Wood Harvesting: Basic Knowledge
Wood Harvesting: Basic Knowledge
Wood Harvesting: Basic Knowledge
Basic knowledge
The Wood Harvesting Module provides guidance to forest managers on best practices in wood
harvesting. It addresses the main aspects of harvesting operations, including planning, road
construction, felling, extraction, transport and post-harvest assessment.
The module provides basic and more detailed information on wood harvesting, as well as links
to wood harvesting tools and case studies of effective harvesting.
Wood harvesting encompasses felling, extraction, on site/landing processing, and loading of trees, logs or other tree parts onto trucks.
Harvesting has a lasting impact on forest structure and ecosystem functioning. Environmentally sound forest harvesting and transport
operations are therefore essential components of sustainable forestry. Good practices begin with careful planning, trained and motivated
workers with technically competent supervisors. Six areas are particularly critical from a sustainability standpoint. They are planning, roads,
felling, extraction, long-distance transport and post-harvest assessment.
Planning is broadly done at three levels, the strategic, tactical and operational levels. Strategic plans span over long periods and large
areas. Tactical plans cover shorter periods typically at landscape or watershed level. Operational plans incorporate actions needed to
conduct operations.
Roads built in connection to harvesting are typically classified as haul roads stretching from landing to mill or shipping point, feeder roads
built to reduce skidding/forwarding distances, strip roads to extract wood from stump to landing, and access roads e.g. for labour, material
and connection to administrative centres. Poor practices can be very damaging and costly, e.g. causing erosion and landslides. Competent
staff should be engaged in planning and construction of roads. Adequate maps need to be available. Areas of importance include drainage,
avoidance of steep grades, avoidance of sensitive areas and crossing of waterways.
Felling should be done to accommodate extraction and avoid damage to residual trees, i.e. a form of wood transport; this is sometimes
called directional felling. Felling is done using axes, saws, chainsaws, feller bunchers or harvesters.
Extraction by means of dragging stems or logs on the ground is called skidding. Skidding can be done by humans, draught animals or by
machines, so called skidders. Forwarding refers to stems or logs carried by humans or on a trailer after an animal or a machine (forwarder).
Skidders and forwarders can be wheeled or tracked. Crawler tractors (bulldozers) are often used for skidding in tropical rain forests.
A number of harvesting systems exist. None of the systems are inherently better or worse. Harvesting systems are classified as, full tree
systems, where trees are extracted to landing or plant with the full crown, tree length systems, where tops and branches have been
removed prior to extraction, and short wood systems, where topping, debranching and cross cutting are done close to the stump. Full tree
harvesting is a rare practice. The tree length systems is the most common method for industrial wood, it dominates in operations in natural
forests in the tropics. The shortwood system is on the increase. “Reduced Impact Logging” in rain forests is normally done using the tree
length system, with extraction by means of crawler tractors, skidders or cable systems.
Post-harvest assessments include checking that operational standards have been sufficient and that legal prescriptions and management
policies have been adhered to. Post-harvest actions may include shutting down logging roads, rehabilitating harvested areas and landings.
Harvest planning
The role of planning in sustainable forest management cannot be enough stressed. Below follows some brief introductory notes about
planning. There is a wealth of publications and other tools available beyond what is suggested in this module.
Meaningful harvest plans involve a good understanding of the objectives of the management plan, the harvesting systems available and the
logistics required. Information on site data is also needed.
Planning is broadly done at three levels: strategic, tactical and operational. Strategic plans span over long periods and large areas and
may involve e.g. management guidelines, construction of facilities and management intensity. Tactical plans cover shorter periods typically
at landscape or watershed level. They can be seen as the implementation of strategic plans. Operational plans incorporate actions needed
to conduct operations on the ground.
Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are now generally used in planning systems. They permit several factors to be taken into account
simultaneously in the planning process. The development of GPS receivers and digital data loggers have improved GIS greatly the last
years.
Felling
Felling should be viewed as wood transport, where the first few and most expensive metres matter. Facilitation of extraction is therefore a
primary concern. Felling should further not cause damage to logs. Damage to residual stand should also be taken into account.
