FLP Case Dipesh

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FLP CASE ANALYSIS

DIPESH- The Project Manager


Group 8
(Maithili Joshi, Rakesh Kunbi, Rishabh, Suman Sharma, Tanya Saxena, Vishal Klandria)

a) What is the problem described in the case?


Ans: The visible problems in the company are listed as below:

 Steep and rapid team growth from 10 people to around 50


 Best Engineers with the brightest talent were being promoted as Managers
 Induction for Managers was not being done since their questions/doubts were of very basic
nature
 Role conflicts, dissatisfaction and ambiguity between one’s roles and one’s responsibilities
 In-congruence in what the employees want to do (Interests) against what they do (Roles)
 New managers were trying to solve the managerial problems the technical way
 Some problems seemed to be related to handling small teams vs big teams
 The recognition of the fact that “Coding and People Management need different skills and
mind-set” seem to be missing
 Dipesh seemed more worried about project delivery than the people
 Lack of communication was very evident between Dipesh and the new Managers

b) What is the cause of the problem as emerging from the case data? Please provide evidences?
Ans: The major reasons for the above problems are as follows:

 People usually know their roles but not the responsibility for those roles.
 If people don’t enjoy the roles they have been asked to do, the projects and organization
loses out big time
 The perception that “Coding is the only productive work done in the IT and setup and other
tasks including Management are unnecessary” is grossly wrong
 Every role didn’t have its defined behaviour, responsibilities and success measures
 Dipesh is not clearly defining the expectations from the role of his Managers
 Majority of people want to be called as Managers but do not invest time and energy to
master the role
 Promotion criteria is misleading here as it tends to reward the performance of the past roles
but doesn’t keep in mind the potential required for the future roles

c) What should be done to solve the problem in the near future?


Ans: Few steps that can be taken to solve the problem are as follows:

 Proper induction/orientation program should be conducted at the time of recruitment


 Expectations regarding roles and responsibilities from the hired and promoted employees
should be made clear and understandable
 Proper training and development programs, workshops can be conducted to upgrade and
enhance the work-related skills of the employees
 Setting up a competitive environment to let the employees realize their competencies and
invest adequate time to build them
 Soft skills training should also be provided to the employees for better communications and
inter-personal relations
 People in the organizations should have their own concept of growth. Ideally the role they
play should be in congruence with their concept of self-growth
 Proper communication mechanism, dialog, feedback processes should be cultivated within
the company
 Promotion and appraisal criteria should be made clear to the employees beforehand
 Goals setting should be done by the employee after discussing with manager. Every role
should set its competencies, since competencies drive the necessary behaviour resulting in
Performance.

d) What systemic and organizational processes changes should be brought in so that these
kinds of problems do not occur in the future?
Ans: Every role has a defined behaviour, responsibilities and success measures. Hence, promotion
criteria should be evaluated beforehand for the future. Instead of focusing on the past
performance alone, the focus should be on the potential shifts required for the job. Also, the
new employees or the new roles should be allocated with Induction process so as to ensure
a smooth flow into the new position. Also, the senior managers should be more vocal about
their organizational needs instead of focusing solely on the delivery.

You might also like