Martiká
Martiká
Martiká
Research Journal
Volume 10, No. 32, Dec. 2016, pages 47–52 Research Article
DOI: 10.12913/22998624/65107
Pavol Martikáň1, Mário Drbúl1, Jozef Holubják1, Jozef Mrázik1, Richard Joch1
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitna 1, 010 26, Žilina, Slovakia, e-mail: pavol.
martikan@fstroj.uniza.sk, mario.drbul@fstroj.uniza.sk, jozef.holubjak@fstroj.uniza.sk, jozef.mrazik@fstroj.
uniza.sk, richard.joch@fstroj.uniza.sk
47
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal Vol. 10 (32), 2016
Fig. 2. Drawing - Position tolerance of threaded holes Fig. 5. Sensor VAST XXT by Carl Zeiss [8]
48
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal Vol. 10 (32), 2016
Fig. 7. Visual display of scanned points by spiral Fig. 9. Tapered threaded hole location gages:
scanning a) short, b) long
49
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal Vol. 10 (32), 2016
Fig. 10. Scanning of the two circles on the location Fig. 11. View of the scanned points in Calypso 5.0
gage program
the cylinder represents the axis of the gage, and The smallest position deviation is reached by
thus the threaded hole’s axis. the location gage with dislocation of the scanned
These circles consist of exact number of cylinder and direct measurement techniques
points (Fig. 11), from which required position (0.1153 mm to 0.1249 mm). The position devia-
deviation of location gages was calculated to the tion is about 0,12 mm. Measuring without dislo-
reference hole by the software. cation of the scanned cylinder had position de-
Two measurement techniques with set of viation more than three times higher (0.3621 mm
short gages were used, the case of the scanned and 0.4304 mm).
cylinder had height 3 and 6 mm. A comparison of the measured position devia-
With a set of long gages we used three mea- tions of the threaded hole number 2 is graphically
surement techniques, the case of the height of presented in Figure 13. The value of the position
scanned cylinders was 3, 6 and 13.5 mm. deviation obtained during the measurement tech-
Each measurement technique was repeated nique on a long location gage without dislocation
30 times and after each measurement the location of the scanned cylinder was outside of the tolerance
gages were screwed/unscrewed in to the threads. zone, more than one tenth of a millimeter (0.6167
Also, the gages changed the position in holes af- mm). Values of other measurement techniques were
ter each measurement. in the desired position tolerance of 0.5 mm.
Mutual comparison of all used measurment
Experiment evaluation techniques for threaded hole number 3 in terms of
measured position deviation are graphically dis-
Mutual comparison of all used measurement played in Figure14.
techniques for threaded hole number 1 in terms of Outside the tolerance zone was the value of
measured position deviation are graphically dis- the position deviation for long location gage with-
played in Figure 12. out dislocation of the scanned cylinder (0.6549
Fig. 12. Comparison of measured position deviatons by all measurement techniques for threaded hole number 1
50
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal Vol. 10 (32), 2016
Fig. 13. Comparison of measured position deviatons by all measurement techniques for threaded hole number 2
Fig. 14. Comparison of measured position deviatons by all measurement techniques for threaded hole number 3
mm). Short location gage has deviaton just below There was a notable difference – more than
the position tolerance. The smallest position de- three times (position deviation between the differ-
viation has a direct measurement technique by a ent sets of gages). In practice, it is recommended
spiral scanning (0.1719 mm) and generating lines to use the dislocation of scanned cylinder. Also
scanning (0.1785 mm). Measurement techniques direct measurement techniques give similar re-
using short and long location gages with disloca- sults by scanning spiral and generating lines. In
tion had position deviation 0.2326 mm. the third threaded hole we even got the slightest
deviation position measurement techniques by a
spiral scanning.
CONCLUSIONS It appears from the experiments we can
conclude that in terms of accuracy of measure-
To determine position deviation of the ment methods the results are very similar and it
threaded holes two methods of measurement is not possible to clearly identify better meth-
were used – direct and indirect. Each method od or technique of measurement of threaded
consisted of a certain measurement techniques holes. However, to verify the accuracy of di-
and procedures. For indirect methods two differ- rect measurement it is appropriate to execute
ent sets of tapered threaded hole location gages further experiments, in that nonfunctional part
were used, which are screwed into the holes and
of the thread hole is scanned.
their location was identified on a 3D coordinate
measuring machine. Gage position represented Acknowledgements
the position of threaded holes.
The results of measurements with gages were The research work reported here was made
not very differnt. The main difference occurred when possible by the grant project No. KEGA 031ŽU-
using various position evaluation methods (with and 4/2016 and International project APVV SK-
without dislocation of the scanned cylinder). PL-2015-0008 and CARL ZEISS Slovakia.
51
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal Vol. 10 (32), 2016
52