Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 79 views

    KBC 2009 Example 001 PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mohamed Abo-Zaid
    This document summarizes the results of a bending analysis performed on a steel beam using SAP2000 software. The beam is a W460x74 section subjected to uniform loads. The flexural strength is checked for three unsupported lengths: 1.75m, 4m, and 12m. The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations. For each case, the section compactness, moment capacity, and percent difference between SAP2000 and hand calculations are reported. The results show good agreement between the two methods.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    KBC 2009 Example 001 PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mohamed Abo-Zaid
    79 views7 pages
    This document summarizes the results of a bending analysis performed on a steel beam using SAP2000 software. The beam is a W460x74 section subjected to uniform loads. The flexural strength is checked for three unsupported lengths: 1.75m, 4m, and 12m. The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations. For each case, the section compactness, moment capacity, and percent difference between SAP2000 and hand calculations are reported. The results show good agreement between the two methods.

    Original Title

    KBC 2009 Example 001.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the results of a bending analysis performed on a steel beam using SAP2000 software. The beam is a W460x74 section subjected to uniform loads. The flexural strength is checked for three unsupported lengths: 1.75m, 4m, and 12m. The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations. For each case, the section compactness, moment capacity, and percent difference between SAP2000 and hand calculations are reported. The results show good agreement between the two methods.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    79 views7 pages

    KBC 2009 Example 001 PDF

    Uploaded by

    Mohamed Abo-Zaid
    This document summarizes the results of a bending analysis performed on a steel beam using SAP2000 software. The beam is a W460x74 section subjected to uniform loads. The flexural strength is checked for three unsupported lengths: 1.75m, 4m, and 12m. The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations. For each case, the section compactness, moment capacity, and percent difference between SAP2000 and hand calculations are reported. The results show good agreement between the two methods.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 7

    Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000


    REVISION NO.: 0

    KBC 2009 Example 001

    WIDE FLANGE MEMBER UNDER BENDING

    EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
    The design flexural strengths are checked for the beam shown below. The beam
    is loaded with a uniform load of 6.5 kN/m (D) and 11 kN/m (L). The flexural
    moment capacity is checked for three unsupported lengths in the weak direction,
    L b = 1.75 m, 4 m and 12 m.

    GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

    Member Properties Loading Geometry


    W460x74 w = 6.5 kN/m (D) Span, L = 12m
    E = 205,000 MPa w = 11.0 kN/m (L)
    Fy = 345 MPa

    TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


     Section Compactness Check (Bending)
     Member Bending Capacities
     Unsupported length factors

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 1


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    RESULTS COMPARISON

    Independent results are comparing with the results of SAP2000.

    Percent
    Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent Difference

    Compactness Compact Compact 0.00%

    C b ( Lb =1.75m) 1.003 1.002 0.10%

    φb M n ( Lb =1.75m) (kN-m) 515.43 515.43 0.00%

    C b ( Lb =4m) 1.015 1.014 0.10%

    φb M n ( Lb =4m) (kN-m) 394.6 394.2 0.10%

    C b ( Lb =12m) 1.136 1.136 0.00%

    φb M n ( Lb =12m) (kN-m) 113.19 113.45 0.22%

    COMPUTER FILE: KBC 2009 EX001

    CONCLUSION
    The results show an acceptable comparison with the independent results.

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 2


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    HAND CALCULATION

    Properties:
    Material:
    E = 205,000 MPa, F y = 345 MPa
    Section: W460x74
    b f = 191 mm, t f = 14.5 mm, d = 457 mm, t w = 9 mm
    h = d − 2t f = 457 − 2 • 14.5 = 428 mm

    h0 = d − t f = 457 − 14.5 = 442.5 mm


    S 33 = 1457.3 cm3, Z 33 = 1660 cm3
    I y =1670 cm4, r y = 42 mm, C w = 824296.4 cm6, J = 51.6 cm4

    I y Cw 1670 • 824296.4
    =rts = = 50.45 mm
    S33 1457.3

    Rm = 1.0 for doubly-symmetric sections


    Other:
    c = 1.0
    L = 12 m

    Loadings:
    w u = (1.2w d + 1.6w l ) = 1.2(6.5) + 1.6(11) = 25.4 kN/m

    Mu =
    wu L2
    8
    ∙
    = 25.4 122/8 = 457.2 kN-m

    Section Compactness:
    Localized Buckling for Flange:
    bf 191
    λ
    = = = 6.586
    2t f 2 • 14.5

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 3


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    E 205, 000
    =λ p 0.38
    = 0.38 = 9.263
    Fy 345

    λ < λ p , No localized flange buckling


    Flange is Compact.

