Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 56 views

    Aisc Asd-89 Example 001

    Uploaded by

    gusla7
    The document summarizes an example problem from the AISC ASD-89 manual involving the bending capacity of a W8x10 beam subjected to a 20 kip-ft moment. The ETABS software is shown to exactly match the independent hand calculation results for the beam's compactness check and design bending stress. Key outputs like the beam being non-compact and a bending stress of 30.74 ksi are confirmed to have a 0% difference between ETABS and the independent calculation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Aisc Asd-89 Example 001

    Uploaded by

    gusla7
    56 views5 pages
    The document summarizes an example problem from the AISC ASD-89 manual involving the bending capacity of a W8x10 beam subjected to a 20 kip-ft moment. The ETABS software is shown to exactly match the independent hand calculation results for the beam's compactness check and design bending stress. Key outputs like the beam being non-compact and a bending stress of 30.74 ksi are confirmed to have a 0% difference between ETABS and the independent calculation.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes an example problem from the AISC ASD-89 manual involving the bending capacity of a W8x10 beam subjected to a 20 kip-ft moment. The ETABS software is shown to exactly match the independent hand calculation results for the beam's compactness check and design bending stress. Key outputs like the beam being non-compact and a bending stress of 30.74 ksi are confirmed to have a 0% difference between ETABS and the independent calculation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    56 views5 pages

    Aisc Asd-89 Example 001

    Uploaded by

    gusla7
    The document summarizes an example problem from the AISC ASD-89 manual involving the bending capacity of a W8x10 beam subjected to a 20 kip-ft moment. The ETABS software is shown to exactly match the independent hand calculation results for the beam's compactness check and design bending stress. Key outputs like the beam being non-compact and a bending stress of 30.74 ksi are confirmed to have a 0% difference between ETABS and the independent calculation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: ETABS


    REVISION NO.: 0

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001

    WIDE FLANGE MEMBER UNDER BENDING

    EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
    The beam below is subjected to a bending moment of 20 kip-ft. The compression
    flange is braced at 3.0 ft intervals. The selected member is non-compact due to
    flange criteria.

    GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

    Member Properties Loading Geometry


    W6X12, M10X9, w = 1.0 klf Span, L = 12.65 ft
    W8X10
    E = 29000 ksi

    TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


     Section compactness check (bending)
     Member bending capacity

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001 - 1


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
    REVISION NO.: 0

    RESULTS COMPARISON

    Independent results are taken from Allowable Stress Design Manual of Steel
    Construction, Ninth Edition, 1989, Example 3, Page 2-6.

    Percent
    Output Parameter ETABS Independent Difference
    Compactness Non-Compact Non-Compact 0.00%

    Design Bending Stress, fb 30.74 30.74 0.00%


    (ksi)

    Allowable Bending Stress, 32.70 32.70 0.00 %


    Fb (ksi)

    COMPUTER FILE: AISC ASD-89 EX001

    CONCLUSION
    The results show an exact match with the independent results.

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001 - 2


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
    REVISION NO.: 0

    HAND CALCULATION

    Properties:
    Material: ASTM A572 Grade 50 Steel
    E = 29,000 ksi, Fy = 50 ksi
    Section: W8x10
    bf = 3.94 in, tf = 0.205 in, d = 7.98 in, tw = 0.17 in
    h = h − 2t f = 7.89 − 2 • 0.205 = 7.48 in
    Member:
    L = 12.65 ft
    lb = 3 ft
    Loadings:
    w = 1.0 k/ft

    M=
    wL2
    8
    ∙
    = 1.0 12.652/8 = 20.0 k-ft

    Design Bending Stress


    f=
    b M / S33= 20 • 12 / 7.8074

    fb = 30.74 ksi

    Section Compactness:
    Localized Buckling for Flange:
    bf 3.94
    λ
    = = = 9.610
    2t f 2 • 0.205

    65 65
    λp
    = = = 9.192
    Fy 50

    95 95
    λr = = = 13.435
    Fy 50

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001 - 3


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
    REVISION NO.: 0

    λ > λ p , Localized flange buckling is present.


    λ < λr ,
    Flange is Non-Compact.

    Localized Buckling for Web:


    d 7.89
    λ
    = = = 46.412
    tw 0.17
    P f
    No axial force is present, so f a= = 0 and a = 0 ≤ 0.16,so
    A Fy

    640  f  640  0 
    λ=
    p 1 − 3.74 a = 1 − 3.74 • =  90.510
    Fy  F y  50  50 

    λ < λ p , No localized web buckling


    Web is Compact.

    Section is Non-Compact.

    Section Bending Capacity


    Allowable Bending Stress
    Since section is Non-Compact
     bf 
    =
    Fb 33  0.79 − 0.002 Fy  Fy
     2t f 
     

    Fb 33 = ( 0.79 − 0.002 • 9.61• )


    50 50

    Fb 33 = 32.70 ksi

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001 - 4


    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
    REVISION NO.: 0

    Member Bending Capacity for Lb = 3.0 ft:


    Critical Length, lc:

     76b f 20,000 A f 
    l c = min  , 
     Fy dFy 

     76 • 3.94 20, 000 • 3.94 • 0.205 


    lc = min  , 
     50 7.89 • 50 
    lc = min {42.347, 40.948}

    lc = 40.948 in

    l22 =lb =3 • 12 =36 in

    l 22 < l c , section capacity is as follows:

    Fb 33 = 32.70 ksi

    AISC ASD-89 Example 001 - 5

    You might also like