Trees are felled manually using axes, cross cut saws or bow saws. Some delimbing is done using axes and machetes. The bow saw has
largely replaced the cross cut saw for trees up to 30 cm in diameter. Most felling in forestry is done by chainsaws today.
Uncontrolled felling. No attempt to influence the direction a tree falls, safety precautions and sound working techniques are
disregarded.
Semi-controlled felling. Fellers have a fair idea where a tree will fall but do not influence the lay. Basic rules are observed e.g.
rudimentary cutting of felling notches and back cuts.
Controlled/organised felling. Scarfs are well-executed, back cuts are well placed and hinges in accordance with desired felling
directions.
Directional felling. Fellers are fully capable of felling trees in the direction desired, which may deviate considerably from the natural
lean. Operational and silvicultural aspects are taken into account. Additional tools like wedges and winches are used.
High-tech felling. Fully mechanised felling using feller-bunchers or harvesters, and techniques/machines in development. Generally
not feasible for large trees.
Skills needed to perform organised or directional felling must be learnt on ground, preferably under supervision of professional instructors.
Guidelines for “typical cases” are available, e.g. trees with or without lean, with or without buttresses, according to lean, 45o or 90o to the
direction of the lean. In reality however, there is only “unique cases”.
Extraction
Extraction is the moving of stems from the forest or to the roadside or to a landing is generally done using the techniques described below.
Ground-Based Extraction
Pre-planning of extraction improves efficiency of extraction, increases safety and reduces damage to soil and residual trees.
The mode of work in natural forest is influenced by e.g. terrain, road and landing construction costs, silvicultural system and volume to be
removed per hectare. Some systems of organising extraction can be distinguished: parallel, radial, starburst, random, herringbone and
branching. In steep terrain parallel and branched strip roads are generally preferred. Trees are, if possible, to be felled so that extraction
machines do not have to leave the strip road. Strip road spacing varies with site conditions and extraction rates, but is generally wider than
in planted forests.
Strip roads should be flagged or opened up before felling commences. This is to make sure that they are passable, and to help fellers
choose felling directions. Sharp bends should be avoided.
In planted forests strip roads can be more or less parallel, generally at a spacing of 30 to 60 m.
Cable Extraction
In cable logging one or two suspended cables are used to convey logs from forest to landing. Cables are operated by a winching machine
(yarder or hauler) placed at the landing or the opposite end of the cableway.
Cable logging systems are generally more expensive than ground based extraction systems in areas where ground skidding is an option.
Soil damage is comparatively low in this system. Skilled staff is required at all levels of the operation.
Cable logging systems are divided into highlead or skyline systems. In highlead yarding logs or trees are dragged from the stump to the
landing. Yarding distances seldom exceed 300 m. The system is suitable for clear felling.
In skyline yarding/cable crane systems, one or both ends of logs or trees are suspended during transport. This benefits efficiency and
reduces ground disturbance. A skyline cable is mounted on a spar tree and runs to an anchor fixed at the opposite end of the cableway. A
wheeled carrier mechanism, a carriage, rides along the skyline cable to carry loads to landings and empty chokers back to the felling site.
Loads are attached to the carriage by a cable called the skidding line. Yarding distances can be much longer than for highlead systems.
Residual stand damage is not an issue in final fellings, but can be in intermediate harvests. Directional felling towards pre-aligned strip
roads reduces damage. Felling and extraction should start at the end of strip roads. Strip roads can be aligned more or less parallel to each
other. Strip roads for extraction can be aligned at spacings over 30 metres. Strip roads for mechanised felling normally need to be aligned
20 to 25 m apart.
Plantations are not necessarily production forests. Harvesting should be “in tune” with the functions of the plantation.
The intensively planned and carefully controlled implementation of timber harvesting operations to minimise the environmental impact on
forest stands and soils
A number of Codes of Practice and other standards have been written, and they are included as tools or cases in the present module.
