Assignment 3
Assignment 3
Assignment 3
Through reading “Story 2: Fired, Hired, and Inspired” in our textbook, I was able to gain a
better understanding of the role both administrators and mentors play in the retention of a
new teacher.
First, the administrator played a larger hand in the teacher’s early failures in the classroom.
Mr. Z was hired later than most. While he still would have needed to play a bit of catch up,
the administrator could have made this transition much easier. The administrator should have
found a time to give him all the information he missed, and work more one on one with him
since he was missing essential trainings. Mr. Z did not attend the New Teacher Institute or
anything in that realm, and the administrator just threw him in without giving him some extra
supports. Even when the mentor was assigned, it felt as if she was assigned as an external
support rather than with support from the administrator. The conversations he had with his
mentor following his class period should have been able to be addressed with his
administrator two weeks prior. The administrator did not support Mr. Z from the beginning
and it just set him up for failure. This continued when he offered Mr. Z’s position to someone
else in October. Clearly the administrator did not want to put any effort into Mr. Z if he has
this little faith in him so early on. Mr. Z was not failing because he was a bad teacher, he was
failing because he was working for this administrator who offered no support. Finally,
leading up to his evaluation and “firing”, the administrator did not go in with solutions.
Instead of honestly evaluating and talking to Mr. Z, they gave him a bad evaluation and took
the easy way out.
I honestly feel a tad confused by this question but will still answer it to the best of my
capability. I believe there is a lot more that could have been done by the mentor in the
beginning to avoid some of the incidents that occurred. I believe most of the cliff-hanging
incidents were really caused by the mentor feeling overwhelmed herself. She never had a
relationship with the administrator, and when problems arose, she often froze first before
being able to offer solutions. When the mentor first entered the classroom, she mentioned
that she knew nothing about physics and just hoped that the teacher did. Throughout this
whole story, we never really saw the mentor making an effort in this regard and looking more
into some effective ways to teach science to be more specific to Mr. Z’s needs. I agree that
the mentor should not have overwhelmed Mr. Z with everything that needed to be improved,
but it also felt like she was never fully real with him about how many struggles there were.
Setting small goals was smart and effective, however she never had this difficult talk with
him and almost set him with unrealistic expectations going into his evaluation. As a mentor, I
think he needed a bit of a reality check and then her solutions. Instead she just seemed to
gloss over some of the issues and let him try to solve them on his own, instead of offering
some solutions for him. I think if she would have been a bit more upfront with him and had a
relationship with the administrator, he would not have jumped so quickly to quitting. As a
whole, this mentor teacher really did support Mr. Z and tried to do what was right for him
and the kids. However, if she had been a bit more proactive from the beginning, I believe
they could have avoided some of the cliff hanger incidents that occurred within the story.