    Localized Buckling for Web:


    h 428
    λ
    = = = 47.56
    tw 9

    E 205, 000
    =λ p 3.76
    = 3.76 = 91.654
    Fy 345

    λ < λ p , No localized web buckling


    Web is Compact.

    Section is Compact.

    Section Bending Capacity:


    M p =Fy Z 33 =345 • 1660 =572.7 kN-m

    Lateral-Torsional Buckling Parameters:


    Critical Lengths:
    E 205, 000
    Lp =
    1.76 ry =
    1.76 • 42 =
    1801.9 mm =
    1.8 m
    Fy 345
    2
    E Jc  0.7 Fy S33 ho 
    =Lr 1.95rts 1 + 1 + 6.76  
    0.7 Fy S33 ho  E Jc 
    2
    205, 000 51.6 • 1  0.7 • 345 1457.3 • 44.8 
    Lr = 1.95 • 50.45 1 + 1 + 6.76  
    0.7 • 345 1457.3 • 44.25  205, 000 51.6 • 1 

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 4


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    Lr = 5.25 m

    Non-Uniform Moment Magnification Factor:


    For the lateral-torsional buckling limit state, the non-uniform moment magnification factor is
    calculated using the following equation:

    12.5M max
    Cb = R m ≤ 3. 0 Eqn. 1
    2.5M max + 3M A + 4 M B + 3M C
    Where M A = first quarter-span moment, M B = mid-span moment, M C = second quarter-span
    moment.
    The required moments for Eqn. 1 can be calculated as a percentage of the maximum mid-span
    moment. Since the loading is uniform and the resulting moment is symmetric:
    2
    1 L 
    M A = MC = 1−  b 
    4 L 

    Member Bending Capacity for L b = 1.75 m:


    M=
    max =
    M B 1.00
    2 2
    1 L  1  1.75 
    MA =
    MC =
    1−  b  =
    1−   =
    0.995
    4 L  4  12 
    12.5 (1.00 )
    Cb =
    2.5 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.995 ) + 4 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.995 )

    Cb = 1.002

    Lb < L p , Lateral-Torsional buckling capacity is as follows:

    =
    M n =
    M p 572.7 kN-m

    φb M=
    n 0.9 • 572.7

    φb M n = 515.43 kN-m

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 5


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    Member Bending Capacity for L b = 4 m:

    M=
    max =
    M B 1.00
    2 2
    1 L  1 4 
    MA =
    MC =
    1−  b  =
    1−   = 0.972
    4 L  4  12 
    12.5 (1.00 )
    Cb =
    2.5 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.972 ) + 4 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.972 )

    Cb = 1.014

    L p < Lb < Lr , Lateral-Torsional buckling capacity is as follows:

      Lb − L p 
    M n = C b  M p − (M p − 0.7 Fy S 33 )  ≤Mp
      L − L 
     r p 
      4.00 − 1.80  
    =M n 1.014 572.7 − ( 572.7 − 0.7 • 0.345 • 1457.3)  =   437.97 kN-m
      5.25 − 1.80  
    φb M=
    n 0.9 • 437.97
    φb M n = 394.2 kN-m

    Member Bending Capacity for L b = 12 m:


    M=
    max =
    M B 1.00
    2 2
    1 L  1  12 
    MA =
    MC =
    1−  b  =
    1−   = 0.750 .
    4 L  4  12 
    12.5 (1.00 )
    Cb = (1.00 )
    2.5 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.750 ) + 4 (1.00 ) + 3 ( 0.750 )

    Cb = 1.136
    Lb > Lr , Lateral-Torsional buckling capacity is as follows:

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 6


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
    REVISION NO.: 0

    2
    Cbπ 2 E Jc  Lb 
    =Fcr 2
    1 + 0.078  
     Lb  S33 ho  rts 
     
     rts 
    1.136 • π 2 • 205, 000 51.6 • 1
    2
     12000 
    Fcr = 1 + 0.078   =
    86.5 MPa
     12000 
    2
    1457.3 • 44.25  50.45 
     
     50.45 
    M n = Fcr S 33 ≤ M p

    Mn =
    86.5 • 1457.3 =
    126.056kN-m

    φb M=
    n 0.9 • 126.056

    φb M n = 113.45 kN-m

    KBC 2009 Example 001 - 7

    You might also like