Measures and treatments typically included are:
Fewer trees unnecessarily cut and better use of those cut, thus less waste
Improved cross cutting meaning a higher recovery of volume per tree and thus per hectare
More careful skidding also increases recovery of volume
The number of seriously damaged residual trees can be more than halved
The area disturbed by heavy machinery about halved
Economic evaluations have generally been favourable.
Operations tend to be small scale. There are advantages with chainsaw milling, e.g.:
A rule of thumb is that the chainsaw cylinder volume in cubic centimetres should greater than the log diameter in centimetres. Special
chains are available for chainsaw milling and should be used. Three types of mills are produced. They are: rail mills, frame mills and
carriage mills.
Freehand milling dominates in tropical forests. Recovery is low, typically 20 to 30 percent for freehand chainsaw, and around 50 percent
with carriage mills. Reference to images and videos of chainsaw milling are found in the Cases section.
Trees outside forests. Urban trees, roadside trees, hedges, scrub and trees in agroforestry constitute a major source of energy.
Planted forest. Planted forest supply almost 20 per cent of the world’s woodfuel.
Harvesting residues. A large share (sometimes up to half) of trees harvested is left behind as residues. Much of this can be used as
energy. This is fairly common practice in Scandinavia.
Salvage harvesting. Sick and dead trees in damaged stands can be removed and used for energy.
Thinning. Stems removed as part of pre-commercial thinning and other unmerchantable trees can be used for energy.
Feller-bunchers
Wheeled or track mounted machines designed fell and bunch trees to be skidded, forwarded, or processed. Some felling heads are capable
of handling trees of up to 75 cm. There is two general types. (1) Those with a hydraulically powered articulated swivel boom that sever, lift
and swing the trees to the desired direction. (2) Short wheel base machines with close coupled holding arms and shear heads, and depend
on moving and swinging the entire machine to perform the bunching function.
A harvester is a machine that fells, delimbs and cross cuts trees at the stump. There are wheeled as well as tracked carriages. Boom reach
is typically about 10 m.
Draught animals can be used for smaller logs from final felling operations and from thinnings in manmade forests. Animals used include
mules, oxen, water buffaloes and elephants.
The farm tractor can be equipped both skidding and forwarding, and also as a base machine for processors and simple harvesters. Farm
tractors are common in plantation forestry.
Skidders
Skidders are self-propelled machines for dragging trees or logs by means of winch rope, chokers, grapples or clambunks. Skidders can be
rubber tired or tracked. Tracked skidders are either rigid track skidders (crawler tractors/bulldozers) or flexi track skidders.
Forwarders
These are machines that transport trees or logs by carrying them on the chassis completely off the ground. Logs/trees are typically loaded
and unloaded using hydraulic or mechanical cranes.
Logs might be loaded on to trucks by truck mounted cranes (self-loading trucks) or by a separate loading machine. This can be a front end
loader, a wheeled or tracked machine with forks, lifts or grapples attached to lifting arms at the front end, or a hydraulic loader. Logs may
also be loaded manually or by means of simple winch systems.
In shovel logging log loaders are used to swing logs to the forest road. The loader moves across the harvest area, grabbing logs/trees
within reach, and swinging them around to drop them closer to the road until they are at roadside.
Cable yarders, spars and carriages
A cable yarder is a machine on which is mounted a system of winches that are used to convey logs from the felling area to the landing in a
cable yarding system. A spar is a standing or raised tree or steel tower used to provide lift for rigging in cable yarding. A carriage is a
wheeled assembly that moves back and forth on the cable while suspended above the ground. Logs are attached to the carriage by a
skidding line for yarding.
Further learning
Akay, A.E., Arzberger, U., Heinimann, H.R., Heinrich, R., Owende, P.M., Sessions, J. & Spinelli, R. 2004. Harvesting. In:
Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences Volume 1. (Burley J., Evans J. Youngquist J.A. editors) Elsevier. Oxford, page 247-285.
