conflict and Development
Intrastate/civil conflict- refers to violence between a government and at least one non-
governmental party within a sovereign country
Extra-state or extra-systemic violent conflict between one non-state and one state actor outside
of the existing state’s borders
Destruction of wealth- Violent conflict destroys capital, and some of what is not destroyed is diverted to
destructive activities
Hunger and Poverty- It is not surprising that in many conflict countries, food production drops and it
leads to hunger. Poverty increases through declines in opportunities to earn incomes but also through
direct outcomes of fighting.
Loss of Education- The education rate decreases when there is an armed conflict in a country, some
educational infrastructure where destroyed and fear to walk to school is inevitable because of concern
for the children’s and also teacher’s safety and security.
A Torn Social Fabric - Violent conflict or its imminent threat creates refugees— one estimate is an
additional 64 refugees per 1,000 people on average from a civil war, 45 per 1,000 from coups, and 30
per 1,000 from guerrilla warfare
Horizontal Inequalities
RELATED STUDIES
CASE STUDY: Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Honduras: Contrasts and Prospects for Convergence
Honduras (HND):
GNI – reflect CRI’s much higher economic growth rate over the last 60 years.
Under 5-morality –GTM has the high risk because it is also severe in Under-5 malnourishment.
The differences in income and human development are mirrored in the poverty statistics: HND
has about 9 times the incidence of below-$1.25 per day poverty, and GTM has 10 times the
poverty incidence of CRI.
Fertility - High fertility in GTM, where 41%of the population is under age 15—the youngest
population in Latin America.
INEQUALITY
Land Inequality - Honduras has farms that is too small to adequately support a family.
Gender Inequality – Gender inequality is a smaller problem in CRI than the other countries.
GDP per capita more than quadrupled in CRI between 1950 and 2008; it less than doubled in
GTM and is just 1.75 times higher in HND.
The three countries produce similar agricultural products like coffee and bananas, reflecting
their similar climates (tropical climates with distinct dry and rainy seasons)
As a result of active industrial policies, CRI has significantly diversified, including into new high-
tech industries.
CRI also has much better roads and other infrastructure than the other countries.
CRI has attracted more than twice the stock of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) than the other
economies, despite its smaller population. This has followed from CRI’s better education,
infrastructure, environment, and ongoing economic growth performance.
CONFLICT
Guatemala - has had very high levels of often violent conflict and genocidal campaigns
(intentional action to destroy a people—usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious
group—in whole or in part);
Honduras - has a lower but still serious history of conflict or military domination, and
CRI has had comparatively little conflict, particularly over the last 65 years.
INTRODUCTION
A core goal of public policy should be to facilitate the development of institutions that bring out the best
in humans. —Elinor Ostrom
ECONOMIC PLAN - A specific set of quantitative economic targets to be reached in a given period of
time, with a stated strategy for achieving those targets.
a. Comprehensive Plan
b. Partial Plan
THE PLANNING PROCESS - An exercise in which a government:
Mixed economies are often distinguished by a substantial amount of government ownership and
control.
1. Subsistence sector
Government’s deliberate use of domestic saving and foreign finance to carry out public
investment projects.
MARKET FAILURE - A phenomenon that results from the existence of market imperfections that
weaken the functioning of a market economy.
3. The market produces undesirable results as measured by social objectives other than the allocation of
resources.
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND ALLOCATION - This argument stresses that developing economies
cannot afford to waste their very limited financial and skilled human resources on unproductive
ventures.
A formal economic model describing growth of an economy in one or a few sectors using a limited
number of variables. It is the first and most elementary planning model used in almost every developing
country.
K(t) = cY(t)
Where:
A formal model dividing the economy into sectors and tracing the flow of interindustry purchases
(inputs) and sales (outputs).
EXAMPLE: The agricultural sector is both a producer of output (e.g., wheat) and a user of inputs from
the manufacturing sector (e.g., machinery, fertilizer).
PROJECT APPRAISAL AND SOCIAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS The vast majority of day-to-day operational
decisions with regard to the allocation of limited public investment funds are based on a microeconomic
technique of analysis known as project appraisal. It is the quantitative analysis of the relative desirability
(profitability) of investing a given sum of public or private funds in alternative projects. On the other
hand, the methodology of project appraisal rests on the theory and practice of social cost-benefit
analysis, a tool of economic analysis in which the actual and potential private and social costs various
economic decisions are weighed against actual and potential private and social benefits.
MARKET PRICES OF OUTPUTS AND INPUTS DO NOT GIVE A TRUE REFLECTION OF SOCIAL BENEFITS
AND COSTS:
1. Inflation and currency overvaluation
4. Savings deficiency
What went wrong? Why has the early euphoria about planning gradually been transformed
into disillusionment and dejection?
INSTITUTIONAL WEAKNESS
• Many economists, some finance ministers in developing countries, and the heads of the major
international development organizations advocated increased use of the market mechanism as
a key instrument for promoting greater efficiency and more rapid economic growth.
• Among the international organizations preaching the virtues of the free market were the IMF
and the World Bank, in addition to several bilateral donors such as U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID).
• GOVERNMENT FAILURE
• Government regulations may improve industry efficiency, such as by breaking monopoly power;
and it may otherwise improve social welfare, such as by limiting pollution. But poorly designed
regulations could stifle emerging industries or even facilitate corruption.
• Similarly, government programs can reduce social risks; but it has been observed that
development planning could increase risks because of problems of correcting mistakes: Markets
may make serious mistakes; but through its decentralized decision making mechanisms, often
markets can more easily self-correct.