Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    Lesson One Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-502603427
    The document outlines a rubric for marking mind maps. It evaluates criteria such as content, organization/design, language, and sources. For each criterion, it describes the requirements for work that is excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs work. Work that is excellent thoroughly addresses all questions with detail, is highly organized to enhance information, uses appropriate clear language with no errors, and effectively evaluates a large range of credible sources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lesson One Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-502603427
    27 views1 page
    The document outlines a rubric for marking mind maps. It evaluates criteria such as content, organization/design, language, and sources. For each criterion, it describes the requirements for work that is excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs work. Work that is excellent thoroughly addresses all questions with detail, is highly organized to enhance information, uses appropriate clear language with no errors, and effectively evaluates a large range of credible sources.

    Original Title

    lesson one rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines a rubric for marking mind maps. It evaluates criteria such as content, organization/design, language, and sources. For each criterion, it describes the requirements for work that is excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs work. Work that is excellent thoroughly addresses all questions with detail, is highly organized to enhance information, uses appropriate clear language with no errors, and effectively evaluates a large range of credible sources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    27 views1 page

    Lesson One Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-502603427
    The document outlines a rubric for marking mind maps. It evaluates criteria such as content, organization/design, language, and sources. For each criterion, it describes the requirements for work that is excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs work. Work that is excellent thoroughly addresses all questions with detail, is highly organized to enhance information, uses appropriate clear language with no errors, and effectively evaluates a large range of credible sources.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Mind Map Marking Rubric

    CRITERIA Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Work

    Content All questions are Questions are Questions are Questions are
    addressed in answered in with answered in answered with
    thorough detail. a good amount of sufficient detail. insufficient detail.
    detail.
    Organisation/Design Mind map is well Mind map is well Mind map clearly Mind map is
    thought out and thought out and organised. cluttered and/or
    (WAHASS53)
    highly organised. organised. Design Student has unorganised. The
    Design greatly helps to enhance made an attempt design does not
    enhances the information. to create a design help to enhance
    information. that enhances the information.
    the information.

    Language Student uses Student uses Student uses Student uses


    language that is language that is language that is language that is
    appropriate, appropriate, appropriate, not appropriate
    clear and clear and clear and and/or clear,
    coherent with coherent with coherent with hindering
    little to no errors. few errors. some errors. coherency.
    Sources Student uses a Student uses a Student uses a Student uses few
    large range of range of primary range of sources sources without
    (WAHASS52)
    primary and and secondary both primary and consideration of
    secondary sources and secondary and credibility.
    sources and makes a good attempts to
    evaluates their attempt to evaluate their
    credibility evaluate their credibility.
    effectively. credibility.

    You might also like