Apud, E., Dahlin, B., Fjeld, D., Hyttinen, P., Meyer F., Mikkonen, E. & McNabb, K. 2004.Operations In: Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences
Volume 2. (Burley J., Evans J. Youngquist J.A. editors) Elsevier. Oxford, UK. page 639-666.
Arzberger, U. & Grimoldi, M. (Eds.) 2003. New trends in wood harvesting with cable systems for sustainable forest management in the
mountains. Workshop Proceedings, Ossiach, Austria 2001. FAO, UNECE, ILO & IUFRO.
Bertault, J.G. & Kadir, K. 1998. Silvicultural research in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan. CIRAD-Foret, FORDA,
Inhutani I, Jakarta.
Conway, S. 1973. Timber cutting practices. Miller - Freeman San Francisco, USA.
Enters, T., Durst, P.B., Applegate, G.B., Kho, P.C.S. & Man, G. 2002. Applying reduced impact logging to advance sustainable forest
management. FAO, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Eeronheimo, E. 1990. Integrated small-scale harvesting and wood processing operation. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 1982. Logging of mountain forests. FAO Forestry Paper 33. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 1995. Use of construction crane for wood extraction in mountainous terrain. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 1996. Forest codes of practice. Contributing to environmentally sound forest operations. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 1998. Guidelines for the management of tropical forests 1. The production of wood. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 2004. Reduced impact logging in tropical forests. Literature synthesis, analysis and prototype statistical framework. Forest Harvesting
and Engineering Working Paper No. 1. FAO, Rome.
FAO. 2006. Taking stock: assessing progress in developing and implementing codes of practice for forest harvesting in ASEAN member
countries. RAP Publication 2006/10. ASEAN, FAO, Bangkok.
Grebner, D. 2013. Forest harvesting systems. In: Introduction to forestry and natural resources, pp 287-302. Academic Press.
McDermott, C.L., Cashore, B. & Kanowski, P. 2007. A global comparison of forest practice policies using Tasmania as a constant
case. GISF Research Paper 010, Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven.
Nambiar, E.K.S, Smethurst, P.J., Raison, J., House, A.P.N. & Moggridge, B. 2012. Assessment of code of practice for plantation
forestry: Tasmania. CSIRO.
Pokorny, B., Sabogal, C., Silva, J.N.M., Bernardo, P., Souza, J. & Zweede, J. 2005. Compliance with reduced-impact harvesting
guidelines by timber enterprises in terra firme forests of the Brazilian Amazon. International Forestry Review Vol.7 (1): 9-20.
Sessions, J. (ed.) 2010. Forest road operations in the Tropics. Springer, Berlin.
Sessions, J. (ed.) 1994. International seminar on Forest operations under mountainous conditions. University of Harbin, IUFRO, FAO &
FEI Inc.
Sessions, J. & Chung, W. (eds.) 1999. International mountain logging and 10th Pacific Northwest skyline symposium. Department of Forest
Engineering, Oregon State University & IUFRO. Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Spinelli, R., Secknus, M., Hartsough, B.R. & Francescato, V. 2007. Developing the forest-wood-energy chain through the reinforcement
of forest owners associations. Press Service SRL, Sesto Fiorentino Osmannoro.
Sundberg, U. & Silversides, C.R. 1988. Operational efficiency in forestry. Volume 1. Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sundberg, U. & Silversides, C.R. 1988. Operational efficiency in forestry. Volume 2. Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Washington State University Extension. 1999. A primer for timber harvesting. Washington State University Extension, Pullman,
Washington.
Wit, M. & van Dam, J. (eds.) 2010. Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets. Tropenbos International, Wageningen.
Videos
Amazon Sat. Amazônia Rural - Sustainable forest management – Part 1 [Portuguese]. Online video clip. YouTube, 1 April 2014.
Freite, F. Forest management project of Grupo Orsa [English version]. Online video clip. YouTube, 19 April 2011.
Web links
This module was developed with the kind collaboration of the following people and/or institutions:
Contributor(s): Simmone Rose, Cesar Sabogal, - FAO, Forestry Department; Rafaelle Spinelli
Reviewer(s): CATIE